New Jersey Devils Outplayed by the Philadelphia Flyers, 3-2 Loss Ends Devils' 8 Game Winning Streak
The New Jersey Devils lost tonight and it was unfortunately a deserved loss. The loss ends the eight game winning streak as well ends the nine game road winning streak. The score reads 3-2, but the Philadelphia Flyers were the dominant team on the ice. They played with confidence, they played with smarts, and they were superb in clogging the neutral zone and their own slot. Quite frankly, they deserved the win tonight and they got it. NHL.com has their recap up, with links to the boxscore, highlights, and extra stats.
Poor would be would turn out to be the theme of the game for the Devils. Devils fans have a right to be unhappy with their favorite team's opponent - especially against a rival. But they should not have been surprised. Read on after the jump for my thoughts on the game. Check out Broad Street Hockey later for their recap of tonight's game.
First, some highlights from NHL.com. Come see how poor the Devils looked on the goals they gave up:
The Devils were poor with the puck, constantly turning it over and making poor passes throughout the night. The Devils were poor on defense, conceding 35 shots and a seemingly boatload of scoring chance to the Flyers. From what I understand, Mike Mottau and Colin White definitely did not have a good night. As an example, White's poor clearance on the Devils' first penalty kill went right back to the Flyers, who kept it in the zone. Scott Hartnell was able to get the puck and a cross-crease pass bounced off Mike Mottau and beat Brodeur. Perhaps tonight was the first game where the Devils truly missed Paul Martin (and Johnny Oduya). While Martin would have been a big help, we've seen the rest of the defense have had better nights. Tonight clearly wasn't one of them.
While Martin Brodeur made many big saves and kept this from being a Flyers rout by himself, even he had his poor moments. An clearance off the boards was stopped by Arron Asham, who fed it to an open Claude Giroux, who fed it to a wide-open Darrel Powe for the easy shot off Marty's flank. The clearance would be the first mistake, though the defense could have, you know, covered the other Flyer forwards. The second one would be more costly. When the Flyers forecheck kept the puck in deep, the puck came loose from the corner and just before Bryce Salvador played it, Brodeur poke-checked it. Only it went right to James Van Riemsdyk, who just fired it right back. That would be the Flyers' third goal and that one was fully Brodeur's error. Due to a last second consolation goal, it became the game winning goal. But, really, it was just a backbreaker. Since the goal was Marty's fault, it may look like he cost the game; but he really didn't. He made a lot of big saves tonight - he was the reason it's not 5-2 or 6-1 blowout loss.
As did Ray Emery at the other end. Only the Flyers benefited from a Devils' offense that went into hibernation for stretches at a time through the game. The Devils nearly went 12 minutes in the third period without a single shot on net. While down 2-1 and then 3-1. Seriously. This was the direct result of the Devils struggling on their breakout, constantly clearing the puck back to the Flyers, and with getting passes on target into the neutral zone. This was a problem that occurred again and again for the Devils - though they were able to get it together for some parts of the game.
For the most part, the Flyers were consistent in their attack, putting 35 shots on net on 62 total attempts (14 blocked by Devils, 13 misses). When the Devils were able to go forward, the Flyers' defense was literally right in their way. The Devils also had 35 shots on net, but made 73 attempts: they missed the net 12 times, and were blocked 26 times in the game. When you're getting blocked that much in a game, that's just awful. Jamie Langenbrunner had 5 shots on net and was blocked 6 times. Zach Parise, who managed a goal and an assist, had 4 shots on net and was blocked 5 times. David Clarkson led the team in shots tonight with seven and even he was denied by a Flyer 4 times when he was shooting.
All this speaks to poor shot selection. The Flyers let the Devils have the point, let them have the long shot, and the Devils stupidly took it over and over - only for the shot to be stopped or deflected in traffic. Whatever got through was calmly stopped by Emery.
The shot blocks/poor shooting decisions were most notable on the Devils' five power plays. Sure, the Devils finally did get a 5-on-3 power play goal thanks to David Clarkson's shot off a rebound. Yes, the Devils were able to have some good possession on their power plays. But the blocked shots just prevented it from being damaging. The Devils were able to move the puck in the zone only to not get a shot off at all because of the traffic - and when they did, it often was blocked. Those power plays were missed opportunities and I'm really surprised the Devils didn't adjust much for the Flyers' defensive gameplan.
The Flyers were able to clog the middle and successfully all night long. Emery did face 35 shots, but he didn't have to make ridiculous stops on rebounds or forwards behind his own defense multiple times. He was only beaten twice on point blank shots and you can't really fault him for that. At least, I wouldn't.
With poor defense, poor mistakes, poor puck movement, poor decisions to shoot, and not adjusting properly for the opposition's defending, how can you win? You don't. The Flyers only real big error was taking far too many stick-related penalties (two slashing calls, two tripping calls, a hi-sticking call). The scoreline was only kept close due to Brodeur's big saves and Zach Parise's last second put-back in the slot. I suppose Patrik Elias getting his first two points - assists - of the season is a positive. But even then, Devils fans can't be happy with the result nor how bad the Devils looked tonight. I'm certain Jacques Lemaire isn't happy with the performance.
So what now? Well, the sun will rise tomorrow. The eight game winning streak and the nine game road winning streak are both over, thanks to a poor game by the Devils. They do have a great opportunity to rebound on Thursday and Saturday. They'll be on the road in Nashville and Dallas. Good, winning performances there will not only restore their confidence, but send the message that this season's Devils team isn't just a flash in the pan. As far as the Flyers go, the Devils will have four more games to get revenge on them this season. Now is the time for the team to reflect on what went wrong and work on not making those mistakes in the next few games.
Thanks for reading. Thanks to Steve for the GameThread and to all the commenters. Please leave all your thoughts about the game in the comments and let's hope for a better game on Thursday.
0 recs |
19 comments
|
Comments
not the best effort from the devils
but dont take away to much from the flyers either they worked really hard and played a very very strong game.i do feel like the devils attacks got stronger as the game went on but they had no improvment on stopping the flyers from attacking.the flyers seemed to intercept and deflect alot of passes and were good at blocking shots.there fore check seemed real effective like the sabers did.
by Imperator_Celtic on Nov 16, 2009 11:30 PM EST reply actions
I hear a lot
of mention about our “trap” this year, but I didn’t hear anything about all of the 1-2-2 our opponent was playing yesterday.
I thought it was great when Vs. interviewed both Pronger (in the 1st) and John Stevens (in the 2nd) and both of them pointed out that the Devils were playing very offensively and we’re trying to speed the game up and put the Flyers on their heals. Actually when the interviewer asked Pronger about how the Devils “sit back” he replied – “not on the tapes Ive seen.”
Well at least the Flyers have caught on…
This is something I plan on editorializing about a little later tonight (early morning tomorrow?). I’m very glad you both noticed this because if the Devils have been trapping, it certainly hasn’t been working as intended.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Nov 17, 2009 5:59 PM EST up reply actions
I try to pay special attention to their defensive posturing during games and, while they’ll sit back here and there like any other team, depending on the situation, the only time I’ve really seen them fall back into a true defensive shell was after Murphy scored to go up 3 against the Caps. Facing a demoralized team that relies on high-risk/high reward plays, I don’t think anyone can fault them for that.
On the flip side, however, a detractor could probably make an argument that the Devils habit of falling behind in games forces them to be more aggressive than they would be normally.
I pay close attention as well, and over the past few seasons (Sutter really implemented the switch) they’ve trapped considerably less. In line with John’s more recent editorial, the Devils don’t really “trap” any more than other teams in the league. I know according to most of the hockey media that this next sentence is treason but, the Pittsburgh Penguins play the trap just as much as the Devils do. One of my best friends is a life-long Penguins fan and he finds all the talk of the “Devils Trap” ridiculous. He’s adamant that the two teams actually play fairly similar styles.
On the detractor note – thats exactly what I came across in the Caps comments at Japers Rink about the game. During the live game comments a Caps fan posted that he didnt see much of a trap from the Devils, the almost instant reply was “hard to go into a shell when you’re down 2-0 after 5 minutes.” Funny thing though, I don’t remember the Devils going into a shell once they went up 3-2…
I dont think the Devils played terribly but they were outplayed. The Flyers (this hurts) deserved the win and did it with some sound defensive play. They bottled up the neutral zone and blocked a ton of shots (sound familiar? although when its the Devils who do it its boring…). The Devs had their chances and Emery made some solid saves. Regardless, the streaks had to end at some point and it was a much better performance then the season opener.
we had no answer to philly’s:
forecheck
defense
offensive pressure
BUT, i think it’s great we had this game now and not later in the season. Our team will only get stronger as we play more skilled opponents. This is also great experience for our rookies while at the same time, a game like this can show what we are missing player-wise and may help Lou make a decision later in the season at the trade deadline. I mean at some point we will have to beat them to win the cup.
by Devil_Hard_Core on Nov 17, 2009 12:22 PM EST reply actions
but i still hate losing!!! damn dirty flyers!!!
by Devil_Hard_Core on Nov 17, 2009 12:26 PM EST up reply actions
They’ve struggled against aggressively forechecking teams all season, particularly the past few games, but have typically made the proper adjustments after the first period.
They need have learned two things from this game to make it worth the loss:
1. Teams are going to aggressively forecheck against them; come prepared
2. No team can continually and consistently give up early goals and expect to win in comeback fashion
Outside of those things, I don’t think it’s fair to say the Devils didn’t have the answers… they just didn’t have the execution. I don’t take any credit away from the Flyers, as they played a good game, but I can’t help but think that if the Devils were a little crisper on their passes (particularly their outlet passes) and smarter with their shot selections, it could have been a different game.
Let’s just hope that this was a one time thing and not the beginning of a trend. Here is where we, hopefully, see the difference between Sutter and Lemaire. The last two years, you could see these trends develop over a period of a few games, and they’d take a while to shake out of them.
The problem with
the outlet passes is that with no speed on the back end, we’re forced to try a home run pass to get into the offensive zone every time. Get well Martin and Oduya!
by Mandmeisterx on Nov 17, 2009 3:23 PM EST up reply actions
Stretch passes aren’t the only means they could have tried to break the Flyers trap. I think it was Eddie Olczyk that commented at one point during the game that Philly was giving the Devils defenders room to skate up further but they were instead trying to force the passes.
Granted, the Devils don’t have the most offensively minded or greatest puck handling defensemen, but they’re capable enough (even without Martin and Oduya) to have done something other than trying to futilely force long pass after long pass.
They just, for whatever reason, never adjusted. The Flyers seemed to know just what the Devils wanted to do and got in the all the right passing lanes. Throw in a bad passing game in general and it made for a tough night.
I agree that the Flyers were attempting to trap, though I’m a little confused how allowing 35 shots on net is really a successful trap.
What really doomed the Devils going forward were the passes – they were just often off the mark in pretty much anyway you can imagine. Some would go right to the other team. Some would miss their target. Some would hit the players’ skates or legs. Some would just bounce weirdly off their stick.
I will agree that the Flyers were very successful in clogging up the shooting lanes and preventing any cross-ice passes below the circles, though. The number of blocks they got alone speaks to their success.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Nov 17, 2009 5:58 PM EST up reply actions
They didn’t really start trapping until the third period, in which the Devils only got 9 on net (and the Flyers only took 7) even with the benefit of a power play. They did a little bit after they went up 2-0, but starting in the third they clamped down.
I agree fully about the passes. All night, fighting through a trap or not, they were always just a little off. Sometimes it was a good pass but too hard, other times the receiver mishandled it and other times yet it was a half-length too far ahead or behind.
Passing aside, my only complaint is that they didn’t seem to adapt to what the Flyers were giving them and kept trying to force that stretch pass.
Chalking it up to a bad night and hopefully they’ll get back on track in Nashville.
Passing
The Devils passing all season has looked a bit rough at times all season. Almost every game i’ve watched the opposing team has the better and more fluid passing.
Not sure what can be done about that during practice, but Elias is the team’s only really gifted passer in my opinion.
Guess I could have worded that better.
I was implying that without any D men comfortable on the break outs, they resorted to strictly the stretch passes, which are low percentage. I can’t think of a single time in that game where I saw a defenseman settle the puck behind the net and push it up.
by Mandmeisterx on Nov 18, 2009 7:55 PM EST up reply actions
I didn't get to watch the first period...
but from what I saw the Devils didn’t really play that awful. They had a few bad breaks and made some poor decisions. Consider the third goal the Flyers scored – it was a really bad play by Brodeur and he knew it. But he also kept the Devils in the game on a lot of plays so it’s hard to really get mad at him. The Devils are missing their best two defensemen….teams should be destroying them. Andy Greene is playing really well in Martin and Oduya’s absence. There are not going to win every game, and the Flyers have a lot of good young players. I’m surprised they aren’t doing better than they are doing actually. No reason for panic, just get ready for the next game!
As the Announcers Claimed During the Game...
Hockey played between two great teams can become a game where capitalizing on mistakes will decide the outcome. This was a game that the Devils seemed to be outworked, yet they were in it for the entire game until the last 8 minutes of the game. Two of the goals scored by the Flyers involved 1) Bad positioning on the part of defenseman 2)An over-aggressive Brodeur trying to get it out of the zone. Which I really can’t blame him.
Its a hard loss to take, but it was bound to happen. Whats most important is how the team bounces back. I’m confidant in their ability to learn from their mistakes and produce for the next game.

by 

















