Projected Production for 09-10 NJ Devils
The New Jersey Devils have played thirteen games, amounting to about 16% of their season, so what better time to project end of season numbers based on production thus far?!
While the sample size may be small, the season yet early, and injuries skewing certain stats (including the false, but easy, assumption that those currently injured will be back for game 14 and that Patrik Elias will not play a single game this year), certain trends may already be seen.
Or not. I just happened to have some spare time and found myself wondering if, all things being equal, the critics and vitriolic Caps fans from their game thread last night were on to something concerning the teams offensive production suffering under Lemaire.
Unable to figure out how to post the entire spreadsheet into this medium without it getting all wonky, I'll highlight the important, erm, highlights.
Zach Parise has scored 6-9-15 in 13 games and is projected to put up 38-57-95. While it'd be fewer goals and more assists than last year (45-49-94), it'd actually be a point better. Of note also is that he's projected to have 33 more SOG this season than last, but, accordingly, a lower S% (9.5 compared to 12.4 last season).
Travis Zajac has scored 6-7-13 in 13 games and is projected to put up 38-44-82. To say that is an increase is to put it lightly. Last season he accumulated 20-42-62 and he's shown improvement in all categories (projected to take 48 more SOG and increase his S% by almost 6%).
David Clarkson has scored 3-6-9 in 13 games and is projected to put up 19-38-57.
Nicklas Bergfors has scored 4-4-8 in 13 games and is projected to put up 25-25-50.
Jamie Langenbrunner has scored 2-7-9 in 13 games and is projected to put up 13-44-57.
Dainius Zubrus is on pace to score 13-25-38.
Rob Niedermayer is on pace to score 13-32-44.
Brian Rolston is on pace to score 19-13-32.
Andy Greene is on pace to score 6-19-25. By far, it is the best offense from the defensive corps, and that's assuming the unlikely projection of only 63 games played. I think it safe to say that, barring injury, he's cemented himself a starting spot and will play out the rest of the season. Hashing it out to the potential of 79 games, he'd put up 8-24-32.
All told, the projections indicate 196 goals for the season, but this omits any contribution from Elias. The Devils have averaged 227 per season since the lockout, with their high water mark coming last year with 244 (which still had them in the middle of the pack at 16th in the league). Assuming Elias can return and put up his average of ~25 goals, it appears the Devils offense, though falling off from last season, is pretty typical of the team, regardless of the coach or system in place.
So, what else, if anything, can we deduce from these solid, concrete, absolutely incontrovertible statistics? Several things:
- Zach is a machine. He's on pace to put up very similar numbers to last season, though with more shots required to do it, and any time he wants to take more shots, he's welcome to do so in my book.
- Zajac is also a machine. While it may be a stretch to think he'll keep up with Zach, or even break the 30 goal barrier, it's impossible not to acknowledge that he's getting better every year and is developing into a serious threat opponents will have to account for.
- A 57 point season out of Clarkson should silence anyone still upset about losing Madden.
- A 50 point season out of Bergfors should silence anyone still upset about losing Gionta.
- A 38 point season out of Zubrus would... well, be pretty sweet. I'm one of many who've been pretty vocally hard on Dainius, but if he put up those numbers while bouncing around between three different lines, I know at least one less person who'd be down on him.
- Niedermayer looks like a better signing than anyone envisioned. 44 points would best Maddens best year as a Devil, and almost double last years output.
- A 32 point season out of Rolston is probably about as good as we're going to get out of him.
Some interesting (or not) anomolies:
- Mark Fraser is 1-1-2 on two SOG, for a 50 S%.
- Bryce Salvador is on a Ken Daneyko-like pace to have a 0-19-19 season.
- Zajac, Niedermayer, Fraser and Greene are the only players on the team with a S% above 10%.
- Colin White is projected (0-6-6) to have his worst offensive season since '01-'02 when he went 2-3-5 in 73 games.
- Bergfors and Rolston are projected to have the exact same number of SOG (271), but Bergfors has the much better S% at 9.30, compared to Rolstons 6.98.
In conclusion, we all know that projections are just semi-informed guesses that don't account for any number of variables, but they do draw attention to certain revealing statistics that are good catalysts for discussion. Or in this case, rebutting the haters who rag on Lemaire and the entire team because their defense shuts down their teams offense.
In the end, it appears the Devils will be, at least on the stats page, very much like the teams of the past few years. Regardless of how this season may unfold, the continued development of players like Parise, Zajac, Bergfors and Clarkson point to only good things for the team.
All FanPosts and FanShots are the respective work of the author and not representative of the writers or other users of In Lou We Trust.
2 recs |
13 comments
|
Comments
In a startling revelation
I just realized that 38 points out of Zubrus was exactly what he had two seasons ago, and 2 less points than he had last season.
That I’d be elated with 38 out of him this year seems ridiculous considering how down I’ve been on him over the past two years. I can only defend myself by arguing that he just “looks” better this year and that his play, while not increasing his own stat lines, is what is helping his teammates.
zubrus seems to hit more and i think he crashed the net and got a game winner.atleast he has 2 game winners and one was against the rangers which is even better.
by Imperator_Celtic on Nov 5, 2009 2:20 PM EST up reply actions
I haven't been able to watch much hockey thus far this season,
but I truly hope that Zajac’s improved offensive prowess hasn’t come at a sacrifice of his defensive game. I truly think he’s one of the top ten defensive forwards in the league when he’s on his game. If he’s excelling at both ends, then great!
On the contrary
Zajac is developing into a complete player.
He’s fourth on the team in CORSI (2.28), behind only Fraser (3.4), Parise (3.17) and Langenbrunner (2.70).
The goals against/60 drop from 2.54 to 0.94 when he’s out there. Shots against/60 drop from 25.0 to 24.8 when he steps onto the ice.
His FO% has increased a full point from 53.1 last season to 54.1 this season.
Stats aside, just watching him you can tell that he’s a strong two way player. The kid is the real deal, and his blossoming offense is just a further facet to his game, not at the cost of it.
There offense numbers are going down,but it seems like there shots against are really really going down.I notice a ton more deflections,shot blocks hits and rederected passes.I guess its a trade off, a good one in my opinion but to each his own on that one.
by Imperator_Celtic on Nov 5, 2009 2:24 PM EST reply actions
I don’t think the offense is diminished at all. Exactly the opposite, I think we’re seeing the emergence of a more balanced attack.
Shooting percentages are down, but actual shots are up. And it’s early yet. It doesn’t take but one good game to drastically change long term projections. If Parise keeps shooting like he has been, he’s going to put up great numbers again this year, and with contributions from Zajac and Bergfors and Greene and Elias (not to mention that, based on production so far, the projections have guys like Martin, Oduya, Halischuk and Pikkarainen not scoring a single goal all year, and they’ve got to be good for a couple each), they might actually be above average this year.
We’re also seeing more and more teams putting an emphasis on blocking shots and keeping the front of the net clean, and that negatively affects scoring opportunities.
While I certainly think some pinches of salt should be taken with these progressions as players will get hurt, get hot, get cold, etc. This certainly an impressive way to look at things as they currently stand. Rec’d.
I think Rolston will do better than 32 points, truth be told.
Lastly, notice how the fans of the opposition always complain about the Devils’ “defensive, trapping ways” whenever they lose and/or play poorly against the Devils? I think that’s more than just coincidence.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
I also notice that other teams with strong defensive philosophies like Buffalo and Boston seem to get a pass.
It’s a pet peeve of mine, but arguing against the stigma is Sisyphean.
I think it’s best to just poke at it and laugh. Last I checked, the Devils are winning more often than not, so that would give us fans the right.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
I agree with you John
Rolston’s a much better player than he seems. Because he’s playing a Defensive role, he’s probably not going to get as many points as if he was a top 6. But 32 goals and 76 points from two checking line forwards is great, and I like those numbers from Bergfors and Clarkson
As for Langenbrunner… 13 goals? He’s going to get at least 20 goals
Space Weed Says The Steve Ott of Hockey Blogs
"DO NOT get stuck behind Kyle Wellwood in the buffet line. This isn't really etiquette, but it will prevent you from starving to death"- Down Goes Brown on Etiquette for Jason Spezza's wedding
by Kevin Sellathamby on Nov 5, 2009 7:49 PM EST up reply actions
I’m inclined to agree with you both about Rolston and Langenbrunner.
About as inclined as I am to agree that Clarkson and Bergfors and Zajac are most likely going to underachieve these projections.
It’s a fun thought experiment, and might be interesting to revisit later on, around the halfway point, to see how they compare.
That would be certainly interesting enough. A follow-up would do well if only to highlight how projections are only that – projections.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Nov 6, 2009 12:14 PM EST up reply actions

by 


















