What Do You Think the New Jersey Devils Should Do when Paul Martin Returns?
An update on Paul Martin's status appeared yesterday on NJ.com's Devils Beat Reporters Blog and in today's Star Ledger: Rich Chere reported that the New Jersey Devils may see Martin back for Christmas. Martin was a very important player last season on defense and was well on his way to continuing his form prior to his left arm being fractured back on October 24. I expected much from Martin prior to this season and outside of his offensive production, I felt he was doing well in his own end on those 9 games he did play.
However, the Devils have thrived in spite of losing Martin (and so many others) to injury. As Rich Chere noted the Devils have put together a 16-5-1 record without their de facto #1 defenseman. While Martin was eventually going to return, who would have guessed that Andy Greene would step up in his spot and take on more minutes? Who would have guessed Mike Mottau would follow behind Greene in minutes? Sure, I said back after the injury that Colin White, Bryce Salvador, Mottau, and Greene would have to take more minutes; but I didn't think it would be to this degree. And I certainly wouldn't have thought the Devils would hold teams to less than 28 shots per game on average (currently at 27.1, third best in the league) without the two-way defensive force that is Paul Martin.
Now that Martin could be coming back in December, some thoughtful questions come to my mind, both with respect to the short term and long term situation. I'm not going to provide my personal opinion, instead I want to know what you think. Feel free to answer as many or as few of these in comments; but I honestly would like to get an idea on what you think about what the New Jersey Devils should do when Paul Martin returns.
Short Term
Assume that when Paul Martin comes back, he's in good shape. Remember when Johnny Oduya came back from injury? He got 21:03 in his first game back from injury on December 5 against Detroit and was tentatively paired with Mark Fraser. However, throughout the game, he was cycled in with the other four regular Devils defenders and got some time on both the power play and penalty kill. Given that he replaced Matthew Corrente, who was getting limited minutes in his place, the positioning was easy to figure out. When Martin comes back, some tough decisions will have to be made. (Well, outside of keeping Mark Fraser as the 7th defenseman. Given that Jay Leach was picked up on waivers, surely Fraser would be if he were sent down to Lowell.)
1. Who do you pair Paul Martin with? The answer to this question in recent seasons has been Johnny Oduya. This gives the team the advantage of keeping their current pairings of Greene-Salvador and White-Mottau. However, this was not the case prior to the injury. The expected pairings for the Pittsburgh game were Martin-Salvador, White-Oduya, Greene-Mottau. Those moves were made back then because Oduya was playing poorly and if Lemaire liked what he saw from those pairings, they could be seen again. Perhaps depending on form, Lemaire could throw out something completely different. This will be immediately answered upon Martin's return.
2. How do you split up the workload? In 2006-07, Paul Martin averaged 25:13 per game, behind Brian Rafalski. In 2007-08, Martin averaged 23:53 per game to lead the defense. In 2008-09, Martin once again led all Devils blueliners in average time on ice with 24:22. And in the 9 games he played this season, Martin has averaged 23:57 per game - a higher average than Greene, despite Greene averaging over 26 minutes per game in November. Martin has regularly played a lot of minutes with his steady of play. However, while he's been gone, the team's defense hasn't suffered (or at least suffered significantly) when Andy Greene and Mike Mottau has taken similar minutes. They've proven themselves able, if not worthy, of playing so often. When Martin returns, everyone's workload will become easier, but how is it handled? Does Martin go back to eventually defending for 23-26 minutes per game? Does Lemaire continue his trust in Greene and Mottau and have everyone play a more modest 20-22 minutes? This will be answered a few games after Martin's return, depending on how everyone adjusts.
3. What about special teams, where will Martin fit in? Lemaire continued Brent Sutter's practice last season of putting 4 forwards on each power play unit - taking it further in a few cases in putting 5 forwards out there. So far this season, Andy Greene has stepped up his play enough to be the lone defenseman on the first power play unit; and a number of defenders have rotated in and out on the second power play unit - currently it's Johnny Oduya. When Martin comes back, the Devils will have 3 defenders who have the passing and puck possession skills to be involved in man advantage situations. Does Lemaire change the nature of the power play units, changing one of the units to a more traditional 3 forward-2 defensemen set-up? If Lemaire keeps the 1 defenseman units, who stays on them: Greene and Martin, Martin and Oduya, Greene and Oduya, someone else with someone else? And does Martin make it back to the first unit to begin with, given that he was never a point machine?
Similarly, where does Martin fit in on the penalty kill? Prior to the injury, Martin averaged 3 shorthanded minutes per game. He was the unquestioned first defender on the PK. He's too good to keep off the PK, so the question is really who gets bumped from the PK? Probably not Mike Mottau or Colin White, who average at least 2 minutes of PK time per game. Without Martin, the fourth defender has been rotated among three players - they'll likely be moved from a regular spot on the units? Should it be Bryce Salvador (1:52 SH ATOI/G)? Johnny Oduya (1:50 SH ATOI/G)? Andy Greene (1:29 ATOI/G)? Like the second question, the answer should become clear a few games after Martin returns.
Long Term
1. Should the Devils make a trade for an offensive/stud defenseman? ILWT user Los Diabolos raises in this FanPost what is an increasing question for the Devils: Should the Devils trade for Scott Niedermayer? Niedermayer is still a top defenseman at age 36 and there's no question to whether he would benefit the Devils. With Anaheim playing poorly so far and his brother Rob Niedermayer doing well for a successful Devils squad, the return of Scott Niedermayer to the blueline could put the Devils over the top. However, the cost for getting Niedermayer may be costly by the time the NHL Trade Deadline rolls around in early March. More importantly, bringing in Scott Niedermayer or any other defenseman would create many of the same questions I'm asking about Martin now.
Let's assume we're in late January and Paul Martin is performing very well along with the rest of the blueline. Assume all of the short term questions are answered. Should the Devils make a move to get a top defenseman if Martin is already doing well at the #1 spot? If not, would a blueline of Martin, Oduya, Greene, Mottau, White, Salvador, and Fraser as the spare defender be good enough for the rest of the season and the post season?
2. What should the Devils do about Paul Martin, the impending free agent? Per CapGeek, the Devils have one major unrestricted free agent for the summer of 2010 and it's Paul Martin. Martin is getting $4.5 million for the 2009-10 season and if he plays as well as he has been in prior years, he'll be looking for that much money or more. If he isn't, well, as a UFA, I imagine many teams will definitely offer him a significant amount of money anyway. However, the Devils have a number of important restricted free agents to tie up in David Clarkson, Niclas Bergfors, Rod Pelley, and Tyler Eckford among others; not to mention Mike Mottau is a UFA and will certainly get a raise. The Devils could very well spend the 2010 summer just keeping those guys and that's it. And that's not even considering 2011 (Langenbrunner UFA, Parise RFA a.k.a. The Summer of Zach Parise Getting Real Paid) The Devils may not be able to keep Martin at any cost anyway, but they'll have the space to give him plenty.
Given that the Devils are 16-5-1 without Martin this season and that Andy Greene has filled his spot on the defense to everyone's delight, is keeping Martin that much of a priority anymore? That very well could depend on the other defensemen's performance? Could the Devils possibly go without Martin in the future, in the hopes Greene is for real and can play as well as he does for a few more seasons? What if Oduya shows he can lead a defense in the next few months?
These are all, I think, valid and thoughtful questions at this juncture and so they require some thoughtful answers. Of course, we may not begin to see the answers until the Feel free to answer them how ever you'd like in the comments.
40 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The Martin debate is certainly an interesting one. I don’t think Greene can keep up pace the whole year (at least defensively) and we will need Martin. For me, Martin should at least start on 2nd pp, Oduya just doesn’t really get it done there.
I think Martin should be resigned, I am more interested in trading Oduya. Martin doesn’t have a lot of trade value unless he is resigned, especially to a team like Anaheim (aka non-playoff team). I think that if we can trade Oduya in a Niedermayer trade, it would be a great improvement, and an improvement in the CAP situation. We could always do something like this next year (assuming we don’t resign Mottau, which I wouldn’t):
Greene-Salvador
White-Martin
Corrente/Fraser-Eckford
Bringing up the rookies would help shed some salary for summer of Parise as well. Martin’s contract will be dependent on point production when he returns and how the CAP falls/rises.
Lots of tough questions.
If you had asked me in early October if trying to get Scott Niedermayer back was a good idea, I would have easily said yes. Now, I honestly don’t know if we need that. Although it really pains me to say that, since I’d love to see him on the Devils again.
Andy Greene has stepped up big time, and the rest of the defense has been, overall, pretty great. I do think it would be wise to re-sign Martin, as long as he continues to play as well as he has in the past.
Post edited for formatting
dsarch: Good point raising the salary cap overall. That’s a big wildcard that’ll affect everyone doing anything in the summer. I wouldn’t trade Oduya after signing him to significant money and I doubt Anaheim would want him back for Niedermayer, they’ll likely want prospects instead and start building again for the future on defens.e
brodeur: How the next few months will certainly play on the “Does NJ need Scott Niedermayer” card.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
Martin is one player the Devils have to re-sign. Mottau can be replaced by Fraser or Corrente, and I would be willing to see if a team wants Mottau this year for a draft pick. I think over the offseason try to move White (I believe he has one year left after this year). I would hope the Devils bring back Rob Niedermayer for one more season and let Pando go to clean up cap space. Nieder was not in high demand this summer and could be brought back at a discount over Pando.
Restricted FAs mostly stay with their organization unless the club wants to go in another direction. I do not see the Devils letting Clarkson Bergfors and Eckford go – now Pelley is another story.
by Team First Devils on Dec 14, 2009 8:48 PM EST reply actions
For a while now I’ve been ready to see the Devils part ways with White. He just never developed into the #1 shutdown Defensemen that I recall he was expected to do after Stevens and Daneyko retired.
If the Devils could trade away White and his salary we could more easily resign Martin and then Parise the following year while holding tight on most of our core Defense.
Mottau (maybe yes, maybe no), Oduya, Salvador, Martin, Greene, Fraser/Corrente/Eckford.
by Marty 4 Prez on Dec 14, 2009 8:58 PM EST up reply actions
I think over the offseason try to move White (I believe he has one year left after this year) I would hope the Devils bring back Rob Niedermayer for one more season and let Pando go to clean up cap space. Nieder was not in high demand this summer and could be brought back at a discount over Pando.
White’s contract ends after 2011-12; Pandolfo’s ends after 2010-11. And both have NTCs. I doubt the Devils will waive White and/or Pandolfo or something like that.
If the Devils could trade away White and his salary we could more easily resign Martin and then Parise the following year while holding tight on most of our core Defense.
Can’t be done, White’s got a NTC.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Dec 14, 2009 9:01 PM EST up reply actions
Then we’ll just call it wishful thinking.
by Marty 4 Prez on Dec 14, 2009 9:05 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
No pun intended, but just to play devils advocate: a NTC doesn’t mean they can’t be traded, just that they have to agree to it.
It’s possible in theory; there are teams out there lacking depth and/or experience willing to drop coin on an aging, still fairly effective player in the hopes of squeezing a little more production out of them before retirement. I agree that it’s not likely to happen, but stranger things have…
It's nice to have this kind of problem for a change....
One set of thoughts at a time:
- When Martin returns from his injury, I’m all for making Fraser the 7th defender and letting Eckford and Corrente get experience playing big minutes at Lowell. I figure one or two of the latter will end up with the big club in a regular role sooner or later — unless they’re shipped out as part of a deal. I’d split Oduya, Martin, and Greene into three separate pairings, and let the pairings sort themselves out by way of chemistry and need. Personally, I’d put White and Salvador with Oduya and Greene (in some order) because we’ve seen both Johnny and Andy jump up in the play a lot, and it helps to have a stay-at-home type to back them up since they will get caught at times.
- Unless someone comes in with a whopper of an offer this summer, I’d try to re-sign Martin for something in the range of what he makes now, as far as a cap hit goes. He fits in well with this team, and he is the closest thing we have to a #1 defender. Mottau can be replaced…. sure, he’s a nice player, but someone is going to give him years and money, and I think he’s the easier one to replace, especially if he’s essentially a third-pairing D-Man at this point. His spot becomes an ideal place to stick in Corrente or Eckford for next season.
- Rob Niedermeyer is a nice enough player, but I’d let him walk this summer. If there really is a need for his role to be filled by a veteran, there will be tons of them out there on the cheap during the off-season. Otherwise, let one of the kids from Lowell fill the job, and pocket the savings in cap space.
- Cap space will be important down the road. Good points regarding Parise and Langenbrunner for the summer after next, but don’t forget Andy Greene is a UFA that year as well and will command significant dollars (if not from NJ, someone else will pony up the dough). I’d also like to keep some cap space as to be able to take advantage of the opportunities that a falling cap is bound to unearth. Think the Malakhov-to-SJ deal, only in reverse — teams that have extra space will be well-equipped to take on a contract or two and be handsomely rewarded for the privledge, and it would be nice to be on the receiving end.
- I would not object to Scotty Niedermeyer, if the price is reasonable, but I imagine he’ll be in high demand if he is put on the market. Personally, I’d rather get a forward who can really put the puck in the net (even if it means renting Kovalchuk for two months).
- I don’t see how the Devils can reasonably trade Oduya right now. It is one thing if another team comes to us and offers us a lot for him, but putting his name out there will likely be seen as buyer’s remorse on the deal he got this summer, and I can’t see how we’d get equal value back in a trade. If the Devils are going to cut bait on a big(ger) contract and try to trade for what they can get, get rid of Dainius Zubrus (who the Devils seem to be fine without).
Welcome, and excellent use of the bullet point feature.
First point – that’s the likely scenario. Eckford’s already down at Lowell and Corrente won’t have to go through waivers, so he’ll be sent down upon return. I also like the reasoning behind the pairings.
Second and third points – I wish I had a handy list of pending UFAs because it’s very, very possible some teams are going to easily offer him more than $5 million/year. Depends on if the cap does change and who else is available.
Fourth points – Kovalchuk…hmmm…I’d love to see him in NJ, but I doubt the Atlanta franchise would just throw up their hands and start from scratch.
Fifth point – You’re right, I doubt Oduya has much value now and I’d argue the same for Zubrus. Both have been set back by injuries this year, which makes it a much harder sell. Assuming the Devils would want to move Oduya, for as you said, he was just re-signed last year. If the Devils want to dump a contract for someone who at least has been playing, why not Salvador who’s at $2.9 million/year?
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Dec 14, 2009 11:21 PM EST up reply actions
Kovalchuk
If Atlanta can talk Kovalchuk into signing on the dotted line, it becomes a moot point. I’m not sure that’s going to happen, however (and “experts” seem sharply divided)…. if he doesn’t sign an extension soon, I expect the Thrashers will at least start to explore possibilities in the trade market as not to lose him for nothing. I don’t see the Bouwmeester scenario working out for Atlanta — i.e. holding him to the end of the season and trading his rights in late June, because he’ll be close enough to the open market to test it.
Oh no, please don’t dump Salvador. He’s one of our most responsible D-men who can shut down a team and lay a beating on them with some big hits. Not sure if his numbers +/- reflect this, but he seems like he is the type of player the Devils would want as a defenseman.
by Devil_Hard_Core on Dec 16, 2009 11:38 AM EST up reply actions
With the defenseman problem:
I would like to see the lines as
Greene Salvador
Oduya Martin
White Fraser/Corrente
And then send Mottou down. I like Fraser and Corrente because they are young, aggressive and physical.
And in the offseason I say we try and offload Oduya. He doesn’t seem quite the same this year and is not really worth all the money we pay him.
I know what you mean about Oduya, after last year I was expecting a breakout year for him- I realize he’s been hurt and the season is still young but even before the injury and even now after playing a few games he really looks average out there to this point as opposed to last year where I saw flashes of tremendous potential.
Welcome
I’m not sure why Mottau should be sent down? OK, it’s an interesting idea, but he’s been playing well and (more importantly) has been an excellent value player. You can’t ask for much more for someone who’s not even being paid a million. He’d be picked up off of waivers for sure if he was sent down. That said, he’s a UFA in the summer so it’s possible he just walks and Corrente/Fraser/etc. can fight for his spot in camp.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Dec 14, 2009 11:23 PM EST up reply actions
Mottau
Seriously do some of you watch games or just read box scores and then speak about namess you recognize? Mottau is having a career season why on earth would send him down? He’s excellent in the line-up and excellent trade-bait to highlight.
Agreed...
The past month or so, it seems Mottau has been playing extremely well from the games I’ve watched. It would be crazy to send him down.
by undersuspicion426 on Dec 15, 2009 1:37 AM EST up reply actions
I actually do watch every game despite the fact that I go to Creighton U in Omaha….so no just reading the box scores here. Idk I just feel like the young guys have done such a really great job filling in and to just bump them down to AHL isn’t really right and I feel bad. I know the reality that when Martin comes back either Corrente and Fraser will be sent down, I just feel like we should keep them around to keep the veteran players from getting complacent. I wish we could keep them all on the roster lol!
~Btw what do think is going to happen with Pierre-Luc Letourneau-Leblond (PL3)? Are we going to keep him as a scratch every game and then send him down to AHL for conditioning every once in a while?
I think our defensive pairings should be:
Martin-Greene
Salvador-Oduya
White-Mottau
Frasier
I think Greene has proven he can handle big minutes and with someone like Martin to cover him, he’ll make even less mistakes.
For the PP, I think we can go with both type of lines depending on the situation in the game. Go with Greene/Martin on 1st pp depending on who was just out on the ice, and go with both in tight games where we don’t want any SH situations.
For the PK, while Greene seems to be really good at blocking shots, I think we need to spread out the minutes. But some of the pairings seems to be hit or miss when it comes to the pk.
We definitely need to sign Martin in the offseason, but if he wants too much, we still have plenty of talent in Lowell coming up and certainly can replace him.
As for the rest, Mottau is excellent trade material. We certainly have a fine d-man in Frasier and he replaces almost everything Mottau can do. If we’re going to re-sign Martin we certainly don’t need Mottau. We can’t move White because of the NTC and his experience is always nice on the back end. We can wait til after his contract expires to replace him.
With the way our d-men are playing, we pretty much have a solid group of borderline 1st to 2nd pairing d-men. So it is defense by commitee and they do a good job at it. I think NJ has better d-men than a lot of the other teams out there and people underrate our d-men all the time. With this group there is no reason why we can’t go far in the playoffs.
Lou, don’t trade for another d-man at the trade deadline. That will only mess up the chemistry we have and actually make us worse.
What to do about the D
If Anaheim continues to circle the drain, then maybe re-acquiring Niedermayer would be a good idea. It could help the Devils clear some of the glut of D-men, position themselves better for a long playoff run, and free up some cap space for the offseason. So, here’s how I think it would work:
—Philadelphia set the market for what it could cost to get a #1 D-man by gaving up a prospect, a contributing player, two #1 picks, and a conditional second rounder for Pronger and a spare part. But that was in June, not the trade deadline, and Pronger hasn’t been openly talking of tretirement like Nieder has. So I would expect the price to get Nieder wouldn’t be quite as high.
-Let’s start with a contributing player - Someone who could replace Nieder on Anaheim’s blue line. Oduya (unless of course, he has a no-movement clause in his contract) — he’s signed for a couple of years at a reasonable price, he’s young enough to have several good years left, and he can definitely play better than he’s shown.
-In terms of prospects - I’d suggest Tyler Eckford, and (who with Greene, Corrente, and Fraser all on the cusp, and Urbom lurking behind him seems like an odd man out) and a young forward like Halischuck (though I admit I’m not as familiar with the forward prospects, and Halischuck was the first name that came to mind.)
—I’m sure the Devs would also have to throw in at least a 1st round pick, but hopefully that would be the only draft choice they’d have to surrender. (And hopefully, with Nieder in the fold, Anaheim would be looking at getting the 30th pick from NJ…)
So for the 2010 playoffs, that would leave NJ with a defense of Nieder, Greene, Salvador, Martin, White, Fraser, and Mottau; with Fraser as the spare.
And with Nieder probably retiring after the season, along with Oduya’s contract off the books, there’d be some more cash to re-sign Martin. And then for the 2010-11 season, the team could open with a defense of Martin, Salvador, Greene, White, Fraser, and Corrente as the top 6. Or, if they don’t feel Corrente is ready, re-signing Mottau is an option too
I don’t know if it is worth our while to lose one of our promising prospects to rent Niedermayer for a few months. While potentially he can make our blueline much better, and he will be reunited with his brother, you never know what other factors could come by adding him. Certainly losing Eckford isn’t as big a deal to rent Niedermayer, but I would hate to lose Halischuk or any of our other promising forwards like Sestito. Though with the log jam coming in from Cormier and Henrique, maybe we can spare Sestito.
The question is what are the Ducks looking for? Defense or Offense? Depth or a stud? Niedermayer is still only 36, younger than Brodeur and there probably is still plenty left in the tank. If Lou can convince him to sign on a few more years, then this trade would be worth its weight in gold.
Niedermayer has pretty much said that this is going to be his last season, so any trade for him would certainly be a rental.
And while I would hate to see Halischuck go, the Ducks would probably be more interested in him than in Sestito, as Sestito 3-4 years older. With that logjam of forwards ton the way — Cormier, Henrique, Tedenby, Josefssen (spelling?), on top of the younger guys who are in the NHL now like Berfors, Parise, Zajac, Clarkson, Pelley, and Zharkov, I could easily see someone like Halischuck being squeezed out
by HockeyWeasel on Dec 15, 2009 12:44 PM EST up reply actions
TRADE MARTIN NOW
Martin and a draft pick to Anaheim for Niedermayer staright up.
Does anyone hear think Martin is a 5 plus milliuon dollar defensmen? thats what he is gonna get next year.
i doubt ana.will make that trade cause martins contract is over after this year.that wouldnt really be a improvment ove neidermayer.
by Imperator_Celtic on Dec 15, 2009 3:43 PM EST up reply actions
Philadelphia set the market
for a player who is going to sign a long term contract.
Every offseason Nieder has thought about hanging up the skates. I am not trading higher level guys for someone who will be here for a few months. The market for these types are no where near what some here will give up.
If he walks away after this season – Ducks get nothing
I am willing to trade a pick (2nd or 3rd) Halischuk OR Pelley – and a minor D man in Lowell (I would give Eckford but start the talks with Taormina)
and if he re-signs for the 10-11 season NJ gives another 2nd or 3rd draft pick
Ducks do not want that deal – look for another player
by Team First Devils on Dec 15, 2009 2:41 PM EST reply actions
those few months of niedermayer
might be the 4 rounds of playoffs that would lead to the devils 4th stanly cup.i personally think he wouldnt be able to resist a chance to go for a repeat after that.
by Imperator_Celtic on Dec 15, 2009 3:39 PM EST up reply actions
Scott would not be able to resist another Cup – make that 5 for him if he gets it -
Name any player who would resist a chance to win the cup – no one
but it depends on the amount the Ducks will want for him.
If you are asking me do I want Scott? -- YES still a very good player – one year contract (great factors here)
Now tell me what the Devs have to give up – we will have times I say NO WAY – no deal
by Team First Devils on Dec 15, 2009 3:58 PM EST up reply actions
In that case....
If you give up Oduya to rent Niedermeyer, you’re obliged to re-sign Martin without regard for the cost and cap hit (or to trade for another big-ticket D-man). While the Devils are a resilient bunch and have weathered the defection of a lot of good players over the years, I imagine there would be big problems if your projected first pair for next year is Andy Greene and either White or Salvador. And knowing this, Martin has all kinds of leverage to increase his payout.
The fact that the Flyers were getting Pronger for a full season probably makes more of a difference than the contract he signed after the trade.
And for that full season, Philadelphia paid a higher price than 1 roster player, 2 B/B+ prospects, and a #1 pick. They gave up 1 roster player, an A prospect, 2 #1 picks, and a conditional #2.
Trading Oduya in addition to Eckford, Halischuck and a pick for Niedermayer is about more than just the trade value. It’s about clearing more than 3 mil off the cap in each of the next two seasons, and opening a spot in the D rotation for some of the younger players. With Oduya’s salary gone, that’s a few more million to spread around to keep guys like Martin, Parise, Clarkson, etc..
by HockeyWeasel on Dec 15, 2009 3:59 PM EST up reply actions
for me I would trade
Oduya Pelley and a pick
I would like to keep Eckford to replace Oduya Nieder (if he leaves) and Motts
if they want another D-man I continue to say Taormina
by Team First Devils on Dec 15, 2009 4:07 PM EST up reply actions
prehaps a longer term trade migh happen.
the sutters would be interested in oduya,after all he played very well with brent as there coach.i know alot of people are down on phaneuf because he has yet to live up to expectations and to them i offer this thought.24 yrs. of age is way way to young to evaluate the career of a NHL defenseman.i live in the capitals area as a kid(6)till high school i watched alot of scott stevens not that he wasnt good then (my favorite player at the time) but i really dont think anyone new he would turn into the captain of a team that won 3 stanley cups in 4 times in the finals.it takes more time for defensemen to fully develop in the NHL.lemarie would speed up the process.
by Imperator_Celtic on Dec 15, 2009 4:06 PM EST reply actions
neidermayer is more likely in my opinion did u see his smile on the 2003 tribute game
i think he is coming back personally.oduya is young he could defenatly be a part of the ducks rebuilding as well.the ducks would be foolish to trade for martin his contract is up this year.
by Imperator_Celtic on Dec 15, 2009 4:07 PM EST up reply actions
The problem though, is that Phaneuf carries a pretty big cap hit, around 6.5 mil. And with a lot of key players coming up for new deals in the next couple of summers, I would imagine the focus would be on clearing cap space, not filling it.
by HockeyWeasel on Dec 15, 2009 4:12 PM EST up reply actions
it would be the end of martin in 2011 and
it would be a huge gamble for thr devils no doubt about that.
by Imperator_Celtic on Dec 15, 2009 4:15 PM EST up reply actions
Most of this has been captured by the comments already but…
Id like to see Martin, Oduya, and Greene split up as the 3 “offensive” defensemen. Greene should continue to receive heavy minutes, he’s earned it and right now he’s clearly the anchor of the defense at both ends of the ice. He shouldn’t play 28-30 minutes but if his play keeps up I want him on the ice 20-25 minutes a night
The other 3 will (and should) be White, Salvador, and Mottau. Pairings should be based on chemistry. I would like to see them try Martin and White at first to see how it goes. Salvador and White are fairly interchangeable, they play the same style and are a similar size but White’s better positionally. Mottau is what he is. He’s a great value player as was pointed out above and this season in particular has done a great job (especially in the last month or so). He also does have his lapses, but I think his positives outweigh them. Additionally his minutes can now be reduced to more reasonable levels, which may cut down on them. All three of them are vets and have proven they can handle heavy minutes without the team’s won-loss record being significantly impacted.
I really like Fraser but lets be honest he’s the #7 and will have to really outplay Mottau to get into the lineup regularly (there’s no chance he unseats any of the other 5 d-men). However, I can see Lemaire working to get him in the lineup enough so that his development doesnt stagnate and he’s ready to step in in case of an injury or trade. He’ll have a great shot at making the team next year along with Corrente and Eckford, who were both impressive in their stints with the big club. For now I like the two of them playing 25-30 minutes a night in Lowell under Johnny Mac.
White plays best with Mottau, and 2nd best with Greene.
Salvador plays best with Greene.
Mottau has chemistry with Greene as well.
So how are you going to work that into the pairings you suggest?
Martin seems to bomb with Salvador, Oduya is so so with Salvador, lousy with White. Martin and White doesn’t always click either.
The Key
I think the most important thing to do with Martin is to not jump him into the action Greene shouldn’t be pushed over to let Martin back in, we wouldn’t want him going back into the 6th defender shadow… which is sometimes the case with “suprise breakouts”. Im looking forward to see what happens though.
Thx for post quote!
If this team keeps playing well, I don’t see Lou making any moves. We still have to wait for our players to come back from injury, especially Martin and Clarkson. Then they also have to play bad and I think only then Lou will see what is available. Unless a major injury hits, it will be a waiting game until the trade deadline.
Classic Lou at his best. He’ll keep you guessing and you still won’t figure him out. But he is the genius. Made a believer out of me this year for real!
Hopefully the Devils can keep this level of play going late in the season when the other teams step it up to another gear.
Go Devils!!!
by Devil_Hard_Core on Dec 16, 2009 12:14 PM EST reply actions

by 















