New Jersey Devils Dominated by Chicago Blackhawks, Lose 5-1
The New Jersey Devils were beaten by the Chicago Blackhawks in a big way tonight at the United Center. The Devils lost their third straight on New Year's Eve, their first game on the second half of a back-to-back, and lost in a very bad way.
If you don't feel like reading my whole recap, let me sum it up this way. Andrew Peters played for the Devils tonight and he wasn't the worst skater on the Devils tonight. In fact, I'd go as far as to say he had a relatively good night. He kept pace with his linemates Rod Pelley and Vladimir Zharkov, for 9:39 of ice time. He made some successful passes. He even threw a hit. Yeah, it was that bad for the Devils and that's all you really need to know.
Conversely, the Chicago Blackhawks looked brilliant in all aspects of the game. SamFels' description of the team from my preview was impeccably correct. Their speed and committment to backchecking were apparent and the Devils had no real answer for them. Not on defense, not on offense, and definitely not in the neutral zone. Their special teams were wildly successful. Cristobal Huet played very well and the one goal against wasn't his fault.
This wasn't like the 4-1 loss to the Washington Capitals last Saturday, in my opinion. This was worse. The Blackhawks just dismantled and demoralized the Devils tonight. An ugly way to end what has otherwise been a fantastic 2009 calender year to this 2009-10 season for New Jersey. Read on further for my thoughts or go visit Second City Hockey for what should be an ecstatic recap from a Blackhawk fans' perspective.
I apologize if this seems shorter than usual, but there's not a lot of praise for the Devils here. You could say that the best Devil on the ice was Rod Pelley. Actually that's not entirely correct, he was the best Devil on the ice tonight. In 10:14 of ice time, he had 3 shots, won 6 out of 8 faceoffs, and was skating hard even late in the third period when the Devils were down 5-0 and looked completed defeated. Sure, Jamie Langenbrunner's excellent forecheck on Duncan Keith won the puck (the only mistake Keith made all night), got a shot on Huet, and put back his own rebound gave the Devils a consoltation goal. Good work on that shift, but that was his only major contribution to the game - he only got 13:27 for a reason tonight.
As far as the rest, the ZZ Bergfors unit attempted to get things going but couldn't sustain significant offensive pressure all game long. I do credit the Blackhawks' defense and their backchecking forwards for their hard work in stopping the Devils. But the first line couldn't get many chances, the second line was absolutely invisible, and what did the other two lines do on offense? Zach Parise was sprung for a breakaway in the second period, but when he was stopped, it only cemented that it would be a poor night for New Jersey. The Devils only put 27 shots on Huet; the power play got repeatedly owned by Chicago's PK units - only 3 shots on 6 minutes of PP time; and very few shots that truly challenged Huet. From this game alone, I can see why Canada Hockey chose both Duncan Keith and Brent Seabrook for their Olympic team; they are an excellent pairing (and Brian Campbell had a great night too).
Speaking of cement, let's talk about the defense. The only positive I can think of for the defense is that Mike Mottau had 7 blocks tonight. The Andy Greene and Johnny Oduya pairing was repeatedly abused by a combination of hungry Chicago players fearlessly forechecking and terrible passing. Each had "highlights" of looking real dumb in their own end that led to goals. Greene left Ben Eager uncovered in the slot, making it easy for him to score Chicago's second goal. Oduya was severely burned right after Chicago easily killed a Jonathan Toews penalty by, who else, Toews. Towes feinted, Oduya coughed up the puck, and buries a laser to make it 4-0 New Jersey.
The both collectively failed en route to Chicago's third goal scored on a rebound by Andrew Ladd. You know what, here's the highlights to the game via NHL.com and you can see it for yourself. In fact, you can also see Troy Brouwer's power play goal that was Chicago's first goal and John Madden's goal wherein the Colin White and Mike Mottau pairing got beaten by a solid forecheck by Dustin Byfuglien and Madden's shot that used Mottau as a screen:
Mind you, from these highlights you can see some saves from Brodeur. Martin Brodeur's night wasn't a good one, certainly. But it's not like the defense helped him out all that much either. He played out of his mind against Pittsburgh, but it wasn't to be tonight, unfortunately.
Overall, the Blackhawks outshot the Devils 36-27, outdrew the Devils on faceoffs (52%-48%), outplayed the Devils for at least 50 minutes (the first 10 minutes were even), and - obviously - outscored the Devils 5-1. I don't believe the Devils were tired; but they were just beaten. After the quickfire double by Chicago, they just charged ahead on the Devils, who were more than happy to help them out. All over the place, there were poor stickchecks, ridiculously dumb sweeping stick checks, passes that went off skates, poor dumps on offense, and everything else you could name. Chicago, with their speed and their hunger, just kept getting the puck and kept going forward. They pounced on the lackadasical efforts on defense, and so tonight was easy for them.
I wish the Devils gave a better effort against a top team like Chicago. What was seen tonight by the Devils' faithful was garbage, really. The game on Saturday will have to be another one to bounce back from.
0 recs |
7 comments
|
Comments
Thankfully, we didn't get shutout.
That said, I was more thankful to not have seen this mess.
And Peters WASN’T the worst skater tonight? That must sadly make my Carl picture post obsolete.
Beer is good! And stuff!
I did not see the game, was checking in on my blackberry. That being said, John I think you are beating the team up a bit much. Would we like to see the team play a solid game against a team that looks like it may go a long way this season – sure. However, given that this was a road game (and a pretty good travel amount after playing the night before) after a key divisional game the night before, I just cant get that worked up about it. They laid an egg, and in an 82 game schedule, even a very good team is going to do that a bunch of games – maybe a dozen + times.
This would have been a MUCH bigger loss for the Blackhawks than the Devils.
Separately, I wonder what a pro team does for New Year’s eve when they are on the road in the middle of a Road trip. I guess Chicago would be a decent city to be in.
by Devilssection21fan on Jan 1, 2010 9:17 AM EST reply actions
just what I expected...
This game does not surprise me at all. A replay of last year on New Years eve. Put it behind us Devil fans and maybe we will meet them in the stanley cup finals. By the way it would have been a good game to rest Brodeur..
Donald Vasquez
While I would have loved for the Devils to win this one, part of me is glad they lost. Why? Because this is a good humbling loss that hopefully will get into their heads and not let the team’s ego get too wrapped up in their record or the standings.
They just got embarrassed by another Cup contender from the opposing conference. I don’t want them to ever forget that this season and when they meet again later this season to play with a chip on their shoulder.
This was the first Devils game of the year that I couldn’t sit the whole way through.
There were definitely contributing factors to a poor showing, but none of them are acceptable excuses. I could accept that they were tired; who wouldn’t be? But they were wholly off of their game. It was similar enough to the Washington game last weekend in that they came out and couldn’t skate, pass, shoot, forecheck or play defense anywhere near to the standard we expect and they need.
I do hope the team continues its trend of not following up a stinker with another one, but the increasing frequency of the stinkers is beginning to become troublesome.
I love Brodeur to death but I would’ve loved to see Danis in for this game. I know the defense really didn’t help much in the effort, and that JL would never dare to bench his #1 goalie against a top 3 team, but I believe Danis would’ve held on. The players knowing that they don’t have Brodeur on net would normally tend for them to make up for what they lack.
Bad loss though. I was listening from across the planet and I could feel the cringe-worthy effort from the team.
by vincent enrique on Jan 1, 2010 11:04 AM EST reply actions
Bad Loss Against a Great Team
So the Devils began the month of December losing to Vancouver 5-2 at home. And they end the month losing to Chicago 5-1 away. I considered these to be the two worst losses of the season so far, with Chicago having a slight edge. The game against Washington after Christmas was also a bad game.
I’ll admit that I didn’t watch through a great deal of this game. But from what i saw, we played an absolutely awful game. No energy, no hustle, bad play overall. Not sure what to really say about all of this. Maybe the best thing to say is, we should be glad we don’t see this team again until March. Another thing would be, as long as we bounce back against Minnesota on Saturday, thats all that matters to me. Its the thought of compiling losses that I am worried more about as opposed to losing to great teams. And Chicago is one of them.
"We aim above the mark to hit the mark." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson

by 


















