In Lou We Trust: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: College Football Preseason Top 25 Rankings

New Jersey Devils Give Up 2 Goal Lead, Pull Out Win over Detroit Red Wings in Shootout

Last Saturday, the New Jersey Devils snowballed their way to a huge 6-1 win over the New York Islanders.  As the game went on, the Devils played better and went on to dominate on the ice and on the scoreboard.  Tonight, the opposite happened as the Devils hosted the Detroit Red Wings.  The Devils started off great, slowed down a bit in the second period, and then reverted to how they looked last night in the third period.  In the process, the Devils conceded a two goal lead and the game was forced into overtime and followed by a shootout. The Devils won there, the final became 4-3, and so NHL.com has your recap complete with the relevant stats.

The Devils prevailed there, but I can't honestly say I'm pleased with the performance. I know, I know, it's a results-oriented business and the Devils just picked up 4 points in 48 hours.  Fine.  But the Devils could have and should have done better tonight, especially because they played so well and worked so hard in the first period.   Credit the Detroit Red Wings for responding after being beaten on first twenty minutes, they eventually took the game over and made it a game. 

Winging it in Motown has their recap up and joehass wonders why Patrick Eaves wasn't used in the shootout for Detroit given that he had a goal and an assist.  Read on my extended thoughts on tonight's game.

Star-divide

Let's talk about the goaltenders first.  Martin Brodeur and Chris Osgood, I felt, played well. Both goaltenders had to come up huge at various points.  Brodeur bailed the Devils out of the third period, whereas Chris Osgood robbed the Devils a few times earlier - most notably Ilkka Pikkarainen's backhand.  A bit odd to say given that both gave up 3 goals each.  However, only one of the six goals scored in regulation was really a soft - Johnny Oduya's individual effort sliding right through Osgood's legs.  The other goals were off rebounds where the goaltender had no chance on (Jamie Langenbrunner, and one deflection by Patrick Eaves. Here's a video of the game's highlights from NHL.com. See for yourself:

Now, you can see where the momentum lied in the shots by period.  The Devils' first period was very strong.  They bossed the Detroit skaters around, they moved the puck up ice at will, they owned the neutral zone, and outshot the Wings 11-7.  They were doing what I said I wanted them to do in the game preview - be aggressive on offense.    If you had seen that period, then you became increasingly amazed at how the Devils took their foot off the proverbial pedal.  In the second period, Detroit pulled one back (Kris Draper on a rebound), the Devils responded with a goal of their own (Rob Niedermayer on a rebound created by Vladimir Zharkov), and then Detroit capitalized on a power play near the end of the period (Thomas Holmstrom on a tip).  Sure, the Devils were leading after the period, 3-2; but the Red Wings clearly made adjustments that the Devils didn't have many answers for and so outshot the Devils 11-9.  No longer was Detroit being outworked, no longer was Detroit constantly giving away the puck in the neutral zone.

And then the third period came and it reminded me so much of last night, it was sick in retrospect.  It started off well enough. Jay Pandolfo nearly had a goal when his shot from the high slot was stopped by Chris Osgood.  The puck bounced up, over Osgood, and was about to slide in only for Brad Stuart to swoop in and clear it off the line.   From that point on, Detroit took over in pinning the Devils back, forcing them to clear the puck right back to Detroit, and repeat.   Patrick Eaves got the equalizer off a deflection and Martin Brodeur should be thanked for keeping the score tied.  After all, the Devils only put 3 shots on Osgood in the third (11-3 Detroit in terms of shots).  Where were the Devils of the first period?  Where was the aggressive offense?  Truthfully, the Devils escaped the third period and were fortunate to earn a point with that kind of "offense."

Overtime saw the Devils actually make an effort to score a goal and came close when a deflected shot by Travis Zajac beat Osgood, but was denied by the post.  Alas, this game needed a shootout and the Devils pull out a win. The fans (it was a very good and loud crowd at the Rock) were real happy with the win, nearly everyone standing for every shot and Devils attempt.  Exciting stuff, but I can't help but think that most would have liked to have seen the Devils continue to do what they did in the first period and put the game out of doubt.  But Detroit responded real well and the Devils wilted.   I also can't help but think of the following cliche: good teams know how to win games that they perhaps shouldn't have.  The Devils did just that in the last two games.  So I guess they are a good team.

A few Devils stuck out tonight, in my opinion.  I felt Jay Pandolfo (17:58, 1 A, 2 SOG) and Johnny Oduya (21:01, 1 G, 3 hits) had good games.  I was a bit concerned with how they would look after not playing for at least a month, and my concerns were quickly erased.  Both hustled pretty well and didn't make too many noticeable mistakes as they played significant minutes. Well, Oduya did jump up on offense, got caught, and didn't really recover well as Darren Helm unloaded a shot that Kris Draper eventually knocked in.  But Oduya was just a part of that, the other Devils should have helped out in recovery; so I wouldn't kill him for that one.  Rob Niedermayer had a good game, he had 3 shots on net and went right to the net at the right time for the Devils' third goal.  He played just over 19 minutes (19:17) and statistically I can only fault him for going 5 for 13 on faceoffs.   I also felt Colin White (21:00) and Mike Mottau (24:57) had a solid game on defense.  This is especially good news for White as he left Friday's game early due to "lower body soreness."  Tonight, he stayed in and feels pretty good afterward according to Gulitti's postgame report. 

In terms of Devils who stuck out for not being noticeable (this makes sense, hear me out), I'd have to point the finger to Patrik Elias and Brian Rolston.  Last week, they were a dynamite duo.  Tonight, they weren't really there.  Rolston had 3 shots on net and played 14:57.  None of those shots were of particular importance and he managed to get blocked twice and miss the net three times.  I didn't think he had an impact.  Elias got the win-clinching goal in the shootout, but he did little else in the game.  He also played far less than I thought, only 14:05, put 1 shot on net, and was thoroughly beaten at the faceoff dot (3 for 11).  The offense has a whole suffered as the game went on, and these two really do need to take more initiative to prevent this from happening in future games.

I do have to credit Detroit's defense in part of stifling New Jersey's offense.  Nicklas Lidstrom is an absolute joy to watch on the blueline.  He knows where to position himself, when to step up on a player, when to drop back, and he is so slick with the puck.   A few times in the game, a Devil forward would have the puck and carry it over the blueline only to just dump it away because he knows he can't beat Lidstrom in a one-on-one battle.   It's no wonder he's known as a dominant defenseman.  Naturally, he played 30:48 for Detroit because he really is that important.  Jonathan Ericsson also came back from injury and put in a good (not perfect, but good) effort in playing 28:24 (!!), often along side Lidstrom.  Overall, the Red Wings' D cleaned up a lot of rebounds and Lidstrom alone made things difficult for the Devils' offense after the first period.  Not that the Devils' offense was particularly interested in attacking them by the third period.

So what's next? The Devils have four games in the coming week and they really need to be more consistently positive on offense. That means putting shots on net through all three periods. That means not allowing the opposition to dictate the play when up with a lead. That means not giving up a two goal lead in a game.   I think it'll get better, hopefully by Monday when they go up to Buffalo.  Thanks to Steve and commenters in the GameThread, as well as all of the readers.  Feel free to leave your thoughts, questions, complaints, stats I missed, and anything else you feel about tonight's shootout win in the comments.

0 recs  |  Comment 11 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

3rd period

Very scary for a minute there’ I didnt think we were gonna pull out of it

by Devilman3030 on Dec 6, 2009 12:30 AM EST reply actions  

great game...

2 of the best teams in hockey went at it and it was evenly played. Momentum swings took place often. Oduya and Pandolfo looked good welcome back..Devils showed they can play with the big boys and prevail. Shame it had to be decided in a shootout.

Donald Vasquez

by don_vas on Dec 6, 2009 9:02 AM EST reply actions  

In the first period, the top lines were facing off and ZZ Pops were dominating (which was great to see, considering Datsyuk and Zetterberg are both perennial Selke candidates), but they got away from that match-up as the game went on. With Lemaire having the final change, I can’t figure out why that should be.

It was a bit disturbing to see the Devils just shut off the offense like they did in the third. It wasn’t like they were sitting back in a defensive shell… they just stopped pressing. Some credit has to be given to Detroit’s defense, and that they woke up for the OT is somewhat comforting, but their just not show up for stretches through two games is alarming. 3 shots is unacceptable, and I hope the coaching staff is drilling that into their heads at this very moment.

by elesias on Dec 6, 2009 9:29 AM EST reply actions  

I din’t see Bergfors play nor listed as a scratch, was he just not listed as sitting out? As for Rolstons game I’m not sure he has it in the tank anymore to play at a high level game in and out, to compensate as it appears to me and I may be very wrong seems he plays high in the offensive zone waiting for a feed and just firing away that shot he has hoping for something good to happen much as a defenceman does’ on the blueline attack thereby allowing him to drop back quicker to help the “D” without having to skate every shift end to end.It is hard to find any team to play a full 60 min. every game but if you do find it you will also find that team with a lot of young legs-for me the difference between this team being a good team and a championship team will be a sufficient influx of young players mixed with our skilled vets.

by eppy on Dec 6, 2009 9:35 AM EST reply actions  

according to nhl.com...

he played about 16:51, although i didn’t notice him much either.

by undersuspicion426 on Dec 6, 2009 10:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Bergfors had 16:51 TOI

He had 3 shots, 1:02 on the PP and was a -2 (maybe that’s why you didn’t notice him).

I’m with you on Rolston. I bought into the ankle injury throwing him off all year hypothesis, but as this year wears on and his performance remains spotty, I wonder if he shouldn’t be getting less ice time (and more practice hitting the net with his shots).

On the other hand, however, he does seem to have pretty good chemistry with Elias (who looked frustrated and out of sync last night). I think the Pandolfo-Niedermayer-Zharkov line looked really good together last night, so it’s hard to want to tinker with it, but maybe Zharkov and Rolston should switch places…

As to being a champion team, I think they’ve got the right mix. Whether it all comes together remains to be seen. I’m somewhat tentative to believe just yet, but I do find it amusing that the knock on the Devils seems, invariably, to be that they don’t have the talent to get past Pittsburgh or Washington (although they’re 5-0 against them so far) or the size to get by the Flyers (still, for some reason, favored to do something big this year—even though the Capitals proved last night that you don’t need to match their size to beat them).

by elesias on Dec 6, 2009 10:16 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m with you on Rolston. I bought into the ankle injury throwing him off all year hypothesis, but as this year wears on and his performance remains spotty, I wonder if he shouldn’t be getting less ice time (and more practice hitting the net with his shots).

Well, he got exactly that last night with only 14:57 of ice time. I’ve noticed that Lemaire didn’t change up his lines a lot last night, so both Elias and Rolston were together in not seeing much.

Also, the fourth line actually got 10 minutes of ice time (Pikkarainen – 10:29, Pelley – 10:54, McAmmond – 14:38). Since that line got more time than usual, that means less time for everyone else – I would think that’s a factor too.

I think Elias and Rolston didn’t have good games, that’s all.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Dec 6, 2009 11:49 AM EST up reply actions  

I wonder if the fourth line getting more time is a product of the other three being fatigued or if Lemaire thought they were playing well.

They combined for 3 shots, no points and an even +/-; the only blemish being Pikkarainen’s penalty. McAmmond even got some PP and PK time, so perhaps it is the latter.

I’m still not sold on Rolston, though. He does well enough often enough that I really can’t bag on him too hard, but I just can’t shake the feeling that there’s a better option or way of using him.

by elesias on Dec 6, 2009 12:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Because it’s Christmastime and I’m feeling suitably magnanimous, I’m willing to give Bergfors a pass for one not so great game. And even if it weren’t the season of giving, I still wouldn’t throw Bergfors under the bus for last night’s performance (not that I’m accusing you or anyone else of doing so, elesias) because in the twenty-seven games the Devils have played this season, Bergfors has 8 goals and 10 assists for 18 points, which is quite good for a player who, in my opinion, was treated unfairly last season by the Devils previous coach who, for whatever reason, did not seem so inclined to give Bergfors the ice-time or linemates he needed to prove his worth as a player before shipping him back down to Lowell and favor of such stellar alternatives as Sheldon Brookbank. The only thing that I would like to see improve would be Bergfors’ +/- (in the 27 games he played thus far, he’s a -1), but even that isn’t particularly unusual for a young player during his first full season in the league. There’s a bit of a learning curve as far as that goes, and if there’s anyone who can improve a young forward’s play on the other side of the puck, it’s Jacques Lemaire.

by kellyn on Dec 6, 2009 2:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I love me some Bergfors.

Throw out the boneheaded closing the hand on the puck penalty he took a while back and I think he’s a pretty darn good replacement for Gionta. And, he’s a rookie, so the best is yet to come (but then, so too is probably the worst).

by elesias on Dec 6, 2009 2:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Parise

It seems like Parise can score in a shootout blindfolded. The moves he put on Osgood was nasty.

by Yankeesjetsfan on Dec 7, 2009 3:39 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the New Jersey Devils! New here? Check out the Rules and Guidelines before posting.
Start posting about the Devils »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

SBNation.com Recent Stories

PHILADELPHIA - MAY 16:  A fan of the Philadelphia Flyers holds up a sign reading "Next Goalie" behind goalie Carey Price #32 of the Montreal Canadiens in Game 1 of the Eastern Conference Finals during the 2010 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs at Wachovia Center on May 16, 2010 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.  (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)

Habs Finally Lock Up Carey Price, Sign Goalie To Two-Year Deal

National Hockey League commissioner Gary Bettman answers questions during a pre-game media availability before the Pittsburgh Penguins season opener against the New York Rangers in a NHL hockey game in Pittsburgh, Friday, Oct. 2, 2009. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar) +25 updates

Ultimatum? NHL Reportedly Threatens To Toss Out Kovalchuk, Luongo Deals Without NHLPA Concessions

Photo +1 updates

Report: Donald Fehr Hands NHLPA List Of Conditions On Becoming Union Leader

More from SBNation.com >

joomla visitors

Managers

Stanley_cup_and_you_-_sbn_small John Fischer

Authors

N665754327_5889_small TibbsBeastoftheEast

Puddy_small Tom Stivali

Marty_sbetter_small Matthew Ventolo

J-roc_small Kevin Sellathamby