Game 7 Aftermath
I'm pleased and happy to report that the sun did rise in New Jersey after last night's shocking, heartbreaking, depressing, and stomach/groin-punchingly-bad Game 7 loss to Carolina. Other than that, I'm not really feeling pleased or happy.
Anyway. Not to steal from Tibbs' thunder, but there were a few stories that deserve a little extra notice.
First Tom Gulitti provides the near-definitive explanation as to what happened in those fateful 80 seconds by doing what few non-Canes who saw the game did: watch those 80 seconds again. Gulitti is wise to point out that it was the ZZ Pops line who was out there for the equalizer - putting lie to the theory that the top lines = defensive stops; and that Eric Staal being given the space he had really was a mistake in retrospect. The only item that Gulitti missed is that Mike Mottau felt he could have done something. Rich Chere had the telling quote last night:
"I had my stick out thinking he was going to cut back," Mottau explained. "I figured, 'Give him that shot.' I didn't want him to get to the middle. He got good wood on it. A perfect shot."
Even so, if someone wants to know exactly happened, send them the link to Gulitti's description. It deserves the posterity, really.
Second Relevant to that last quote, Lou summed up the general reaction about the loss to Chere, who had the same reaction: shock.
I have covered all 223 New Jersey Devils playoff games for The Star-Ledger. There have been worse losses, like Game 7 of the 2001 Stanley Cup finals, and more embarrassing losses.
Never has there been a more shocking loss than Tuesday night's seventh game against the Carolina Hurricanes at the Prudential Center. On that, Devils general manager Lou Lamoriello agreed with me.
"I don't have any explanation for what occurred last night," Lamoriello told me Wednesday morning. "In all my years I have not seen something like that."
"You don't blame anybody," Lamoriello said. "Anybody who does that or thinks that way or insituates that is just looking for excuses."
As much as we'd like to find a scapegoat (e.g. Havelid, Mottau, Brodeur, the Madden line, Brent Sutter, "the new NHL," the fact that you didn't wear your lucky underwear, etc.), this is the correct approach.
Even if one of the Devils players or coaches stood up and said, "It's all my fault, I did X, I didn't do Y, and I caused us to lose Game 7 and the series," it won't change what happened. The Devils still lost regardless. It doesn't even guarantee it won't happen again. Outside of catharsis, what do we get out of it? What do the Devils get out of it? Nothing all that much. The mature and constructive approach is to (begrudgingly) accept that it happened, look at what happened within the entire series (not just one game or 2 minutes) and the entire season (not just 2 weeks in March), and determine what truly does need change - be it by adjustment or replacement.
The anger and emotion is understandable. I feel it too, but it makes for some pretty poor decision making. Fortunately, we don't make those decisions: Lou does.
Third Because some loudmouth leaving the Rock tried to assure me that Sutter was leaving with some choice words, I argued otherwise with some other choice words. (The only "clean" part of it was when I said he sounded like a Rangers fan) In any case, since some of the sentiment of anger is calling for Sutter's head, I think this is important: Gulitti gets a statement from Lou regarding Sutter's status.
Devils general manager Lou Lamoriello said this morning that he has no reason to believe that Brent Sutter won't be back as his head coach next season.
He also made it clear that he wants Sutter to come back.
"There should be no discussion on this," Lamoriello told me today. "I have no knowledge of anything. You have to speak to Brent about this. Even to get into discussions about this makes no sense."
Comparing how the Devils played under Sutter in comparison to, say, Claude Julien, I don't disagree with Lou's feeling here. Especially given the earlier quote. I don't think Sutter is the problem. With respect to Sutter's thoughts on his own status, I would have to think Sutter doesn't want to go out like this. I don't think anyone would want to end a coaching tenure on such a poor note.
Fourth I don't know about you, but personally, I'm looking forward to seeing Boston 1-2-2 their way to dominate Carolina in Round 2. I'm also looking forward to seeing Eric Staal fall down some more. Round 2 begins on Friday, so expect a poll on that tomorrow.
3 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
On Sutter and the Devils Future...
This is a pivotal off-season for the Devils. I think Sutter is the right coach and hope he’s the coach next year. I really like how he has changed the style of play over the past few seasons. Stevens, Daneyko, and Niedermayer are long gone, you can’t sit back and jam up the neutral zone, now the team’s strength is clearly its forwards. But this is also where I get puzzled, Sutter wouldn’t match Zubrus’ or Zajac’s line agaisnt Staal, he kept going with Madden’s. I switched over to the Caps-Rangers game during both intermission and saw Fedorov score the winner but that wasn’t the impressive part, it was how the Caps played in the last two minutes that was. Simply put I think the Rangers got over the red line with the puck once, the Caps had them pinned in their zone and Lundqvist was never pulled – in a 2-1 game 7. I don’t think we need to discuss the last 2 minutes of the Devils game but that was clearly not what happened.
The style of play Sutter wants to play is clearly a more up-tempo, puck possession game, and moves were clearly made this past off-season to shift the team in that direction, but more need to made. This team belongs to Zajac and Parise now, not Brodeur and White (the only one left from our “championship” defense, and he was the #4 or 5 on those teams but I digress…). When the Devils were at their best this season, they didn’t care about who the other team sent out on the ice, they dictated the play. They didn’t try to do that enough in this series. Are Staal, Whitney, and insert winger X, scarier than Parise, Zajac, and Langenbrunner? Can’t Elias and Gionta match up on these guys? Madden, Pandolfo, and Shanahan played well but why let the other team dictate the play when you have those other 5 forwards and Rolston? The only other puzzling moves by Sutter (their long-term) are, the Martin-Oduya pairing. For better or worse they are the two best offensive defensemen (and maybe even defensemen period) on the same pairing and why does Oduya not consistently play on the power play? Watching Mottau try to get the puck out of the zone last night was painful at times, and I can’t help but thinking if the pairing was Oduya and White that puck is out of the zone. But all this may be a symptom of the roster. The Devils (more Lou I guess) need to either embrace Sutter’s desired play and get the players necessary or let him go.
A glaring need is clearly an offensive defenseman who can man the first power play unit – I love Martin but the stats clearly indicate he can’t do it. This of course would fit right in with Sutter’s style as would re-signing Gionta and letting Madden walk. I commented a few days ago about Gionta. His goals have dropped and the 48 were clearly a hot year, but he’s 20 4 or 5 years in a row now and his assists are still high. He clearly has heart (something that I can see some other players being questioned on) playing a more physical game than players that are twice his size and he’s a consistent second line scoring threat. On Madden, I love him and he’s done a lot for the Devils but I can’t deal with the line matching anymore, it has been our undoing every season since the lockout. Madden isn’t as effective without such a task and he’ll cost a few million. The bigger reason however is that when the Devils looked like world beaters from January to early March they didn’t match lines, they let Parise, Zajac, Elias, et al dictate the game – and remember all this was when Clemmensen was in goal. Which brings me to that question, re-sign him and give him 30-35 games next year. Marty is 37 going on 38 and had some, ummm, lapses in this series. Clemmer “saved” the season and had the Devils looking like Stanley Cup contenders. He’s not the long term answer but he deserves it and I think the team played better with him in net. If possible it would be nice to add even more scoring depth at forward – but a #1 offensive defensemen is the priority.

by 
















