Offseason 09: How to Fix the Devils
Watching the Stanley Cup Finals now, I can't help but think how it should be us. We should be watching the Devils battle the Red Wings right now, and we very well might be had the team not decided to sit back as if they still had the likes of Stevens and Daneyko to save the day. But now that the offseason is unfortunately upon us, I’d like to try placing myself in the GM’s chair with regard to the decisions that need to be made. Here is what I would do in dealing with free agency and why.
Keep
Johnny Oduya
Oduya should be priority #1 for the Devils this offseason. Rather underrated, and the only major piece of our defense set to become unrestricted, he will command—and deserves—a significant raise from the $600,000 he made in ‘08-’09, and will deserve every penny of it. He’s only going to get better, and with every team needing good offensive defensemen, we’d be wise to lock him up now. Taking a look at our defense, keeping him together with Paul Martin will be critical in the coming years.
Travis Zajac
Zajac is set to become a restricted free agent, and Lou has already said he will make every effort to sign him long term. He and Zach Parise are our one-two punch of the future, and he should be treated and signed as such. His play dropped off toward the end, but early on in the season, he really broke free from his sophomore slump, and as he ages his play will become more consistent. With his new contract, however, he should be given a gym membership. He really needs to get stronger to become more effective.
Brian Gionta
I have nothing against Gionta, but this is a conditional “keep,” the condition being how much money he wants. Lou will have his maximum value set well in advance, and should Gionta want more, we can use his cap room for better things, while giving offensive youngsters like Nicklas Bergfors the chance to finally prove themselves in the proper environment, i.e. NOT 6 minutes a night on the fourth line, as was the case early this year. Gionta is a tireless worker who needs to produce more, but if he stays at the right price, it will be worth giving him that chance.
John Madden
This is another conditional “keep,” and for the same reason. Madden is one of the best defensive forwards in the game, an alternate captain, and an all-around team player. He is without a doubt one of our core players who must be re-signed, but only at the right price. Unfortunately, Jay Pandolfo is making $2.5 mil per year, which may dictate what Madden will ask for. It is hard to believe Madden and Gionta will both be back, but individually it should depend on how what they want will fit into our cap structure.
Andy Greene
An upcoming RFA, Greene has followed up a potential-filled first year with a couple of steadily improving performances. Greene is a keeper as long as he will not be relied upon to play like a top-four defensemen. Andy Greene is a third-pairing defensemen at best, and should be paid as such. No need to break the bank on him, if he really thinks he’s worth more then let him go, but as a member of the 5-6 pair on defense, you can’t do much better.
Mike Rupp
Rupp is in a conditional state as well. Pierre-Luc Leblond has emerged as a replacement, and although Rupp has the size advantage, Leblond may prove to be cheaper. Time will tell, but I am fine with either one of these two players or both returning. Someone needs to give David Clarkson some backup.
Petr Vrana
Like Nicklas Bergfors, Vrana deserves to play in the role he was designed for, which is not low-minute nights on the fourth line. Sign him and keep a spot for him open, especially if John Madden will not be returning. Vrana has always been called a mini-Madden, and if John thinks he’s worth more money than we’re offering, now would be the perfect time to begin grooming Vrana for the role long-term.
(note: Vrana has reportedly signed with a contract to go play in the Czech League, therefore taking him out of the situation. It's too bad, I really think this was the year he made the team for good.)
Kevin Weekes
You were waiting for this one, weren’t you? Which goalie to keep when both are UFA’s? Weekes will require less money, and is the ultimate teammate when he’s not playing. Unlike Clemmensen, he has no delusions of being a starter anymore. Clemmensen, meanwhile, has played phenomenal, but wants to become a full-time starter now, and that opportunity cannot come in New Jersey. I will say this, however: if Clemmensen is willing to sign on as Marty’s full-time backup again, then I would keep Clemmensen instead. I just doubt that is going to happen
Pierre-Luc Leblond
I love what Leblond brought to the lineup this year, and I think he is on the verge of becoming a full-timer. He is most likely a cheaper option than Mike Rupp, and should be signed long-term. Leblond will prove to be a key building block for the future.
Ditch
Niclas Havelid
Havelid is, by far, the worst trade deadline acquisition in Devils history. Sure, it looked good at the time, but he just never fit in on this team. Always out of position, always making stupid plays that you wouldn’t expect a veteran to make. I will personally drive him to the airport if it means he never has to appear in a Devils uniform again for the rest of time.
(note: Havelid has signed a contract to play in Sweden next year. Thank you dear god.)
Bobby Holik
It’s time for Holik to inform the post office that his mail is to no longer be forwarded to the Devils penalty box. His stupid penalties cost us far too many times this year, and if we honestly expect to have a better fate next season, there’s no way he can be part of that.
(note: Holik has officially retired. He knew all along he wasn't coming back apparently.)
Scott Clemmensen
You can read the explanation above under why we should keep Kevin Weekes, but I will summarize by saying that if Clemmensen decides he is willing to return as Marty’s backup, I’d rather keep him. I just don’t believe he is willing to do that.
Brendan Shanahan
I put him here because he’s probably going to retire anyway, but also because we’re a very old team right now, and that’s how you get yourself into salary cap trouble. I loved the concept of Shanahan coming back for this year to help us make a run, but now we need to start getting younger like everyone else. If, at the end of the summer, we have the cap room to bring him back for one more season, however, I am not opposed to it.
Disclaimer
Let me just clarify that I do not expect every single player on the keep list to return next season. Many of them are on there because they should be considered for being kept, but with the salary cap situation the way it is, all of them will not be brought back, nor should they. For example, Madden is on there because it would be great if he stays, but Vrana is up there because it’s very likely that Madden will choose to leave. So interpret the list with caution.
So now that we did all that, what do we need to add to make the 2010 Devils even better? The key is defense, defense, defense. If this year taught us anything, it’s that you cannot rely on a group of minor-leaguers to fill out an NHL defense. Our top four of Martin, Oduya, Salvador, and White were capable, but those last two spots need a serious upgrading. It’s not that Mottau played bad, but our top six needs to be stronger and more talented. I would focus my efforts this summer on signing a veteran stalwart defenseman, who can give our backline a higher profile. Stay-at-home or puck-mover, it doesn’t really matter. The bottom line is that any effort in free agency should be spent on making our defense corps far better.
Other than that, I like the pieces we have, and as long as some of those prospects that have been stewing in the minors for four or five years finally get the chance to prove themselves, I don’t think we need to do a whole lot else.
All FanPosts and FanShots are the respective work of the author and not representative of the writers or other users of In Lou We Trust.
0 recs |
13 comments
Comments
Clemmenson should be kept.
I would keep Scott Clemmenson and have a competition between him and Brodeur for the number 1 spot.. I know are you CRAZY!!!! I just believe competition is a healthy thing and with Marty getting up there in age he is more injury prone and his statistics could drop. If Scott is given the opportunity to beat out Brodeur he may stay with the Devils and be here if something happens to Marty like last season…
Donald Vasquez
by don_vas on May 31, 2009 6:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with this sentiment, but Im not holding my breath…
by drhgzang on May 31, 2009 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Id keep Oduya and Gionta (Zajac is obviously going to signed the question is years and dollars) but I think Madden needs to go (Id love it if Pandolfo went with him). The Devils will continue to as you put it, “sit back as if they still had the likes of Stevens and Daneyko to save the day” as long as these two are on the team. Sutter rarely matched lines in the regular season but low and behold game 1 there’s Madden out there almost every time Staal is out there.
by drhgzang on May 31, 2009 7:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I wasn't a huge fan of line matching in the playoffs either,
but you have to admit, the Staal line killed the ZZ Pops line when we were on the road.
by Mandmeisterx on Jun 1, 2009 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree, though I don’t think it was the Madden line who got burned, but the Parise-Zajac-Langenbrunner unit seemed to suffer more from the line matching. I felt Madden and Pandolfo were fine overall.
With respect to coaching tactics, those are easier to change than players, I feel. I think Sutter won’t make the same mistake in 2009-10 in New Jersey
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Jun 1, 2009 8:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed on that (Staal line vs ZZ Pops) but I wouldve tried Elias and Gionta who are both really solid two-way players. I agree with John, Madden and Pandolfo didnt play poorly but by constantly matching them up it allowed Carolina to dictate the game. I think the Devils had more talent up front than Carolina so why not dictate the play yourself?
by drhgzang on Jun 1, 2009 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let me see if I get this straight.
Brodeur needs to compete for his job and he’s now more injury prone? After one injury? And the competition is going to come from Scott Clemmensen.
You’re right, THIS IS CRAZY.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on May 31, 2009 7:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
By the way
Good overview, I was referring to the first comment on that. Honestly, I don’t think both Madden and Gionta stays. Madden may take a discount, but Gionta certainly won’t.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on May 31, 2009 7:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
goalie competition..
I am not saying Clemmenson would beat out Brodeur I am not that crazy. I just believe given the opportunity to compete would maybe keep Scottie in New Jersey. He did a very good job when Brodeur was out last year and I would feel more comfortable with him as the backup than Weekes. I am not saying this will happen though..
Donald Vasquez
by don_vas on May 31, 2009 11:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
id love if madden stays, but if shanny retires a player from lowell should be brought up instead of signing someone new.
by skly27 on Jun 1, 2009 2:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Offense, Offense, Offense
What more needs to be said. They need scorers. How much better would Parise be if he had someone to help him put up points. Malkin makes Crosby better. We need someone that will back the defense off the blue line. We were an average dump and chase team, and a less than average puck handling offensive threat.
Our defense is fine, now that Hevelid is in another country, so lets focus on putting the pucks in the back of the net. The last time we were in contention we did have Stevens and Dano, but we also had Arnott/Sykora/Elias. They lit the lamp night after night. I don’t think Dano and Stevens would be as effective in the current NHL. They were clutch/grab/punish players. That style of game is dead. There were too many games down the stretch where we failed to score more than 1 or 2 goals. Without a goal scorer it’ll be the same year after year. I’m tired of watching our inability to score in the playoffs. It’s pathetic. Madden can’t hit the net, Elias loves hitting the goalie right in the crest, and Clarkson thinks the only move is the wrap around. If this means no more Madden, Pando, Gionta, Elias, Rolston, Clarkson, whomever, then so be it. We have to move forward and get someone that will put fear into opposing D’s.
by the imp on Jun 2, 2009 3:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think the Devils were very much in contention in 2003, and that was a Devils team that was poor at scoring and atrocious on the power play.
In any case, Parise wasn’t the only one putting up points this past season. Elias had a point per game season, Langenbrunner had career numbers, and Zajac bounced back from a poor sophmore season. Even Gionta tallied career highs in assists. Yeah, another sniper would be great; but it’s not as if the Devils were pathetic in scoring goals. In this past season, they did average 2.90 goals, their highest average since 2005-06 (2.84/game) and the closest they came to 3 goals per game since 2000-01 (3.60/game).
Don’t get me wrong, more scoring is always good – but I don’t think it is as critical as the defense, especially with the real possibility that Oduya may want to go elsewhere.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Jun 2, 2009 5:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
In my opinion, the greatest need the Devils have this offseason is a legitimate second line centre. Zubrus is not cutting it, and Elias’ potent scoring talent is wasted playing with someone who cannot get him the puck consistently.
Henrik Sedin will be prohibitively expensive, especially if he insists on playing with his twin. Camalleri will also receive insane offers from other GMs, but I don’t see any better options on the UFA market, certainly no one capable of playing in the top six. My feeling is that we should make Camalleri a $4-5M offer, any more than that and he is not worth it.
A less orthodox method would be an offer sheet to an RFA on a team in cap trouble. They are unlikely to match even a low offer and so compensation will be manageable. Hudler on Detroit and Kessel on Boston spring to mind, but there are probably more I haven’t thought of. I’m uneasy with the idea of throwing around offer sheets, though; it just invites trouble in future years.
The above two scenarios necessitate the departure of Madden and Gionta to make the cap space to sign free agents. Rolston would move up to second line RW. Another possibility is moving Rolston to centre and keeping Gionta. In this case, if Gionta does not re-sign, Bergfors will finally get a real chance at making the top six.
As for the defence, I am not as worried. The defence didn’t perform up to expectations in the playoffs, but I thought the lack of secondary scoring hurt us more when the ZZPops line was shut down. During the regular season, we were in contention for the Jennings until the late season choke job, and that was with Clemmensen in goal for the majority of the season.
Obviously, re-signing Oduya is a priority. I see his contract running us somewhere around $3-4M, any more than that and we have to regretfully let him walk. The defender I believe Lou should target heavily is Beauchemin from Anaheim. He will likely come cheaper than he normally would because he is coming off an injury, and he is a massive upgrade over Mottau or Greene. Another possibility is Bergeron from Minnesota. If Oduya does not re-sign I think Lou should push to sign both defencemen, preferably for under $2-3M each. I also want to see Corrente get a legitimate opportunity at the bottom pairing. Ideally there will be competition between Mottau, Greene and Corrente for the last spot. If the right signings are made it may even make some of the extra defencemen available as trade bait for more help up front if we can’t sign a proper centre.
Ideally we should re-sign Clemmensen as our backup goaltender, but he has the potential to be a starter elsewhere and I don’t think we should deny him the opportunity. Weekes is a serviceable backup, happy with his role, and by all accounts, a great teammate. He should be retained for $750K or less.
To review: I think we should keep Zajac ($2-3M), Oduya ($3-4M), Leblond ($525K), Weekes ($500K-1M) and depending on circumstances, Greene ($1-2M) and Gionta ($3-4M). Madden, Holik, Havelid, Rupp and Clemmensen should be cut loose. Regarding Shanahan, I am in between. Clearly the old man can still rake, so if he can be had for a cheap one year deal I would not be against it. But he is not a must sign like Oduya and Zajac. Bergfors and Corrente should get a real shot at cracking the lineup. On the UFA market we should make strong efforts to sign Camalleri ($4-5M), Beauchemin ($1-2M), and Bergeron ($1-2M). Before anyone jumps on me about these numbers: They are estimates based on what I think the player is worth, I highly doubt all the players I have suggested will fit under the cap, but that is for Lou to figure out. Some of the moves I have suggested are contradictory too, for example if Rolston moves to RW on the second line Bergfors is staying in the AHL.
In my fantasy world, here are your 2009-2010 Devils:
Parise-Zajac-Langenbrunner
Elias-Camalleri-Rolston
Pandolfo-Zubrus-Clarkson
Leblond-Pelley-Bergfors
Beauchemin-Martin
White-Oduya
Salvador-Bergeron
Brodeur
Weekes
Sorry, that was a manifesto, but I got all my thoughts about the offseason out. Thanks for your patience.
One more useless post brought to you
by Saugus on Jun 6, 2009 6:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 















