FA Defensemen & the Devils: Nick Boynton & Karlis Skrastins
e first unrestricted free agent defenseman I took a look at was Florida's Jay Bouwmeester. The highly skilled young stud defenseman who is about to get a ridiculous amount of money this summer. However, he is not the only Panther defenseman available through free agency. Nick Boynton, Karlis Skrastins, and Jassen Cullimore are unrestricted free agents as well. With many of the "big names" already reviewed, taking a look at players like these three are still worthwhile to take a look at. Under the radar free agents, if you will. The worst that happens is that we learn that they would be terrible signings and knowing that isn't really a negative.
Now, before getting into the "headline players," I have a few quick thoughts about Jassen Cullimore. He's real cheap, as he made $830,000 last season. He's massive at 6'5", 220 pounds, and he has plenty of experience at age 36. Whale4ever rates him pretty well as a fill-in player for the Panthers in this past season. However, he's old (36), he's not a scorer by any means, and he's mainly a third pairing defenseman, as he only averaged 16:47 of ice time in this past season. Moreover, the shots against per 60 in even strength situations rises from 31.1 to 32.2 when Cullimore hits the ice, according to Behind the Net. Given that the Devils don't need another third pairing caliber defenseman, I don't think Cullimore should be considered.
Now that is out of the way, let's talk about super stars Nick Boynton and Karlis Skrastins!
Nick Boynton is a player who just screams "second pairing." As an up-and-coming defenseman through Boston, with rising point totals of 18, 24, and 30 in his first three full seasons, you'd think Boynton would develop into a solid two-way defenseman. Unfortunately, his career never ended up that way. He has yet to come close to the 30 point plateau since 2003-04. Since that career year in points, his shots on goal have dramatically dropped. He moved on to Phoenix and then ended up in Florida as part of the Olli Jokinen deal.
While he put up more points in Florida this past season than he did in Phoenix, apparently he and the coach, Peter DeBoer did not get along. Whale4Ever at Litterbox Cats notes that his relationship with him is "toast." I don't know what the situation was on that or what started it; yet it makes me wonder about how Boynton's personality would fit on the team. More distressingly, he also notes that Boynton's temper also gets him into penalty trouble. That's always a problem for any player, especially a defenseman. The numbers back this up as in every season he has played in, he has had at least 90 penalty minutes. Personally, I like my defensemen disciplined because A) you can't make plays in the box and B) you're actually helping the opposition out by putting your side temporarily down a man.
Other numbers regarding Boynton's 2008-09 season are also worrisome. He played an average of 16:35 per game, which is the lowest among regular defensemen on Florida - even less time than Jassen Cullimore. I'm sure his relationship with DeBoer had something to do with it; but even before any blow ups, was he getting significant minutes? The even strength numbers on Boynton at Behind the Net may have been affected by this development as well. Boynton played against the weakest quality of competition on the team last season and the goals against per 60 minutes rose from 2.16 to 2.66 when Boynton did make it to the ice. Ouch. In his favor, though, the goals for per 60 minutes also rose from 2.32 to 2.92 when Boynton was out there. Moreover, the shots for and shots against per 60 made positive developments with Boynton on the ice - the shots for rose from 25.5 to 27.7 and the shots against fell from 32.2 to 31.4. Of course, keep in mind this is against relatively, statistically weak competition as well as with relatively, statistically strong teammates - the second best on the team behind Bouwmeester.
In any case, the scouting report on his player page as well as the scouting report by the Hockey Writers (found via this post at Litterbox Cats) both claim Boynton as a second pairing defenseman or a top 4 defenseman. I don't doubt that the man has the tools to do so. I don't doubt that he can be physical and aggressive (though is 52 hits in 68 games a sign of being "physical?"), which can be positives. However, the amount of penalty minutes, the lack of ice time (again, that could have been DeBoer, but who knows), and that he's not putting up the points like he did in Boston or coming up with big stops all give me pause. All this for just under $3 million? Which he may get about that or more on the market next year?
I'm not really sold on Boynton as a potential signing. If he was, say, 27 like Mike Komisarek and he had these issues, it wouldn't worry as much as he could still learn to fix those errors. Boynton's 30 and I doubt he's going to become a much better player in the future. What you see is what you get, I fear, and I think the Devils could do better. I think they can accomplish that with an older Latvian defender from Florida:
The best way I can put it is what was quoted at Litterbox Cats from the Hockey Writers about Skrastins. It sums up his assets and issues are. The man is a block machine with 171, 9th most in the league. He played plenty with Bouwmeester, so he understands the role of being the more defensive man on the pairing. He is a defensive defenseman, so one should not expect a lot of points and shots (that stat line you see up there? Career high in points); but he is pretty good at it as well as staying out of the box.
The even strength numbers at Behind the Net seem to agree as far as the goals per 60 stats go. Overall, Skrastins faced the second highest relative quality of competition last season, just behind Bouwmeester; yet he also has a relatively low quality of teammates value. This may explain why the shots against per 60 rose from 31.1 to 34.0 when Skrastins comes on the ice. His presence on the ice does not tend to lead to more offense in response, as the shots for per 60 minutes fall from 26.6 to 25.2; and the goals for per 60 minutes falls from 2.55 to 2.42. Yet, the goals against per 60 minutes favor Skrastins on the ice, with the goals against dropping from 2.45 to 2.15. Maybe the increase in shots aren't necessarily quality shots? In any case, unlike Boynton, Skrastins has these numbers against relatively strong opposition and not always with the best teammates on the ice. That's a big mitigating factor.
Moreover, Skrastins can handle the minutes at age 34. He averaged 20:33 per game with the Panthers last season and he didn't take a break when the Panthers missed the postseason. No, he went on to not just join, but to lead Latvia at the World Championships. OK, Latvia didn't exactly light the world on fire at the 2009 WCs but he did average 20:02 of ice time and finished with a goal, an assist, and a +2 for a team that made it to the Quarterfinals and finished seventh overall. The man has endurance and there's no reason to believe he'll be short of breath next season.
There is a reason to believe he'll be short of speed, though. Skrastins never was all that fast and the scouting profile on his page says he does struggle with swift players. While it's not new to him anymore, the East features the likes of Alexander Ovechkin, Sidney Crosby, and Mike Richards (just to name a few). He'll continue to be up against fast players one way or another and it could very well become a problem. At age 34, he's not going to be come a faster, swifter, or more explosive player - and he won't as he turns 35, either. The Devils can probably compensate for some of that given their propensity for backchecking and keeping defenders back. Yet, it's one concern I have about the player. Which is a relief in comparison to the multiple ones I have for Boynton.
Oh, and the money. Yes, he's made $2.4 million, but he's not going to get a whole lot more than that at age 34. He could be a good bargain should the Devils need to sign a more than competant defensive defenseman. That could happen if they swing and miss on a number of higher-profile free agents and have to go after whoever is left. Skrastins for about $2 million for 1-2 years wouldn't be a bad deal should such a scenario arise.
Still, do I think he could step into the Devils' top 4 and be better than Mike Mottau? Sure, why not? Skrastins didn't get burned over and over with Florida. He's willing to use his body, he's faced top competition before, and he can definitely handle 18-20 minutes. He won't fill the need for more offense, however. He would be another defensive defenseman who isn't all that fast. While he won't fill any major needs and I don't think the Devils should actively persue him, he could be a decent signing in the right circumstances. I prefer him over Boynton, really.
As always, have your say below. Do you think I'm being too harsh on Nick Boynton? Do you think I'm not being harsh enough on Karlis Skrastins? Do you have any other suggestions for free agent defensemen who warrant a look? I plan on ending this feature this week as I'm starting to run out of players who I can't sum in up in one sentence. Share your thoughts in the comments below.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I’m fine with Bergeron and Beachemin. Bergeron and Beauchemin could come cheap and Bergeron has a great shot and Beauchemin is a good offensive / defensive defenseman. They will be a great signing if they could get both. I don’t see why the Devils should consider Boynton or Skrastins. But if the Devils want to sign a good center for Gio he signs that Devils will probably have to chose one of them. I would personally pick Bergeron. He is the type of offensive defenseman the devs need and it could come cheap. And who else knows how to teach defense more then the Devils???
I don’t see why the Devils should consider Boynton or Skrastins.
Same reason why they would consider Bergeron, Beauchemin, or even Backman. Because they are available and they aren’t marginal players in the league. I agree that Bergeron and Beauchemin would be good signings (I said as such yesterday), but to just end it with them is tunnel vision.
With free agency, someone you might not expect to be a good signing may actually end up being signed and I would think a little heads up on the potential targets would be better than just hoping for one, two, or even three players.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
Ive always liked Skrastins, he’s always been one of the leaders in blocked shots, and I think he’d be a good fit. Never really thought much of Boynton, always knew he was out there and decent but nothing special. The numbers above though make him look terrible, there are a number of better free agents out there (Beauchemin, Bergeron, Ohlund, Skrastins) that are worth Lou’s time and effort.
Well if you want to sign Bergeron or anyone else there is no need for another defenseman. That is what I meant to say. I would sign a good center to replace Holik or call someone up. Or even Madden. If you want to replace Mottau and Greene… Atleast sign two good defenseman and a good center for Gionta.
Screw the D we need a C!
John, while i appretiate these in-depth looks at available D-men, I think the Devils largest concern, especially going froward into a non-trapping style is a play making center! They have none right now. Who they bring in will dictate the course of play for the entire 2009-210 season.
Right now they need to make decisions about Gionta and Madden. Gionta is all put useless without a play making center because he can not create his own opportunities and madden, as much as I love him may not be the asset he once was to the team if they keep moving in a newer direction.
I’d love to see you do an in depth look on who’s available and a great fit down the middle for the Devils.
my personal opinion is it’s time to let Madden go and move Zubrus to checking center and tell him to “TAKE MORE SHOTS”!
Then there’s Gio which is a tough one because like I said he can’t play with out a good passer, but if you keep him and go after one, what do you do with Rolston again? Bad season and all Rolston should be on the 2nd line, not a checking line. I think it’s time to let Gionta go, let Rolston slide over to RW with Elias on the LW, leaving money to bring in a better center… both are much better at creating their own scoring opportunities and will probably get better mileage out of anyone stuck between them even if it’s two-way center and not strictly a play maker. Gionta seems lost with out Gomez, he needs to play with a true passer to be effective.
I implore you wrap up the D men (as you’re at table scraps already) and hit up the centers!
Well like I said at the end of this one...
I plan on ending this feature this week as I’m starting to run out of players who I can’t sum in up in one sentence.
There are a few more I want to do, but yeah, I’ll be ending this on Friday with a surprise notion. Then the next week or so will be centers. Maybe only one or two weeks because A) there’s a Draft coming up and B) the need at center is a bit more specific.
For centers, there’s not a lot of names that stick out to me, so I’m going to put up a FanPost wherein you all can suggest centers to your hearts content and I’ll try to do those first.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
I agree but the Devils really need is an offensive defenseman. Answer= Marc- Andre Bergeron.
The Devils should let go Madden because he didn’t have a great season like he did last year. I really didn’t see any two on one with pando on the penalty kill this year and I think he’s slowing down. We got Holik’s salary or 2.5 million on the table and Madden’s money. That is enough to sign M. A. Bergeron and a good center for Gionta. I agree ever since Gomez left, we have seen a different Brian Gionta.
D men and C men
zelepukin i agee 100% with your suggestions regarding what the devils need and what should be done regarding every player you named…yes, a playmaking center is what they need and maybe they could get jiri hudler from the red wings who will be up against the salary cap…no, they won’t get him for barry tallackson, but their first round draft pick and a real prospect like bergfors or corrente might work for both sides, it would give the devils two real scoring lines with two real playmaking centers, something they haven’t had since gomez departed…maybe the devils couldn’t get him for what i’ve suggested, but i am trying to be realistic here, as an RFA hudler would have to be signed, i imagine for the same type of money that zajac is going to get…any comments?
by don in central jersey on Jun 2, 2009 6:04 PM EDT reply actions
Why would the Devils give Detroit draft picks and extra money to sign Hudler? He’s good, but not that good.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
hudler
well, if the devils sign him as an RFA, without detroit’s permission, so to speak, they’d owe the wings perhaps a prohibitive amount of draft choices, no?
by don in central jersey on Jun 2, 2009 7:31 PM EDT reply actions
hudler
sorry i haven’t made myself clear…what i’m suggesting is that, with hudler’s knowledge and consent, the wings sign hudler to a 3 year deal, at RFA prices, similar to what zajac will get, and then trade him to the devils for the type of deal that i’ve suggested above
by don in central jersey on Jun 2, 2009 8:16 PM EDT reply actions

by 

















