Poll: Do You Want Lemaire as the Devils Coach?
The big rumor being pushed for the Devils head coaching position is Jacques Lemaire. Here's a quick overview of Lemaire's coaching career. Lemaire coached the Devils from the 1993-94 season through 1997-98 season, finishing with a record of 199-122-57. He (in)famously instituted the neutral zone trap and after an Eastern Conference Finals appearance in 1994 and a Stanley Cup win in 1995, the rest of the NHL caught wind of the defensive tactic. While Lemaire achieved regular season success with the Devils, two quick exits from the playoffs led to his replacement in 1998.
Lemaire returned to the NHL coaching the expansion Minnesota Wild, still favoring defensive hockey throughout his tenure. He stepped down after this past season, where the Wild missed the playoffs after two consecutive seasons of making it in the postseason. Hockey Wilderness was all over this: Buddhafisch has details about when he actually stepped down in April with some interesting quotes. Nathan Eide has a link to a retrospective and his last press conference.
According to Gulitti, Lemaire is interested in the New Jersey job; though he also rumored to be taking a consulting job with the Canadiens. Given what Lemaire has done, he's definitely a defense-first coach and would probably undo a lot of what Sutter had done in the last two seasons. On the other hand, Lemaire never coached a team where he had a ridiculous talent like Zach Parise, Travis Zajac working well with said ridiculous talent, and Patrik Elias putting up a point per game season. Maybe he would do things differently. I say for now, I leave the opinion to you.
Remember, I'm not asking whether or not he would be good for New Jersey; but rather do you want him to coach the Devils in 2009-10. If you would like to explain why you do or do not want him to coach the Devils, please state your reasons in the comments.
UPDATE: Good response so far and I would like to commend you all for not wanting to see Todd Richards. Because according to Mike Russo at the Star Tribune, he will be coaching the Wild next season. (via Hockey Wilderness) Also from Mike Russo, Lemaire is working on a basement closet. Best of luck to him in his endeavor for more storage space.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The funny thing about all this is, with the way Lou tends to operate; media silence and all that, Lemaire running his mouth about wanting the job almost guarantees he won’t be the new head coach.
I don’t want Lemaire back for a few reasons. For one, I don’t believe his coaching style would work in the current NHL atmosphere. I also want some stability in the coaching job for once. We’ve had something like four coaches in five years, and we want to put a 64 year old (who really should be retired) in there? Get a younger, hungrier coach who won’t get homesick and pull a Sutter.
One more useless post brought to you
I don’t want him. I know defense wins games and championships but… When you have Zach Parise, Travis Zajac, Patrik Elias, Jamie, Rolston, etc. Its not the smartest thing to do when both are young and put up points.Mike Haviland or Peter Laviolette. Laviolette is an offensive coach and resembles Sutter.
100% Agreed
If Lemaire tries to impose his strangling system, Zach Parise’s production will plummet, and he will bolt for free agency the second he gets the chance. Haviland and Laviolette are both excellent choices. The only way Lemaire works as a head coach here is if he implements a system based around the skill of our forwards. And let’s be real, it’s Jacques Lemaire. Don’t count on that happening.
by thejerseydevil on Jun 15, 2009 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions
asst.
he should be asst. coach.it would greatly improve the power play,i noticed his teams always have good power plays but his overall stratagey is out dated.
by Imperator_Celtic on Jun 15, 2009 1:16 PM EDT reply actions
That could work
He’d make a great assistant who can focus on the defensive side of the game, provided it fits within someone else’s forecheck-based system. I’m sure he wouldn’t agree to that, but there is a system that could work.
by thejerseydevil on Jun 15, 2009 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Great
If you have Lemaire as an assistant coach that means Johnny Mac could go down to Lowell for some coaching experience. You could bring in a head coach hire him to a 2 year contract. If Johnny Mac does great than hire him as head coach. If he doesn’t give him more time. Don’t bring in Lemaire to be a heac coach he wouldn’t fit with the new NHL.
If Lemaire is to rejoin the Devils, I should hope it is in an advisory or assistant coaching role. He would be a great mentor for a young head coach who would be retained long term. I just want to see an end to the game of musical chairs that Lou seems to have going with the coaching position. Get some stability behind the bench, have a set coaching philosophy that the players can buy into, and then let’s see if this team can’t make a deep run in the playoffs.
One more useless post brought to you
On the contrary, the '94-'95 team was very offensively talented
“On the other hand, Lemaire never coached a team where he had a ridiculous talent like Zach Parise, Travis Zajac working well with said ridiculous talent, and Patrik Elias putting up a point per game season.”
I feel like there is a common misperception that the Devils never had any offensive talent prior to, like, 2000. (I kind of think it’s because ‘95 was a pretty long time ago, now, and a lot of current fans probably weren’t around then or during the green, red and white era, but that’s neither here nor there.) The ‘94-’95 Devils had Stephane Richer, John MacLean, Neil Broten, Bill Guerin, Brian Rolston, a 29 year old Claude Lemieux, Scott Neidermayer, and a 30 year old Scott Stevens (22 pts in 48 regular season games played on the blueline) on the roster, and some other players like Zelepukin and Chorske (a burner) who could chip in on offense. I think that team won because Lou put together a very strong and interesting mix of veterans and youngsters and because Lemaire got a lot of pretty talented players to buy into a defense-first system. They had the talent to put pucks in the net when given the opportunity, but they played a disciplined style and won because they sacrificed some scoring opportunities in exchange for a winning defensive system.
Now, to answer the question… No, I don’t want Lemaire behind the bench in 2009-‘10. Two reasons – I’d prefer the Devils go out and find a more long-term solution (and I like the idea of a younger, hungrier coach), and I don’t think Lemaire’s defensive style is best-suited to the personnel on the Devils anymore. But it’s not because I think offensive players can’t win in his system or that his style is best-suited to a team with less offensive talent. It’s because I don’t think the current defensive personnel is as strong as it was in the ‘90s and I’d rather see the Devils play to their strengths, which still include defense but not like it did in the 90s. I think Lemaire’s system is better suited to a more physical team with a stronger presence on the blueline, I just don’t think it would be the best route to victory for this current group.
I don't want Lemaire because I don't think the Devils
have the best personnel to play Lemaire’s style. If they wind up with an Oduya-Martin pairing again going into the year, I don’t see them as being the best fit for a Lemaire-coached team.
I’d much rather see Laviolette. He’s still my first choice. At the same time, we all know Lemaire is a very good coach who will probably bring some good discipline back to the team.
by Tyler Bleszinski on Jun 15, 2009 5:36 PM EDT reply actions
Lemaire brought us the cup.
Lemaire brought us the cup with his defensive system which by the way Lou favors. I myself do not want Lemaire as coach because that would be a step backwards. I do not like any of the choices out here enough to keep Lou from going in house for Mclean. I foresee Lou going for someone from Montreal which usually seems to be his route when choosing a coach. Carbonneau happens to be available right now. I just hope that he does not even thinks about Mike Keenan. Laviolette made the Islanders better but when he left the Hurricanes this year they became a better team. It will be interesting to see which way he goes.
Donald Vasquez
I think Tippett is legit
and runs a pretty sound defensive system, but not the Lemaire stranglehold. I really think he got the raw end of the deal there. I’d be surprised if he’s on the market a long time.

by 











