In Lou We Trust: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Along The Olentangy for Ohio State Fans!

SBN Mock Draft Pick: Calvin de Haan for NJ

Today was the day for the Devils to make their selection in the SBN Mock Draft pick.  So I looked over the overviews I have done so far, considered who was already taken, considered who was available, and made the selection of defenseman Calvin de Haan.  I summed up my reasoning with this short blurb (yeah, I had to write something concise, I know, rare):

Calvin de Haan is a slick skating, offensive-defenseman who thrived all season in Oshawa – with and without John Tavares. His best assets include his intelligence, his ability to move the puck up ice, and his calm approach to the game, even in pressure situations.

De Haan was the second prospect I did an overview for, after Kyle Palmieri, who was my second choice for the pick. Among the prospects I have dug up information for so far - and I plan to do at least two more before Friday, most likely: Simon Despres and Drew Shore Louis Leblanc (I changed my mind) - I became the most interested in these two.  

Star-divide

Truth be told, I am still asking the same questions about Palmieri as I did at the end of my overview on him: he can skate, he's definitely strong, he's got a good work ethic, and he's proven that he can score.  I know he's small but I frankly don't care about that.  So why isn't he touted any higher than the bottom third of the first round? Is it truly character?

De Haan's skills, on the other hand, was just as enticing - but without any lingering questions. De Haan is a solid skater, he's solid moving the puck up ice, he's poised for a defender (and at 17, 18 years old, that's huge), and he continued to perform well be it in Oshawa with John Tavares, in Oshawa without John Tavares, and for Team Canada. The knock on him is his size and that's more in terms of muscle than in frame.  I'm confident he'll get stronger and he'll get better with experience.   In my view, that would make him the best player available.  That he fits the Devils' system need for puck-moving, offensive defensemen is just icing on the proverbial cake.

Incidentally, I rated Tim Erixon as the third best option behind them, with Dylan Olsen as a reach later on.  Carter Ashton, David Rundblad, Stefan Elliott, and Landon Ferraro were all taken ahead of NJ's spot in the mock, so I had no chance with them.

Anyway, I'll leave it to you all as to whether you all think I made a good pick.  In the meantime, check out these links as you get ready for Friday's NHL Draft.

And now, a poll.  Feel free to share all your draft-related, draft-party-related, and mock-draft-related comments in the comments section below.

 

Poll
Did you agree with my choice of Calvin de Haan in the SBN Mock Draft?
Yes. De Haan is a smart choice at #23
40 votes
No, you should have taken Kyle Palmieri
14 votes
No, you should have taken Tim Erixon
7 votes
No, you should have taken Dylan Olsen
1 votes
No, you should have taken someone else (specify in comments)
3 votes

65 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 11 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Good pick! I will be satisfied if the Devils draft him on Friday. We will have to wait and see what Lou pulls out of his hat!

by LetsGoDevils on Jun 23, 2009 9:04 PM EDT reply actions  

i voted ‘yes’ and while i’m not going to pretend that i know much about these players—i’m sure that most of you know way more than me—from what i’m reading he would be the best player available at that point, if indeed he is still available—and i’ve always felt that in the first round, at least, you should select the best player available and not draft according to your team’s most pressing need, which, for the devils i feel is a center

by don in central jersey on Jun 23, 2009 9:04 PM EDT reply actions  

True

In a few years, center may not be an issue should Patrice Cormier, David Wohlberg, and Adam Henrique (did Kory Nagy have a good year?) continue to develop. OK, they may not be impact, sure-fire #1/#2 centers; but those come at a premium anyhow.

I do agree that you don’t draft based on current need – that’s what free agency and trades are for, really.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Jun 23, 2009 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wouldn’t be upset with De Haan but I personally feel that if he’s available at 23 the Devils should take Palmieri. I not only think he’ll develop into a good and possibly great player but he’d be a hometown hero which would help the team from a marketing standpoint. Obviously the latter isn’t what you should base a draft pick on, but if these are the one and two to flip a coin over I feel it fair that it factor in somewhat.

by Zelepukin on Jun 23, 2009 9:14 PM EDT reply actions  

I voted other, not because De Haan is a bad choice at 23, but because Josefson was still on the board in this mock draft. I would be astonished if he was still available at that spot in the real draft this Friday, he’s consistently ranked much higher than that. But clearly he fell here, so it’s possible. I would be pleased if we ended up with De Haan, but jumping for joy if we got Josefson.

One more useless post brought to you

by Saugus on Jun 24, 2009 11:07 PM EDT reply actions  

Ooooooh, good catch.

Truth be told, there’s two pretty decent Josefson. D.O. did that very thing at Die by the Blade which even includes his “downside”; and Jim got the word on him from the sites I would have quoted anyhow at Blueshirt Banter.

There’s a lot to like about him, really. My only concern is that perhaps the upside for a first round forward shouldn’t be a third liner; but I would pleased if he was available. The odd thing about this year’s draft is that consensus is that there’s a lot of talent available, so it’s hard to gauge where some will end up. Mocks are all over the place beyond the top 10, from what I’ve seen so far.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Jun 24, 2009 11:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think Josefson’s upside is much higher than a third liner, I would say he’s easily a second liner. He is defensively responsible and willing to get physical, but he’s not primarily a defensive forward or a grinder. There’s a reason Central Scouting has him as the third ranked European skater in the draft, and McKenzie has him at #16 in his prospect rankings; compare that with De Haan at #23. He’s been compared to Zetterberg in terms of his style of play and is considered a low risk pick with decent reward.

But certainly there is talent to be had through the first round, this is a very deep draft and hopefully will go a long way to restocking the Devils’ farm system

One more useless post brought to you

by Saugus on Jun 25, 2009 12:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree I think Josefson should be or could be a 2nd line center. I would love if the Devils drafted him at 23 or even trade up to get him. He is a highly skilled player. He oculd maybe help Gionta if he stays and Josefson makes the team. Central Scouting does say that he is a good passer. Which Gionta needs. He is young, ranked 3rd in European skater right behind Hedman. If he plays like Zetterberg it would be a huge reward for being drafted at pick number 23. Still if Jacob gets picked before the Devils could get him, De Haan would be my second choice.

by LetsGoDevils on Jun 25, 2009 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Excellent

I would love to do a quick overview on Josefson but the problem is that, well, these two comments pretty much sum up what else is out there and that concerns me. Well, not your comments, just that it’s all positive stuff. I get that he’s a skilled center, he’s solid in both ends, and he can be physical. I’ve read nothing but positive things about him – and so I really wonder how he can slip at all. In some way that bothers me a little bit.

I mean, Carter Ashton, David Rundblad, and Simon Despres are projected to go higher than where NJ is, but they all have an issue of sorts. Something that they need to work on to improve, which is to be expected because if a prospect didn’t have any issue to work, wouldn’t they be #1? So what’s the knock on Josefson that could bring him so low?

I don’t think it can be just a lack of attention as CSS has him 3rd among European skaters, he played both in the U18s and WJCs for Sweden, and he featured for Djurgardens all season (which is a big accomplishment in of itself). Scouts definitely saw this guy and saw plenty of him. So…I’m trying to figure out how he could fall past 15 much less all the way to New Jersey?

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Jun 25, 2009 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t know how it will happen but if Lou trades up say to the 19th or 20th pick we have a better chance of picking him up. I really don’t want to see Lou trade down to get some stay at home defensive defenseman. I want a good young caliber center. I know he must have a some downside but he is still young and the Devils could improve him.

by LetsGoDevils on Jun 25, 2009 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Will it be De Haan or Josefson??? We will all see on Friday!

by LetsGoDevils on Jun 25, 2009 11:46 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the New Jersey Devils! New here? Check out the Rules and Guidelines before posting.
Start posting about the Devils »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

SBNation.com Recent Stories

NEWARK NJ - JULY 20:  Ilya Kovalchuk of the New Jersey Devils poses for photographs following the media opportunity announcing his contract renewal at the Prudential Center on July 20 2010 in Newark New Jersey.  (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images) +27 updates

Deal With The Devil: Ilya Kovalchuk Saga Over As League, NHLPA Agree On New Contract Rules

PHILADELPHIA - MAY 16:  A fan of the Philadelphia Flyers holds up a sign reading "Next Goalie" behind goalie Carey Price #32 of the Montreal Canadiens in Game 1 of the Eastern Conference Finals during the 2010 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs at Wachovia Center on May 16, 2010 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.  (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)

Habs Finally Lock Up Carey Price, Sign Goalie To Two-Year Deal

Photo +1 updates

Report: Donald Fehr Hands NHLPA List Of Conditions On Becoming Union Leader

More from SBNation.com >

joomla visitors

Managers

Stanley_cup_and_you_-_sbn_small John Fischer

Authors

N665754327_5889_small TibbsBeastoftheEast

Puddy_small Tom Stivali

Marty_sbetter_small Matthew Ventolo

J-roc_small Kevin Sellathamby