Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Replacing Brian Gionta: Can Brian Rolston Do it in 2009-10?

Yesterday, I brought up a potential issue for the summer of 2010. Let's scale back the focus of today's speculation to the upcoming season proper.   A few days ago, Puck Daddy had a story about Zajac re-signing with the Devils, avoiding arbitration.  Greg Wyshynski did link to an earlier post I written about recent Devils arbitration results - thanks for that, Greg - but, he mentioned something odd at the end of his post:

So with this out of the way, the Devils can start addressing their other pressing needs this offseason. Like clutch and grab drills for Lemaire. Like finding a winger to replace the points that skated away with Brian Gionta.

My first thought was, "Um, Greg, a ton of discussion on the blogs and message boards has been about how the Devils need a center.  And it's warranted.  As it is, the Devils only have 3 centers - Zajac, Zubrus, and Pelley.   Why would the Devils need a winger?"   But then I realized that he has a point - even though I don't think the Devils need a winger. Brian Gionta's shooting accuracy may have frustrated Devils fans in recent years, but his post-48-goal-season numbers aren't something to completely ignore:


 Seasons
GP G A P +/- PIM PPG SHG GWG GTG SOG PCT
2006-07 - Brian Gionta 62 25 20 45 -3
36 11 0 4 0 194 12.9
2007-08 - Brian Gionta 82 22 31 53 1 46 8 1 4 0 257 8.6
2008-09 - Brian Gionta 81 20 40 60 12 32 3 3 1 0 248 8.1

The initial player to take Gionta's old spot at right wing would be Brian Rolston, and he's a big reason why I and many other Devils fans don't see the Devils needing to get a scoring winger.  Rolston has had some of his best seasons as a winger, he played there in Minnesota under Jacques Lemaire, and he's enjoyed great success there.  In 2006-07 and 2007-08, Rolston in Minnesota even outscored Gionta: 31 goals and 64 points and then 31 goals and 58 points.  Yes, Rolston did struggle last season, hampered by an injury to start the 2008-09 season and then stuck on the third line since there was no room for him on the top two scoring lines.  


GP G A P +/- PIM PPG SHG GWG GTG SOG PCT
2008 - Brian Rolston 64 15 17 32 2 30 8 0 3 0 174 8.6

But on paper things look to be different.  First, there's a spot on a scoring line with Patrik Elias wide open for him at right wing. (I personally will not suggest using him as a center - see this post for why.)   Second, Rolston will re-unite with Lemaire.  Under his coaching, Rolston enjoyed his most productive seasons in his career and who's to say that won't happen again.  Third, there won't be any "settling" period for Rolston with the organization as he's been here for a season already.   Fourth, based on the strength of this quote, Rolston's got something to prove this season.

So Rolston on the second line and Gionta's numbers will be replaced, no problem, right?  Well, not so fast.  Here's some reasons to doubt that Rolston will automatically cover Gionta's numbers.

Star-divide

The first potential issue is age.  Brian Rolston is a skilled player, but he's not Martin Brodeur or Chris Chelios where he plays like age is truly just a number.   Rolston is 36 years old and it's entirely possible that his career is truly on the decline.  It's not that Rolston would be useless, but perhaps he may not be able to provide the production he could have, say,  3 or 4 years earlier with Minnesota.   Not that I can say whether that was true last season, but that possibility does exist.

The second potential issue is chemistry.  Yes, the two were on the same line to start 2008-09.  But it's not like he lit it up early with only one goal and assist in his first four games.  The early injury to Rolston snuffed that line; and after Rolston and Langenbrunner returned from injury, the top two lines were pretty much set last season.  So Rolston didn't get a lot of playing time with Elias last season in even strength. The two wingers weren't on the same power play unit most of the time, either.  Basically, if Rolston and Elias work well with each other, then Rolston can definitely match and surpass Gionta's numbers last season.  If they don't, well, not only will the offense suffer, but Lemaire's going to have some interesting line juggling.   This is a pretty big issue.

The third and a bit of a long shot of an issue is whether or not Rolston will get that spot.  If the Devils are serious about this youth movement, they may want to give a few other players a run out at a scoring line right wing.  Such as prospect Nicklas Bergfors, or even someone already on the roster, like David Clarkson.  I believe the spot is Rolston's to lose, but weirder things have happened before.

Truth be told, for the reasons stated earlier, I'm pretty confident in Rolston fitting in on a scoring line, continuing to drop bombs from the point on a power play.  Despite these potential issues, I think his production will certainly improve.  I think he can replace Gionta's 20 goals and probably add 5-10 more.   Whether or not he'll make up those 40 assists is a tall order.  Yet, I can't help but think that if Rolston is scoring and he's working well with his linemates (a big "if," admittedly), the points will come from someone on that line.  And so Rolston will better "earn" his money while the Devils remain a successful hockey team in 2009-10.

Vote in the poll, and leave your comments on whether Brian Rolston can or cannot replace what Brian Gionta did for the Devils.

Poll
Do you think Brian Rolston can replace Brian Gionta's spot on the Devils and his production?
Yes! Rolston can do what Gionta did!
235 votes
No! Rolston can't replace those numbers!
42 votes
Maybe! I can see it happen, but I'm not sure, really.
100 votes

377 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 7 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Rolston vs Gionta

Rolston will bounce back this year and score 30 goals. Put that in the bank. In addition he has a booming shot from the point. Rolston never quite bounced back from his injury, and never quite reached common ground with Sutter on how to be used. Rolston should get more time quarterbacking the PP this year.

 Look, I liked Gionta also, but Montreal paid LOUdicrous money to get him. If I thought that Gionta would ever see 40 goals again, then I could see the money, but he was not garnering the same attention from opposing teams when he scored 48, and he will never see the freedom he previously enjoyed again. Whe he did score 48 he was in front of the crease and got tons of tips, and now he gets moved out in a hurry and doesnt have the size to stop someone like Chara from clearing the front.

The upside of losing Gionta is Bergfors is ready and needs to get a shot, and not on the forth line either. Bergfors needs to see (and earn) quality minutes, and lets hope he turns into a 30 goal scorer in the future.. Halisuk showed some promise and I think he may make this team soon. In the pipeline we have some great talent coming in Vasyunov and Zharkov who may each see a little time this year if there are injuries, There is alot of talent behind them also that is probably 2 or 3 years away, and thier profiles give plenty of hope (http://www.hockeysfuture.com/teams/new_jersey_devils)

SO- sorry to see you go GIO, you were a good player for us.
Welcome aboard Bergfors and Halisuk, and Rollie please prove me right.

by pepe22 on Jul 24, 2009 9:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Gionta will have a great year with Montreal.

Gionta. will have a great year now that he is reunited with his buddy Gomez.. Playing in Montreals run and gun offense his speed will really show. I expect him to score at least 30-35 goals.

Donald Vasquez

by don_vas on Jul 28, 2009 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

i think there is no doubt he can replace him look at the games played last season there not that far apart already.what was montreal thinking 5 million?

by Imperator_Celtic on Jul 24, 2009 10:40 PM EDT reply actions  

In my opinion I dont really see rolston putting up the numbers that we all are hoping for. It would certainly be nice but I really dont see it happening. Age is HUGE set back. Age is also a issue for the whole team but that is a whole ‘nother can of worms. Chemistry wise I’m not too worried I think Elias is the type of player that he can gel with anybody he is lined up with. I do think they need a center. I dont think anyone who is a UFA is good enough get/spend the money on. I think if the devils want to make an impact this season they need a monumental trade. Look at all the years they have made big trades, I think we turned out pretty good those years.

by brodeurman89 on Jul 25, 2009 10:27 AM EDT reply actions  

Gio is uber-replacable

Bottom line. Gionta had his best year a long time ago. His peak is 20-25 goals. Rolston scored 15 goals in 20 games less than Gio. Playing on the 3rd/4th line. Assuming he stays healthy, and add in his obvious compatibility with Jacques, and he’s good for 25+ goals. Well worth the money Montreal gave Gio.

by hocke26 on Jul 26, 2009 2:45 AM EDT reply actions  

These are all fair points. I’m regretting my question, maybe a more question would be, who will better justify their $5 million/year deal, Gionta or Rolston!

I can see age being a big issue, brodeurman89. Perhaps it’s the biggest of all.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Jul 26, 2009 10:41 PM EDT reply actions  

What bounce back?

Rolston played 4 games in the beginning of the season and had 2 points. That would work out to 41 points in a full season, meaning that Rolston’s final performance was not that far off the mark after his injury. In addition, he did get a chance all season on the power play with the top 2 lines. He had 8 power play goals. For someone who was brought in to improve the power play, this is not sufficient. He also never gave Sutter any incentive to put him on the second line. Yes, chemistry is always an aspect of it, but Rolston never played smart hockey, which is something you have to do every time you are on the ice, regardless of who you are playing with! He made a ton of mistakes that led to turnovers and odd-man rushes for the other team. In fact, the only real contribution that he makes to the team is his 100 mph slapshot. He was slow last year, even before the injury, and he is now one year older.

In terms of the money issue, Bob Gainey attempted to buy himself a team that is going to be a Stanley Cup contender. Apparently he doesn’t recognize that it hasn’t worked for the Rangers in 15 years.

My belief is that the Devils should just keep Pandolfo and Rolston as healthy scratches on the roster (Pandolfo has lost a step or two as he has aged) and bring up some of the prospects to play at the higher level with an experienced star like Elias. The Devils will become much faster in doing so.

by NJPenguins08 on Jul 27, 2009 8:03 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the New Jersey Devils! New here? Check out the Rules and Guidelines before posting.

FanPosts

joomla visitors

Managers

Stanley_cup_and_you_-_sbn_small John Fischer

Authors

Puddy_small Tom Stivali

Marty_sbetter_small Matthew Ventolo

Trollvalchuk_small Kevin Sellathamby

Rex_ryan--300x300_small Josh Weinstein

1729_small Matt Evans SNC