Jacques Lemaire wants the New Jersey Devils to be a "Transition Team"
One of the biggest questions for the 2009-10 season is how new head coach Jacques Lemaire will have the team play. Will it be a trap? Will it be something else? Lemaire is most well-known for reviving the neutral zone trap in his first stint with the New Jersey Devils in the mid-1990s and the expansion Minnesota Wild over this past decade. I think this a big reason why some Devils fans are worried about Lemaire behind the bench. Prior to his signing, a poll here and the comments in that same post indicated that Lemaire would not be a good choice. Back when he was hired, I expressed my own concern that Lemaire would have the Devils take a step back from Sutter's style, which I felt worked very well last season.
Yet, these are all worries; we won't truly know what will happen until preseason at the earliest - and even what we see then could change by October. Nevertheless, two recent interviews had Lemaire hint at what his intentions are for the 2009-10 New Jersey Devils.
This past Thursday, Tom Gulitti had an extensive phone interview with Lemaire and Gulitti learned that Lemaire has studied how the 2008-09 Devils performed under Brent Sutter:
Q: You watched some film before you were hired (on July 13). Have you watched more since then to learn more about your veteran players?
Lemaire: "I have about 10 tapes. I looked at 10 different games just to see who plays with who and how the team was playing in general, more how the team played in general. I felt that (former coach Brent) Sutter did a very good job with the team and they were playing really well as a team.
The last sentence is assuring to fans like me who liked how the Devils were performing under Sutter. Lemaire recognized that they were successful. Hopefully, this would suggest that Lemaire may only tweak the system instead of implementing something completely different. I certainly wouldn't mind some small improvements or changes if it means the Devils will still earn most of their possession along the boards and still set up down low on offense. Of course, this is all really inference; Lemaire may just be complementing the Devils and Sutter and I'm reading too much into it.
Supporting that the first quote may not suggest anything, Lemaire answered a more direct question about how he wants the Devils to play in this recent Q&A Lemaire had at the Devils' newly-revamped official website:
Could you explain how you want the team to play this season and what the fans should look for on the ice?
Bill
Union, N.J.Lemaire: Everyone is saying that I’m really a defensively-focused coach, but I was looking at the Devils last year and I thought they were playing more defense than we were (in Minnesota). To win, and everyone knows this, you need solid defense. You need to be good in your own zone, and if you look at all the good teams – the teams that win – they play well in their own end, and that’s key. Secondly, you need some offense. We’re always working on offense, and every coach is trying to find ways, trying all kinds of drills with the players so they turn out to be better offensively. This is what we, as coaches, do a lot. Every practice we do drills to be better offensively; to be better going at the net; to be better at making plays in the offensive zone; to be better with our shots; to be better on the point at getting the puck to the net. What you’ll see is a good, solid team that plays at both ends of the ice. I want to try to create as much speed as possible, and be as much of a transition team as possible. That’s what people will see this year.
The emphasis is mine, but if you were concerned that Lemaire would use the trap, then this may be more evidence to have them. I don't have much of a problem with this answer up until the last sentence. I agree that a team has to succeed at both ends to be successful in today's NHL. You're foolish to suggest a team can win by only focusing on offense or defense. While the Devils website is promoting the interview by stating "Lemaire Plans Speed Game," to me, the phrase "transition team" really hints at a trap of sorts.
As I understand it, a trap is not designed only for defense. The idea of the trap is really to force the opposition into a bad spot and have them make a mistake. The typical 1-2-2 that I've seen has a forechecker force the opposition to make a move, two forwards stay in the neutral zone to isolate the area where the puck is, and the defending players (be it the forwards or defense) acts accordingly to make an appropriate play. For example, forcing a turnover, forcing a bad pass, or force a dump-in by the opposition, and so forth.
But that's only half of the job. The trap is only a complete success when the defending team switches their mindset and their movement towards offense the moment they get the puck after making a defensive play. The idea is that while the opposition is recovering from the error, the defense transitions into offense for a quick, heads-up play. Much of the offense generated from a 1-2-2 or another trapping scheme comes from counter-attacks up ice. This necessitates not only a team that is defensively sound, committed to the system, and willing to be patient enough to wait for an eventual miscue by the opposition. The team must be fast and aware of any opportunity to make the opposition pay for their errors. In short, the team has to be focus mainly on a transition offense - which is what Lemaire stated in the interview.
Now, the Devils may or may not have the players to make such a system work. And it's entirely possible the Devils would be even more successful in such of a system. I'm willing to concede that; and I still don't have some special dislike of a trap. I am also willing to be quite wrong in how I'm interpreting Lemaire's words or in thinking Lemaire has committed to a certain style prior to training camp. But this has me (and I'm sure some other Devils fans as well) still worried about his intentions and by extension the fact he's the head coach. Again, I really felt the Devils played very well last year under Sutter's style and given that the core of the team is still the same, I don't feel that changing that system makes any sense.
Have your say in the comments below. Do you agree with me that his response on the official website Q&A suggests that the 2009-10 Devils will incorporate a trap of sorts? Do you think there's really nothing to be concerned over? Would you even prefer that the Devils play as a "transition team," as Lemaire would like? Does this change your opinion about Lemaire being the head coach for the Devils at all? Let me know what you think this weekend in the comments.
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I would think he(Lemaire)would incorporate at least to some degree the trap system as that is his specialty and ticket to coaching success.I don’t know if coaches have multiple coaching systems that change according to the team they coach at that time,but at any case it will be interesting to see what happens because there are so many variables.The two things I’m happy to hear from him is focusing on speed and transition because although they were not a slow team with a slow trans game I always felt they didn’t have enough speed/quickness in their transition game to compete at a Stanley cup level.
What will be interesting is where he will find the speed. The core of the team hasn’t changed, really, so it’s not as if the forwards or defensemen will suddenly become faster this season. I do agree with you that the Devils really didn’t have the speed to focus on a transition game; they were built for possession and winning battles along the boards for puck – where it’s OK to be second to the puck as long as you can work to win it back.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Aug 16, 2009 9:24 PM EDT up reply actions
I hope Lemaire is referring to something like what Pittsburgh did this season in order to win the Cup, because if that’s the case then I am all for it. Pittsburgh won with solid defense, forcing mistakes, and countering on offense. Granted, we don’t have a Crosby or a Malkin but the system itself could work if our finishers can finish on a regular basis.
I’m not sure Pittsburgh’s defense was all that solid throughout the playoffs. The defense definitely stepped up in their knockout games (Game 7 against Washington, Games 6 & 7 against Detroit comes to mind), but I personally wasn’t impressed with how they performed in general.
But I do agree that any postseason success will require what Pittsburgh did – which is to raise their game enough to keep the series close and rise above when pressed up against a proverbial wall.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Aug 16, 2009 9:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Transition team
definitely implies a trap. The whole goal of transition is that you’re creating offense from mistakes from the other team and in order to get those mistakes from other teams, you definitely need a trap of some sorts. Now there are different versions of the trap, but it might work well with the Devils speed up front and puck moving abilities of Oduya and Martin. I just hope that he allows the defense to move forward in that transition.
Still I’m not crazy about watching the trap for 82 games, even if it’s a modified version of it. At the same time, I don’t care if the team runs the Flying V…as long as they win their fourth Cup.
by Tyler Bleszinski on Aug 15, 2009 3:54 PM EDT reply actions
What if he just means transitioning between coaches?
That’s still a transition team. They are transitioning from one coach to another.
by Nothinggoespast on Aug 16, 2009 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Too literal
Interesting, but I think Lemaire was referring to how he wants the team to play. A transition offense thrives with a team based on speed, which is what Lemaire called out in his response.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Aug 16, 2009 9:20 PM EDT up reply actions
I definitely agree that if Lemaire’s tactics will lead to success, then I certainly won’t be complaining then!
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Aug 16, 2009 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions
that Q AND A really made me certain this will work.
has any one else ever noticed how good lemarie teams special teams are.i can rember seeing very nice power play goals when he was here and especially in min.i really think he will restore the devils power play to top 5 in the league.the increase in pp goals will also make up for alot of the lost 5 on 5 scoring.
try not to worry too much about lemarie he is the closest thing too yoda in the nhl there really is no one who knows more about how to win games.
by Imperator_Celtic on Aug 15, 2009 7:25 PM EDT reply actions
Trap can't survive today
The trap system we used in 95 would not work today, The NHL has put in rules against it, and the devils of 95 are the reason there are so many obstruction holding penalties in the NHL today.
The trap we use to have also requires elite play from the defense, and we just don’t have those tools today, so you just won’t see it.
We get beat up pretty good for the trap, but you hear less abut the wings who used a left wing lock for several stanley cups. If the crease puck handling rules were not changed we would have went much further the last few years. MARTY IS THAT GOOD!
What will we be seeing? DEFENSIVE RESPONSIBILITY. Jacques lives by it, and frankly you win championships by plating that way.That doesn’t mean trap, it means take care of your defensive responsibilities first.
We will absolutely be a turn over transition team. Hockey has always been about mismatches and turn overs, and thats what you will see with our new coach. Minimize your mistakes and maximize your opportunities.
You all realize that Detroit plays basically plays amodified Trap/transition game Lemaire is talking about correct?
The trap never dissappeared after the lock-out. It was simply modified by those teams and coaches good enough to adapt it to the post-lockout game
Maybe so, but does Lemaire plan to implement something like that or a more traditional trap?
Pepe: I understand that hockey – and all sports – thrives on making opponents making mistakes. I just don’t know if that should be the sole focus for the Devils, especially after a season where the Devils thrived under taking initiative and played a little more aggressively on offense.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Aug 16, 2009 9:37 PM EDT up reply actions
I was worried in June but I think we're over-reacting
I agree with pep22 — I don’t think the old ’93 Lemaire-trapping system would work today. It was fine with the hooking, grabbing, and interference that went on back then. But you have to admit that most teams today start to trap once they take a lead in a game, but they have to do it intelligently and with the skates to transition the play quickly.
Remember that Lemaire did not trap to the point of restricting offense. The Devils goal scoring for the 92-93 season was 308, and for 93-94 was 306. The big difference was the goals against went from 299 to 220. Trapping isn’t boring if the team can still score.
Let’s give the man a chance, he’s not stupid. After the agonizing Carolina defeat last year that was an obvious defensive mistake, anything he can do to improve that would hopefully let the Devs get past the first round of playoffs.
Let’s look at Lemaire’s whole tenure with respect to how the offense did under him (Aside: Herb Brooks was the coach in 1992-93)
93-94: 306 goals in 84 games (3.64 average)
94-95: 136 goals in 48 games (2.83 average)
95-96: 215 goals in 82 games (2.62 average)
96-97: 231 goals in 82 games (2.81 average)
97-98: 225 goals in 82 games (2.74 average)
I mean, those aren’t terrible numbers and the Devils were quite successful in the regular season under him (save for 95-96). And I will concede that many other factors – better goalies, other teams playing the trap, not as many offensive players on the roster – will contribute to lower goal totals. Yet, the average goals scored per game dropped by .81 – 1.02 goals from that 93-94 season. Did so much change in so little time? Surely, Lemaire would have to be questioned about that – even though it is ultimately a minor one since the Devils did win a Cup in 94-95 and 3 Atlantic Division titles since 93-94 under Lemaire.
I’m willing to give him a chance, but I personally am worried at how well a trap would work in NJ after so many seasons where the Devils didn’t play one.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Aug 16, 2009 9:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Minnesota was one of the few teams that allowed fewer goals than the Devils last year, but their lack of success wasn’t due to a lack of offense in a philosophical sense, but rather a personnel sense.
Lemaire now has better offensive players to match with his defensive responsibility, so I don’t see a problem.
Lemaire knows how to win.
Come on guys remember the cup we got with Lemaire coaching. I realize it was a different time period and the league has changed but it is not as if Lemaire has not coached in the new NHL. I am sure he has adapted to the different style of play coaching in the western conference with the Detroits and Anaheims. I think he did a awesome job with Minnesota considering the personnel he had over there. With a pretty good Devil team and Brodeur in goal, he will finish off the job that Sutter could not do. Lets not forget his success as a Devil coach before and what he can do for us now..
Donald Vasquez
I think it should help get some of our young guys on the ice faster. Most of our recent draft picks are fairly defensive minded guys. Not to mention that if we’re not playing that puck possession game, Zubes has virtually no place on the top two lines. I can see where you’re worried about this John, but I think this has potential to bring out this team’s potential as well.
For the record
I wasn’t endorsing what Jacques will do, and would be very happy if he tweaked what we had last year. I just think he has a different theory on how the game is played and will be making some fundamental changes in how we play. I hope I’m wrong, because I liked the team we had last year and think if we got a little more scoring from the Defense we would have went a long way.

by 



















