Good News: Jacques Lemaire Tips His Plans for the New Jersey Devils prior to Training Camp to Gulitti
Rookies will report to the New Jersey Devils training camp tomorrow; but today was the team's annual golf outing for current Devils and Devils alumni. As a result, there was quotes to be had, and Tom Gulitti got more information from the head coach, Jacques Lemaire, about what he plans to do in training camp.
He's hinted at his plans earlier in August, stating that he'd like the Devils to be a "transition team," something I've had plenty to say about. I've said in the past that I was concerned about how Lemaire will manage the Devils, given that I really liked what Brent Sutter was doing with the team. I still am to a point.
However, this quote Gulitti got from Lemaire is quite revealing - and reassuring:
**On being excited to be back with the Devils and the start of training camp: "We were talking about this on our way here, Mario [Tremblay] and I. It's a good, a change. It gives you energy. You need a change. It's like players at a certain time. It's fun. We've got a good start. All of our planning at the start and how we want the game to be played, it's good. Scotty's [Stevens?] there. He tells me what the team was doing good, like the power-play breakout as an example. We don't want to change that because it was good last year. So, we'll keep the same thing. The penalty kill, he says we could be a little better, so we're going to work on that, try to find maybe another system you want to put in. It will be a little different, but maybe we'll get more success out of it. Little things like that. Defensemen around the net. I know myself I noticed that some defensemen could be better there, so we'll work on that. Little stuff like that.
"Let's face it, this team had a great season last year so they must have done something good. So I want to keep this, I don't want to change what was done and they had success with."
Emphasis mine, and I want to emphasize it with some relief. Despite the postseason, the Devils were quite successful last season playing under Brent Sutter's way with a record of 51-27-4. The most obvious area of growth was on offense, where the Devils scored a total of 238 goals, tied with Anaheim for 14th most in the league. OK, it's not a very large number; but it's an improvement over finishing in the bottom third in the league in goals scored. The more aggressive style of hockey really suited the team in motion and on the scoreboard.
That Lemaire recognizes this success is important. It suggests that he doesn't want to change the system entirely, but improve it in certain areas.
On top of this, he calls out some important areas of improvement for the Devils as needing work. I am fully on board with this on the penalty kill. For a team that has had a reputation of being responsible in their own end for over 15 years now, the Devils were not good on the penalty kill last season. New Jersey finished with a success rate of 79.9%, tied with Colorado for 20th in the league. Not something you'd expect with a team that had many returning defensemen, forwards who know how to backcheck, and the dynamic duo of Jay Pandolfo and John Madden. Then again, who'd expect that duo to do so poor as well? Anyway, Lemaire is correct in stating that this function of the team needs to get better.
The latter part about how the defensemen need to perform better, especially around the crease, could be seen as a general "defense needs to improve" comment or one more geared to infamous Game 7 collapse back in April. I'm not sure. Given that Lemaire will have the top 6 of 2008-09 returning on defense, it'll be interesting to see how he'll work with them to improve there. Especially for players like Bryce Salvador and Colin White, who can't rely on their speed on defense, much less in those high-traffic areas.
I do wish he called out how the team did on faceoffs. Yes, they did fairly well last season, with the top 4 faceoff men winning at least 51% of their faceoffs. Yet, John Madden (51.6%) is gone, Bobby Holik (59.3%) is retired, and who knows where Dainius Zubrus (51.2%) will end up on the roster. In the article where this quote came from, Lemaire is talking up Patrik Elias as a center and may use him as a center in training camp. In the comments, Gulitti did state that Elias liked playing the position and he felt Elias did well outside of faceoffs.
It's because of the faceoffs that I don't want to see Elias at center. I've said it before and I still stand by it. It's pretty telling that after a long stint at center in 2007-08, Brent Sutter kept him for the most part at left wing the very next season. I really don't know that a third experiment will yield better results. But it is better to try it out in training camp and preseason instead of the regular season.
If you need a more statistical reason why faceoffs are so important, then you need to read this article by Gabriel Desjardins at Puck Prospectus about how shooting rates change when the defending team wins or loses a defensive zone faceoff. In summary, losing a faceoff in the defensive zone (or winning it in the offensive zone) yields a much higher rate of shots per second within seconds of the faceoff. That possession won by the offense often leads to a shot or shots. The rate of shots are so high, Desjardins compares it to a 5-on-3 power play for 10-15 seconds.
I feel this is a big reason why faceoffs are important at all. Unless Elias somehow and someway gets really good at faceoffs and Rod Pelley shows he's solid at faceoffs, this is an issue that should also be addressed in camp. Hopefully, it will get the proper attention.
Overall, this quote makes me feel much better with the prospect of Lemaire behind the bench, and I'm looking forward to preseason to see how well Lemaire and the coaching staff has done with the Devils. I'm hoping he follows his words and we see a tweaked system instead of a brand new one.
0 recs |
4 comments
|
Comments
i member alot of late goals the last few years.for some reason i think there gonna be excatly the same except mabey fixing that.
by Imperator_Celtic on Sep 8, 2009 9:14 PM EDT reply actions
I usually hate seeing people do line permutations… but if elias does line up at center in training camp with Rolston moved back to his prefered LW… do you see Bergfors or Clarkson sliding into RW?
While Elias may be a huge question mark becaus eof face-offs this move does move Zubrus down to a checking center (i assume?), something that I think he’d excel at.
Incidentally, some feel that could be the big fight in training camp. Does Bergfors finally break through and be a player that resembles why the Devils drafted him, or does Clarkson step it up? Of course, Zubrus could just slide to wing and fill that spot too.
I’m not so sure about Zubrus’ defense; but maybe he’d be suited for it? There’s a lot of “wait and see” unfortunately.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Sep 8, 2009 11:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Zubrus
I think Zubrus has grown into a pretty solid two-way player in the two years he’s spent in NJ. I think once the defensive responsibility is beaten into you it’s hard to just forget. 2 years here and I think Zubrus not only has made great strides, he can still get better. He’s what 30, 31? I think checking centers or players more suited for either gritty and/or defensive play don’t reallyhit their primes until that age, much like defense men. Plus he’s big, willing to get his hands dirty and could be very punishing physical player were he to really use his size.
I don’t think Zubrus is ever going to be a 60-70 pt player… he only ever was one because he was fortunate enough to play with Ovechkin. I’d love to see a statistical breakdown of how many ghost assist Zubrus was awarded while skating with Ovechkin and how it inflated his point totals if that’s even possible.
Despite not living up to some fans scoring expectations, i personally don’t think Zubrus is a bust but in many ways a classic mold NJ 3rd liner. I’m sure Zubrusis aware to the whole “Zubust” tag he’s gotten for his large contract with only 78 pts to show for it over two seasons and I’m sure it’s had an effect on his confidence. I think being freed of the reigns from fans expecting him to score like a 2nd line center will make Zubrus not only a better player but possibly a great checking center who could still be chipping in 15 goals and 25 assists a season.
No knock on Pelley, because well none of us have seen much from him yet but I think if Lemiare is going to see this whoel Elias at center thing, I have a lot more confidence with Zubrus as our checking center and Pelley earning his stripes on the 4th line with maybe some PK duty.
I’m also really curious who ends up winning the 3rd line LW job… Shanny or Pando?

by 


















