Too Little, Too Late: New Jersey Devils Can't Make Up Deficit to Tampa Bay Lightning, Lose 4-2
Tonight, the New Jersey Devils-Tampa Bay Lightning game was finally resolved at the Rock. The lights worked fine and the game did start with 9:12 left in the second period with a faceoff just outside the blueline. Just as where the game left off on Friday. There were a few changes: Yann Danis came in relief of Martin Brodeur, and Tampa Bay dressed Andrej Meszaros and David Hale for Mattias Ohlund (ill) and Matt Smaby (injury). A few thousand came out to the Rock to see the team play and they were very vocal all night long.
What they got to see was a Devils team playing with the right amount of energy and very aggressive hockey for the remaining 29:12. Unfortunately, they couldn't make up the difference against the Lightning. The Devils couldn't get anything past Mike Smith (who did well among the deluge of rubber he saw) in the second period and spent at least a third of the second period on the penalty kill. While the Devils struck first thanks to Travis Zajac in the slot, Steven Stamkos was found all alone in the slot a few minutes later. Of course, he scored - the shot was a one timer from a nice feed from Martin St. Louis. Stamkos burned up ice as St. Louis beat Andy Greene to a cleared puck, got the pass off perfectly, and the then-hot crowd became a lot more quiet. Danis had no chance, really. Stamkos is too good of a player to be left open and ultimately that goal pretty much sealed it.
Sure, Zach Parise got a nice goal right in front near the end, but it was ultimately a second consolation goal. The defensive mistakes that cost the team dearly on Friday were too much to overcome. After 62+ minutes in Montreal, I can't fault the team's hustle or aggressive nature. At points, I felt they were too aggressive, leading to some sloppy passes and questionable decisions to shoot. Maybe they were Nevertheless, the Lightning had the advantage of the lead and once they got the insurance goal from Stamkos, they played smart, calmer hockey and only had to survive. They did just that, full credit to them. They had better quality shots, more big scoring chances with their 14 instead of New Jersey's 35. Once again, quality shots beats quantity in shots and that was proven tonight.
I got to say, the few thousand fans that showed up really brought their "A" game in terms of atmosphere. The "Let's Go Devils" chants were massive, especially after Zajac's goal. The ushers told the fans in the upper sections after the second period that they could come down to the lower bowl (nice gesture) and they brought the noise down below. I loved it. They gave out great ovations for Danis, when the PK got a clearance, when the announcer thanked the fans for coming out as well as their patience on Friday (smart by the Devils), and, of course, the goals. They also booed the refs harder than they did at the delay on Friday; thanks to what they perceived were some iffy penalties called in the second period: a goaltender interference call on Brian Rolston and a somewhat questionable Jay Pandolfo delay of game minor (I thought he was past the blueline, had it go into the benches, would it not just be a faceoff? Whatever.).
In any case, the fans were great, Devils management were smart with how they handled tonight, and the team gave an energetic effort despite an intense game last night. The ZZ Pops impressed the most: Jamie Langenbrunner ended the night with 2 assists and 9 shots; Parise had a goal with 5 shots; and Zajac had a goal and an assist with 4 shots. Where the Devils were flying, these three stuck out the most. But the Devils couldn't make up for where they faltered on Friday, and the fans were mostly resigned to that reality. Check out Raw Charge later on for a Lightning perspective on their win. Here's the link to NHL.com's recap of the game, with a link to all the stats to the whole game. For what happened on Friday's part of the game, they are in the addendum to Steve's post from Friday. After the jump is just an embedded video of all the highlights from the game from NHL.com. Thanks for reading and please leave all your thoughts about tonight's game in the comments.
0 recs |
15 comments
|
Comments
More reffing stuff that I’m including here as a supplement:
-I’m wonder if Mike Smith played the puck outside of the trapezoid at least once? Granted, I didn’t have a great view, but he was awfully far from behind the net a few times. Maybe he was right on the line.
-The fans were irate after a whistle by the refs cancelled out a rebound goal by Parise. Sucks, but that’s the right call – the whistle kills it dead.
-Did I mention the two penalties on the Devils called? I didn’t get a good look at Rolston’s, but I was pretty sure that Pandolfo was outside of the blueline. It was a deflection, unintentional move, and had it been on the other side into the benches, there would be no call. Not that it affected the final result, but it sucks all the same.
-Devils PP didn’t score, but they scored not long after the PP ended. At least it provided momentum?
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
about Pando's penalty
I’m glad you brought up the Pando delay of game penalty. I’m not sure of the specifics of the rule, but it looked like Pando hit the puck with a high stick and then the puck flew out of bounds. Wouldn’t that cancel out the penalty since the play would be dead due to a high stick? I’m guessing the Devils would have argued with the refs more if that were the case so I’m probably wrong but figured to ask while the game is still fresh in everyone’s mind.
by Devil_Hard_Core on Jan 10, 2010 10:40 PM EST up reply actions
Smith was very close to going in the corners a few times, but one time he clearly played the puck while in that zone. It did happen right before the Malone penalty, which I didn’t see; so maybe a make up call?
by Matthew Ventolo on Jan 10, 2010 10:43 PM EST up reply actions
They played well enough to win in both halves of the game, and by all stats should have, but every team has one of those games every now and then where all the bounces go the other team’s way.
The fourth goal was the killer. I know St. Louis is fast, but he made Greene look like a lumbering ogre skating back to get the puck, and lo and behold, somehow Stamkos is wide open in the slot again. Mental note for next year: cover that guy.
After they went back up by 3, you could see it took most of the wind out of the sails of the Devils (who had to be tired after the game in Montreal), and the Lightning did the smart thing and just went into a “defensive scheme” and didn’t even try to push.
It was unfortunate that they got down so big so quickly, and a win would have been nice, but the best thing to do is to take out any frustration on the next opponent ;)
Interesting side note: Some Lightning fans pshawed the Devils chances tonight, superciliously asking how often the Devils have scored 3+ goals in 30 minutes under defensively minded Lemaire this season. With a little research, it appears that that number is 15.
That last goal was due to Oduya's misstep causing the breakaway.
Fans (including me) were letting him have it, and rightfully so. You have to move back to cover, you can’t just lunge at the puck.
The puck was a good foot in front of the goaltender on the rebound when the ref blew the whistle. It was the quickest whistle I’ve seen this year, and it costs us a probable goal from the advantage in numbers we had at the time.
The Rolston penalty was complete BS, and I still don’t have a voice from yelling at the Refs.
It's hard to convince people to let you eat them if you're an asshole. - Thingray
One more thing.
Good on Central Parking for making the close lots free for the game. Classy move. Now maybe don’t charge 25$/game from now on and I’ll think about parking there more often.
It's hard to convince people to let you eat them if you're an asshole. - Thingray
As I watched this game from the comfort of my living room, two emotions came to mind. I was frustrated because the Devils clearly outplayed Tampa Bay throughout both halves of this game (Friday and Sunday). NJ outshot TB 33-10 when all was said and done. The Devils completely outplayed Tampa Bay. But there were two moments that completely killed the Devils chances:
1) Two awful penalties late in the second period against Brian Rolston and Pandolfo. Absolutely awful. We spent four out of the 9 minutes left on a penalty kill. Any momentum that could have been created was quickly extinguished.
2) Based on what Faux just commented one or two messages above this one, I guess it was Johnny Oduya who left Andy Greene high and dry against Tampa Bay’s 2 on 1, which led to a goal by Stamkos in the middle of the third period that sealed the deal. Shame on Johnny. Greene was outhustled to the puck near the boards for a lone Stamkos to capitalize, but it was the fault of the other defender, not Greene, for being completely out of position. If it was in fact Johnny, this just adds insult to injury upon a dreadful season.
When all is said and done, I can’t really get too angry with this team. At least they played their hearts out. That being said, however, I would completely forgive them if they come out strong and bounce back against the Rangers tomorrow night.
LETS GO DEVILS
"We aim above the mark to hit the mark." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Oduya
I have to say in the beginning of the season I was happy that the Devils re-signed Johnny, but his play this year is disappointing and it’s almost like the development we expected from him this year is yet to happen. Hope he can still turn it around this year, but if not….
Oduya + Halischuk + Zubrus = Scotty Nieds
Let’s not wait until the deadline so Scotty has time to build chemistry with the team and get hot going into the playoffs.
…and if not that, then in Lou I will trust. Hall of Fame builder must be doing something right.
by Devil_Hard_Core on Jan 11, 2010 10:33 AM EST up reply actions
I'd rather have Zubrus (shudder).
We already have a good defense, provided Paul comes back and we get scratch Oduya most nights. Martin/Greene, Salvador/Fraser, Motteau/White is a set I’d take against any other team, including those in the Western Conference. I mean what’s the real-world improvement of Motteau/White to Neids when almost every forward on our team plays good defense?
That and I don’t think you can pawn Oduya off on anyone right now.
It's hard to convince people to let you eat them if you're an asshole. - Thingray
odyua development i to was happy to see him sighn but now
id say he has gone backward from last year,i wonder if he heard he is on the trade block and it is distracting him.
by Imperator_Celtic on Jan 11, 2010 1:57 PM EST up reply actions
I was never really happy with the Oduya signing.
I felt we could have gotten a lower-end free agent/small trade that played our style for less money and made him better ala Salvador.
It's hard to convince people to let you eat them if you're an asshole. - Thingray
he looked ok with sutter as coach prehaps they would be interested in him calgary.
by Imperator_Celtic on Jan 11, 2010 2:03 PM EST up reply actions
As of today, Anaheim is 20-19-7 with 47 points, which is 6 points out of the 8th seed in the Western Conference. They are currently in 12th place in the conference and 5th place in the Pacific Division. Throughout the last ten games, they have a record of 5-5-0. If Anaheim were interested in rebuilding, they would trade Scotty in exchange for 1)cap relief 2) a young talent. That being said, I don’t think that Oduya fits that role. He is getting paid good money and he’s 28 years old. Anaheim would want expiring contract(s), a young talented defenseman to potentially replace Scottys presence, and probably a draft pick or two.
I think Lou is more than interested in Scotty. He met with him before the year began and eventually signed his brother. But Lou would not make a move unless it brought us into cup contention. Anaheim would have to accept a deal too good to refuse.
"We aim above the mark to hit the mark." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
by Tim G on Jan 11, 2010 12:16 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
I’m pretty impressed that Oduya pinching up on one play leading to Stamkos being uncovered for the goal leads to talk about trading him. Yeah, he’s not doing as well as he did last season; but are we seriously thinking about moving players every time they make a mistake – and for Scott Niedermayer, no less?
Besides, Andy Greene should have either committed to Stamkos, which is usually what a defenseman does in a 2-on-1, or skated like hell to beat St. Louis to that loose puck since that’s what he ended up committing on anyway. Both Oduya and Greene were at fault for different reasons.
Moreover, the goal really just took the wind out of the team’s sails as elesias noted. The Devils never made up 3 goals so it’s not like it was the game winner, the defensive breakdowns not made by Oduya-Greene on Friday ultimately doomed them.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog

by 



















