Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Two Minutes Of Thunder Basketball Wins The Game

Four Reasons Why the New Jersey Devils Solely Relying on LTIR for Cap Relief Isn't Smart

So, Rod Pelley, how is it going to feel being without a consistent winger on one side for this month? (Photo by Andrew Burton/Getty Images)

Yesterday, the New Jersey Devils demoted Mattias Tedenby, Jacob Josefson, Matthew Corrente, and Rob Davison to bring their active roster down to 22 signed players.   In response to the news, I gave my reasoning that the team would have to make more moves to create cap space.  Bryce Salvador and Anssi Salmela can be placed on long term injured reserve (LTIR) to get the Devils just under the salary cap upper limit, but they cannot sign anyone else - not even Adam Mair, who is still practicing with the team.  Surely, I did not expect the Devils to begin the 2010-11 season with 11 forwards, 7 defensemen (Alexander Urbom and Matt Taormina survived all of the cuts), and 2 goaltenders with less than $100k in cap space.

Well, I may be proven wrong in short order. The Devils are apparently fine with just putting Salvador and Salmela on LTIR and running with just 20 on the active roster, according to this report from Tom Gulitti today.  This later post from Gulitti has quotes from some of the players expressing relief that no one has been shipped out.  Actions speak louder than words, and the inaction by New Jersey is the basis for this logic.  The Devils didn't place anyone on waivers today (Dainius Zubrus definitely didn't - and won't); and there are no indications of any loans or trades.  Though, one can never really predict a trade from Lou Lamoriello, it's just as unlikely he'll pull one off in less than 24 hours.  But again, the Devils would be under the cap and they may be content with that to start the season.

It's necessary to put Salvador and Salmela on LTIR at this point.  I fully understand this plan, while not a good one, does accomplish the critical goal of being cap compliant tomorrow afternoon.    I also understand that it's possible that perhaps there was no favorable deal available, ownership wouldn't support burying millions in salary in Albany, and loans are out of the question.  I accept that possibility.  Rationalizations aside, I still don't think it is a smart decision for the Devils to just move players to LTIR for four reasons. 

Star-divide

The first is the obvious. All this does is buy New Jersey time. A player on LTIR has to remain there for at least 10 games and 24 days minimum.  By putting Salvador and Salmela on LTIR tomorrow, they'll be out  for the entire month at a minimum.  24 days from October 6 would make it October 30, and the Devils don't play on that day or the final day of the month.   If the player isn't healthy after then, then he can remain on LTIR - but can be activated when he's cleared to play.   Either Salvador or Salmela becoming active will force the Devils to make some serious moves, so the team's got the rest of the month to figure it out.   It would be in the team's best interest to make that move before they are ready to go off LTIR to sign or call up replacements.

The second is more intangible.  Here's Jamie Langenbrunner's quote regarding the apparent situation:

"It looks like this is what it’s going to be going forward for a while," Langenbrunner said. "Everyone will have to fend for their health, but for now the focus is on Friday. All of us in this business know that there’s never going to be relief any time, so I don’t think it’s that’s big of a deal for us. (But) we knew something was going to happen or we thought something would, so there’s a little bit of relief."

Any stress resulting from worrying about their future as a Devil is going to impact a player's performance.  Players are people too, and this can be a distraction. Langenbrunner doesn't refer to this as a "little bit of relief" if it wasn't.  It's one thing for this stress to take place in training camp and preseason; it's another when it's during the season where the games count.  Remember, it's not an easy month of competition; and I don't want certain Devils players not fully focused on the next game because they could be trade/waiver/loan targets again by the end of the month.  It can certainly affect their on-ice performance. The relief from this concern, like the Devils' cap relief, is temporary.

The third reason are minor injuries, believe it or not.  Like most sports, injuries are a part of the game and they can't be controlled.  The Devils have the bare minimum of 20 players on their active roster.  The Devils would have a difficult choice to make if a player just needs a night off to rest up or is day-to-day with an ailment whilst Salvador and Salmela are on LTIR.   They could play with a shortened roster, which makes the game more difficult for the rest of the squad. They can hope the player can play through the injury, risking further injury as well as poorer performance.  Or they can take that player out for 10 games and 24 days by putting them on LTIR to get the space for a replacement - not ideal if the player is crucial to the team's success.   Generally with injuries, a team can only worry about that when it happens; but the Devils don't have a lot of options due to their own cap issues.

The fourth, final, and most important reason is the make up of the team itself.  Yes, keeping Alexander Urbom and Matt Taormina allows the Devils to have more offensive defenders in the lineup.  That's all well and good, but the team only has 11 forwards.   Presumably, Rod Pelley and Pierre-Luc Letourneau-Leblond are short a linemate.  Whereas most teams would shorten their bench in the third period, the Devils are doing it right from the opening faceoff.   The Devils do have forwards who can take extra minutes, but they'll be double-shifting guys all night long - for the first 10 games. This can overwork players early in the season and create match-up problems. Plus, if a forward or a line is getting beaten on, then MacLean is more limited into what he changes he can make about it.

A fourth line may not be called on to do much, but the 10-12 minutes they spell the other three lines does matter.  Especially if they can outplay the opposition's bottom line.  But that's undercut by the fact that the Devils don't even have a full fourth line right now.

Granted, the Devils can address this easily by going to 6 defensemen.  They can send Alexander Urbom down to Albany, call up Vladimir Zharkov (among other options cheaper than $870k), and have a fourth line of Leblond-Pelley-Zharkov.  The Devils would save $20,000; have 12 forwards; and  fourth line that even played with each other last season.  They can also do this by replacing Matt Taormina with Tim Sestito, Patrick Davis, or Chad Wiseman (all min. salary players).   However, I don't think the Devils will do either in the next few days. According to Gulitti, Urbom and Taormina have been told they're in NJ for the time being. 

Of course, if the Devils make a permanent move for cap space before 3 PM tomorrow, then these reasons are entirely moot.  Until then, they'll remain as reasons for concern until such a transaction is made.   What that transaction will be, that's up to Lou and the rest of the Devils management.

What do you think of the Devils' apparent plan?  Are you concerned about this as I am? Are you satisified with the Devils going a month with 11 forwards and 7 defensemen.  Perhaps you feel differently.  Please let me know what you think in the comments.   Thanks for reading.

Comment 43 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

This could just be a move to buy Lou some time. He could still make another move before fridays game.

by C.J. Richey on Oct 5, 2010 9:08 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

I think an important aspect to retain is that having Salvador and Salmela on LTIR buys specific time: barganing time. This event gives Lamoriello a tool do achieve a succesful deal. Instead of having to deal a player by a specific time, we can chose what deal suites us. Competition for an offered player will then increase and we will most likely get more bang for our buck

Its sad to say and sounds awful, but with this turn of events, I think we will be better of

by Los Diablos on Oct 5, 2010 9:09 PM EDT reply actions  

It's a tough place to put Johnny Mac in . .

 . . . that’s for sure. I say keep a spare players’ equipment in Hedberg’s locker, in case Johan needs to skate out.

But seriously, looking at this:

Granted, the Devils can address this easily by going to 6 defensemen. They can send Alexander Urbom down to Albany, call up Vladimir Zharkov (among other options cheaper than $870k), and have a fourth line of Leblond-Pelley-Zharkov. The Devils would save $20,000; have 12 forwards; and fourth line that even played with each other last season. They can also do this by replacing Matt Taormina with Tim Sestito, Patrick Davis, or Chad Wiseman (all min. salary players).

That’s what I’ve been thinking from the start. Why not Zharkov?

Well, Kovy saw more PP time anyway, and John, I’d like to know what each Devils’ ice time average was post Olympic break.

Maybe, since they’re paying him so much, then he will play more (hopefully only with Volchenkov – because he terrible defense will need to be compensated for).

But I don’t like this whole situation. I know Lou is probably out of options and I would not put it past him to have a trick up his sleeve, but the players, the recent quotes, it just does not sound to me like a team whose focus is on hockey, but on other issues.

As someone who has coached at the HS level, I truly feel bad for John MacLean, Robinson and Oates. They don’t deserve this situation. Either do the leaders of this team, wondering if a cheap shot will make a difference between an even shorter bench. Does this make Clarkson, Pelley or LeBlond less willing to drop the gloves? How does Johnny Mac handle a cheap shot in a building like Philly or MSG?

The Devils need to win Game 1 and get rolling to get momentum and hopefully it’ll be resolved by then. However, all in all I have a feeling this is going to be a very difficult October for us.

Unless Lou does something . . .

I have respect for most sports fans with 2 exceptions: NY Ranger fans who grew up in New Jersey, and Dallas Cowboy fans who can't name the capital of Texas.

by Cherno77 on Oct 5, 2010 9:15 PM EDT reply actions  

Exactly. We just sit back and watch.

by Goblechuk on Oct 5, 2010 10:13 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Out of curiousity

What are the penalties for exceeding the cap?

by TWilliAM on Oct 5, 2010 9:38 PM EDT reply actions  

forfeited games and fines.

Go Devils
Go Jets
Like sports betting? Sign up with centsports and do it for free

by FrankG929 on Oct 5, 2010 9:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with some of the above comments that, more than anything, Lou is buying himself time and trying to put himself in a better bargaining position. The easiest solution should something go wrong is to waive Zubrus and send him down – which can be accomplished in no more than 48 hrs. At the worst, he always has that card to play.

What Lou has done is managed to get under the cap without losing a single asset. He could have put a 1st rd pick into play, he could have waived Zubrus and sent him down, he could have used a Clarkson or a Langenbrunner (pending NTC) as a trading chip and gotten a bag of pucks in return for cap space, but he is giving himself time to patiently wait out the vultures circling overhead. Another team will suffer an injury to a key forward and will need help, and that will shift the balance of power in these negotiations.

What I find interesting is his unwillingness to waive Zubrus. Perhaps it’s a matter of loyalty, and it’s certainly not a matter of money (JVB can afford to bury Zubrus in the minors for 1-2 yrs), but perhaps it is a matter of perceived value to the club. Maybe Lou really believes in Zubrus’ value and just isn’t willing to send him off for zero return.

I believe he’s trying like hell to trade Rolston. Someone from the current roster has to go, in the long run.

Not going anywhere (too valuable or recently signed/acquired): Parise, Zajac, Kovalchuk, Arnott, Clarkson, Volchenkov, Tallinder, Brodeur, Hedberg
Useful long-time Devils: Elias, White, Langenbrunner
Not paid enough to be traded: Greene and any of the young guys

That leaves just Rolston, Zubrus, and Salvador. Either Rolston goes or Zubrus AND Salvador go. But if the plan is to get rid of Zubrus and Salvador, why not just waive Zubrus at this point and allow the team to move on? Because the plan is, and perhaps always has been, to get rid of Rolston some way, somehow.

by dr(d)evil on Oct 5, 2010 10:02 PM EDT reply actions  

Lou is unwilling to waive Zubrus because he IS an NHL caliber player, unlike Redden, and even some of his similar moves in the past, were no longer viable NHL options.

Go Devils
Go Jets
Like sports betting? Sign up with centsports and do it for free

by FrankG929 on Oct 6, 2010 12:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

ZUBRUS WAIVED

I was watching the NHL Network’s Western Conference Primer, and scrawling across the bottom of the screen said Report: Devils waive Dainius Zubrus. They repeated this several times but made no actual mention of Zubrus being moved. I trust it, even though no source was named, because it makes entirely too much sense. Did anyone else see this?
I would make a FanShot, but I do not see this in print anywhere.

"Don't worry about my Cap." - Lou Lamoriello

by Skuba7 on Oct 5, 2010 10:02 PM EDT reply actions  

If that’s true, it would be a shame. Sure, he didn’t play up to his salary (though he was better than Rolston), but he played hard every night at least.

Devils fan for 23 of the 29 years I've been alive. Devils fan until the day I die.

by Marty 4 Prez on Oct 5, 2010 10:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nope, not true

That’s why I included this in the first part of the post:

The Devils didn’t place anyone on waivers today (Dainius Zubrus definitely didn’t – and won’t); and there are no indications of any loans or trades.

Gulitti tweeted that Zubrus wasn’t put on waivers and won’t be.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Oct 5, 2010 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

The buyouts really hurt right now

The $1 M of cap space used to buy out Peters and Pando are really hurting us right now. That $1M would be the difference in being able to sign Mair and have a little more breathing room.

What sucks is that Lou probably bought those two out as a favor to them, to allow them to hit the free agent market instead of getting sent to the minors, yet neither of them ended up with a contract or even a tryout anywhere.

by dr(d)evil on Oct 5, 2010 10:04 PM EDT reply actions  

Peters got a tryout in Florida, although he was just waived again.

As much as I hated seeing him take up a roster spot in New Jersey, I REALLY would have hated to see him take up a roster spot in Albany and take ice time away from the young guns. Even at $500K.

As for Pando…I think the buyout was Lou’s way of giving him an honorable discharge, as it were. I wouldn’t be surprised if he comes on as a special assignment coach if he doesn’t have a contract anywhere a month or so into the season.

by richer44 on Oct 5, 2010 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

peters didn’t get a tryout. he got a two-way contract.

by Triumph44 on Oct 5, 2010 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually....

…. Andrew Peters just got traded

by acasser on Oct 6, 2010 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Andrew Peters continues to be involved in some mind-boggling transactions. I’m amazed that a team in the NHL was actually interested enough in him to trade anything for him.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Oct 6, 2010 6:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

saves money for vancouver and florida, that’s all that is.

by Triumph44 on Oct 6, 2010 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

The $1 million buy out hit was worth it because it cleared $2 million in space total. If you want to be unhappy at $1 million being wasted, look no further than Hedberg’s deal.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Oct 5, 2010 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hedberg better end up starting 15-20 games for the extra $1m over Danis to be worth it.

1995 - 2000 - 2003

by bergenline on Oct 5, 2010 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

It may be only an extra $50K – $500K is in bonuses, which as a backup goaltender for the Devils, will likely be very difficult to reach.

Go Devils
Go Jets
Like sports betting? Sign up with centsports and do it for free

by FrankG929 on Oct 6, 2010 12:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

the $50K should be 500 as well. this keyboard hates duplicate letters

Go Devils
Go Jets
Like sports betting? Sign up with centsports and do it for free

by FrankG929 on Oct 6, 2010 12:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

what are you using, an old-school typewriter?

The buyouts are way more harmful/less useful than the extra mil for a backup goalie. We not only lose $1M in cap space this year, but next year as well. Yeah, if Lou had been more patient, he could probably have had Hedberg at a better price given the firesale of free agent goalies this summer. But the buyouts were intended to give those players a chance at making another NHL roster, and neither of them will. Neither of them are playing in the NHL, neither of them are getting paid what they could have been paid had they stayed put and accepted an assignment to the minors, and the Devils end up with a cap penalty for two years. Everyone loses in this situation.

by dr(d)evil on Oct 6, 2010 9:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

pandolfo wanted to be bought out – he asked lou for it. peters got a shot to make another NHL roster, he just didn’t get his chance. players tend not to believe that they are finished in the league, and all of them seem to understand that demotion to the minor leagues on a one-way contract is a death sentence.

plus pandolfo’s contract would’ve put us awful close to that summer cap.

by Triumph44 on Oct 6, 2010 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

also remember, the total of their buyouts is a cap hit of 1 million. if they were still on the team it would have been 3 million, so lou saved 2 million doing it. idk if he had considered burying them in the minors or not.

by poopydoodie11 on Oct 5, 2010 10:29 PM EDT reply actions  

Both of those players asked to be bought out – they knew they were headed for the minors. It wouldn’t have been easy for Lou to bury Pando in the minors but there wasn’t nearly enough space to keep him around as a 4th liner, even before signing Kovalchuk.

by dr(d)evil on Oct 6, 2010 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

I still think something will be done so they can sign mair. I dont understand why they would still have him practicing with the team up to this point if they didnt want to keep him. Eventually one of the two playes on ltir will get better and something will need to be done anyways. I know ecklund isent really that reliable, but hes said various teams would be willing to take on salary (rolston or zubrus) if the devils would be willing to include langenbrunner. I think lou might consider this because he does have to resign zach and andy greene next summer so hell need another 5-6 million in space. And yes i know arnott and hedberg come of the books, but if he has a good season retaining jason is a definite possibility.

by poopydoodie11 on Oct 5, 2010 10:34 PM EDT reply actions  

11 forwards and 7 D is better than 12 forwards and 6 D if you are planning on going with a 20 man roster. Here’s some of the reasons:

#1: 4th line players tend to get between 5-10 minutes, 3rd pairing D tend to get between 10 and 15 minutes. Leblond got 5:30 last season and Pelley nearly 8. mark Fraser got 12:23.

#2: Going with 10 forwards is better than going with 5 D. If someone gets hurt at forward, it’s not that big a deal. If someone gets hurt at D with 6 D, that’s a bigger deal.

#3: You can always switch a defenseman to forward, but the reverse is not as a good idea.

#4: Players like Kovalchuk and Parise can handle 22 minutes a game. Kovalchuk can probably handle 25 minutes a game.

I’m fine with this for the time being, but I hope there’s a resolution soon-ish. With other teams banking cap room by the day, something may happen.

by Triumph44 on Oct 5, 2010 11:06 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

I agree with, well, most of this.

I still think a full fourth line that can contribute spot minutes is more advantageous to giving Parise, Kovalchuk (who may not have his minutes boosted by playing entire PPs this season), and others (Clarkson may get more minutes since he’s closer to following the identity of a Pelley-Leblond group than any other forward on the roster, but I’m just guessing) extra even strength minutes right out of the gate.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Oct 5, 2010 11:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with everything but #4. Yes, they can handle it for a long stretch of games, and of course this won’t be the plan for the entire season, but big minutes early in the season are going to take their toll later on and expose those players to higher risk of injury.

by dr(d)evil on Oct 6, 2010 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

the devils have been notoriously protective of their top players. it’s a top player league now, and a top player team. the days of these guys getting 18 minutes a game is over.

by Triumph44 on Oct 6, 2010 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't disagree that the Devils are buying time

But it has to be asked: What are the Devils buying time for? What’s going to be out there within the next month in terms of a trade or other transaction that isn’t available now? I suppose by the law averages, some team will want to make a change to their roster due to injury, poor performance by a player, etc. But beyond that, what’s going to be there?

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Oct 5, 2010 11:19 PM EDT reply actions  

you answered your own question. you’ve got 4 guys who are going to be playing their asses off to stay here.

by Triumph44 on Oct 5, 2010 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s on the NJ side. If the market wasn’t clamoring for these guys throughout September, what’s going to change that in October other than variable causes? That’s my concern.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Oct 5, 2010 11:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

variable causes always come up – that’s what you yourself said. and you can always waive zubrus if the roster is down to 17 and the devils need bodies. point is, lou will have more information after the beginning of the season about who wants to stay and who doesn’t.

by Triumph44 on Oct 5, 2010 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fair enough; perhaps I’m worrying if only because I honestly wanted a more permanent solution now. Not that it was ever up to me, but still, it would make this season a bit smoother. It’ll happen when it happens, I suppose.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Oct 5, 2010 11:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think there’s a number of potential rewards for patience here:

1. Waiting for an injury to occur on another team
2. Hoping guys like Zubrus and Rolston improve their trade stock by playing well (which they have, so far)
3. Waiting for another LTIR-worthy injury to hit the team

The Salvador injury is interesting. The timeline for returning from a concussion is vague, and post-concussive symptoms are also vague enough to be faked. We have no idea whether it will take a month or the whole season for Salvador to recover. But should he feel ready to return to action, he can probably be enticed into taking an extra month off – for his own health as well as the threat of being waived immediately and sent to the minors until a move is made.

And suppose the team is hit with another injury to a $2 M+ player requiring the LTIR – that allows the team to bring up not only a replacement player but extra forwards as well. Those players can be sent down when the player returns from injury. And this game could go on forever, because injuries are an inevitability. It could go on until the trade deadline, at which point teams will be willing to pay a bigger price for a player that can help them in a playoff run – enter Langenbrunner, who would have huge value at that point if he’s not injured. Even a guy like Rolston would be more palatable at that point – the other team would basically be picking him up for one year and a playoff run.

As you say, minor injuries pose a problem for the team. They can afford one injured defenseman and/or two injured forwards. Should there be more injuries and a trade can’t be worked out, then I think Zubrus will be waived.

by dr(d)evil on Oct 6, 2010 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

“Potential Reward #2” is a pipe dream. You aren’t trading either player or contract for much of anything at this point — the reward to the Devils is getting rid of the player and his contract, not in obtaining some wonderful return on the invenstment. I do agree that there is an upside to being patient, in that Lou isn’t technically obliged to make a move, and therefore isn’t going to get mugged in a deal quite yet.

I agree, Salvador is an interesting situation. After the whole Kovalchuk saga and the arguments about “cap circumvention”, I believe the League will sit on top of the Devils and force them to make a move as soon as Bryce shows signs that he’s close to healthy. If necessary, the League will bring in its own neurologists to do an examination, and err on the side of claiming he’s healthy. Admittedly, this brings up the risk that they pass said judgment, and Salvador has a relapse when he’s thrown back into the game — the PR backlash against the League from the media given the hue and cry about concussions will be massive. However, I suspect Bettman would take that chance where the Devils are concerned, either on his own or because certain unnamed GMs (I’m looking at the fat guy in Toronto) will poke and prod.

There’s certainly some time — the rest of October at a minimum under LTIR rules (10 games / 24 days) — but I don’t think Lou will have the flexibility we’d like him to have. Salmela isn’t a concern, here, because I imagine Lou will waive him to Albany (or let him get claimed) as soon as he’s healthy, unless Urbom and/or Taormina can’t cut it in NJ this season.

Should there be more injuries and a trade can’t be worked out, then I think Zubrus will be waived.

I think that’s Lou’s “In Emergency Break Glass” move, and he’s simply crossing his fingers that it won’t be necessary. His first option is to shuffle the rookies, even if just “on paper”, to manage the roster for a few days at a time. I expect Adam Mair will be asked to stick around without a contract, or that he’ll sign with Albany and promised that he’s the first guy on speed dial when something happens. When it comes down to it, however, I agree with your conclusion — Zubrus will be waived, it simply is a matter of how long Lou can put off that move hoping for something better to happen.

by acasser on Oct 6, 2010 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know I am old

But there was a time when teams did not dress 20, but 18, then 19 for games. Considering 19 was in the days when fighting was more acceptable, and teams had more guys sitting out for majors, they adapted.

I think the Devils make their moves about 7 games in, when some of the younger players getttng shots around the league fall on their face, and GMs, anxious to save the season, are more willing to take on salary.

Colorado struggles early, they will be begging for Rolston to help them out, especially if it all it costs is $$.

by Chip Arm on Oct 5, 2010 11:26 PM EDT reply actions  

Anybody except Zubrus

I want to trade or waive anybody, not Zubrus. That’s our way.

by SiberianDevil on Oct 6, 2010 12:48 AM EDT reply actions  

I'd rather see Salvador, Langenbrunner or Rolston

shipped out instead of Zubrus. Let’s not forget who the Devils best player in the playoffs was last year.

by Tyler Bleszinski on Oct 6, 2010 1:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Let’s not forget who the Devils best player in the playoffs was last year.

The answer to that one is “Ilya Kovalchuk”.

If you’re going to tell me Dainius Zubrus was our best player, allow me to remind you of the stat lines: Dainius Zubrus had one point the entire series (the Game 2 GWG) and has three points in three post-seasons (across 17 games) with NJ. Ilya Kovalchuk, on the other hand, had six points in the Philly series, including three points in Game 2 alone.

Don’t confuse Dainius actually giving an effort for all five games (when most of the roster quit by the end of Game 4) with being a good player. There’s a difference between energy/effort and talent/results. Besides which, if Zubrus is so desirable, why hasn’t Lou already received multiple good offers to unload him on another franchise? While I imagine some teams have put in queries about the big Lithuanian’s availability, I have no reason to believe the offers were anything substantial…. or we’d have likely heard about them somewhere by now. There hasn’t been a peep in the media at all, even from idiots like Eklund.

by acasser on Oct 6, 2010 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

because his contract runs for 3 more years. if his contract ended in 2 years, he’d probably already be gone.

by Triumph44 on Oct 6, 2010 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the New Jersey Devils! New here? Check out the Rules and Guidelines before posting.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

The_official_web_site___new_jersey_devils_small
FOR THE LOVE OF THE DEVILS...PLEASE DON'T SELL YOUR TICKETS TO RANGERS FANS
Stanley_cup_wallpaper_small
Devils vs. Flyers -- Two Opposing Worlds Separated by 90 Miles

Recent FanPosts

Claude_small
Post your press conference question(s) for John Tortorella here.
Pig_face_small
Mar-ty, Hen-ke
Small
Top Secret Agent or Cranky Middle Aged Man?
Small
Karma, and Pucks, and Chips Oh My,
Small
No Blue Campaign -- Tickets for Sale
Small
On Shot Blocking
Scott_stevens_2_small
Strategy Adjustments to Defeat the Rangers (IMO)
Small
Harrold vs. Larsson
Lisrobot_small
Game 1 Albany Meetup
Scottyyy_small
How to beat the Rags

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

joomla visitors

Managers

Stanley_cup_and_you_-_sbn_small John Fischer

Authors

Puddy_small Tom Stivali

Marty_sbetter_small Matthew Ventolo

Zidlickymania_small Kevin Sellathamby

1729_small Matt Evans SNC