Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Transfer Rumor: Bolton On Verge of First Signings

New Jersey Devils Win Consecutive Games First Time All Season in Hideous 2-1 Shootout Win over Calgary Flames

Ilya Kovalchuk scored in the shootout. This won the Devils a game they probably shouldn't have won based on their performance. (Photo by Paul Bereswill/Getty Images)

I'm not someone who goes about complaining about defensive hockey or the quality of the game too much. 99% of the time, I can appreciate what goes on the ice.  Sure, when the New Jersey Devils lose I'm not happy, but I can take why it happened. 

Tonight's game was an absolute horror show to watch at times.  In the preview for this game, I did say the Devils were in "by any means necessary" mode.  They got a 2-1 shootout win over the Calgary Flames.  That's all well and good, and in the long run, that matters most.  They got 2 points.  Mission accomplished.

At the same time, I'm still reeling from the stinky performance the Devils left in Newark.  The Devils didn't build on all of the lessons of the 5-0 win over Washington - which was my goal of the game for them.  The defense was perfectly fine, Johan Hedberg was great, but the offense - especially the puck movement - was pitiful.   It happens in the course of the season, but I believe this was a game the Devils won that perhaps they shouldn't have.

Here's the game summary and here's the event summary.  It's not a joke. It truly did take overtime for the Devils to crack 20 shots on goal.  Only in power plays did it seem like the Devils were able to string a few passes in Calgary's end.   There were long stretches of the game where the Devils failed to register a shot on net.  There were boneheaded passes on top of the poorly executed passes.  The guys in red scrambled on defense, but were out of sync and seemingly didn't communicate with each other on offense.  Somehow, Calgary never took advantage, Hedberg and the D kept New Jersey in the game, and they came up big in the shootout.

I'll gladly take the points, but that doesn't mean there should be no criticism. It's definitely warranted tonight. In any case, I have further thoughts after the jump. Please visit Matchsticks and Gasoline for a Calgary take.  If you want scoring chances, Kent Wilson has his counts here at Flames Nation.

Star-divide

I honestly feel bad for the Calgary Flames supporters.  I wish there was a time of possession stat in the NHL, because I'm pretty confident it would have shown Calgary having been dominant in that category.  Henrik Karlsson didn't have much to do in the second and third periods, didn't have a whole lot to do in the first either.  He really got challenged in OT, when he faced a 4-on-3 power play (which was good) and made one huge stop on Patrik Elias right at the crease.  Protecting a guy in his fourth NHL game ever was a goal for Calgary and I think they accomplished it. 

The Flames did an excellent job repeatedly keeping the Devils to the outside, stunting their offense further beyond the Devils shooting themselves in the foot as they were.  Speaking of, Brent Sutter clogged the neutral zone right from the start, exploited critical matchups, and basically outcoached John MacLean right out of his suit.  I don't believe many booed Sutter during the pregame annoucements, but I have to give the man some credit. He had a gameplan and his team carried it out to a "T." The Devils had no answer tactically for the Flames' traps, and their abysmal execution in passing the puck only worsened the cause.  They were, from what I saw, the better team.

Mind you, this does not mean they were good.  "Better," in this case, only means they were good relative to their opponent.   Just as the Devils' passing game was the equivalent of banging your head against a brick wall for 60 minutes, the Flames' was like just leaning your head against one for 60 minutes.  Despite picking up nearly every dump-in the Devils did, despite winning pucks in the neutral zone, despite picking up all of those turnovers in their own end, the Flames only led 17-14 in SOG at 5-on-5 according to the event summary.   The Corsi chart from Time On Ice indicates Calgary was better, but they had a few negative players as well.    I remain confused as to how Calgary managed to have the puck so much, yet not take full advantage.

Then I see another attempted pass either broken up or miss it's mark.   Tonight was truly a dreary and hideous game to witness.  Speaking of, here's the game highlights from NHL.com in case you missed this game:

That said, there are a few Devils that deserve some praise.  Take a bow, Mr. Johan Hedberg.  You absolutely robbed Jarome Iginla twice - including a left pad stop on a re-direction in the second period that still amazes me thinking about it hours after the game.  You were only beat on a deflection from Rene Bourque in traffic; a goal that I can't get angry about, as you had no chance on it.  You came up big in the shootout as well on the 25 other shots you stopped in the game proper.  I don't know why you weren't named the first start tonight, but you deserved it.

I'd also like to collectively thank the defense, too.  Based on the head to head ice time charts at Time on Ice, Colin White and Henrik Tallinder went up against Iginla, Olli Jokinen, and Alex Tanguay - Calgary's top line at evens.  While the line put up a combined 10 SOG; White managed to end up with a +1 Corsi and Tallinder was better at +4. That means when they were out there, they were up against tough competition who got their chances, but the Devils with them managed to get some rare offense.   That's good. As a whole, the effort was very much like Monday's in that they didn't allow too many shots in the slot, they cleaned up rebounds, and everyone was mostly in position.  My only complaint was some of their breakout passes were, well, garbage.

Ultimately, the putrid puck movement is why I can't really praise the offense tonight nor can I say this was a well earned win in a close game.  It was as if the team collectively had a bad day when it came passes.  You could have categorized them: Passes that were misfired, passes that just missed, passes that went straight to a Calgary stick or skate; passes that went for icing; passes that were fired too high; passes to no one; and even one pass that went to a player going onto the bench (which of course Calgary took).   This is how a team ends up with only 15 shots on net at the end of regulation.  

Yes, Mattias Tedenby created New Jersey's lone goal off a rebound - which hit David Clarkson's skate so he got credit for the goal (and took Tedenby's lone shot away).  But I really can't praise the forwards. Ilya Kovalchuk and Dainius Zubrus took the brunt of the damage at evens with -13 Corsi values each.  However, the Elias-Arnott-Tedenby line was muted.  Travis Zajac was totally off his game except on faceoffs. The fourth line continued to do not much but hustle - which isn't much at all.  This may sound overly negative, but I truly can't emphasize enough how bad the passing was tonight.  When the passes are off, there won't be many shots, possession keeps going to the other team, and that was on display before thousands of disgusted fans tonight.

At least the power play wasn't eye-pokingly bad when it came to passes.

Then there's the coaching.  A lot of the puck movement problems fall on the players and the players alone. MacLean and Larry Robinson aren't on the ice dishing out pucks.  However, MacLean had little answer for what Sutter was doing.  Sutter set up a trap and the Devils did little about it.  MacLean tried mixing up the lines to try and mess with Sutter's matchups, but to no avail.  MacLean at least reverted to the original lines later on from what I saw.

Still, there was little tactical adjustments that I saw.  The Devils spent most of their effort getting a stop on D, and proceeding to lose the puck on an errant pass or clear in the neutral zone or on offense.  The team did work hard, but it was only effective at one of end of the rink.   Above all, I felt the dump-ins were the most indicative of this inaction.  When the Calgary defense kept dropping back for the eventual dump in - and getting it - after a few shifts, it's time to try something else.  Yet, the Devils didn't try to do anything else.  No different approaches to force Calgary to do much else. They were just giving pucks away even when they weren't making a line change.  By the end of the game, no wonder it was as if the Devils were playing for the tie.  They weren't trying to snap the 1-1 deadlock in the third period, not with just 3 SOG!

The performance was uneven to say the least and while I really liked how Hedberg played and how the defense did, their inability to put Calgary on their heels outside of overtime was horrid.  On other nights against other teams, they will either get some breaks or just straight-up impose their will onto the Devils' in their own end with that lack of offense.  Hockey is a flowing game and it's difficult to get a win when things are going so poorly in one direction.  That's on both the players and the coaches.

Of course, the Devils did manage to get a win via the shootout. Kovalchuk can at least feel good about scoring a goal and Hedberg can feel even better for stopping three shots.  The Devils now have won two games in a row for the first time all season.  An optimist may point out that this game, while not a good one by NJ, should be viewed as a blessing in disguise. That they would have lost this game earlier in the year, but managed to get lucky, get a "W" in a close game, and the players (and coaches) can try to improve without feeling additional pressure that comes with a loss.  Fine, I can dig that.  But the last part is crucial.  This game proved that this team still has a long way to go.  Let us hope tonight's offensive performance was an anomaly.

Thanks for everyone who commented in the Gamethread; and thank you for reading.  I hope you all have a happy holiday. (Unless you don't celebrate Thanksgiving - then go enjoy Thursday).  What do you think about tonight's game? Perhaps I was too negative, but I was disgusted from watching this game in the stands to be honest.  Do you have a different take?  Please share your thoughts and feelings about tonight's game in the comments.

Comment 16 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

doc emrick

i tuned in late and heard a different play by play guy. anyone know what happened to doc tonight?

EthanM

by EjM on Nov 25, 2010 12:40 AM EST reply actions  

Probably celebrating the holiday early.

"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit." -Aristotle

by Tim G on Nov 25, 2010 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

It was an ugly win but I’ll take it. It could be worse, we could be islander fans…

by whatjusthappened on Nov 25, 2010 2:37 AM EST reply actions  

a "W" is a "W", we've got "'L's" playing much better

hey EJM… it was Chico (the normal announcer next to doc) and the sidelines interviewer taking over, that happens from time to time when Doc takes a night off… happens periodically for a number of reasons…

As usual I enjoyed your recap John, but for once I think I have a different mindframe… I felt it was too negative… As devils fans I think we have learned this season that playing better than the other team means nothing… the sad truth is that whoever is winning in the scoreboard is winning on the ice. I’ve been sick of seeing us outplaying or playing equally to a team only to lose or be blown out… I don’t care what we do on the ice, as long as we have the advantage on the board we are winning. We got a W tonight… which means all of our bad play is a mute point. I can see how covering our game play and our trends is important for the future of the team… but thats later on, and everyone knows team play changes from game to game… but for now we got a win… and wins are hard to come by…

right now I’ll take a sloppy win over a well played loss any day

Maybe this season has me cynical with final scores as compared to overall gameplay… what do you think John? Am I too far off base?

by 5th Shift on Nov 25, 2010 4:47 AM EST reply actions  

but I believe this was a game the Devils won that perhaps they shouldn’t have.

You’re right, but we’ve had enough games where the Devils have played well enough to win, but have been screwed out of it by streaks of bad bounces and horrific penalty calls. They were owed a win they didn’t deserve. They got it. Now they need to remember it takes more to win and get it done against a division opponent in the Islanders.

by njdss4 on Nov 25, 2010 6:16 AM EST reply actions  

This season, the Devils and their fans have deserved more points than is reflected by their record.

The Hockey Gods have been tough on the Devils this year, but even fallen angels such as the Devils must pay their due penance and await their Most Holy Redemption. But, they must remember, though, that Pride comes before Destruction, and Haughtiness before The Fall.

The Devils must remain humble, play cautiously, and stay patient as they await their just desserts.

by Alan Wright on Nov 25, 2010 8:56 AM EST reply actions  

P.S.

It’s arguable that the Devils “deserved” at least a point against St. Louis, who is 8th overall in the league as of the current standings. We know why the Devils may have “deserved” a point there and we’ve discussed it in that game thread and recap.

If we solidly defeat the Islanders on Friday afternoon, then I am confident we will put up a good fight in Philly on Saturday afternoon despite the quick turn-around.

As I said here, the next two-three weeks are crucial.

by Alan Wright on Nov 25, 2010 11:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Mooooose

Way to go Johan !! Great to see you growing in stature as a Devil, and the crowd is really getting behind you. You played an awesome game last night, and some of those saves were fabulous, especially on the SO.

by AlienDev on Nov 25, 2010 9:41 AM EST reply actions  

Forwards were terrible, D was good. Rolston and Clarkson together on a line – neither has any clue of where to position themselves or what to do in transition, it’s horrible to watch. Kovalchuk had probably his worst game as a Devil – I think they are trying to get him to not carry the puck end to end like he tends to, but this has led him to making drop passes and cross-ice passes in the defensive zone.

Volchenkov was a really great signing though, this guy can flat out play. people really underestimated what he’d bring coming back from injury – as i see it, he has replaced half of parise’s total team value.

by Triumph44 on Nov 25, 2010 10:37 AM EST reply actions  

I wouldn’t necessarily call it Ilya’s “worst game”, but it certainly wasn’t good. That cross-ice pass he threw with less than two minutes to play in the third had me almost tearing my hair out — that was a play that had “puck in the back of the net” all over it, and somehow it didn’t happen.

The way to keep Ilya from trying to dominate the puck like that is to have someone else who has puck-carrying tendencies on his line. As much good as we’ve seen out of Kovy-Zubrus-Vasyunov, neither of the other two play that style of game. Short of a trade, the only forward on the team who might lug the puck enough to keep Kovy from that style of game might be Elias…. and I don’t want to touch Elias-Arnott-Tedenby right now (even with last night’s game).

by acasser on Nov 25, 2010 11:53 AM EST up reply actions  

……. we had 4 scoring chances in regulation and calgary had 13… our offense was pretty brutal…. the best play of the night was the arnott elias passing in OT

by KovyisLove on Nov 25, 2010 10:55 AM EST reply actions  

Oh yeah, by the way Corrente played absolutely great tonight! made some great plays to take the puck away on the boards and on the rush

by KovyisLove on Nov 25, 2010 11:00 AM EST reply actions  

John while some people might say that your recap was a bit negative but it was right on the money. Some times the truth hurts when is against your team. The offensive must improve tomorrow against the dreadful Islanders since we now NEVER play well against the Flyers & Rangers.

by Old Puck 1 on Nov 25, 2010 11:28 AM EST reply actions  

Allow me to second everything John said above. I watched the game from the opposite end of the rink that John did…. so I didn’t even get the benefit of seeing the handful of times the Devils were effective on offense or the two times they actually put a puck in the net. But I don’t believe in throwing these back because they weren’t deserved — when your record is as lousy as the Devils’ is, you don’t have the privledge of being choosy.

MacLean was badly outcoached tonight — he didn’t have an answer to what the Flames were doing, and it was Hedberg who bailed him out (thought Moose deserved better than second star, but I can understand the media giving first star to a Calgary player considering how well they played as a team). And I wish he and Adam Oates would do something about the top PP unit (the one with Zubrus, Rolston, and Zajac), because it isn’t working as it is. Perhaps it’s time to move Kovy off the side boards by the left circle and put him back at the point? Ilya is not getting many opportunities from his spot as it is now.

Maybe Brent Sutter deserved better, as well, but perhaps this was a case of the “hockey gods” inflicting a little bit of karmic justice. Whatever, I’ll take it.

by acasser on Nov 25, 2010 11:50 AM EST reply actions  

And I wish he and Adam Oates would do something about the top PP unit (the one with Zubrus, Rolston, and Zajac)

Kovalchuk and Tallinder are on this PP unit as well. I do agree with you that this unit has been futile. I don’t know if that has to do with them starting the PP or they just don’t mesh well. The 2nd PP unit of Arnott, Elias, Tedenby, Clarkson, Greene created some chances and ultimately the lone goal (Arnott and Greene went off for Volchenkov and Corrente after the PP ended).

The overtime PP was good (Kovy, Arnott, Elias, Tallinder), yet why is Kovy always positioned for a sharp angle shot? Tallinder and Elias were up top. If I’m the defense, I’ll give Kovy the sharp angle and know the better shot will come from Elias (who had a couple shots blocked). Throughout all the PP’s, the players usually stay stationary.

Looking at the one goal, everybody was moving and got into good position (3 Devils were in the way of Corrente’s shots). Yes the shot got blocked, but they were in the slot, between the circles. If they did this on the PP, more chances and goals should come. I guess what I’m saying is bring on the umbrella. Three players is positions to shoot and two around the net, setting screens, getting loose pucks, etc.

In Lou We Trust: SBN Blog of the New Jersey Devils
"Hockey is the only job I know where you get paid to have a nap on the day of the game." - Chico Resch

by Matthew Ventolo on Nov 25, 2010 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t know that this first PP unit has much of a plan. It seems like they want to try and feed Kovalchuk for the one-timer, but defenses are keying on that and they simply haven’t adapted. I’m not a big fan of Kovy being on the boards by the left-wing circle, because I don’t know what good he’s doing there when defenses are ready for that and preventing the big shot. Maybe an umbrella would open things up — my thought being to put Rolston in the right-wing circle similar to Kovy in the left-wing circle, Tallinder up top, and Zajac in front of the net as well (even if he’s not ideal as a screen). One could also try shifting Kovalchuk to the left point (moving Zajac to the left-wing circle, and Rolston down to the right wing circle or high slot). Something needs to be done, because that PP isn’t good. It’s like they come out with one play, and don’t adapt if it isn’t working.

I liked the OT power play as well, although it is a different situation when you’ve only got three defenders and more space on the ice. The four-man PP units tend to play a diamond and set up those wide-angle shots, however…. and I don’t know that it works so well without a blaster at the point. I understand not wanting to play four forwards on that PP…. but I don’t know how you’re going to get Kovy loose to use that wicked shot of his if teams don’t have to respect the other shots as well.

Maybe it comes down to finding a D-man with a heavy shot to situate on the point near Kovalchuk to make teams back off a little bit. And maybe we just have to wait for Taormina to get healthy, since the team had some success with the man advantage when Kovy and Taormina were playing something of a two-man game.

by acasser on Nov 25, 2010 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the New Jersey Devils! New here? Check out the Rules and Guidelines before posting.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

The_official_web_site___new_jersey_devils_small
FOR THE LOVE OF THE DEVILS...PLEASE DON'T SELL YOUR TICKETS TO RANGERS FANS
Stanley_cup_wallpaper_small
Devils vs. Flyers -- Two Opposing Worlds Separated by 90 Miles

Recent FanPosts

Claude_small
Post your press conference question(s) for John Tortorella here.
Pig_face_small
Mar-ty, Hen-ke
Small
Top Secret Agent or Cranky Middle Aged Man?
Small
Karma, and Pucks, and Chips Oh My,
Small
No Blue Campaign -- Tickets for Sale
Small
On Shot Blocking
Scott_stevens_2_small
Strategy Adjustments to Defeat the Rangers (IMO)
Small
Harrold vs. Larsson
Lisrobot_small
Game 1 Albany Meetup
Scottyyy_small
How to beat the Rags

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

joomla visitors

Managers

Stanley_cup_and_you_-_sbn_small John Fischer

Authors

Puddy_small Tom Stivali

Marty_sbetter_small Matthew Ventolo

Zidlickymania_small Kevin Sellathamby

1729_small Matt Evans SNC