Henrik Lundqvist Shut Down New Jersey Devils, New York Rangers Win 3-1
In the recent losses of the last two weeks or so, fans have been "treated" to lethargic periods, poor decision making, tepid offense, and entire games without intensity in losses by the New Jersey Devils. Tonight, this was not a loss due to extraordinarily bad set of hockey. This was a loss due to the New York Rangers' goaltender, Henrik Lundqvist.
The Devils put 42 shots on net and Lundqvist stopped all but one. The shots were all over the place: from the point, in the slot, off rebounds, off deflections, from the circles, from the high slot, and in traffic. Henrik Lundqvist robbed the Devils at least seven times from a wide array of players ranging from Ilya Kovalchuk to Zach Parise to Mike Mottau (TWICE) to even a shot off of Andrew Peters. Lundqvist's glove side was undeniable tonight. The Devils aimed for the high glove side often and Lundqvist rose to the challenge every time. Even when that side was a wide open net, that dang glove just appeared seemingly out of nowhere!
Rangers fans should be thanking, praising, and loving Lundqvist's performance tonight. He and he alone ensured the Rangers win tonight. Outside of that, a four minute surge by the offense gave them the lead that made the score what it was. There is plenty of criticism that can be had for the Devils. That they took this game off or showed no fire or were totally out of sync or got burned by the Rangers - those are not true. Losing to a rival sucks, I don't like the loss, but I cannot honestly say the Devils were bad. They literally ran into a goaltender who acted as a mobile wall tonight.
Check out Blueshirt Banter later where they are likely ecstatic to have got a win and to see Lundqvist have such a big game after what transpired on Thursday. If you want just the stats and a neutral look, NHL.com has their recap up. Read on for my thoughts about tonight's game.
First and foremost, watch the highlights before you immediately comment about how the Devils wasted shots and such. No, Lundqvist literally rose up and was massive enough. When available, I will post Here is the highlight video from NHL.com as proof:
Now, let's talk about the Rangers' three goals. For most of the night, the Rangers' plan on offense was to try and set up that cross-ice pass down by the crease. Not a bad idea as if it gets to the target man, the goalie has next to no shot to stop it and it's an easy shot. It only really worked once, largely in part of Ryan Callahan bursting off the boards at the right time, noticing Andy Greene's attempted poke check, and then finding the space to the waiting Marian Gaborik. Martin Brodeur had no chance on that unless he was psychic, which he's not, so there.
That goal was huge, not just because it was a power play but it awoken a lion in the Rangers. Madison Square Garden actually started making some noise (really!) and the Rangers looked confident going forward instead of not quite together. The next two goals came quick and they hurt. Mike Mottau cleans up a chance in front created by Callahan and sees Ilya Kovalchuk by the point, so he figures to pass it to him. Only Callahan was wheeling around, blocked out Kovalchuk, takes a step and fires a bomb. Great individual play by Callahan - he was the best Ranger skater tonight with a goal, assist, and 5 shots on goal - and a bad decision by Mottau. He should have either fired it off the boards or skated up looking for someone else.
Honestly, that was only Mottau's real major error of the night - and the guy was smart at both ends all night long. He jumped up on plays smartly, even on the penalty kill, and was robbed twice. If anything, the defense tonight wasn't so bad short a few miscues by Andy Greene among others.
The third goal against, well, the Rangers fourth line just breaks out in an odd man rush. Mottau was back but there was nothing for him to do. Mark Fraser was too deep to do anything when Chris Drury got the puck in the slot. Fraser kneeled and appeared to screen Brodeur, and Drury just fired it over Brodeur's shoulder. Of all three goals, maybe Brodeur should have got that one, but I would credit that more of a great shot through a little screen than anything else. I don't think Devils fans should fault Brodeur too much for tonight's loss.
From then, the Rangers curiously started to slip back into their old ways for much of the game, sensing that was all they needed to do. They were right only because Henrik Lundqvist played as well as he did. Even if Mottau made a better clearance and if the Rangers didn't have that odd man rush, they were still behind the eight ball for much of the game. Call it a short meltdown, but the Devils eventually recovered in the second period.
The Devils were robust in their attack all night long, as they continually outshot the Rangers: 10-7 in the first, 12-10 in the second, and 20-5 in the third. These weren't weak shots on net, no they were strong shots. Jacques Lemaire decided on ZZ Pops as the first line and Patrik Elias, Dainius Zubrus, and Ilya Kovalchuk on the "second" line. All six forwards got big minutes (least among them: Langenbrunner's 18:26) and had plenty of shots. Kovalchuk alone had 8 shots and 25:05 of ice time and all I can really complain about is that he got goaded into being in the box by jerk-extraordinaire Sean Avery late in the game. ZZ Pops had 11 (Parise - 4, Zajac - 2, Langenbrunner - 5); and the "second" line combined for 13 (Kovalchuk - 8, Elias - 3, Zubrus - 2). Honestly, on another night or against a different goaltender, they probably would have lit up the scoreboard several times.
And that doesn't include how good the third line was. Brian Rolston and Rob Niedermayer put 4 shots on net each too, while providing additional pressure down low. Again, I cannot emphasize this enough, Lundqvist was the Rangers' defense tonight. Moreover, Lemaire kept the lines together largely because they did so consistently well on the attack. The only change seen was Andrew Peters being benched in the third and having a winger - usually Zach Parise - double shifted for Dean McAmmond and Vladimir Zharkov.
Elias looked fine in his return from his concussion/concussion-symptoms. He played 22:35, had 3 shots on net, and displayed all kinds of slick moves when necessary. His vision was present, his stickhandling was sound, he made an impact on the ice, and he made the important pass into the slot that Dainius Zubrus dashed home right in front for the Devils' sole goal. Which went high stick side. Not that if the Devils changed the focus of their shots they would have scored more, it really was a point-blank shot. Had Lundqvist stopped that, it would have been pure luck.
What can be criticized about the offense was their power play. No, I'm not going to kill the Devils for not scoring on a 5-on-3. It was a 17 second 5-on-3 and while Rolston losing the puck at the point was beat, by the time the puck was there, the time was up. The Devils needed to win the faceoff there and Zajac didn't (only one of 5 lost for him, he went 13 for 18 overall). The only thing I'll criticize on that was Lemaire calling for a time out before the 17 seconds happened.
No, I'm more concerned about the other power plays the Devils had. Out of 5 power plays totaling 8:09 of time, they got 5 shots on net. In a night where the Devils put shots up at a ridiculous rate and attempted even more (Devils missed 12 times and were blocked 18 times), the power play had to be more rapid-fire. I believe in setting up a shot, but too many times they were looking for a shot from the point where there wasn't one. Sure, the Rangers have the great PK unit with a 85.4% rate and wanted to do better after a bad Thursday night effort. But they needed to mix it up. Maybe a problem of too many talents together in such a short time? I mean, the penalty killers got as many shots! (An indictment of the Rangers' power play outside of the one goal?)
But at the end of the day, Henrik Lundqvist remains the big, giant, massive reason the Devils didn't win tonight. The effort was there, the desire was apparent, and the fire was present on the ice. Yet the short second period meltdown dug the grave and the Rangers' goaltender kept knocking the ladder away from getting out. Everything but a kitchen sink was thrown at Lundqvist and he probably could have stopped the sink too. An unfortunate loss felt worse because it was at the hands of Our Hated Rivals. I hope the Devils don't go into Philadelphia on Monday feeling discouraged about their attempts because all that will lead to are continued struggles.
Thanks to Steve for putting the GameThread together and thanks to you all for the comments. I don't recall any GameThread going over 400+ comments, so a big thanks to all who showed up. Feel free to leave your thoughts, feelings, concerns, and complaints in the comments.
0 recs |
26 comments
|
Comments
players need to jell.
From what I have seen so far it seems to me that they are trying to get the puck to Kovy too often instead of just playing their game the way they normally do. I believe that the more they play together the better it will be. It is a shame that the olympic break is coming soon because then they will go another 2 weeks without playing with each other..More on this tomorrow it is late and have to sleep after this dissapointing loss.
Donald Vasquez
Kovalchuk
Was at the game . . . what did Avery say to piss off Kovy?
I have respect for most sports fans with 2 exceptions: NY Ranger fans who grew up in New Jersey, and Dallas Cowboy fans who can't name the capital of Texas.
Kovy and the D
I felt our offense was trying to get the puck to kovy as well. I really felt our D was not there at all. I say Lou needs to find a solid d man to help out martin. If he doesnt we may be in trouble. I give the rangers there due. Henry did play a great game. However, I truly felt marty was given no help from our D. That Gaborick goal is a good example
Avery
Reaaallly looking forward to the remaining Leafs vs Rangers game when Phaneuf gets a chance to put a dent in that &*()s face. I’d expect Marty would give Kovy a crash course on Ignoring Avery 101.
As for the remainder of the game… yes, the three breakdown goals were frustrating, but the amount of offensive pressure the Devils put out was extremely impressive. I don’t recall any other game this year where the Devils had such quality chances from all four lines and even the defense. Tonight was just bad luck… it seems Lundqvist plays horribad against other teams in preparation for the Devils (seriously.. why is this guy only amazing against us?)
Impressed by the chemistry already on display in the Kovalchuk-Zubrus combo and recently, Elias.. didn’t see any blaring defensive lapses like the Toronto game, but the second period remains to haunt this team. This is the biggest problem with the team at this point IMHO.
We definitely did start and finish the game strongly from an offensive perspective. But overall, I can’t be as optimistic as I’d like to be after this game. Yes, Lundqvist stood on his head tonight and yes we did put on a lot of offensive pressure with some real quality chances. But we really really need to be stronger in the second period of games as of late.
Although I’m not going to kill the Devils either for not scoring on the short 5-on-3, in my opinion it certainly did create momentum for the Rangers when they killed it off along with the rest of the 5-on-4. The first goal for the Rangers provided them with way too much open ice right in front of Marty. Watching the replay, the only guy I really saw defending down low was Andy Greene —-not a good idea when facing Callahan coming off the boards and Gaborik right on the door step.
Yes, maybe Mike Mottau did only make one remarkably large blunder tonight, but it led to the second goal for the Rangers which was huge in terms of the momentum of the game. I don’t care if he only made one mistake or twenty in tonight’s game, the one he did make ultimately cost the Devils big time. I thought the third goal was just an unfortunate odd-man rush at an inopportune time.
On a more positive note, it was great to see Elias back in the line up and pick up the only Devil’s assist in the game. He and Kovy certainly seemed to have some chemistry and really supported each other after the game when talking to the press. I have also been very happy with Zubrus’ play in the last couple of games. He has become a bigger presence offensively in my opinion.
All in all, I’m obviously not pleased with tonight’s results but truly believe that the pieces will fall into place for the Devs and we will have a complete game very soon. Having 42 shots on goal is certainly an indicator that good things will come.
I think that really sums it up. Thanks.
SIDE NOTE: Highlight video added.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
Im happy Kovalchuk went after Avery.
1. It shows a division rival that Kovy is not F’n around. (pardon my french)
2. This “rental” will punch a dude in the face for a teammate if he gets out of line.
3. This will not happen come playoff time.
4. The Devils should be able to score without him.
5. Game was most likely lost anyway. But even if they tied, no guarantee of earning more than a point…… and Kovy will earn us many more points in the near future….AND its Sean Avery.
….Elias + Kovy = lethal.
by they can take a player but not the core on Feb 7, 2010 2:59 AM EST reply actions
the defense is not as bad as everyone says.
The defense is still one of the best in the NHL. There have been a few games when they gave up a large amount of shots but for the most part they have been sound. I still believe if this team could score 3 to 4 goals a game on most nights they would get a w every time. As for Marty he has been looking great on saves from close in but the long shots from the point are going in way too often lately. You can blame the defense but Marty was making those saves earlier in the year. I believe once the players learn to play together more with Kovy and do not try to set him up all the time the offense will click better.
Donald Vasquez
Avery is one smart player
While all of you are commending Kovy for fighting with him, Avery is one intelligent Hockey Player to intentionally coax Kovalchuk into a fight with 3 or so minutes left. He saw what was happening and that if the Devils kept at they hit in their 2nd goal. So what does he do, he neutralizes the Devils most potent forward by taking him our of the rest of the game.
I wish the Devils had a pest of Avery’s skill.
Avery is one smart player ?
This Devils team does not need a player like Avery, who is everything wrong with the “new” NHL. What this Devils team need is more hard nose old time Devils players. We have some under current issues facing this team during the last couple of weeks. This team is not ready to play in the first period and we fall behind by two goals. Enough has been said about the shortcoming of our Defense, and JL said that he is happy with their work in our own end and their lies the problem. The condense schedule seem to have hit our older players we all know who they are and the break next week is the best medicine for this tired team.
He may be "smart"
but he’s still a punk. I’d never want someone like him on our team.
Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.
When there's a WILL there's a WAY
Oh really?
So you guy’s hated Claude Lemieux? I don’t think so… Skilled pests are a huge asset and the team is without one. I’m not syaing you need oen to win, But i personally love the dynamic they add to the game.
You can hate Avery all you want for all the shit he said and pulls on the devils, but that doesn’t discount the fact that he has a good hockey I.Q. What he did with Kovy at the end of the 3rd period was genius on his part.
I don’t understand how he’s “everything that’s wrong with the game”. He makes whatever game he’s in fun and exciting to watch, how is that wrong for the game? Like it or not there is a psychological aspect to playing Hockey (any sport really) and he’s a master at exploiting it.
The big difference is that Avery goading Kovalchuk was all he really did that was positive for NY all night. He played 10:07, had no shots on net, took a minor for slashing in the first period that gave the Devils a PP, wherein he slashed/hit Kovalchuk away from the play as retaliation for Kovalchuk checking him. Avery was a non-factor at best outside of that situation.
Claude Lemieux would have been involved in the offense much more as he actually had offensive skill. He annoyed AND burnt teams regularly going forward.
He’s about as fun as Tyson Nash or Tie Domi. I’m not going to say he’s “everything that’s wrong with the game,” he’s just an honorless chump. Make of that what you will.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
That's not true
He had a great rush on Brodeur right out of the penalty box that he then took a crappy shot wide with.
And again goading Kovy into that fight in the last few minutes of a Devils onslaught in the 3rd was HUGE. This wasn’t Rob Neidermeyer he goaded into that fight, he intentionally targeted the Devils top offensive threat and took him out of the equation on the middle of a huge Rangers downswing. How you don’t see that as a big deal, is beyond me.
And come on lets, be fair here, with Avery. He has decent offensives skill which when given the chance to use like with the Kings and his firt go with the rangers he can very much be a factor. Tortella really just does not use him to his potential.
There's a reason
66% of the NHL hates Sean Avery the most out of any other player
All of because the reasons others have put more eloquently than I could
Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.
When there's a WILL there's a WAY
There’s a difference, in my mind, between a pest player and a guy like Avery. One can be a pest without resorting to cheap shots and questionable behavior that pushes up against, and often crosses the line of, sportsmanship.
For my money I’ll take a Clarkson over an Avery or an Ott or a Neil or a Ruutu any day.
Come on man, Clarkson’s game is not that of a pest at all. And like him or not, Avery does not pull the cheap hits everyone else you mentioned there is prone. Avery’s game is getting into the opposing teams head. You guys want to call it “unhonorable”, whatever… but it isn’t illegal.
A lot of what he does isn’t illegal… which is what makes it so bad, until it becomes illegal. If it was, he’d be thrown out of the game like the garbage that he is.
He makes a mockery of the game. Going up to a goalie in a playoff series and waving your arms and stick in front of his face like a five-year-old until the NHL is forced to amend its rules? Disgrace. Sure, Rangers fans see him as a champion, but that’s only because you don’t have to suffer from that crap.
He’s been known to cross over into illegal. The only example I can think of off the top of my head (and I refuse to search around for Avery lowlights) is him skating up behind a goalie (Tim Thomas, maybe?) who was stretching or something and “accidentally” hitting him in the back of the head with his stick… but there are more.
I understand Avery’s role, but there are many players who fulfill the same role on other teams but that aren’t such colossal weeds about it… and yes, I count Clarkson among them. He’s laid off a bit this season because with his burgeoning offensive contribution he’s more important to have on the ice than in the penalty box, but he’s out there jawing at opposing benches and “accidentally” bumping goalies and talking smack during face-offs, too.
That Avery is dishonorable is unquestionable. It may not be illegal, but it most certainly betrays the spirit of the game, which is, at its core, what keeps us watching. Any schlep with some ability can don the skates and do what he does. He’s not original or fresh or innovative… he’s just willing to cross lines no one else has before because they had the dignity and respect not to.
Avery
Avery has the right to be a pest during the game but he is mostly a punk with little talent unlike Claude Lemieux who could actually play and score big goals . Avery only goes after skill players who will not fight back and is protected by Colon Campbell and his refs. This is what is wrong with the game.
The loss was a tough one to swallow, especially since it was against the Rangers and especially because it was due in large part to a momentary reversion to the poor form we’ve seen lately, but I’m encouraged by the offensive pressure.
The top two lines were impressive, and even the third and fourth lines were pressing and playing well. On a different day or against a different goalie, that game goes the other way. It didn’t, but I’m far less discouraged than I would be normally.
I think we’re starting to see the team turn that corner back to being as good as we all know they can be.
I’d like to see just a little less “get the puck to Kovalchuk” though. He’s good, but he’s far more effective if he’s incorporated into the offense rather than relied upon to do all the scoring in all situations.
devs defense
i dont think the defense is that bad and obviously will be boosted by martin’s return but ive said this before mottau and white together are terrible and lemaire loves throwing them out there. When Martin comes back one of them has to go. Also I hate in overtime how he never puts Fraser out if White can play in overtime so can he. I dont blame White for the poor play he was supposed to be the next Stevens and the new NHL really screwed him plus the eye injury but either him or Mottau has to go
by centralnj devfan on Feb 8, 2010 12:50 PM EST reply actions
Can you give the White/Mottau bashing a rest already?
Do you watch games, for most fo the season the two have not only been the teams but the leagues best defensive defensemen.

by 


















