Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Which Players Will Join The 3,000-Hit Club?

New Jersey Devils Beat Down Rival New York Rangers 6-3

Maybe it was the practice upon returning from Edmonton on Monday.

Maybe it was the heart-to-heart meeting the team had among themselves on Tuesday.

Maybe it was just the fact that they were playing Our Hated Rivals on Wednesday night.

Whatever you think it was, I'm just glad they did it. 

The New Jersey Devils did not just beat the New York Rangers. They out-hit them. They out-hustled them. They out-worked them. They even chased Henrik Lundqvist and tacked one more past his backup, Alex Auld.  By and large, they out-played them.  There was no period of failure. There was no part of a period where the Devils looked terrible and nearly lost the game.  Was the Devils' performance perfect? No. There is definite room for criticism.  But for the first time in a long time, I can definitively say that the Devils were the better team tonight and the score reflects that.

Every Devils fan and supporter should be smiling after this one.  The Devils won 6-3 over Our Hated Rivals.   Here's the NHL.com recap, complete with links to all of the stats from tonight's game.  Check out Blueshirt Banter for the Rangers' perspective.  It's not happy over there. The loss was their fourth straight and the Rangers' playoff hopes are becoming bleaker.  NYRBlogger has the Rangers-based recap up.  Read on for my further thoughts and a very important question.

Star-divide

First, have a video of game's highlights from NHL.com.  It'll help explain what I'm about to say:

I honestly felt bad for Martin Brodeur and Henrik Lundqvist tonight.  Between the two, 8 goals were given up and nearly all of them weren't their fault.  They both suffered from very poor defensive play.  Such as costly errors on defense; the biggest one was Mark Fraser's coughing up the puck en-route to Brandon Prust.   Such as defensemen standing around instead of going after a loose puck; like Rob Niedermayer's and Zach Parise's goals where they put in a second rebound for a goal and Erik Christensen's move to the slot where he just walked in and scored a highlight reel goal.  Such as just some bad bounces, like the three deflected shots - Vinny Prospal on Bryce Salvador's shot, Jamie Langenbrunner redirecting Mike Mottau's shot Dan Girardi's on Brian Rolston's shot - that beat Lundqvist. And then there was Vinny Prospal's first goal (ha) where no Devil thought to cover him down low.

Talk about some bad luck intermixed with being hung out to dry. For both goalies.  But I'm really adamant about Lundqvist. Rangers fans, please, this man cannot be solely to blame for tonight.  I know it's great to taunt Henrik Lundqvist and the fans at the Rock let him hear it; it's great that he got pulled. But, really, he isn't the one to blame for the Rangers' loss tonight.   I know, I know, I'm defending a Ranger; but it's true.  What more could have he done on those shots?  Smack every Ranger defenseman upside the head after the first period and yelling at them to play with their heads out of their respective orifices?

At least the Devils' defense sharpened up after the third goal against - except for Fraser, he was benched after the Prust goal - and really closed the game off in the third period.   Good adjustments by the coaches and the players.  The Devils did let up a bit, they wanted to play a more conservative third period and protect their two goal lead, which I think is understandable given the last two months. The Rangers ending up having the puck more often.  I think the Devils were trying to trap the Rangers, but the Blueshirts kept finding ways through.  Yet, every red-jerseyed player made the additional effort to prevent shots, disrupt passes, and clean up any loose pucks.  Brodeur looked solid and as evidence of how well they worked, despite having most of the possession, the Rangers only put up 6 shots on net.

Oh, and the Devils still managed to get an insurance goal from Travis Zajac with a big assist by Auld's five-hole. That was big for me.  The three Ranger goals tonight were defense-deficient or defense-assisted; I was so nervous that the Devils would make a critical error and allow the Rangers toget back into the game. When that puck trickled in, I began to relax. 

Back to the defense: the Rangers didn't even reach 20 shots tonight.  Great. Still, I was and am not at all happy with how no one picked up Prospal before he scored; how Martin Brodeur had to absolutely rob Olli Jokinen of a 99%-sure-as-sure-can-get-goal in a little 2-on-Brodeur; how every Devil not named Brodeur stood and watched Christensen take the puck to the net; and how Fraser coughed up the puck and no one picking up Prust on the rebound.  Giving up goals not long after scoring them just kills momentum. At least, that what it normally does. That has to be addressed going forward.

Moreover, and more importantly, that the Devils scored goals later on in response to the Rangers' equalizers.  They didn't give up successive goals, they didn't waver after the Rangers cashed in.  No, they kept attacking throughout the first 40 minutes and playing more opportunistic in the third period.  Even on a penalty kill, they were aggressive and had a few scoring chances of their own.   Whenever they felt they could win the puck from a Ranger, they went for it - be it a stick lift, a stick check, a body check, a block.  With 14 official giveaways (5 by Brodeur strangely), the Devils nearly paid dearly at times (and, well, did, thanks to Prust).  Overall, it paid dividends as the Devils took on numerous 3-on-2s, kept possession alive hard on the boards, outscored the Rangers 3-2 in the second period (YEAH!), and generally getting multiple turnovers from the Rangers in the neutral zone in the first two periods (maybe that's why they tried to trap in the third?).

I don't know who I can honestly say was the best Devil on the ice, but I was impressed by the offense as a while.  The first, second, and third lines all scored tonight. The power play scored a goal, the unit finished 1 for 2 tonight. The centers won 54% of the faceoffs tonight.  The Devils as a whole put up 27 shots, got blocked only 6 times, and missed the net only 8 times.  Very nice overall for the team.

Ilya Kovalchuk was more in a creative role, making the space and the plays that allowed Jamie Langenbrunner and Patrik Elias to put 4 shots apiece on the Rangers.   Dainius Zubrus looked real good next to Parise (who wasn't just a scorer with a goal, an assist, and 1 shot, but a banger with 5 hits) and Travis Zajac.  Brian Rolston had one of his best games in a long time with 4 shots, a goal, and an assist.  Rob Niedermayer (1 G, 1 A, 2 SOG, +3) looked like Scott Niedermayer at times with the way he was skating and moving the puck.  Rod Pelley was even throwing out some hits, justifying his spot.

Granted, the Devils got a lot of benefits from good bounces and the Rangers' defense, who played very poorly tonight.  Still, they created those odd-man rushes, they made those shots happen, and now they have every reason to feel confident about it.  Among them all, the one that impressed me the most was on a shift in the second period, the Devils had an offensive zone faceoff.  Zubrus gets thrown out of the dot and Zajac takes the draw.  There's a little scrum, Parise comes out with the puck, and Zubrus and Zajac both jump up and it's a 3-on-2.  Lundqvist made the stop; but seriously an odd man rush starting from their own blueline and forward.  That's how good the forwards were in those first two periods. That's how bad the Rangers' defense was tonight.

I'm sure you (the reader) and I can go on and on about how well the Devils worked tonight, how the offense was effective, how the coaching was solid, how the defense played much tighter in the third, and how this was something that they needed.  The postgame post with all the quotes from the players and Jacques Lemaire form Tom Gulitti echoes all that and more.  It's great stuff.  There's just one big elephant in the room, though. And it's not in considering how Anssi Salmela will look in Fraser's spot:

Can they do it again on Friday against the Pittsburgh Penguins

In my opinion, I'm not ready to call an end to the slump or the struggles or whatever you call it until the Devils can string some solid performances together.  I'd love to see this team finally get two wins in a row; but I'm not looking for a ridiculous hot streak (though I wouldn't complain). I just don't want to see New Jersey follow up all the good they did tonight with a stinker at the Rock on Friday.  I want the Devils to play solid, Devils hockey more often - like tonight.

Thanks for reading.  Thanks to Steve for the GameThread.  Please leave all your thoughts, feelings, complaints, and criticisms in the comments.   For now, let's be happy over a big win over Our Hated Rivals.  (P.S.  One final note, shame on all the fans who thought it was important to yell something during the national anthem and/or get into fights in the upper sections.  I don't care who you support, either grow up or don't come to the Rock.)

Comment 28 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I was actually surprised Niedermayer wasn't one of the 3 Stars.

He was fantastic tonight.

And I kinda feel bad for Fraser. I know he was trying to pass it to McAmmond, who had just skated by, but it was just a bad move to throw the puck right in front of the net like that. I still think he’s a good defenseman, but I understand why Lemaire benched him.

by brodeur on Mar 11, 2010 12:07 AM EST reply actions  

Third Line

I was really impressed with the way the 3rd line (Rolston, Clarkson, Nieds) played tonight. They were making a lot of things happen, they defended pretty well and then would get good penetration into the offensive zone. It’s good to be able to see an effort like this from the 3rd line, obviously because it takes pressure off our top two lines to score and it forces the other team to try to match 3 lines worth of talent instead of focusing on the top 2. While I don’t expect them to play like this every game, a key moving forward is definitely getting more production out of these guys. Our last 10 goals scored by forwards (in even strength situations) have all been scored by guys on the top 2 lines. In fact, you have to go back 6 games (not including tonight) to the game against Philly on February 10th to find a 3rd liner who scored (Niedermeyer). Ultimately you’re going to get the most production out of your top two lines, that’s why they are where they are. The point is that I believe we really need to show some scoring depth if we wanna make a solid run this year.

by JoeyV on Mar 11, 2010 12:10 AM EST reply actions  

Great Game

3rd line was really good tonight and Niedermayer(and i cant believe im going to say this) looked like one of the best fowards on the ice. He was skating with effort and put up a goal and assist. Real good game for the offense and Marty. the defense wasnt great but not bad. Letting Christensen just walk in like that a score was ridiculous and Fraser should be ashamed of that absolutely horrible give up of the puck. Other then those 2 mistakes the defense was ok. Hopefully they can bring this energy to Pittsburgh. A surprisingly good stat i saw today was that in the four meetings that the devils all won against the pens, they only let up 2 goals in the 4 of the games, i didn’t realize that, thats really good against a team like the Penguins

by NJDevilsSteve on Mar 11, 2010 1:45 AM EST reply actions  

Yeah in fact we havent given up a goal to them since the first period of our second meeting…meaning we havent conceded a goal to the penguins in 168 minutes 28 seconds.

by JoeyV on Mar 11, 2010 1:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Is anybody else as surprised as I am that Lundqvist was pulled last night? The Rangers were only down by two goals, there was still plenty of time left in the game for them to make some kind of comeback, most of the goals weren’t his fault, and the Rangers were scoring at a high pace so they very well could have comeback. I thought that when this happened, they team basically conceded that they weren’t going to win this game and I thought the rest of the Rangers folded like a bunch of lawn chairs once Lundqvist left. Doc had mentioned that this move was probably made by the Rangers coaching staff to spark some kind of momentum shift but I found it to be just the opposite. I just found the move to be surprising and after Henrik left, the Rangers were a shell of themselves.

Now, onto to the Devils performance. This was the most emotional and aggressive game I have seen the Devils play in literally two months now. Right off the bat, this every single player was instantly aggressive, throwing their bodies around and making some huge open ice hits. The backchecking and forechecking were both better than it has been for as long as I can remember. Doc also mentioned that, after the sixth goal, Devils defensemen had six out of the potential eighteen points for the night. When was the last time you could say that happened? I think that might have been a topic brought up during the meeting; for the defense to have a more active role in the offensive zone. I also thought another topic might be not letting the defense hang to dry when they’re stuck in their own zone; forward need to help out in order to get the puck out. Barring a couple of defensive lapses (Prust should never have been able to score), the entire defensive core actually played considerably well.

"We aim above the mark to hit the mark." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson

by Tim G on Mar 11, 2010 7:20 AM EST reply actions  

I don’t think that pulling Lundy was a direct reflection of his play but a move to spark the team. Seeing him on the bench after he looked pretty pissed off and I don’t blame him, he didn’t get a lot of help and was a victim of a lot of redirected shots. Just like Broduer hasn’t in recent weeks.

I hope that Torts explained to him why later on but even Resch said that only Torts knows why Lundy was pulled.

It wasn’t a complete game by the Devils, mistakes were made but it was the best effort put fourth in a very long time. I hope it continues for the remainder of the season into the playoffs. It’s nice to have something to cheer about.

You're Next!

by thatguy011071 on Mar 11, 2010 8:15 AM EST up reply actions  

I’ll take the result and hope the team can actually build on the success in a way they haven’t been able to lately, but even in the highest spirits I’ve been in about this team in weeks, I still can’t help but feel that the first star of this game should have been Lady Luck.

Three of the goals were lucky deflections (Salvador’s and Rolstons [which had no Earthly right going in off of the slowest developing, ugliest 3 4-on-1 you’re ever likely to see] off of Rangers defenders and Langenbrunner’s behind-the-back I-couldn’t-do-that-again-in-50-tries deflection); two were uncharacteristic rebounds by Lundqvist (Niedermayer’s and Parise’s PPG); and the last, by Zajac, was a complete softie by Auld.

Now, I’m not taking them away from the team because they were lucky; as any coach will tell you, you make your own luck. It wasn’t by accident that Niedermayer and Parise were in the right spots at the right time for the rebounds, and deflections off of defenders happen in nearly every game, as do soft goals, though it is pretty rare that they all happen in a row like that. No, goals are good no matter how they happen, and the way the Devils were playing, it was likely they’d have scored 4 or 5 of them eventually anyway, regardless.

My happiness, however, is tempered by the fact that after each of the first three goals scored for, they gave up a goal in the same way they’ve been struggling with… and I can’t help but feel that with one or two less spectacular saves by Marty (stick save robbery on Jokinen, anyone?) or if the Rangers were even just slightly more potent offensively to take advantage of some of the Devils’ defensive gaffes they let slip through their fingers, this game would have gone the other way.

Again, the results are what matters, and it was great to see a Rob Niedermayer sighting and Zubrus continuing his strong play since his return from injury, and the guys playing as a team rather than four guys who try to get Kovalchuk the puck at all costs (speaking of, even though he was held off the score sheet, his presence was definitely felt… literally in the case of his throwing hits like they were Mardi Gras beads—kudos to him), but I’m curbing my enthusiasm until they can show me that this game wasn’t just a flash in the pan and guys like Rolston and Nieds won’t disappear again, as is their wont, and they can actually build on this and not rest on it.

by elesias on Mar 11, 2010 8:39 AM EST reply actions  

Nothing wrong with lady luck making an appearance. How long have we had bounces not go our way? It’s part of the game and it’s good to be on the side benefiting from the lucky bounce or redirection for a change. Sitting in section 232 (which was rowdy beyond belief i must mention) maybe I saw the game with my heart while wearing a few pairs of beer goggles, but thinking back today, our team played great. Some mistakes YES, definitely, atrocious, (and yes they were typical of how we were losing games), but we did something that we were not able to do often during the bad stretch; we responded. Not only that. We did a few other things that we weren’t doing. We scored first, we had a power play goal, we killed penalties, and we weathered the 2nd period.

With the level of bad play that we had for the last 2 months, righting this ship will not happen in 1 game with a complete 180. It can’t be that fast and easy because our team will fall back to poor play thinking it will come easy. It will be gradual like we saw last night. It will take a fight.

Clarkie, great to have you back. Parise’s work ethic was great. I remember thinking each time i saw him on the ice, “awesome! Zach is out there again” Lastly, thank god I have to only write this because my voice is horse from all the shouting during the game last night. What an experience for what was my first Devils/rags game.

...and it's 6 - 3, New Jersey!!!

by Devil_Hard_Core on Mar 11, 2010 10:17 AM EST reply actions  

Agree with article commentary, hopefully this was not just a case where the stars were lined up perfectly that we got this win only to go back our next few games sleepwalking as a team again. As fans obviously we are hoping this is going to be the start of a positive turnaround for us and if it is I will look to two events as the helpful causes, one is; the Edmonton shutout loss,( this proved to anyone on the team who were in denial that we needed help) and the private meeting they had and more specifically the words of Langenbrunner within that meeting.

by eppy on Mar 11, 2010 10:34 AM EST reply actions  

Next game

The Devils have not been able to string 2 in a row for some time now. It may be actually good that they’re playing Pittsburgh. They’re undefeated and they seem to get up for these games, not like lesser opponents. it will be interesting to see which Devils show up.

I have respect for most sports fans with 2 exceptions: NY Ranger fans who grew up in New Jersey, and Dallas Cowboy fans who can't name the capital of Texas.

by Cherno77 on Mar 11, 2010 10:57 AM EST reply actions  

I know what you mean.

by eppy on Mar 11, 2010 7:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Devils performance

Last night we saw a lot of good things happen but the Devils still need to improve in certain areas. First the good things. We have now seen Brodeur play two consecutive games in which he played relatively well. Even though he gave up 2 goals in Edmonton and let in 3 on 13 against the Rangers, he was making the saves that he shouldn’t need to make, something that has become an expectation for the Devils. 4 of the 5 goals can be attributed to defensive breakdowns as well, and not poor performance by Brodeur. Next, some of the defenseman played well. Mottau had a good game. The best defenseman for the Devils was probably Martin Skoula. There were obviously bad defensive breakdowns, but going through the goals, with the exception of Fraser assisting on the Rangers third goal, you can blame the entire team rather than just the defense. There was also opportunities being produced by all 4 lines, and the 3rd line was the most successful, taking advantage of the Rangers lack of real depth. The power play produced despite only have two chances. The line changes that were made throughout the game worked well (i.e. Zubrus with Zajac and Parise). And most importantly, they produced 6 goals, 5 of which on a goalie that has a 1.5 GAA against the Devils, and came out with the win.

On the other hand, there is a major problem that people haven’t really talked about yet. Kovalchuk. He has not fit in with Elias, does not seem to be able to connect very many passes with his teammates, and just doesn’t seem to fit into the Devils system. There is no question that he is a very talented player, but with the exception of having him on the power play, he has not produced. Now one could argue that he is still developing chemistry with his line mates, but he now has 10 games under his belt with the team and has yet to really mesh with Elias. I’m starting to think the Devils should bring Clarkson up with Elias and Zubrus and leave Kovalchuk on the third line, where he will face a weaker 3rd line and perhaps be given more chances to just take the puck on his own. He would also be working with Rolston then, who he plays with a lot during the power play anyway.

I also felt Leblond should be kept in the lineup over Andrew Peters from now on. The 4th line did really well.

by NJPenguins08 on Mar 11, 2010 11:22 AM EST reply actions  

Thats a pretty bold statement, NJPenguins08. Although Kovy has yet to fit into the nitch that is the New Jersey Devils system, there isn’t a chance in hell that they would ever drop him to the third line. I understand your point….maybe against the oppositions third line, he might get different looks. But realistically, it will never happen. That would eat into the minutes he should be getting every game, and it would demoralize him.

"We aim above the mark to hit the mark." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson

by Tim G on Mar 11, 2010 12:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed.

Besides, he may not have been on the score sheet, but he had an effect out there. Teams just have to respect him, and that opens up everything else. He was throwing hits and forechecking strongly and even backchecking well.

Personally, I thought it was his best game as a Devil yet, precisely because he (and the guys around him) appeared to find their niche—that is, play as a team and take advantage of what he brings, rather than rely on him to carry the team.

by elesias on Mar 11, 2010 1:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Well said, Eles. Just cause he didn’t rack up any points, doesn’t mean he didn’t contribute. I thought this was a great team win: 6 different scorers, points from the D, and a 60-min effort. Despite a couple breakdowns, they didn’t get down on themselves, and pulled out a solid win. It wasn’t their best game ever, but it was a big step in the right direction.

If Andrew Peters ever plays again it will be too soon.

by LangsForPres on Mar 11, 2010 2:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Agree on Leblond over Peters

I have seen absolutely no reason whatsoever that Andrew Peters should be in the NHL.

by Devilssection21fan on Mar 11, 2010 3:24 PM EST up reply actions  

hopefully that was the end of the year slump we got the last few years

and now its over.i can rember devils teams with the same coach they have now being very strong in the last 15 games.im still not really sure what is gonna happen when the playoffs start but i do think the devils from the begining of the season have returned to finish strong unlike the last few seasons.

by Imperator_Celtic on Mar 11, 2010 2:23 PM EST reply actions  

Rags fans at the game

Great game to be at, my voice is screwed up today.

Perhaps this is a bit off topic, but I happened to read through in the game thread last night and saw mention that someone thought it was 50/50 split in fans.

Now, there were WAY too many blue jerseys in the crowd. But it was nowehere near 50/50. I would say maybe 25% Rangers fans, if that. Even early on before the outcome was clear, any time the Rangers fans tried to get any kind of chant going they were quickly drowned out.

Maybe it is not relevant, but I dislike the Rangers so much that I could not let anyone have the impression that they were in force as much as Devils fans.

by Devilssection21fan on Mar 11, 2010 3:30 PM EST reply actions  

I think what you saw live confirms what I saw on TV, devilssection. I remember somebody claiming that it was 50/50 in the game thread as well, but it definitely looked like there was a lot more Devil’s fans than just 50% based on the camera panning the crowd after a goal. Granted that might be decieving considering they were standing up, but 75% seems accurate. I’m pleased to know that we had a bigger crowd and hope this continues.

"We aim above the mark to hit the mark." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson

by Tim G on Mar 11, 2010 5:46 PM EST up reply actions  

I was at the game too and I would agree that the crowd was closer to 25/75 in favor of Devils fans. It was an awesome game to be at. We won, so that’s not hard to believe, but we also never were trailing so it is always easier to be in good spirits at a game.

Ha! hope your voice feels better Devssec21fan.

 My voice is hurting too. Also have to say that the fans in 232 are very knowledgeable about all the different chants as well as all the inventive profanities ;-) Hilarious time, but maybe John should add a section to the fan guide about sitting in 232 and how it is R-rated for “harsh language” I’m saying this because I saw parents with two 10 year olds and the parents were just grinding their teeth with every profanity. Still a good time. Not complaining. Section 232 lived up to the billing and supported our team die-hard!

...and it's 6 - 3, New Jersey!!!

by Devil_Hard_Core on Mar 11, 2010 10:57 PM EST up reply actions  

my thoughts on the game.

First of all I think the defense played well. Sure there was a couple of breakdowns but that happens in every game no team is perfect for 60 minutes. Fraser is still growing as a defenseman and he will make mistakes. I think where the game was won was the overall aggression of the offense and the defensemen getting more involved in the scoring. The best players on the ice last night were Niedemayer,Rolston, and Langenbrunner, I noticed Pandolfo was not out there last night. The Devils were also getting closer to the net and getting in front a lot more often. And of course the home cooking helped. I still do not think Marty is all the way back yet. He has played better the last 2 games but I would like to see him get a shutout and I will think that the old Brodeur is back. Hopefully Pittsburgh will be the one he does it against. Pittsburgh seems to get frustrated by our style. I am more worried about the Capitals right now.

Donald Vasquez

by don_vas on Mar 11, 2010 5:29 PM EST reply actions  

You need a shutout?

Really?

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Mar 11, 2010 7:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I would like to see a shutout.

I do not need a shutout a victory would do just fine. I would like to see a shutout because when Marty is on his game he shuts out a lot of teams.

Donald Vasquez

by don_vas on Mar 11, 2010 9:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Did you notice how Fraser wasn’t on the ice after that give away that lead to a ranger goal? I felt bad for him but understand the coach’s call on that too.

...and it's 6 - 3, New Jersey!!!

by Devil_Hard_Core on Mar 11, 2010 10:59 PM EST up reply actions  

ooops,posted before I finished

I agree that we simply took it to them and played like we are the better team and that should be our focus from here out because I believe in this team and a I honestly feel we could do to any team what we just did to the Rangers.

by eppy on Mar 11, 2010 7:16 PM EST reply actions  

No, No, I didn’t complete my post ,I agreed in the sense that we took it to them as I thought I rectified in the latter post.

by eppy on Mar 11, 2010 8:37 PM EST reply actions  

Blueshirt Banter

Again probably a bit off topic, but if you want to have a little fun, check out the Blueshirt Banter page and their thread after their loss to the Devils. They are just losing their minds over there. I suppose it is a bit sick, but I did enjoy the dismay of the fans of our hated rivals. They actually have fans arguing they should trade away Lundqvist.

I love the smell of burnt Ranger fans in the morning.

by Devilssection21fan on Mar 12, 2010 7:32 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the New Jersey Devils! New here? Check out the Rules and Guidelines before posting.
joomla visitors

Managers

Stanley_cup_and_you_-_sbn_small John Fischer

Authors

Puddy_small Tom Stivali

Marty_sbetter_small Matthew Ventolo

Trollvalchuk_small Kevin Sellathamby

Rex_ryan--300x300_small Josh Weinstein

1729_small Matt Evans SNC