New Jersey Devils Finally Win Two in a Row; Defeat Pittsburgh Penguins 3-1
Back on January 12, 2010, the New Jersey Devils picked up a 1-0 shootout win over the New York Rangers. The win was after their last official game on January 9, a 2-1 overtime win against the Montreal Canadiens. Since January 12, the Devils have not won two games in a row. Until tonight.
Tonight, the New Jersey Devils beat the Pittsburgh Penguins 3-1. The Devils handed the Pittsburgh Penguins their first loss in regulation since February 6, 2010. This win comes after a 6-3 win over Our Hated Rivals on Wednesday. It's been two long months, but they finally won two games in a row. Perhaps this is a sign - finally, a sign - that the Devils may have turned the corner.
What struck me the most about this game was how it was reminiscent of a playoff game. Yes, it was only a regular season game, but both teams really let everything fly. Emotions flared. Intensity went up and down the rink. The crowd was into it from minute #1 right until minute #60. Players who tried to take liberties with others got squashed by their teammates. There were hits, ill-advised penalties, and even Jamie Langenbrunner running Chris Kunitz into his own bench after Kunitz tried to start something with Ilya Kovalchuk. Skaters had chances, goaltenders played very well to deny them most of those chances, and ultimately the Devils got the benefit of the breaks and kept Pittsburgh down.
Was it the most perfect game by the Devils? No. Like Wednesday's game, there is plenty to criticize. But was it a performance filled with heart and tenacity? You bet. I can say that it's not just two wins in a row, but two at-least-decent performances by the team. NHL.com has their recap up complete with the official stats for the game. Over at PensBurgh, new writer JustinM isn't pleased with how the game was called nor how the Penguins performed. I don't know if I agree that Evgeni Malkin didn't really show up to play - he had 4 shots and tried to fight Rob Niedermayer at one point (I think it was Niedermayer at least). Though, he wasn't much of a factor. Read on after the jump for my further thoughts on the game.
First, check out the highlights to the game with this video from NHL.com:
Let's address what I'm sure will be a controversy over the next day: the Ilya Kovalchuk goal. The goal was the third one in the game and as it turned out, it had no bearing on the final result. It didn't kill off Pittsburgh's chances, but they never answered Andy Greene's second goal to make it anymore than an insurance goal. Per the video, it appears to me that Travis Zajac might have clipped Marc-Andre Fleury's glove prior to Kovalchuk's shot. The shot beat Fleury glove side; therefore, it must have been interference, right? Well, I've watched the goal itself on video over and over and I'm completely convinced that Zajac got enough on Fleury's glove to make a difference. The Penguins commentators certainly weren't.
But who cares about my opinion or the opinion of the Penguins' commentators? According to Tom Gulitti's post here, Zajac did admit that he did get a piece of his glove. By that admission, the Penguins and their fans have a legitimate complaint. Still, it doesn't matter as user FrankG29 pointed out in the GameThread, Rule 69.1 states clearly that goalie interference can't be reviewed by tape. So it's not like the goal was going to be discounted. And again, the goal didn't mean much in the game.
So I feel bad for the Penguins fans in that regard who feel they were wronged, but I feel the most badly for Marc-Andre Fleury. He played as well as you could have expected tonight and what beat him? A rebound goal by Patrik Elias, who no Penguin picked up on him. A rebound goal by Andy Greene that was such a piledriver of a shot, I don't think he could recreate that shot if you gave him a 100 chances. Again, he was left open on the flank. And then on the Kovalchuk goal, Ilya kept the puck in play, turned, and fired it perfectly - Zajac interference or not. Not exactly shots you could fully fault Fleury on and I don't think you should. He robbed the Devils numerous times, especially in the second period where turned away all 19 shots including a penalty shot. Fleury showed up for this one and ended up with three against.
However, the better goaltender tonight was truly Mr. Martin Brodeur. The only goal he gave up was soft, a five-hole concession to Mr. Sidney Crosby. Yet from then on, Brodeur was on fire. Gloves saves, pad saves, stick saves, cross-crease saves, all kinds of saves. Did he benefit from some poor finishing by the Penguins? Sure. Did he get lucky on a few of those loose pucks in traffic? Probably. All the same, he came up big when the Penguins offense exerted their muscle - especially in the third period with 15 shots on net. I'm not killing the Devils' defense because they played as well as they could, it was mostly Pittsburgh forcing the plays to happen, but Brodeur wasn't having it. There were spontaneously loud chants near the end of the third of "Marty!" and "Marty's Better" because he truly excelled tonight.
Going back to criticism, what didn't excel was the power play for either team. Yes, both goalies had something to do with it; but each team just struggled to set something up most of the time. The Penguins giftwrapped most of the power plays for the Devils, most notably the dangerous and utterly stupid (it was after a whistle!) late hit from behind by Craig Adams on Martin Skoula that led to a major and a game misconduct and Mike Rupp's slash on Martin Brodeur after he covered the puck. 7 minutes of power play time and the Devils did very little with it.
Overall, the Devils did manage to put 8 shots on net on their 4 power plays; yet I'm more concerned with the lack of consistent offensive pressure on those power plays. It's one thing to not score on them, but it's another if the other team keeps clearing pucks over and over. That's why the fans were understandably unhappy with the 5 minute power play; it was a chance to really put the screws to the Penguins and at 1-1 and they didn't even take it.
The only positive I can find in that is that the Devils didn't sulk after not converting on those power plays. In fact, they played better after them. That shows a lot of character. Yet, I think we all would like to see a more threatening power play.
The same could be said for Pittsburgh's power play, truth be told. Their best power play came late in the third period and Jordan Staal nearly converted only to be robbed by, guess who, Martin Brodeur. Yet, they only mustered 5 shots in total and the Devils killed their other 4 power plays with ease. Both teams wasted chances, really.
But the Devils were more egregious in wasting their chances. Penguins fans can point to Brodeur for being the big reason for not scoring on what would otherwise be great chances to score. The Devils go out and put 19 shots on Fleury in the second period, have multiple power plays, even draw a penalty shot after Fleury stops a breakaway and at the end of it all - it was a scoreless period. Honestly, I was worried that the Devils would pay the price. That the Penguins escaping the period at 1-1 would lead them to rise up in the third period.
Of course, that didn't happen. Bizarrely, I think Pittsburgh's approach to try and intimidate the Devils backfired as the team really came together and put out strong efforts. I'm not saying that all that the Devils did physically was smart; but they came out stronger instead of thrown off their game. As a result, there's a lot of praise to be had: Ilya Kovalchuk was backchecking a little late in the game and then race down ice to keep a puck from being called for icing to burn off more time. The third line didn't pick up any points, but they looked strong around the boards all night long - helping wear down the Penguins' defense. Rod Pelley and Dean McAmmond were getting shifts late in the third period. In fact, McAmmond was the best Devil at the dot, going 7-for-8 as the only center to do better than 50%.
Brodeur was doing the best he could and it was massive; but the defense wasn't invisible despite allowing 35 shots on net. Mike Mottau (4 blocks!) and Andy Greene (4 hits!) had some of their best games in their own zone in a while; they both played big along the boards and smart in space. Greene especially stuck out with 3 shots on net, 5 that missed, 1 of those misses turning into Elias' goal and 1 of those shots being an absolute beauty. I will also say that Crosby and Malkin, while contributed to the game, didn't do a whole lot meaningful after Crosby's early goal. That's a big compliment for the defense given what those two are capable of on the ice.
Of them all, I'd have to say I was most impressed with Kovalchuk. I mean, he didn't start off the game all that great. On the Devils' first power play, he tried to passa puck to Brian Rolston at the blueline that got picked off by a Pen and he had to chase him down to prevent a breakaway (which he did to his credit). He didn't score on a breakaway, drew a penalty shot from it (thanks, Kris Letang), and didn't convert on that either. He didn't look good on the power play in the second period. Did it bother him? It certainly didn't look like it on the ice. His speed picked up, his desire became more apparent, and he played like a monster in the third period. He finished the game with a goal, two assists (he set up Greene for his miss; his shot led to the rebound Greene scored on), and 7 shots on net. The Devils may have only put 5 shots on net in the third, but Kovalchuk was a big factor in keeping the Pens honest in their own end as they scrambled to answer New Jersey's goals.
Do the Devils need to improve on their power play? Sure. Were they fortunate that Brodeur played out of his mind at times? As much as the Penguins benefited from the strong play of Fleury, I'd say. Still, the performance did have a lot of positives; they shut the door on a top team on their own ice even after a second period where they didn't make the most of their chances. Now, they are 5-0 against the Pittsburgh Penguins and only two points behind them with two games in hand in the Atlantic. More importantly than that, they earned two deserved wins in a row. Devils fans should be happy with the final score.
Can they rest? Of course not. The Devils need to be especially careful that this game doesn't lead to a letdown on Long Island tomorrow. If they can put up a good performance tomorrow, pick up a win on the road, then the Devils would make big strides towards putting their slump to rest.
Thanks for reading. Thanks to Steve for the GameThread. Please leave all your thoughts, feelings, complaints, and criticisms in the comments. But again, let's not get cocky, the Islanders await on Saturday.
0 recs |
21 comments
|
Comments
Very fun game to watch. Hopefully they can bring that intensity tomorrow. Some quick thoughts from me.
I really liked how Pelley has been playing.
Martin Skoula had a solid game, he made some good defensive plays in the 3rd
I hate Matt Cooke. The way he complained about getting hit the head was pathetic. I wish he would have fought someone that could actually fight.
Does anyone have a link to the Langenbrunner hit?
I didn’t see it in the highlights.
Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.
When there's a WILL there's a WAY
I missed a great game
Yeah – working tonight, so I missed it. But perhaps John I think you are being too conciliatory on the Kovy goal. If Zajac touched Fleury, it was clear that it was outside of the crease area. Now I know goalies aren’t “fair game” there, but it is clear that Zajac was going for the tip and not Fleury’s glove. To me, it is as if Fleury’s glove interfered with Zajac. Especially, when you look at where it took place.
I have respect for most sports fans with 2 exceptions: NY Ranger fans who grew up in New Jersey, and Dallas Cowboy fans who can't name the capital of Texas.
agreed
I think it’s actually a grayer area than Travis might get credit for. Rule 69 makes specific reference in a couple places to “intentional or deliberate” contact – it’s clear Zajac was looking to deflect the puck rather than interfere with Fleury’s glove and the contact, though perfectly timed, was light enough that it’d fall within the “incidental” category under any other circumstances. It’s a nuanced interpretation of the rule, but I think the ref made the right non-call.
That said, if it’d happened on the other end to Marty, we’d all be screaming about it, so I don’t blame Pens fans for being mad.
I was really hoping that the Penguins didn’t score so that that 3rd goal didn’t become the GWG, because then it might have been an issue. As was pointed out, it didn’t change the game in the slightest. The Penguins were still down by a goal and so that third one didn’t change how they had to approach the game, so any anger about after the fact is misplaced.
Kovy and the Devils/Defense
I have been harshly critical of our D of late but I have aknowledge a great game not just by Greene but I thought all the D men. What did people think of Skoula? I thought he had a pretty good game myself. I will say that the D will have to play at that level very consistently for us to make a deep run, which means Greene will be key. He has to continue to try and contribute offensively—-with Martin (if that happens) by his side we may be able to muster enough offense out of the D down the stretch.
Probably most important for this game, I thought Kovalchuck really felt like a Devil for the first time and perhaps (from a psychological and emotional perspective) saw himself happy as a Devil for some time to come. Of course no one can get inside the guys head, but I thought that the team really came together tonight with Kovalchuck for the first time. There was ofcourse the toronto win and the Nashville win ( i think) but this time it was a true team triumph with Kovy working together with everyone.
Another note, I also like Pelley’s play. Thought he had a couple good shots on goal and played with good energy.
The Pens Blog . . .
I have to say, the Pens blog has the most vitriolic haters per constituent poster of any of the hockey blogs you link to. Devils are boring. Marty’s overworked. Dump and chase. Officials have been bribed for NJ Transit monthly passes. Etc.
The Capitals blog gives them a run for their money, which is why it’s always so amusing in a childish, point-and-laugh kind of way whenever they play each other… but yeah. I used to go to both of those sites pretty regularly for news and different perspectives on stories and events, but now, not so much.
The interesting and telling part of it is how the fans are so busy lambasting the refs for the 5 minute major on Adams and the “controversy” on the 3rd, and ultimately meaningless, goal, that they casually overlook, and by extension, dismiss as acceptable, Rupp’s late stab on Marty or Kunitzes’ behavior on Kovalchuk and then dragging Langenbrunner through the Penguins’ bench area by his neck… and Jamie somehow getting the extra penalty. Make-up call? You betcha.
That’s my issue with refereeing in this league, personally. That if one team is committing multitudinous infractions, and taking penalties but continuing to commit them, the refs will not only not call all but the absolute most egregious of them, but will actually look to call ones on the other team to “even things out”. That situation with Jamie and Kunitz on the bench is a good example of that… at the worst, that should have been coincidental minors.
Wow. Not surprised at all. Pen Fans are so use to being told there team is the jewel of the NHL. Then when a team actually shows they are a threat. One that does not play there style. Suddenly that team is boring, only dumps and chase and over working marty? referess are being bribed? Silly Pen Fans.Dont get made at us that Crosby cant dive like he use too.
by Devilman3030 on Mar 13, 2010 10:28 AM EST up reply actions
I have to agree
I was reading their game thread after the game, and a lot of it just looked silly.
Although I was reading ours after the game too, and a lot of people seemed silly here too, but not to the extent of them.
Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.
When there's a WILL there's a WAY
caps fans are new to the sport
and have learned how to act from penguin fans cause of there rivalry its a real shame.as for the pen fans complaining it comes from there brodcast,acording to there comentary team the penguins have never deserved to lose a game.
by Imperator_Celtic on Mar 13, 2010 1:09 PM EST up reply actions
I wouldn't put much stock into reading GameThreads
1) Some people ONLY post in GameThreads and they aren’t at all indicative of the community at large.
2) I’m trying to remember if there’s a phrase about throwing stones in glass houses.
C) I wouldn’t be so concerned about what others say. If they’re haters, let them hate. To quote a Hall & Oates box set: Do what you want, be who you are. The outside commentary doesn’t matter.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Mar 13, 2010 2:45 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah that's true
And fyi, it’s
Number A)
Letter 2)
and
Roman Numeral IV)
No C’s
/jk
Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.
When there's a WILL there's a WAY
Wow... Pens fans are D-bags...
I never felt much of a strong rivalry with the Pens, but if this is what they sound like, I think I’m going to put them right up there with Rangers and Philly Fans. What a sore loser! What pompous sense of entitlement!
I love how he said Marty looked over worked after his ridiculous play shut them down. I also like how he blames the penalties on the trap somehow, and not Pittsburgh’s dirty plays. (PS, we didnt start using the trap until we were up by 2 in the Third.
A very hard fought and playoff-like game was won by the New Jersey Devils last night. What a sensational and old school game by Martin Brodeur; he always seems to rise to the occasion against the Penguins. He looked about five years younger and back in his prime last night. I would say this is the best he has looked since…probably the last time we played against the Penguins. It was wonderful to see and I think the fans really fed off of Brodeur and the energy he created last night.
I won’t comment too much in regards to Penguins fans calling the Devils play “boring” last night because it was anything but that. And for those claiming that the Devils used the trap to slow down the game 1)are wrong 2) probably don’t even know what the trap was. That style of play has been all but eradicated with the post-lockout NHL.
Regardless, I thought this was an excellent game to watch. Andy Greene stepped up big time with the game winning goal (what a shot!), but he really played well throughout the entire game. This is exactly what the New Jersey Devils will need in order to be an elite team in the league: defensemen like Greene and others stepping up and helping to initiate within the offense, throwing in that 2nd assist that creates a goal. Throughout the last two games, the Devil’s defensemen have stepped up big time.
Hats off to Niedermayer for wanting to fight. Keyword here being “wanted” because he was thrown on his butt in about five seconds. But hey, I give the man credit for his enthiusiasm.
"We aim above the mark to hit the mark." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Just wanted to throw in there that I had the esteem pleasure of reading JustinM’s recap of the game from the perspective of JustiM.
1) “settled into the sort of familiar dump and chase exhibition one gets when taking in a Devils game” otherwise known as getting the puck in the zone and creating opportunities? I’m pretty sure every team in the NHL does this. If they don’t, they’re probably not very good.
2)" However, the Devils’ mediocre power play wasn’t even able to get anything started in those five minutes," (regarding the five minute major in the 2nd) If I am correct, the Penguins power play hasn’t been more than mediocre all season either. I think recently they have done better, but overall…I doubt they are that much different in terms of effectiveness, particularly against one another this season. Thanks for the compliment though.
3)“The refs decided to swallow their whistles” (Regarding Zajac’s goal) actually thats not the refs faults, but the fault of the league itself for making up a dumb rule. Either way, the penguins didn’t score another goal anyway so that wasn’t the game winner.
4)“Martin Brodeur looked like his typical overworked self” Actually he will be the first to tell you he hasn’t been overworked of late. Remember, he only played one game during the Olympics, so he essentially had those two weeks off. Since then, he has played what, five games? I think he’s fine. He seemed to have plenty of energy last night. That Crosby goal wasn’t a great one but considering the outcome, I’m willing to let that one slide.
5)“This is the sort of thing that happens when you take a ton of penalties against a team that plays the trap.” The Devil’s don’t play the trap. It’s called being a good defensive team. In fact, I believe we have the second lowest GAA in the league right now. Thanks for the pseudo-insult though.
6) “This game started like a barnburner with two goals in the first two and a half minutes, one from Patrik Elias off of very springy end boards” I told the guys to fix those boards after the game last night. sorry about that.
"We aim above the mark to hit the mark." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Why didn’t you just respond to his post then?
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Mar 14, 2010 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions

by 



















