Looking Closer at the New Jersey Devils' Power Play Issues
Last night, the New Jersey Devils were down 3-1 going into the third period against the New York Islanders. A laser of a slapshot by Ilya Kovalchuk pulled the Devils within one early in the third period and the attack was on. Dwayne Roloson was bombarded with rubber as the Devils did whatever they could to get the equalizer. Dylan Reese of the Islanders high-sticked Zach Parise in the face and drew blood, giving the Devils a four minute power play. Normally, this is a gift for the team down by one.
But the Devils not only squandered the opportunity, but surrendered a goal against that undercut the comeback effort. Sure, Blake Comeau tacked on a minor with 50 seconds left to leave a short 5-on-3 and an abbreviated 5-on-4, but again, the Devils didn't do much with. Of the 21 shots the Devils had in the third period, about 4 of them came on the power play that lasted over 5 minutes in that same period.
That's a problem. And it's not a new one. On Wednesday, the Devils' offense showed up, made Marc-Andre Fleury of the Pittsburgh Penguins work all night long, and scored 3 goals. Yet, when Craig Adams took a 5 minute major penalty for a hit from behind on Martin Skoula; the Devils' offense shrunk out there and only put a few shots on net. A later power play in the second period looked a little better but yielded later.
The power play for the New Jersey Devils has been frustrating to watch, considering the personnel involved. With another week of four games, surely, power play opportunities will come up for New Jersey. Let's discuss what the problems are in more detail in the hopes of finding some root cause to their power play struggles.
The Current Power Play Situation
Let's focus on the last 6 games, the ones after the Olympic break. Here's how the Devils have done on the power play in each of those games:
3/2 at San Jose: 1-for-3 (4:06); 5 shots on net; PPG scored by Ilya Kovalchuk, assisted by Zach Parise, Travis Zajac; Other Devils on Ice: Andy Greene, Jamie Langenbrunner
3/5 at Calgary: 1-for-4 (5:27); 5 shots on net, PPG scored by Zach Parise; assisted by Jamie Langenbrunner, Travis Zajac; Other Devils on Ice: Brian Rolston, Ilya Kovalchuk
3/8 at Edmonton: 0-for-1 (2:00), 0 shots on net
3/10 vs NY Rangers: 1-for-2 (2:15), 3 shots on net; PPG scored by Zach Parise, assisted by Dainius Zubrus, Travis Zajac; Other Devils on Ice: Brian Rolston, Ilya Kovalchuk
3/12 vs Pittsburgh: 0-for-4 (9:20), 8 shots on net
3/13 at NY Islanders: 0-for-4 (7:11), 5 shots on net
That's a total of 18 power play opportunities, 3 were converted for goals, and 23 shots were put on net. All three goals involved the Devils putting at least 4 forwards on the ice, with Parise, Zajac, and Kovalchuk all present. In fact, Parise has scored two of them off rebounds with the only other one being Kovalchuk's wrist shot from the point.
Generally, most teams will use the power play to set up an excellent shot as opposed to what they would normally do on even strength situations. With the opposition short a defender, this is desirable and understandable. So bombing pucks away just isn't a smart option. This can include, but is not limited to, cross-ice passes for one-timers, clogging the slot to open up the shot at the point, and just jamming the puck in deep. Nevertheless, the team has averaged 1.278 shots per power play. It's clear that not only are they not scoring power play goals, but they aren't setting up enough good shots regardless of how well they have performed offensively in 5-on-5 hockey.
In general, Lemaire tends to throw Kovalchuk usually at the point, either ZZ Pops (Parise-Zajac-Langenbrunner) or ZZZ (Parise-Zajac-Zubrus), and either Brian Rolston or Andy Greene at the point on the first unit. Especially on special situations like a 5-on-3 or a power play longer than two minutes, Lemaire will put out five forwards. Kovalchuk tends to stay on throughout the power play when other forwards come in to spell the initial unit.
Per Tom Gulitti's comment in this post at Fire & Ice (discussing the power play, incidentally), the Devils practice the power play regularly. They even worked on it today. The issue isn't that they have neglected it in practice - that can be eliminated. As reported here by Gulitti, Jacques Lemaire is concerned about the unit, just as much as we are as observers:
"We have to work at it to see the options that we have," Lemaire said. "See when it’s time to shoot, when to pass, what’s available, what’s not."
Lemaire conceded the power play is the team’s biggest problem right now.
"We’re losing games because of this," he said. "At least if you don’t score, you cannot give up a goal."
Lemaire said he would "probably" continue using five forwards at times on 5-on-4 power plays. He had Ilya Kovalchuk and Brian Rolston on the points again during today’s practice.
Now, I don't agree that the power play has led to a loss, but it certainly hasn't helped New Jersey a lot as of late.
Tactical Issues & Suggestions
What troubles me is that Lemaire says that he'll continue to use 5 forwards on the power play. With what was seen in the last two games, I really don't think this is a good idea. For one thing, it basically puts all of the Devils' offensive talent into one basket. On paper, a unit featuring Zach Parise, Ilya Kovalchuk, and Travis Zajac alone should be frightening to play against. Moreso when you add in Jamie Langenbrunner, Brian Rolston, Dainius Zubrus, David Clarkson, or Patrik Elias. Basically, the top forwards on the team.
The good news is that despite the Devils not having a defenseman to run the point, the Devils do have enough forwards who can handle themselves well on the power play. There's Kovalchuk, Parise, Zajac, Elias, Langenbrunner, Zubrus, Clarkson, and Rolston. That's eight forwards, each with differing skill-sets. Surely, two units could be created out of this group? Greene and Anssi Salmela are capable enough on defense to handle a man advantage. When Paul Martin returns, that's another defenseman available. The point is that the Devils aren't short on personnel.
However, it's not clear what the plan is to utilize all of them. Kovalchuk and Rolston have excellent slapshots, so do the Devils employ an umbrella strategy? Zubrus, Clarkson, Langenbrunner, Zajac, and Parise are excellent down low, so do they try to overload the slot and just crash the crease? Elias, Kovalchuk, Langenbrunner, and Zajac have good vision and can set up good passes (Elias being the best at it), so do they just set along the side boards to look for passing lanes?
To me, this leads to two major issues: it is not clear who should be on what unit and the Devils don't have a specific approach to their power play.
I feel that the two issues go hand-in-hand. For one chance, we can see Parise-Zajac-Zubrus-Kovalchuk-Rolston and on the next power play it could be Parise-Zajac-Langenbrunner-Kovalchuk-Greene. Granted, I understand fatigue and individual performance (e.g. if Zubrus is having a great game, give him more minutes) plays a role, but I think it's undercutting what the Devils are doing.
We can immediately ask questions about the power play right from the get-go. For example: If Rolston and Kovalchuk are on the point, then who's the primary target at the point? Who's leading the breakout to get into the zone? Are they dumping and chasing or is one man going to carry it over the line, draw attention, and dish it off to someone else? Will there be Devils trying to set up screens or play off the slot for rebounds? I don't know, you don't know, and the answers (and the questions) by the team change from power play to power play, game to game. Because the units change by one or two people, it changes the approach and so an aggressive penalty kill can just stand at the blueline and be prepared for the rush up ice - figuring out what the Devils are doing and reacting faster than the Devils can employ their tactic.
On the Devils' side, this all leads to just struggling to get into any kind of rhythm among their power play units. This puts Lemaire in a tough spot - if something doesn't work, generally you make a change. At the same time, too many changes lead to the situation where the Devils are. Despite all the talent at forward, there isn't much in sync because it isn't clear what they're trying to do each time. Therefore, there's a team with the talent to put together a great power play on paper, but when opportunities arrive, our expectations are dashed by the team struggling to set up shots, much less score goals. Those are man advantages wasted, fans and a team frustrated, and momentum handed right back to the other team.
I don't believe the Devils are going to be able to be consistently threatening on a power play, much less score more goals, until roles are defined and a plan is set. If this means an umbrella plan where Kovalchuk bombs away and the forwards try to pick up the loose puck, then fine. If this means an overload strategy where ZZ Pops can cycle down low to open up passing and shooting lanes, then fine. But right now, I couldn't tell you what the Devils try to do on the power play given what they've done all season. The answer to that is simple: define units, set a plan, try it out, and then make adjustments accordingly.
The lack of a power play identity becomes a larger problem during a longer power play, where giving the first unit a long shift undercuts the second's ability to set something up. This tires out the first group so they have to rest longer and the second unit is some mish-mash of other players available trying to pick up where the first unit went wrong. An additional problem is that Kovalchuk has been seen on the ice throughout entire power plays. He's a fantastic offensive talent, he has many skills, but I don't feel he's being used to his fullest by giving him the long shifts on man advantages. It's one thing to tell him to run the point, but the Devils have multiple players who can do a decent enough job for the second unit - if only just to keep the puck in the zone and distribute the puck. He shouldn't have to play on both units with the number of players available. Yet, he does.
So what can be done? Again, Lemaire needs to clearly define who is on both power play units, what their roles are, and how they will conduct themselves going into the offensive zone and how they will set themselves up. I personally don't have any preference as to how they are set up except that I don't think there should be any more 5 forward units. I feel it's an issue of too many cooks in the kitchen, players' styles clashing with each other in a situation where they should be meshing together. This can be addressed by Lemaire and the coaching staff.
What the players themselves can do, I think, is simpler: relax. It's very weird that the Devils can have 7 minutes of power play time against Pittsburgh, put up maybe 4 or 5 shots on the power play, and then put 14-15 shots in even strength. That tells me that the New Jersey players on the power play tend to get tentative and start feeling the pressure. I don't know what else it could be given a period like that; it was the same way in the third period against the Islanders (4-5 shots on the power play out of 21 total in the period).
The pressure to make the most of the power play, to take full advantage, and it just gets to them, which I think leads to poor passes, poor puck movement into the zone, and indecision to shoot. Again, I don't want the Devils to fire away indiscriminately - that will just lead to lots of shots with no goals either (or a ton of blocked shots). I just want them to stop playing so nervously on the man advantage. Perhaps that alone will lead to at least more consistently threatening power plays.
Once the Devils can do that, the goals will come and what has been an issue for the Devils in 2010 could become a strength. When and how they will do it, I don't know. I would imagine, like most things, it won't happen overnight or just by sheer luck. From my perspective, all we as fans can do is hope they figure that out. I've offered my take, I'm sure you have your own thoughts that you'll kindly place in the comments.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
My take?
I think we need to go back to seeing Clarkie on the first unit in front of the net. Not only does he do a great job of screening, he has excellent hands in front of the net for picking up rebounds and deflecting pucks. I’d like to see 4 forward units out with the primary unit being Clarkson in front of the net to screen, Parise lurking down low for rebounds, Elias as the primary passer, Kovy on one point as the featured shooter and Greene on the other point. That still leaves you with the group of Langenbrunner, Zajac, Zubrus, Rolston, and Salmela for a still fairly strong PP unit, on top of anyone they would double shift with this group. Not to mention this group gets stronger once Martin gets back. Which brings me to my biggest observation on their PP problems, they aren’t getting good entries. No one who has been playing on the point for us on the PP (Rolston, Greene, Kovy, Langs, etc.) is great at getting the puck into the zone, whether it be through passing or skating. I know I’ve said it a million times on here, but I’ll say it again. We really miss Martin’s ability to skate the puck up ice on the breakout and get consistent entries. I know the guy never created a ton of offense on the power play, but he was great at allowing our offense a chance to at least set up, which is more than it has done for the past 3 months.
Good breakdown
John,
Your analysis is so detailed it prevents me from quoting all of your best points. But the one I agree with the most is:
I personally don’t have any preference as to how they are set up except that I don’t think there should be any more 5 forward units. I feel it’s an issue of too many cooks in the kitchen, players’ styles clashing with each other in a situation where they should be meshing together.
Also Mandmeisterx had a decent one too – especially pointing out the rushing defensemen.
What I see is in addition to the lack of a rushing D who gains you that zone, is the the lack of a banger who will win the dumped puck when a rush doesn’t work. Simply putting your best offensive players out there isn’t going to do that . I would only put one or two snipers out there, a rushing D, a banger and a quality set up guy. Who are the Devils’ best setup guys? This is where a Gomez would be big. The passing on the PP has been the biggest culprit as far as I’m concerned. Flubbed passes (a lot of them by Kovy and Rolston) or no brainer cross board attempts through the defending teams’ box setup that Bantams would get scolded for doing. Kovy’s passing leaves a lot to be desired, when a good killer harasses him at the point, he usually flubs the next pass.
My 1st unit would be: Parise-Kovalchuk-Clarkson-Langenbrunner-Greene. You need your 2 best scorers and a guy who will WIN the inevitable dumps in the corners. Parise wins these and so does Clarkson. Clarkie would also provide traffic in front of the net. Kovalchuk can be on his strong wing – he’ll score more goals there. Langs is your best passer and a guy on the point I trust to at least get the puck on the net. He’s got great vision on the ice and will hit the open wing or the net. Rafalski was the best D guy on the PP because he hit the net. Salvador and Rolston miss too much. Those “unenforced errors” prove to be self-zone clears about 50% of the time. Greene is your best D right now and can rush the puck and can act as the defensive safety valve that Kovy can’t be.
The 2nd unit: Zubrus-Zajac-Elias-Rolston-Martin (Salmela) Zubs is your banger and guy who’ll create traffic in front of the net. Zajac and Elias are your go-to guys. Rolston is on the point (but he HAS to hit the net more) and Salmela can rush the puck for now until Martin gets back. If Rolston continues to stink it up on the PP, you can sub Salmela and Martin for him permanently.
I just want the real Partik Elias to stand up . . . I think that’s a big concern.
I have respect for most sports fans with 2 exceptions: NY Ranger fans who grew up in New Jersey, and Dallas Cowboy fans who can't name the capital of Texas.
Disagree with one point
So bombing pucks away just isn’t a smart option.
With the other team down a man, we have a better chance at getting to the rebound. And if the bombs come from either side, the rebound will likely go to the opposite, and the goalie might not have enough time to get there to stop it. I think the Devils try to be too fancy on the power play and not do what’s it called, a “Power” play. Use some power, fire some shots, even if they’re not high percentage. I gotta believe more goals are scored off rebounds and bounces than put straight in. They’re always looking for that high percentage shot, and if it doesn’t come, the PP is wasted.
Go Jets
Go Devils
The only problem with that line of thinking
is that we have guys back there like Rollie that aren’t hitting the net. More often than not, those don’t create scoring chances, and can be easy clears.
by Mandmeisterx on Mar 14, 2010 9:01 PM EDT up reply actions
With the other team down a man, we have a better chance at getting to the rebound. And if the bombs come from either side, the rebound will likely go to the opposite, and the goalie might not have enough time to get there to stop it.
Not necessarily. Most PK units set up like a “box” around the slot so they can collapse inside to get at loose pucks or just create more traffic in front. Sure, the traffic makes it harder for the goalie to see it – just as it does for the shooter to actually get the puck through to the net as it’ll likely hit a leg, a stick, a skate, etc.
The idea that most teams operate is that you WANT a high percentage shot because the other team is down a man. Shots that just don’t happen all that often when they got 5-on-5. The big problem that the Devils (and many other teams who’s PP has struggled, like Pittsburgh) is that they have trouble getting set up for those shots to begin with. Factor in that if the gameplan is to set up a shot from the point (and sometimes it is, sometime it isn’t), then you have the additional traffic to deal with.
Again: I don’t want the Devils to just bomb shots because we’ll be complaining about how they shoot low percentage shots instead of trying to set something up when the got only 4 pinned back in their own zone. It’s a fine line.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Mar 14, 2010 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions
powerplay problems.
As I see it watching the powerplay closely every night the Devils seem to be pressing trying to make the perfect pass. I find myself yelling shoot the puck. Also their passing is too predictable and slow allowing for a lot of blocked shots by the opposition. AS for the solution to this I believe they need to use 4 forwards and 1 defensemen as of right now being Greene. They need a little more luck less off the pipe shots and also more shots could perhaps cause a crazy bounce to a open player like the Elias goal the other night. A unit that can pass the puck more crisply and shoot the puck more often would be the answer who those players might be is still left to be figured out. Also I would not use Kovy for the entire powerplay sorry but that is my opinion.
Donald Vasquez
My Take:
Two things I’d like to see:
Kovy off the point – two SH against with him on the ice in a week puts him back on the wing, IMO.
More tenacity. They score goals even strength because they go to the net and work harder than the other team. They get too fancy when they’re on the PP. Less fancy passing, more Attack, that will cause the chaos and matchup problems that leads to goals.
Agreed, especially about Kovalchuk on the point. I said from the beginning I like him better playing like Elias does at times, floating around the dots and trying to slip into the slot.
Problem with the “more attack” philosophy is that there are too many guys with the bad habit of missing the net whose shots, instead of being frozen for an offensive zone face-off or rebounded into a high traffic area, rather end up riding the boards all the way back to the point where, usually, the team has to regroup to get back on-sides.
Seems to me the biggest problem with the PP is on entering the zone. Once they get in they do pretty well, as far as maintaining pressure. It’s getting in and setting up that seems to be the problem. Too much dumping in and losing the battle or the long stretch pass to a lone guy on the blue-line who is instantly surrounded by 3 defenders for my liking.

by 

















