The New Jersey Devils: March 2010 in Review
In my review of the New Jersey Devils' February, I wrote the following:
Overall, the Devils have won only 8 games since January 8 and they haven't won two consecutive games since January 12. Fans like myself are running out of reasons to hope things will be quickly different for New Jersey. The Devils, like the rest of the NHL, are on a two week break and will place their next game in March. Will it help? Hopefully.
If not, the fans are left justifiably asking about the team's focus and heart that was ever-present in the 2009 part of this season. That directly ties into the team's leadership and coaches. Will there be a change there? Will there be another trade, possibly for a defender? Will the team being finally healthy be enough to get it sorted out? At this point, I think most Devils fans just want some wins more than anything else - as this month was inarguably bad for New Jersey.
We're now at the end of March and unfortunately we only have some of the answers to these questions.
The Devils indeed make one more trade, sending a fifth round pick to Toronto in exchange for Martin Skoula. So far, Skoula has played fairly well. I'll admit he's been more solid than I expected, playing next to Paul Martin of all defensemen. Indeed, Martin finally returned to play this month to make it the first time all season that the Devils have been fully healthy among regulars.
Did the Olympic Break help? For some players it did, but the New Jersey Devils finished March with only a 7-5-3 record. Better than February and the performances were more consistent - well, consistently positive - than January. But that's a very mixed record. The Devils didn't even win half of their games and only picked up 17 out of a possible 30 points. Granted, they still clinched the playoffs in this month and they have a shot at catching Pittsburgh for the Atlantic Division lead. Regardless, one can break down March in a number of ways to find something to feel good about and something that causes serious concern.
The Devils have done well at home in March with a 5-1-2 record; but are still struggling on the road with a 2-4-1 record. The Devils won the first game in all three of their back-to-back sets; but lost the second game in those three sets as well. The Devils scored 5 goals or more in three games; but they got shutout in three games. Against teams currently in the playoffs, the Devils went 5-1-1. Against teams not in the playoffs, they went 2-4-2. Did the Devils finally win two games in a row? Yes, but never three. On special teams, the Devils were wildly successful in killing penalties in March; killing 36 out of 40 (90%). However, the power play went into a 6 game scoreless streak and only two really great games kept the monthly power play success rate at 17% (8 out of 46).
To answer the larger question of whether the Devils have turned themselves around for the better after a horrid February, honestly, I do not know. We've seen the Devils sweep Pittsburgh only to turn around and look poor in losses to the Islanders and the Maple Leafs. We've seen Calgary and Edmonton outplay the Devils after New Jersey held on to win in San Jose. Before you can say that the Devils only get up for better teams, they end the month with bad performances in losses to Philadelphia and Boston - teams the Devils may very well be facing in the postseason.
There's only 6 games remaining and the Devils have clinched the playoffs back on March 27. Where will they be? Will they rise up and play hard in all six of those games? Or will they struggle and concern fans with their confusing ways? Either way, the goal now is simple: get momentum for the playoffs. Because March, especially how it ended, definitely didn't bring it with it's just-above-average record.
March in Review
I feel like the best way to overview this month is break it down by three sections:
The Last West Coast Road Trip
The New Jersey Devils returned to NHL action in San Jose, taking on the then-first-place-in-the West San Jose Sharks. Given that most of the players had off for two weeks and a number of key players on both teams starred at the Olympics, who knew how the first game would turn out. For the Devils, it went exceedingly well at first. They scored the first 4 goals of the game, but struggles returned when the Sharks struck for three quick goals in the third. However, in a stark contrast from January and February, the Devils held on to get a road win over the Sharks.
Yet, the team went downhill in a 5-3 loss to Calgary that saw 5 straight goals scored by Calgary; and then rock bottom against the NHL-last-place Edmonton Oilers in a game where I think Martin Brodeur was the only Devil to show up as the Devils got shutout by the Oilers 2-0. Yes. The Oilers. 2-0. And entirely deserved given how lackluster the team looked. It was like the slump just took a vacation in California.
The Return Home and the Return to Winning
While we discussed the slump itself, the team looked within themselves for answers. Whatever was said at the players-only meeting on Tuesday, March 9, must have worked because the first home game was a big homecoming. Not just for Zach Parise and Jamie Langenbrunner, who got big ovations from the home crowd. It was big because they beat on the New York Rangers in an impressive fashion, 6-3. It was a win, it was over a rival, it was the return of Paul Martin, and it even featured the offense scoring a bucket load of goals. The game was an oasis in the desert of "Meh-and-ugh" that the Devils were trekking through in 2010.
Then the Devils actually built on that win with a decisive 3-1 win over the Pittsburgh Penguins, the first win over the Penguins this month and since early January. Fantastic! But unfortunately, it would not last. The team took a step back the next night in Long Island where a poor second period and an awful shorthanded goal against sank the Devils 4-2. Yet, the loss didn't lead to further problems. They bounced back in their next game, showing that they wouldn't fold. The Devils gave some proof that the slump may be over with a tighter-looking-than-it-was 3-2 win over Boston. Once again, the Devils built on that with an impressive 5-2 win over the Pittsburgh Penguins in front of a full house at the Rock. In my opinion, the best win of the month. 6 wins out of 6 games over Pittsburgh, shutting Sidney Crosby down, 4 straight wins at home, and Devils fans had reason to be real happy.
Then a trip to face the Toronto Maple Leafs brought fans down to earth as the Devils didn't come out strong, Yann Danis playing over his head to keep the game close, and regretting Paul Martin missing an empty net late in regulation as the Leafs won the game in a shootout. Still, 4-1-1 in the last six was nothing to sneeze at. In retrospect, it led to a mixed finish for the Devils in March.
Back Down to Inconsistency
Since that Leafs game, the rest of the month just went in different directions. The Devils managed to have an unofficial throwback night to 1998 where they'd do everything right on the ice but finish their chances, leading to a 1-0 loss to the St. Louis Blues. Concerns were briefly allayed when the power play scored 3 goals and the Devils put a total of 6 goals on Steve Mason of the Columbus Blue Jackets to win 6-3. OK, the Devils got a win over a team they should have beaten and did so in clear-cut fashion. Not bad, right?
Unfortunately, unlike the first game over the Rangers or the first game over the Bruins, the Devils did not earn a second straight win over the Rangers. They didn't do anything particularly bad on the ice; but a late goal forced extra time and the Rangers won in the shootout, 4-3. It's never good to lose to a rival, but they didn't look too bad in doing so.
However, the final three games of the season led to slow starts by the Devils with different results later on. Against the Montreal Canadiens, Martin Brodeur held strong early and the Devils fought back and came out with their first road win since March 2 against San Jose. The Devils won that night 3-2 and clinched a playoff spot. The very next night, the Devils fell flat on their face and the Philadelphia Flyers skated all over them. The Devils lost 5-1 and the only bright spot was that they didn't get shutout. On the final game of the month, the Devils played even worse than in the Philadelphia game in many ways. Martin Brodeur was the only Devil to show up and he alone forced the game to go to overtime. Alas, a bad break found Boston winning with less than 20 seconds left in overtime to win 1-0 and end New Jersey's March on a very sour note.
While the Devils only lost three games via giving up a goal in the final minute of the game, it's still very disappointing. While we can discuss how the Devils and the opposition did from game to game, getting shut out three times is disappointing. However, one can't look at only the bad games. The Devils played some very good games this month, proving that this team is able to do very well and beat anyone in the league. The trouble is that they have yet to figure out how to perform consistently well. Unfortunately, they're running out of time to do it.
At least March was better than January and February. I wish I knew what it will lead to with April coming up.
Devil of the Month
Overall, a number of Devils had a pretty good March. Inconsistent production, perhaps, but good all together. I don't think anyone honestly questions how well Martin Brodeur is, especially not after the last game with Boston where he made sure the Devils got something out of that game. Four Devil forwards finished with at least 10 points in the 15 games in March: Ilya Kovalchuk, Zach Parise, Travis Zajac, and Patrik Elias. Not bad months at all for each of them. Especially while considering Jacques Lemaire has continued to mix and match forwards in order to find the right mix. Unfortunately, he was still experimenting well into March; hopefully, he'll settle on roles in April. At least the defense is set with Paul Martin having had a mostly successful return after an incredibly long time on injured reserve; and Martin Skoula fitting in very well since the trade.
Today, the New Jersey Devils held their players awards in a luncheon. The team MVP was Zach Parise, Andy Greene got the Unsung Hero award for his play in place of Martin, and Mike Mottau was named as the Player's Player. He's also the In Lou We Trust Honorable Mention for Devil of the Month of March 2010.
Devil of the Month Honorable Mention:
I'm sure some of you are flabbergasted. But March has truly featured the resurgence of Mike Mottau. I detailed how well he has played since the beginning of the month up until March 24. Since that post, Mottau has faced quite a bit of work in the following four games. When Mottau was out on the ice on even strength situations, the Devils faced 12, 11, 8, and 15 shots respectively. Yet only in that third game - the 5-1 loss to Philadelphia - did the Mottau and the Devils get lit up for three goals when he was out there. Truly, it was his only bad game this month; which is a far improvement over January and February where he would consistently make terrible errors that would lead to goals against. The Devils' last game of the month - against Boston - saw Mottau being out there for 15 shots against on even strength. But Mottau did very well in ensuring those shots were easily stopped and preventing Boston to getting to rebounds or have a free lane to Brodeur. That's why Lemaire played him 26:27, because Mottau has cut down on his mistakes, contributes to a very good penalty killing unit. He has earned such responsibility. Even his offense was hitting highs, as he picked up 6 of his 16 points this season in March.
Of all of the Devils, I think Mottau benefited the most from the Olympic break as he has been playing great on defense. For this improvement, he deserved honorable mention for Devil of the Month. I felt this Devil was far more worthy of honors for March.
The In Lou We Trust Devil of the Month for March 2010, Ilya Kovalchuk
Back on March 20, I wrote a rather in-depth piece on Kovalchuk's time in New Jersey. I went over how he was performing as well as the various personal and tactical issues surrounding Kovalchuk due to the trade. He was doing pretty good, but not great, as a Devil. Since that piece, Kovalchuk has been great. His production in March shot up as he settled in with the team, his shooting percentage rose to a more expected value of 12.7%, and his skills were paramount on a team that never really had a player quite like him. Looking back on March, he has the most points among all Devils players in March, one of the few top forwards to finish as a plus player, and has done so while playing a lot of minutes.
It's not that Kovalchuk hasn't made mistakes, and from time to time, he may be trying to do to much on the ice. Yet, in every game save for the last one against Boston, Kovalchuk commanded the attention of every one in the game from the opposition to the fans. Only in the last game against Boston was Kovalchuk a non-factor, but that was a game where the entire offense was a non-factor for much of the game. Even in the 5-1 loss to Philadelphia, who got the lone goal for New Jersey? Kovalchuk. In the Calgary and Islander games there Kovalchuk got beaten off the point that led to a shorthanded goal in each of those games, do recall that Kovalchuk managed to score there too. I bring up those games as evidence that his desire to succeed in New Jersey is true.
There's increasing evidence of him fitting in better on the team beyond just production. For example, the 3-1 win over Pittsburgh, who did I see out there in the last minute as Pittsburgh is throwing everything forward? Kovalchuk who was out there to defend - to defend, I kid you not - and succeeding. Or in the 3-2 win over Montreal, where Kovalchuk charged ahead to take the puck back, won it back from the defense in the neutral zone, had the empty net to ice the game but just dished it off for Brian Rolston so he can get his 700th point. A selfless act like that just showed how Kovalchuk is caring about his teammates - another sign of fitting in. And as he fits in, the points are going to continue. As it is, he's already got 20 points in 21 games.
These performances are what you want from a guy like Kovalchuk. His March turned out to be great in retrospect. Again, he didn't score in every game, but he amassed the most points and has played some positive role in each of them except for the last one against Boston. That is why I believe he is the Devil of the Month.
Please leave your thoughts about how March 2010 went for the New Jersey Devils, the Devil of the Month, and anything related to that in the comments.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
82 Game Schedule
This comment doesnt relate particular to the Devils team but to the NHL more generally. I share the frustrations most of have had regarding the inconsistent play of the Devils. But perhaps we focus too much on the Devils. I have long held that the 80plus schedule is just too long. Of course, we all like the games, and the teams all want the 40 home games for revenue purposes, but from the mental and physical standpoint of the teams and players, its just too much. I dont think its possible to go 100 percent all year long. There have to be games where teams just phone it in. I am not saying the Devils or any other team get together and say “ok guys, lets take this one off.” But something like that is often the gaken for granted result of such a long season. Notice the Sharks and the Blackhawks have also had the worse two weeks of the season in March. And the teams that are hot like the Red Wings at this time of year are typically the teams that took the first half of the year off. All sports play more games than they used too. Baseball plays over 160 they used to play 150. Hockey and Basketaball play more than they did in their history as well. I think the problem is more pronounced in the NHL because it lets a lot of teams in the playoffs. So top teams just loose mental focus in the last month of the season because the know their in the playoffs already and are just kind of playing a waiting game to playoffs start. I perrsonally think the quality of play in the NHL would drastically increase during the regular season if they made the regular season at least 10 maybe 20 games less. That will never happen today for financial reasons, but I’m wondering if anyone else thinks some of this inconsistency of the Devils play may be due not anyting in particular about the team, but rather due to the general structure of the league and number of games played.
how so?
NBA and NHL both play too many games (82 each) and both let in too many teams in the playoffs (16 each). No other sports let that percentage of their teams in the post season. NBA basketaball is terribly boring compared to college, mainly because of the shot clock and rules against zone defense. But thats besides my point—-which is regarding the sheer number of games played along with the fact that a team that knows its in the playoffs (the devils) inevitably looses its physical and mental concentration in March/early April.
Who said 16 is too many teams and 82 is too many games?
Teams lose their physical/mental concentration throughout all sports regardless of season length or league size. It’s absolutely rare to play out of your mind like it’s the end of your life through every possible game. The long season for hockey and basketball filters out the team who are good enough when they aren’t playing at a high level (think a mean) from those who aren’t.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Mar 31, 2010 11:58 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m suggesting the ups and downs are devils are endemic to the nature of the season. When you play 82 and your let 8 from each conference in it changes the incentives to play your top game every night. the more teams you let the more the average regular season game is depreciated. yu only have to be in better half of your conference (usually slighly over 500 to be a playoff team).
You said teams just phone it in. There are usually a lot of stories about players taking “games off” in the NBA.
I think there are going to be less intense games during a long season. Where the tempo and effort so to speak is not cranked up a notch. But I do not think players are taking games off in the NHL.
No one is going to convince me that teams that have nothing to play for are playing at full speed ahead every player on the team. No. But I think 82ish games is about right.
I like the unbalanced schedule. But do not like the way the divisions are set up.
I also think the shoot out has to go.
There’s a fundamental difference between the peaks and valleys of a long season and inconsistent play. It may be a subtle difference, but there is a difference.
In my opinion, the length of the season has little to nothing to do with it.
How about number of teams in the playoffs? In a shorter season would Detroit have fallen flat on their face for a whole first half? They had the luxury of doing so because with 82 game season there is plenty of time to make it up. The NHL letting to many teams in invariabily and inevitabally makes the regular season less meaningful. Why win the Presidents Trophy? San Jose last year are a remarkebly better season than Anaheim last year, one could argue they shouldnt have had to even beat a team like anaheim after winning the presidents trophy. Its nice to give the playoff experience to half the league every year, but with every team you let in the playoffs, the value and importance of your regular season games decline. Once of the NHL’s problems in terms of branching out their fan base is that their product in say mid January, is just not very enteraining. For us hardcore fans its great, we love our team, but even we will admit there are a lot of choppy, neutral ice, boring back and forth games in the regular season. And there is even more of that across the league in places where there arent as many rivalries as there are in our division. Contrast that with Baseball which lets half the teams the NHL does in the playoffs. The downside is that a lot of teams dont get the playoff experience, the upside is makes the regular season very important.
I’ve no problem with the number of teams that make it through. A team has to win three rounds to determine the conference representative in the Finals. That’s not a ridiculous amount, it’s comparable to the other major sports.
Who can say what would have happened to Detroit in a shorter season? They may not have suffered the same injuries that crippled them throughout much of the 82 game season. Or, they might have suffered more trying to accomplish more in less time. I prefer to avoid “what if” discussions like that because once you start changing variables in past events, you alter the outcome in ways you can only speculate… and speculation like that can be argued from any angle until you’re blue in the face without being able to be proven right or wrong.
“Why win the President’s Trophy” is like asking “Why win the Rocket Richard Trophy?” Because it’s there? It doesn’t mean anything in a grand scale, and it doesn’t guarantee post-season success, but it does mean you’ve got home ice throughout the playoffs (which is the true goal of those chasing the trophy). No team sets out at the beginning of the year to win it, but once the season wears on and it becomes an option, it’s a measuring stick and a nice bauble to add to the trophy case.
If San Jose was truly the better team, they had 7 games to prove it, President’s Trophy or not. A bazillion point season or not. Like the Devils last season. They were a better team with a better record than Carolina and should have, by all rights, won that series. Even after all the bad bounces against them throughout the series, they had a golden opportunity to close it out in game 6, but decided not to show up. So who really was the better team?
The teams play the regular season for seeding, but the seeding doesn’t guarantee anything. It just gives a slight advantage (just how much is debatable, and probably different to each team), but arguing that it means nothing so the regular season should be shorter is a slippery slope. By that logic, why not just play 2 games for seeding? Or just flip coins and go right to the playoffs?
To the rest, I’d argue that even the NFL, with the shortest regular season (in terms of games played, with 16) has boring, un-entertaining games and mid-season lulls. And that is even more frustrating to watch because you have to wait a whole week to watch your team, and if they play a stinker, you’ve got a whole week to wonder if they’ll recover.
I think it’s more human nature than anything. The theory would go something like:
When given a period of time to accomplish something, the average person will use all available time to accomplish it, even if it’s more time than should be required.
Off the top of my head, additional bonuses to longer seasons are: more numerous run-ins with rivals, stoking the fires of both fans and players, leading to better games through raised levels of play, chippiness, and better crowd atmosphere; the ability to overcome adversity, like injuries, so that a good team with good players isn’t unfairly penalized because their star player broke his leg or something; longer seasons mean more income for teams, which allow them to pay players well (salaries being a different discussion for a different time) so that start-up leagues like the KHL can’t poach top tier players with the lure of a ginormous paycheck as easily.
Don’t get me wrong. I’m not afraid of change and if a good enough argument were presented to change things, I might change my opinion… but if your argument rests on the fact that teams have lulls so the season is too long, then I’m going to have to disagree.
my points is not about ups and downs. that is going to happen. my point is about the incentive all teams have to play their best game each night. My point, which is simply logical/mathematical one is that the more teams you let in the playoffs, the less incentive there is to play your best game each night, which is why the NHL has so many frankly boring games and games where you go “wow, is that really the devils” during the course of the year. Just think about it: every time wants to get in the playoffs for an opportunity to win the CUP. That is the goal and the incentive to play well during the regular season. Now, the more teams you let in, the less incentive to play well every night because the more teams in means a more mediocore record gets you to your goal of the playoffs. right now you have to be about a few games over 500 to make the playoffs, meaning teams only need to have a slighly better than average season to reach the goal. To see what i mean just think about the incentive to play well if you expanded the number of teams even more that make the playoffs. Logically you would eventually get to the point where if you let in ALL the teams there would literally zero incentive to play well because you could loose constantly and still be in the playoffs, the season would become a pre-season.
Nothing personal max, but what a crock of sh—.
You’re talking about professional athletes here. They don’t need the incentive to play well every night. It’s been drilled into them since they were 3 or 4 in most cases to try to win every game. But we’re talking about human beings here. They’re not perfect. They make mistakes. They get tired, even when they don’t realize it. They have slumps. People like to make baseball comparisons, well here’s one. How come the best players don’t get hits every time up? The best only get on base about 1 in 3 times. Why? The human element. There’s another 6 guys on the ice every night who also have been taught from an early age to want to win every night. It’s not that they don’t WANT to win every night, it’s because they’re only human and can’t possibly win every night.
And just being good enough to make the playoffs is rarely good enough to make it to and win the final series. They all want to finish as high in the standings as possible. It’s just not possible for everybody to finish first.
Go Jets
Go Devils
Kovalchuk
I think he was much improved and showed the skills that makes him one of the best offensive players in the league. My question is what do you guys see for his future, I am just guessing with my opinion because no one knows anything and a lot might have to do with his playoff experience here, family, and other factors like salary.
I honestly think that if we have a good run or not we should try to sign him. Unfortunatley players like Brodeur and Elias and Jamie are getting up there, they all have a few more years and that money is freed up, along with, to a lesser extent Rolston and his 5 million + a year. We have a good base for the future with Zach (RFA next year), Travis, Andy, some others like Frasier and Clarkson and maybe Zharkov.
I think I know it is not like Lou but he should make him a really good offer for this star player. The cap I know is going up another million next year that could help. If you can anchor a team with two young left wings like that we will always continue to compete as usual. He can also help sell the Devils, ticket sales are up, that might not have anything to do with him, and despite some mistakes he makes trying to do too much I always found him fun to watch, in Atlanta as long as they were not playing us, and even better in a Devils uniform and I know hockey fans like to watch him play.
Just interested in other opinions.
by Padraic Jenkins on Apr 1, 2010 10:34 AM EDT reply actions
Is the cap going up a million or down? I thought it was down. Anyway, I think there is a possibility we sign Kovalchuk. Immediately after we traded for him, it sounded to me like Lou considered this a rental with a low risk, high reward opportunity to significantly make the team better. But as this season progresses, it seems more and more like Kovy is starting to find a comfortable spot within the roster, and it has shown through the number of points he has tallied since becomming a Devil. I get the feeling that Lou will make an offer to Kovy, probably slightly less than market value, and it will come down to Kovy accepting that lower than market value offer in order to play for an annually competitive team like New Jersey. Therefore I believe the choice will rely primarily in Kovy’s hands during the summertime. But regardless, the Devils stil have plenty of reasons to prove to Kovy why he should stay in NJ from now until the end of the Stanley Cup Finals. ;)
"We aim above the mark to hit the mark." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Factors:
He wants to win.
He rejected A LOT of money to stay in Atl. Does he want more money than that, or did he really not want to stay there?
Russia wants him badly.
The next few years have several key Devils coming due for contracts larger than they have now.
There is an impressive crop of young guys maturing well enough to make an impact soon.
I’d love to have him back, but it would have to be a carefully structured deal in which Kovy would be making at least a couple million dollars a year less than other teams could (and likely would) offer, and several million less than the Russians would.
The wild card is how much he likes playing here and how much he feels like part of the team. Things like his attitude, desire to win, comments made after recent losses, dropping Rolo his 700th, etc give the impression that he may very well like it in NJ and be getting along well with his teammates. Does that mean he’d take a paycheck significantly smaller than he could get elsewhere to stay here long term?
I fully expect Lou to make him an offer to stay, especially if he has a good playoff run. Maybe 5 or 6 years. I believe that the offer will be fair in Lou’s mind, both in terms of money for Kovy and what’s best for the team. He’s not going to sacrifice the future of the team to sign a superstar. There’s nothing in Dev’s history (at least that I can think of) that indicates he’d do it. The Devils aren’t a “superstar” driven team. That means it will be an offer lower than what Kovy or his agent would be expecting.
In Lou we Trust.
The sentence that bodes well for the Devils in the playoffs
Against teams currently in the playoffs, the Devils went 5-1-1.
We’ll see how April adds to that with Chicago, Buffalo (and hopefully Atlanta, because that might mean Philly misses out). I see 2-1 against these three teams, Chicago being the loss, although I also have a feeling 6-0 in April is a distinct possibility. I mentioned this once before, but I kind of hope the Devils end up in 4th. That gives them the best possible opponent, and would I believe turn into a better performance by the Devils.
Go Jets
Go Devils

by 























