New Jersey Devils Not Out of Struggles Just Yet, Lose to Calgary Flames 5-3
On Tuesday, the New Jersey Devils put up the first four goals of the game on the San Jose Sharks and then proceeded to concede 3 quick goals in the third period. The Devils didn't lose the lead and went on to win, and I felt there was plenty to be positive. I agree with Steve's recap that A) the opponent was the San Jose Sharks, an elite team in the West, in their building, and one of the top offensive teams in the league; and B) the Devils didn't blow the lead, they just came close to it and then they sorted it out and shut down the Sharks to win 4-3.
Surely, one would think the Devils would be able to build on that. Maybe they did in the first period, where they handled the physical battles with Calgary, Zach Parise got the game's first goal, nearly got a second from Patrik Elias, and looked sharp by period's end. Dainius Zubrus and Brian Rolston were looking good. The defense was solid. Then it all went awry in the second period.
If you're a pessimist about the Devils' fortunes, then this game proved you right. After that first period, it was like February all over again. Bad breaks, the defense giving the puck up too much, the opposition getting quality chances and scoring on them, the Devils not able to respond, and Martin Brodeur not playing out of his mind to bail out every possible mistake. The Flames went on to put up 3 goals in the second and tacked 2 more on in the third period.
A late scoring flurry - a rebound on a power play by Zach Parise and Ilya Kovalchuk's shot being hard enough to get through Miikka Kiprusoff - made the score look respectable at 5-3; but not really indicative of how the game went. A miracle late-game comeback was not to be and, sad to say, the Devils definitely didn't earn it. For the Calgary fans, well, they have to be thrilled. They won a game, they did it by scoring 5 goals, and they did it by taking advantage of opportunities presented to them. They played very well. The fellows at Matchsticks and Gasoline have to feel a little better about Calgary's chances going forward - something they needed given their position in the Western Conference. I apologize to the Flames fans if the following recap doesn't seem like I'm praising you. This is more of a series of criticisms about the Devils' performance. I assure you, Calgary played better for most of the game and earned their win; especially all of the second period.
If you want to check out the official stats, NHL.com has them along with their official recap. Read on further if you want to read more about this bad game by the Devils.
For the second night in a row, goals were given up by New Jersey in short bursts. Tonight, all of the goals against came in two small windows of time: the three second period goals by Calgary were all scored within 3:58 of each other. The two in the third period came 33 second apart. I'm sure that, in conjunction with the Flames scoring 5 goals off of 25 shots, will lead many to think that Martin Brodeur - and only Martin Brodeur - was the big problem tonight. Well, watch these goals in this highlight video from NHL.com and try and tell me that after seeing the goals themselves.
No, Brodeur didn't have a good game. He really should have stopped Daymond Langkow's turnaround backhand shot. The defense didn't do anything wrong there - Brodeur needed to have his stick down or his legs closed on that shot.
But goodness gracious, look what he had to deal with on the other four!
1. Ilya Kovalchuk coughs it up at the point on the power play - a position he's more than just "familiar" with - and Curtis Glencross does his best Alex Ovechkin impersonation on the shorthanded breakaway.
2. Andy Greene runs out of space and just coughs up the puck in the corner to Eric Nystrom who gets past a slow-to-react Bryce Salvador, picks up his own loose puck, and stretches Brodeur for the third goal against in the third period.
3. The Flames have their first real offensive shift of the third period and Rene Bourque takes a shot that's stopped by Brodeur. The shot was hard so the rebound arced up and out. The puck fell in a space in front of Bryce Salvador (facing the blueline) and Matt Stajan (facing the goal). Guess who got there first for the rebound in the slot? Stajan, and he uses Salvador's position as a partial screen to beat Brodeur.
4. 33 seconds after all of that, the Flames get the puck in deep and Mike Mottau can't clear it out. Eventually, the puck is wheeled around to Nicklas Hagman to take a strong shot in the slot. Brodeur stops it and the puck goes to his right on the rebound. Mike Mottau is unfortunately behind David Moss, who was set up on Brodeur's right to tap home the rebound.
I'm sure someone will call me some kind of an apologist or claim that I'm making excuses. Again, watch the video and if you still think I'm wrong, point it out. Because those four goals could have been stopped with proper defending (and I'm including protecting the puck on a
Correct me if I'm wrong, but a key job of the defense is to get to loose pucks and rebounds because goaltenders are usually at the mercy of the shooter on those second chances. When they cough up the puck in deep or are slow to react or don't get to a loose puck or are on the wrong position on someone when one happens, then the goalie is usually going to be in a bad spot. On paper, the Flames put up 25 shots on net and normally a defense that only allows 25 is considered a good thing. Not when they get blown up on chances like the ones the Flames had tonight.
And to see it from Andy Greene and Bryce Salvador - a normally reliable pairing - is just awful. Greene made some costly errors against San Jose, and once again he made a few tonight. Salvador's errors were more due to just reacting slowly. He just let Nystrom cut across then tried to hold him back. For the rebound that Stajan scored on, Salvador was beaten. Not at all a good night for them.
The second period was a black hole for the Devils offensively, which is definitely not good considering they went into it up 1-0 and ending the first on a high note. After Kovalchuk got stripped on that power play, the offense just struggled to put much together. Sure, they put up 8 shots on net, but they weren't difficult for Kiprusoff. Their best chance wasn't even a chance, when Ilya Kovalchuk rushed forward dropped it back for Jamie Langenbrunner who had the shot but decided to try and pass it to Kovalchuk - leaving the puck to astray. They struggled to make good passes in Calgary's zone and on defense, more than a few clearances weren't good enough, allowing Calgary to continue attacking instead of forcing them out. A bad second period defensively and offensively. That it came after a good first period is just mind-boggling. Dainius Zubrus and Brian Rolston, both who looked good early, just sort of faded into the background as the game went on.
They started off the third period looking much better on offense, getting some decent pressure on Calgary, and then halfway through the period it became all for naught. When those two goals happened, the Flames really put the game out of doubt.
I will say that I do appreciate that the Devils didn't go through the motions after Moss' goal. They could have given up on the game, but they didn't. I know, not much positives in a loss like this, but that's a clear one. When they got a power play thanks to Mark Giordano's holding of a player, Jamie Langenbrunner took a hard enough shot to force Kiprusoff to leave a rebound and Parise was all alone to stash it home. Ilya Kovalchuk's hard shot shortly thereafter trickled through for a goal (that flatters Kovalchuk as he didn't have a great game otherwise, namely because he played a major role in giving up a shorthanded breakaway goal). The Devils started pushing ahead and at least made it look like a competitive game at the end. Of course, it was too little, too late.
And that's the frustrating thing. Many Devils fans are very unhappy about the loss because it was reminded them of some of the losses from January and February. The second period was bad. The third period that followed sealed it up. The defense made mistakes that led to goals. The offense didn't respond until it was too late. The power play didn't do well enough (well, they got one, but the others, whatever). Martin Brodeur didn't make miraculous saves. The players are being outworked at times along the boards. An early lead given up yet again. Is Jacques Lemaire on a hot seat now? Does someone need to be benched? Wasn't this supposed to go away after the Olympics? Why is this happening again? Something has to be changed, right? Right?
I can't say that I blame them. I also can't say that there's some magical solution for the Devils to follow. I don't know, most fans don't know, and so the frustration ferments. If you're not a Devils fan, you may look at the record and say, "Come now, you're going to the playoffs, you're a good team, etc." Well, they didn't play like it tonight, they haven't in many games before the Olympics, and now who knows what we'll see going forward.
OK, one place to start will be playing after the other team scores goals. I don't know if that's a mental issue or a tactical issue, but the team has to tighten up after a goal is scored. The answer isn't "Hope Martin Brodeur can stop whatever will be coming at him." It's forcing the opposition to either lose the puck or keep them from getting a great chance. If they had done that tonight, perhaps the result is different. If they don't fix it, it's going to continue to be a major issue defensively.
Come to think of it, the same could be said about their defending in the slot and around the crease. It was fine in the first period, but not so much in the second and third period. It's an area where quick decisions must be made and some risks may have be taken. The third and fourth goals against were great examples where a defenseman reacting too slowly can hurt a team. So that's two areas - perhaps among many others that I'm sure some of you will bring up in the comments - where the Devils need to sharpen up and fast.
At least Zach Parise became the first ever New Jersey Devil to score at least 30 goals in four straight seasons, with 2 goals tonight. Though we can all agree that we'd rather have a win instead.
All I know is that Sunday better bring a positive result for the Devils. Because the month doesn't get any easier after playing the worst team in the NHL. Thanks to Steve for the GameThread; and, of course, thank you all who read and comment on the site. Please leave all your thoughts and complaints in the comments below.
0 recs |
21 comments
|
Comments
One additional note I didn't make in the recap but I'll make here
Surprisingly, the Devils kept their minutes low. The highest TOI for any player on the Devils tonight was Mike Mottau with 21:27. Only 4 other players played just over 20 minutes. Even the fourth line got 10 minutes or so.
Make of that what you will.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
We will recover
Nice recap… I watched the highlights because I couldn’t watch the game and it sure did look like a lot of bounces that were going in great favor of calgary. Yeah I do think there needs to be something done but bench brodeur? No… Anyone is crazy for that thought. Remove Lemaire? No that’s dumb… Bring the guys out for pizza and beer and possibly hookers? Maybe were on the right track. haha. Seriously though it is 2 melt downs in a row but I think something is going to happen and the team will land back on its feet.
Come on people where is your devil pride? Brodeur pride? Lou pride? We will recover!!!
by CaramelCoveredXMas on Mar 6, 2010 12:52 AM EST reply actions
Many thoughts
The Flames came out on fire in the second (sorry).
Where you fault Broduer on the 1st goal, I thought it was an amazing individual effort. Who would have thought he was going to turn around and put that on net that quickly?
The 2nd goal, I like your Ovechkin comparison. As soon as Glencross was gone (and he was off to the races), you knew he was going to score. I still have no idea who the helll he is – my Eastern Conference bias.
On the 3rd goal, I wanted to throw something at Salvador for getting caught flat footed and fishing for the puck. Agree John on not liking the pairing. Someone will make room for Skuola for a game or two and at this point, I can’t see it being Fraser the way he’s played.
The 4ht goal was just a nice bat job by Stajan. I couldn’t fault Marty on it.
The 5th goal, I fault Marty for missing the poke check and giving up a soft rebound and then being out of position.
People at the meetup’s biggest feeling, is that the Devils haven’t learned how to play with Kovalchuk yet. That 2nd goal wasn’t the winning goal, but it was the confidence goal the Flames needed to get them going. Sheri Ross called that one the “game changer.” The Flames announcers said something along the lines of, “It’s amazing what a couple goals can do to your confidence.” Kovalchuk made a fatal defensive error.
The other thing we commented on Kovy is that the Devils seem to want to pass to him more on odd man rushes and on the PP. They get tentative and want to feed him (maybe per Jacques) but they pass sometimes when they should shoot.
And we’re out of 1st place now.
On the plus side, we have to KIM that Calgary made a lot of trades and this was their 1st game with them and they SHOULD HAVE come out on fire (sorry again). . . and we have Edmonton next.
Anyway, the meetup we probably had 15 Devil fans combined with people supporting us. The Devil Dancers came. The bar was packed anyway, so it was good PR for the Devils and hockey. I talked to many people who were made they couldn’t get the drink specials but they were watching the game. Hockey had center attention for a packed place last night and that’s a great thing.
I have respect for most sports fans with 2 exceptions: NY Ranger fans who grew up in New Jersey, and Dallas Cowboy fans who can't name the capital of Texas.
Oh and Clarkson
Thank God he’s back. He provided us with some cheers and it was nice to see his motivation.
I have respect for most sports fans with 2 exceptions: NY Ranger fans who grew up in New Jersey, and Dallas Cowboy fans who can't name the capital of Texas.
Anyway, the meetup we probably had 15 Devil fans combined with people supporting us. The Devil Dancers came. The bar was packed anyway, so it was good PR for the Devils and hockey. I talked to many people who were made they couldn’t get the drink specials but they were watching the game. Hockey had center attention for a packed place last night and that’s a great thing.
That’s very good to hear. Hopefully, more of them will continue to check out hockey – preferably the Devils, of course.
People at the meetup’s biggest feeling, is that the Devils haven’t learned how to play with Kovalchuk yet. That 2nd goal wasn’t the winning goal, but it was the confidence goal the Flames needed to get them going. Sheri Ross called that one the "game changer." The Flames announcers said something along the lines of, "It’s amazing what a couple goals can do to your confidence." Kovalchuk made a fatal defensive error.
I do agree that that goal against – in retrospect – really changed the course of the game. It was a terrible turnover to give up and I know some may be wondering “Couldn’t Marty stop the breakaway,” but generally a breakaway favors the shooter since the goaltender has to play it aggressively enough to force a bad shot, which Marty did, but Glencross guessed right all the way.
I think with the decision to pass it back to Kovalchuk on a rush it really does depend on the player. Here’s an example. On Tuesday, Kovalchuk laid it off for Elias who shot the puck which led to the first goal off a loose puck. Last night, in a similar play, Kovalchuk rushed up into the slot, laid it off for Langenbrunner, who decided to pass it (I believe that’s the play you’re talking about). Elias knew it was a good not great shot to take; Langenbrunner decided otherwise. Given that Elias has played more with Kovalchuk than Langenbrunner, you might be right.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
Here we go again
The post from the fans after every game continue to be the same. This team has been begging for a second line center and another top four defenseman for a while now but the call has fallen on deaf ears. The cureent second line of Zubrus, Elias & Kovalchuk has a lot of talent but looks lost with the sum of their part is less than their talent. The current team has a lot of offensive players yet JL wants to play a defensive style to protect Marty & the defensemen. Forget the record for least goals allowed by a team etc since this stat is misgiving. The return of Martin will hepl but after been out most of the season what kind of spark can you expect from him ?
The post from the fans after every game continue to be the same.
No they aren’t. I should know, I write them.
This team has been begging for a second line center and another top four defenseman for a while now but the call has fallen on deaf ears.
Who at the trade deadline would you have wanted and who you would have wanted to give up to get said players? Also, does a different second line center and another top four defenseman make Greene-Salvador play any better last night or somehow magically prevent Kovalchuk coughing up the puck at the point?
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
It seems that Devils Organization does not value the contribution of a center to his wing or how else can you describe the talents of Zubrus, Niedemeyer, Mc Ammound & Pelley ? At best they are 3rd of 4th line centers. Elias & Rolston are been paid very well but their skills are underutilized with no playmaker ! The same goes for Kolvalchuk with a center we just traded player for this rental and will not get any return for this rental during the first round of the playoffs.
My point about Marty isn’t that he has to stop the impossible as I and others have previously posted,thats always a bonus when goalies do that and I only mentioned that in past posts because it was something more common for him to do than uncommun unlike in recent times.Again, he’s not the sole problem of late not by a long shot, I am merely pointing out defeciences in his game that I never noticed before just by years of watching him. Those defeciences I’m talking about are that he’s letting to many soft goals in at the worst times before making his great saves, this affects game momentum which is everything in a game, something statisics do not show. And I rightly or wrongly cannot put most of the honus on the “D” for most goals scored against us because if you look at the standings we, like always; have the fewest goals scored against us and even more impressive allowing the fewest shots on goal, so it kind of sounds ludicrous faulting our defense for most of the goals allowed. If one doesn’t see it this way then maybe the answer is to replace our whole defense,but how do you improve on their statistics?
I kind of agree too. This is something I noticed at the very beginning of the season. I guess its just because Brodeur has been a God for us throughout his entire career. But literally since the first game of this season against the Flyers, Brodeur looks like his reflexes are exactly one step slower than they used to be. He’s still a good goalie because he understands the game as well as anyone in the world. At this point in his career, he is still probably one of the best positional goaltenders in the NHL. But he definitely seems to be reacting slower this year. Maybe this is just me. Maybe there are many other circumstances that I am refusing to take into account. Or maybe I am looking too much into this and its all in my head. What I do wish is that we kept Clemmenson around for another go-around because, at the height of the Devils winning streak last year, he was in the middle of it.
"We aim above the mark to hit the mark." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
I would also like to add this entire situation with Brodeur kind of reminds me of Dominik Hasek. Two of the greatest goalies of all time. At what point in their career can a team, management and fanbase put aside a hall of fame career, an unparalleled legacy, and change goalies? For Hasek it happened in the middle of a stanley cup run in 2008; Hasek was replaced by Osgood in the middle of the first round of the Stanley Cup Playoffs, and Detroit went on to win the Stanley Cup. At the time Hasek was 43, mind you. And of course there are several differences between the two players. Brodeur has been a Devil his entire career. Hasek was with a mixture of teams throughout his career. Its such a difficult situation to fully understand.
"We aim above the mark to hit the mark." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
And I rightly or wrongly cannot put most of the honus on the "D" for most goals scored against us because if you look at the standings we, like always; have the fewest goals scored against us and even more impressive allowing the fewest shots on goal, so it kind of sounds ludicrous faulting our defense for most of the goals allowed. If one doesn’t see it this way then maybe the answer is to replace our whole defense,but how do you improve on their statistics?
No, it doesn’t.
Goals against and shots against averages are just that – they take an entire season into account. Good if you’re trying to get an idea how a team has performed during the season; but it doesn’t account for what happens game-to-game. It definitely doesn’t account for how those goals and shots happened. They don’t tell us whether or not the defense/team is prone to making stupid errors that play a big role in losing games. They just say that they don’t allow a lot of shots and goals in general.
Of course, it’s generally good to have a low goals & shots against average; but it means very little within the construct of one game. Allowing 25 shots on it’s surface is very good; but that alone doesn’t tell us whether a defenseman was caught standing still or slow on a play or coughing up the puck. Which was what happened last night. One could argue that you can’t expect a defense to play perfectly, but I’m not looking for perfection – just fewer gigantic errors. Make more minor errors if it means fewer big faults that play a big role in goals against.
If anything, the very good team statistics further shines a bad light on the defense/team for a poor performance because we all know that they can do better and there’s evidence of that.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
Devils vs. first-time opponents
This is probably too small for a FanPost, so I guess a long comment will have to do…
It occured to me during the game that it feels like the Devils always struggle when facing a team for the first time – the season-opening losses to Philly and New York, losses against Dallas, Vancouver, etc. so I took a look at the Devils’ record the first time they faced an opponent and compared it to the second leg.
True to my anecdotal evidence, the Devils have struggled (relatively speaking) the first time they play an opponent – in 27 games they were just 14-12-1 and were actually outscored 71-79.
In 16 games against teams for the SECOND time, however, the Devils fared MUCH better: 13-3-0 and outscoring opponents 51-28.
I’m not sure what the implications of this are – some of those first-game losses came against teams the Devils only play once in the regular season (Chicago, Colorado, Calgary, etc.) and a quick glance at the record splits shows the Devils faring MUCH better against the Eastern Conference than the West (32-15-2 against 6-7-1 respectively). Maybe it just takes the team a game under their belt to ‘figure out’ an opponent, maybe Lemaire needs a full practice to adjust to an opponent’s game plan, but SOMETHING is keeping the Devils from playing their best hockey when they face a team for the first time…
Zharkov
This is a bit off topic. I like Zharkov’s hustle but when are we going to get a goal out of him. I think they might as well bring another kid up now and get him a little bit of experience for possible playoff run.
by Devilssection21fan on Mar 6, 2010 3:10 PM EST reply actions
I agree with your Zharkov statement, Devilssection. He hustles and plays hard on a nightly basis, but we need someone up here who can score. Why not let Palmieri or Davis get another shot? They only played for like two games and actually performed pretty well. I wouldn’t mind seeing either in his place right now.
"We aim above the mark to hit the mark." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
IN A NUTSHELL, ALL WE HAVE TO KNOW IS...
Defensively, this is the same team that gave away a 3 games to 2 lead over Carolina, and choked away the lead in Game 7 w/ two minutes to play. Only this year they’re even worse because Oduya was traded away. This is why the Devils won’t get past the first round this year either.
Defense
Is just very overworked. You are asking a group of players that essentially lacks a top pair to perform to a level that is above their ability. The only reason we feel justified in doing it is because they overachieved the first half of the season. The return of Paul Martin won’t help just because he’s talented but just because he’s another body that will be fresh. I almost think the Devils should rotate two guys out each week in order to rest some of these guys that have played an exorbitant number of minutes in Martin and eventually Oduya’s absence. Skoula, although a depth guy, has also only played about 35 games this season, so he’s not necessarily beat up. He and Salmela, who did not get a regular shift with Atlanta, are the freshest, and Paul Martin will obviously be well rested. Therefore, you can have Salvador, White, Mottau, Fraser, Greene, and anyone else (i.e. Corrente) fill the last 3 spots while the other two sit and rest as the two gets ready for the playoffs.

by 


















