Like Banging a Head at a Wall: New Jersey Devils Fall to Edmonton Oilers 2-0
The New Jersey Devils went into Edmonton tonight to play the Edmonton Oilers, who has the worst record in the NHL. They went off the ice at the end of regulation as the second-best team on the ice. In other words, they lost. And it wasn't just any loss. No, it was a bad. Real bad. A 2-0 loss to the Edmonton Oilers. Already unhappy with how the Devils lost to Calgary 5-3 on Friday, this loss only angers, frustrate, and disappoint the fans even more. Get ready to read a lot of comments about how "THE DEVILS LOST TO THE OILERS!!!111 THE WORST TEAM IN HOCKEY!!!1111" Well, not from me, but that will be the underlying sentiment. I can't say I blame them.
What they will (and should) not tell you that the game ending 2-0 would be a surprise. In fact, Devils fans with proper memories will tell you that the kind of game the Devils played tonight is some kind of a new low. The Devils looked this bad against the Islanders on January 18 (4-0 loss); against the Senators on January 26 (3-0 loss); and against the Maple Leafs on February 2 (3-0 loss). All games where the offense was punchless and the defense was beaten.
That's the sad reality. It's not just that the shutout loss to the Oilers was bad enough; but now the losses are starting to repeat. I know in December, the Devils put out a lot of sub-optimal performances by the Devils but at least they were winning those games. Where is that team? I don't know. Only the Devils players can answer that question.
If you'd like the Oilers' take on this win, check out Benjamin Massey's post-game report at The Copper & Blue. Amazingly (or not?), the Oilers did all this without Dustin Penner, their leading forward, playing well. If you'd like to read more about this game, check out my additional thoughts after the jump.
I don't care if you think I'm being some kind of an apologist or whatever jive you'd like to spout, and I don't care if the following may offend you. If you're going to fault Martin Brodeur for tonight's game, then you're being completely daft. Moronic. Idiotic. Totally unreasonable. And so on.
The Devils' defense was caught in bad positions, leaving Oiler skaters wide open in the slot for shots. Brodeur stopped those shots. The defense gave away the puck - and no, I don't mean a bad clearance, I mean giving the puck right to the Oilers' forwards in the slot (I can't forget that one by Bryce Salvador, it was so awful - and Brodeur bailed out the D with several big saves. Brodeur faced 35 shots, many of them coming on an Edmonton counter-attack, and he was beaten twice:
Two one-timers in the slot, the first by Gilbert Brule and the second by Marc Pouliot. Great shots by both players who weren't covered enough. They placed them perfectly, they were lightning fast in their shots, and they were close enough to the net for the whole play to happen instanteously. They are picture perfect examples of why teams try to send passes into the slot - to set up shots like that. For those are incredibly tough shots (if down right impossible in some cases) for any goaltender in the world to stop. If you honestly want to argue that Brodeur should have had those too, then I'm sorry, but I got no words for you.
I'm writing so many words about Brodeur because he was the only one in a New Jersey Devils uniform to actually show up and play hard in this game. He made big saves, he robbed several Oilers of goals, he was the big, solitary reason the Oilers didn't just rout the Devils. Brodeur did his job and did it as well as he could have. Brodeur did as well as anyone can honestly expect from him.
The other guys in Devils uniforms did not.
Now, the Oilers utilized one of their strengths as defined by Derek Zona in the preview incredibly well: their counter attack. From the second period and onward, the Devils would get the puck into Edmonton's zone and quickly lose control. The forwards would force passes, take shots that weren't there, and generally concede possession. The Oilers defended the Devils well enough and would just strike on the counter attack. Up the ice they went and the Devils were often on the heels of their skates. Brodeur would make a save or the defense would get lucky and get a stop, and repeat the cycle. Since the early goal by Brule, the Devils players wanted to get in deep to set something up. But because of a bad pass or a shot, the Oilers' defense collected it and rushed up ice as soon as they got control. Therefore, the Oilers had several 3-on-2 and 2-on-2 chances. This leads to open shots for the Oilers and they took them over and over and over.
While they didn't score so many goals thanks to Mr. Brodeur, they put up 16 shots in the second period. 16! After a first period where they had more possession but were well defended by the Devils and looked out of sync. They only had 3 shots on net in that first period; to allow 16 in the following period is obscene. Especially when the Devils' PK units totally thwarted the Edmonton power play twice in the second. The Devils' lack of offensive pressure really hurt them tonight.
Of course, more than a few giveaways by the Devils' defensemen (all of them had some kind of a bad giveaway at some point or another in the game) gifted the Oilers a few excellent shots that Brodeur had to turn away. Let me Paul Martin alone can't make the other players remember basic concepts on defense - like not blindly shoveling the puck into the middle or forcing the puck up ice with an opponent in front of you. Bryce Salvador has been worse than Mike Mottau in these three games. Andy Greene was a little better. Colin White may still have marks from being burnt by Robert Nilsson en route to the Pouliot goal. Martin Skoula started off OK in his first game as a Devil, but he regressed badly as the game went on. While that may be excused (to a point) as it was his first game with the team; Anssi Salmela cannot, he was too tepid in his own zone and didn't read the situation right en route to Brule's goal. He may have played himself off the lineup for the next game with the poor play in his own zone.
Going back to the game overall, did the Devils make many adjustments in the third period? Well, the defensemen jumped on the play a little more, but that did little to quell the Edmonton counter attack. So other than that, no. No they did not. Over and over again, the Devils would try to get in deep on offense, fail due to their poor decision making and puck movement, and the Oilers would come rushing up again. The Oilers ended the third period with 16 more shots on net for a final total of 35, they only allowed 7 by New Jersey in response, and decidedly won the game as the better team on the ice. It wasn't so much the Devils played down to them as much as they played right into their hands.
The Devils' poor shooting and passing on offense got them only 22 on Jeff Deslauriers. 18 attempts were blocked by an Edmonton defense who looked very good tonight; and 16 attempts missed the net entirely. I repeat: the Devils were definitely poor at shooting the puck. To be fair, Deslauriers was more than just fine tonight. He gave up very few rebounds, he held onto the puck quite well, and he was always sure to keep his 5-hole closed. Deslauriers played quite well. That said, the biggest challenges he faced came either from just a big scrum in front of the net by ZZ Pops trying to get a "garbage" goal off aloose puck or when Ilya Kovalchuk was rushing to the net.
If you held a gun to my head and demanded that I point out a Devils' skater - forward or defenseman - that played well, then I'd say it was Kovalchuk. He had 5 shots on net; he rarely took a shift off - only leaving one early because he took a stinger to the hand; willed himself to create a breakaway through traffic; and had the best shots that Deslauriers had faced. That said, his performance clearly wasn't enough to get the team going. I felt he didn't threaten on offense consistently over the 21:25 of ice time he got tonight. To say he had a good game would be generous in my opinion. Only Brodeur was the indisputably good Devil on the ice tonight. However, what Kovalchuk did was a lot more than I can say over what David Clarkson, Dainius Zubrus, Travis Zajac, Jamie Langenbrunner, and Brian Rolston (among others) did tonight.
Nevertheless, the offense as a whole by the Devils didn't do much and the defense was shaky. The first period wasn't so bad but when the Oilers started rushing ahead in the second period, the Devils didn't have an answer. Jacques Lemaire and the coaching staff didn't appear to try and change things up. The leadership on the team didn't appear to motivate the Devils work harder or approach the game some other way. I mean, it's almost a sick comedy at this point: this roster can put 4 straight goals on San Jose in their building but struggle mightily against the Oilers.
The reality is that the cliche is true: a team's record means nothing on the ice; on any given day, anyone can beat anyone. And anyone can beat the Devils with the type of performance they put out there, aside from Brodeur. Just like the Islanders, Senators, and Maple Leafs did earlier this season in terrible shutout losses for the Devils. All games where the offense was impotent, the defense was as sturdy as a wet paper bag, and the goaltender was the only reason why the score didn't go completely out of control.
Don't just take my word for it. Zach Parise had this to say after the game, as reported by Tom Gulitti (link also has a very unhappy Jacques Lemaire, by the way):
"It was brutal," left wing Zach Parise said. "We did not play well at all. We deserved to lose."
I appreciate the honesty, but surely the Devils do know that they're the ones who can do something about this, right?
I'm sure you're angry. You're upset. You're confused. You're frustrated. You're disgusted. You're disappointed. I understand. I'm certainly not happy by this either. No Devils fan really should be, not after a shutout loss to anyone, much less the Oilers.
But you can't tell me that you're surprised at the final score given how the Devils played tonight.
Thanks for reading. Please leave your thoughts in the comments. If you want to see them for some reason, here are the highlights to tonight's game from NHL.com:
35 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Note
I did quickly update this to add a direct link to Copper & Blue’s recap.
Also: Dean McAmmond left the game early due to a stinger being aggravated, as reported by Gulitti. So there’s one Devil forward who didn’t have an awful night – the guy who didn’t even play in all three periods.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
You called this a "trap game"
I was thinking that the entire time. But I will defer from the D criticism (because there will be enough of it) and regurgitate an important point Sherry Ross was overemphasizing: Outside of the ZZPop line, the Devils are not threatening. Before Jacques split them up . . . in the 1st period of this game and in the 3rd of last game, Ross pointed out this obvious lackluster performance of the rest of the offense. But obviously she had done everything except directly calling out Elias, Zubs and the entire 3rd line. I know Kovalchuk played well enough, and had the best chance, and yes he got 5 shots on goal, but he also seems to make bad decisions on others. I would be interested to know how many of the blocked shots (or passes) were his?
The other lines need to wake up, well, at least they’ll have some days to practice a home. 2 will be considered a lot at this juncture of the year.
I have respect for most sports fans with 2 exceptions: NY Ranger fans who grew up in New Jersey, and Dallas Cowboy fans who can't name the capital of Texas.
I know Kovalchuk played well enough, and had the best chance, and yes he got 5 shots on goal, but he also seems to make bad decisions on others. I would be interested to know how many of the blocked shots (or passes) were his?
Per the Event Summary at NHL.com, the official scorer credited 1 shot attempt that was blocked and 1 attempt that missed by Kovalchuk.
Now that I’m looking at it closely, the efficiency by Parise was terrible: 1 shot on goal, 3 blocked, 3 missed the net. Hmmm.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Mar 8, 2010 12:09 AM EST up reply actions
Just a few points...
Marty played very well. He kept us in this game despite the outcome. I am also starting to see more of a mis-communication between Marty when he handles the puck specifically behind the net and the defenders. He usually end up playing it off the boards (which doesn’t work), or does pass it to a defender, which is then battled and lost. I am seeing it more and more. The passing was horrendous tonight. Maybe the team is trying too hard to get out of this slump. They didn’t look slow or lazy. They were just off, making that one mistake that would cost them, or not capitalizing on chances. They played well against San Jose (THE BEST TEAM IN THE LEAGUE). Maybe they have a tendency to play to the level of their opponent? I don’t know the answer. I hope the next 2 days, the team goes over some film, and gets back to some basics (being physical to win battles along the boards; back checking in the neutral zone; and shooting/passing accuracy from everyone).
Heads up everyone…this team just needs to find what it’s good at again.
by Matthew Ventolo on Mar 8, 2010 12:49 AM EST reply actions
Something I'm ready for
The playoffs. Yes I understand that everyone thinks because we are doing so bad we are going to fail in the playoffs but teams go into the playoffs all the time on top of their game and bail out in the first round. The playoffs are like a brand new season and I think we have probably one of the top 3 teams in the league and really believe if we can put some intensity together we will go far and hopefully bring the cup home.
by CaramelCoveredXMas on Mar 8, 2010 1:04 AM EST reply actions
Agreed
Thou an alarming loss the Devs will get back on winning ways before the season is over, if not we got the playoffs where everything can change i have faith in this team and everyone else should too.
by NJDevilsSteve on Mar 8, 2010 1:49 AM EST up reply actions
I really wish I had your optimism. I have been trying to be hopeful, but it is getting more and more difficult. It’s as if immediately after that awesome Devils/Ranger game that ended in 0-0 after overtime, this team decided to call the season over. I don’t see how we can turn things around when the playoffs start without the turnaround starting before the season’s end.
someone call 911 for our power play
by Devil_Hard_Core on Mar 8, 2010 9:29 AM EST up reply actions
Apology
I received a warning in regards to a post I made that went against this"In Lou we Trust" forum. Because I did not take the time to read the provisions as I should have I made this mistake in err and apologize to this moderator and all involved with this fine community of devil fans.
Well then, welcome to the club. I got one of those already. LoL
You're Next!
by thatguy011071 on Mar 8, 2010 8:33 AM EST up reply actions
Lemaire
Jacques is going no where. BANK on it.
Fact is our defense isn’t that good. The reason we didn’t go very far last year in the play offs? DEFENSE. Lets Hope Martin adds a spark.
And lets lay off Marty. You could have Marty and Roy in goal standing next to each other, but if its a shooting gallery someones going to get it past.
Time to get a little younger on the 3rd and 4th line offense also. We have a lot of young talent in lowell.
I agree on the getting younger on D. I have said this in other posts. I would rather have the youngsters in there and let them have their growing pains now instead of next season. Our defense is below average and I don’t think its good enough to get the Stanley Cup finals with. The talent level just isn’t there.
Now I know Broduer can’t be faulted for every goal given up however, our defense just does not help him very much, they always appear a step behind. I can’t wait for the youngsters to join the team so we can show Salvador and Mottau the door. I would rather deal with the mistakes of a lack of experience to that of veteran who is probably playing at the best of his ability which in the case of the two mentioned is not that good. I still think that the defense is the achilles heal of this team, I just don’t believe it is good enough to win the Stanley Cup. Of course, I hope I am wrong however, our defense (beyond Martin and possibly Greene) would all be bottom pairing defenseman on teams with more talent on the blue line.
You're Next!
by thatguy011071 on Mar 8, 2010 12:10 PM EST up reply actions
Bring back the kids
Bring back the kids that were playing so well and kept the Devils in 1st place while people were out injured. Obviously the group Niedermeyer-Rolston-Elias-Langenbrunner and others only play when they feel like. Langenbrunner hasn’t played all year the way he did in the Olympics. Elias and Rolston are unheard of when they are on the ice.Niedermeyer is over the hil. Bench Mottau and bring Fraser back. which of the 2 has a better +/-.. of most of all, FIRE LEMAIRE AND BRING JOHNNY MAC UP TO COACH, AT LEAST HE CAN MOTIVATE PLAYERS. Look how well Lowell is doing.
Yes, look how well they’re doing… in the AHL
by undersuspicion426 on Mar 8, 2010 12:50 PM EST up reply actions
There's a lot of anger here
I can’t imagine what the anger will be if they come out flat against the Rangers. I am extremely angry and embarrassed as well. However, we all know this will subside a bit if the Devils can beat the Rangers.
I’ve been all over the D, but I’m more concerned about the O. I mean we’ve been shutout enough this year to question this.
My 2 suspects: Elias and Rolston
Do we think Elias was a little more affected by the concussion than we think? Could you move Rolston up with Kovy to see if he responds. It seems both of them just need a goal to get going mentally.
I have respect for most sports fans with 2 exceptions: NY Ranger fans who grew up in New Jersey, and Dallas Cowboy fans who can't name the capital of Texas.
Lots of anger and knee-jerk reactions after last night’s loss. I agree with some of them and understand where you guys are coming from. Patrick Elias and Brian Rolston have disappeared from this offense. Its especially noticable considering the fact that both of them were playing quite well after Elias got back from injuries. Niedermeyer has not played well but I wouldn’t hold that much against him considering he doesn’t play that many minutes to begin with, and everyone understands his role. I agree that Langenbrunner hasn’t played that well for about two months now, not including the Olympics. He was a very big scoring threat last year. Not so much this year.
If we can base Lou’s tolerance for head coaches at a minimum based on previous years, we can expect Lemaire to be on the chopping block. Something needs to change dramatically by the end of this month. This team is way too talented to be shutout by the Oilers. Fortunately for us, we play 8 games at home this month and four games away. That should give the team an opportunity to build some confidence back at the Rock.
"We aim above the mark to hit the mark." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
by Tim G on Mar 8, 2010 12:18 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Where are the Devs from the first half of the season?
It’s really frustrating! Not just for Lamaire and Lamoriello and the players, but for us as the loyal fans who follow the team, come to the games, cheer for the successes and hurt with the team for the failures…
This is the team that was at the top of the Atlantic division for most of the season, topped the Eastern conference for a few weeks and was sttod at the top of the entire league for a few days… and this all happened in this season and at the time when we had 6 key players on the injured list!
How have things turned around so drastically?
Everyone was crying for Jacque’s head when we started out 0-2 and then quickly forgot that when we turned it around.
I’m hoping this is all just a post-Olympic migraine. The game Wednesday night I would say is more of a bellwether game than the Edmonton game. If the O is just as bad Wednesday as they were last night, then I would say that it’s time for Lou to do something drastic. With a front six of Elias, Parise, Langs, Zajac, Zubrus, and Kovy, we should be closer to averaging 4 per game instead of getting blanked over and again.
People have broken down their system
Again I’m quoting Sherry Ross, and I apologize in advance for relying on one source, but she said something (again) that was very interesting last night.
She said that it seems other teams have studied the Devils’ (Jacques) system and know how to beat them, specifically their D. I’m paraphrasing, but she mentioned that “other teams have seemed to figure out the formula to beat the Devils, don’t dump and chase but just gain the blueline and send bodies toward the net and you will expose their defensive weaknesses.”
To me this was very concerning and would seem to provide a logical explanation on paper as the the drop off from December as a team. Of course, Pee Wee hockey players are told to drive to the net all of the time, but if the Devils’ defense concedes the blueline, then a dump-and-chase team can adjust if the D are making the same mistakes. Opposing teams just need to gain the blueline and send 2 bodies down low, knowing they’ll over match the Devils there (partially it’s why I see the Skoula move – to try and get a bigger body down there).
Of course, that being said, you know there’s no silver bullet for nailing the Devils’ recent struggles. Mental toughness and intangibles figure greatly into slumps and winning streaks. But if Ross has a point it does leave me with a lot of worry. If other teams are simply watching the tape on the Devils and seeing the same kind of mistakes that this forum keeps brining up, then it is indeed more of a coaching thing than I perceived before.
Please tell me I’m wrong . . .
I have respect for most sports fans with 2 exceptions: NY Ranger fans who grew up in New Jersey, and Dallas Cowboy fans who can't name the capital of Texas.
I don’t disagree with the sentiment, but I think it’s more complex than that.
Militarily, that’s the equivalent of a full frontal assault, which is the most unimaginative and basic of attacks. One a child could and would come up with.
Teams have obviously found the chinks in the armor and Jacque either won’t or can’t adjust.
Wish I could...
But that’s the problem. JL has always been a system-first coach. That’s why Skoula was picked up, already knew the system. Unfortunately, it’s not a novel (or particularly effective) system now that the entire league, east and west have played against it so much. Unless your control game is clicking, there’s no puck movement, and one guy out of position (which there seemed to be waaaaay too many of last night) and a pass longer than 15 feet is all it takes to carve right through “the system” and counter.
Every team the Devs play more than once a year need to watch the tape from this game and treat it like an instruction manual about how to beat them.
I started out this season hating the choice to bring JL back to the Devs for precisely this reason. He’s all about the system, and players seem to be treated like plug-and-play-not-so-well tools in a human erector set. When things started going very well for so long, I ate my words over many pitchers of beer with the friends. It’s starting to look like I got some pitchers coming in my future. I don’t think JL or the “system” was the right choice.
The solution is really simple. Lose the damned system. It’s old. It doesn’t work anymore. The NHL is different than it was when it worked. Teams know all about it and how to beat it. Put your best guys on the ice at the same time and stop trying to force some kind of half-fast chemistry between players that don’t have it to begin with.
A couple (hours a day) of passing and position drills wouldn’t hurt either.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Match_fixing
I know many people will disagree with me but it’s just my opinion (so save your comments). Besides what we say in this forum has absolutely no effect whatsoever on the decisions made by Jacques or Lou. So I might as well say it. It looked to me like Devils intentionally lost those two games in Canada, and they definitely did not score as high as they can.
LET’S GO DEVILS!!
With all due respect, this is the craziest & dumbest theory posted yet regarding the struggles.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
i know. i just don’t have any other “theories” as you call them left to explain this slump.
by Voice from NJ on Mar 8, 2010 5:09 PM EST up reply actions
Theory — A: a hypothesis assumed for the sake of argument or investigation B : an unproved assumption : conjecture
What else would you have him call an unsubstantiated and illogical explanation as that?
Occams Razor, man. You’re looking for explanations way out in the stratosphere, when the real answers are much closer to home.
Final point: if you have no explanations, admitting that fact but still posting ludicrous suggestions doesn’t advance the conversation.
gate receipts must be around $45 million, players expenses $55 million. plus administration costs, new arena expenses like much higher depreciation, taxes, etc. One would wonder.
I’m going to address a bunch of these later. A quick thought about the system being the problem, though. Were it as simple as opponents figuring out how the Devils have played, wouldn’t we have seen a lot more losses in late October and November?
It’s not like Lemaire came up with something so revolutionary or innovative that it would take months for opposition coaches and players to figure out. In fact, if you’re perceptive enough, then you probably can figure it out within a period and make adjustments accordingly. Generally, the tactics employed in a game depends on what the players can do and who they are facing. This belies an issue with in-game adjustments not being made correctly, though who knows whether it’s the coach not making the right decisions or the players not playing well enough to follow directions anyway.
Clearly, something needs to change, but I’m not sold on the idea of changing the head coach or changing the whole system for that reason.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
hello everyone welcome to positive thinking.
I am sorry to hear that most Devil fans have quit on this team. The defense is bad,the coach needs to be fired. Marty is over the hill. These are just a few of the complaints about the team that are going around. Now I believe that the Devils who have not been playing on home ice for a long time need some home cooking. Also I believe that now that Martin is coming back that will help the powerplay. I also believe that our coach will start letting the lines gell and keep them together more once everyone is back. I also believe the Devils will get more motivated the closer the playoffs come around. I also believe that once the Devils start to win again beginning Wednesday against the Rangers that people will start talking positively again. I also believe the Devils will play well against the Penguins and shut down Crosby and Malkin. I also believe that I love the Devils and as a true Devils fan I never give up on the team. Because over the years the Devils have always shown me that when they play at their best they can beat anybody..Go Devils
Donald Vasquez
I just had to throw in my comment regarding the person who thought the Devils intentionally lost those two games. Have you noticed that the Devils have played sub-par hockey for the last two months now? Do you think they intentionally lost those games too? Your theory has to be one of the worst I have read on this board in quite some time. There is absolutely no reason to believe that a team, once sitting on top of the eastern conference and the league, would willingly lose to the worst team in the league. And not only lose, but get shutout in an embarassing fashion. This team has played pitiful for many weeks now. Do you think they tanked all of those games too?
"We aim above the mark to hit the mark." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson

by 















