Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

New Jersey Devils Tie Up the Series; Beat Philadelphia Flyers 5-3 in Game 2

I said this game was a must win and on that basis alone, tonight was an unqualified success.  The New Jersey Devils defeated the Philadelphia Flyers 5-3 to tie up the series at 1 game apiece.  The Prudential Center was rocking from the first minute, went into some short lulls when the Flyers scored, but the Devils gave them a reason to get happy in the stands throughout the game.

The Devils improved a little bit with respect to patience with the puck - something I stressed on Thursday as a "must improve" for the Devils - and the results speak for themselves.  New Jersey attempted only more shot tonight than they did in Game 1, but they got more shots on net. They were blocked 10 times, they missed the net 12 times, and forced 33 shots on Brian Boucher.   Across three power plays, the Devils got 7 shots on net - including a goal that proves why a team should never just freely shoot the puck.  The team generally improved in regard to shooting because they weren't rushing as much; and I think it helped them win this game.

In terms of a Devil, let's praise Zach Parise heavily.  He was raring to go right from the beginning.  In addition to his normal and power play duties, he was killing penalties and scored an absolute world-class goal to draw first blood.  He took the shot that Dainius Zubrus touched up to win the game in the slot.  He was all over the place down low, not letting the likes of Chris Pronger and Mike Richards intimidate him.  When the third period came around, Parise was among the first to be double-shifte.  Parise put up 6 shots on net, played 20:06, and I hope this is the start of something good for the Devils in the postseason.

All Devils fans naturally hope this game will be the start of something good. The crowd was elated when Ilya Kovalchuk scored that empty net goal and everyone was pumped leaving the arena into the drizzled night of Newark. Needless to say, a win will make people feel good.  Not to sound like Captain Bring-Down but the Devils win didn't come without their own share of problems.  Moreover, the series isn't completely flipped: the Devils will need to get something in Philadelphia to truly make this series their own again.  But with tonight's win, I can't blame you if you think it's much more possible now.

For the official stats and a neutral recap, please check out this recap at NHL.com.  If you're interested in how the Flyers fans reacted to tonight's game, Ben Rothenberg has this recap at Broad Street Hockey. I swear I'm not making that up.  For my additional thoughts on tonight's game, please continue after the jump.

Star-divide

In general, I felt this was a bit of a roller coaster of a game, largely in part to the Devils' penalty troubles.  Yes, tonight's game did feature Chris Pronger holding Zach Parise's stick after Parise actually checked Pronger pretty hard; and Mike Richards punching Parise in the head after a whistle during the Devils 4-on-3 power play in front of the ref without any kind of call.  Yes, the refs missed a lot of calls on both sides.  Yes, Tom Gulitti was absolutely right about the non-calls and this Jacques Lemaire quote is entirely appropriate:

When I asked Lemaire if he was confused by the calls, he initially just said, "aaaaaaaaaah."

When I asked what he could say in a diplomatic fashionm he replied. "I can’t talk about it. I would LOVE to, but I cannot talk about it. Thank you."

But it doesn't excuse New Jersey. The Devils got caught way too many times going over the line, plain and simple.

Aside: I'm going to start calling Richards the Honorless Captain.  He is without honor and it's a shame because he's so talented. He picked up two assists, he had 2 shots on net, played 24:40, drew Kovalchuk into a slashing minor (which the Flyers did little on the ensuing power play) and went 13 for 23 on faceoffs. He had a good night but my big takeaway from Game 2 was his cheapshots on Parise in the first period.

Part of this has to do with the rivalry, where tempers tend to flare. Part of this has to do with it being the playoffs, where emotions run over.   Still, the Devils lost their cool way and crossed the fine line with respect to hits.   Three interference calls (two on Colin White and one on Andy Greene), one elbowing call (Ilya Kovalchuk), one slashing call (Kovalchuk whilst goaded into fighting by Mike Richards), a high-sticking call (Greene), and one tripping call (David Clarkson).  Among all of those, the only justifiable one was Clarkson's trip because he had to dive to stop a breakaway at any cost.   The others were just avoidable.

Especially the later ones. You'd think after Kovalchuk was tagged for slashing, the rest of the team would figure out that the refs really don't want to let the game out of hand.  All of these minors served to do was to give the Flyers power play a chance to burn New Jersey.  On one hand,  you could say that the Flyers succeeded: 7 power plays across 11:03 with 10 shots allowed and 2 goals conceded. Moreover, those were two excellent goals: the first PPG by Claude Giroux was a deft deflection on a Matt Carle shot right in front of Broduer and the second came off a deflection by a screening Chris Pronger off a Kimmo Timonen shot. They were important as the first PPG sent the Devils down 2-1 in the first period and the second PPG succeeded at killing all of the momentum the Devils raised in the second period while tying the game up at 3 apiece.

On the other hand, the Flyers left a lot to be desired on those power plays.  With 7 power plays taking up a sixth of the whole game, you'd expect a lot more, no?  The Devils had some excellent kills where they just allowed next to nothing to happen. This was followed by the Devils turning that momentum from the kill into their favor.  Basically unless the Flyers scored on their power play, the Devils responded very well after the kill.  Not to mention that the very first power play for Philadelphia of the game saw Zach Parise do this:

Brilliant. You'll see it in the highlights video again, but I don't think you'd mind seeing that again.  Still, the Devils really need to keep their tempers and do a better job on picking up what the refs are and aren't calling. On another night, the Flyers could have easily destroyed the Devils just on the power play alone. Thankfully, the Flyers' power play was inconsistent.

As indicated by the 33-29 shot differential, this was not the defensive battle seen in Game 1.  Both teams' defenses really stood out more for their offensive contributions. I already mentioned the Flyers', but the Devils' D definitely stepped up.  Colin White scored the first Devils goal in the second period that Boucher totally mishandled.  It was his first in 101 playoff games per Tom Gulitti's post, and it was crucial as it tied up the game 2-2.  Andy Greene was able to get down low as Patrik Elias and Ilya Kovalchuk kept the puck moving at the right point, got the puck from Elias in the slot, and one-timed it in on a gorgeous play. 

Those goals didn't just get the Devils back into the game and taking a lead - Greene's power play goal got the Devils going in that second period.  A deluge of offense that was only quelled on Andy Greene's interference call to make it a 3-on-4 killing situation.   Really, the only criticism for both White and Greene were the penalties they took.  Outside of that, I felt they were very strong at both ends.   Sure, the other Devils defenders were fairly solid and had good moments, e.g. Martin Skoula made a huge play late to prevent a scoring chance at 4-3 with a stick check. But the game had a faster, more offensive tempo and so there were more shots.

An additional criticism I'd like to make for the Devils was in how they started the third period.  I know, the second period featured so much going on, so many calls, so many rushes, so many big Martin Brodeur stops, 2 goals scored, forcing Brian Boucher to rob the Devils of anywhere between 1-to-3 goals on scoring chances, and all of it to be deflated with a power play goal against to end it at 3-3.    I can get why there was some early trepidation.  Yet, this is not the time to start periods off with no shots on net within the first 5 minutes.  Again, the Flyers' even strength offense wasn't so great and everyone on New Jersey had their assignments - especially Rob Niedermayer who already looked dumb when he missed Arron Asham in the slot, making his goal quite simple for him to score in the first period.  It's more of a minor criticism as the Devils did play the remaining 15 minutes very well.

Now, let's deviate and talk a bit about Ilya Kovalchuk.   The fans expect much from Kovalchuk and I'm sure he demands even more from himself.  While he's well liked, as evidenced by the giant "KOVALCHUK'S ARMY" banner in section 209, the expectation is for him to be an impact player.  He really had none at first.  I'd say was on his way to having a terrible night.  Here's a summary of his first half:  He forced passes, he attempted low-percentage shots, he had a hand in two breakaways against the Devils, and kept going outside with the puck, putting him in poor positions to make smart plays.  That's not to mention the two penalties he took.  

Amazingly, after the slashing call he took - a dumb reactionary move out of anger on Honorless Captain Mike Richards - he started playing much better. It was as if the penalty allowed him to channel his anger into being an ice-cold winger.  He started focusing and made better and more complete passes.  That's how he set up two goals, actually. Had he played like he did in the first period,   He still ended up with only two shots on net, two blocked, and three missed; but he was far more in sync in the second half of the game.   The empty net goal was sweet not just because it iced the game, rather he carried the puck up, stopped at the red line, saw a lane, and fired it in.   I hope he doesn't need to get angry and take a needless minor to get going in future games.

There were a few other players of note who did have more complete games: Patrik Elias and Dainius Zubrus looked great with Parise. They attacked poor Oskars Bartulis and Ryan Parent - why did Peter Laviolette have two rookie defensemen out there in the third period of a tied game, I'll never know - relentlessly down low before getting into the slot for the game-winning goal.  Elias racked up 3 assists and looked fantastic next to Parise on the penalty kill.  Zubrus had a big role on the game-winner and not just for deflecting it in. His size really helped open up the cycling down low against a Philly defense that wasn't so strong there tonight.    If Jacques Lemaire wants to swap Elias with Travis Zajac, fine; but please keep Zubrus across Parise.  He really does play a sizable role considering Parise's strengths.

Surprisingly, the captain Jamie Langenbrunner had 5 shots on net.  I thought he wasn't noticeable early, likely a by-product of Kovalchuk playing so poorly with the puck.  He ended up getting involved far more than some may have noticed. This is good for his confidence, at least.  Speaking of confidence, how about Matthew Corrente on the fourth line as a winger?  He played 5:14 and one excellent shot in the slot that Boucher had to make a tough stop on.  He was OK when he was out there, nothing terribly special; but maybe we'll see him in Game 3.

Overall, one would have to conclude that the Devils were the better team: 33-29 shot differential, 24-18 in 5-on-5 hockey, 4 goals on Boucher, a power play goal out of three opportunities, a shorthanded goal early, Martin Brodeur came up with some big saves to keep the Devils in it whilst only being beaten on shots that most would have struggled with, and, of course, the win.  If only the Devils didn't take so many calls, then I wonder whether the Devils would have won in a more decisive fashion.

All the same, the sellout crowd at the Rock, a vast majority of Devils fans, have every reason to feel good forward.  Now, can they improve on their discipline while maintaining their "swagger" on offense? That's the big question for Game 3. In the meantime, be glad.  Thanks for reading. Big thanks to Steve for the GameThread as well as all who commented and read it.  Please leave all your thoughts, questions, concerns, corrections, complaints, compliments, and other feelings about tonight's win in the comments. In closing, here are the highlights from NHL.com:

Comment 35 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Warning

The highlights video is filled with amazing highlights and shots of the Devils-dominant crowd at the Rock.

Figured I’d give you all a heads up.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Apr 17, 2010 1:21 AM EDT reply actions  

The highlights clip gave me this stupid little grin that I can’t seem to wipe off my face.

by Jago on Apr 17, 2010 3:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

Defense.

Defense needs to clear the front of the net, honestly, its the playoffs, u cant let anyone stand in front, but (from the highlights) White seemed to get the picture. And i love how our defense is contributing offensively, white gettin his second goal in the playoffs in however many(alot). besides that i hope we can continue the success, start being a little more aggressive when a orange jersey is in front of your net, and go to philly and bust some philly a$$

by Maciek1o13 on Apr 17, 2010 3:08 AM EDT reply actions  

The thing is making the smart defensive move

The Skoula play on the Giroux goal, Martin would’ve been much better off if he had tied up Giroux’s stick as opposed to giving him a small love tap. The stick is the dangerous part of a hockey player, so lift it up with yours when the shot is coming. Giroux never tips it and it never winds up in the net if Skoula ties up the stick. In the old days, a Stevens or Daneyko would’ve just crosschecked him onto his face, but this is the new NHL and you need to be stick savvy.

The other thing is that Skoula also didn’t turn to look behind him. He got way too puck focused on the Asham goal. Skoula did a lot of things right tonight, but those were some pretty big mistakes. And honestly, there’s not much you can do about the Pronger power play goal other than stepping out in front of him and trying to block the shot, which Mottau could’ve done, but then there was the chance of a two-on-none down low if he stepped up that high because it was a 4 on 3 power play.

As for the offense, I loved the Devils cycle tonight. They worked the boards better than in a lot of games in 2010. While so much of the focus is on Kovalchuk, the Parise, Elias and Zubrus line was remarkable tonight. Just absolutely special. Elias was beautiful with the puck, Parise was at his relentless best and Zubrus did what he always does and that’s control the boards.

BTW, I’m not sure I ever realize just how good Giroux actually is until seeing him more consistently. He reminds me a lot of Parise in his dogged determination to have the puck. He’s one of those players that you have to admire, even if he’s killing your team.

Oh and Mike Richards is still a vagina. That is all.

by Tyler Bleszinski on Apr 17, 2010 3:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

In retrospect, I probably should put some commentary on the Pronger goal in the recap so here it is.

One complaint I heard from several Devils fans after the game was how Pronger was able to screen Brodeur prior to his deflection goal. In my opinion, there was zero the Devils could have done about Pronger on the 3-on-4 kill. For starters, the three players out there were Colin White, Mike Mottau, and Rob Niedermayer. Just as the Flyers did on their 3-on-4 kill; the Devils had to stay in a small triangle around the slot to cover the shooting and passing lanes down low.

The only one of those three players who could probably physically move Pronger with force was White – who already took an interference call already – and if he went away from the guys in front of him passing the puck, it gives them more space, a free shot on net, and an even bigger screen on Marty with two guys in his way instead of just one. If this was a 4-on-5 kill, then perhaps the Devils could have done a little more; but the 3-on-4 kill featured so much space that the killers have to focus on where the puck is – not who’s behind them.

The real corrective action should be to avoid taking the penalty. I know Chere thinks it was more accurate but Greene needed to be more aware.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Apr 17, 2010 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

The real corrective action should be to avoid taking the penalty.

That’s what you call treating the problem and not the symptom, and I completely agree.

by elesias on Apr 17, 2010 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

From Puck Daddy's Stars of the night post

Dishonorable Mention: Andy Sutton’s(notes) hit on Jordan Leopold(notes) was ugly, but clean. His post game spat with a Pittsburgh reporter was quite funny … It took a goal with 4:04 to play from Dainius Zubrus(notes) to snap a 3-3 tie and help New Jersey bounce back against Philadelphia with a 5-3 win. Patrick Elias recorded three assists, while Ilya Kovalchuk(notes) scored the empty net insurance marker and added two helpers.

How dishonorable.. Bad Elias and Kovalchuk for getting three points!! Bad Zubrus for scoring the game winning goal in an incredibly exciting game… seriously, you three should know better than this.. you’re in the NHL.. pretty dishonorable.

by Jago on Apr 17, 2010 3:21 AM EDT reply actions  

This will be fixed

I let Sean Leahy know and it was a typo. He’ll fix it shortly.

Thanks!

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Apr 17, 2010 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Great game. I really liked Kovy’s intensity even though Lemaire kind of outed him in the post game press conference for taking the penalty. I dont like how Lemaire CONTINTUES to switch lines constantly. Could this explain why our offense has been so topsy turvy and up and down all year, even with a single game be so inconsistent? I know he didnt stick to it all game, but I believe Game 1 was the first time ever Langenbrunner was on the third line. Thats just silly, he is be fire plug for the team, he is our captain, he shouldnt be there, and I dont think Zubrus should ever be on a fourth line either. But in any case, Leamair juggles a LOT. Chico said in postgame he thinks lines are now set, but he also said that three or four times before the end of the year as well. I think the Devils are the more talented team, if they can get enough offense they will win the series. Its in the Devils hands now; they will win it with getting enough offense or they will loose it by not getting enough.

by max16s on Apr 17, 2010 3:26 AM EDT reply actions  

Keep in mind though that by sending a talented player to the fourth line, it’s not necessarily a demotion… it can be taken positively, as Lemaire trusts that player to pull the fourth line up even more. As for the offensive lines, I think the offense was there in Game 1. They had plenty of strong chances, but just failed to capitalize/finish. The way it stands, thanks in part to all the line switching Lemaire did in the regular season, I’d honestly say you could mix 9 or 10 of the top forwards and there wouldn’t be any gaping chemistry issues. We’ve seen McAmmond on with Parise. We’ve seen Niedermayer with Kovalchuk. We’ve seen Rolston and Langenbrunner. And we’ve seen Elias and Clarkson. Everything’s a possibility now, which gives Lemaire a lot of freedom during the actual game to adjust the game plan.

by Jago on Apr 17, 2010 3:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with you. I loved Kovy’s intensity also. The slash and elbow were both lame calls. I don’t know who got the elbow on the Flyers. But if your going to make a call like that you could have called ruffing or interference on the flyers player. The puck was no where near the play when he went to check Kovalchuk.

If Kovalchuk can refine that feistyness and keep that intensity. OMG that would be great. Its nice to see a little Claude Lemieux in him.

by NJDOhio on Apr 17, 2010 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

By the way

Boucher deserves a lot of credit tonight. Whereas I thought the Devils mostly just hit him with shots in the first game, he made a lot of great saves tonight where the Devils tested his lateral movement. He made several beauties on Parise alone.

I also thought Marty played a really good game. Maybe his best playoff game in since the shutout against Carolina last year?

by Tyler Bleszinski on Apr 17, 2010 3:31 AM EDT reply actions  

I think Boucher got lucky with some of his lateral moves, especially on Patrik Elias with about…what 5 minutes in the second left? It’s a situation where you’re just going across and hope you get it – and he did.

I think both goalies played well; but I think Brodeur made the more crucial saves. Also, he didn’t bungle any shots like Boucher did on Colin White.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Apr 17, 2010 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wait A Minute John

John, while i agree with you in regard to the Devils taking some stupid penalties, i have to say that there were some questionable calls that were made. namely, the call against green which gave the Flyers the 4-3. The first call against Kovy. yes the the Devils scored a short handed goal but the call was still questionable. Also i thought the call against Clarkson was premature considering the fact that he hit the puck first during that Philly break away.

You’ve already mentioned the questionable no calls.

All in all, the Devils plyed the way that they needed to. Although Kovy wasn’t as effective as Devil fans would have hoped, his contributions were very much needed and welcome.

Don’t take anything away from the Flyers though. Thier regular season may not be as good as the Devils but they are a solid team. Dangerous and fearful they are. We tear Boucher down every chance that we get but the guy has made some brilliant saves. (Ask Elias). They are a formidable opponent and deserve the respect of a playoff team. I conclude that they are an excellent gauge by which the Devils can measure the true limits of thier abilities and winning this series will dd alot for our confidence in the next series.

with that said, i will say that the 2010 Devils in some ways reminded me of the 1995 Devils. This is a GOOD team and we need to get one in Philly, however, two would be great.

Parise was a beast out there. Elias/incredible and Zuburis was a0warrior. I was upset with Marty earlier in the game but he made two unbelievable saves in the third period within 10 seconds of each other. The Devils truly have a stanley cup team.

by LoNJDTechnology on Apr 17, 2010 8:00 AM EDT reply actions  

Skoula

Has been on for 4 of the 5 Flyer goals. True, 3 of those were PP goals, but he needs to make forwards (and Pronger) in deep pay the price. I’m assuming Jacques has him out there on the kill because of his size. Use it.

Secondly, Game 3 should be interesting. The Devils threw everything but the kitchen sink at Boucher tonight and they still only won by one goal (not counting the ENG). The Flyers kepot coming back and were very resilient. Hopefully this was not a one game show from the Devils and that they bring this intensity into Philly.

BTW – I’ll be there with my white Devils’ jersey on (and my Phillies hat).

I have respect for most sports fans with 2 exceptions: NY Ranger fans who grew up in New Jersey, and Dallas Cowboy fans who can't name the capital of Texas.

by Cherno77 on Apr 17, 2010 8:05 AM EDT reply actions  

No, he wasn’t. Skoula was only on the ice for the Asham goal and the Giroux goal – the first PPG for the Flyers. Perhaps he should have gotten in Giroux’s way to prevent him from tipping Carle’s shot; but he was on his man for the Asham goal – Niedermayer lost his, who was Asham.

Skoula was on the ice for Parise’s shorthanded goal and Kovalchuk’s empty netter. So, he was out there for 4 goals – 2 for each team.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Apr 17, 2010 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think he’s including Game 1 also.

by elesias on Apr 17, 2010 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

He was also on for both goals in Game 1, and not for the Zajac goal (and he somehow finished only a -1).

I’m still not sure how I feel about the guy. He’s made some great breakout passes too, and I don’t recall him every taking shifts off, but he does seem to get himself out of position at times.

by elesias on Apr 17, 2010 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oops. He’s absolutely right then. He was on the ice for Pronger’s first PPG – a scrum in front – and he played a big role in the Richards goal.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Apr 17, 2010 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

the refs

some penalties were well deserved others were head scratchers I hope those two guys are doing the games in philly too…Oh I long for the old NHL where you could stand people up at the blue line haha

by centralnj devfan on Apr 17, 2010 9:26 AM EDT reply actions  

The officiating was horrendous last night. It wasn’t just the questionable or outright bad or missed calls, but the timing of the ones they did make. It seemed like every time one team would get some momentum, they’d call a penalty on them.

I don’t like to moan too much about the refs because it’s so cliche for fans to do, especially when my team wins because then it just sounds even worse, but I was really scratching my head on some.

The Kovalchuk elbow was Carcillo skating face first into it. Granted, a player should be in control of his stick and his body at all times, and inadvertent infractions will occur, but that one was one you’d see not get called 99 other times in 100. Even still, I can see the argument for it, as it was early and the refs wanted to send a message about not letting the game get out of hand, though I think there must have been several other infractions they could have better chosen to relay that message.

They completely missed Salvadore (or White?) boarding someone. Seems to me that should have been an easy one to call.

The high stick on Greene was another case of inadvertent positioning while someone skates into it, but what makes it particularly awful is that the only reason his stick was in that position was because he was being hooked/tackled from behind and was trying to keep his balance. If they’re going to call that one, they really should have called the restraining penalty that led up to it also.

The interference on Greene was probably the one that ticked me off the most though. The replay shows him skating to the bench for a change and the Flyer skating right into him. Some times players will use the change to cause some interference, but even if that were the case (which I don’t believe it was), upon replay you can see the ref that makes the call wasn’t even looking at it, he was watching play in the Flyers zone but when he heard/saw the guys fall down out of the corner of his eye he turned his head and immediately raised his hand. He didn’t even see it, he just called it because it might have been a penalty.

Also, I was pretty mad that Van Riemsdyk was allowed to pick Martin in front of the net on their first goal. Over the course of this year I’ve seen more and more teams (led by Detroit, who are masters at it) using picks to create space, but in my mind that’s textbook interference. Apparently the league sees it differently.

by elesias on Apr 17, 2010 9:34 AM EDT reply actions  

I don’t know what you were seeing, but the officiating wasn’t horrendous….

….it was much, much, much worse than that. From where I was sitting last night (three rows behind the goal Marty defended in periods #1 and #3), I couldn’t tell which was louder: the booing for the Flyers (not so bad right where I was considering I had several Flyers fans right around me), or the booing for the referees. You know it is rather one-sided when the Flyers fans in my neighborhood stopped complaining about the officiating by the end of the first period because they could tell it was a little questionable…. and they weren’t exactly shy about sharing their opinions before then. I know the refs have to make calls in a split-second without the benefit of replay, but even I couldn’t explain some of them.

The Clarkson tripping minor that led to a goal had to be one of the worst calls I’ve ever seen in an NHL game. I know the men in stripes didn’t have the advantage of my point of view (from behind Marty), but Clarkson had the puck swatted out of there long before Asham fell over him…. I suppose the call was partially Clarkson’s reputation for less-than-clean play, and partially the Devils already being on the PP. I didn’t see the White boarding call very well live (far end of the rink), but the replays show that’s the short of hit the NHL has made a point of targetting this year. Should have been a call.

Not to take away from an absolutely electric atmosphere, or a win the Devils desperately needed…. but they aren’t too likely to win a series if they play like they did last night. There were large chunks of the game where they allowed to Flyers to pin them down and dictate all the play, especially the first half of the third period where they didn’t have a shot for at least eight minutes. They’re still playing too much dump-and-chase, which the Flyers will give them all series. And they won’t win the series if it is played too long on special teams — the Devils PK hasn’t been good enough to deal with that talented Flyers PP.

At least they’re being smarter about moving around the puck in the offensive zone and their shot selection at times. I give Langenbrunner tons of credit for setting up Colin White’s goal, the way he walked the blue line and got the Flyers’ defenders to commit themselves before rifling a shot. He didn’t get an assist, but that’s the sort of play that stood out in my mind and the team needs more of. The Greene goal was a thing of beauty…. even if I had to wait for a chance to watch replays in slow-motion after I got home to figure out exactly what happened there!

Better an ugly win than a pretty loss, but I think there’s a lot of cause for concern.

by acasser on Apr 17, 2010 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

You know it is rather one-sided when the Flyers fans in my neighborhood stopped complaining about the officiating by the end of the first period because they could tell it was a little questionable

Ha!

Regarding the Clarkson penalty, I disagreed with it, and it probably shouldn’t have been called considering the circumstances of the game, but I can’t really complain about that one (which is why I didn’t include it in my little rant). He hit the puck and his skates at about the same time, so it could have gone either way (and should have gone the other). Of course, at full speed and live, it clearly looked like he hit the puck first, but I don’t know how much of that was my Devils colored glasses or my viewing angle compared to the ref’s.

by elesias on Apr 17, 2010 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, and I love love love the new nickname for Richards.

I shall also from here on out call him Honorless Captain.

by elesias on Apr 17, 2010 9:36 AM EDT reply actions  

Is there something specific that led to this Nickname?

Was it for backing off a fight with Kovalchuk?

by NJDOhio on Apr 17, 2010 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

I thought it was a combination of a bunch of plays by Richards last night, including the one you mentioned. He also felt the insistent need to shove his hands in Parise’s face regardless of whether the play was dead or not. There’s a difference between playing hard and physical on the ice, and throwing in cheap shots at the end of a play when the opposition is already down on the ice. Richard’s was trying to send a message to the Devils, yet the only thing I got out of it was that he’s a good but dirty player.

"We aim above the mark to hit the mark." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson

by Tim G on Apr 17, 2010 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

From the Recap
Mike Richards punching Parise in the head after a whistle during the Devils 4-on-3 power play in front of the ref without any kind of call.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Apr 17, 2010 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

I was poking around NHL.com stat page and saw that Elias has won 18 of 35 faceoffs. Which is 51.4%. Zajac is at 58.8%. Nieds and McAmmond are both at or above 50% too.

Faceoffs was one thing that worried me going into the playoffs. Hopefully they can keep up their success.

by C.J. Richey on Apr 17, 2010 12:42 PM EDT reply actions  

Elias has been great on FOs the last 5 or 6 games, which is great because getting possession right away is always important. I was actually surprised to the Flyers win the FO battle 34-30 tonight. I have never seen a team be called off the dot as much as the Flyers do. I think they had 7 players take faceoff (3 players took 4 FOs going 3 for 4), whereas the Devils only had 5 players (Jamie went 0 for 1). That may explain the FO battle.

by Matthew Ventolo on Apr 17, 2010 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have an idea...

Bench Neidermayer for Pando tomorrow. Neids has been nothing but weak this whole recently and I think Pando just keeps getting a bum rap.

I saw several poor clearing attempts by him last night, very little energy, very little checking, very little heart. It just kills me!

by Marty 4 Prez on Apr 17, 2010 2:24 PM EDT reply actions  

I disagree

The Devils should not go to three centers in the middle of a series.

Niedermayer can sort it out.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Apr 17, 2010 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

It would require some shuffling no doubt, but we’ve got enough centers when you think about it….

Elias
Zajac
Zuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuubrus
McAmmond

by Marty 4 Prez on Apr 17, 2010 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m not fond of Niedermeyer, either…. but you can’t disrupt the lines that worked so well in Game 2 just to be rid of him. If you move Zubrus to center the third line, what happens to the second line? Do you stick Clarkson in there? Do you drop Langenbrunner there and put Clarkson with Kovalchuk-Zajac? (That one might actually work, if only to use Clarkson as Kovalchuk’s rottweiler)

Past that, I don’t really want to see Pandolfo in there, right now. I think he’d be a liability against Philly, having lost a step and not being ideal for the physical game the Flyers will play.

What I would like to see is Pelley back in the lineup.

by acasser on Apr 17, 2010 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

I do not see anything positive in Neidermayer. It is driving me crazy that McAmmond is getting less PT then Neidermayer

by NJDOhio on Apr 17, 2010 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not sure which one of White’s interference penalties it was, but he checked the Flyer in front of the net right as the puck was coming through them. Really bogus in my opinion. If you can’t hit someone as the puck arrives at the two of you, when can you?

Go Jets
Go Devils

by FrankG929 on Apr 17, 2010 9:13 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the New Jersey Devils! New here? Check out the Rules and Guidelines before posting.

FanPosts

joomla visitors

Managers

Stanley_cup_and_you_-_sbn_small John Fischer

Authors

Puddy_small Tom Stivali

Marty_sbetter_small Matthew Ventolo

Trollvalchuk_small Kevin Sellathamby

Rex_ryan--300x300_small Josh Weinstein

1729_small Matt Evans SNC