ILWT Audition: What Exactly is Wrong with the New Jersey Devils?
Over a week ago, I put out the call looking for new writers for In Lou We Trust to write about the New Jersey Devils. I've opened up the audition to the community at large in order to get a new perspectives and additional voices on the front page with regularity. Since then, I've received seven entries and I thank each one of them - you know who you are - for stepping up and making an entry.
Throughout this week, I will post each one under an anonymous name so you can discuss and critique the post without regard to who actually wrote it. I can ensure you that I did not change any of the content outside of formatting it in to the SBN platform and fixing spelling errors. To that end, please note that I don't necessarily agree with what the posts actually say. I'm just letting them stand on their own. Please be constructive in any criticism and do offer your thoughts about whether you liked the post in addition to discussing it's content.
The first entrant comes from Writer A user mpavlic, who has an opinion piece about what's wrong with the New Jersey Devils. It's a general piece about the team's problems. While it's not a new topic, it certainly is important because a proper solution can't be had if the problems aren't clearly defined. How can we say we like or do not like the hiring of a coach or signing of a player if we aren't sure what problems they may solve (or what problems they may create)? I hope you appreciate it. mpvalic's piece follows after the jump.
This is a question that has been asked with increasing frequency in the last few years. Fans, blogs, beat writers, and even the team itself have been looking for answers to the problems that seem to have been plaguing the Devils for the past few seasons. Surely a team that prides itself on winning and competing for the Stanley Cup every season will look for answers when it has not been able to make it out of the first round of the Stanley Cup playoffs for 3 consecutive seasons. Every fan on every blog also seem to have their own reason as to the failures of the team in the playoffs in recent years. Some of the suggestions seem to have merit while others are surely stated to initiate an argument. Here, I'll take what I hope is an objective look at the problems plaguing the New Jersey Devils in the past few years including this past season. I offer my opinion on the problems surrounding the team and not solutions to the problems.
I'd like to start by taking a look at what I believe is one of the biggest issues surrounding the team in recent seasons; the lack of coaching stability. Any Devils fan knows that the coaching position for the team in the last 10 years has been about as stable as the New Orleans Levees. We've also heard all of the various reasons for this lack of stability. Let's look at these one at a time. Pat Burns was diagnosed with cancer and had to leave the team. This is completely understandable and no one can blame anyone for this unfortunate event. Larry Robinson was said to have left the team because he could not deal with the stress of coaching. This is understandable albeit a little strange. Clearly Robinson coached and played in the NHL before and had dealt with the level of competition he was experiencing. However, for the sake of argument, we'll give him the benefit of the doubt here.
Claude Julien was fired with only a few games left in the season while I believe the team was in first place. This was a move that I believe has been haunting the team since it happened. The stories of "he lost the room, or the respect of the players" have been heard by all of us. However when Lou fired Julien and took over behind the bench, we knew this would happen. If you want to fire a coach that's fine, but if you let a coach go the whole season (minus a few games), then you let the coach finish. Basically Lou made an extreme decision and it didn't pay off. Julien, in my opinion, could not have done any worse than Lou by that point, and should have been allowed to finish the season.
Ah, Brent Sutter. The favorite coach of Devils fans to hate on before the end of this season. When Sutter came to the Devils he was a rookie coach (at the NHL level) and brought a new attitude to the team. Unfortunately the Devils were unable to come together in the playoffs to perform at a level equal to their regular season success during Sutter's time in NJ. The Devils were to lose in the first round in both of Sutter's seasons in NJ including the now (in my mind anyway) infamous "worst playoff collapse in NJ Devils History" (yes, in my opinion worse than 2001) Carolina 80 seconds mess that will forever haunt Devils fans everywhere. At the end of the 2008-2009 season, Sutter left the Devils to become the head coach of the Calgary Flames leaving the team again, without a coach.
In the summer of 2009, Lou went back to the glories of Devils past, as he so often does, and got Jacques Lemaire to return (more than a decade later) as the head coach. There were mixed reactions among the fans and press as to whether the man who brought the first Stanley Cup to NJ could bring more success to the team or if his old school style would hamper the new found offense brought out during Sutter's time in NJ. The team (as it did with Sutter) was able to deal with massive injuries during the regular season and at one point was competing for 1st place overall in the NHL. After New Year's the team went downhill but still managed to finish 2nd overall in the Eastern Conference. However we all know how the season ended; another first round failure and another need for a new head coach.
The next question that has been brought up has been the leadership of the team. Is there a lack of quality leadership on the Devils? Let me first put this out there. We as fans, can never know what goes on in the locker room. Therefore any ideas or theories that we put out there are based on only what we DO know; quotes in the press, performance on the ice, etc. That is the best we can hope to do. It is with that knowledge, that I would like to look at the leadership question.
First I feel a need to address the issue of Scott Stevens. Many fans have compared Langenbrunner to Stevens. "Stevens would never allow this", "Stevens would never allow that." That may very well be true. But it needs to be said and understood; there was only one Scott Stevens, and he doesn't play anymore. People need to realize that and move on. With that being said, do I think there is an issue with the current leadership on the team? Yes I do.
Let's try to take a look at facts if we can. In the 3 seasons that Jamie has been the captain of the Devils they have not made it out of the first round. Does the blame fall solely on him? Of course it doesn't. Is it a reflection on his ability to take charge of the team and "lead" them to victory, if only even a small reflection? Yes, it is. Jamie did come back from knee surgery last season to finish the series, however that effort has been completely voided out by his behavior late this season and in the playoffs. I agree with Jamie 100% that not being told he would not play in Carolina was wrong. He should have been told in advance that he would not be playing. However make no mistake, this in no way shape or form gives him the right to act the way he did. Saying "no comment" to the press when asked if there is an issue is just as bad as admitting there is an issue. He had every right to be upset but as the captain of the team, he is expected to lead and set an example for the rest of the team, and quite frankly, no worse of an example could have been set. It clearly affected his game on the ice as he did not produce over the last month of the regular season or the playoffs. The bottom line is that Jamie has not exhibited the qualities of a good leader and this has become an issue with the team.
The last issue that I would like to discuss (I have to stop somewhere as there is not enough time to address all of the problems) is the lack of a true #2 Center (or #1 according to who you ask) and a #1 Defenseman. Many people have said that the Devils never replaced Scott Gomez or Brian Rafalski. I have to say that I agree with both of these statements. Please note, I'm not saying the Devils should have paid or done whatever they needed to in order to keep both of those players. That's a different question. However I do not believe they have ever replaced those players. Rafalski went on to have success with Detroit and the Devils have been left with Paul Martin who, while a great player, is not a #1 defenseman. Gomez has been "replaced" by Travis Zajac. Zajac is a player who is great one day and invisible the next. While I believe he fill the whole left by Gomez, I believe consistency is his biggest issue. Solid start to the season, invisible come playoff time.
How are the Devils to fix these issues? Honestly, I don't know. If I did, I'd more likely be the GM of an NHL team as opposed to a fan writing a blog that I will hope get me chosen to write for the on a long term basis. The issues above are just a portion of the issues that surround the Devils. Whether or not to resign players such as Martin or Kovalchuk, the inevitable retirement of Martin Brodeur, horrible signings by Lou, etc. are just a few of the many additional problems the Devils have. While we have no idea what the future will bring for the team, at least we can see a what some of the issues are that have New Jersey in the situation they are in right now.
Editor note: The above was written by user mpavlic. What do you think of the post? Do you agree with the problems presented? If not, what don't you agree with? What would you do to solve them? What would have made this a better post, or what did you notice that wasn't quite right? Please leave your thoughts in the comments and remember - be constructive, not destructive.
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Very nice article. Agreed with most of it.
We need to find a stable coach, but sometimes stable coaches aren’t good. Look at Lindy Ruff. A hell of a coach, but has never tasted out of the Cup.
We need another second liner, but I feel the hole left by Ralfaski doesn’t have to be filled.
Good post, though!
by Marty's Better #30 on Jun 7, 2010 5:19 PM EDT reply actions
Great job. I agree with alot of this stuff.
Cheers, Complaints, homerism and bashing of mediocre pop musicians in 140 Characters
"DO NOT get stuck behind Kyle Wellwood in the buffet line. This isn't really etiquette, but it will prevent you from starving to death"- Down Goes Brown on Etiquette for Jason Spezza's wedding
by Kevin Sellathamby on Jun 7, 2010 5:20 PM EDT reply actions
What Exactly is Wrong with the New Jersey Devils?
The writer has given an excellent summary and opinion as to what exactly is wrong with the NJ Devils. From an historical perspective it is “spot on”, well thought out and thought provoking. I enjoyed it very much and would like to hear what the writer feels might be the solutions to what’s wrong in a future blog.
Soulds like a real fan who konws the NJ Devil history surrounding the problems in the Devils’ locker room, on the ice and even possbily with the front office management without being too emotional as most fans are when they blog.
Would love to read more regarding the writer’s thoughts on what lies ahead for the Devils in future posts..
Quick hits of (hopefully) constructive criticism before delving deeper later:
Claude Julien was fired with only a few games left in the season while I believe the team was in first place.
Perhaps it’s just a pet peeve of mine and no one else will agree, but if you’re going to go to the trouble of writing a lengthy piece, do the research even on little things like this.
The piece is well written and is seeking to create discussion, but doesn’t really create anything new to talk about. These topics have all been talked about before, ad nauseum.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -Mark Twain (?)
I agree
The best part of ILWT is all the research behind the posts. That said, it’s better written than anything I could do.
Exactly. It seems like there is very little facts presented here in this piece. While the ideas are well thought out and commented on, it is mostly opinion instead of analysis or fact.
While theres nothing wrong with an opinion piece, I think a lot of ILWT articles deal with stats and facts than with personal opinion. When there is personal opinion, it is backed up by facts. I feel that the writer did not present enough facts to support any of his statements.
For example, He tried to relate Playoff failures with coaches fired/leaving, but did not really back it up with facts. Is it conjecture? or just circumstantial evidence? The issue with the leadership could be a reason, but that happened in the last game of the season. The problems with the teams started after the x-mas break. The Devils needing a #2 center is true, but saying that Paul Martin is not a #1 d-man is opinion at best. Does he have any proof that Paul is not a #1 d-man? He sure plays #1 d-man minutes.
Keep in mind I’m just being objective here. I agreed with most of what he said in the article. But I think it needs to go into detail the coaching style of each coach, the reason for each playoff breakdown etc. It is interesting to note that after the lockout the only time we got past the 1st round was with Lou behind the bench. Does that hint at something player related instead of coaching related? The concept was good, now expand on everything.
Wow, great blog.Can tell this is someone who follows the team than a person who likes to hear themselves in this case "type. " I think Rafalski still needs to be replaced. Your never going to find the type of caliber he brought to the table every single night (unless he was injured). Say what you want about Paul Martin but he isn’t the shooter Brian was. Paul is more of a skate up the middle like Rafalski and make plays. Rafalski shot more from the point and in my mind is more successful at it. Now Andy Greene has an excellent chance of being the next “half” of Rafalski. He proved this year that he is capable of scoring 35+ points. Gomez really hasn’t been filled. You can say Zajac but he was on the team with Gomez. You had a Gomez, Zajac one two punch down the middle. Now it is a Zajac, UFA Center one two punch. This was really a great article and I approve of whoever wrote this. Great job.
"Hockey is a sport for white men. Basketball is a sport for black men. Golf is a sport for white men dressed like black pimps."- Tiger Woods
by RolliePollieKovy on Jun 7, 2010 5:33 PM EDT reply actions
I agree with most if not all the problems that were addressed here...
The need for a long tenured coach, a top-2-line center, and a top-4 defender should be solved this off-season. Jamie’s captaincy is under scrutiny and it’s ultimately up the next coach (and probably Lou too) if he continues to wear the ‘C’. I couldn’t agree more with people trying to compare him ts Stevens; It’s unfair to Jamie to think he has to be THAT type of captain.
I agree with elesias that some research would have been good. Though most may know the history and the coaching problems, some readers may not. Maybe addressing exactly how many coaches the Devils have had since 2000. How many times Lou has had to step in? Also, linking other posts/articles/websites strengthens one’s article. The second sentence could have linked a number of articles written by Chere or Gulitti after the season. And IMO, the 2001 season was no way a collapse; they fell one game short of the Cup (I know the series was 3-2, but making the finals and losing game 7 isn’t a collapse).
Great read overall. Let’s hope the Devils do solve these issues right away! Get MacLean, sign Lombardi, re-sign Martin or sign Hamhuis and maybe someone like Kurtis Foster.
I was never good at constructive criticism
But it was well written and kept my interest which I guess is the best thing that can be done for a piece.
Against all odds, against all circumstance were you don't have a shot, you succeed
-Michael Strahan
All you hear about is the past, the past... the past is the !@#$ing past, this is the present.
THIS IS TEMPORARY! A CHAMPIONSHIP IS PERMANENT
-Same as above
I gotta be honest, while it wasn’t poorly written it just felt like fan post. It’s a topic that’s been discussed ad nausea ,so someone else chiming in their 2¢ with out some new angle or twist to the “whats wrong with the Devils” is kind of old hat.
At least it could have been what’s wrong with the devils AND how I’d fix it.
Very good article.
Granted, an issue many of us have talked about before whether it be here or elsewhere in the NHL/Devils blogosphere, but a great take on the problems the Devils are currently dealing with and well-written to boot.
New Jersey Devils and New York Yankees: Thrivin' on the Hate Game since 1982 and 1903, respectively.
A defenseman like Stevens or Pronger
Well, written. I agree that Langs’ captaincy should be questioned by the new coach, but you don’t want to burn bridges right off the bat. I didn’t even think about it, but what are your options? Do we think Parise is to young to assume this role? The Pens and Crosby don’t.
But the biggest thing that has been missing for me from 2004 on is, Scott Stevens. I know that guys like Stevens and Pronger don’t come around often, but the Devils number one nedd is that imposing physical presence. I know Colin White gets a lot of criticism, and I was hoping he would be that guy. Whitey could never have lived up to that, but I not overly disappointed with what his role has become.
Maybe Eckford will take that role? Corrente’s a little smaller. But if the Devils don’t grab a goalie in the 1st round and feel the D are stronger in Round 2 than the centers, then they need to build with a physical, imposing defenseman.
With Marty’s time short and goaltending a question mark down the road – do what they Flyers have done. Build a solid defensive unit and have them protect any goalie well.
I have respect for most sports fans with 2 exceptions: NY Ranger fans who grew up in New Jersey, and Dallas Cowboy fans who can't name the capital of Texas.
Stevens
Scott Stevens was a monster in his own end, especially physically. That being said, I don’t think his physical presence is the only thing the team misses from him.
Scott Stevens was a leader in every sense of the word. He set the tone for the team, and he led by example as well as by his words. He could even lead by example without showing up on the score sheet. Nothing against Langenbrunner or Elias, but neither strikes me as the type of presence Stevens was (in the locker room or on the ice), and you don’t necessarily notice either one when they aren’t scoring.
A lot of guys could come in and provide the physical edge that Scott Stevens did. Maybe not to the degree that our HOFer did, but they could adequately fill that role. Asking for that someone to be a true leader like Stevens is a tall order — captains like that don’t grow on trees.
P.S. It seldom gets mentioned, and doesn’t even show up on most highlights showing it…. but how many people here realize Scott Stevens got the secondary assist by holding the puck in at the point and dumping it into the far corner for Patrick Elias to retrieve?
B as a grade
The article was well thought out, I liked that. However, agreeing with some other posts, research is critical to back up your points. And, even if it was written this way; ‘And while I do not have the space here to offer possible solutions to the NJ Devils problems’, given the opportunity I have several thoughts regarding how to fix them.’ This way, it would sound less like regurgitation and more like a Q & A piece, which is what I think it needs to be. Overall though, a good read.
Issues
As for some solutions, here are my thoughts.
- We absolutely need a stable coach, one that communicates very well with his players, not necessarily a player’s coach, but NOT one that pulled some of the stunts Lemaire did this past season. My choice would be Johnny Mac, with some highly intelligent, and technical associate coaches.
- I agree, NO one is, or can ever be, Scott Stevens, but Langenbrunner is our Captain. That being said, I think Langer does best when he is encouraged and knows exactly what is expected from him. In Dallas, he benefitted from Hitchcock. When he came over from the Stars, he was told exactly what his role would be. He flourished with Pat Burns guiding him. So I think he needs to be pushed harder than most, but never disrespected (like I think Lemaire did when he benched him w/o telling him). I still think Langenbrunner is our Captain, both because he is a very good candidate for the job, and there really is not anyone else on our team that would better fit the role.
- Finally, the lack of a 2nd line Center, or a 1A/1B to go with Zajac. I have a problem thinking Zubrus or Niedermayer work as a 2nd line Center. We REALLY need a point-scoring Center, and Id put Sharp on top of this list. Plekanec would also be great. Either way, we need a Center on line 2 to play with Elias, and to put up 65+ points. We do not have enough of a threat after the Parise line to contend with a ‘shutdown’ team, or a player like Chris Pronger who can focus on Zach.
Lastly, for me, who to sign or not sign on our current roster;
Let Kovalchuk go, unless his demands are within reason (say, $7 mil over 5 years max)
Re-Sign Martin, he is our best option on the Blueline
Sadly, let Pandolfo go (waive him), he won’t be playing and $2.5 mil can help in lots of places Let Peters languish in the Minors, along with Pikkarainen, Murphy, and Skoula, after re-signing them
Re-Sign Mottau, Danis and McAmmond
Offer contracts to Clarkson, Pelley and Fraser
Finally, I’d allow for two spots on the roster for two of Tedenby, Josefson, Corrente and Palmieri with the lean on Josefson to fill 3rd line Center
Let Peters languish in the Minors, along with Pikkarainen, Murphy, and Skoula, after re-signing them
Pikkarainen and Skoula are free agents.
Why would you re-sign either one if you don’t expect them to make a contribution to the big club? Wouldn’t you be better served letting the “kids” play and develop at Albany instead of clogging that roster with NHL depth players?
More than that, why would they possibly re-sign if their role is to “languish in the Minors”? I’m sure Skoula thinks he can fill out a defense corps with a regular job on an NHL roster, and I wouldn’t be surprised if some other team thought he could be a cost-efficient, 3rd-pair D-man. As for Pikkarainen, after his experience in New Jersey, I doubt he’s coming back here…. and maybe not to the NHL at all.
If I recall correctly, Murphy has signed to play in Europe…. so he isn’t an option, either.
Pikks went to another Euro league, Murphy went to Switzerland, Skoula’s a FA,
"Hockey is a sport for white men. Basketball is a sport for black men. Golf is a sport for white men dressed like black pimps."- Tiger Woods
by RolliePollieKovy on Jun 8, 2010 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions
A Devil in Disguise
I actually thought the article was quite well-written. It did not strike me as a fan blogging about their favorite team (which is boring and waste of time), but more of an editorial on the state of the Devils. He used some great examples and gave some unbiased discussion points. Definitely provides something for the reader to ponder and allows for them to open up with their own opinions/commentary. I’d like to see this guy write some more. Either way, nice piece.
what really wrong
lou is an idiot. it seems like he lost his mind after 2003. He decided not to keep rafalski who would have been great with martin. They never replaced neidermayer, gionta or madden which is a problem.
They need a no.1 shutdown defensman, a no.2 center, another winger and a second pair defensman who can quarterback the power play with a big shot and play against scorers.
They also need to get a better checking center and left winger who are physical and gritty.
If they fill the second and 3rd line holes and fix the D they will contend for the cup
Yes. That’s what’s wrong. His idiocy put together a team that dominated for stretches and won the Jennings Trophy and their division while missing key players for long stretches, but their 2nd half of the season woes and playoff collapse is because he’s an idiot.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -Mark Twain (?)
idiocy
the team is not built for the playoffs. they need more depth on defensive, he should have realized that 4 years ago and they need another center badly. They also need a back up goalie. They have 5 guys besides Brodeur with any talent. A goalie alone like Brodeur can carry them to the playoffs and get a good seed but cannot do it himself in the postseason escpecially after playing 77 games in the regular season.
Wow. OK, the needs are fine, but the Devils are a business; first comment is totally uncalled for. Sometimes the management has no or little choice in letting people go and/or replacing them. I’d like to see you, who obviously aren’t an idiot, suggest some reasonable options Lou could have done for each of the non-replacement cases you mentioned. I’d guess you’d find one or two possibilities, but not knowing the financial state of the franchise at the time, although based on this post, having just experienced the lowest attendance levels in 9 seasons, I’d guess the financial picture wasn’t so rosy and his hands were somewhat tied.
Go Jets
Go Devils
Agreed
First of all props to the writer for an all around well written article. Facts are a dime a dozen because they can be researched on the web at any point but a personal option is key to a good article.
As for what is wrong with the Devils, well I agree a lot of the points in the article. Do you really think that this team as is going into the Playoffs had a shot at winning the Cup??? We can all sit there with high hopes and prayer but when it comes down to it there is definitely a lack of desire and leadership on the team. Obviously major player changes have to be made along with some glue (an established coach) is needed to solidify the team.
I’m a business man. Lou and the front office gambled and let go of a couple core players (Rafalski and gomez) and so far their replacements haven’t panned out as planned. A couple bad business decisions and any company will sink…
C as a grade
I don’t want to criticize, but everyone keeps saying it was well-written, while there are grammatical errors and spelling mistakes all over. I agree with the notion that it sounds like a fan post – not the kind of intelligent conversation that I have come to enjoy here.
If I did, I’d more likely be the GM of an NHL team as opposed to a fan writing a blog that I will hope get me chosen to write for the on a long term basis.
Not to be offensive, but this is well-written?

by 


















