Hearing over NHL's Rejection of Ilya Kovalchuk's Contract Set for Wednesday; Links While You Wait
Update: Gulitti got confirmation within the last hour that it'll definitely begin on Wednesday. Apologies for the error.
Judgment day is becoming ever more imminent. At least, with respect to the NHL's rejection of the $102 million, 17 year contract between the New Jersey Devils and Ilya Kovalchuk. According to Tom Gulitti, a report out of Russia claims the arbitration hearing is set for Tuesday Wednesday in Boston. Even if that doesn't come to fruition, the hearing should happen this week as both the NHL and NHLPA agreed to have Richard Bloch act as the arbitrator over this past weekend, per Gulitti.
I don't think there's going to be a whole lot revealed about this case until it actually ends. And that's what really what most people would be interested. As I stated last week, the decision is basically whether the NHL's rejection of the contract will be sustained and Kovalchuk goes back to being an unrestricted free agent (Article 11.6(a)(iii)) or the NHL's rejection will be overruled and the contract is accepted as-is by the league (Article 11.6(a)(v)). The vast majority of the readers here feel that the rejection will be overruled; though given that this is a Devils blog, it shouldn't be any surprise the results would skew in favor of the decision that keeps Kovalchuk in New Jersey.
Nevertheless, I've already posted my own thoughts with citation from the Collective Bargaining Agreement as to whether the deal violates Article 50 (I don't think it does) and what provisions are being followed at this juncture (Article 11.6(a) and not Article 26.13). There really isn't much more to say about this issue. So here are a few links from around the network that you should read while we wait for Bloch's decision:
First, keeping it local, let me tell you all that the Rules & General Guidelines have been updated again. I've added a clarification about the profanity rule. Please read it, as all members of this site regardless of affiliation are subject to these rules. Ignorance of the rules is not a defense for breaking them. Also, since I brought it up, let me highlight again that all of the rules - including ones that govern FanPosts and FanShots - are always on the main page in the left hand column below the SBN drop-down menu of links.
Second, keeping it Kovalchuk-related, Gabe at Behind the Net Hockey has two important posts about where a player is on the ice when he shoots. This first post has examples of where Andrew Brunette, Ilya Kovalchuk, and Chris Pronger have taken their shots on the ice in this past season. This second post takes a stab at estimating shooting talent in the NHL, and finds Kovalchuk to be well beyond the league's average. If nothing else, Kovalchuk's shooting can't be questioned as anything but a positive.
Third, keeping it analytical with respect to the league, Derek Zona at Copper & Blue explains why goons are bad for hockey. In that, over the length of a season, a goon provides such negative value, it could cost your team wins instead of some other depth player in that spot. In retrospect, this may have been why Andrew Peters got bought out this summer.
Fourth, keeping it related to looking at players and figuring out what they can and cannot do well, Japers' Rink's David M. Getz takes a suggestion from Puck Prospectus' Corey Pronman on scouting hockey players, and uses it to score the talents of some of the Washington Capitals.
Fifth, keeping it related to scouting, get an overview of the various European leagues at Puck Worlds. Bruce Peter has summaries of the Czech Extraliga and the Deutsche Eishockey Liga (German league). In the coming days, expect a few more.
Sixth, keeping it related to summaries, Earl Sleek of Battle of California got tipped by Puck Daddy to do the first installment of Mount Puckmore. Basically, it's a project where someone makes their case for the four most important people in the franchise - who would be on a "Mount Rushmore" of their team. Read Sleek's choices at Puck Daddy and start thinking of which three non-Lou Lamoriello people would be on the Devils' "Rushmore." It'll be a little while before it's New Jersey's turn anyway.
Seventh, keeping it related to posts at Battle of California, Rudy Kelly and Megalodon make a bad decision and watched The Love Guru. Warning: Post is filled with profanity, dirty & inappropriate jokes & references, and a movie where the Toronto Maple Leafs won the Stanley Cup. Not a link for the kids or fans of the actual movie as Rudy and Meg tear it apart.
Eighth, take a deep breath and go enjoy the days before the Kovalchuk hearing comes to a conclusion. The Devils will have their second stop of the Jersey Tour in Hoboken this Thursday; we're probably not going to hear about any decision until the end of the week, and the weather appears to be pleasant. Don't just sit here and hit refresh for updates; go and do something.
Please discuss any of these links here (except #1, my ruling on rules are final and not up for debate) or there on those sites. Or even talk about Kovalchuk further, though it's going to be moot soon. Thanks for reading.
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
TG updated his post to say the hearing will be Wednesday in Boston.
by Langer Monk on Aug 2, 2010 10:17 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
rofl
i love it. Eklund said how his sources definitely said how the hearing is tomorrow. As soon as he heard its wednesday he wrote the sources say its Wednesday and that hes looking into it hahaha.
wowzers youre making a mess of my trowsers
way to relate everything john with the counting lmao
Sorry Fisch, I didn’t realize that starring a curse word was prohibidibibidibabido. Noted for future posts :)
As for Mount Devilsmore, obviously the first two go to Scotty Stevens and Marty. After that, I’m a bit torn because there are several good choices. Neids could easily be top 4 (but does his California defection hurt his standing in line), as can Johnny Mac. But there’s also Elias with a strong case, and do we think Zach Parise has made enough of an impact to get on the Sculpture? I could even see an argument for Pepe getting his scowling face put up there. And of course Kenny Daneyko…The choices are too many!
I’ll go with Stevens, Daneyko (edging Neids for sticking with the Devils), Brodeur, and MacLean (edging Elias).
Devils fan for 23 of the 29 years I've been alive. Devils fan until the day I die.
What about Lou? This website is In Lou we Trust and he has been instrumental in turning this franchise into what it is today.
My bad. I read it as 4 most important players.
Devils fan for 23 of the 29 years I've been alive. Devils fan until the day I die.
Its alright, if it was 4 most important players than I would agree with your assessment, but I think Lou has to be in there somewhere.
I think Lou belongs on his own separate “Builders” Mount Rushmore with each of the Devils’ three Stanley Cup Winning coaches (Jacques Lemaire, Larry Robinson and Pat Burns) .
Wheres the funding for that? ha ha
Mathew Barnaby to Lyle Odelein: "Cornelius, as we like to call him, gets under your skin. Planet of the Apes. Look at him. Seriously. He looks like Cornelious."
Odelein to Barnaby: "He should take a look at his wife. She's God-awful to look at."
by RolliePollieKovy on Aug 3, 2010 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions
Admission fees and donations to the Devils players Mount Puckmore go to building a special Mount Puckmore for Lou and the coaches, lol.
In the Championship Plaza? lol
Mathew Barnaby to Lyle Odelein: "Cornelius, as we like to call him, gets under your skin. Planet of the Apes. Look at him. Seriously. He looks like Cornelious."
Odelein to Barnaby: "He should take a look at his wife. She's God-awful to look at."
by RolliePollieKovy on Aug 3, 2010 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions
I think the top3 are easy and obvious. Lou, Marty and Stevens. #4 is where it gets interesting.
Do you give it to Elias? 2 cups, all-time leading scorer
Do you give it to Parise whow ill clearly become NJ leadings corer if he stays here his whole career but has yet to win anything
Do you give it to Niedermayer? Obviously he was almost as big a force as Stevens for us but he did leave for Anehiem.
Do you go with Johnny Mac? The Devs original offensive threat who has now the head coach and been in the organization for a long time
I have two other names to consider:
Claude Lemieux: I don’t about you but I will forever think of him as a classic molded devil and he willed the organization their first cup with his play in the 95 playoffs
Jacque Lemaire: Love him or hate him he resurrected “The Trap” and weather or not the team plays it or not, it’s forever associated with NJ.
by Zelepukin on Aug 3, 2010 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I think you have to put a coach in there.
Jacques got the first cup in NJ (great seeing him happy with the Cup yesterday) and deserves to be in up there with the greats. The GM, key players, and the coach. Thats how I look at it.
Mathew Barnaby to Lyle Odelein: "Cornelius, as we like to call him, gets under your skin. Planet of the Apes. Look at him. Seriously. He looks like Cornelious."
Odelein to Barnaby: "He should take a look at his wife. She's God-awful to look at."
by RolliePollieKovy on Aug 3, 2010 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions
It's not so easy
There needs to be more than one “monument.” Whether we want to believe it or not, the NHL has changed a lot since the first Cup win, and the second and third for that matter.
I don’t know if I can in good faith go for Stevens over Dano. Stevens had the bigger impact on the game itself, but in terms of the team and its style, I have to go for Dano. To me, Lou, Lemaire, Brodeur and Dano go on the “Mount Puckmore.” They are timeless symbols of what the team was while it forming it’s identity in the NHL. They always will be, and nothing can change that.
But the NHL is different now, players remaining with the same team for their career is a rarity now. Is it a requirement for recognition? What about players who leave on uncertain terms and eventually return? Or those that become the face of their organization regardless of success?
These can change, and the monument should also be as such. Maybe an Ice sculpture that is rebuilt each fall with faces that may change from year to year? Of course these do not have to exclude the Puckmore figures.
In the past, maybe late 90s, it is easy to see how that could have been Richer, Lemieux, Chambers and Brylin. Or do you make it Stevens, Dano, Holik and McKay? Why not both? One on either side of Puckmore.
For the 2010 season, MacLean, Brodeur, Parise and Elias? How could you not include an esteemed player returning as HC in the mix, and to me, the others do a fine job in representing the team philosphies of hard work, dedication, and defensive reponsibility.
Next year…who knows? Parise, a couple Ruskies and a Swede? That’s the beauty of the Ice Monument. If doesn’t have to stay the same. It’s clear that the personality of the team is evolving into one of a more new-era hockey club, and to limit oursleves to one monument, one built on old ideals is to limit the evolution that needs to take place.
Thanks for the update John.
Still here. Still reading. Just wanted you to know.
A game of Chess is like a sword fight....you must think first....before you move.
Regarding Rushmore
You know, I’m going to use some of these comments in today’s post.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
An article on MT Rushmore of Devils?
Nice
Mathew Barnaby to Lyle Odelein: "Cornelius, as we like to call him, gets under your skin. Planet of the Apes. Look at him. Seriously. He looks like Cornelious."
Odelein to Barnaby: "He should take a look at his wife. She's God-awful to look at."
by RolliePollieKovy on Aug 3, 2010 7:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Not quite. You’ll see in a few minutes.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
Can't wait
Mathew Barnaby to Lyle Odelein: "Cornelius, as we like to call him, gets under your skin. Planet of the Apes. Look at him. Seriously. He looks like Cornelious."
Odelein to Barnaby: "He should take a look at his wife. She's God-awful to look at."
by RolliePollieKovy on Aug 3, 2010 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions

by 






















