Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Which Players Will Join The 3,000-Hit Club?

2010-2011 Penalty Killing Projection Part 2: The Forwards

In Part 1 of my discussion on the 2010-2011 Devils penalty killing unit, I mentioned that the additions of Henrik Tallinder and Anton Volchenkov should make the defensive unit a much tougher one for opponents to face.  With the Devils utilizing three top penalty killers in Volchenkov, Tallinder and Colin White it should help the Devils make a mediocre penalty killing unit better, right?  If you remember I also mentioned a problem area for the penalty killing unit coming into next season.

The Bad: With the loss of Rob Niedermeyer to the Buffalo Sabres (who was replacing the time John Madden once played on the unit), the buyout/release of Jay Pandolfo and seemingly no interest in bringing back Dean McAmmond, the Devils lose 1/3 of the forwards that significantly contributed on the penalty kill in 2009-2010.

Now this post dovetails with John's earlier post on the different candidates for third line center.  (Read it here if you missed it) John listed out the three options that the Devils had for a third line center and one of the options (however unlikely we thought it was because of the Devils cap situation) that may have to be explored is free agency.   With the way the NHL offseason has progressed there are still a number of quality players looking for jobs and that should be able to be signed for a salary close to the league minimum.   The Devils may have to look into the free agency pool to ensure they have sufficient depth for penalty killing minutes and third line players.  

After the jump I will talk about the internal options the Devils have and address some free agent options that can play on the penalty kill and in either a third or fourth line capacity. 

Star-divide

The chart below shows how the minutes were broken up among the Devils forward penalty killers.  You will immediately notice that the top two players on that list (Niedermayer and Pandolfo) are no longer with the team and Dean McAmmond still remains a free agent.   The four players left available at this time are players currently slotted to play on one of the top two lines. Brian Rolston, could also be playing on a second line depending on whether or not Ilya Kovalchuk remains with the team. 

 Pk21_medium

There are roughly 12 minutes per game for which the forwards are responsible.  I will guesstimate that 2 of those minutes will be eaten up by a mixture of forwards (Zach Parise, Danius Zubrus and others average less than :45 per game).  My focus is to find a way to generate 10 total minutes out of the remaining players who spent significant time on the ice last year and/or speculate on a potential new acquisition.

If we assume all of the main forwards who contributed on the penalty kill return then there is a total of roughly 5 minutes left unaccounted for with the losses of Niedermayer, Pandolfo and McAmmond.  How will this gap be filled?  I think this will require three things happening  (1) one player stepping up in a big way, (2) veterans pitching in to contribute and (3) one or two low risk free agent signings. 

1.  Travis Zajac

Zajac's breakthrough year last season placed him 6th among voters for the Frank J. Selke Trophy (awarded to the league's top defensive forward) along with the highest dGVT rank among forwards last year. Zajac's defensive skills will be necessary for next season as the Devils -barring a major acquisition- will likely look to Zajac to fill the void left by Niedermayer on the penalty kill unit. Why Zajac? A few reasons:

Faceoffs-He was the best faceoff man for the Devils last year (52.9%) and defensive zone faceoffs during the penalty kill are extremely important (as if I needed to say that).

Jason Arnott-The addition of Arnott to the Devils not only gave them the second line center they have needed for three years but it also gave them a player who is used to extensive time on the power play. Averaging 3:24 on the power play last year, I am sure he will be utilized there in some capacity. Considering Zajac's presence as the #1 center option on the PP last year (along with almost 2:00 of ice time) there might not be enough power play minutes to go around. (Once the Kovalchuk situation is resolved I will look at the power play minute distribution) Giving Arnott the first shift on the power play would free up Zajac for one to two additional shifts on the penalty kill.

If Zajac can be utilized for at least 3:15 on the penalty kill (+1:25) the Devils would still be as proficient with the extra attacker and they would still be supporting the penalty kill with a solid player.

2. Three veterans, one shift each. This one is pretty easy to communicate. Patrik Elias, Brian Rolston and Jamie Langenbrunner can play an extra shift each (40 seconds) in order to fill the void on the penalty kill. Each is smart and will avoid the costly mistakes that may occur if the Devils throw one of their younger players into a situation for which they aren't ready.  Also, considering the power play depth the Devils have, I am sure their overall ice time should be similar to last year, as Arnott and possibly Kovalchuk will play heavy minutes there. Their respective point totals might suffer, but as always, preventing goals is just as important as scoring them. 

3. Outside help. If we add a potential extra 1:25 from Zajac and 1:20 from the veterans above the Devils still need to utilize another 2:20 in forward time on the penalty kill.   Noticing a tweet the other day from CapGeek I started looking through the remaining UFAs to see if there was a bargain out there for the Devils.   To filter the list I used the following 5 qualifications:

#1.  Player must have averaged at least 1:00 of time on ice on the penalty kill. (And yes I kept Dean McAmmond in there.  I like Dean and this is my list!)

#2.  I took out some players who would obviously be too much money (Patrick O'Sullivan/Eric Belanger/Lee Stempniak/Frederik Modin), and who the Devils couldn't sign (Jay Pandolfo) and was left with the following list of players.

Pk23_medium

#3.  Obviously that is too big of a selection so I utilized dGVT/GVT to chop the list up some more. (Potulny was also taken off as he will probably command a multi-year deal).   My rationale being that you want a player who is responsible defensively if he is going to play on the New Jersey Devils

#4.  Faceoff percentage: After filtering for players with a 50% or higher percentage I was left with the following five players:  Ryan Johnson, Steve Begin, Wayne Primeau, Richard Park and Jeff Halpern

#5.  Cost.  This player needs to be paid no more than $750K-$900K.  Assuming Primeau or Halpern aren't willing to take that large of a paycut (although it isn't unreasonable in this market that they wouldn't) that leaves us with:

Ryan Johnson, Steve Begin and Richard Park.

Not an outstanding list, is it?   Here is what I would do:

If the Devils can re-sign McAmmond for $500K-$650K, I would say bring him back.   McAmmond can play a shift or two on the penalty kill and play 6-7 minutes a game on the fourth line and is a sufficient short term replacement on the third line should an injury occur.

Since I am not a big fan of Begin or Johnson,  I would look into signing Richard Park for a similar salary to last year’s $750 to cross the Hudson and play in New Jersey.  In addition to having the best CORSI figure of the three, Park can then play at least 2 minutes on the penalty kill (averaging 2:46 shorthanded time on ice per game) giving Zajac a breather or teaming with Zajac on the top forward unit.  While his stats weren't spectacular last season Lighthouse Hockey points to the way he ended the season and speculates that his early season troubles could be related to his linemates. 

In $1.35MM the Devils buy two things:  insurance against players like Adam Henrique, and Jacob Josefson not being able to play effectively on the penalty kill and a third line player in Park who can eat up minutes on the penalty kill and play on the third line with Zubrus as the center and possibly Rolston on the LW.   Park could of course handle faceoff duties when necessary.

Of course signing Park and/or McAmmond does prove problematic with a team that is looking to get younger and is already pushing the limits of the salary cap, but the Devils are built to win now (and the future if Kovalchuk and Parise are signed long term) and if the forwards aren't reinforced with more penalty killing depth you would devalue the additions of Volchenkov and Tallinder and put forwards into positions they aren't used to.

Whether it is Richard Park, Dean McAmmond or someone else the Devils will need to address this gap on their roster.  On a positive side it could be a great individual year for Travis Zajac, who if successful in a top penalty killing role, should receive heavy consideration for the Selke this year.

Now it's your turn.  Do you think the forward depth on the penalty kill is as dire as I make it?  Will the Devils give a younger forward a chance or sign a veteran?  Sound off below!

 

 

Comment 14 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I do think the penalty killing forward chart looks rather grim. Bringing McAmmond back for that purpose specifically would only make sense if he could be signed at the amount you were saying, at or just above the league minimum.

Richard Park would be great to have on the PK. He is better than his stats say, mostly because of how bad the team he’s been on. Plus, he was able to average about 10g and 20a a season and even a couple of SHGs a season.

Hopefully the Devils will just be more potent on the PP and 5-on-5 that it won’t matter if they’re slightly weaker with PK forwards. Or better yet, maybe the added depth on PK defensemen will make up for any loss in PK forwards.

by njdss4 on Aug 28, 2010 8:11 AM EDT reply actions  

I’ve always like Richard Park and thought he’d fit in well on the lower two lines for the Devils.

His age is a factor and he doesn’t bring much offensively, but I think he’d be a good stopgap at 3rd or 4th line Center and PK specialist for a season or two until someone steps up or a better alternative is found.

Playing Devils' advocate since 1982.

by elesias on Aug 28, 2010 10:13 AM EDT reply actions  

i like the park idea as well. i would also give vladimir zharkov PK time – zharkov has basically the perfect skillset for killing penalties, he’s good at forcing turnovers and he’s lightning fast. maclean used him in that role in lowell – there’s no reason why he shouldn’t be killing penalties next season. i don’t think brian rolston will be on this team, so have zharkov replace his time – he’s horrible anyway.

by Triumph44 on Aug 28, 2010 11:53 AM EDT reply actions  

You think Rolston will somehow be moved? How do you figure that? I’d like to see Rolston’s cap hit come off the books (it would single handedly solve NJ’s cap problems) but he would need to waive his NTC and the Devils would have to find someone willing to take him.

by njdss4 on Aug 28, 2010 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t see Rolston being moved, because I think it would be incredibly expensive to make such a move this season. Ask me next off-season, when Rolston has one year left on his contract, and I think the price might come down far enough that it could be accomplished without selling the farm.

As far as suggesting younger kids who might fit in on the PK…. wasn’t Rod Pelley supposed to be “Madden 2.0” when he first showed up in Jersey? While it isn’t fair to put such a weight on the guy, it implies to me that the franchise considers him to have some defensive talent and mindset to work from. If that is true, and wasn’t just Lou blowing smoke up our rear ends, he’s the kind of guy I’d put on the PK. Given how top-heavy the Devils look to be for the upcoming season, I’d just as soon have my 3rd-line and 4th-line guys shouldering the load on the PK. I’d be happy if you could give 18+ minutes per night to each of the top two lines and limit how often they’re out in defensive roles…. this way you can maximize the offense and not leave guys sitting on the bench twiddling their thumbs for extended periods.

by acasser on Aug 28, 2010 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

rolston can be re-entry waived, it’s the best all-around solution to the rolston problem. maybe someone takes him on, maybe new jersey has to work out a deal on the side to get it to happen, but it can happen.

lou was hopeful that pelley would demonstrate that, but pelley has not been able to convince either sutter or lemaire that he’s functional. unless he shows some marked increase in ability, i don’t think he’ll be useful as a penalty killer.

by Triumph44 on Aug 28, 2010 6:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

re-entry waivers

The potential pool of Rolston destinations would certainly expand if re-entry waivers were the avenue by which he were moved, simply based on a reduced cap hit. I’m not sure it makes him any easier to move, however…. you can’t work a trade on re-entry waivers, so the claiming team won’t be able to extract further concessions from NJ in return for taking a contract off their books.

Rather than the question being “What additional enticement will it take to move Rolston to another team?”, it would become “Which team believes Rolston is worth a $2.5 million cap hit (and a $5 million salary)?” I’m not sure the latter works all that well…. small markets might choke on the extra dollars.

Certainly an avenue to explore, but I think a straight trade of some sorts would make it easier to move Rolston.

by acasser on Aug 28, 2010 6:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

re-entry waivers don’t just reduce the cap hit, they reduce the dollars as well. forgotten sean avery’s laughfest over one of his 3 good games last year, when against dallas he scored a few and got some yuks about the fact that dallas paid half his contract? so a team that would take on rolston would take on only half the dollars.

you can work a gentleman’s agreement along the lines of ‘hey, trade us player X you don’t want to pay or use’. so e.g. the islanders could trade us radek martinek for a 7th round pick in 2011.

i think that’s a very strong chance that rolston would go away via re-entry waivers. i do think the macarthur to toronto deal hurts any chance of trading him to toronto for e.g. finger.

by Triumph44 on Aug 28, 2010 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was working under the assumption that it was half the cap hit, but all the salary. I was wrong. (See, I can say it!)

I don’t see any particular reason why Toronto would have been interested in Brian Rolston to begin with. The way I see it, Colorado and Phoenix would make for reasonable landing spots. Both teams are playoff contenders, and both teams could use some scoring on the wing. Both teams might also welcome the veteran leadership he could provide.

by acasser on Aug 28, 2010 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

One problem with re-entry waivers

I believe, they’re not going to be effective until after training camp, which is the deadline for the Devils getting under the cap. If players are assigned to Albany prior to the start of the season, I’d guess bringing them back up through waivers prior to the opening game won’t help.

Go Devils
Go Jets
Like sports betting? Sign up with centsports and do it for free

by FrankG929 on Aug 28, 2010 10:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think you necessarily have to worry about having three centers for the penalty kill. If you have two who are reasonably proficient on draws — enough so that you’ll trust them to take them in the defensive zone — you could get away with a third unit of penalty-killing forwards where neither is a natural center such as a pairing of Elias and Parise.

I could live with someone like Richard Park if the idea is to give them 4th-line minutes in addition to their PK duties. However, I’d be a lot happier if the “kids” could fill the holes on the third and fourth lines in training camp, and then let some of them assume some of the penalty killing duties (even if only a shift or two per game). Right now, we appear to be leaning on a lot of veterans for the PK (Rolston, Langenbrunner, Elias), and they’re not going to be around forever. It would be beneficial to the franchise if there were some replacements handy for that time, as opposed to putting off the issue until there’s no one left to kill penalties.

by acasser on Aug 28, 2010 12:34 PM EDT reply actions  

OK, cancel that. From the CBA:
13.2 The “Playing Season Waiver Period” shall begin on the twelfth (12th) day prior to
the start of the Regular Season and end on the day following the last day of a Club’s
Playing Season. Subject to the provisions of this Article, the rights to the services of a
Player may be Loaned to a club of another league, upon fulfillment of the following
conditions, except when elsewhere expressly prohibited:

(a) Regular Waivers were requested and cleared during the Playing Season
Waiver Period; and

(b) the Player has not played in ten (10) or more NHL Games cumulative
since Regular Waivers on him were last cleared, and more than thirty (30) days
cumulative on an NHL roster have not passed since Regular Waivers on him were last
cleared.

So I suppose technically, Rolston COULD be assigned to Albany on or after September 26, recalled sometime prior to October 8, AND claimed by another team in order for the Devils to get the $2.5M in cap relief. Of course, if they recall him and there are no takers, they’re likely behind the proverbial 8-ball with almost no time left before the season to get under the cap. Pretty big risk IMHO, especially if the rest of the league wants to pay Lou back for stirring the opt with Kovy’s contract.

Go Devils
Go Jets
Like sports betting? Sign up with centsports and do it for free

by FrankG929 on Aug 28, 2010 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

it’s not a risk in that sense. the absolute worst case scenario wrt getting under the cap is that new jersey has to waive both salvador and zubrus and can find no takers for them, so both players end up in the minors. i think this is exceedingly unlikely. lou’s also had all summer to look for possible deals, so i’m not at all worried on that front. like the man says, don’t worry about his cap.

the only risk is that rolston will sulk and will give 10% effort instead of his usual 30%.

by Triumph44 on Aug 29, 2010 12:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the New Jersey Devils! New here? Check out the Rules and Guidelines before posting.
joomla visitors

Managers

Stanley_cup_and_you_-_sbn_small John Fischer

Authors

Puddy_small Tom Stivali

Marty_sbetter_small Matthew Ventolo

Trollvalchuk_small Kevin Sellathamby

Rex_ryan--300x300_small Josh Weinstein

1729_small Matt Evans SNC