The Increased Number of Teams Over the Cap Will Make it Harder for the New Jersey Devils to Dump Salary
CapGeek is a fantastic resource for finding out where teams stand with respect to the salary cap, how each player's contract counts against the cap, and who exactly has some kind of deal with the organization on the roster. One of the great features is that CapGeek actually has an updated table right on the front page that summarizes each team's situation. Today, I noticed something quite shocking: 5 teams are currently over the salary cap ceiling of $59.4 million. Here's a screenshot of that front page feature from this evening:

CapGeek has Ilya Kovalchuk's contract listed for the New Jersey Devils, so that's why they are $2.3 million over the limit. However, I just realized that other teams are also over the cap right now: the Chicago Blackhawks (who were over the cap already on July 1); the Boston Bruins; the Vancouver Canucks; and the Calgary Flames. For now, this is acceptable as the NHL CBA allows for teams to go over the upper limit by 10% before the start of the season. Yet, all five teams will have to make moves to get under the cap.
What's also interesting is how each of these teams all have at least 20 players on the roster. Only Chicago has to deal with the difficult trick of shedding $3.1 million and then add a player to their roster while remaining under $59.4 million by the time the 2010-11 season begins. Still, given that the number of teams using this offseason buffer has increased over time, it's going to be much more difficult for them to dump contracts. Not only are they without a lot of leverage in deals to dump salary, but now they have competition as well.
Perhaps I'm getting to hasty worrying about this. Boston's only over the limit because CapGeek counts Tyler Seguin in their lineup; the Bruins can simply re-assign him back to junior and their problem is solved. Chicago may solve their problems by dumping Cristobal Huet to the minors for a season. Their $4.1 million bonus penalty may not carry over to 2011-12, Marty Turco can go elsewhere, and there may be enough room to bring Huet back. Vancouver and Calgary both have a surplus of defensemen and can get out of this jam by just trading/dumping one of them.
Of course, those are just cold looks at the situation, they may not be feasible for a variety of reasons and so may not be pursued by the team. Huet may not want to go to the minors; the Bruins may intend to keep Seguin up in the NHL; and the Canucks and Flames may not want to let go of some of their defensemen.
Incidentally, if the arbitrator sustains the rejection of Ilya Kovalchuk's contract and Kovalchuk signs elsewhere, then that would be a blessing for the Devils' cap situation. Not only does his $6 million come off the books, which would allow the Devils to have about $3.7 million in cap space for this season; but it'll allow more money for an eventual Zach Parise contract extension sometime in 2010-11. That said, I feel this is unlikely because A) the arbitrator could overrule the rejection and B) even if sustained, the Devils could simply sign Kovalchuk to a different deal. In my mind, Kovalchuk wouldn't have gone through a press conference announcing how he wants to be in New Jersey knowing that the contract could have been rejected by the league unless he really wants to be a Devil. Considering the possibilities of A and B, the Devils will then have to dump salary not just for this season but also with next season in mind in my opinion.
Remember that the Devils don't actually have a third line center right now. They'll have to add salary to fill that spot - even if it is a prospect. Even if the team moves one of their wingers (e.g. Dainius Zubrus) to center the third line, the Devils will still have 12 forwards and be over the cap. Unless the Devils dump only defensemen, another player will have to be called up (which means a cap hit) or signed (which means a cap hit) just to get a full roster.
In any case, what makes the cap issue even more difficult for New Jersey, Boston, Chicago, Vancouver, and Calgary is the decreasing amount of teams underneath the cap floor. The New York Islanders just crawled over the magic $43.4 million floor recently; leaving the Colorado Avalance ($38.4 million) and the Atlanta Thrashers ($40.7 million and only 18 on the roster) as under the floor. Yes, there are 10 other teams with over $9 million in cap space right now. They are definite targets as well, but only Colorado and Atlanta absolutely have to add salary for this coming season. Now that they got 5 suitors who have to dump salary, their leverage just got stronger. They can make demands for certain players. They have to do work, but they don't have to get as creative as the 5 teams currently over the cap.
Notice that I didn't bring up the Philadelphia Flyers, New York Rangers, and Ottawa Senators yet. I included them in my snapshot because they are dangerously close to the cap ceiling right now. Should they want to add cap space to allow for midseason trades and call-ups for injured players, then that's three more parties to the dumping mix. Three parties that actually have some leverage given that they are, in fact, under the cap.
My main point is that with the way things currently stand, it's going to be quite difficult for any team to dump cap space. We will probably see teams demote or waive players rather than just trade them off along with a top prospect or draft pick. Once Richard Bloch makes his ruling, the situation will become clearer. However, should Kovalchuk remain a Devil, the cap situation will become incredibly more difficult for Lou - much more than what it was back on July 19.
I'd like to hear what you think about the situation. Knowing how difficult it'll be for any team to dump salary at this juncture, would Kovalchuk becoming an UFA and signing elsewhere upset you less (assuming it would)? Should Kovalchuk remain a Devil, what moves do you think the Devils should make to get under the cap? (NOTE: Do not suggest trading players with NTCs unless you got a way to give me a unicorn.) Please let me know what you think in the comments. Thanks for reading.
34 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nope. Urbom makes more than the $600k saved by dumping Salvador (assuming no one comes back)
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Aug 7, 2010 12:01 AM EDT up reply actions
With Matt Greene out to start the year Salvador to the Kings could be a small possibility. Otherwise we need someone to owe Lou a big favor to get something done.
salvador+prospect
plus im sure salvador would help out some teams, trade him back to St.louis for a 4th round or something or if a prospect is involved, maybe bryce+prospect for 3rd
PS3: J-CAMPS
I think we’re looking at this all wrong. We should be focused on the following when looking for a dumping ground for Zubrus, Salvador, or whomever you think you can be rid of:
- The receiving team has to have the cap room to fit in the player you want them to take, and the budget to pay them as well. Reasonably self-explanatory, but it will remove some teams from the equation because they might not be able to afford an extra three million or so. Colorado and Atlanta are in the best shape as dumping grounds, because they have to absorb salary to reach the cap floor. Some of the other teams that have eight figures of cap space, however, are not likely targets (Carolina and Phoenix spring to mind, the Islanders, too).
- The receiving team has to have a need for the player in question. A team that already has six or seven defensemen under contract probably won’t be interested in Bryce Salvador unless you sweeten the pot for him — St. Louis is a prime example here, because they have seven if you include Alex Pietrangelo’s entry-level deal.
- The receiving team has to have a sweetener they are interested in, that the Devils would be willing to give up if that is what it takes to get a deal done. Considering the Devils (among others) are in a bind, it becomes a buyer’s market — the receiving team has the possibility of exorting a price they find acceptable, because they’re doing the Devils a favor. If you’re looking to get a mid-round draft pick back for Salvador or Zubrus, what else will you have to give up? Draft picks of your own, especially the first-rounder left over? What if the receiving team wants a prospect like Zharkov or Corrente? (I’ll assume for the sake of discussion that Tedenby and Josefsen are off the table and not even dignify the asking with a comment) Beyond that, will giving up those extra chips handicap the team in making deals down the line? If you have to throw your first-round pick in with a trade to move salary, does that make it impossible to make a deadline acquisition if you need one?
I can’t say I have any easy answers, or even trades to propose. I’m just not familiar enough with the depth charts and farm systems of potential trade partners to know who might have a need for Salvador or Zubrus…. or what they might be willing to tender in return. It isn’t nearly as easy as everyone will make out, however.
ILWT
Thats all we can do.
Devil for Life
by st.pattysdaymassacre26 on Aug 6, 2010 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions
I know Zubrus & Salvidore are the initial players talked about in trades, but I think that they should also consider trying to get Langenbruner to lift his no trade clause. Don’t get me wrong, I like him, I just think he would attract alot of attention. I think alot of teams would like to have a player like him. So you should be able to get something descent in return. They still should try to trade Salvidore & Zubrus as well. That would give them plenty of cap space. They either fill the spots with prospects &/or sign someone or maybe with those three trades you recieve someone you can use. You could put Clarkson on the first line.
Langs isn’t going to lift his NTC. He is the captain and the players respect him.
Devil for Life
by st.pattysdaymassacre26 on Aug 6, 2010 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Plus, his deal is expiring and he’s still a 60-point player. Teams who like him are likely willing to wait until July 1, 2011 when he becomes a UFA.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Aug 7, 2010 12:02 AM EDT up reply actions
Ya but if thats the case than you would think that they would at least move him at the trade deadline to get something for him instead of letting him go for nothing. The Devils just got Arnot with one year left on his contract, who’s to say someone else wouldn’t do the same to aquire Langs.
I know he has a N.T.C. & he is a respected leader. That’s what makes him so valueable(:
A no-trade clause doesn’t make someone valuble, merely harder to move.
There’s no particular point in moving Langenbrunner as opposed to Salvador and Zubrus. For all the players on the roster who are overpaid (e.g., the hockeya artist known as “Rolston”), Jamie is a terrific value for his cap hit. If he puts up another 20-40-60 season and there isn’t a crisis with the captaincy, locker room, or leadership in general, he’s done more than earn his $2.8 mil.
In addition, Jamie has all the motive to put up a huge season (say, 25-50-75) — he might have one big contract left in him, but he’s got to produce this season to demonstrate he’s worth it and maximize his value. I’d rather have that on my team and let him walk at the end of the season than trade it for short-term cap relief and wonder who will fill his myriad of voids.
That is a really good point. I have been a supporter of the “lets move Langers if we really need too” movement, but your argument here has persuaded me. A new coach who will let him retain the captaincy and a contract year? Definitely worth holding on to. Will it really be that hard to move Brian Rolston? There has to be a team out there like Colorado who could see value for him on one of their scoring lines.
All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity.
- Gordie Howe
by Michael Gianetti on Aug 8, 2010 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions
I would certainly consider moving Langenbrunner for the right deal, but I don’t know that “the right deal” is available. That being said, I’m not particularly high on the concept of re-signing him after this season. He’s going to want to get paid, likely more than what he is now (and the team desperately needs the cap space to get Parise and Greene under lock and key after this season). He’s also getting old — any future contract or extension will include that nasty 35+ provision. In addition, the team needs to be turned over to the next generation, with Parise getting the “C” and perhaps Kovalchuk and/or Zajac getting an “A” at some point (but without stripping it from Elias).
Onto the other guy you’ve brought up.
I’ve put forth my opinion in discussion threads to other columns on this site that Brian Rolston has one of the three worst contracts in the NHL right now. He is overpaid for what he’s produced the last three years. He makes a lot of money. He’s old — his contract has the whole 35+ thing to it, so no buyout or burial in the Minors or retirement to get out from under it — and his production is declining. He has a no-trade clause, so moving him to a number of teams could be an obstacle and a bigger one for a team that might acquire him now and wish to move on in the future. He also has multiple years left on his deal, so it isn’t a case of “take a flier and hope for the best” such as Simon Gagne was.
I don’t see how Lou can move Brian Rolston without taking back another problem contract or adding in something substantial to entice a team to take him — and that’s assuming Rolston consents to the deal. It is a lot easier to move Salvador and/or Zubrus, each of whom are younger, don’t get paid as much, and don’t have NTCs to interfere. In Lou We Trust, but moving Rolston without a really one-sided deal or taking back a contract equally as bad might be on par with things that show up in the Bible. Apologies in advance if this atheist has offended someone religious.
wrt to the 5 teams over, all of them have an easy out, besides NJ.
chicago will demote huet to the AHL. boston will put marco sturm on IR. vancouver will put sami salo on IR. i’ve heard that calgary will put daymond langkow on IR. that’s not to take away from your original point that finding salvador a home will not be easy. the good news is that almost all of the top 4 defensemen are now off the market – only mottau, mitchell, and johnsson could plausibly be considered top 4 D, and the latter two have serious health problems that may keep them from playing in the NHL at all.
Those aren’t really easy outs. For Boston, Chicago, and Calgary: putting a player on LTIR is only a temporary fix; the team will need to make moves in-season to clear space. Plus, the union would cry foul if these players were put on LTIR for a whole season when they aren’t being hurt. As for Chicago, I can’t imagine Huet wants to be demoted or that the ownership wants to pay a guy over $5 million just to go to Rockford for a season.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Aug 7, 2010 12:00 AM EDT up reply actions
Huet’s agent has been shopping his client with permission from the Blackhawks. He won’t go to the AHL if there isn’t an NHL taker, he’ll end up in Europe similar to how the Devils expunged Ilkka Pikkarainen last season.
as a follow-up
i think new jersey has to get creative here. they want to get rid of salvador? then how about taking back the contract of jason chimera or sergei samsonov from washington or carolina, respectively. the islanders may be interested in salvador if the devils take back radek martinek.
wrt the other player we get rid of, i think putting brian rolston on re-entry waivers is the best solution. the system we should be playing under maclean should be a hard forecheck system – zubrus is very good at that. rolston, with his aversion to corners or fighting for pucks, is not.
White
Could the Devils be counting on White failing his pre-camp physical due to deteriation of his vision? Force him into retirement and save the money.
No, and that's terrible
White’s eye injury was a few seasons ago. Yet, he keeps playing about 20 minutes a game; surely, the injury hasn’t made him suffer enough to not play.
Hoping for a player to be hurt so he can’t play is also pretty low in general. Of course, the Devils aren’t hoping that he’s injured.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Aug 6, 2010 11:59 PM EDT up reply actions
White is one of our best dmen in my eyes so just on that level i'd say no!
Chip even if that were true we would then need to have someone on the roster to replace him. Even if the player makes minimum salary we would then have 21 players and only 200k worth of cap space. God forbid 2 players get hurt then we wouldn’t have the minimum required players nor the cap space. To be honest i’m not sure who we can move I have said Salvador and Zubrus but I don’t really know. Ugh i wish Rolston didn’t have a ntc, though i’d fret losing him. But as far as trades are concerned i’d certainly try to work with Colorado. I have watched alot of their games and think they have some real good prospects and other pieces. I will end this with a dream scenario Zubrus and Salvador for Cumiskey and Jones. Now i will just have to find John a unicorn.
Or maybe Salvador and Zubrus for Porter and a draft pick. Then we have our 3rd line center and roughly 3.4 million left in cap space. He looked good on the pk and has decent speed. Just glad this is Lou’s issue not mine. No matter what i’m inclined to agree with John it will be hard to make the room we need. Least if we do keep Kovalchuk least we didn’t go over the cap for nothing. Regardless of anything anyone says Kovalchuk was the best forward we had in the playoffs period! Not that Parise and Zubrus didn’t try.
Still Zubrus and Salvador
to me, they are the best candidates to be moved as they are still serviceable to other teams for sure at their salaries. Rolston makes no sense on too many levels, we would have to be either extroadinarily lucky or give up too much to get rid of him.
For a Salvador trade, I had looked to Ottawa being they need a defensive defenseman. But their Cap situation pretty much squashes that. But Atlanta makes sense, they have 6 roster Defenseman including Boris Valabik and can only count on Bogosian (and Valabik) to be a physical guy. Coupled with our clear previous relationship with them thru previous transactions, this just makes sense to me.
For Zubrus, although they have a budget, I say the Islanders is still the best location for him. Yes, he would be the highest salaried forward on the team, but could serve as the team’s Number 2 Center. They lack a true 2C, even when Weight re-signs, and Zubie is versatile enough to play wherever they ask him to, a great trait when playing on an up-and-coming team where ‘new’ players occupy and relinquish spots regularly.
I understand the worry, as I have it as well, in ‘dumping’ salary. But I look to Chicago and see their transactions this summer when it was clear to the entire NHL that Chicago was in dire need to shed salary. They managed to make pretty good ‘hockey’ trades, not just salary dumps. Zubrus and Salvador are still very viable players in the NHL, and I think we as a group, have discounted them a bit because we expect them to be moved. If we did not have salary cap issues and decided to trade Zubrus, we would all expect a great ‘hockey trade’ return, would we not?
Other possible destinations include St Louis, Edmonton (once Souray is moved), Florida (plenty of D, but few established in McCabe, Wideman and Allen), Los Angeles and perhaps Anaheim for Salvador.
Colorado, Montreal and even Washington for Zubrus.
"Don't worry about my Cap." - Lou Lamoriello
I don’t know that the Islanders will add any more salary, and I’m even more skeptical they’d take on another long-term contract. You’re looking at a team in chaos, as there is no concept of where they will be in three years — not as a competitive hockey franchise, mind you, but their geographic location. Unless the Lighthouse Project on Long Island gets miraculously revived, I would not be at all surprised if Charles Wang put the team on the market with the idea that a buyer would move the club. If that is the likely outcome to keep in mind, they will minimize the long-term contracts they sign or acquire, as to make the team more attractive to a potential buyer. Not saying they wouldn’t take Zubrus, but I don’t see why they’d be interested in a guy with three years left on his contract when they might be able to get better offers from other clubs who need to dump salary.
That’s a good point on the length of deals, but I dont see Wang ever selling the team, regardless if they are in LI or not. After being around since 2000 and losing all that money already, selling the team now wouldnt net any profit, so why sell? Hunter has a 5-year contract signed in the midst of this uncertainty, Streit the same, both running thru the same time period as the previously mentioned. But the length sure doesnt help a Franchise in trouble.
A scaled-back Lighthouse Projet still has legs, hopefully for the Franchise, it comes to be.
"Don't worry about my Cap." - Lou Lamoriello
I bet the Isles end up in Queens near Citi Field. The owner of the Mets has interest in making this happen, whether he buys the team or Wang just puts a new building there. Long Island politicians don’t seem to want the team anymore but this way at least they’re still New York.
Players Currently in My Doghouse: Brian Rolston
by thejerseydevil on Aug 8, 2010 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions
Different Take
I for one would not move Zubrus. I know that he doesn’t have a NTC or NMC, but he was one of the few Devils players who played like he wanted to win in the playoffs…where it matters. I also like Salvador, but I wouldn’t mind losing him.
In my dream world we would move White and Rolston, we would have over $5.2 million in cap space and trim some fat. However, as good as Lou is the chances he can move Rolston are slim to none. White on the other hand is great on the PK and is a veteran. He’d be a good mentor to a young d-corp such as Atlanta, Tampa, or LA. Also we have Tallinder and A-train to mentor our guys. I also think that Lou is good enough to get the players he wants to waive their NTCs to waive their NTCs. Nobody wants to be where they aren’t wanted.
I also agree with maliky. Langenbrunner is a good player and is respected. GMs love him and we’l be able to get something in return for him especially if we move White or someone else first. Also its the last year of his contract and I don’t see him coming back next year. The Devils have to resign some key pieces. We are entering a new era of Devils hockey, its time to let go of some of those pieces from the past. Also it will allow Lou to give Parise the C which will show him our commitment to him. Teams would take Langs first for his immediate benefit to the team and second because they’ll have a leg up on signing him next year. If we get rid of Langenbrunner and White we would have $2.94 million in cap space. If we add Corrente and Urbom and get rid of Salmela then we still have over $2.33million in cap space.
Also, on the subject of the third line center, we don’t need to sign anybody. We have two great centers who I think should be given the chance to prove themselves this year in Henrique and Josefson. The last piece to this puzzle is an offensive defenseman which we should definitely try to acquire.
Agreed on multiple points. When nobody else gave a crap last year, Zubrus did. Salvador is good but bottom line, we have two young players in Fraser and Corrente who do the same job, and cheaper. I can’t help but wonder if White has been asked to waive his NTC and he just said no. Captain Crybaby would be an ideal moving target, but he probably won’t want to either. Maybe now with Jacques gone he can at least justify his place on the team and then cough up the ‘C’ next summer.
Players Currently in My Doghouse: Brian Rolston
by thejerseydevil on Aug 8, 2010 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions
If there's anything I've learned over the last few years
Is when it comes to Lou, expect the unexpected. I won’t be surprised if he pulls something out of his @** and does something no one saw coming. I mean seriously, who 6 1/2 months ago thought we’d be discussing having Kovy on our team?
Also a good point
It is a fair assumption that Lou has unknown connections and dealings with other NHL GM’s and it is those relationships that he will use to make this situation work. We can speculate on what he can and can not do based on the findings of Capgeek, but in the end he will have no choice but to make it work. It is obvious that there are players on this team that are considered integral to its success and Lou will do whatever it takes to keep them around.
All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity.
- Gordie Howe
by Michael Gianetti on Aug 8, 2010 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Left Wings
TOO MANY LEFT WINGS! I hope Lou resolves this somehow, I’m getting extremely worried. Every time I try to think of line adjustments for next season I run into Winger problems by placing a left wing on the right. Rolston (who has a large cap hit, is a left wing and is no longer what he used to be) would be nice to move, difficult to do, however still nice. If Lou can’t move him (I have faith that he may have a secret deal pending, or at least some sort of plan for Rolston) I’d be more than ok with the last resort, putting him on waivers.
Although I had no problem arranging centers. Zajac – Arnott – Zubrus (who has proved his ability to play on the 2nd line and should have no problem on the 3rd) – Rod Pelley

by 






















