The Implications of Waiving Brian Rolston
So have you heard? The New Jersey Devils need to clear some payroll to get under the salary cap by October 6th. After officially signing Ilya Kovalchuk to a $100 million/15 year contract, the Devils still have work to do before the season. They are now concentrating on their cap situation. There's been a lot of talk around ILWT about eligible players to clear cap space. John wrote a good summary after Kovalchuk and the Devils signed and submitted their first contract in July. He used next year's cap situation for his reasoning. After the second contract was successfully approved, John posted about the current cap situation and some expectations going forward. It's been clear that Salvador and Zubrus are the top individuals to trade, and it may come at a cost of prospects and draft picks. Yet many fans are fond of seeing Rolston leave, even with his No Trade Clause. Tom weighed the decision of losing Zubrus or Rolston, which has churned up a big debate around these parts.
Dainius Zubrus and Bryce Salvador are good candidates because they don't have any clauses, as opposed to Brian Rolston who would have to waive his NTC (which like many have said has never happened in franchise history) to be moved. Well there is another way to remove a player with a movement clause, and that is through the waiver process. Some have mentioned, including myself, the possibility of placing Rolston on waivers. Well what exactly happens, and is this worth it? I will show the implications if the Devils were to put Rolston on waivers, the separate outcomes from that, and their respected cap and roster situation. All after the jump.
First, let's get some through some of the trivial information. The Devils cap room is $-2,968,332 per CapGeek. They have 21 active players accounted towards the cap: 12 forwards, 7 defensemen, and 2 goaltenders. Rolston's cap hit is $5,062,500 for the next two years, and his salary is $5,000,000 for the next two years. He signed a 35+ contract, which has some major implications pertaining to this post, and has a No Trade Clause for the duration of his contract.
Rolston is capable of being placed on waivers on Saturday, September 25th, which is the first day teams can do exactly that. He fully qualifies as a player who can. If the Devils submit a request before noon on Saturday, the waiver period will end Monday, September 27th. If the Devils submit a request after, it's not processed until Sunday at noon, and waiver period will expire on Tuesday. Any request submitted on a weekday has a 24 waiver period. This is all from Section 13.18 of the CBA.
The two outcomes I will concentrate on first is A) If Rolston get's claimed by another team during the waiver period, and B) If no team claims him and he is assigned to the minor league (Albany Devils). I will then concentrate on if the Devils were to assign him back to the Devils using the re-entry waiver procedure, in which there are two outcomes: C) If Rolston get's claimed by another team during the waiver period, and D) If the re-entry waiver period expires, and Rolston is once again on the Devils.
Option A: Rolston Enters Waivers and is Claimed by Another Team
Brian Rolston is eligible for waivers. He's played in enough games in his career and in the last two seasons that he's fully qualified. During the 48 hour or 24 hours waiver period (depending on when the Devils submit the request), any team in the NHL can claim him. There is a condition to this; the Devils have to approve or reject the request. Here's Section 13.13 (b) of the CBA:
A Player who is placed on Waivers by his Club may request permission from his Club to contact other Clubs during the applicable Waiver period to discuss the Club's level of potential interest in the Player's services. The Club may decline such request in its sole discretion. If such permission is granted, it must be evidenced in writing from the Club, with a copy via facsimile to Central Registry and the NHLPA, all in accordance with Exhibit 3 hereof.
If one NHL team claims Rolston with the approval of the Devils, then that new team would take Rolston, and his contract as is (also in Section 13 of the CBA). If two or more teams claim Rolston, there are conditions (points %) where a team is awarded Roslton. The main thing here is the new team takes Rolston's cap hit at $5,062,500 for the next two years, and his salary at $5,000,000. The Devils would have to pay some waiver fees and other expenses.
The Devils would be clear of Rolston's salary, his cap hit, and would be under the salary cap with $2,094,168 in cap space. They would have 20 roster players (11 forwards, 7 defensemen, and 2 goaltenders). That's plenty of room to acquire up to three more players at 3rd or 4th line center, and some depth players.
I really don't know any team that would want Rolston and his contract for the next two years. He's overpaid, has a No Trade Clause, and is a 35+ year old contract. Basically, no team would want Rolston for the same reasons Devils fans (who knows what the Devils organization feels) don't want him. This isn't going to happen unless a team desperately needs to reach the lower limit. Currently, there is only one team under the lower limit of $43.4 million, the Colorado Avalanche by $113k.
Not only that, but what team would willingly help the Devils taking a high paid contract off their hands? "Here you go New Jersey, we see you're above the salary cap. so we'll take Rolston's contract from you." This is the perfect world scenario, and it's unlikely it will happen.
Option B: Rolston's Waiver Period Expires; Assigned to AHL
If no team claims Rolston during the waiver period, then the Devils can do a number of things. They can release him and buyout his contract. That's just dumb because Rolston is under a 35+ year old contract, and his cap hit would not change. It's a waste of $5,062,500 for the next two years. The Devils would most likely send him to the AHL, the Albany Devils. Beacuse of his 35+ year old contract, the Devils sum of the salary cap will include; CBA Section 50.5 (d) (i) (B) (5):
All Player Salary and Bonuses earned in a League Year by a Player who is in the second or later year of a multi-year SPC which was signed when the Player was age 35 or older (as of June 30 prior to the League Year in which the SPC is to be effective), but which Player is not on the Club's Active Roster, Injured Reserve, Injured Non Roster or Non Roster, and regardless of whether, or where, the Player is playing, except to the extent the Player is playing under his SPC in the minor leagues, in which case only the Player Salary and Bonuses in excess of $100,000 shall count towards the calculation of Averaged Club Salary;
Brian Rolston would be playing in Albany, paying him his regular salary, with the cap hit of $4,962,500. That really doesn't help the Devils clear cap space. $100k is hardly anything for season with a salary cap upper limit of $59.4 million and a minimum contract of $500k. They would lose a player for $100k in cap space. Rolston is worth much more than 20% of a minimum contract. The Devils would be responsible financially for hotel, food, and other accommodations while Rolston is in Albany during the season, however long that may be. This could be the first step for the Devils process of putting Rolston through re-entry waivers, which leads me to the next option.
The next two options are when and if Option B is successful. Option B is a prerequisite of Options C and D. Once Rolston is on the Albany Devils, the Devils may assign him back to the NHL. This is the re-entry waivers procedure. The waiver period has somewhat the same parameters as regular waivers. Here are the two possible outcomes I will discuss.
Option C: Rolston Enters Re-entry Waivers and is Claimed by Another Team
During the re-entry waiver period, other NHL teams can claim him. I am aware of no differences, except for one, between the regular waiver process and the re-entry waiver process. The original team must approve talks between the player, in this case Rolston, and the new team wishing to claim him. The lengths of the period are no different as well. If more than one team claims him during the period, the same rules apply. The main difference is salary cap and cap hit obligation; per the CBA, Section 50.9 (g) (ii):
To the extent the Player does require Waivers to be Loaned to a minor league affiliate, he cannot be Loaned or recalled without first clearing regular Waivers, and then cannot be Recalled to the NHL parent Club during the same League Year without also clearing a new Re-Entry Waiver procedure, pursuant to which the Player can be claimed by another NHL Club for fifty (50) percent of the contract's remaining amounts to be paid, with the balance to
be paid by and charged to the waiving NHL Club (both amounts to be counted against each Club's Upper Limit, Actual Club Salary and Averaged Club Salary, and counted against the Players' Share);
If a team is awarded Rolston during the re-entry waiver period, the Devils and the new team are each responsible for half of Rolston's cap hit (or $2,531,250) and salary (or $2,500,000) for the next two years. The Devils would be paying Rolston half of his remaining contract to play on another team. This wouldn't solve the Devils cap problem this season also. It would put the Devils cap space at $-437,082 with 20 roster players (11 forwards, 7 defensemen, and 2 goaltenders).
Are other NHL teams open to helping the Devils out (not to the severity they will be in Option A)? Is Rolston worth picking up for a $2.531m/2 year contract, with a NTC, and a 35+ contract? Maybe. Maybe not. Maybe every team will pass and let the Devils work another way to clear space. Again, maybe a team will need to reach the lower limit and will claim Rolston. It's possible a young team may want a veteran presence, or a playoff contender wouldn't mind some playoff experience on the team. The bottom line here is the Devils won't really know until they actually do it. It's possible nothing will happen and they are back to square one. It is even worth the Devils time with much left to do with all these "outs"?
The positive implications of this outcome (or series of outcomes considering Option B must happen first) do depend on other circumstances, and on how you personally feel about worth. If the Devils are expecting to make multiple moves, then this keeps from trading a player away with leverage on the deal. The Devils won't be sacrificing prospects and daft picks in order to trade players away. This could save Dainius Zubrus or Bryce Salvador from even getting traded. Since Zubrus' and Salvadors' contracts are $3.4m for 3 more years and $2.9m for 2 more years respectively, is saving $2.531m for 2 years even worth it?
Well it saves a little more than $2.5 million, but it's also costing a little more than $2.5 million for two years. It depends on which way you look at it. It's costing 50% to clear cap space and Brian Rolston's roster spot. It cost Jay Pandolfo 66% to clear cap space and his roster spot when he was released and bought out. Pandolfo is 35 years old whereas Rolston is 37. The cost/savings amounts are about 3x different. But does this sound like a better deal? This is the option realistically the Devils could seemingly want if they were to involve Rolston in the cap space freeing. That is, it's the best possible outcome using Brian Rolston in the equation to be relieved of cap space at no personnel cost (prospects and draft picks).
Option D: Rolston's Re-entry Period Expires; Assigned to NHL
This outcome would conclude that the entire process was a waste of time and money. Brian Rolston is back on the Devils, with the same cap hit and salary, and the Devils cap situation has never changed. The way I see this happening would be if the Devils tried to do Option C and no team felt Rolston at $2.531m/ 2 years was worth claiming him. The Devils would still be in a dire cap situation.
Conclusion
The different options presented each explained the Devils salary cap, the cap space, and it's probability. If the Devils were to go through the waiver process with Brian Rolston, it's clear they intend to put him through re-entry waivers, and get a team to claim him and 50% of his contract. The other two options do absolutely no help to the Devils cap situation, and the other is very unlikely.
Option C does save the Devils some money, but it does have it's risks and cost. Is this a viable option for the Devils? My guess would be if the Devils are having trouble getting any trades completed between now and say, three weeks, then this may be a good option. Maybe teams are asking for 1st and/or 2nd round picks and/or high end prospects like Alexander Urbom and/or Jacob Josefson, and the Devils feel uncomfortable doing this. It's possible the Devils are imposed a penalty by September 17th for the first Kovalchuk contract and the Devils must make 3 or more moves to clear space. Per Tom Gulitti, if a penalty is issued, it will not count under the salary cap (Thanks to FrankG929).
There's a lot of questions that can't be asked until it happens, or other action like a trade occurs. But what do you think? Do you think it's possible that Devils will put Rolston through re-waivers? Is this worth the risk and cost to save prospects and draft picks? Is it worth saving Zubrus or Salvador to a trade? Is Rolston worth more than $2.531m each for the next two years?
29 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Rolston
At this time our best Cap move options are limited to us been able to move Salvador & Zubrus for very little or nothing in return. I do not see the Rolston options since Lou & the Devils having to pay 50% of his salary and having him play for another team. The rumors of moving Langenbrunner to the Leafs are still floating but it makes no sense to me since it will weaken the number one line with Zajac & Parise. It certainly will be interesting to see Lou next chess moves in the next two weeks ?
This is a classic example of "Sunk Costs"
Personally, I think option C would be an excellent outcome for the Devils. Old Puck, you make the point of Lou and co not wanting to pay 50% while he plays for someone else. I think it would be faulty logic if the Devils did not pursue the waiver approach for that reason.
The reality is that we have a bad contract here – a Sunk Cost in economic parlance. Do we want to throw good money after bad? The only perspective we should be looking at this from is how to relieve as much cap dollars as we can and give up as little production as possible in return.
Nobody is going to pick up Rolston for the full $5 million, so let’s relegate that to unicorn land. However, another team might be willilng to take Rolston for a $2.55 million salary and cap hit. That is the bottom line – we can free up $2.55 million in cap space and have to fill a RW position, replacing a guy who has given us an average of just over 30 points on average last two seasons, or based on games played about .48 points per game
What are the alternatives
Lose Zubrus, which gets $850k more in cap relief (at $3.4 million), but we lose a guy who has been slightly over .5 points per game, probably gives more flexibility to play either RW or C, and is 5 years younger.
Lose Salvador, gets us $350k more in cap relief, but is a pretty solid stay at home D type and if he goes, then Devils have turned over fully 1/2 of their primary D last year.
There is also no way that Langenbrunner should even be in the discussion of being moved in my view. Langs is one of the cheapest veterans on the team – it makes no sense to try to move him for the production that the team gets out of him. He has produced almost 2x the points Rolston has over the last 2 seasons. Plus he is up after this year anyway so there is no “annuity” benefit to it.
Bottom line to me is that the loss of Rolston with a $2.55 million cap benefit is the most preferable option of the 3 above, though I would actually say Zubrus is close, just because you are talking about almost $900k more in cap benefit.
by Devilssection21fan on Sep 13, 2010 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions
So solve this equation:
Does the absence of: Rolston’s play + Rolston’s Contract (at $2.53m) = the absence of Zubrus’ Play + Zubrus Contract (at $3.4m) + Picks + Prospects?
So: Rolston’s Play – $870k in cap space this season (and $2.531m next year) = Zubrus’ Play + Picks + Prospects?
Judge the difference between Rolston and Zubrus. (Who’s more valuable?)
What’s your parameter on Picks and Prospects?
In Lou We Trust: SBN Blog of the New Jersey Devils
"Hockey is the only job I know where you get paid to have a nap on the day of the game." - Chico Resch
by Matthew Ventolo on Sep 13, 2010 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions
the reason why many of these equations have been flawed is that value is not linear. assuming an absurd example that’s not so absurd given the players the devils have, let’s imagine a team that has 4 players who can only play left wing, and all 4 are above-average players, but player A is clearly better than B who is better than C who is better than D. well, it’s going to be tough to work guy D into the lineup given normal ice time distributions, no?
there’s also positional importance. the devils don’t need another left wing. they probably don’t need a forward who can play the point. they do, however lack center depth.
I never was any good at calculus or algebra
I don’t think the question you are asking is whether they are equal, I think the question is which is greater (or is it less ?)
Also, can you clarify why you are saying the $2.53 next season? Under a waiver claim, do the Devils only pick up half the salary for one year? Basically I thought that Devils are stuck with that cap hit (kind of like the Pandolfor and Peters buyouts) next year as well.
I think losing Rolston in exchange for $2.5 million in cap space is a better value than losing Roltson + the likely required prospects in exchange for $3.4 million in cap space. Zubrus serves a more important need on this team at this point. If there were no prospects involved it might be closer, but you rightly point out we would probably have to throw someone in.
by Devilssection21fan on Sep 13, 2010 7:31 PM EDT up reply actions
If a team is awarded Rolston during the re-entry waiver period, the Devils and the new team are each responsible for half of Rolston’s cap hit (or $2,531,250) and salary (or $2,500,000) for the next two years. The Devils would be paying Rolston half of his remaining contract to play on another team.
Well by parameters I guess I mean your value of the picks and prospects that would make the equation equal. For instance, If I feel Zubrus’ play equals Rolston’s play (I don’t think this, it’s an example); then the value of draft picks plus the value of prospects equal $870 in cap space. Now that could mean a prospects’ who salary is $870k (Zharkov, Urbom). You may think that a 2nd Round pick and Tim Sestito equal it. It’s whatever you think.
In Lou We Trust: SBN Blog of the New Jersey Devils
"Hockey is the only job I know where you get paid to have a nap on the day of the game." - Chico Resch
by Matthew Ventolo on Sep 13, 2010 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions
One point you have incorrect
According to TG, the penalty that might be imposed does not have any salary cap implications:
It has been reported that, as part of Friday/Saturday’s agreement, the NHL has until 5 p.m. on Friday, Sept. 17 (the day Devils’ veterans report for training camp physicals) to determine if it will penalize the Devils. The maximum fine would be $3 million and the loss of salary cap space has been eliminated as possible penalty, as part of the agreement.
So there wouldn’t necessarily have to be 3 moves made, because without moving Rolston, 2 players with 2.5M+ salaries would have to moved in order to get under the cap.
Go Devils
Go Jets
Like sports betting? Sign up with centsports and do it for free
Updated. Thanks.
I’m beginning to realize how “sketchy” the meetings between the NHL and PA were.
In Lou We Trust: SBN Blog of the New Jersey Devils
"Hockey is the only job I know where you get paid to have a nap on the day of the game." - Chico Resch
by Matthew Ventolo on Sep 12, 2010 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions
How about we take rollie and tell him to stick his foot out and we can break his foot by running over it then place him on the injury reserve :P
by Kyle Hamelin on Sep 12, 2010 3:10 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
As long as you’re next in line behind him for the same treatment.
Go Devils
Go Jets
Like sports betting? Sign up with centsports and do it for free
Thats kind of harsh Hamelin. I’d rather see Rolston and his cap hit then watch him break his entire leg and be miserable.
Mathew Barnaby to Lyle Odelein: "Cornelius, as we like to call him, gets under your skin. Planet of the Apes. Look at him. Seriously. He looks like Cornelious."
Odelein to Barnaby: "He should take a look at his wife. She's God-awful to look at."
by RolliePollieKovy on Sep 12, 2010 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions
wow Americans really don’t have a sense of humor eh? lighten up it’s a joke.
by Kyle Hamelin on Sep 12, 2010 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Well I said I hope Martin breaks his arm again when he signed with the Pens and I got hit hard so…
Mathew Barnaby to Lyle Odelein: "Cornelius, as we like to call him, gets under your skin. Planet of the Apes. Look at him. Seriously. He looks like Cornelious."
Odelein to Barnaby: "He should take a look at his wife. She's God-awful to look at."
by RolliePollieKovy on Sep 12, 2010 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions
oh yes i actually remember that haha. Obviously i don’t want that to happen and i’m sure you don’t either. I was just saying it for kicks. If it were to actually happen I would probably go visit him and say sorry for sending a bad omen your way. Although it would solve the problem no? Or if that were to happen does his contract get taken off the books until he is better or is their +35 rules for long term injuries?
by Kyle Hamelin on Sep 12, 2010 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions
theoretically, if he did return from LTIR, I believe the cap hit returns. But a 37 year old doesn’t often miss a good chunk of the season and return.
Go Devils
Go Jets
Like sports betting? Sign up with centsports and do it for free
yea i figured that but it would just give lou more time i guess.
by Kyle Hamelin on Sep 12, 2010 9:09 PM EDT up reply actions
there is no way that would break his entire leg though. I wouldn’t think so at least. Just gotta hit the foot that’s all.
by Kyle Hamelin on Sep 12, 2010 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions
if he was joking, then my comment won’t bother him. He won’t be in line for anything.
Go Devils
Go Jets
Like sports betting? Sign up with centsports and do it for free
Even if he was joking, it’s not cool to make jokes about people getting injured. Even if it’s a guy on the Flyers getting injured.
In Lou We Trust: Freshly signed to the last 15 year deal in the history of SBNation
If the quality of my posts begin to get better, it's because i'm doing steroids.
by Kevin Sellathamby on Sep 13, 2010 7:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Considering I live in Philly and don’t hate the Flyers in any way, I wouldn’t wish injury on any of them. A Ranger or Penguin sure, but not a Flyer.
by PhillyNJD9Fan30 on Sep 13, 2010 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions
I was using the Flyers as an example (I’m not too fond of them). You can sub in the Rags or Pens or whomever there.
In Lou We Trust: Freshly signed to the last 15 year deal in the history of SBNation
If the quality of my posts begin to get better, it's because i'm doing steroids.
by Kevin Sellathamby on Sep 13, 2010 8:47 PM EDT up reply actions
I’d be fine with paying half his salary this year, but when I saw that we’d be on the hook for 2.5M again next year without him on the roster that’s too much. You can’t have 2.5M of dead space on your cap, especially next year when we need to re-sign Zach and Greene plus replace guys like Arnott and Jamie.
by PariseLikeSundayMornin on Sep 13, 2010 12:18 PM EDT reply actions
Putting him in the AHL and then re-entry waiver is not an option like mentioned before You can’t have deadspace you can’t get rid of for next year.
I believe they can waive him and if he clears just keep him on the roster (and move onto moving someone else at that point). Basically it would be a last ditch effort to get rid of him.
this doesn’t make any sense. whether or not rolston is here, he will never live up to his cap hit. if we translate a contract’s dollar value into on-the-ice value, rolston’s on-the-ice value is some fraction of his cap hit. therefore, having ‘dead space’ or not is irrelevant, once we’ve established that rolston is immovable via trade, and i think that’s pretty darn likely.
If you had a guarantee that Rolston would be picked up on re-entry waivers, than I’d say to go ahead and do it. I don’t think it is a guarantee, and here’s the bigger problem even if you believe you have a team that will do it:
What happens to the Devils if they think they have a deal and attempt the process, only to not have a taker for Rolston? If you predicate the Devils getting under the cap by way of giving away half of Rolston’s contract (and the player himself), and this falls apart, the Devils would be left scrambling to get under the cap at the deadline…. and likely without the ability to waive someone else to make room (timing would be an issue). That would almost oblige Lou to give away a good player — likely Zubrus, given the rapid timeframe and not wanting to risk an NTC scuttling things — and pay whatever price another team extorts for the privledge. Otherwise, the Devils are over the cap and in deep trouble.
To me, the “dead space” isn’t that much of an issue. I’d prefer not to have it, but since I can replace Rolston for less than the savings of a re-entry waiver, I’m not quite so concerned about it. The buyout/dead space that aggravates me is Andrew Peters, because he made league minimum and replacing him with another league minimum leaves the Devils down the buyout space for two seasons.
it takes no time at all to waive someone. this is not a concern of mine. in the absolute worst-case scenario, zubrus and salvador are playing in the minor leagues for albany.
it takes no time at all to waive someone
I’ll refer you to Pension Plan Puppets’ excellent article on the waiver process, which explains there is time involved in waiving players and bringing them back by way of re-entry waivers. Specifically, you’re looking at 24-48 hours between submitting a guy to either process and his clearing.
To that end, if you’re putting Rolston on re-entry waivers (with the idea of his being claimed) on October 6th, and he isn’t claimed, you’re stuck with the contract. While you could immediately stuff him back in Albany without another waiver process — although why he would be claimed on regular waivers if he just went unclaimed on re-entry waivers a few days prior is beyond me — my point is that the Devils would then be in a bind under the cap if moving Rolston’s contract (or half of it) was your way to get under the cap. You’d be leaving Lou Lamorello very little time to make a trade to get the team under the cap or shove someone else through immediate waivers if the timeframe does work out.
But why would we need to do so late?
According to that Article, they can put him on waivers 12 days before season starts. So even if it is two days, couldn’t they do this soon adn know with roughly a week to go whether they have to move a different player?
by Devilssection21fan on Sep 13, 2010 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions

by 





















