New Jersey Devils Win First Preseason Game in 3-2 Comeback Win Over Philadelphia Flyers
The New Jersey Devils beat the Philadelphia Flyers 3-2 in a comeback win in at Prudential Center in their forth preseason game. Trailing 2-1 late in the 3rd period, Travis Zajac scored a power play goal and Ilya Kovalchuk scored on a rising shot over Brian Boucher. Though the result is nice for the Devils, it means nothing. From John's preview, the goal tonight was to play smart hockey and concentrate on special teams. The Devils got plenty of looks on the man-advantage. Minus the Zajac goal, which was the Devils first of the preseason, the power play wasn't very good tonight, going 1 for 5 while even playing 5 forwards a couple times.
The Devils were able to stay out of the box this game, only committing two minor penalties and letting only 3 shots hit Martin Brodeur when shorthanded. Speaking of Martin Brodeur, he played well tonight, making a number of tough saves. He stopped 26 of 28 shots. He did have one turnover during a 2nd period power play to James van Riemsdyk, but it didn't lead to much. The Devils gave up an early 1st period goal to Jeff Carter 1:28 into the game. It looked like he was trying to set up Nikolai Zherdev, but the puck went off Brodeur, who was also playing the pass. It was a very on and off game, with some stints of energy between both teams. The Devils play improved as the game went on, especially after a slow sluggish start. Adam Mair scored the equalizer at 8:42 in the first period from a redirect set up by David Clarkson. Zherdev scored a few seconds after a Devils power play off his own rebound for the lone goal in the 2nd period.
Again, it's nice to get the win, but there are some things to collect from this game. Some more notes and such after the jump.
*UPDATED: NJDTV put up a video of Kovalchuk's game winner. I embedded it at the end of the post. Thanks to elesias.
A few notable Devils did not play tonight, like Zach Parise, Patrik Elias, and Henrik Tallinder. They don't need to play and the coaching staff want additional looks at the prospects. After the Devils assigned 11 players to the AHL today, a few of the remaining Devils prospects and try outs suited up. Head Coach John MacLean used a number of different line combinations compared to the previous preseason match ups. Mattias Tedenby lined up with Jason Arnott and Jamie Langenbrunner, and Jacob Josefson played between Dainius Zubrus and Clarkson. Alexander Urbom and Matt Taormina had a number of minutes after Bryce Salvador left the game midway through the 1st period after he was checked by van Riemsdyk. Per Gulitti, Salvador is fine and I;m assuming leaving him out of the game was precautionary.
Despite going into the first intermission tied, the 1st period wasn't very productive. Carter's goal in the beginning of the game was mostly due to the Zubrus-Josefson-Clarkson line chasing Flyers' around. Clarkson was behind Zherdev, who was approaching the net, which made Carter make the pass/shot. If Zherdev received the puck, it would have been a tough save for Marty to make. That line redeemed themselves as the game continued though. Clarkson had a semi-breakaway shortly after the goal and he set up Mair, his second goal of the preseason, later in the period. Around the end of period, the Devils were struggling against the Flyers 2nd line, having difficulty getting the puck out. The only big chances the Devils had was Kovalchuk on a one-timer (wide) and a golden opportunity when he skated into the slot with the puck and ripped a shot low on Boucher (also wide). Tedenby took a lousy tripping penalty at the end of the period. Philly was leading in shots on goal 11-5.
The 2nd period started a little better for the Devils. Both teams exchanged some bad angle shots and limited time in their own zones. The Devils picked it up a little bit with a good chance by Brian Rolston, who was playing with Zajac and Kovalchuk, took a nice shot between the circles that went off Boucher. It landed right on Kovalchuk's stick and was redirected/shot wide. Clarkson also had a nice high shot on Boucher (which was the area the Devils were aiming for majority of the time), who also gave up a big rebound. This led to the Devils drawing a couple of Scott Hartnell penalties. Unfortunately, they were dismal, and in between them Zherdev scored his 4th of the preseason. Hartnell was coming out of the box, the Devils (was it Anton Volchenkov?) turned the puck over while the forwards were changing. It led to a 3 on 2 and a 2-1 Flyers lead. The Devils played a better period, yet did not capitalize on the two power plays.
The 2nd power play in the 2nd period actually rolled over into the 3rd period, which again, didn't do much. John MacLean decided to make some adjustments on the next man advantage. He played five forwards at one point; it was uneventful and the Devils were 0 for 4 at this point. Ben Holmstrom took a tripping call at 13:45 in the period. The Devils and Maclean decided on five forwards again: Zajac-Arnott-Zubrus-Clarkson-Langenbrunner. Jason Arnott muscled his way along the boards to enter the zone, and threw a cross ice pass to Travis Zajac for the game-tying goal. It wasn't the type of power play goal we were looking for (setting up and passing around the point to create space), but it is a power play goal nonetheless. Clarkson got his 2nd assist of the game. It seemed the Devils would yet again go into overtime, yet a few minutes later and a few minutes remaining, Kovalchuk has possession of the puck outside the left circle, passed it to Tedenby who dishes it right back. Kovy made his way into the corner and quickly headed to the net on the sharp angle. He snapped a shot right over Boucher who was huggin the post. Though I didn't see it (Flyers feed just went out), it sounded like a nice goal. The Flyers pulled the goalie with over a minute left, but Marty, Urbom and Marcus Nilson made some nice plays at the end of the game to clear the puck just enough.
Overall, the Devils played OK. I felt Rolston kept his own with Zajac and Kovalchuk. They combined for 8 shots (4 were Rolston's) and 2 goals. Tedenby also showed his shooting capability by getting all 4 of his shots on net; he also added an assist. Clarkson netted 2 assists. Arnott, Volchenkov, and Taormina also had 1 assist.
Because of Salvador's injury, it left five defensemen to cycle six positions. Perhaps this is the reason why MacLean used five forwards on the PP? Mark Fraser, who didn't have a very good game at minus-2 tonight, and Matt Taormina wrapped up 18:39 and 20:40 TOI respectively. Kovalchuk led the Devils with 23:12 and Volchenkov led the defense with 22:57.
One good thing was the hitting. The Devils through out 28 hits (just as many as shots). Volchenkov had a game high 6 hits. Something the Devils stunk at: face-offs. Winning only 15 out of 31 41 (37%) is disgusting, including 3 for 10 on the power play and 0 for 3 on the penalty kill. Adam Mair going 2 for 7 and Josefson going 2 for 8 won't help.
The roster is dwindling, moves have to be made, and with three preseason games left, the Devils still have a number of issues to address. The penalty kill was good, and the hitting was good. It's also nice that Zajac and Kovalchuk aren't slowing down. The come from behind win, and a win overall is good for the team. The power play again was just awful, as well as face offs. If the Devils want to be a more offensive team, these two aspects of the game must improve.
So what did you think of the game? Do you notice something or someone I didn't mention? Leave your thoughts in the comments, and thanks for reading.
26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
i think one thing is for sure, Tedenby is NOT ready. He will be at some point as he has shown he can be magical with the puck. But being small and under weight doesn’t cut it in the nhl as it does in a country like sweden where everyone has more space because of the rink being bigger. What will help is once he gets filled out he definitely has the talent to be a top 6 guy so well see maybe mid year hell join the club
I agree, Tedenby’s not there yet. He showed some flashes last night, but did most of his work off the rush. Even on the rush, a little more strength, puck-shielding, and being able to get another step on the Dmen would do wonders for him. Still, he didn’t figure much into the offense once we got the puck into the zone, and his defensive awareness leaves something to be desired. Hopefully some time in the AHL will help him develop. I think he should pattern his game after Martin St. Louis’.
whats the deadline to get under the salary cap?
by Ahmad Bradshaw on Sep 29, 2010 12:41 AM EDT reply actions
October 6th
In Lou We Trust: SBN Blog of the New Jersey Devils
"Hockey is the only job I know where you get paid to have a nap on the day of the game." - Chico Resch
by Matthew Ventolo on Sep 29, 2010 12:59 AM EDT up reply actions
Apologies..
sorry for that post. it was accidental. now i was just wondering if anyone could manage to find video of Kovy’s goal from tonight? I don’t know if requests are OK but I heard the goal was very sweet and I’d like to get to see it.
Thanks in advance either way.
by PhillyNJD9Fan30 on Sep 29, 2010 1:57 AM EDT reply actions
Wow.
Guess I hit “preview” and it didn’t acutally post.
Sorry again!
by PhillyNJD9Fan30 on Sep 29, 2010 1:58 AM EDT reply actions
I guess it’s always nice to win, but was nice to see Tedenby get a game. I think the NHL is a bit too tough for him at least for another year.
He’s going to be a great player but his time is not yet.
Also, sorry to nitpick but “Winning only 15 out of 31 (37%)” surely that’s 48% (and a bit more reputable)
Can’t wait for the regular season…
Ireland? An Ice Hockey Team?
You'd better believe it...
No nitpick. The Devils actually went 15 for 41. Typo by me, Thanks.
In Lou We Trust: SBN Blog of the New Jersey Devils
"Hockey is the only job I know where you get paid to have a nap on the day of the game." - Chico Resch
by Matthew Ventolo on Sep 29, 2010 8:49 AM EDT up reply actions
Kovalchuk goal
I saw the kovie goal. Kovie was zoning in on boucher from boucher’s right side. He hugged the post and (i think) he layed his stick down so that kovie couldnt pass to the man at the top of boucher’s crease. Kovie shot the puck over the kneeling boucher’s shoulder to score a top shelf late goal.
The Good, The Bad, The Ugly
My friend/co-worker with season tickets is down in Florida, so he gave me his seats for last night’s game (5th row over Marty’s left shoulder). Admittedly, a different vantage from watching someone’s telecase, but this is what I thought:
Attendance was lackluster, but this is a mid-week pre-season game. I’d say the arena might have been half full, and there were massive swaths of the lower sections that were empty.
I had seats at the “wrong end” of the ice — the only goal that was scored in front of me was the Carter tally ninety seconds in. Oh well, them’s the breaks.
With Parise and Elias out of the lineup, Jason Arnott and Ilya Kovalchuk each sported an alternate captaincy.
The Devils’ down-low coverage is still miserable. The Flyers were setting up behind the net or in the slot with virtual impunity most of the night, and if they had spent any more time camped out there, Cory Booker would have sent them rent bills on behalf of the City of Newark. If the puck on the first goal had gotten through to Zherdev, Marty would have had absolutely no chance to stop him from scoring. Heck, it looked like the playoffs all over again the way the Flyers were working that part of the ice.
The Devils’ defensemen are also still having trouble clearing the zone. Hopefully, this was more a case of Tallinder and Greene not being in the lineup last night, but it is certainly troubling. It isn’t like the Flyers dressed their entire “A” team last night, considering Briere, Pronger, Carcillo, and Timonen were all missing from that lineup.
I thought we’d have a more spirited and pugnacious game than we did. The Flyers didn’t seem particularly interested in too much hitting, and completely uninterested in fighting. Maybe it was because they were wearing their “minimal black” uniforms…. which by the way are butt-ugly.
I barely noticed Marcus Nilson last night, and probably only because I was making a point of watching for him and the other bubble boys. That’s not a good way to make the team. Fraser looked overmatched at times last night. The young Swedish forwards showed flashes, but they also don’t get any benefit of the doubt from the refs…. while I didn’t have a good view of the play (being low at the other end of the ice), wasn’t there a first-period breakaway where something should have been called and the refs ignored their whistles?
On the other hand, Urbom and Taormina impressed me. I’d have to say Urbom even more than on my first impression, since I thought Salvador had returned to the game to take a regular shift, but apparantly a lot of what I thought I saw was the kid. It’s only one game, but I wouldn’t object to Taormina and Urbom getting regular playing time in the regular season if that is how they’re going to play.
Adam Mair looked good and energetic at times, but he also took a questionable penalty. If Pelley is going to center the fourth line, I don’t know that there’s really a spot for Mair except perhaps as an extra forward…. Mair certainly isn’t a third-line center. I’m starting to think that role will go to Josefson by default, unless Lou brings in another guy during his salary dump trades.
While the numbers were different, the Devils’ special teams still concern me. The penalty kill wasn’t all that wonderful, and the power play was largely impotent. I’m hoping a lot of the latter can be chalked up to Elias, Greene, and Parise being out of the lineup. However, if Johnny Mac is going to use the top line plus Rolston and Greene on PP1, and the second line plus Zubrus/Clarkson and Urbom/Taormina on PP2, I think Kovy needs to be taken off the top line and put with Elias and Arnott. Simply put, a PP unit of Elias, Arnott, Langenbrunner, Clarkson/Zubrus, and a defenseman doesn’t scare me, and I don’t know that it scares anyone else, either.
David Clarkson was the best Devil, for my money. He was flying out there, he was physical, and he was working hard offensively all night. He created Mair’s first goal, and he had a hand in Zajac’s goal as well…. plus he had several good chances of his own.
Ilya Kovalchuk was the best player on the ice by a country mile in the third period. The difference between Ilya Kovalchuk and everyone else was the second best player on the ice in the third period. The post above doesn’t give Kovy anywhere near enough credit for creating Zajac’s game-tying goal — Ilya dominated the entire shift before Holmstrom simply took him down, treating the Flyers on the ice as pylons while going through and around them and creating a good scoring chance for himself in the process. I imagine if there had simply been a stoppage of play, Ilya would have gotten a standing ovation from the PruCenter crowd for that shift.
That last goal was all Ilya as well. Sure, Tedenby and Taormina got assists on the play, but there aren’t many players in the League who could have made that play and scored on it. Probably a “bad goal” by definition, but I don’t know what else Boucher could have done there, he just got beat by a terrific player and a well-placed shot.
At least in the third period, I think Ilya Kovalchuk answered somebody’s question with a loud “yes”.
by acasser on Sep 29, 2010 10:03 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
people just see clarkson differently – i see clarkson doing some stuff, but mostly wasting possessions and ice time. he has the puck on his stick a lot, but manages to do very little with it. i know he ended up with an assist on mair’s goal, that was a nice pass, but he does not make enough happen to justify that contract.
elias arnott langenbrunner clarkson/zubrus and a defenseman would be better than just about everyone else’s 2nd unit in the league, probably.
Clarkson’s problem is that he doesn’t get the opportunities a similar player gets with most of the other teams in the league. The Devils are loaded on the wing, which means Clarkie is getting third-line minutes. And in today’s salary capped NHL, a third-liner who makes that kind of coin needs to play both sets of special teams, which David does not.
Personally, I’d like to see Clarkson given a chance to play with Zajac and Parise for an extended period. If he were to do that, I believe he’d become a fantasy hockey owner’s dream: I think he’d come close to matching Langenbrunner’s offensive numbers, he’ll still get his fair share of PIMs, and his +/- would be out of this world. I also think Clarkson being a pest in front of the net would help Zach pick his spots, and might even keep him out of the firing line of dirty hits because he’d have a mild “enforcer” on the ice with him.
elias arnott langenbrunner clarkson/zubrus and a defenseman would be better than just about everyone else’s 2nd unit in the league, probably.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying these are bad players. I just don’t think they mesh properly (at least on the PP). Langenbrunner and Arnott are similar players, in that their biggest asset is a booming shot (deployed from the point, oftentimes). Clarkson or Zubrus make for a nice, big body in front of the net…. but I don’t see how you’re most effectively utilizing Elias’ playmaking abilities here. Swap Langenbrunner for Kovalchuk, however, and you’ve got a different story. If you don’t want Kovy on the point of the revised 2nd unit (and I’d be prone to leave Arnott back there), let Elias dominate the puck and Kovy move about. Beyond Ilya being able to find “hot spots”, he’ll occupy the defense which would open up shooting lanes for the point men.
there’s a reason why clarkson isn’t tried with that trio, because he will bring them all down with his puck-handling misadventures. to play on that line, you have to make good decisions, which clarkson does not do enough of the time. i don’t care about clarkson’s goals and assist numbers very much – i just watch him continually go wide on defensemen with absolutely no plan, or attempt toe-drags that have little chance of success. he’s got a good shot, it’s deceptive, but he has to try to use it more, instead of just ineffectually lugging the puck around the offensive zone with no idea where it will go.
A valid premise, but only if you also accept that David Clarkson would be the primary puckhandler on a Parise-Zajac-Clarkson unit. I don’t.
I think Clarkson could change parts of his game to fit in. I think Zajac and Parise can have a positive influence on Clarkson. I certainly think those two can convince Clarkson that there needs to be more to his game than the toe-drag and the wraparound…. for example, Parise holding the puck around the circles while Clarkson is crashing the net for rebounds and/or deflections.
I also think part of why Clarkson tries to do so much is because of who he plays with. When your linemates are substandard (Rolston and Zubrus and Rob Niedermeyer certainly qualify in that department, when compared to others he could have been skating with on last year’s roster), you have to try and do more yourself. When you’ve got better linemates, you can let them do some more to carry you and fit yourself in around them.
zubrus and rolston are fine linemates – they’ve done more in the NHL than he ever has. when he shows the ability to use his teammates in a positive manner, maybe he’d get a shot to do so. until then, around the net and into a turnover we go.
I agree with Triumph that Clarkson could end up reducing the effectiveness of the Parise/Zajac line. He does have issues using his linemates effectively, and he doesn’t seem to see the ice or his options well.
That said, why not give him a try with those two anyway? After all, we’re not talking about trying it out during the playoffs – just give it a try in the preseason and early in the regular season. He may not be the best passer but at least he doesn’t give up the puck easily.
There are some odd combinations that have worked out well in this league – Alex Burrows on a line with the Sedin twins comes to mind – and you just never know. The success of a Parise-Zajac-Clarkson would really depend on Clarkie’s cycling skills (which continue to get stronger) and ability to bang home rebounds (something he’s not yet really shown a predilection for).
As for Clarkson’s performance in last night’s game – I thought he was good. I was too busy watching Volchenkov crush Flyer after Flyer to notice whether Clarkson brought his A game physically, but in terms of participation in the offense, I thought he was pretty good all night. He and Zubrus were fairly effective on the cycle even without Josefson helping them out much and they generated some good chances down low. There were still a few low-percentage toe drags and wraparounds, but I think his game has matured since last year – most of all in the cycle.
fourth liners
Presuming our top-9 forwards to be Parise-Zajac-Kovalchuk, Elias-Arnott-Langenbrunner, Zubrus/Rolston-Josefson-Clarkson wherein either Zubrus or Rolston are traded, I’ll put these probabilities out there for each player vying for a spot on the big club as a fourth liner / extra forward(s) (total adds up to 400% assuming 4 available spots):
Adam Mair – 95%
PL3 – 95%
Rod Pelley – 75%
Vladimir Zharkov – 65%
Alexander Vasyunov – 65%
Nick Palmieri – 5%
His two goals aside, I’ve been pleasantly surprised by Mair’s energy and decent amount of skill. He’s also been getting some PK time. The biggest surprise, though, is Zharkov’s noticeable absence. He’s played in just one out of the four preseason games, and you have to wonder why.
Oh, and if Langenbrunner gets traded as a sweetener for dumping someone like Rolston or Zubrus? I think Tedenby, ready or not, will get that coveted second line spot (though Zharkov and Vasyunov will be in the running).
I think Pelley and PL3 have spots on the team wrapped up already. Leblond will be around as the enforcer, although he could be a healthy scratch on nights Johnny Mac doesn’t think his presence is required (either for not needing one, or because Clarkson and/or Pelley can handle the job against a particular opponent). I think Mair has a very good chance to make the team if he’ll take the league minimum, although I’d be a lot happier if he could kill penalties — the Devils are going to wear out their top forwards playing all situations. Personally, I’m not sold on Mair…. while he’s shown he’d make a nice fourth-liner, he’s not a third-line center, and I think he’s very similar to Rod Pelley. Given Pelley is already getting paid, and Mair isn’t just yet, I don’t know we need to duplicate (although I suppose Pelley could be used as a sweetener in a salary dump).
After that, I suppose the question is whether the Devils carry 13 forwards of 14. And then the question becomes who they think benefits more from playing every night at Albany as opposed to practicing with the big boys. If I had to choose now, I think Zharkov stays given he was here last season, and Vasyunov goes back down.
Oh, and if Langenbrunner gets traded as a sweetener for dumping someone like Rolston or Zubrus? I think Tedenby, ready or not, will get that coveted second line spot (though Zharkov and Vasyunov will be in the running).
Why is everyone so quick and keen to trade Jamie Langenbrunner?!? And who says Jamie will even accept a trade to wherever one is dumping another salary? Furthermore, is Lou going to even take the risk of discussing a salary dump where Langenbrunner is required as an enticement, given how quickly things can go sour with the NTC?
I’ve stated it above, and I’ll state it here. I think Clarkson gets the first chance if a Top 6 role opens up, unless Zubrus is still around. If Rolston and Langenbrunner go in this hypothetical scenario of yours, I think Zubrus gets the first crack simply because he had that job most of last season. Neither Zharkov nor Vasyunov have demonstrated to me that they are capable of handling the role, and putting either one there with the expectations it would involve (as individuals, as a line, and on the team as a whole) simply invites disaster.
I’m with you on this one;
Why is everyone so quick and keen to trade Jamie Langenbrunner?!? And who says Jamie will even accept a trade to wherever one is dumping another salary?
He’s solid, experienced, and has a salary that it a bargain for what he provides.
The Devils don’t have to get crazy getting under cap. If trades are too demanding, they can, at the end of the day, pass a couple guys to Albany and be done with it.
Yeah, I don’t get it either.
I think people see his age and forget what he’s done the past two years and only remember his tiff with Lemaire and drop in production at the end of last year and want him gone.
Maybe to some people he’s become the face of the Devils post-season failures?
Regardless, he’s still got plenty left in the tank and he’s an absolute bargain at his salary. He’s also in a contract year, so he’s got something extra to play for this year… and if he’s dogging it or isn’t fitting in, he can be a much better bargaining chip at the trade deadline (NTC notwithstanding).
Besides, moving his salary doesn’t by itself resolve the team’s cap issue, and it also leaves a top 6 forward spot open that, at this point in time, would be a downgrade no matter who were to be plugged in.
Playing Devils' advocate since 1982.
i don’t want him moved, but lou doesn’t have that many options. furthermore, langenbrunner will probably not be a bargain at his salary at age 35, especially if he’s not playing with parise and zajac.
He’s got enough options that Jamie shouldn’t be in the discussion.
He “only” makes $2.8m. Looking at some of the comparably paid players out there, if he can manage 30-40 points, which I see no reason not to expect even if he remains away from Zajac and Parise since he’s done that every season of his career save one (26 points in 53 GP in 03-04) when not playing with them, then he’s earning his pay.
If he does better than 40 points, also not a stretch as he’s done it 6 times (and twice hit 39) without being on the ZZPops line all year… then I’d say he’s a bargain.
Playing Devils' advocate since 1982.
I’m not at all saying I want Langenbrunner to be traded. He’s a good, versatile player that comes at great value.
The Devils only seem to have a few options to get under the cap, though. One is to go strictly by the waiver wire route and waive Zubrus and Salvador, or to waive one of those two and re-entry waive Rolston. Another is to go the trade route and try to get rid of Zubrus, Salvador, or Rolston that way. It increasingly looks as though no team needs help in the 2nd or 3rd line forward/defensive Dman department so badly that they are willing to take those contracts on straight up. I was looking over at Mile High Hockey and almost all of the fans there were saying they wouldn’t go near the Zubrus or Rolston contracts with a ten-foot pole unless they got Langenbrunner as well. And I can’t blame them. If they want to replace Peter Mueller, they shouldn’t look to Zubrus or Rolston.
I think teams are going to hold out for a sweetener. They’re not just going to take on guys like Zubrus, Rolston, or Salvador as salary dumps straight-up. Also, remember that the NHL can strike down deals that appear to be obvious salary dumps or “non-hockey deals”. There has to be something going the other way which makes sense hockey-wise for both teams and the bigger and more complicated the trade is, the easier it is to make an argument that it fills needs on each team.
So, given the choice between throwing Langenbrunner in there as a sweetener vs a first-rounder or top prospect…I think the trade rumors involving Langenbrunner make a lot more sense. Would teams take on Salvador for a prospect like Vasyunov or Zharkov? Maybe. But the Devils would still need to trade Zubrus, and that would require a bigger sweetener, and I don’t think guys like Vas or Zharkov will cut it.
Of course, going the waiver wire route instead makes the most sense of all for the team, but I just get the feeling that Lou is reluctant to put these guys in the minors, but keeps that option in his back pocket to give him some leverage in trade talks. Ultimately, my guess is that he’s not able to make the trades without giving up a pound of flesh, and ends up waiving Zubrus and Salvador anyway, but it wouldn’t surprise me if Langenbrunner goes in a package deal with either Zubrus or Rolston.
With the way Taor and Urbom are getting time, and Zubs playing so well with JJ and Clarkie, I wouldn’t be surprised if White and Salvs were the primarily targeted movers, however they are being moved.
I’m still convinced that Lou is not going to do something that involves top tier prospects or good value players in clearing this space. IF nothing mutually beneficial comes of trade talks, he’s just going to waive a couple guys to Albany. I know it’s a crap thing to do to them, but its a business.
Anyone else get the feeling that Salv ear/hit/head thing going on now is the road to a season on IR?

by 

























