Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: All Hail David Luiz

2011 Trade Deadline: The New Jersey Devils as Sellers. What Kinds of Return Should They Expect?

I am of the optimistic persuasion but also a realist. The hope that the Devils will make the playoffs has long passed and unless there is a miraculous turnaround the Devils will be sellers at the trade deadline for the first time since 1989. Seriously. 1989. (Yes, the Devils didn't make the playoffs in 1996, but they made all efforts to do so.) That's why I can be disappointed, but not angry at the organization  as for 20 years they have provided me with quality hockey and I would be a selfish jerk if stopped watching them or going to games after one bad season. I am already excited for the future and thinking towards next year and more immediately about the trade deadline and draft. 
 
After coming to terms that the Devils will be sellers at the trade deadline, the questions become what players do they sell and what can they get for those players. After the jump I identify the players who might be traded, look at the past two trade deadlines to attempt to correlate some value and identify some potential trade partners. Only 57 days left to the trade deadline.

Star-divide

Who should/could the Devils trade?

There are  four candidates that make sense for the Devils to move.

Jamie Langenbrunner, Jason Arnott, Johan Hedberg and Andy Greene. Before I move on, let me try to address the questions you may have.

1.Wait what about the No-Trade-Clauses (NTC) some of those players have?

I don't foresee a problem with getting Langenbrunner, Arnott, or Hedberg to waive their NTCs for 2 or 3 months. It's financially advantageous to them to display their skills in the playoffs to help boost their free agency values.  Plus they get to go to the playoffs. Since it would be a 3.5 month commitment -at most- it also doesn't disrupt family life that much either.

2. Andy Greene? Why Andy Greene? He is our only defenseman who has offensive abilities!

Greene is someone I like but at 28 years old we might have seen or be seeing his best hockey. I am not talking about giving him away. As a defenseman who can move the puck he can offer a good option for playoff teams with limited cap space there will be a premium pick or even a player returned if he is moved. Further, there is also no reason why the Devils couldn't sign him once he is a UFA.  Greene's position, talent, and I can't stress this enough -his salary-make him a valuable commodity. 


I looked at the 'dump' trades that took place from 1/31 up until the trade deadline for the past two years. Therefore I excluded lateral deals (an example being the Dion Phaneuf deal the Flames-Maple Leafs made last year).  What I have found for the past two years is a few things:

1. Rarely do players with any additional years on their contract get moved and if they do it's as RFA.   2. A 2nd Round Pick is the standard return for a player moved. 3. Goaltenders haven't really been moved, but those who have been usually fetch at least a 4th Round Pick. 4. Contract amounts haven't really been an issue. As long as they have the cap amount, teams in contention don't seem that concerned in taking on salary for a 1/4 of a year.  I have even taken the likely percentage of salary that the team acquiring a player would be responsible for and listed it in the tables below.  5. Conditional picks typically end up being 3rd round picks. 6. In a deadline deal 1st Round picks/top prospects seem to be off limits.

2009 Trade Deadline Deals:
2009_trades_medium

2010 Trade Deadline Deals:

 

 2010_trades_medium 

Based on the players traded in the past, I suspect both Langenbrunner and Arnott are worth 2nd round picks unless they get injured. Andy Greene's salary also makes him an attractive option and if Andy Sutton can get moved for a 2nd round pick Greene is certainly worth that.

Hedberg, based on past deals and the quality of the goaltenders traded could return a 3rd or 4th round pick to a team who wants an experienced backup to a young goaltender. That said, an injury to a goalie on a playoff contender could make him infinitely more valuable.

The trades that have taken place so far-both including perpetual sellers the New York Islanders-with the future in mind have brought similar returns as to deals that took place in 2009 and 2010.  Defenseman James Wisniewski went to the Montreal Canadiens for a 2nd round pick in 2011 and a compensatory 5th in 2012.  The 2nd round pick is already determined (50th overall) since it was a result of Montreal not signing a past 1st round pick, which is why I believe the 5th rounder was added.  The Islanders then traded goaltender Dwayne Roloson to the Tampa Bay Lightning for prospect Ty WishartWishart is discussed here by the Lighthouse Hockey crew.  From a brief review I would think he would be comparable to a 2nd or 3rd round pick in the upcoming draft.   

Now it's easy to say, we should get this pick for that player but in practice it doesn't work like that. Some teams in contention may not have the right assets, might be a Devils rival or not need what the Devils have to offer. Plus things might change in two months so it is hard to define trading partners. What we do know right now is that the following teams have multiple picks in either the 1st, 2nd or 3rd rounds in the 2011 draft.

I have color coded the list. Yellow is for potential trade partners, red is for teams that for rivalry reasons I could never see Lou Lamoriello trading with and blue is for teams that will likely not be buyers come deadline time.

Multiple_picks_medium

The teams that will likely be contenders and currently have multiple picks are Chicago, Boston and Nashville. Nashville's additional 2nd round pick is actually the Devils. Chicago has two additional 2nd round picks from trades with the Flames and Thrashers. The Flames pick should be fairly high in the 2nd round.  Even the extra pick that Chicago has in the 3rd round should be fairly high as it is a pick that originally belonged to the Maple Leafs.

Boston is the most interesting of the three. With a top pick via Toronto from the Phil Kessel trade they are the only team with two 1st round picks and the Devils might look to target the Bruins pick which would be in the mid-late teens.  The Bruins also have the Wild's 2nd round pick.  

Any trade with a team up against the cap limit like Boston or Chicago might involve taking some salary back, which could make a deal problematic, but not impossible.

There is still a lot of hockey to be played, but the idea that the Devils might make the playoffs is slipping away rapidly. The Devils should be aggressive in the trade market to maximize the expiring contracts on their roster. Holding onto the belief that they can make the playoffs isn't helping the future of the franchise.   The upcoming trade deadline won't fully rebuild the Devils for next year it is just a piece of what is needed to be done


So, now I turn it over to you:


Should the Devils hold out until deadline day or be aggressive and try to start moving pieces to 'buyers' now?

Any prospects on any contending teams that the Devils might want to target instead of picks?

Would you rather try to acquire a 2012 or 2013 draft pick as a backup to the pick that the Devils must forfeit?

Would you rather have (1) three 2nd round picks or (2) late 1st first round/mid 2nd round pick?

Keep the comments realistic, no unicorn deals. The Bruins aren't going to give us the Maple Leafs 1st round pick for Langenbrunner.  Thanks for reading!

Comment 44 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I don’t have any particular trades in mind, but I would think that Arnott and Langenbrunner may be the most trade value since they both have Stanley Cup winning experience along with expiring contracts.

If I could trade one for a 2nd round pick and the other for a 3rd rounder and maybe a solid 3rd/4th line player I think that would be pretty solid. It wouldn’t necessarily have to be a young player but just someone who you know can play on the 4th line and not be a liability, basically someone who would be an improvement over Tim Sestito.

by TexasDevilFan on Jan 3, 2011 11:39 AM EST reply actions  

Trade Deadline

I like your trade observations but Lou is always looking to make a killing. I believe that he should try to move our dead wood as soon as possible before other GM unload theirs.

by Old Puck 1 on Jan 3, 2011 12:14 PM EST reply actions  

Nice. I’ve been hoping someone would do an analysis like this.

I’m surprised how a 2nd rounder is the standard return no matter who the traded player is. That said, there are a few players who were pending UFAs and who earned their teams a 2nd rounder plus something extra: Nik Antropov, Matt Cullen, Dennis Seidenberg, Raffi Torres, Lee Stempniak, Joe Corvo.

Maybe I’ve been drinking the Kool Aid for too long, but frankly I think Langenbrunner, Arnott, and Greene are all comparable to all those players – better than Torres and Antropov, about equal to Seidenberg, Corvo, and Stempniak, and perhaps a little less than Matt Cullen.

While I expect the return for Langenbrunner and Arnott to be a 2nd rounder+ each, I think Greene could net us a better return than either of them. Defensemen as cheap as Greene on selling teams who can step into top-4 roles are rare, and more teams are right up against the cap right now than in prior years. I look to Boston and Chicago as potential destinations for Greene – teams that lack defensive depth beyond their top-4, who believe they could contend now, but lack the cap space to make a deal without dumping salary. While I doubt those teams would want to part with a 1st rounder not knowing whether it’s in the middle of the round or late in the round, I hope Greene could return a good, NHL-ready prospect at C or RW with 2nd-line potential.

by dr(d)evil on Jan 3, 2011 12:42 PM EST reply actions  

I thought it was interesting that 2nd round picks were the status quo.

And I don’t think you are drinking the kool aid. If Dominic Moore is worth a second round pick, then certainly Langs/Arnott are. Luckily teams don’t have to worry about their cap that much with a guy like Arnott.

by Tom Stivali on Jan 3, 2011 12:50 PM EST up reply actions  

moore was worth a 2nd round pick in 2011, i think that’s worth noting. also his salary was very low, so he was easy to add. also there’s probably an argument that moore and langenbrunner are about equally good.

i have high hopes that greene can somehow recover his worth and be a useful trade chip. if not, i’m not averse to re-signing him.

by Triumph44 on Jan 3, 2011 12:54 PM EST up reply actions  

in 2009 Moore was traded for a 2nd round pick in that same year.

by Tom Stivali on Jan 3, 2011 1:01 PM EST up reply actions  

in 2009, moore was coming off a much better season, but point taken.

by Triumph44 on Jan 3, 2011 1:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I should have mentioned that in my original comment. Actually I should have just mentioned that the Senators gave up a 2nd rounder for Sutton.

by Tom Stivali on Jan 3, 2011 1:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks, Ottawa!

These are also the guys who gave the Isles the 1st and Dean McAmmond for Mr. Hilary Duff and Chris Campoli. Apparently you can get anything from those guys. Daniel Alfredsson guarantees they will not be undersold!

known far and wide for stat-fu and irking people
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
"isn’t it amazingly simple to use the link pop-up?" - JPinVA

by mikb on Jan 3, 2011 2:03 PM EST up reply actions  

LL’s first call better be to Ottawa. “What if I was to tell you that I would give you Jamie Langenbrunner, you would win a cup and Canada would love you. All for just a first round pick. Is that something you might be interested in?”

by Tom Stivali on Jan 3, 2011 2:22 PM EST up reply actions  

I like what you said about the Boston trade. I would definately like to see them try to get a mid-late first rounder to go along with the high first rounder they hopefully already are going to get.
Could would see Arnott heading back to Nashville? You think they would give us that second pick back?

by maliky on Jan 3, 2011 1:31 PM EST reply actions  

I kept thinking of that (Arnott to Nashville) and laughed, but if Lombardi is questionable to come back and Nashville wants a center it wouldn’t be the worst fit for him and them.

by Tom Stivali on Jan 3, 2011 1:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Whats Salvidor’s status? If he were to get back in the lineup soon, he would be someone else to trade.

by maliky on Jan 3, 2011 1:40 PM EST reply actions  

Still ‘status quo’. So no new news. What you see is players with extra years on their contract not likely to move at the deadline. Teams who are buyers want rentals. Salvador’s extra year- like Rolston’s did-make him tough to move even when healthy, which we have no idea when that will be happening. Plus, with Salvador’s concussion issues a team wouldn’t be willing to take a chance at a $3MM cap hit in 2011-2012.

by Tom Stivali on Jan 3, 2011 1:46 PM EST up reply actions  

since salvador is taking this long from a pre season hit and might not play the entire season he might just be done for his career..

by KovyisLove on Jan 3, 2011 4:35 PM EST up reply actions  

I think you have to look at where we’re at and where we’re going. If Lou thinks we need a complete re-tooling, then these guys are going to get moved for picks and the rebuild will be under way. I doubt that though. I think Lou believes that we just need to tinker, perhaps get a little younger and faster. That’s not necessarily going to happen from simply clearing out dead space and promoting all of our youth. That’s not how the Devils do things.

So, with a tweaking in mind, I think Lou is going to free up some space and instead of picks, might be looking more towards prospects as compensation. For example, the rumors about NJ wanting Voinev from LA. A prospect is more likely to make the team in the next year or two rather than an 18 yr old kid drafted this year or next. We’ll keep a solid core but I’d say Lou will look to add some faster skating d-men, a RW who could replace Langenbrunner, and possibly another center to back up Josefson.

We have a glut of d-men and to make room to upgrade, someone is going to have to go. I’d expect White, Tallinder, and A-Train. If Salvador is untradeble, look for one of Corrente, Salmela, or Fraser to get moved. Especially if they think Taormina can hold a spot.

Corrente to Florida for a 2nd rounder.
Langenbrunner to Boston or San Jose
Arnott possibly moved now to Ottawa or Washington.

I’m thinking Clarkson might also fetch us a decent prospect.

by Devils1029 on Jan 3, 2011 1:53 PM EST reply actions  

I would love for the Devils to go down this path and get players who are closer to NHL duty, but the problem is I don’t see that based upon the deals of the past few years. Plus, we have to be cognizant of the total number of contracts the team has. As Triumph44 pointed out the other night the Devils are at like 48 or 49 total contracts and they can’t go above 50. So for each player(s) you move you have to be careful how much you take back. They also have Mike Hoeffel who will likely sign a contract soon.

I am sure some teams would be willing to move prospects but personally if all that would be available are the Ty Wishart’s of the world I may be more apt to take picks, and let the player develop in juniors or the NCAA.

All that said, based upon the drafting history of the Devils it might be better to take other people’s prospects than trying to pick their own.

by Tom Stivali on Jan 3, 2011 2:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Based on history, you’re right but in that case, these teams cleaning house are those that tend to be habitual bottom feeders (like the Islanders) and not a team coming off a 100 point season just 1 year prior. Injuries, under-performing players, lack of confidence, whatever you want o say about this year, I believe LL thinks it’s a fluke and with the right tweaks, especially to the defense, we could be contenders again next year.

by Devils1029 on Jan 3, 2011 2:28 PM EST reply actions  

Allow me to play devil’s advocate here.

I don’t foresee a problem with getting Langenbrunner, Arnott, or Hedberg to waive their NTCs for 2 or 3 months. It’s financially advantageous to them to display their skills in the playoffs to help boost their free agency values.

I don’t know that any of these guys really have anything to gain financially. They’re all going to have issues with their next contract going forward, because each of them will be into the 35+ realm. When you consider Brian Rolston (among others), I don’t know that you’re looking at sizable deals. I don’t know that any of these three are going to get long-term deals…. two years, maybe three at most. The dollars shouldn’t move very much, either, barring an injury. To quote a former NFL coach, “They are who we thought they were!”

Let me argue the opposite, in fact. It might be to the benefit of Arnott, Langenbrunner, et al, to block any trades. This way, their agent can position them as guys whose numbers would have been better, but they got stuck with a really crummy situation on a team that didn’t score a whole heck of a lot. Then, you pitch another GM something like “If they get on your team, who is an offensive juggernaut in comparison to the 2010-2011 Devils, their numbers will return to form and you’ll look like a genius for taking them on!” More than that, the one thing any of these players cannot afford is an injury, because that could destroy their bargaining position entirely. No playoffs means they’d probably get rested a little down the stretch and not have the risk of an April/May injury. Sure, they miss out on the playoffs, but two of the three guys in question already have Cups on their resume, and it might not mean quite as much to them to win another.

That being said, I don’t really believe the above applies…. but it is a potential line(s) of reasoning to work from if things don’t go where we’d like them to.

On to the logic of the article…. I don’t know that Langenbrunner can fetch a #2 at this point. I view him as an Alex Ponikarovsky sort of pickup, and he didn’t exactly reap the Maple Leafs significant returns last year…. a second-tier prospect (Luca Caputi) who hasn’t been able to keep himself at the NHL level, and a depth defenseman (Martin Skoula) who was spun off for a 5th-round pick. I could see Arnott netting a #2, however, especially for a team that needs a center…. Jason has played well this year.

by acasser on Jan 3, 2011 2:29 PM EST reply actions  

I think Jamie is calling you right now to be his agent.

IMO, I would think they would want to refresh themselves in a new city for a few months. But there are downsides to it you are right. I would hope that their competitive nature would make them want to play for a contender, but your right if it didn’t work for the Ray Whitney last year, it may not work for Arnott/Langs.

I don’t know that Langenbrunner can fetch a #2 at this point.

I think he can. With Dominic Moore’s, Andy Sutton’s going for second round picks in the past, I think the precedent is there. But relying on precedent has certainly bit Devil’s fans you know where recently.

by Tom Stivali on Jan 3, 2011 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

I think Jamie is calling you right now to be his agent.

Darned Verizon service…. the voice mail hasn’t come through yet. Then again, someone I left a voice mail for at 5:15 last night called me ten minutes ago to tell me that they just got my message. =)

Too bad you aren’t serious…. I’d take being a player agent over “real work” any day. =) Even if I only got 2% of Jamie’s contract, that wouldn’t be such a bad deal. =)

if it didn’t work for the Ray Whitney last year, it may not work for Arnott/Langs

Whitney tried to use his NTC to extort a multi-year extension out of Los Angeles (many reports had him wanting a three-year extension). The Kings weren’t interested in biting…. and Whitney got his term this summer anyhow. I don’t know that the same trick would work for Langenbrunner or Arnott at this point…. I’m not sure their value is as high as Whitney to begin with, even if they are several years younger.

by acasser on Jan 4, 2011 2:50 PM EST up reply actions  

luca caputi was a better return than a 2nd round pick. 2nd round picks really are not worth very much. yes, lots of 2nd round picks go on to be excellent players in the nhl, but it generally takes 5 or more years for them to even make it there. luca caputi was close to NHL ready. for a team that needs help right away, that’s a much better return than a 2nd.

agents would be idiots to want to block trades. one, it makes them not look like team players – it will make it difficult for them to get a no-trade in their next contract. two, a few playoff goals does wonders for a player’s value. if langenbrunner ends up with 10 goals but scores 5 in the playoffs, someone will be convinced that he’s good enough and will sign him for 2 years.

by Triumph44 on Jan 3, 2011 3:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Well. This is certainly a situation I am not familiar with handling, nor is Lou for that matter. With that said, there are a lot of good teams this year which works in the Devils’ favor.

a) there’s a lot of good teams, therefore the demand for a veteran player could be high in this youth-driven league.

b) with all the good, there are less bad teams. We happen to be the worst, so our players should in theory be in higher demand. That means a better return.

c) This draft is weak, so teams realizing this might be willing to part ways with higher draft picks. The draft is weak, but there is talent out there that needs to be scouted. The Devils might be willing to trade a pair of seconds or a 1st and 3rd this year for a 1st rounder next year.

Now, about this season: I’m not mad that we’re having a terrible year. I am extremely disappointed, and although I never felt this was a Stanley Cup team, I figured they would be over .500 and make it 5th or 6th seed, and once you make the show, you never know what could happen. The Devils were not build well this year. I questioned the team’s leadership last year, as well as early this year up to this date, and most people disagreed until now. I also don’t think the defense is even close to acceptable. There’s nobody who can make tape-to-tape passes, as John Fischer mentioned countless times in his previews and posts. The defense has been poor since the Stevens/Nieds/Rafalski trio left in that short time span. Losing one is manageable, but the Devils lost three excellent defensemen in a short time. Yeah, losing Martin didn’t help, but we didn’t have him last year and we were the #2 seed in the EC. That’s not an accident.

Now, as for trades, the list is both short and long in terms of players that could be and should be traded. It’s Hedberg, Greene, Arnott, Langenbrunner, and I could live with Zubrus, Clarkson going. If someone came up to Lou and offered the world, they can even have Brodeur, and Elias would be a last resort. Nobody would be idiotic enough to take Rolston, so Lou must eat that contract and deal with him for another season and a half. Colin White is the wild card in all of this. He could go if a) he wants to and b) everyone else goes and there is a demand for him. This season certainly favors the Devils as sellers, but unfortunately, the draft is not as strong as the past two or three.

I figure this: pair two of the veterans together. Arnott + Langenbrunner or Greene (2 of the 3) can likely draw a 1st rounder, maybe a 3rd rounder and/or a mid-quality prospect. None of those players are under contract beyond this season, so it’s very low-risk to teams with cap space. Andy Greene is more likely to draw a 2nd rounder if he is traded seperately, because he’s very cheap, and can be a top-4 defenseman on the right team. The suitors for Arnott and Langenbrunner, I mean, look no further than the Dallas Stars. There’s a team with Brad Richards’ contract expiring after this season, so they’re in a win-now phase, and they have plenty of cap space. Colorado could take them, so could Nashville, maybe Tampa Bay (not sure they really need more forwards in TB). Minnesota also has space if they decide they are buyers.

Zubrus could draw a second rounder by himself. There are drawbacks for Zubrus, though. His contract doesn’t expire until the end of the 2012-13 season, and his cap hit is a bit high for what he brings, $3.4M. Still, as far as I’m concerned, he’s more valuable to the Devils as trade bait right now. I don’t see him in the future plans of the Devils, as a winger or a center. The bottom line, though, for any team that could be interested, is that Zubrus once centered John LeClair in Philly (briefly), Briere in Buffalo, and Ovechkin in Washington.

I would assume in a league full of quality goaltenders that Johan Hedberg is worth a 3rd round draft pick, not too much more. I hate to undervalue him, because I like him from a personal level and professional level. The guy is a pro, he’s a great teammate and is a very respectable goalie on the ice, but he’s not a dominating star goalie, and there is a huge second tier of goaltenders. Still, better a 3rd rounder than nothing.

The other player that we could see go is David Clarkson. Apparently, Leaf fans are crazy about him, partially because he runs his charity in Toronto, and partially because…well, Leaf fans are crazy. Clarkson is not a top-6 forward, he’s proved that loud and clear this season. Clarkson was mentioned in the Kaberle trade rumors last year, and forgetting Kaberle is over 30 years old, I’d sign up for that trade now (Clarkson + Zharkov + 2nd rounder for Kaberle or something like that). Oh well, too late, they can keep Kaberle and have Clarkson if they offer a 2nd round pick to us. Not sure Burke would do that, though, after all, they had no 1st rounder last year and no 1st rounder this year.

Other than that, I can’t see Colin White getting traded. His deal doesn’t expire for a while, plus he’s a Lou-favorite. Rolston isn’t going anywhere, don’t kid yourself. The only other thing I would do is Lou needs to have a serious sitdown with Zach Parise about the future of Parise in NJ. If they start negotiating and trying to get a deal done here, great. Why wait?! If not, he needs to be put on the market. He can draw any prospect. We need an elite center of the future? A number one defenseman? Well, if it comes to this, trading Parise gets whatever Lou wants, and maybe a 1st rounder on top of that. I hope, however, that Parise re-signs here, because as I mentioned in my fan post today, he’s a one-of-a-kind player, and he’s worth more than draft picks.

Who else? Nobody else either has enough trade value to draw anything or it just doesn’t make sense to move them. Maybe Salmela draws a 5th rounder, but that makes no sense to do that. If someone comes begging to Lou asking for Zajac, they can have him if they give us a 1st rounder and a decent replacement.

DownGoesAvery. Check out my sarcastic/comedic blog: http://downgoesavery.blogspot.com/ and on Twitter (@DownGoesAvery).

by DownGoesAvery on Jan 3, 2011 3:09 PM EST reply actions  

Oh, and I also believe if Lou can get the right deal done now, do it. Why wait? It’s only delaying getting kids up to the NHL.

DownGoesAvery. Check out my sarcastic/comedic blog: http://downgoesavery.blogspot.com/ and on Twitter (@DownGoesAvery).

by DownGoesAvery on Jan 3, 2011 3:54 PM EST up reply actions  

As much as I like Parise, there is one trade I’d make with him that makes perfect sense for both teams involved: straight up for Shea Weber. We’re relatively stacked at LW, but need a #1 D-man. Nashville is stacked at defense but needs top-end scoring. Weber is their captain, but Parise is without a doubt captain material. Both are RFAs. Suter can take over as Nashville’s top D-man.

It would be tough to see Parise go, of course, but we desperately need a #1 D-man, and I can’t see how else we’d get our hands on one. Weber-Volchenkov would be a brutal shutdown pairing. Who would want to cross the blueline against those two?

I wouldn’t trade Parise for any combination of players of picks. Nothing less than another superstar.

1995 - 2000 - 2003

by bergenline on Jan 3, 2011 3:49 PM EST reply actions  

Although Shea Weber has a shot so hard he makes Drew Doughty cry himself to sleep every night, he’s only a 45 point man, at best. I know he’s a great defender, but he’s very good defenseman, not an elite, top-10 defenseman. Parise is an elite forward, the best 2-way forward, maybe a top-10 player in hockey. I’m sorry, I don’t see that as a fair trade.

DownGoesAvery. Check out my sarcastic/comedic blog: http://downgoesavery.blogspot.com/ and on Twitter (@DownGoesAvery).

by DownGoesAvery on Jan 3, 2011 3:53 PM EST up reply actions  

pavel datsyuk > zach parise in 2 way fowardness… but he is a top 10 in hockey

by KovyisLove on Jan 3, 2011 4:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Datsyuk is the most talented player. Period. Crosby is better statistically and a better player, but Datsyuk is the most talented. Parise, then Kesler.

DownGoesAvery. Check out my sarcastic/comedic blog: http://downgoesavery.blogspot.com/ and on Twitter (@DownGoesAvery).

by DownGoesAvery on Jan 3, 2011 4:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree with you that Weber for Parise would not be a good trade for us, however I do not see how Weber is not a top 10 d-man. Once Lidstrom retires Weber would have to be ranked as the #1 d-man in the league.

by Keiwi on Jan 3, 2011 6:57 PM EST up reply actions  

As bergenline said, I would not keep Parise off the table. He’s certainly a top 10 forward and top 5 LW in the league when he get’s going; he’s shown he can hang with the top in scoring, yet can also be among the highest CORSI, penalties drawn vs taken, and +/- in the league. He kills penalties from time to time, is pretty fast, isn’t afraid to play gritty in front of the net, and has leadership qualities.

Let me say first and foremost; I want Parise on our team. He’s a surefire player as compared to a prospect. But, seeing as he’s an RFA, we’re guaranteeing the trading partner the last months of the season (after he hopefully returns in February), playoffs, plus at least 1 year afterwards unless someone tries an offer sheet of they go to arbitration. He’s going to play for the trading partner no matter what. And teams that need a scoring left wing will pay out the nose for him. But like I implied; it has to be a great offer.

Maybe some sort of deal with Boston where we get Savard?

by skly27 on Jan 3, 2011 4:35 PM EST reply actions  

maybe some deal with TB where we get Stamkos?

DownGoesAvery. Check out my sarcastic/comedic blog: http://downgoesavery.blogspot.com/ and on Twitter (@DownGoesAvery).

by DownGoesAvery on Jan 3, 2011 4:54 PM EST up reply actions  

A late Christmas wish

I would love for New Jersey to somehow find a way to pry the LA Kings backup goaltender Bernier. He is young, talented, and possibly available. With Jonathan Quick established as the number one goalie there, that would be an obvious asset for them to move and an area of concern for the Devils in the near future. I just don’t know if there is a good match for LA.

by Devil in CT on Jan 3, 2011 4:57 PM EST reply actions  

Bernier is having a terrible year considering how much he was/has been hyped up to be. Quick is still a pretty young goalie I would rather have him

by Keiwi on Jan 3, 2011 6:58 PM EST up reply actions  

parise

i am not saying that i would want to see parise traded/moved, but if they reall wanted to move him they should let the word get out to ‘encourage’ any interested teams to sign him to an offer sheet next summer, he’d likely be offered a lot of money and the devils would wind up with some #1 draft choices from the signing team which might be the way to go if they wanted to reorganize the franchise, he is the asset that they could actually move and this would be the best way to maximize their return even if the return would be a long term matter…what do you folks think?

by don in central jersey on Jan 3, 2011 5:18 PM EST reply actions  

I think Lou should wait a few more games let the players prove that their poor play was the result of bad coaching decisions. But not wait too long that possible trading teams already fill voids. If the players show they are starting to get back on track I think what we get back might be a little higher then if we just tried to move them now.

by pshapiro on Jan 3, 2011 5:22 PM EST reply actions  

Yeah but if we play better and miss the playoffs in 10th or 11th place would be really bad id rathr stink sell and get the top 3 pick

by KovyisLove on Jan 3, 2011 5:32 PM EST up reply actions  

You obviously didn’t understand what I was saying…I want the players who we potential could sell before the trade deadline to start showing they they are actually worth something good in return on the trade market. Never said anything about the players coming together and playing flawless hockey just to be disappointed and miss the playoffs.

by pshapiro on Jan 3, 2011 5:44 PM EST up reply actions  


Now included free with purchase/trade of any NJ Devil athlete!!! (limited stock in both athlete and unicorn meat supplies…act now!)

"Look at my face. I came here to play a hockey game and look at my face." -Kris Draper

by HELLAWAITS on Jan 3, 2011 6:10 PM EST reply actions   3 recs

That jokes getting kind old you should probably look into finding new material.

by pshapiro on Jan 3, 2011 6:24 PM EST up reply actions  

That jokes getting kind old you should probably look into finding new material.

That sentence isn’t quite a complete sentence…you should probably look into finding a new English tutor. But thank you for your constructive criticism nonetheless…

"Look at my face. I came here to play a hockey game and look at my face." -Kris Draper

by HELLAWAITS on Jan 3, 2011 7:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Ha ha see the thing is I am not mad about your comment I could care less what you have to say. You got so mad that you’re so one dimensional with your responses that you had criticize me back.

by pshapiro on Jan 3, 2011 8:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe I’m missing something but could someone explain to me why we should go through the hassle of trying to trade Hedberg, and why a team would try and take him off our hands?
I mean he has a NTC, and he is only here for one year and is pretty close to being overpaid for. Why wouldn’t the team in question just wait for free agency and grab him for free and possibly at a lower price?

by Keiwi on Jan 3, 2011 7:00 PM EST reply actions  

If a team is trading for a rental like Langs or Arnott we aren’t gonna get anything that will help us in the near future. I think the best bet is to go for a pick. Any prospect we get probably won’t have that much upside. Also a pick can be used to make other deals.

by C.J. Richey on Jan 3, 2011 7:18 PM EST reply actions  

wud love to get bergfors back fron atlanta seeing as i was dissapoited to see him go in the kovalchuk trade. my dream wud to see him and tedenby on the same line with a elias or zubrus as they both play the same style and cud be a very effective one two punch with a solid center. i see this because atlanta might be willing to ship him out because he has been a healthy scratch for a number of recent games. giive up maybe a langebrunner salvador or arnott to atlanta as they have no playoff experienced veterans besides buff on the bluline

by longl on Jan 4, 2011 2:46 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the New Jersey Devils! New here? Check out the Rules and Guidelines before posting.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

The_official_web_site___new_jersey_devils_small
FOR THE LOVE OF THE DEVILS...PLEASE DON'T SELL YOUR TICKETS TO RANGERS FANS
Stanley_cup_wallpaper_small
Devils vs. Flyers -- Two Opposing Worlds Separated by 90 Miles

Recent FanPosts

Small
Line Changes...Again
Small
Cup or Bust?
31519_397927484582_78722009582_3938348_414926_n_small
Question for you NJ natives.
Claude_small
Post your press conference question(s) for John Tortorella here.
Pig_face_small
Mar-ty, Hen-ke
Small
Top Secret Agent or Cranky Middle Aged Man?
Small
Karma, and Pucks, and Chips Oh My,
Small
No Blue Campaign -- Tickets for Sale
Small
On Shot Blocking
Scott_stevens_2_small
Strategy Adjustments to Defeat the Rangers (IMO)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

joomla visitors

Managers

Stanley_cup_and_you_-_sbn_small John Fischer

Authors

Puddy_small Tom Stivali

Marty_sbetter_small Matthew Ventolo

Zidlickymania_small Kevin Sellathamby

1729_small Matt Evans SNC