Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: All Hail David Luiz

New Jersey Devils Decisively Defeated by the Pittsburgh Penguins 4-1

Tonight, the New Jersey Devils' first road trip of the 2011-12 season kicked off in Pittsburgh.   Simply put, it didn't go well at all.  After a poor performance last night at home against San Jose, the Devils were just inferior to the Pittsburgh Penguins this evening.  The Penguins got the drop on the Devils early on, picking off their clearances, getting easy stops on defense, and relentlessly crashing the net.  It was a poor start and in combination with a silly penalty by David Clarkson, Jordan Staal capped the Penguins' early dominance with a goal.

It didn't lead to a 60 minute beatdown; the Devils settled the game down after the goal.  In retrospect, those first 10 minutes was a sign that it was going to be a rather difficult game.   While the Devils did eventually out-shoot the Penguins in the first and second periods, the Penguins managed to rack more shooting attempts.   Teams don't attempt to make a shot unless they have the puck in their opponent's end of the rink, so it's evidence that possession was in Pittsburgh's favor.  Given that the Devils were down 1-0 through the second period, it was an ominous sign.

The third period came and then the beatdown was on.  Black and gold jerseys skated hard and fast for all 20 minutes. They kept tearing through the Devils' defense, constantly finding their teammates in the slot or around the crease.  When the Devils attempted to attack, they shut it down quickly.  They drew a few calls to help their cause, and they made them pay. Their lone spot on their game's performance was a shorthanded goal by Patrik Elias; but their quick response on the same power play re-took the lead and they never looked back.  

By the end of the game, the Penguins tacked on two more goals high-glove side on Johan Hedberg, finished the third 16-5 in shots (29-24 in total), and just made the Devils do more chasing than attacking.   This was a frustrating game for Devils fans to watch, and a disappointing performance by the players not unlike Friday's game against San Jose.  The Penguins partisans and fans, like those at PensBurgh, have every right to be pleased. Their favorite team played a strong game of hockey and even when up 4-1, they were looking for #5. As for the team we support, well, there's plenty to discuss about their deserved loss after the jump.

 

Star-divide

The Stats:  The NHL.com Game Summary | The NHL.com Event Summary | The NHL.com Play by Play Log | The Time on Ice Shift Charts | The Time on Ice Head to Head Ice Time Charts | The Time on Ice Corsi Charts

 

The Highlights: I'm not sure too many Devils fans want to see highlights in a 4-1 decisive loss to Pittsburgh, but for those who do, you can watch this video from NHL.com:

How to Shoot Yourself in the Collective Foot:  There are many ways for a hockey team to start off and continue to play poorly.  The Devils demonstrated several of them in their loss to Pittsburgh.  Let's go over them.

1. Puck Movement: The first is the tried-and-true issue of puck movement.  Call it not being in sync. Call it fatigue from playing the night before. Call it whatever you want.  It didn't matter if it was a defenseman, a winger, or a center; every Devils skater had some kind of errant pass or bad read that served to help out the Penguins more often than not.   Feel free to call out your preferred scapegoat, but this was prevalent among the entire roster.  At best, it just undercut whatever the Devils were doing and didn't lead to much. At worst, the Penguins took the puck and struck back twice as hard.

2. Defending The second is soft defensive coverage.  Penguins kept finding their teammates in the slot or down low with plenty of space quite often, more so as the game went on.  It's one thing to see this while they have a man advantage.  That's understandable to a point; they got one more skater on the ice than the defenders do.  That happens.  It's another - and far worse - to see it at even strength.   It's indicative that the Devils defense just weren't on point; and the Penguins made them pay for it twice to seal the Devils' fate this evening.  Pittsburgh recognized their coverage problems early and given that they often sent multiple players down low to crash the net or to overload behind the net, the Devils struggled with it all night long.  The coverage issues was exacerbated by the many soft clearances or passes that just resulted in stray pucks for the Penguins to get at to keep the play alive or the Devils to panic in trying to retain possession.   

3. Discipline Issues: The third are penalties.  As we've seen in the game against Philadelphia and San Jose to a point, just handing the opposition power plays hurts because it forces the killers to defend instead of attacking.   I'm sure there are some Devils fans upset with the referees tonight.  Some of the calls were a little cheap, such as the tripping call on Zach Parise.  Others were obvious calls, like David Clarkson high sticking Marc-Andre Fleury in the helmet and Adam Larsson grabbing Jordan Staal from behind.  The one that ultimately killed the Devils was a double-minor for high sticking on Petr Sykora, who didn't actually high-stick Steve Sullivan (and somehow drew blood, I guess?) - it was Patrik Elias' stick that did the deed. (Quick update: Per this post-game post by Tom Gulitti, Sykora intentionally went to the box for Elias' penalty.  The move worked.  No wonder the Pens were upset.)

Ironically, Elias scored the Devils' lone goal during that kill. Ilya Kovalchuk rushed up ice with the puck, slid a pass to the slot, and Elias banged it home.  It then tied the game and made Penguins head coach Dan Bylsma quite unhappy.   He and the Pens faithful became quite happy when Chris Kunitz slammed a one-timer from the left circle over Hedberg's left shoulder and in not long after.   The Penguins would never look back from that strike.

In any case, even if you feel the Devils were jobbed by the refs to a point for calls and non-calls (and there were a few of those), the Devils did themselves no favors by taking what they did.   Especially since two of those five calls were during Devils' power plays in the third period.   The damage: two power play goals out of 8 shots on net.

4. Relying on the Goalie to Bail You Out: Last night, the Devils stole a point against the Sharks due to Johan Hedberg playing out of their mind. Tonight, the Moose wasn't so magical.  Sure, he made his fair share of good saves.  Yet, he got beaten in the same spot on all four goals: high and glove side.  The first two weren't his fault, they were one-timers on the power play, possibly didn't see the first shot, and definitely didn't see the second.  He did himself no favors by going low too early on the third (Staal's second goal) and fourth (by James Neal). At least there weren't any puck-handling gaffes outside of the crease.

But this point goes back to the second point.  The Devils got rolled in the third period 16-5 in shots; and since the end of the first period, the Penguins became positive in team Corsi.   Hedberg didn't get much help from the guys in front of him, and if it wasn't for a few fortunate misses and bounces of the puck, then the Penguins would have scored more than 4 goals that Hedberg had no chance on.   Even on the latter two goals, the Devils defense had played a role on those plays. Bryce Salvador was very ineffectual on Staal; and Mark Fayne's decision to move towards the corner led to Neal having the space to turn and shoot on Hedberg up close. 

Essentially, if you're relying on your goaltender to bail you out, then you're just playing with fire. It worked on Friday. It didn't work tonight.

5. Not Capitalize on Offensive Opportunities, Not Get Bounces:  The Devils managed to get a lead on San Jose early enough such that when the Sharks imposed their will, the Devils had a cushion on the scoreboard. The Devils didn't have that tonight.   They had a few good chances in the first period on Marc-Andre Fleury, which were either snuffed out by Fleury himself or a puck just not bouncing to where it would they would like it to be.  Every line had their moment of close-to-glory, even the fourth line had a chance in my opinion. 

Yet, the Devils couldn't consistently attack against Pittsburgh due to their puck movement problems and that their defense not being strong enough to repel the Penguins to counter-attack.   This means that when they had an opportunity, they had to make the most of it. They really didn't outside of the one shorthanded chance they did score on.  Even if Pittsburgh didn't put two more goals past the Devils in the third, the Devils just struggled to attack so much that I doubt they would have gotten a second goal in this one.  It also didn't help that Fleury was playing pretty well.

The Result of All of This: The Devils were a miserable -19 in Corsi.  It's worse than it looks. They were -3 at the end of the second period, so the Penguins enjoyed the better of possession even though they were winning. That's evidence that the Penguins were in some control of the game.  In the third period, they dominated it by stretching it out by 13.  By the way, Time on Ice only counts Corsi for even strength situations.  Again: the Penguins dominated in the third period.

In all situations, the Penguins put up 29 shots, got blocked 21 times, and missed the net 21 times.  That's a massive 71 attempts by a team that was leading for much of the game.  It's also 30 more than the Devils had all game (24 shots, 14 blocked, 3 misses).  It's hard to win any game that way.  It's hard to watch too.

Collected Thoughts: Since I feel the above summed up how I think the Devils lost this game - and full credit to the Penguins, they played a very good game of hockey this evening (especially Mr. Staal with 2 goals on 5 SOG) - I'm tossing some other observations in this game:

- Ilya Kovalchuk didn't play over 30 minutes, just 21:05 in fact.  If you didn't want to see that, then, well, you got it.  He also didn't have a shot on net, which isn't good at all.  I'm still trying to comprehend that fact.  He was a playmaker for most of the night, as evidenced by his assist on Elias' goal and the fact that Nick Palmieri (somehow) got 5 shots on net.   Still, Kovalchuk didn't have a good night, but I'm hopeful he'll be better in the future.

- Match-ups largely went against the Devils, which is obvious given how well the Penguins played. The only Devils who finished positive in Corsi were Zach Parise (+8), Petr Sykora (+5), and Elias (+2).  I wouldn't praise that line too much, though. They combined for only 6 shots: 1 from Parise, 2 from Sykora, and 3 from Elias. Their match-up shifted in this game, as they saw 3 defenders more often (Paul Martin, Zybnek Michalek, Brooks Orpik) than a single line (a mix of the Richard Park line and the Joe Vitale line) They didn't get the Jordan Staal line like Kovalchuk-Zubrus-Palmieri did; who kicked the Zubrus' line all over the place.  With the Devils being on the road, they didn't have much control on who faced who.  Since the Penguins collectively beat on most of the Devils line up, it probably didn't matter.

- Bryce Salvador really struggled from the beginning tot he end.  Getting turned by Staal was hard to watch.

- I'm not quite sure how Rod Pelley ended up -11 in Corsi but Brad Mills and Cam Janssen were each at -2.  I guess there were a few shifts where #10 was caught out there and got rolled over?  Maybe after some PKs?  Blech.

- Cam Janssen had a shot on net. Mark this night as the first one this season where Janssen made a hockey move that kind of worked.

- Adam Henrique had a rough go in his first game after the call up.  David Clarkson sprung him for a great offensive opportunity in the first period, but Fleury stopped him.  From then on, he became more and more invisible. He played 15:43 and a good chunk of it in his own end of the rink (-14 Corsi). 

- I'm tempted to say that the Devils playing 65 minutes the night prior didn't help. Then again, I don't think the Devils were skating slowly or without energy.  Their poor puck-movement just made it look like the Pens were really fast.  Besides, it's not like the Penguins aren't tired since they played 3 games earlier this week.

- While Adam Larsson's penalty was dumb, I felt he did better tonight than he did last night in his 22:38 of ice time.  He actually had 3 shots on net and he wasn't beaten like a drum unlike, say, Salvador. I'm tempted to say he was the Devils' best skater.  However, I don't really want to name a best skater on the Devils after a game like this.

Lastly, bad games happen. The Devils played two in a row, got one point out of the two, and didn't really deserve even that.  The team will have two days to get it together before they visit Los Angeles on Tuesday.  Let's hope they get right to work on Sunday. 

That's my take on tonight's game.  What's yours? How frustrated are you after a game like this? Do you think the Devils will turn it around in LA, or are these two games indicative of larger problems?  What do you think the Devils need to do from within to fix this? Do they need outside help?  Or is it way, way, way, way too early in the season to worry about that?   Please leave your answers and other thoughts on this game in the comments.  Thanks to everyone in the Gamethread who read and commented this evening; and thank you for reading.

Comment 43 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

We will prevail!

I will have to say tonight’s game was a letdown no doubt. The biggest problem I saw tonight was the passing and the energy from the team oh yeah let’s not forget the stupid penalties. They looked tired and of course the Sharks game yesterday was a tough game for them. They never got a chance to build momentum even with the short handed goal by Elias. I think we can move on and try to work out the kinks before the L.A. game. I have faith in DeBoer. Let’s Go Devils!

by Tony732 on Oct 22, 2011 11:28 PM EDT reply actions  

Outside of 9,26 & 17 this team is comprised of roll players & youngsters. The Devils will be competitive this season, but elite teams will mostly get the better of them because of talent & continuity. We have to hope to see improvement & consistency from Teddy, Larsson, Henrique & Palms as the season progresses but in all honesty I don’t think we are going to be much of a threat this year.

by Pillowhands on Oct 23, 2011 12:23 AM EDT reply actions  

Very good observation

I was noting the same thing and so I did a little comparing. The Devils have only 5 players who have scored goals. When I looked up some of the other better teams in the league, the average was 12 to 13 (included the Caps, Penguins, Red Wings, Flyers, Black Hawks)

Its only 6 games in, but some of these younger guys are going to have to step up if the team is going to more than a low playoff seed at best.

Palmieri, Tedenby, Greene, Larsson need to be more of a threat. I know its a lot to ask of Larsson at 18, but he has no points through 6 games

Also, one guy I am starting to get disappointed in is Volchenkov. i don’t expect him to be an offensive D man, but as our highest paid D guy, I expect him to create some plays. Where are the big hits from him?

The greatest accomplishment is not in never falling, but in rising again after you fall. - Vince Lombardi

by Devilssection21fan on Oct 23, 2011 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

How much of a buzz would we have got if Henrique had scored on his big chance in the first period. On moments like these, games turn.

by AlienDev on Oct 23, 2011 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

They just ran out of gas in the 3rd

They had a much better 2nd. Back to back games against SJ and Pit can’t be easy. I’m not too worried unless we drop one against the Kings.

by Scoob1978 on Oct 23, 2011 12:39 AM EDT reply actions  

The Kings game on their ice, with them looking for revenge, is not a great place to have to go to break back to back defeats. The team is going to have to dig deep out there.

by AlienDev on Oct 23, 2011 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Great summary. The only part I disagree with is your thoughts on Henrique.

I can’t say enough that I’m not a Henrique fan boy and I haven’t watched him play much at all. In fact, this is only the second time I’ve watched him throughout a full game.

However, I think the difference between people saying he played great tonight or just so-so is whether or not that breakaway goal goes in. Unfortunately for all of us it didn’t, but I still thoroughly enjoyed watching him. Because of the injury to Josefson led to the call-up for Henrique, my first thoughts were to compare their two styles of play.

One distinct thing I noticed is that Henrique is much less afraid of physical contact than Josefson. If you watch you will notice Henrique dart after pucks in the offensive zone and work to fish them out to safety or a teammate before worrying about being hit. I don’t know the exact ht/wt stats for Josefson compared to Henrique but visually they don’t look much different to me. Regardless, Josefson always seemed to shy away from contact and this often so it was a breath of fresh air to see Henrique play fearless and skate hard after loose pucks.

More time and games will obviously tell whether or not Henrique will be able to keep up his agressive and up-tempo playing style, or whether he will succumb to the wear and tear of an NHL season and slowly regress into a more conservative player.

I know people don’t agree or don’t “think he’s ready” but I still want to see him play with Kovalchuk but not as badly
as I want to see Tedenby play with Kovalchuk. I am dying for DeBoer to simply tell a rookie that it is their primary goal as a line mate of Kovalchuk to be his playmaker. Kovalchuk can’t be depended on to be the one who has to bring the puck into the zone and also put it in the net. He thrived in Atlanta when there were line mates that played unselfishly and gave him beautiful feeds. Tedenby has more than the potential to be the shifty, elusive, and crafty playmaker that could allow Kovy to wander/get open and then hit him with a pass for a one timer or heavy wrister.

by NJallDay on Oct 23, 2011 12:48 AM EDT reply actions  

I’d rather see Teddy on Parise and Elias’ line. Sykora just isn’t quick enough for that line.

Palmieri is doing OK on Kovy’s RW. I’m not a fan of his, but you need a guy who’s willing to shoot and not just pass it to Kovy all the time. In the first few games, Palmieri looked lost and was trying to force the puck to Kovy too often, but once he got his game going and gained some confidence, you saw him shooting more and the line as a whole was much more effective. Kovy is both the playmaker and the shooter for his line. The best thing you can do is keep teams honest by putting a guy who can shoot on his line.

by dr(d)evil on Oct 23, 2011 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

On a side note did anyone see Tortorellas “press conference” after the Rags got blanked by the Oilers tonight? Every time I hear him talk I thank god he isn’t our coach. He’s a complete jerk and won’t even speak to reporters after a loss. It’ll definitely be interesting to watch him on HBO this year, and even moreso if the Rags continue to play terribly.

by NJallDay on Oct 23, 2011 12:56 AM EDT reply actions  

Something is working wrong with Kovalchuk obviously, I don’t know why but even if his teammates are unable to make him some room, I clearly remember a perfect sniping position in the 2nd period where he SHOULD’ve shot, but he didn’t. That was awkward.
Nonetheless it"s always the same problem here, we’ve got some scoring chances but we don’t score enough goals already.

I’m not a fan of “Lou should do this or should do that”, but for next year I hope he will sign at least one gifted forward, center or RW to help this team in the offensive area.

"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"

by Elektrostal_Kid on Oct 23, 2011 1:59 AM EDT reply actions  

Don’t forget Zajac isn’t playing. You lose your #1 Center on a team filled with young forwards and I’m going to say inexperienced scoring depth. Its a major gaping whole. I know all teams have injuries they must get through…Its also still early.

by NJDOhio on Oct 23, 2011 2:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

After the 1st 5 minutes of the Devs playing whos got it; no I thought you had it ,trying to get out of their zone, they settled in and played a good 30 minutes and seemed to be on the verge of taking the game over. The 3rd period just seemed to be a case of a great shot by Kunitz and Stall was on fire tonight. 2 great individual efforts and I don’t think the boys had anything left in the tank unfortunately.

Njallday has it right that Henrique is going to be a player but its going to take some time for him to adjust which is what the Devs should give him. Josefson was a big loss as I was starting to like what I was seeing from him and his skillset. I know Palms gets bashed here a lot but again patience is the key with this big kid; to me hes getting closer each game. Unless LL pulls something out of his ash this is going to be a rough stretch until team finds some consistency. I hate Sykora and now regret the Devs signing him and Zubes is not a center so I’d like to see Clarkie up to 1st line RW, Henrique centering 2nd line duties; Teddy up on that lines RW and have Sykie centering Zubes and Palms.
I’m pretty convinced Brad Mills is not an NHL player but I still think Pelly is serviceable and should be the 4th line center or even handle 3rd line duties until LL makes trade or signs someone because Sykora makes me sick bleehhh…

by 68devils on Oct 23, 2011 7:01 AM EDT reply actions  

Sykora might not be doing as well as he did in the preseason, but its only been 5 games and he’s been out of the NHL awhile. I want to give it more time before I pass judgement, but as of now, for the cheap price he took, I can live with his play.

Also, you gotta hand it to him. He pulled an unselfish and crafty maneuver last night by sitting in the box when it should’ve been Patty. He deserves an assist on the goal for that alone.

by SonicJoe on Oct 23, 2011 9:38 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the NHL suspend Sykora for that penalty-swap move.

by AlienDev on Oct 23, 2011 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

No way. It’s the refs fault they couldn’t tell who did it.

And Kovalchuk speeds away, great moves, busting through, DID YOU SEE THAT?

by KovyisLove on Oct 23, 2011 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

I suspect a new penalty will be created. I would expect an additional minor or a game misconduct to be handed out if this ever happens again. We can call it the “Sykora Rule”.

by SonicJoe on Oct 23, 2011 12:13 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

This isn’t the first time and it will not be the last time it’s happened. It’s part of the game, albeit rare.

by Sn0 on Oct 23, 2011 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

There aren’t grounds for a suspension here. Besides which, a good chunk of the blame has to go to the referee — he saw the penalty, and he’s the one who should have made sure he got the right player in the box.

On the other hand, I could see a fine being handed down for that sort of thing. I could also see some sort of memo come out from the League Office about the situation and advising teams not to try it. Of course, said memo will be completely forgotten the next time someone gets tapped on the noggin, or the next time Sidney Crosby takes part in practice, or whatnot.

by acasser on Oct 23, 2011 9:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Especially since Sykora admitted it in an interview (that he intentionally went to the box), I could see a fine.

by SonicJoe on Oct 23, 2011 10:22 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

This isn’t a “new” trick. I’ve seen this before happen.

I’ve also seen the refs call the penalty on the wrong player and put the wrong player in the box.

by NJDOhio on Oct 23, 2011 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Where was Kovalchuk?

What was with Kovy on Staal’s second goal? A lazy shift change at the worst possible time! That was something you don’t even see in pee wee hockey. It’s enough to make a coach have a stroke. I’m not making exscuses for Salvador’s poor play. He can only blame himself for that. However, he was left out to dry by his teamate and I’d be pretty ticked off if I were him.

by Sn0 on Oct 23, 2011 9:58 AM EDT reply actions  

DeBoer already said per TG that Kovy getting off the ice had NOTHING to do with that goal…and if you watched closely, it really didn’t..

by Marty's Better #30 on Oct 23, 2011 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

The entire right side was wide open. Staal just waltzed in unopposed. Defense first…

by Sn0 on Oct 23, 2011 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree defense first. Bryce Salvador, who was right in front of him, should have kept pace or did something to disrupt Staal. He was the defenseman, he was in a position to make a play, but he didn’t. He got burned.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Oct 23, 2011 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Absolutely. But does that absolve Kovalchuk? Not on the teams I grew up with.

by Sn0 on Oct 23, 2011 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

It doesn’t matter what teams you saw growing up. See, here’s the thing: Salvador was in a position to make a play. It didn’t matter whether Kovalchuk was coming off, staying on, or whatever. If you’re faulting any Devil on Staal’s second goal, it has to be Salvador because he was the one who could have done something but didn’t. Not Kovalchuk, not Henrique, not Clarkson, and not Larsson; but Salvador.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Oct 23, 2011 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Salvador was in a position to make a play and didn’t. But the fact that Kovalchuk wasn’t even involved with the play at all is my point.

by Sn0 on Oct 23, 2011 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

I completely agree with you. Not sure what kind of hockey John is used to watching, but when it’s the second period and the game is at even strength, you don’t glide to the opposite bench for a change with the puck in the defensive zone. How can you possibly completely absolve Kovalchuk, for all you know Salvador saw Kovalchuk do it and tried to split the difference between his assignment and what should have been Kovalchuk’s. Look at Tedenby when he came on for him, he tried to sprint into the zone, didn’t make it before Staal scored, and immediately whipped around to face the bench with a look like “WTF was that?” Unbelievable that anyone would try to make excuses for something like that.

"On a scale of 1-10, I'd have to say 60 to 65 percent"
-NBA Union rep Billy Hunter

by Jersey_Puck on Oct 23, 2011 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

The problem on that play was a turnover at our own blue line. Kovalchuk was on his way towards the bench already to make a change and possibly tip the puck on the way out. Staal was already moving into the offensive zone. The sequence from when the puck was turned over to when Staal took all of two seconds, and there wasn’t any chance Kovalchuk was going to do anything about it from the neutral zone facing his own bench. I don’t fault Salvador either – Staal was bearing down on him full speed and made a great play.

by dr(d)evil on Oct 23, 2011 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

^ this

Question the time of Kovalchuks change if you like. But there is no way at the time of the turnover he could have stopped that.

I don’t blame Salvador either. Blame Clarkson and/or Henrique. Can’t tell from the replay but one of them had the puck on the boards. They where next to each other. There wasn’t a Penguin at all on the left side.

by NJDOhio on Oct 23, 2011 11:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Now these are legitimate responses abd good points. Thank you. It was the coasting to the opposite bench that made this look like a lazy play on Kovalchuk’s part. Possession/location of the puck means everything on a change like that. And if the zone isn’t cleared safely you don’t change shifts. Anyhow Cheers

by Sn0 on Oct 24, 2011 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Again, Salvador showed that he’s the worst Devils defenseman last night and in the Sharks game. HE needs to step it up or we bring someone else in, no offense and right now, no defense.

And Kovalchuk speeds away, great moves, busting through, DID YOU SEE THAT?

by KovyisLove on Oct 23, 2011 11:29 AM EDT reply actions  

Taught multiple lessons on Special Teams

I hope that the Devils look carefully at the Pens special teams work from this game. I saw two classic examples on the Pens PP and two more on their PK.

Their first PP goal made us look silly. We had a static box (as we did much of the night on PK). They had a center blueline QB, one on each half-board, one centerman in the middle of our box and one floater (floating either as a screen or down low). For the goal, the floater was working their left wing low, back to the wing, through a seam and a one-timer goal from a perfect slot. I’d welcome some thoughts from players and strategy experts on how to play this PK better, but I assume you cannot permit the centerman to get free in the middle of our defensive box like that.

Their second PP goal had pretty much the same formation, except the floater was in tighter. Fair play to them – the shot from their right wing was sweet. I thought Moose left his post too exposed especially given the wing was quite tight to the boards, and the same for the final 2 goals too, so something for him to work on.

Their PP in general … sharp. Quick gain of the zone, no dump and chase, fast into formation, crisp passes, really looking like they want to score within 20 secs. Some thoughts on our PP relative to this: we tend to have 2 on the blueline, then two on the top of the circle and a floater. So we are down a man on pressure, versus the Pens formation, and we typically wait 60+ seconds for a fairly static blast from Kovy’s spot (to of the circle +- one stick length!!) which the goalie patiently waits for! How I would like to see a Devs PP formation like the Pens!

On the PK … such as it was with the decisions yesterday … wow were they aggressive! When they got it out of the zone, our laissez faire attitude linked to their aggression was crazy to see. They put two into our defensive zone, one hard in, the other trailing. As a result, not only were they blocking in center-ice, but even giving us difficulty getting out of our own zone. On both our PP’s (if you can call them that), we took over 30 secs to gain the zone, and even then did some dump and chase. Trying to pass flat across our blueline, the Pens are up hard, blocking it and chasing us right to our back boards.

Getting us to draw penalties to kill both our PP’s was I think a direct result of frustration at not getting things going. I.e. the Pens lesson to us is that being really aggressive on PK can really throw the opponents off their game and into giving away dumb penalties as the forecheck pressure mounts. And I can see easily why they are #1 on PK.

Our PP in general … I don’t know, because I never saw us get it going! But damn – we need some aggression in the first 10-15 seconds to get it going. (By the way – way to win an offensive face-off and end up in our own zone!)

So – I hope that the Dev’s coaching staff clip these segments and play them a few dozen times for the team to think about on their road-trip.

Thoughts on this PP/PK analysis?

by AlienDev on Oct 23, 2011 11:36 AM EDT reply actions  

Henrique’s CORSI is misleading. There was 3 or 4 shifts where he took over midshift for the Zubrus line or Mlls line in their own end with Salvador and Volchenkov stuck on the ice. They got peppered in these shifts given the defense’s inability to do anything but get stripped of the puck.

I thought he showed the best energy and along with Clarkson and Tedenby, surely had the best shifts in the game in terms of cycling and possession. Henrique is a bull along the boards.

by MacIsaacFC on Oct 23, 2011 1:00 PM EDT reply actions  

A fair point on Henrique. As far as cycling and possession goes, I can only recall one shift where they did that to a point. It was good, but it didn’t lead to much since Orpik pasted Tedenby along the boards and took the puck. But maybe I’m forgetting others.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Oct 23, 2011 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

This team needs to stop with the penalties to get some flow in their 5-on-5 game.

I wonder if the team is still trying to figure out what DeBoer wants in terms of break out passes. Where should the players be – what to look for – what’s the best decision against a strong forecheck (Philly, San Jose, and Pittsburgh all had that). When their neutral zone play isn’t good – everything goes wrong.

In Lou We Trust: SBN Blog of the New Jersey Devils

by Matthew Ventolo on Oct 23, 2011 2:12 PM EDT reply actions  

That happens with every team, the neutral zone is the key for every system… ever.

And Kovalchuk speeds away, great moves, busting through, DID YOU SEE THAT?

by KovyisLove on Oct 23, 2011 9:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

  One of the biggest problems the last two game was their inability to come out of their own zone smooth. They kept messing up and then getting bottled up in there as the pens would forcheck. So they gotta staighten that out pretty quick. In the games that they won that wasn’t happening, they were coming out with neat little outlet plays supporting the puck well and then they were leaving the zone with speed and as a group and on their way to the attack. Thats what they got to get back to. It seems like things turned for the bad on the weekend when J.J. got hurt. They were playing great up to that point. Then it felt like a collective sag.
  Even though it took J.J. to get hurt, I like the fact that Henrique is getting a chance to play now. I’m in support of this guy. It’s gonna take a couple games for him to get a feel for things but once he does I think he will be fine. I lke him at 3rd line center and think he can handle it at the stage he is in his carrer. But I think with his skill and potential and the fact that he will eventually be a top 6 player, Deboer should really at least give him a few shifts centering Kovi and Palms. That way they can put Zubrus back with Parise and Elias cause from what I saw on Friday from that line the sharks couldn’t handle them at all. They can put Syky at 3rd line center. I think Syky is too slow to be on the top two lines anyway. At least try it out cause there really isn’t much difference between J.J. and Herique other than Henrique plays more of a north american brand of hockey. Henrique doesn’t have as much experience as J.J. but it looks like thats gonna change this year. Remember, Henrique is older that J.J. If he can handle it well than great, go with it.
  Another thing thats really getting to me is these two goons we have. I wish they would just send Jansens down already. Only cause he has the two way contract. As far as I’m concerned I don’t care which one they send down. I wish they would call Zharkov back up. I think Mills, Zharkov and Pelley/ Boulton would be a great 4th line. Plus when Deboer decides to double shift Kovi, he has some guys that can skate with him and Zharkov is good defensively and can be used on the p.k. By the way, I don’t care what anybody says on this site I like Mills. He is perfect for a 4th line center. That was a nice check he put on Staal last night. I don’t see where he’s having trouble with the speed of the game or anything like that and he seems to do alright on faceoffs also.

by maliky on Oct 23, 2011 5:32 PM EDT reply actions  

I think Mills is playing well too. Can’t expect much more out of a 4th line center and he does everything – hitting, defending, carrying/passing the puck competently. He’s been significantly better than his linemates and deserves the extra ice time and protection from being a healthy scratch.

I also wish they would call up Zharkov to play the 4th line and some PK. Especially now that we’re using TEDENBY on the PK after Josefson’s injury. That’s probably a really bad idea.

by dr(d)evil on Oct 23, 2011 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I also wish they would call up Zharkov to play the 4th line and some PK. Especially now that we’re using TEDENBY on the PK after Josefson’s injury. That’s probably a really bad idea.

zharkov is currently injured. also i don’t think the PK is that hard to play for a forward.

Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines

by Triumph44 on Oct 24, 2011 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bottom line, the Devils lost all the little battles in the 3rd period. They spent a lot of time on systems work this week in practice but I’d like to see them work on some one-on-one battles and boardwork. It might not have made a difference last night because they were probably just plain tired.

by dr(d)evil on Oct 23, 2011 10:41 PM EDT reply actions  

That was what I thought as well. Pittsburgh outworked us in races for the puck and in the corner.

by MacIsaacFC on Oct 24, 2011 3:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

I drove to Pittsburgh to check out this game… in case you were wondering about our away attendance in pittsburgh me and only about 9 total other devils fans were in the stands from what I saw, and I had plenty of time to look around. The third period was an emotional piggyback that just got away from us, also I don’t care what is said we played a good second period… go dev’s

by 5th Shift on Oct 24, 2011 3:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the New Jersey Devils! New here? Check out the Rules and Guidelines before posting.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

The_official_web_site___new_jersey_devils_small
FOR THE LOVE OF THE DEVILS...PLEASE DON'T SELL YOUR TICKETS TO RANGERS FANS
Stanley_cup_wallpaper_small
Devils vs. Flyers -- Two Opposing Worlds Separated by 90 Miles

Recent FanPosts

Small
Line Changes...Again
Small
Cup or Bust?
31519_397927484582_78722009582_3938348_414926_n_small
Question for you NJ natives.
Claude_small
Post your press conference question(s) for John Tortorella here.
Pig_face_small
Mar-ty, Hen-ke
Small
Top Secret Agent or Cranky Middle Aged Man?
Small
Karma, and Pucks, and Chips Oh My,
Small
No Blue Campaign -- Tickets for Sale
Small
On Shot Blocking
Scott_stevens_2_small
Strategy Adjustments to Defeat the Rangers (IMO)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

joomla visitors

Managers

Stanley_cup_and_you_-_sbn_small John Fischer

Authors

Puddy_small Tom Stivali

Marty_sbetter_small Matthew Ventolo

Zidlickymania_small Kevin Sellathamby

1729_small Matt Evans SNC