Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Events Cause Mariners To Lose To Rangers

New Jersey Devils Come From Behind, Weather Storms in 3-2 Shootout Win Over Washington Capitals

This game was a lot closer on paper than it seemed on the ice.   Sure, the game required overtime and a shootout to decide a winner.  Of course, I'm pleased that the New Jersey Devils got it in the shootout over the Washington Capitals.  However, I was also pleased that the Devils somehow escaped the third period with a 2-2 scoreline.  The home team pressured the Devils heavily throughout the third period, yet somehow, they couldn't re-take the lead.  Not on extended shifts, or on a late power play that carried over into overtime.

I emphasize the Capitals' pressure up front due to the game's boxscore.  Despite the Capitals spending plenty of time in the Devils' end of the rink for stretches in the second and third periods, they were credited with only 6 shots on net in those two periods combined.  Yes, the Capitals were held to 6 shots.   By the boxscore, it would seem that the the Caps let the Devils back into the game as they were up 2-0 and somehow couldn't get their offense going in the third period.   It would suggest that the Devils defense just shut down the Capitals. That really was not the case as I was watching the game.  Just like it wasn't the case that the Devils were so poor for the first 10 minutes of the first period when they were out-shot 7-2 since the Devils missed the net 6 times during that stretch.    The game did feature a lot of blocked shots and missed shots along with possession that didn't necessarily lead to shooting attempts.  Hence, the shot count was skewed low for both sides in that regard. So, no, tonight's game was not a defensive struggle with the Devils only out-shooting the Caps 19-17.  The attempts tell a more complete story, and it was even 50-50 at the end of 65 minutes.

Here's a summary of how each period went:  The Devils didn't look good in the first period and deserved to go down 2-0 based on their errors.  The Devils got pinned back quite a bit in the second period, but managed to muster up enough offense to get back in the game. Petr Sykora fired another lovely shot off a faceoff to get the Devils on the board; and Ryan Carter re-directed a Bryce Salvador pass perfectly during a good Devils shift to tie it up.  In the third period, the Caps kept attacking and when the scorer had to credit the Caps with a SOG, it was because Johan Hedberg came up big.  Basically, I was very pleased the Devils even got a point out of the game based on the performance, never mind having the opportunity to get the second.

Fortunately, the Devils managed to steal the second one.  The overtime period was better for the Devils, save for one heart-stopping shot at the beginning that Hedberg thankfully stopped.  The shootout came and the Devils succeeded on the strength of Zach Parise and David Clarkson displaying a backhand shot I never knew he had.  In effect, the Devils made a come back, weathered several storming attacks by the Caps, and edged out a road win over a top team in the East.  

There's much to point out, but let's talk about that after the jump.  For the opposition's take on this game, please check out the recap J.P. wrote at Japers' Rink.

Star-divide

The Stats:  The NHL.com Game Summary | The NHL.com Event Summary | The NHL.com Play by Play Log | The NHL.com Shot Summary | The Time on Ice Shift Charts | The Time on Ice Head to Head Ice Time Charts | The Time on Ice Corsi Charts

 

The Highlights:  This highlight video from NHL.com contains two Capitals goal, Sykora scoring yet again off a faceoff, and Carter scoring his first goal as a Devil.  Enjoy:

The Difference Between Corsi and Fenwick: As they both approximate possession in a game, I'm a fan of Corsi and Fenwick numbers. The difference between the two is that Corsi takes all shooting attempts into account while Fenwick ignores blocked shots.   That difference was pronounced tonight as the Devils had been blocked 14 times while the Capitals were blocked 22 times. Yeah, there were that many blocks according to the scorer at the Verizon Center. Your leaders in attempts blocked on both sides were Adam Larsson for the Devils with 5 and Alexander Ovechkin with 8. Yeah, Ovechkin was denied 8 times.   In terms of who was doing the blocking, get some ice for Mark Fayne as he had 8 of them.   It was more spread out for Washington; Brooks Laich, who lined up as a defenseman, blocked 4 shots.

Anyway, because of all of those blocks, it's a bit hard to get a grasp on who had more possession.  In terms of Corsi, it's the Capitals who were +4 in regulation at even strength.   Unsurprisingly, their line of Ovechkin, Nicklas Backstrom, and Joel Ward were the most successful in that regard.  That makes sense, since that's a combination of two all star forwards and a hard-working winger.  On the Devils, two thirds of the Elias line did well: Dainius Zubrus and Patrik Elias. Somehow, Sykora was a -3 by the end of the night.   However, if you focus on Fenwick, the Devils were the superior team at evens with a +4.   With those values, Zach Parise (0 to +5) and Adam Henrique (-3 to +7) looked much better than they were by Corsi.  The Henrik Tallinder and Mark Fayne pairing would be positive by Fenwick yet at zero in Corsi.   Some Devils were negative by both values, but Fenwick suggests a better Devils performance when it came to attempts.

Basically, I'm just throwing up my hands and moving on.

The Power Play Did Not Give Up Any Shorthanded Goals Tonight:  There's your main positive for the Devils' power play this evening.

I will credit the coaches for taking Patrik Elias off the right point and putting Andy Greene on one of the units.  That was a smarter move.  Yet, I can't really say the Devils were much better on the power play tonight than they were last night.  It didn't hurt the Devils, but it really could have helped - and didn't.  Sure, they got 6 shots on net over 5 opportunities instead of 4 out of 5 opportunities last night.  Sure, they didn't allow any shorthanded shots against.  Sure, the second power play they had looked pretty good.  Yet, as a whole, they still went 0-for-5 and they struggled on later power plays to either get the puck into the Caps' end or to keep possession when they did cross the blueline.    Basically, the Devils really miss Ilya Kovalchuk in this regard as well as some new ideas for man advantage strategies.

Penalty Kill Remains Hot:  The other side of special teams remains undeterred.  OK, John Carlson's shot at the point that became the Capitals' second goal was fired just as their second power play was ending, so the PK got saved by the clock from allowing a goal.   Still, the Devils killers prevented a very strong Washington power play from ruining their evening.  Over 5 shorthanded situations lasting a total of 9:17, the Devils only allowed 4 shots on net. That's excellent when taken as a whole.  Though, I will say that it wasn't so excellent that one of those shots came from Dennis Wideman wide open in the slot near the end of the power play time that carried over into OT.  Seriously, no Devil was near him.  Thankfully, Hedberg stopped him. 

The most common killers tonight were Bryce Salvador, Tallinder, Andy Greene, and Elias who each played over 4 minutes on the penalty kill this evening.  Not to detract from the rest of the penalty killers, but these four were huge tonight.

A Devils Rookie Committed Another Horrid Defensive Zone Turnover:  Tonight, it wasn't by Adam Larsson.  In fact, I don't recall any heinous giveaways by Larsson that made me cringe.  That's good from the now-19-year-old defenseman, who had a solid night on defense.

No, the horrid turnover came from Adam Henrique.  He had the puck in his own end and instead of chipping the puck off the boards or skating it out of the zone himself, he forces a pass into coverage less than 10 feet away from him.   Troy Brouwer easily picks it off, skates in, and beats Hedberg high.  That was how the Capitals got on the board.  No, Henrique did not get an assist on the goal.

As a whole, Henrique's had better nights.  He missed the net 4 times and missed the net in the shootout, both of which are ancillary to his big, terrible significant moment of the evening.  It wasn't all awful, though.  He did play a lot of minutes (22:12 total); he won most of his draws (13-for-21); and he did see Washington's top line more than their other forward lines. 

The Match-Up Mix-Up Again:  Looking at the head to head match-ups, it's clear that both Peter DeBoer and Bruce Boudreau were mixing things up.   The Backstrom line saw most of their ice time against a mixture of the Devils' top two lines - the Henrique line more so than the Elias line.  Meanwhile, DeBoer kept the Larsson-Greene pairing away from Ovechkin as much as possible, instead throwing Salvador-Volchenkov and Fayne-Tallinder at him.  It definitely made for the up-and-down nature of the game, upon further reflection.

Discipline, Guys, Discipline:  While the Devils PK remains untouched, the Devils did play with fire by taking five minor penalties.  I'll grant that the fifth one, a holding call on Clarkson, was unclear during play and replay.  So I don't know whether that was legit or a make-up call for a non-trip tripping call on Dennis Wideman earlier in the first period.  Still, Anton Volchenkov, an important part of the Devils' penalty killing units, got tagged twice for tripping.  Those were poor penalties to take.  Ryan Carter tagged Marcus Johansson with a high stick on offense, which was another avoidable call. Then there was Hedberg's minor penalty.  He continued to display his randomness outside of the crease and fired a puck over the glass within the first two minutes of the game.  

I don't think the Devils are an undisciplined team.  Yet, recent games have pushed them to fourteenth in the league in times shorthanded with 57.  They need to start cutting down on calls now if they want to continue their reputation as a relatively clean team.  More relevant to this game, taking these kinds of penalties are dangerous against a frightfully talented power play.  The Devils PK units played well, but they should not have to be relied on to kill about a sixth of a regulation game.  Especially after doing so last night.

Third Line Weirdness:  The third line of Mattias Tedenby, Ryan Carter, and David Clarkson didn't have such a great night. They were defending more often than they were attacking (negative in Corsi and Fenwick), and only Carter had a shot on goal among the three.   Clarkson had 6 attempts, but nothing on net; Tedenby just had a missed shot; and Carter had a shot on goal.   Yet, they contributed to tonight's game.  Carter's one shot on goal was a re-direction of a Salvador pass that surprised Michal Neuvirth enough to beat him.  That shot never would have happened if Tedenby didn't charge to the net, which got the puck over to the corner that Salvador pinched in on.  As for Clarkson, well, he scored the shootout winning goal.  Weird.

#6 Looked Like He Was Everywhere: Just a note, Dennis Wideman played 33:52 this evening and in all situations for the Caps.  Yes, it's really was possible that you kept seeing that man all over the place. 

Fourth Line Shorted:  Cam Janssen and Vladimir Zharkov played just over 2 minutes, while Brad Mills just got over 4.  It was a close game and having that fourth line out there would have been a detriment either when the Devils were down 2-0 or when it was tied.  I can understand that, but I really do hope the Devils start thinking of the near future and put together a solid fourth line.  Relying on three forward lines for a vast majority of the game works now, but should one of them have a bad night or if the energy is sapped, having a weak fourth line could come back to haunt the Devils.  Also: Zharkov needs ice time.

Sykora Off the Faceoff:  Petr Sykora has three goals this season.  All three came off the same play.  Elias wins an offensive zone faceoff from the right circle.  The puck goes behind Elias and Sykora curls over to take the puck.  He takes one look and slings it towards far post.  Against Dallas, he picked a corner.  Against Carolina, Cam Ward got a piece of it but it still went in.  Tonight, it just went past Neuvirth's glove.   At this point, I'm thinking this is some kind of set play.  If I'm right, then I look forward to it in the future.  Sykora still has a great shot and this play takes full advantage of that skill.  If only Elias was better on faceoffs, then we may even see it more often too.

Moose Redemption: I didn't like how Moose played in the first period. He cleared a puck over the glass without pressure, which was just plain stupid.  He didn't look calm early on in the game, scrambling in his crease and not getting back into stance quickly.  Most of all, he saw John Carlson's shot cleanly in the first period.   There was no screen by Jason Chimera.  There was no screen by a Devil.  There was no interference with the goalie.  The scorers thought Chimera tipped it in, and gave him the goal.  I thought Carlson's shot beat Hedberg cleanly - and so it was a soft one to allow; but if it was indeed a tip, then that changes things.  My point is that Moose wasn't all that great in the first period.

He totally redeemed himself in subsequent periods.  While the scorer was seemingly stingy in counting shots on net, what the Caps did get on it weren't easy shots for Hedberg to stop.  5 of those 6 shots in the second and third period were highlight reel saves (as in, you can see them in the highlights at NHL.com).  His stop on Wideman in overtime was crucial too.  The Moose was just as strong in the shootout as he was only beaten by an incredibly hard Ovechkin shot from the slot that picked a corner.   He moved well in denying Matt Hendricks, Backstrom, and Alexander Semin.    The only real problem I had with Hedberg outside of the first period was that he continued to be random outside of his net in playing the puck.   For better or worse, that's nothing new to Devils fans. 

Ovechkin Still is Scary:  He wasn't left wide open, but he kept skating hard into space.  Ovechkin was making plays (e.g. finding Wideman all alone in the slot in overtime), attempting to fire shots (2 on net, 8 blocked, 1 missed), and kept getting in one-on-one situations with Devils defenders.   While those Devils did well in those situations (e.g. Larsson in OT), every time he's got the puck, I'm suddenly worried.   I'm kind of glad I don't have to see #8 try and ruin New Jersey's night for another 6 weeks.

Good Result to Start a Road Trip:  While it wasn't a complete game or a great game by the Devils, they did get a win. It's something to feel good about before their next leg of the road trip: a back-to-back with Buffalo and Boston. 

Those are my thoughts on tonight's game. Now I want to know yours.  What was your impression on how the Devils played this evening?  What from tonight's game stuck out from you?  What's a bigger problem: the Devils lack of success on man advantages or handing the opposition several power plays?  Power play and/or discipline aside, what do you want the Devils to improve on for their next game based on what you seen tonight?  Please leave your answers and other thoughts on tonight's game in the comments.  Thanks to everyone who commented and read the Gamethread; thanks to everyone who followed @InLouWeTrust on Twitter during the game; and thank you for reading.

Comment 34 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

but if it was indeed a tip, then that changes things.

It caught the inside of Chimera’s outside knee, relative to Hedberg. Looked like Carlson’s shot was going wide.

Just a note, Dennis Wideman played 33:52 this evening and in all situations for the Caps.

Roman Hamrlik’s final shift was a little before Carter’s goal.

Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.

by red army line on Nov 13, 2011 12:17 AM EST reply actions  

OK – I swore it went in cleanly during the game and replays of said goal, I stand corrected. Let me ask this: Why was Hamrlik benched during the second period? Was he hurt?

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Nov 13, 2011 9:30 AM EST up reply actions  

CSN showed a pretty clear replay during 1st intermission showing it changed direction off his knee.

I assume so. But I’m sure crazier things have happened than a coach shortening his bench to 4D and a F playing D on the second night of a B2B…

Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.

by red army line on Nov 13, 2011 10:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Interesting. MSG did not show a single clear replay of the puck deflecting off Chimera’s leg.

Nice catch Red army.

by DiffuseTheBob on Nov 13, 2011 6:27 PM EST up reply actions  

At this point, I’m thinking this is some kind of set play.

It’s truly amazing all three of Sykora’s goals have come like this. These are the faceoff results coaches imagine, practice and only see executed successfully a handful of times. I had forwards memorize a variety of set faceoff plays, but you have to school them to look at the situation. They get on the ice, look how the forwards are lining up, talk, and adapt appropriately.

Or (more simply and more likely with Elias and Sykora) they just win the faceoff and shoot.

Here is the exact Elias-Sykora set play in the middle of this video.

My question is did this come from DeBoer, Oates or Elias-Sykora? And can you just imagine if Gomez would have tried to set this up with Mogilny who had an even better wrist shot than Sykora?

I have respect for most sports fans with 2 exceptions: NY Ranger fans who grew up in New Jersey, and Dallas Cowboy fans who can't name the capital of Texas.

by Cherno77 on Nov 13, 2011 12:39 AM EST reply actions  

It is truly amazing. It would be fantastic if it worked 3 times all year. Let alone 3 times in 15 games.

by NJDOhio on Nov 13, 2011 1:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Amazing ? a face-off shot ? I’ve seen a lot of these goals personally, I remember even Kovy with Atlanta in a highlight video.

"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"

by Elektrostal_Kid on Nov 13, 2011 1:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Per TG’s most recent post, this is indeed a set play.

by NJallDay on Nov 13, 2011 1:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Caps try to run it all the time from the other side of the ice for Ovechkin and Semin.

Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.

by red army line on Nov 13, 2011 10:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Sykora

I’ve been a little bit concerned that Sykora seems to make a lot of chances, but some of his shots don’t come off cleanly.

This may be confirmation bias because he’s up in years, bounced around the league/ Europe, and is back at the Devils as a gap-filler. In short, I might be seeing things that aren’t there because I assume he’s lost a step or two.

So, if these set-plays are lighting a little fire in him and making him feel good with the team again, well great!

by Alan Wright on Nov 13, 2011 4:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice review

I only have one nitpick: I think Tedenby needs more ice time, over Zharkov getting it anyway. I also think if Tedenby made the play Henrique did that led to that first goal, we wouldn’t see him for a month.

by hammer1649 on Nov 13, 2011 1:25 AM EST reply actions  

Maybe. But Tedenby hasn’t put up 6 points in the last week. He also doesn’t play Center.

by NJDOhio on Nov 13, 2011 1:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Tedenby hasn’t been very good. His play to beat two defensemen? Most players wouldn’t attempt it and those who would, very few would have the skill to actually get a scoring chance out of it. But it’s a play he’s attempting far too often.

Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines

by Triumph44 on Nov 13, 2011 2:16 AM EST up reply actions  

I disagree that Tedenby hasn’t been very good. When paired with Clarkson he has made three huge plays that all led to the Devils picking up points.

1. He stole the puck in the offensive zone with help from Fayne from a Nashville defender, turned toward the net and patiently found Clarkson with an excellent pass across that tied the game in the third period at 2. The Devils won in a shootout.

2. He outraced a San Jose defender to the puck, does a perfect spinorama, and finds Clarkson alone in front of the net for the go ahead goal with around 5 minutes to play in the third period. San Jose ties it with 30 seconds to go, but the Devils get a point while losing in a shootout.

3. Earlier tonight Tedenby attempts to deke around two defenders, gets by and nearly puts the puck past Neuvirth. The puck ends up in the corner where Tedenby and Clarkson battle along the boards. The puck is jostled back to Salvador, Tedenby breaks for the net, draws a defender, and temporarily screens Neuvirth. Salvador shoots a low shot which is deflected by Carter into the corner of net. Neuvirth seemed surprised by the deflection.

Tedenby has played sub-par defensively, but that does not mean he has not been very good. He has directly contributed to three clutch goals that led to 5 of the Devils points.

by DiffuseTheBob on Nov 13, 2011 3:56 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

We see those moments and think, “He does have skill, he should get more ice time.” Those moments stand out because they led to points. However, Tedenby doesn’t do any of that consistently. No, I don’t expect him to do something that will lead to goals on every shift; but he’s not even coming close on more of his shifts than otherwise. He’s more likely to skate into defenders and lose the puck when making a pass or dumping it in is the smarter play. For all the talk about his aggressive nature, the guy struggles to generate shots of his own on net. His sub-par defensive work is precisely why he saw so little ice time; he would have been a liability since it was a close game against an offensively strong team.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Nov 13, 2011 9:28 AM EST up reply actions  

The issues are the extremely high expectations that come with being a 1st round pick and the fact that he impressed under Lemaire last season. Fans expected Tedenby to take a major jump, especially in the production department. What many tend to forget, is that he has not even played a full season of games. He has played 73 games throughout the duration of his NHL career, and he is only 21 years of age. If he is still playing this poorly defensively, turning the puck over in the offensive zone, and being stuck on the 3rd line 200 games into his career, then it will be time to panic. But for a 21 year old, not even a full season into his NHL career, he has made several impressive plays this season that have directly correlated to the Devils gaining 5 of their 15 points. So give Tedenby some time. He has not been that bad this season.

I would be interested in Tedenby’s corsi and Fenwick numbers this season. I would also be interested to see his Corsi and Fenwick with and without Clarkson and vice-versa for Clarkson.

by DiffuseTheBob on Nov 13, 2011 6:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, I brought up what his Corsi rate was in this post prior to the Washington games. It went up to 2.81 after the Washington games, but his offensive zone start percentage would adjust it closer to zero.

Fenwick would take more time to put together.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Nov 13, 2011 7:23 PM EST up reply actions  

timeonice is up, did you know this? although it’s not allowing WOWY.

but yeah tedenby is probably a break even player against weak competition.

Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines

by Triumph44 on Nov 13, 2011 10:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m not ok with him neither, Mattias is way too passive in the defensive zone, he doesn’t anticipate the game, he just reacts to it. That’s not good.

And his several tries to beat a defense by himself are desperate attempts.

To my eye, he’s not making progress.

"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"

by Elektrostal_Kid on Nov 13, 2011 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Another thing I’ve noticed is that he’s constantly getting knocked off pucks in netfront and corner battles due to his size. There’s nothing he can do about it but he could work on better zone entry. Maybe like taking after Elias, who is excellent at delaying the play when outnumbered and making a pass, instead of dumping it and turning it over anyway. He certainly has the stickhandling skills.

by rtrstevec on Nov 13, 2011 1:47 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Having read most of the reviews that have been put up this year, I have to say more often than not the play of Tedenby’s line has been praised. I fail to see why Zharkov should get ice time while a skilled hard worker (and I have seen no evidence during games that Tedenby is not a hard worker) sits in favor of him. I stand by my opinion, that if anyone on this team deserves more ice time, it is Tedenby.

by hammer1649 on Nov 13, 2011 7:24 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t get why you’re still talking about Zharkov here ? He only got 2 damn minutes against Washington, you can’t ask his line to not play at all. 2 minutes are not enough for any line already. Pete Deboer’s constantly playing with only 9 forwards, there’s nothing wrong with Tedenby’s ice time, just some top lines players gonna be burnt, well Kovy’s played way too much in the 10 first games yet, hence injury.

Btw, nobody says Tedenby is not an hard worker…

"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"

by Elektrostal_Kid on Nov 13, 2011 9:23 PM EST up reply actions  

The last line of his comments on the 4th line says Zharkov needs more ice time. My point is, with Tedenby playing 8 minutes according to espn, I feel it is Tedenby who needs more ice time. Sorry for the confusion.

by hammer1649 on Nov 13, 2011 10:21 PM EST up reply actions  

2nd period.

I disagree with your assessment of the 2nd. The Devils may have been pinned a few times. But think they did more of the pinning.

But I agree that the first 10 minutes weren’t that poor. Their over all play wasn’t deserving being down 0-2.

I would have rather the Devils win in regulation but I will take it and if it wasn’t for the turnover they may have. But over all I felt the game was pretty even. Take the goals out and they split the 1st. Devils won the 2nd. Caps won the 3rd. It was a entertaining game.

by NJDOhio on Nov 13, 2011 1:33 AM EST reply actions  

I noticed that Ovechkin played a lot of time, especially in the third period, against Mark Fayne. Fayne did a great job keeping him from getting clean chances at the net, and he won most of the battles along the boards. I don’t remember seeing him beaten on any play, and despite getting rough rides from Ovi he did not get out of position.

When Ovechkin wasn’t playing against Fayne he was battling with Anton Volchenkov. I assume there was a lot of Russian trash talk going on as both big bodies kept banging each other around.

by Barry G on Nov 13, 2011 2:55 AM EST reply actions  

Fayne’s biggest weakness, IMO, is 1 on 1 plays on the rush – he can be beaten that way for sure. I thought he played great against all of Ovechkin’s tricks.

Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines

by Triumph44 on Nov 13, 2011 10:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Well yeah, Ovechkin drpoped the puck himself on most of the one on one rushes, Fayne couldn’t really fail on those. But I do remember in Fridays game Ovechkin absolutely destroyed Fayne with a deke.

And Kovalchuk speeds away, great moves, busting through, DID YOU SEE THAT?

by KovyisLove on Nov 13, 2011 1:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Great play by Bryce showing patience and getting his head up and finding Carter for that nice deflection. It was nice to see our guys use that play that other teams have been burning the Devs on. I said it opening nite and I’ll state it again; Its nice to have this guy back again. Obviously Mgmnt had a decision to make between Bryce and Colin White and I don’t know if Bryce’s contract could’ve been bought out in the same manner but this guy has played inspired hockey and it was nice to see him get rewarded on the scoresheet. Its no coincidence that him and A train have this PK playing great and is a big factor in team staying in these games. We only rank ahead of Isles for fewest goals scored so keeping the opposition off the scoresheet by killing penalties is mainly the difference from having a respectable record and vying to stay in top 8 to being sunk 2 bottom and having a tough road to hoe.

by 68devils on Nov 13, 2011 7:00 AM EST reply actions  

I grade the Devils PP’s C, B, D, D and E for their 5 tries this game. The first one was only a minute 5-on-4, and had some reasonable shape. The second: they gained the zone in control and got set up for a number of good chances. From there on, they went downhil, to the point where on their last one, they were back struggling to figure out even how to gain the zone, let alone set up. I don’t know … it still seems to me that they are struggling with basics.

Thank goodness the PK is firing on all cylinders. It’s a classy looking PK, quite aggressive but also keeping a good defensive box. No breakouts this time, but you have to be hapy when you can shut down the Caps PP that well.

Overall – great effort guys. Really strong fightback in the second, and some huge saves from the Moose.

p.s. Teddy – tremendous breakaway, and ended up stripping the defenceman’s stick and glove, leading to panic in their D just prior to the 2nd goal. Their d-man had to borrow a stick and play with an ungloved hand, which has to feel weird.

by AlienDev on Nov 13, 2011 12:31 PM EST reply actions  

The PP stops any momentum

It needs to be fixed soon or we’ll miss the playoffs.

The Devils have won more titles than all Philly pro sports teams combined in the last 25 years

by Real Big Devils Fan on Nov 14, 2011 5:03 PM EST reply actions  

That isn’t necessarily the case. A (more) potent PP would certainly help the team win games, but they’re still quite capable of making the playoffs if it isn’t.

In 1995, the Devils were ranked 23rd on the PP (out of 26 teams) and won the Cup.
In 2003, the Devils were ranked 30th (i.e., DEAD LAST) on the PP and won the Cup.

….

And before you make a claim that an awesome PK can overcome a wretched PP, the Devils were also ranked 16th on the PK (81.2%) during the 1995 Cup season. So that isn’t a requirement, either.

by acasser on Nov 14, 2011 9:10 PM EST up reply actions  

So, they won on even strength play primarily in those years, assuming their PP play wasn’t better in the Playoffs?

Well, I’m happy with the PK. If the PP doesn’t improve straight-away, I hope the PK stays steady. An improvement with either will take pressure off the even-strength play.

by Alan Wright on Nov 14, 2011 11:45 PM EST up reply actions  

They won on their defense more than anything else.

In 1995, the Devils were 5th in the League when it came to fewest Goals Allowed. The Devils’ offense ranked 16th, which was in the lower half of the League.

In 2003, Brodeur won a Jennings Trophy (and the Devils did have the best PK in the League). The Devils’ offense ranked 14th, which is right about the middle of the pack.

….

Right now, the Devils’ PK is a large part of what is keeping them afloat — they’re 2nd overall in the NHL at 93.0%, and I believe Cangialosi and Resch keep telling us how they haven’t allowed a power play goal at home. If other facets of the Devils’ play doesn’t pick up, we’ll need it to remain that good…. especially if there continues to be a conga line to the penalty box as we’ve seen in recent games.

by acasser on Nov 15, 2011 10:54 AM EST up reply actions  

Oh, they definitely one on their defense. I’m from NJ and I’ve always been a Devils fan even from what I can remember in the 80s, but that’s a big part of the identity of the Devils that I love so much. It’s like being a “gridiron” football fan. Defensive toughness, ground-and-pound, like the Steelers or Giants.

Yes, the PK is def going strong as you’ve said. I think they’re 20 for the last 20 on top of being untouched at home.

Conga line… sad, but true. Those boyos need some more discipline. 2 minutes in the sin bin obviously isn’t punishment enough. DeBoer needs to bring a smack down for some of that sloppiness because relying on the strength of the PK will tire them out.

At least, though, the conga line isn’t the violent kind of penalties like the Pens had last year.

by Alan Wright on Nov 15, 2011 5:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the New Jersey Devils! New here? Check out the Rules and Guidelines before posting.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

The_official_web_site___new_jersey_devils_small
FOR THE LOVE OF THE DEVILS...PLEASE DON'T SELL YOUR TICKETS TO RANGERS FANS

Recent FanPosts

Small
Games Played in the Conference Playoffs: A History Lesson
Small
Line Changes...Again
Small
Cup or Bust?
31519_397927484582_78722009582_3938348_414926_n_small
Question for you NJ natives.
Claude_small
Post your press conference question(s) for John Tortorella here.
Pig_face_small
Mar-ty, Hen-ke
Small
Top Secret Agent or Cranky Middle Aged Man?
Small
Karma, and Pucks, and Chips Oh My,
Small
No Blue Campaign -- Tickets for Sale
Small
On Shot Blocking

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

joomla visitors

Managers

Stanley_cup_and_you_-_sbn_small John Fischer

Authors

Puddy_small Tom Stivali

Marty_sbetter_small Matthew Ventolo

Zidlickymania_small Kevin Sellathamby

1729_small Matt Evans SNC