Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: How The Kings Beat The Coyotes: Lather, Rinse, Repeat

New Jersey Devils Offensive Outbursts Overtook Buffalo Sabres 5-3

One of the big reasons why last season's New Jersey Devils team struggled was that their shooting percentages were in the tank. By the end of the season, they were collectively still dead last in shooting percentage - one of the lowest in recent memory. This season, the Devils haven't been as unfortunate in terms of percentages; but scoring goals has come at a premium. Going into tonight's game, they were still among the worst five teams in the league in goals scored per game. Their power play has been horrific, though Matt Ventolo had more to say about that earlier today. Over at Behind the Net, the Devils were still shooting at a mere 7.5% in 5-on-5 situations.  Only two of their wins have been by more than one goal.   Offense would be an issue.

Tonight, the offense got the benefit of the percentages on the Buffalo Sabres and Jhonas Enroth.   The Devils only put 21 shots on net, but they scored five goals.  They scored a shorthanded goal and a 5-on-4 power play goal.  They took a lead on the Sabres in the first period and didn't reliquish it.  In fact, they scored a third in the second period to extend the lead; and a fourth near the beginning of the third period to make it 4-1.  The Sabres answered only two of the goals, but the Devils tacked a fifth one off a breakaway.    The last one was enough to cause head coach Lindy Ruff to pull Enroth and put in Drew MacIntyre with about 10 minutes left in the game.  I am not kidding you, the Devils chased a healthy goalie out of the game.

Despite the Sabres doing their best Boston Bruins impersonation late in the game with their rushes up ice and constant crashing of the net, the Devils' offense put the game out of reach for a change - a very welcome surprise given how this season has gone.  The Devils had glorious chances to score - and they did.  It should be appreciated by all the Devils fans in the world.   Who knows whether the Devils will be able to repeat this kind of production anytime soon?  Who knows whether we'll see a 5-on-4 power play converted in the near future?  Who knows whether the Devils will get a breakaway opportunity to respond to a Buffalo goal?  Nevertheless, I'm just glad it happened and drove the Devils to victory this evening.

As usual, I have a few more thoughts on tonight's game after the jump.  For a Sabres-based take on tonight's game, please check out Die by the Blade.

Star-divide

The Stats:  The NHL.com Game Summary | The NHL.com Event Summary | The NHL.com Shot Summary | The NHL.com Play by Play Log | The Time on Ice Shift Charts | The Time on Ice Head to Head Ice Time Charts | The Time on Ice Corsi Charts

The Highlights:  From NHL.com, here are tonight's highlights which are filled with five glorious goals by the Devils.

Five Goals on 21 Shots: EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.

More Seriously, About the Offense:  After playing an intense game against Boston last night, I was worried that the Devils were going to be fatigued.  Well, Buffalo's puck movement in the neutral zone left a lot to be desired and the Devils were fresh enough to pick them up most of the time.   Later on in the game, the Sabres shaped up in that department, but the Devils managed to win plenty of pucks from Buffalo in all three zones.  When they had space and/or numbers, the Devils did well to make the most of it.  Take Patrik Elias' goal tonight for example.  The shot that became the goal was the direct result of Petr Sykora (yeah, him) winning a puck along the boards and finding a big gaping hole in the Sabres' coverage to find Elias.  The Devils won that battle and it quickly turned into a rocket for a score.

Interestingly, their best offensive opportunities started off with some defense.  A stop on the PK led to Zach Parise setting up Adam Henrique in the neutral zone. Henrique flew in, somehow managed enough control to slide it to the slot with two Sabres skaters crashing on him, and Parise pounded the puck in.  Prior to Mark Fayne's goal, a stop in the Devils' end yielded a 2-on-1 for Ilya Kovalchuk and Henrique.  Kovalchuk looked for the pass the whole way, still managed to get a shot off of it; and Henrique jammed at it to force a freeze from Enroth.  Henrique won the subsequent faceoff and Fayne teed it up and put it high past Enroth.   Goal #5 started off with the Sabres overloading the slot. A Sabre (I forget who) broke his stick on an attempt on a rebound.  Andy Greene took it and flung it up ice into the neutral zone. Clarkson was right there to take it, he had nothing but acres of space, and he drove in and beat Enroth on a breakaway.   You may not see it in the highlight video, but three defensive stops led to plays that led to three of the Devils' 5 goals.

Normally, I wouldn't be pleased with just 21 shots on net.  But when 5 goals are scored from it, I'm not going to complain too much.   Likewise, I wouldn't complain about Buffalo putting up 32 shots on net.

The Rattling Sabres:  The Sabres gave up two goals in the first period and didn't really respond until there was about 5:30 left in the first period.  Then the Sabres got some shots on net - only 2 prior - and they figured on trying to beat the Devils in their own end with speed.  It definitely created some good chances for them and they built on that as they game went on.  Of course, the Devils kept scoring goals as the game went on - boy, does it feel good to type that - so the score compelled Buffalo to get more aggressive. The game opened up and the Sabres started to resemble the Bruins from last night's at times on offense.  Lots of stretch passes, lots of crashing the net, and loads of pace. 

As such, the shot count leaned heavily in Buffalo's favor, as they out-shot the Devils 12-7 in the second and 13-7 in the third.   Also, some of these shifts absolutely pinned the Devils back and that's when the fatigue really sets in and the attacking team is at their most dangerous.  Late in the first period, the Henrique line got stuck in their own end and Adam Larsson was so gassed, he struggled to skate.  That was the most notable case since one out of five Devils skaters was just beat; but there were other shifts where it was clear that Buffalo was in control.    Fortunately, it wasn't necessarily those instances that got the Sabres their 3 goals - thanks to a certain legend.

Again, it shouldn't be a surprise the Sabres looked and played so strong on offense from the second period onward since the Sabres were losing for most of the game. They had to be more aggressive on offense to try and claw their way back into it.  It didn't happen, thankfully; and so I wouldn't write off the Devils defense just yet.

A Legend Was Mostly Solid:  It's so nice to have a goaltender who you don't have to worry about when he leaves the crease to play the puck.  Martin Brodeur got the start and I felt he did mostly good.  He wasn't bothered by the lack of action early on.  He didn't succumb to the Sabres crashing the net looking for a "garbage" goal.  He played the puck with calmness and purpose.   Of course, he was called upon to bail out his team when Sabres were found wide open in front a few times.  Most memorably, he slid from the right post to the left side to absolute robbed Jason Pominville with a glove save.

However, it was not all perfect for Brodeur.  Tyler Myers' first goal wasn't his fault, the puck bounced to an open Myers on his flank during a Sabres power play.  Someone had to be open and it was him.  While he got a piece of Jordan Leopold's shot that led to the third goal for Buffalo, the shot did find it's way through several bodies before it got to Brodeur.  Myers' second goal, however, was a bit of a soft one.  Nathan Gerbe played Myers out wide, the big defender cut inside, and rocketed a shot past an awkward-looking Brodeur.  I don't know whether he was surprised by the shot or just didn't get to the post cleanly, but Brodeur's stance could have been much better.   That said, I felt Brodeur was quite fine in net and his bailout saves more than make up for Myers' second tally in my eyes. 

Head Shots Are Illegal, Right?: While Myers will get a lot of credit for scoring two goals and only looking foolish in trying to stop Henrique prior to Parise's goal, Myers left his feet and hit Dainius Zubrus in the head.  Zubrus and Myers aren't small guys, but the hit took down Zubrus right away.  Thankfully, Zubrus went to the bench and went on to play the rest of the game. However, there was no penalty on Myers. What's more is that those unfortunate to have listened to Mike Milbury and Randy Jones during the second intermission report on Versus, as both claimed it was clean check.  Yes, a head shot.   I do not care whether he targeted the head or not, aren't head shots illegal now?  Why wasn't there a penalty? 

Myers got away with something dangerous in the game, hopefully the league is smarter than that and will enforce the rules on him later on.  That said, I'm not getting my hopes up.

The Return of Ilya Kovalchuk:  This was a weird game to watch #17.  He played his first game after being out the last five with a groin pull.    I expected some rust, but it didn't seem to me that Kovalchuk ever went into top speed.  He didn't fly up and down the ice as we're used to seeing.  He had chances to shoot in a couple of odd-man rushes and not only chose to pass, but his body language clearly said he was only going to pass.  As strange as this sounds, I wanted Kovalchuk to be a bit more selfish with the puck - yet he wasn't.

Yet, this didn't seem to hinder him much in the run of play.  Kovalchuk was a part of a few odd-man rushes and no one caught up to him.  Kovalchuk still played 22:33 and didn't look too out of place.  Kovalchuk managed to lead the team in shot attempts with 6: 3 on net, 1 blocked, 2 missed.  Kovalchuk threw a big hit on Myers not long after Myers got away with a dirty hit on Zubrus.   Oh, and Kovalchuk undressed Derek Roy and picked a corner past Mike Weber and Enroth during the Devils' second power play of the evening.   Yep, Kovalchuk scored a goal in his first game back and it was on the power play.    Therefore, I can't complain too loudly about his return. He looked a little rusty, but he wasn't a detriment to the team this evening.  I do think he'll be fine going forward in future games.

Another Reason Why Kovalchuk May Have Looked Slow:  One reason that Kovalchuk, Zach Parise, and Adam Henrique looked to struggle at times was their most match up this evening. Sabres head coach Lindy Ruff definitely made the most of his last change and targeted the Henrique line with their top line of Roy, Pominville, and Thomas Vanek.  While they didn't score, they definitely tried their best as Roy had 4 shots on net, Pominville had 5, and Vanek chipped in 1.  The Henrique were behind in Corsi even right from the start; and they finished the worst among Devils skaters: Parise, -7; Kovalchuk, -8; and Henrique, -10.  It definitely matches up with how they struggled with their pressure at times.  While they broke off a few odd-man rushes, the Roy unit dictated play for the most part.  To a degree, that's understandable since A) the Sabres were losing throughout the game and B) that line's not exactly a defensive group.   Still, forwards always look slow when they're force to play back for a good chunk of their shift first.

I would also like to add that this is the tactical problem the Devils will have to learn to deal with.  Peter DeBoer has used the Elias line to go up against the other team's top line. On the road, without that last change, opponents have keyed on the Henrique unit.  DeBoer tried to help them out by sticking Henrik Tallinder and Mark Fayne behind them, the usual pairing that takes on the toughs.  Yet, they couldn't quell the Sabres too much; just clean up whatever they could.   Truthfully, I'm not sure if this is so much a coaching issue as it is a player issue.  Since DeBoer doesn't have as much control with match-ups on the road, the players outside of the Elias line have to be prepared to the other team's top players.  If that means further work on defense, then so be it.

More than Seven Minutes of Janssen: If you want the best example of the Devils feeling confident in the third period, then know this: the fourth line got multiple shifts in the third period.  That's right, Cam Janssen played multiple shifts in the third period.  He nearly had a chance to score, too.   With just over 7:30 of ice time, the fourth line featured the most when the Devils had a 3-goal lead.   I'm fine with that because DeBoer hasn't used his fourth line much at all in most games this season.  With the Devils having played the night before, spelling the other forwards a little more was understandable. 

That said, their night was cut short when they failed to get control and get a clearance prior to Leopold scoring.   Instead of pushing forward, they were knocked back by the Brad Boyes line and the Sabres got a lifeline in the game.  Alas, the likes of Brad Mills (4 missed shots, really?), Vladimir Zharkov, and Cam Janssen can take solace in being the only Devils to finish the game positive in Corsi.

Reminder that Adam Larsson is a Rookie:  The first period was definitely a struggle for Larsson.   He had a few giveaways, a few soft plays on the puck, and thanks to the Devils recovering in their own end, he was very lucky the Sabres didn't make the Devils pay the price for his errors.   Larsson, I think, looked a little better as the game went on and he didn't need to be protected like he was last night.  Perhaps the back-to-back affected him early on?  Even if he didn't, it's clear to me that's what you get with a rookie defender. On some nights, he has early troubles and rises above; and on others, he didn't.

Penalty Killing Perfection Thwarted: The Sabres have done something to the Devils that hasn't been done since the Devils played in Phoenix:  scored a power play goal.  The play itself was a good bounce finding Myers wide open at the net on Brodeur's (and the Devils skaters') flank.  But that play doesn't happen if Ryan Carter wasn't so foolish.  Late in the first period, as the Sabres were starting to get back into the game, Carter hit Andrej Sekera into Enroth and the net.  That was a clear interference penalty.  After the Devils kill that penalty, he gets caught hooking Matt Ellis in the neutral zone.   Two straight PK situations, and Buffalo scored on the second one.  Thanks, Carter. 

By the way, he very neatly got a third penalty tonight when he came close to boarding Patrick Kaleta during the second period.   Carter's been pretty good as a third line, energy center; but he needs to temper his physical play. 

Fortunately, the Devils PK got back on track in the third period after Clarkson got caught high-sticking Paul Gaustad.  They didn't let the Sabres get a good shot off and they cleared the puck as if they were still on their streak. I think they'll be fine going forward.  As a whole, the PK allowed 6 shots on net over 6:04 across 4 opportunities. That's not too bad, considering the Sabres needed the PP to get something on the board (and they did).

Power Play...Woes Again?:  Yes, yes, yes, Kovalchuk scored a magnificent goal on a power play.  The Devils went 1-for-4, which is a far better percentage than what they usually do in a game.  Yet, I can't say the power play had a good night.  The Devils had 6:12 of power play time (Aside: some of Buffalo's penalties were just lazy - Vanek's chopping down of Tallinder during a forecheck, Roy's hook on Brad Mills.) and mustered only 3 shots on net. That's not good at all.  After Kovalchuk's goal, one would think the plan should involve #17 getting the puck.  Alas, it was not.  I will say the Devils tried to use him on a backdoor play, but Parise botched the pass.  I mention it because it's different from what they've been doing. Basically, while the Devils converted one, they still have a lot more work to do.

Let's Talk About a Healthy Scratch:  Since Kovalchuk returned, someone had to sit and that someone was Mattias Tedenby.  While he played very well at Boston, he was a victim of the numbers game - and the guy who took his spot did score 2 goals the night before.  It's a fair question to ask whether he'll be back sooner rather than later. Nick Palmieri only played 11:21 and got 1 shot on goal.  He did finish a -2 in Corsi, which isn't bad on a team that finished -10 (again, Buffalo needed to attack and they did).  Yet, I wasn't real impressed with #12 after a game where he scored two goals.   Maybe this will open up the possibility of starting Mattias Tedenby.  When he does get one, he's got to take it.

Why Didn't Dainius Zubrus Take Some of Patrik Elias' Faceoffs?: Tonight, Elias was miserable at the dot.  He went 3-for-17.  Carter wasn't much better at 4-for-13; but Elias was positively stinky.  Why didn't Zubrus take some of his draws? Zubrus was perfect by going 4-on-4 when Elias was tossed out of the zone.  We know he's played center before, and taking the draw doesn't mean he can't shift back to the wing immediately.   It's a small point to make, but I wanted to point it out anyway. 

By the by, the rest of the Devils' faceoff takers were well above 50%.  Elias and Carter dragged the team down to 46% of all draws won.

Congratulations:  Zubrus played in his 1,000th game this evening.  Congratulations. After the game, he said it was OK, as reported here by Tom Gulitti.

Those are my thoughts on tonight's game. Now I want to know yours.  What did you think of the Devils performance overall?  Wasn't it great to see the Devils score 5 in a game?  How did the Devils look to you on the second half of this back-to-back?  What would you like the Devils to improve upon for Saturday's game? What impressed you about Buffalo's game, if anything? Please leave your answers and other thoughts about tonight's game in the comments. Thanks to everyone who read and commented on the game in the Gamethread; thanks to all who followed @InLouWeTrust during the game; and thank you for reading.

Comment 63 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Brodeur played very well, even though three goals against doesn’t look great. The bottom line is that the Devils led pretty much the entire game, most of it by multiple goals, so naturally, Buffalo played catch-up all night and should have outshot the Devils. The Devils did tonight what they couldn’t do in Boston: cash in on early opportunities. It was a good effort.

DownGoesAvery. Check out the hockey blog that's shaking the world: Down Goes Avery and on Twitter (@DownGoesAvery ).
Down Goes Avery on Facebook

by DownGoesAvery on Nov 16, 2011 11:54 PM EST reply actions  

I’d like to see Larsson taking a few games off. Moreover Taormina is doing pretty well in the minors he deserves a shot.

"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"

by Elektrostal_Kid on Nov 17, 2011 12:00 AM EST reply actions  

Agreed. Can’t say enough how much I like Larsson and respect him for taking such a low salary. But…

I think if anyone needs some rest and relaxation, it’s him. It’s not that he played awful tonight, it’s that he’s continuing to make the same types of mistakes every single game. Sloppy passing, lazy skating. Can you ever remember a time where Larsson skated full speed down the ice as a Devil? He’s looked out of shape since he got here. People have attributed it to being “calm” and “poised” but the fact is he’s just been slow on many occasions.

by NJallDay on Nov 17, 2011 12:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, me too. Maybe not down to Albany, but at least one night off to rest up. He’s taking some big hits night in and night out.

Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines

by Triumph44 on Nov 17, 2011 12:28 AM EST up reply actions  

This. Absolutely. Larsson’s trying to do too much. He just needs to keep his composure. Having Stevens and Robinson as coaches should help his cause…

DownGoesAvery. Check out the hockey blog that's shaking the world: Down Goes Avery and on Twitter (@DownGoesAvery ).
Down Goes Avery on Facebook

by DownGoesAvery on Nov 17, 2011 1:24 AM EST up reply actions  

He is the 2nd highest in TOI on the Devils. He doesn’t need nights off, he needs to play less during the game.

During the Carolina game he looked great. He skated quickly, made shrewd decisions with the puck, and played well defensively. Since then he has made at least one critical mistake a game. He recently turned 19 years old, and this is part of the learning process. Most 19 year old players are learning in the AHL, at college, or overseas. Scratching him is not going to eliminate his mistakes, only experience will.

The only time he looked slow vs Buffalo was when he got stuck on the ice for a couple of minutes and the Devils failed to clear the zone several times.

Larsson has not been taking big hits night in and night out. He took one from Rinaldo that was a clear charging penalty, and Rinaldo was penalized for it. I do not know why that was an example tonight on VS of Larsson not keeping his head up, because it a was a charge he had no way of avoiding. The Ovechkin hit was a check by an elite player that rarely occurs. Other than that I cannot recall him being manhandled by anyone else, and definitely not night in and night out.

by DiffuseTheBob on Nov 17, 2011 1:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Most 19 year old players are learning in the AHL, at college, or overseas. Scratching him is not going to eliminate his mistakes, only experience will

.You’re reading too much into my comment, Larsson does not have to be scratched benched or punished. he just needs a few games off to take some rest because of physical reasons.
yes, he’s a young kid playing his 1st season at a NHL pace/level, he will need some time for a complete adaptation, about the game but physically too.
And in the case you think the lad should be expected to play the whole 82 games, I’d call that insane, no offense intended though.

"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"

by Elektrostal_Kid on Nov 17, 2011 2:06 AM EST up reply actions  

I was basically replaying to everyone at once, but only clicked you because it generally included everyone. That comment you quoted above was not directly in response to what you said, but generally all comments.

However, if he needs a few nights off because of physical reasons, than wouldn’t you agree the Devils should be playing him less each game? If he truly was tired or needed nights off, I doubt the Devils would continue to utilize him the way they have.
 
Gomez fell into a similar situation as Larsson and he played 82 games. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Larsson play upwards of 78 games barring an injury. The only way I see him being scratched is due to an injury, not physical exhaustion.

by DiffuseTheBob on Nov 17, 2011 2:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Well, to give him some rest is just my opinion, playing him less minutes would be another one, still d-men don’t work alone but by pair, no double-shifting possible I mean, and Larsson gets heavy minutes via PP duties already. That wouldn’t be easy to cut his time on ice.

 All I am saying : A 19 years defenseman shouldn’t play that much so early in the season, even with a few nights off, he still gonna learn.

"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"

by Elektrostal_Kid on Nov 17, 2011 3:09 AM EST up reply actions  

@Diffuse: Gotta take issue with your statement that

The only time he looked slow vs Buffalo was when he got stuck on the ice for a couple of minutes

You’re definitely right that there were a few very extended shifts where Buffalo was pressuring us and Larsson got stuck on the ice, but I feel it extends beyond this. I’ve been posting about how Larsson looks slow to me for awhile. I’ve never really seen him “hustle”. He’s been caught flat footed and been beat because of it numerous times already. And he’s tried to force passes while flat footed which have been intercepted and capitalized on by the opposition. I really feel he needs a lot more conditioning. D is not as tiring of a position as a forward, and you saw for yourself how dead Larsson was last night when every other Devil on the ice for that shift wasn’t doing nearly as bad. I’m not saying send him to Albany. Just let him rest every 2nd or 3rd game for awhile and demand a stricter conditioning regimen.

by NJallDay on Nov 17, 2011 10:42 AM EST up reply actions  

That entire line looked dead for that shift. I do agree that he looks a little tired, but you’re definitely exaggerating how “poorly” he’s played.

by undersuspicion426 on Nov 17, 2011 5:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t feel I’m exaggerating. I’ve got no reason to, like I said, I love Larsson. But he still comes across as one of the most nonchalant members of our team night in and night out. I’d like to see him move his feet a lot more.

Cutting to the chase: I think he is way too slow, and way too out of shape for someone his age. Hope he proves me wrong of course. I want him to be better than Niedermayer.

by NJallDay on Nov 17, 2011 6:32 PM EST up reply actions  

he plays 22 minutes a night. he is clearly not out of shape.

Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines

by Triumph44 on Nov 17, 2011 8:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Haha that’s true. I still feel like he’s looked slow and flat footed more than anyone else on the team, and could really benefit from some time off. Again and as always, just my opinion!

by NJallDay on Nov 18, 2011 10:09 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

He’s being targeted by teams – he took a number of hits in the Boston game and took at least one tonight. It’s not anything profoundly different from what players in the NHL take, but I’m sure it’s much more punishing than what players in the Swedish Elite League take.

Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines

by Triumph44 on Nov 17, 2011 11:36 AM EST up reply actions  

Kovalchuk needs to shoot more. His lack of selfishness is becoming apparent, and when you have one of the most dangerous shots in the league, being selfish is a good thing.

He continues to find himself in goal scoring positions, only to dish the puck off. I would have rather seen him fake the pass to Henrique and a take a shot on goal tonight on the 2 on 1. He had another opportunity with Parise, only to miss him with the pass.

Just shoot the damn puck.

by DiffuseTheBob on Nov 17, 2011 1:58 AM EST reply actions  

Perhaps he’s unconsciously overcompensating for the high salary he’s getting by trying to be a real team player? I would understand if such a process was at work last season.

Alternatively, he might be seeing that both the D and the goalie are cheating to his side on 2-on-1 situations and he’s playing the percentage in his head that his teammate has more net to fire at. It wouldn’t surprise me if D and G me did overcompensate because they know what a danger her is.

That said, if he’s not threading the needle on his saucer passes then he should look to shoot nearside low or five hole to produce a rebound at the top of the crease.

by Alan Wright on Nov 17, 2011 5:28 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I agree he should have shot on the Henrique play, or at least drove the net harder before dishing it off, but I don’t think this is as much of a problem as a lot of fans think. On the PP, he made a “selfish” move and used the screen for a pretty goal, so it’s not like he’s only thinking pass. I would need to see the Parise opportunity again as it’s not on the highlight reel, but I remember thinking that was a great play and Zach just missed the puck (it happens). If Zach gets that, he’s on his forehand pretty close to the center slot area with plenty of time and space for a shot or a quick pass-back. Kovy was pretty far right on that play, and since he’s a righty he didn’t have much of an angle. If he’s gonna shoot there he should go low far side so it bounces out to Zach, but I like the pass better personally because of all the options it creates.

He’s a stud sniper so his passing skills get overlooked, but he’s pretty good…if anything his crisp passes are occasionally too hard for his teammates (other than Patty and Zach). I loved last season when he was in beast mode and scoring left and right, but if he picks his spots for passes, we’ll be that much better.

by David Vaimberg on Nov 17, 2011 10:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Kovalchuk was going at half speed last night. I think if he gets those opportunities when he is fully healthy, we may see a different result.

Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines

by Triumph44 on Nov 17, 2011 11:35 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree with Diffuse, Kovi is the best pure scoring dangler in the league, he needs to stay in beast mode like he was in the second half of the season last year. Although playing on Parise’s line kind of takes away his ability to just take over the ice. Ryan Braun Doesn’t steal third with Prince Fielder at the plate.

by Kovalklutch on Nov 17, 2011 2:19 AM EST reply actions  

Listening to this game on the radio, in the dark and by candlelight was relaxing at first. Like a bubble bath. Like a massage. Like smooth jazz. They’re all relaxing until your anxiety starts picking away at you: what the hell am I missing? Who takes a bubble bath, anyway? This massage is starting to hurt. And I don’t like Kenny G, dammit.

That was my experience listening to this game on the radio. Relaxation and frustration.

I bet DeBoer would agree, but I bet he likes smooth jazz.

by Alan Wright on Nov 17, 2011 5:17 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

That was you in my bathtub? It’s a good thing the Devs won, or this would be awkward…

by SatanicStickholders on Nov 17, 2011 10:10 AM EST up reply actions  

Sorry, but that wasn’t me. I was at home, begging the power company to fix things before the third period.

Maybe it was the Boogeyman or the lost and perhaps mythical John Maclean.

by Alan Wright on Nov 17, 2011 4:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Hen-rique and other younguns

Creating chances and crashing the net, still.

He’s another young dude I’m starting to like on this team. The others having been: Bergfors, Palmieri, Tedenby, Josefson, and Larsson.

Hell, I’ll throw in Brodeur fanboy Keith Kincaid as a good omen, though I think his alliterative name produces a rather ominous chant. Keith Kin-caid. K-K-K. Repeat. It would be funny if it weren’t just so wrong.

by Alan Wright on Nov 17, 2011 5:48 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

Edit: my iphone autocorrected for some reason. It’s actually Keith Kinkaid, which makes the chant work. Still wrong, though.

by Alan Wright on Nov 18, 2011 10:15 AM EST up reply actions  

I loved this game. We played with real energy on the forecheck and it made for a great showcase for Versus. Sure we were loose at the back, but I felt that we had this in the bag for much of the 60 minutes. (That’s a novel feeling for a Devs fan this year!)

by AlienDev on Nov 17, 2011 6:48 AM EST reply actions  

What was up with the 4th line being out there late in the third period at the end of a PP? Did DeBoer think there was going to be a fight or something?

Teams almost always follow up a PK with their top line and, lo and behold, the Sabres top line scored going up against the Janssen line. That was just a poor coaching decision.

by elesias on Nov 17, 2011 9:26 AM EST reply actions  

1: The Devils were ahead by 3

2: The Devils have been way overplaying their top line

3: The 4th line had actually had a pretty good game up to that point

I don’t mind putting them out there in that spot.

Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines

by Triumph44 on Nov 17, 2011 11:34 AM EST up reply actions  

They had been, but DeBoer had to know they were going to be facing Buffalo’s top line late in the game with them really pushing.

He didn’t have to go to the top line, he could have gone with the third line or some combination of more defensive players. No harm in the end, but that’s not something I particularly want to see happen with any regularity no matter how well they played that game.

by elesias on Nov 17, 2011 11:51 AM EST up reply actions  

right now, the devils have 3 forwards who’ve played more than 20 minutes a game. obviously kovalchuk is going to be up there when everyone’s healthy, but they are really leaning on their top guys in a way that devils teams typically don’t.

Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines

by Triumph44 on Nov 17, 2011 12:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I think Pete’s learned his lesson from John MacLean, he’s doing everything possible to avoid the team a slow start. When Zajac will return, I really hope Pete Deboer will rely more on his 4th line, I don’t even speak about a healthy Josefson but with Zajac, Elias and Henrique already, he could center the 4th line when he’s back.

 Something like Josefson centering Carter and Zharkov/Tedenby/Kovy/Parise would look pretty decent for a 4th line.

"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"

by Elektrostal_Kid on Nov 17, 2011 12:29 PM EST up reply actions  

The center position is important for any team – but I think with DeBoer’s system – it’s even more important with the way they forecheck and pressure the puck – it’s the center’s job to disrupt any play in the neutral zone if/when the opposing team does get it out of their zone.

I think you’re absolutely right in that once Zajac comes back – we will see more of the 4th line. Carter most likely goes down once Zajac gets into his groove and with Zajac, Elias, Henrique center the top 9. This gives the 4th line some more defensive “comfort” as Zharkov, Palmieri or Tedenby, one of the bashers down there. Your top 9 is Kovy, Parise, Zajac, Sykora, Elias, Zubrus, Clarkson, Palmieri/Tedenby, Henrique.

I really like this team – but with Zajac back – my goodness will we be deep.

In Lou We Trust: SBN Blog of the New Jersey Devils

by Matthew Ventolo on Nov 17, 2011 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Lines

I would have to go with

Parise-Elias-Sykora
Kovalchuk-Zajac-Zubrus
Teddy-Henrique-Clarkson
Zharkov-Carter-Palms

with Mills and Boulton/Janssen scratched

by NJDevils30 on Nov 17, 2011 2:56 PM EST up reply actions  

I like that except Id Keep the Elias- Zubrus- Sykora line together on the 2nd, then go with Parise Zajac Kovalchuck on the 1st.

"Its the letter D"

by Rory B. Bellows on Nov 17, 2011 3:05 PM EST up reply actions  

One more for keeping -Zubrus-Elias-Sykora line together, perhaps one of the best line in the league right now. I mean they’ve almost dominated every line they’ve faced so far… And we didn’t have a weak schedule just saying.

Otherwise I’d give a shot to Zajac centering Parise and Kovy withHenriquaaay .
Zajac with Parise is a perfect fit to me, nothing more or less.

That means Kovy would be a 3rd liner but I wouldn’t mind it, he still gets ice time with ful time on PP, 4th line LW’s spot is waiting for him anytime he wants, his line would see a weaker opposition which is good for Henrique too and finally depth wins games.

But I don’t know if it’s “politically correct” to put your biggest salary on the 3rd line.

"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"

by Elektrostal_Kid on Nov 17, 2011 3:24 PM EST up reply actions  

As long as he gets the ice time it doesn’t matter, and that may very well give the team 3 first lines DeBoer can roll pretty evenly.

For the sake of avoiding public backlash they can just call the Elias line the third line.

by elesias on Nov 17, 2011 3:33 PM EST up reply actions  

good news everybody, we're in the playoffs

If they happened today, that is. Crazy times we live in, people. Let’s hope that I haven’t just jinxed it.

by KenKen on Nov 17, 2011 10:35 AM EST reply actions  

Getting a little ahead of ourselves here, but it is nice that they’re hanging around. With the relatively tough schedule they’ve had so far it’s really all you can ask for.

As a side note, a quick and dirty stat to watch is their goal differential. With few exceptions the teams that make the playoffs have positive GDs and right now the Devils are sitting at -3.

Hopefully the return of Kovalchuk, the recent increase in scoring output will continue and getting to play some softer teams will all help toward righting that ship.

by elesias on Nov 17, 2011 10:48 AM EST up reply actions  

This.

I would love to see the Devils get to a positive GD.

What you fail to understand in your joyless myopia is that baseball is the key to life-- the Rosetta Stone, if you will. If you just understood baseball better all your other questions your, your... the, uh... the aliens, the conspiracies they would all, in their way be answered by the baseball gods.

by winchester5 on Nov 17, 2011 10:51 AM EST up reply actions  

We’re truly sitting at a -6 GD. We’ve scored 41 goals and allowed 47 during playing time. Getting 3 more gimmick wins than losses makes the goal differential look better (45/48) than it really is.

by Marty 4 Prez on Nov 17, 2011 11:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Indeed, though all teams benefit from that particular nuance so there’s no reason to split too many hairs about it. Point remains, however.

by elesias on Nov 17, 2011 11:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Defense, Defense, Defense

I don’t know about you guys, but I can’t stand those stupid mistakes our Ds have been making in every single game. Have you noticed how they execute a group attack on single forward leaving others wide open? Cmon! using two, and sometimes three guys to take a puck from single guy? This is just stupid, and reckless play. Most goals against were allowed this way this season..

by chopperpl on Nov 17, 2011 11:56 AM EST reply actions  

Myers should be suspended for that hit on Zubrus. It was a clear headshot before Zubes ever touched the puck. The whole buffalo team received a warning earlier in the week that their “open season” would not be tolerated. If hes not suspended I think Janssen should get a shift while Myers is out there.

"Its the letter D"

by Rory B. Bellows on Nov 17, 2011 12:17 PM EST reply actions  

Despite the 1.5 bad penalties, I liked Carter’s grittiness last night. Its an element to his game he hadn’t shown much before. And he was solid on face-offs last night. I was borderline on him before but now that he’s shown he can get his nose dirty in front of the net, he is starting to win me over.

by rtrstevec on Nov 17, 2011 1:03 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Buffalo thread

was pretty funny. They obviously didn’t want to give Marty much credit at all during the game saying “he has been so lucky with his glove tonight”…which is strange since that is probably one if not his best attribute.

But then he made that ridiculous sprawling glove save and people gave him tons of props except for one dude who said “God, Brodeurs getting so lucky again”. That save was vintage Marty and made me want to stop doubting him even though things haven’t seemed to be looking up for him in the last calendar year .

by SantonioBurress on Nov 17, 2011 1:11 PM EST reply actions  

I feel like our weakness is defence…. our aggressiveness is good buyt our shutting down skills aren’t very good.

And Kovalchuk speeds away, great moves, busting through, DID YOU SEE THAT?

by KovyisLove on Nov 17, 2011 2:10 PM EST reply actions  

The PK rankings disagree.

I get your meaning though. They’re definitely not a dominant defense, but they’re blue collar and tend to get the job done. Could be better, could be worse.

Perhaps the aggressive offense is helping to compensate for the defensive deficiencies, just as in the past it was the exact opposite.

by elesias on Nov 17, 2011 3:17 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s a good take of the defense. The aggressive fore-check has caused plenty of turnovers, and the Devils have been able to get extended pressure in the offensive zone leading to more time on attack.

Interestingly enough the Devils are 6-2 when they outshoot their opponent, and 2-5-1 when they get outshot. When shots are even they are 1-0-0.

by DiffuseTheBob on Nov 18, 2011 12:10 AM EST up reply actions  

Kovalchuk

We have now seen him score twice on the same play from the point granted in Nashville he sniped from further out, last night he crashed a little lower but it was the same set up. His other goal came from a rebound because he crashed the net late. What people have been saying would be good for him i think hes actually doing now. He seems to be coming late in the play looking for passes and rebounds instead of just rushing up with the puck every time and he’s controlling the puck in the offensive zone better especially on power plays. Now that he’s recovered from his injury and gets his legs back i think he can return to being a 40+ goal scorer on this team. Last night i would have loved to see him just rip one on the 2 v 1 with Henrique but he thought he had the best chance to make a play by passing and I’m ok with that. I think we will see him explode over the next few games.

by NJDevils30 on Nov 17, 2011 2:48 PM EST reply actions  

Yeah, there’s no comparison between Kovy in november 2010 and now. He doesn’t score, shoot enough? fair enough, but still he was creating scoring chances every time with his passing game. Basically, he’s not that lost floater in the middle of the ice anymore, this era is over. It’s too early to know how much he may be helpful already but to my eye he’s no more a concern.

And Kovy often needs a bit of time to heating up, so it’s not too bad

"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"

by Elektrostal_Kid on Nov 17, 2011 3:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Kovalchuk never skated at full speed last night…

1- He NEEDS to shoot more!!

2- Kovy should play on the left wing! So much easier for one-timer and one to one rush!

Great win by the Devils!!

by kovalchuk007 on Nov 17, 2011 3:18 PM EST reply actions  

I never understood why Zach always gets LW. In my opinion he is the more versatile forward, and he was the one who has played center.

Joshd12
Brock University
BA. Sports Management, 2014
BA. Recreation and Leisure Studies

by joshd12 on Nov 17, 2011 9:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Wins: 9
Points: 19
Games Played: 17
Games Remaining: 65
% of Season Done 20.7%
Max Points: 149
At Pace To (Points): 92
Wins/Games: 0.53
At Pace to (Wins): 43

another game not shown on gamecenter …. still mad about it :)

by Devils_from_Seattle on Nov 17, 2011 6:08 PM EST reply actions  

No discipline for the Myers head hit on Zubrus

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vA5ysUDLTeg

http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/hockey/post/_/id/5370/myers-avoids-fine-suspension-for-zubrus-hit

Sorry but this is just wrong. Shanahan claims the head wasn’t targeted? I think Myers knew exactly what he was doing, led with his shoulder and elbow and ended up both skates off the ice for good luck. How this was not a penalty and a suspension I just don’t know. I would at least like to see a video with Shanahan explaining exactly why this is ok, and then A-Train you have your license to do the exact same without suspension.

{shakes head in disgust}

by AlienDev on Nov 17, 2011 9:51 PM EST reply actions  

Thx for linking this.

Sorry, I tend to agree with Shanajsn for this. It does not appear Myers squared up and made a run at his head, per the prototypical Cooke, Carcillo, or Kaleta hits/ elbows/ or headbutts.

Rather, this one is a quick decision over a contested puck very much during the run of play. The height differential played a factor, and Myers has no history of headshots apparently.

In sum, it didn’t appear vindictive, intentional, or with the purpose of causing injury.

I will note, though, that I don’t have the text of the rule handy.

by Alan Wright on Nov 18, 2011 7:29 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

He was lining him up for 2 or 3 strides. Then leaves his feet. I don’t know. It is close.

Also the hit wasn’t necessary. Myers played the body instead of the puck. Which he could have.

They are trying to protect players and this isn’t called? Come on.

by NJDOhio on Nov 18, 2011 7:55 PM EST up reply actions  

^ this.

Both feet off and flew into the boards enough to drop his stick too.

by AlienDev on Nov 18, 2011 7:59 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s true, he did vault into Zuby and left his feet. I thought he left his feet as a consequence of the check, not to execute it.

Since that’s the case, the penalty at least should be charging, R 42.1

http://www.nhl.com/ice/page.htm?id=26331

That is separate, however, from whether the illegal check to the head is fineable/ suspendable with supplemental discipline due to the subjectivity of whether the head is targeted (which I didn’t think it was).

by Alan Wright on Nov 23, 2011 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

That is: I at first thought he left his feet as a consequence of the check, but now I see otherwise. Good spot there by NJDOhio.

by Alan Wright on Nov 23, 2011 12:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Here’s the link to 48.1 Illegal Check to the Head:

http://www.nhl.com/ice/page.htm?id=64063

Excerpt:
“48.1 Illegal Check to the Head – A hit resulting in contact with an opponent’s head where the head is targeted and the principal point of contact is not permitted. However, in determining whether such a hit should have been permitted, the circumstances of the hit, including whether the opponent put himself in a vulnerable position immediately prior to or simultaneously with the hit or the head contact on an otherwise legal body check was avoidable, can be considered.”

The bit that is subjective is the “where the head is targeted”. I personally think that those words should be removed, so regardless of intent, it’s a foul, and the targeting is not considered for the supplemental discipline. I.e. the onus for Zubie’s safety there was entirely in the hands of Myers, and we could have easily lost Zubie for a year with concussion. I though that those were the exact types of hits that the NHL wanted to remove from the sport.

by AlienDev on Nov 18, 2011 7:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Ah, but you’re forgetting rule 48.1a:

It is always a clean hit if the targeted player is on the Devils.

Status quo.

by nyynygnjd on Nov 18, 2011 8:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks. I responded to your other post.

by Alan Wright on Nov 23, 2011 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the New Jersey Devils! New here? Check out the Rules and Guidelines before posting.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

The_official_web_site___new_jersey_devils_small
FOR THE LOVE OF THE DEVILS...PLEASE DON'T SELL YOUR TICKETS TO RANGERS FANS

Recent FanPosts

Small
Games Played in the Conference Playoffs: A History Lesson
Small
Line Changes...Again
Small
Cup or Bust?
31519_397927484582_78722009582_3938348_414926_n_small
Question for you NJ natives.
Claude_small
Post your press conference question(s) for John Tortorella here.
Pig_face_small
Mar-ty, Hen-ke
Small
Top Secret Agent or Cranky Middle Aged Man?
Small
Karma, and Pucks, and Chips Oh My,
Small
No Blue Campaign -- Tickets for Sale
Small
On Shot Blocking

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

joomla visitors

Managers

Stanley_cup_and_you_-_sbn_small John Fischer

Authors

Puddy_small Tom Stivali

Marty_sbetter_small Matthew Ventolo

Zidlickymania_small Kevin Sellathamby

1729_small Matt Evans SNC