Game 18 Preview: New Jersey Devils at Tampa Bay Lightning
The Time: 7:00 PM EDT
The Broadcast: TV - MSG+2; Radio - 660 AM WFAN
The Matchup: The New Jersey Devils (9-7-1) at the Tampa Bay Lightning (9-7-2)
The Last Devils Game: The Devils went into Buffalo on the second half of a back-to-back set of games. Believe it or not, the Devils won with their offense. Zach Parise scored a shorthanded goal; Ilya Kovalchuk returned and scored a 5-on-4 goal (really!); Mark Fayne scored off a faceoff; Patrik Elias hammered a shot just outside the slot; and David Clarkson scored on a breakaway. While the Sabres pressed to make it a game, they couldn't catch the Devils. New Jersey won 5-3; my recap of the game is right here.
The Last Lightning Game: The Lightning returned to Tampa Bay after decisively losing their previous two games on the road. They hosted the Pittsburgh Penguins and proceeded to frustrate them for 60 minutes. The first period seemed even enough except that Vincent Lecavalier scored to make it 1-0. The Bolts doubled their lead with an early power play goal and the Pens responded with offense, trying to get back in the game. Dwayne Roloson denied them over and over in the second period. At the start of the third, Tampa Bay made it 3-0 on another power play. Later on amid more penalties. Pittsburgh tried pulling the goalie for some additional offense but all they did was hand Lecavalier a breakaway to score an empty-netter. The Pens got one back late but it would only be that one out of 34 shots to beat Roloson. The Lightning won 4-1 in their first regulation victory this month. Clark J Brooks at Raw Charge has this recap of the game.
The Goal: The Devils need to be prepared to make adjustments all night long. Thanks to the petulance of the Second Rate Rivals, the Lightning are known for their 1-3-1 defensive system. The truth is that head coach Guy Boucher tends to mix up his tactics and match-ups as the situation sees fit. The latter is incredibly important as it partially explains why the Lightning are 6-1-0 at home (six straight wins) but 3-6-2 on the road. Since Devils head coach Peter DeBoer also likes to match his lines and pairings, how each coach responds to their tactics play out on the ice will be critical for either team to succeed. Boucher has the advantage of the last change for faceoffs; DeBoer needs to keep sharp during the run of play and the players can help him out by maintaining possession as much as possible.
As usual, I have a few more thoughts on tonight's game after the jump. For the opposition's point of view, please check out Raw Charge.
The New Jersey Devils' lineup will remain unchanged with one exception on the fourth line. On Thursday, Vladimir Zharkov was sent down to Albany. With Ilya Kovalchuk returning on Wednesday against the Sabres, Zharkov wasn't really needed as a spare forward. Mattias Tedenby, who was scratched after playing one of his best games this season Tuesday, will be back in the lineup tonight per this post by Tom Gulitti. Where will he be? He was slotted in as the fourth line left winger in Friday's practice according this post by Gulitti. Hopefully, he's not going to stay there the whole game. I'd like to see him rotate shifts with Nick Palmieri unless Palmieri is having a fabulous game alongside Ryan Carter and David Clarkson.The Devils seem to be fairly healthy coming off that back-to-back with Boston and Buffalo. Kovalchuk looked rusty in Buffalo, but he's fine and should be considerably less rusty tonight. Dainius Zubrus got tagged with a head-shot by Tyler Myers; but he's fine after playing through that hit. Both players are on separate lines with different responsibilities; but keep an eye on both of them all the same just to see how they'll look tonight. I'm hoping that with Mattias Ohlund still out injured, one of the lines these two are on regularly goes up against Marc-Andre Bergeron. I'd love to see Kovalchuk just go right after the diminutive defender; or to see Zubrus force him to play along boards to win a puck.
As for the Devils defense, it'll remain as it is. Hopefully, Adam Larsson won't beaten on too much and he'll have more success in stopping the other team and getting the puck forward. He had to be protected in the Boston game and he was just "there" in the Buffalo game. I'm kind of worried he and Andy Greene are going to see a lot of Lecavalier and Steven Stamkos. While facing off against top NHL forwards on the road is nothing new for this team, it's still a challenge all the same. As a whole, I'd like to see the Devils defense ward off the opposition from putting up 12+ shots in the third period. This happened in the last two Devils games. Boston really pounded the Devils in the third period; and Buffalo tried to make it a game and came somewhat close to doing so. Those are two different situations, and the latter doesn't bother me as much as the former. Quelling the Lightning would not only help their chances of winning this game, but further stoke the blueline's confidence.
As far as the Lightning goes, let's get one thing straight: their not a defensive power house. Despite all the hoopla about the 1-3-1; the Lightning are 24th in the league in shots against per game with 31.7 and 23rd in the league in goals against per game with 3. In 5-on-5 situations, the Lightning look a little better as they are only 20th in the league with 30.5 SA/60 and 21st in team save percentage at 90.9% per Behind the Net. Speaking of Behind the Net, the Lightning players have earned mostly negative on-ice Corsi values this season. These stats tell me that the Lightning have been leaky when it comes to allowing shots on net, shot attempts, and goals. Part of this is due to Mattias Ohlund still out with a knee injury, of course, but it definitely puts lie to the notion that the 1-3-1 is some difficult system to break down.
Are the Lightning even getting shots of their own, though? No. They average 29 shots per game, which puts them in a three-way tie with Carolina and Winnipeg. Per Behind the Net, they're 23rd at 5-on-5 with 27.6 SF/60. The Lightning are finding success at evens, though, with a team shooting percentage of 9.3%, the 7th best percentage in the league. They may not have to shoot the lights out of their opponents, should they score a couple of goals.
The above players have been driving production for the Lightning. You should not at all be surprised that Steven Stamkos, Lecavaier, and Martin St. Louis are among the top. They play a lot of minutes, they ooze skill, they love to shoot, and they create problems against any defense. There's nothing much more to say about them other than that the Devils have be especially careful when they are on the ice.
The other three have chipped in quite a few points. Marc-Andrw Bergeron isn't known for his defensive prowess, but he's been putting up enough points to be a threat at the point. He notably gets more offensive zone starts than the rest of the blueline, and with 3 goals and 14 assists, it's understandable. Also: Boucher doesn't want him in tougher situations unless he's forced to. Those have gone to to Eric Brewer and Viktor Hedman (Aside: He's zero in on-ice Corsi despite being thrown into tough situations constantly. He's quite good.) based on their sub-30% offensive zone start usage. Teddy Purcell's been hot with his shooting and so he represents a secondary scoring threat like Ryan Malone. Malone has sat out the last few games, but according to this tweet by the St. Petersburg Times' Damian Cristodero, it appears he'll be back in the lineup tonight (along with Dwayne Roloson starting). Should the Devils somehow keep the Lightning's big three quiet, these are three other skaters who can ruin their night.
In a similar fashion, it's a question as to what version of Dwayne Roloson will start tonight. His overall numbers for this season suggest that he has been vulnerable. However, he has run hot-and-cold in his last 5 appearances. In two of them, he's allowed 4 goals each and was pulled in the Lightning's 5-3 loss to Winnipeg. In the other three, he stepped in relief for Mathieu Garon and stopped 29 shots in a 4-3 win over Florida; held Philly to 1 goal out of 15 shots in that infamous game; and stopped 33 of 34 from Pittsburgh on Thursday. It's not so much he's been bad; just inconsistent for one reason or another. Roloson will likely square off with Martin Brodeur in net, who is also an older goaltender who's been playing better than his numbers suggest.
Lastly, a few thoughts about Tampa Bay's special teams. The Lightning are in the middle of the league when it comes to power play conversion rate (16.7%) and penalty kill success rate (83.3%). The Bolts have reason to feel good about both, as their PP went 2-for-6 against Pittsburgh while not allowing any goals across 7 situations. However, the PK success rate doesn't necessarily mean The 4-on-5 situation numbers at Behind the Net show that Tampa Bay has allowed 56.8 SA/60 in 4-on-5 situations this season, the fifth highest in the league. That doesn't speak well of the PK at all; it means they've been riding their goaltending to PK success. I don't know whether that will last over time, it might tonight, but most opposing teams can get a lot of looks at the net during man advantages - that's something most teams would try and exploit if given the stance.
Notice that I wrote "most." The Devils power play remains punchless despite scoring a power play goal in each of their last two games and the return of Ilya Kovalchuk. They're dead last in generating shots with a SF/60 of 37.4 in 5-on-4 situations; and they still only have 5 goals scored in those situations - also the lowest in the NHL. I don't think the Bolts PK has a whole lot to worry about. As for the Devils, I'd make discipline a point if only to prevent Stamkos, Lecavalier, and/or St. Louis from exploiting the additional space they will get from a power play. Their power play may not be statistically high in the league, but giving excellent forwards man advantages to work with is always a poor choice.
While the Devils would be best served to keep this game at even strength as much as possible, that makes match-ups and tactical adjustments more important. Can DeBoer succeed in getting the Elias line and/or the pairing of Henrik Tallinder and Mark Fayne out there against Tampa Bay's top forwards? If not, can the Henrique line and the other two pairings avoid getting steamrolled? How the players perform and how each coach responds to the play at hand will be crucial. Let's hope the Devils can drive through the Lightning defense and at least give Roloson a heavy workload as they fend off Tampa Bay's percentage-riding attack.
Now that you've read my thoughts on the game, I want to know yours. What do you think will happen tonight? Will the Devils offense continue their scoring ways against a team whose defense hasn't been all that strong? Will the Devils defense keep the Bolts from lighting it up - from their big three or others? What other aspect of the game do you think will be important for the Devils to win this game? Please leave your answers and other thoughts on tonight's game in the comments. Thank you for reading.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
(in movie trailer voice)
In a world where goalies start young…a world where age can kill…two men rise above it all to face off against each other.
The winner will be hailed as king of the old goalies. The loser will go home and have a nice, warm glass of milk before going to bed.
This November, look out for
Oldtender Duel
by Dr. Witticism on Nov 19, 2011 7:44 AM EST reply actions 7 recs
I think the Lightning are a very formidable team, but I think with the way the Devils have been playing, we can handle them.
I’m a fan of ‘Traps’, and I like their 1-3-1, especially after SI did a report on it during the last playoffs. However there’s always a way to beat it, and I’m sure that by matching our lines correctly, we’ll break through and score a number of goals.
Last year we beat Tampa 3/4 times, with the score being 2-1 in a win and a loss, and the other two wins were 6-3 and 5-2. I think we can definitely score some goals on them, but agaisnt this tema you can’t take penalties, you just can’t.
And Kovalchuk speeds away, great moves, busting through, DID YOU SEE THAT?
What’s a few strategies to break the 1-3-1? Do you dump it deep and chase, or try to match numbers in neutral ice?
The Flying V!
In Lou We Trust: SBN Blog of the New Jersey Devils
by Matthew Ventolo on Nov 19, 2011 1:08 PM EST up reply actions
To beat the trap you have to pull your forwards back to your blue line and break out with 5 men. That way there is a pass to make when the initial puck carrier gets trapped. The pass receiver then continues on until he can either skate the puck in or dump it in deep. If he gets trapped then he makes a pass, the idea is to have 3 or 4 options for the puck carrier to pass to. The idea of trapping is to get someone to make a bad stretch pass, lots of short passes counters this. These passes are either lateral passes or passes behind them. You have to be patient and not force the puck forward. Because you are moving as a unit, even if you do skate it in, you usually have to make a hard dump to get the puck in deep or at the alternate side side-boards. Once you are in deep and you have the puck in control, then you run your normal set-up offense.
The reason teams don’t like this is because it slows them down. You can’t have one guy deke and weave through the neutral zone and set up offense on the rush. Nor can you make a 2 line pass to have 2 or 3 guys in on the rush against 2 or 3 opponents. You have to fight for every inch of ice and you don’t get to generate offense off the rush. I find it funny that all Tampa had to do to counter the rule changes they made during the lock out was to move one defender up and the other one back, that negates the 2 line pass potential and negates the trapezoid. Lemaire would be impressed. As for the Flyers, what they did in that game is a perfect symbol for what I think this “New NHL” embodies. If someone is trying to stop you from scoring, throw a hissy fit, stop trying, and blame it on the other guy.
There is nothing quite as satisfying as out running security after you've punched out a Flyers fan!
"I was in the moment, and the moment said smack you." - Bruce Willis
This is why I love ILWT. Thanks slackdog – a great education for me (been watching hockey 5 years, and still learning this stuff). So pre-lockout trap – would you put all 5 skaters in the neutral zone?
Pre-lockout trap you put the left wing just over the other teams blue line, 2 forwards behind the blue line and the 2 defensemen on the red line. It isn’t a 1-3-1, it’s a 1-2-2 because there is no threat of a 2-line pass. The trap evolved to the 1-3-1 to keep teams from being able to make a 2-line pass and then break in that way.
There is nothing quite as satisfying as out running security after you've punched out a Flyers fan!
"I was in the moment, and the moment said smack you." - Bruce Willis
The fact that TB is 24th in shots against and 23rd in goals against proves that all of the 1-3-1 bashing by boneheads like Milbury and Keith Jones was just a bunch of nonsense. Yup, they should really make that trap illegal, Jeremy Roenick. How is a team supposed to win and entertain their fans when they can only score an average of 3 goals a game on a team? Baseless narratives are the lifeblood of sports analysis on TV.
Status quo.
I think we are really spoiled to have the services of a great writer like John doing these previews, reports and technical analyses. Sampling the other side previews, I have yet to see anything of John’s caliber. Keep it up friend.
by AlienDev on Nov 19, 2011 12:56 PM EST reply actions 3 recs
Thanks.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Nov 19, 2011 4:33 PM EST up reply actions

by 





















