New Jersey Devils Beat Columbus Blue Jackets 2-1 in the Shootout Despite Ugly Third Period
Like all sports, the National Hockey League is a results-oriented business. By the end of the season, it's not how a team won games that determines whether they'll be playing in the postseason and their opponents. It's if they won enough games and earned enough points to get there. There are no additional points in the standings for whether a team won decisively or just scraped by somehow.
Yet, we are fans of the New Jersey Devils and we know better than to pre-judge a team by their record. The Columbus Blue Jackets came into this game with the worst record in hockey at 5-13-2. Yet, that didn't matter in their last 5 games in which they went 3-1-1. It definitely didn't matter tonight once the puck dropped. Record aside, I didn't think they were the worst team in hockey in my preview of this game. I felt they proved me right on the ice at the Prudential Center this evening. After all, they did what Boston, Buffalo, Tampa Bay, and especially Florida did in New Jersey's last four games: own the third period.
The game wasn't leaning in one team's direction too much in the first period. I felt the Devils were fine after a sluggish start; their power plays helped get them going. The second period saw the home team get a goal and the visitors get several chances but came away with nothing. At the second intermission, shots were tied 17-17 and the Devils were up 1-0. A larger lead is always preferable, but it wasn't bad.
Then the third period came and the Devils got dumb. While killing a minor penalty to start the third period, Zach Parise tripped Nikita Nitikin to give Columbus a short 5-on-3. The Devils killed that and Parise's minor; but they didn't respond all that well. Columbus equalized when a long shot from Marc Methot hit Anton Volchenkov, then Jared Boll's skate, and then trickled into the net. The equalizer was a literal bad bounce against New Jersey. The Devils got a power play not long afterwards but the team registered only one shot on net - their last until a minute into overtime - and not long after it ended, Adam Larsson went into the box for holding. The Jackets piled up shot after shot for the rest of the game. The Devils certainly tried to attack but they kept turning the puck over on offense. They had a few too many in their own end too. Martin Brodeur stood on his head, stopping 16 out of 17 shots in the third period. It's never good when a team gets half of their shots on net in regulation in one single period.
In that regard, the Devils should be pleased they got into overtime. If it wasn't for Brodeur and some fortunate situations, the Blue Jackets could have done what the Panthers did on Monday. Overtime was much better; I felt the Devils took more control of the puck. They actually got more shots on net in those 5 minutes than in the 20 minutes of the third period. A shootout became necessary. There, the Devils claimed the second point thanks to Ilya Kovalchuk, Zach Parise, and the Devils' hero, Martin Brodeur. How he was not the media's first star of the game, I do not know; Brodeur pretty much carried the Devils through the third period.
That's precisely the problem. As great as getting a win is in the big picture, the fact that the Devils blew another lead after a game where they really botched a big one is disheartening. It's frustrating to see the Devils get out-shot 17-3 in their own building in just one period. It's maddening that a team doubled-up in shots on net in just 20 minutes. It'd be one thing if the Devils were up by 3 or 4 goals and the other team was just desperate. But the Devils only had the one and weren't sharp or smart with the score in mind to add to it or maintain it. On another night, they lose this game in a heartbreaking and rage-inducing manner. We should be thankful it didn't. The Devils players and coaches have learn from these experiences soon because scraping out wins like this isn't always going to be an option. Just like in Sunrise on Monday.
As usual I have a few more thoughts on tonight's game after the jump. For the opposition's take on this game, Matt Wagner of The Cannon has this recap available.
The Stats: The NHL.com Game Summary | The NHL.com Event Summary | The NHL.com Play by Play Log | The NHL.com Shot Summary | The Time on Ice Shift Charts | The Time on Ice Head to Head Ice Time Charts | The Time on Ice Corsi ChartsThe Highlights: From NHL.com, here are the highlights for this game:
Why Now I Include the Shot Summary in These Recaps: When looking at the event summary, I noticed that Zach Parise put up 7 shots on net in 20:35 of ice time. This surprised me. Normally, a forward putting 7 shots on net is a sign he did something right in the game. Yet, I didn't think he played all that well. Again, I liked his forechecking, but the captain wasn't exactly leading his team onward. Then I looked at the shot summary: 2 shots at even strength in the first period, 3 on the power play in the first period (I guess those jams at the net count for something), and 2 in overtime. Basically, I recall Parise's lack of events from the second and third periods (one penalty taken, one turnover that led to the play that resulted in Boll's goal); but the overall sheet notes his good first period and overtime and just lists that. Fortunately, the shot summary parses that down.
Really? Nothing?: Believe it or not, Ilya Kovalchuk ended up with no shots on net. He's officially credited with one attempt blocked and two misses. I swore he missed the net on more than just two shot attempts just on the two power plays in the first period. Alas, the scorer did not think so. I was actually surprised to see this myself.
By the by, Parise & Kovalchuk achieved little offensive results in the third period. Then again, so did the rest of the team. If Peter DeBoer isn't going to break up the Elias line, then maybe these two just need to switch sides or something. Something's got to be adjusted.
I Love The Penalty Kill (And I'm Frightened As To If/When It Gets Cold): Anton Volchenkov returned to the lineup and played the second-most minutes on the Devils this evening at 22:45. He played a huge 6:38 on the penalty kill. He was just in the wrong place, wrong time when Methot's shot hit him and then bounced off Boll's skate and into the net. I felt Volchenkov had a fine night as the main man on the Master Killer Penalty Killing Units that the New Jersey Devils have.
Once again, the Devils did not concede a power play goal. While they only yielded one shot on goal while shorthanded, they did rush up ice to at least kill clock and force Columbus to defend a little. They weren't as lights-out in shot prevention, though. After only allowing 3 on net across 4 opportunities in the first two periods, the Blue Jackets got 7 power play shots on net during a carried-over penalty and two other opportunities. Yes, 7 of the 17 shots on net came from the power play. So the PK units got worked over a bit in the third; but overall, not at all a bad effort. It also helped that Martin Brodeur was what cool kids in the mid-1990s called "the bomb."
I Hate That the PK Had to Play 11:40 Out of 60 Tonight: Six penalties! As much as people may want to point to the coaches, this is all on the players. After all, the coaches are on the bench, they're not fouling the opposition on the ice. I'll concede that the boarding call on Anton Volchenkov was odd considering Tim Sestito got boarded in a similar way a little bit beforehand which yielded no call. Yet, the others were legit and entirely avoidable. When will the players learn that the best penalty kills are the ones that don't have to be taken in the first place? Apparently not yet. It's a reason why the third period was such a hot mess for New Jersey and if it's not addressed by the players soon, then it could be a reason for some future losses.
Do You Hate the Power Play?: Well, I can't say I fully hated the power play tonight. They only allowed one middling shot against, and they had 6 for. They looked decent on their first two opportunities. I wish Parise would try and lift the puck instead of just jamming it in down low, but I suspect that's now how the play goes. Anyway, the third one was a bit of a waste, which was unfortunate since it came not long after Columbus scored.
The Quasi-Goon Section: Cam Janssen sure had a game tonight. Like the Devils, he didn't look so bad as the game began. After Mattias Tedenby drew a hook by Grant Clitsome; Janssen discombobulated Derek Dorsett into his own bench. That would be his positive highlight of the night. The fourth line was continuing to get the occasional shift in the second period and #25 wasn't out of place. Late in the second period, Janssen tried to wreck Jared Boll but he went in too rough and got a deserved two minutes. After that penalty was killed, he tried to stick-lift Antoine Vermette from behind but he apparently got his hands and so went right to the box. Janssen was then stapled to the bench.
The amazing thing is that Janssen had went six games without taking a minor penalty. Of course, all good things must come to an end. Tonight, it was in an emphatic fashion. He took two minors in a row, they were bone-headed penalties, and so instead of having a shot at seeing more ice time than he has had all season, he got a front row seat to the rest of the game. We'll see if he knows any better in the next game he plays in.
A Good Coaching Adjustment: I'm certain DeBoer will get some flack for another bad third period performance by the Devils. Some of it is deserved; but I do want to highlight a particular adjustment. In the second period, the Blue Jackets were able to exploit the Devils' defense pinching in and got quite a few odd man rushes and breakaways. Brodeur and the recovering defense held up well, so Columbus didn't make the most of it. Yet, seeing Columbus forwards vivisect the Devils through the neutral zone like an eleventh-grade high school class studying frogs was something that had to be stopped. For all of the that was bad of the third period, the Blue Jackets didn't beat the Devils off the rush. The defensemen did a better job dropping back. That was a good one. If only the Devils had a few more this evening.
The Tedenby Frustration: In the first period, Mattias Tedenby was flying on the fourth line. Usually by himself, but he stood out against Columbus' bottom six. While he registered no shots on net, he did draw two penalties. It looked like that he would go on to have a pretty good night.
Well, he did get some shifts with David Clarkson and Ryan Carter. Yet, Tedenby's contribution to the game really ended in that first period. He didn't do too much since then even when he was out there with Carter and Clarkson. This is the source of frustration with Tedenby. He'll have some good shifts or a good period, but he'll do very little outside of it. Had Tedenby at least kept hustling throughout the game, then that would be a step forward. Hopefully, he'll make it soon - not that Nick Palmieri's making a better case for himself or anything like that.
Adam Larsson Fun Fact: Larsson put up 3 shots on net, had 3 attempts blocked, and officially missed once. If it wasn't for Parise's 7 shots on net, Larsson would have led the Devils in shooting attempts in this game. One of them led to Zubrus' goal, too; so he picked up his fifth assist of the season. That said, insert your usual "please stop giving the puck away in your own end of the rink" statement to Larsson here. It definitely applies from this game.
Get the Matchups? Got It? Good: In terms of Corsi, the Devils finished the game at -10. That's understandably disappointing since they were out-shot by 14 in the third period alone. Yet, the key match-ups that DeBoer got weren't the main culprits. The Adam Henrique line got matched with the Blue Jackets' checking line (Sami Pahlsson, Dorsett, Vermette) for the most part and they weren't too negative (-1 for Parise, -4 for double-shifted Kovalchuk, and somehow a +5 for Henrique). The Patrik Elias line got the Jeff Carter line most of the time and they finished the game not too far below zero as well: -1 for Zubrus, -3 for Elias, +1 for Sykora. That's not bad at all for a unit that consists of Jeff Carter, Rick Nash, and Vinny Prospal who put up a combined 14 out of Columbus' 36 shots on net in the game. Of course, it helps that they only got 7 of those 14 at even strength.
However, the Devils' bottom six got wrecked for the most part. Carter was a -9, Clarkson was a -5, Tedenby was a -7, and Sestito was a -4 (energy! He...didn't bring much). Somehow, Palmieri avoided this by finishing a +2 but he only played 8:17 of ice time. Carter and Clarkson saw plenty of the Mark Letestu line. Ryan Johansen racked up 5 shots on net all at even strength, so that really helped bring them down. Tedenby and Sestito saw the Pahlsson line quite a bit and while they were a checking line, they still got forward. In retrospect, that's pretty bad and the coaches may want to be a bit concerned about the defense of those bottom two lines in future games.
Also wrecked in Corsi: Henrik Tallinder (-6) and Mark Fayne (-8). They took the brunt of the Carter line with the Letestu line behind them in terms of head-to-head ice time. Given that those two lines fired plenty of shots this evening, it's safe to say that those two had to be sharp in cleaning up loose pucks and picking up open men. They were for the most part; but they couldn't do it such that the play would be driven forward.
Ping!: Carter can claim to have beaten Martin Brodeur this evening. Off an offensive zone turnover by Kovalchuk (story of the third period for the Devils' attack), Carter skated in and fired a long shot that hit iron instead of the net. Thankfully, he was kept off the score sheet; but with 6 shots on net, 10 official attempts on net, and one that rang off the goal frame, it's clear that Carter is back to being a threat. Thankfully, the Devils don't have to see him, Rick Nash, or Vinny Prospal again this season.
A Quote from Kovalchuk: In Tom Gulitti's post-game post, Kovalchuk said the following about the team's third period performance.
"Marty stood on his head," Kovalchuk said. "We can’t play like that in the last 20 minutes. I think we had three shots on net and they got (17). We’ve got to be much better. That’s for sure. We just stopped doing what the coaches tell us to do. We started backing off and waited for them to come. We’ve got to stick to our system for all 60 minutes."
The bold emphasis is my own; and it's a concerning. Why did the players stop? Why didn't leadership say, "Hey, let's get back to what we're supposed to be doing" during a TV timeout or a break in the action? This may be just for one night, so I wouldn't panic over this. I'm not. But I'm raising an eyebrow that Kovalchuk would be this candid. Let's hope it is just a one night issue.
Oh, and I don't think the Devils backed off until the final minute of the period or so. They just turned the puck over way too many times while trying to attack. This wasn't like the Boston game where the Bruins forced the Devils to do nothing but defend, get a clearance, get a line change, and repeat. This wasn't like the Florida game on Monday where the Devils vainly forechecked and got sloppy all over the rink. Tonight, the Devils did OK getting into Columbus' end but when they had a little possession in their end, the players forced a lot of bad passes that Columbus defenders were more than happy to takeaway and turn into attacks up ice.
Goaltender Love: Curtis Sanford is a better goaltender than Steve Mason. He showed again tonight. He didn't waver when Parise went for another close-up jam. He didn't freak out when the Devils were trying to fire long shots with the intent of hitting traffic or a deflection. He played the puck fairly well outside of the net save for one gaffe that Clarkson nearly had (Columbus D picked him up). Sanford was only bested in regulation off a rebound that Dainius Zubrus put away so cleanly, you would have thought it went into a passivation tank or something. If I'm Scott Arniel, I'm rolling with Sanford even when Mason gets healthy.
Martin Brodeur was better though. He had to be better. He had a slow start to the game by the Devils skaters to deal with. He had crashing players to deal with. He had odd man rushes in the second period and just a lot of rubber in general in the third period to deal with. Save for an unfortunate bounce off Volchenkov and off Boll and Carter hitting iron instead of the net, Brodeur had a fantastic night. Again, why he wasn't the first star of the game, I do not know. Instead, it went to Jared Boll. Boll drew two calls, had one shot on net, finished a -1 in Corsi, and had a puck bounce off his skate for his goal. The media at the game felt that was superior to Brodeur's performance. Balderdash. The Devils don't even get into overtime without how well #30 played.
At Least the Devils Are Great At Shootouts: I will say this, Kovalchuk's and Parise's moves in the shootout are sick-nasty. The only way Sanford was beaten more dead to rights than on each shot would have to involve formaldehyde somehow. Brodeur participated in his first shootout of the season and like the 65 minutes he played prior, he was superb in stopping both shots from Nash and Letestu. It got the Devils a second point, so, "yay."
Those are my thoughts on tonight's game, now I want to know yours. Other than "garbage third period," what did you think of the Devils performance tonight? What must the Devils try and improve for their upcoming home-and-home with the Islanders? Who from this game stood out tonight from your perspective? Please leave your answers and other thoughts about tonight's game in the comments. Thanks to everyone who read and commented in the gamethread, thanks to everyone who followed @InLouWeTrust during the game, and thank you for reading.
37 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I feel like there were a lot of defensive breakdowns. The quality chances the other teams have been getting are higher than others. Some of the powerplay work tonight was good though, but that 2 on 0 Colombus had was just way over the top, how can that really happen.
And Kovalchuk speeds away, great moves, busting through, DID YOU SEE THAT?
How? Easy – the other D man went off for a line change. Tallinder passed it to Tedenby and Tedenby was not hard on the puck at all so it was turned over, and Columbus had two guys in front of NJ’s guys.
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
The fact that Salvador is so slow that he couldn’t recover is embarassing to say the least
And Kovalchuk speeds away, great moves, busting through, DID YOU SEE THAT?
He had just come off the bench. Tedenby has to get that puck deep. He barely played after that.
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
I didn’t know that Tedenby had a hand in that. That would explain his sub-10 minute night.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Nov 24, 2011 12:54 PM EST up reply actions
All of these shootout wins are going to kill us towards the end of the season when were fighting for a playoff spot / a decent seed.
JUST WIN IN REGULATION
by Marty'sBetter30 on Nov 24, 2011 1:26 AM EST reply actions
not necessarily.
"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"
by Elektrostal_Kid on Nov 24, 2011 1:58 AM EST up reply actions
I think it’s starting to a bit of a concern, as well. The Devils have 6 ROW. The only team with less in the Eastern Conference are the Islanders.
It’s too early to really start getting worried about it, though. At this point in the season, where the Devils are with injuries and their overall play, getting points is the most important thing. Don’t fall behind the pack. It’s only a quarter way through the season. The 4-9 spots in the Eastern Conferences are only separated by FOUR points.
In conclusion .. yes, it could hurt them later, but right now points are the most important thing. This team has shown signs of promise. If they can get Zajac back before the end of the year, I think they will be in much better shape if they can hang around 7-9 in the East.
Right now, you don’t worry about winning games in the shootout just because of a tiebreak — the chances that said tiebreak will come into play are not very large, even at the end of the season.
You worry about winning all these games in the shootout because it creates a lot of three-point games, which in turn makes it harder to make the playoffs because teams have more points. Seven out of twenty Devils games have gone past the regulation sixty minutes (35%)…. the NHL average over a typical season usually floats between 20% and 25%. Thankfully for us, five of the seven games in question have been against the other conference and those teams aren’t competing with us for the postseason. Even more thankfully for us, the Devils have won six of the seven “extra time” games.
Why do you have the same exact username as me?
by Marty's Better #30 on Nov 24, 2011 12:23 PM EST up reply actions
who cares…a win is a win unless we end in a tie, (which we wouldn’t be in if we didn’t have a disgusting looking shootout lineup).
Basically…at the worst we drop down 1 spot in the seed. and if we end up tied at 8th based on just shootouts alone we don’t deserve to be in the playoffs anyways (since there are no shootouts).
Winning in a shootout/overtime is superior to the alternative – losing them.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Nov 24, 2011 12:50 PM EST up reply actions
Kovalchuk/Parise Conundrum
Most people would agree that the Devils need 75 goals combined from K and P to be a playoff team, espesially on a team worth in the league in goal scorring last year. And one of the biggest concerns through 20 games has been the inability of either to really get going. One hopes they are both healthy, but Kovy has been adequate, and the last 20 games has probably been the most forgettable of Parise’s career since he emerged as a genuine NHL star. Moreover, they seem unable to gel on the same line. i have been a consistent advocate of separating them and one hopes that Zajac’s return will make that possible. But they have only really excelled on the shooot out, and thankfully because the devils have had to win about half their games on the shootout. The real conundrum about judging this devils team is we dont really know how good they are. And K and P are a big part of the reason we dont know and thats probably the biggest elephant in the room amongst Devils fans talking hockey. THe question “how good are the devils really” almost always brings to mind “are Parise and Kovalchuk really elite players they need to be to carry the team offensively?” So far, the Devils have kept their heads above water without K and P playing at a high level and the complementary players like Zubrus and Clarkson have looked more than capable. But Kovalchuk is coming off a season in which he had a dominant second half, but not with Parise on the ice with him, and only resulting in 31 goals. And Parise is coming off a year long injury and has looked less than stellar in 20 games. Other than DeBoer not getting 60 minutes out of his team in just about every game, the ability of P and K to rise to the occasion is the biggest question mark of the first 6 weeks or so of the season.
I don’t agree at all. Clarkson and Sykora should get close to 20 goals. Once Elias’s sh% drops he should be low to mid 20’s in goals. Zubrus should chip in around 14 or 15. All of New Jersey’s top 9 should finish 10 + goals. I would bet on 5 20+ goal scorers and 9 10 + goal scorers.
At this point an ensemble cast of goal scorers sounds fine by me. Having a high goal scoring threat in both Kovy and Zach sound great in theory, but not if they’re not playing together well or cancelling each other out. Acasser has written a lot on separating them so I won’t try to steal his thunder.
At different points last year: Parise was injured, Kovy was flustered and unproductive, Langenbrunner was toxic or nagging (we thought), Zajac was invisible, Marty was injured or inconsistent, etc. So far, we’re seeing smatterings of that. But I think when they and the others start gelling, more goals will come.
Hopefully the Devs can play above .500 until Zajac returns, starting with a home-and-away series with the Islanders and a Western Conference road trip.
by Alan Wright on Nov 24, 2011 7:36 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
With or without an open net?
I’m assuming open net. Still, that’s a stretch.
In Lou We Trust: SBN Blog of the New Jersey Devils
by Matthew Ventolo on Nov 24, 2011 12:17 PM EST up reply actions
One assumes other players will chip in with goals beyond the “nine mythical forwards” reaching that mark. The defense will be good for 10-20 goals over the course of the season. Fourth line players and guys who take the shuttle from Newark to Albany and back again can chip in a few. In addition, I imagine some of those “nine mythical forwards” will go well beyond their 20 or 10 benchmark.
Your math is off, however. If you have five forwards with 20, and nine with at least ten, you come up with 140. The five guys who score 20 are already counted in your tally of ten…. so you have 5 × 20 = 100 and 4 × 10 = 40 (doing 9 × 10 double-counts a lot of goals).
That’s a good catch on my miscalculation. Your right the 1st five would be part of the 2nd nine. So I counted them twice.
So lets say 5 average 25 goals and 4 average 15. Whats that? 185 + 20 from the defense and another 10 from the 4th line. 215 total. That would workout.
I guess my point even with my math screw up was I agree with max16s. They need Kovalchuk&Parise scoring 75 goals or some combination of two people.
Whoa, I would definitely bet against 9 10+ goal scorers. Kovalchuk, Parise, Zubrus, Elias, Sykora, Henrique, Clarkson – sure. But Palmieri and Tedenby, I don’t see it. Carter, I definitely don’t see it. Zajac, who knows.
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
the math on what suggest will keep the devils in the bottom third of the league in scoring. Not exactly a winning strategy. Now, if K and P score 35 and we get 5 other 20 goal scorers, ok thats a team that can make, and perhaps, win in the playoffs. there is no way around it: K and P have to get going, and soon.
I don’t believe there’s a magic number that Parise+Kovy need to hit for the Devils to be a contender. I don’t think that’s a given in any scenario.
I do think, however, that they need to be on different lines to maximize their output. There were a few plays where they just seemed out of sync last night, and they have never really got going together.
The problem is that right now, they don’t have the center depth to split them up. The Elias line is simply too dominant against the other team’s top line to split them up. I think once Zajac returns they will have much more flexibility with what they can do.
I’m pretty sure it’s goal differential of 6 goals. So either if the Devils aren’t going to get many more goals, they’ll need to be stinger in allowing them. Generally, we’d like to see the team do both; but I think that goes without saying.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Nov 25, 2011 12:06 AM EST up reply actions
But wouldn’t a team like the Devils, who both generally score and give up fewer goals, be more likely to have a lower goals = win ratio? I’d guess that 6 goals = 1 win was league-wide and over a course of seasons, which makes it likely there are some teams above it and some teams below it. Maybe I’ll dig up the explanation for it and do the math.
Go Devils
Go Jets
eh, never mind. Either I’m figuring it wrong or this is a case where the average is pretty meaningless. Kind of weird how that article on broadstreet hockey had everything so close to the line. I found only 29 teams in the past 6 years who were between 5.4 and 6.6, and an overall average of 2.55.
Go Devils
Go Jets
3rd Period Breakdowns
The team, with some exceptions, has been brutal in too many games in the third period. Whether it is due to being out of shape, the star players being overworked or whatever, this has got to be corrected. The goaltending has been excellent and we’re scoring but the overall team defense has given the opposing teams too many good chances……..Watching this team in the 3rd periods has been painful.
First Star
Was Boll, I think? Nobody played stunningly but his goal was an accidental deflection. Did he have a lot ofice time and shot? Or is it because he had some shiners and took a shotup high and might have re-broken his nose?
Doesn’t matter, though. It’d just the stars. But, ithought both Gs played well and Marty was Martastic.
by Alan Wright on Nov 24, 2011 7:21 AM EST via mobile reply actions
I was at the game last night, and I will say Boll played a hard-fought game whenever I saw him on the ice. He played really well along the boards and won a lot of one-on-one battles. As much as I’d like a devil to be first star, I’m okay with this call.
He played 6:31 and he “scored” off his skate – his sole shot of the game (all goals are shots on net). He wasn’t bad but by no means was he the best player on the ice.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Nov 24, 2011 12:53 PM EST up reply actions
I love our shootout prowess.. but
It highlights our failure to properly utilize our talents. How Parise Henrique and Kovy struggle to put up points is beyond me, but if they do struggle it should be addressed. It seems without Zajac if you want to get points on this team you have to play with Elias. I’d hate to break up a good thing in Elias Zubs Sykora but maybe one of our stars should play with him.
On a final note, Volchenkov is a beast.
Zach
I think that Zach’s goal scoring is being affected because he’s playing too many heavy minutes, in too many situations. And when he’s on the ice he tries to lead by example. He hustles on the attack, backchecks hard on turnovers and forechecks with abandon. That kind of workload tiers him out, reducing the energy he needs to concentrate on getting pucks in the net. He needs to better manage his time on the ice, with an emphasis on scoring. Skating with Travis could help him do this.

by 























