Adam Henrique Breakaway Snags 3-2 OT Win for New Jersey Devils over Winnipeg Jets
The New Jersey Devils managed to win their first game in overtime this evening. They've played beyond regulation several times already this season, but each instance has always went to the shootout. Tonight, there was no need for one as Adam Henrique scored on his second breakaway of the night. The pivot got sprung in the neutral zone from a pass by Zach Parise and he sped ahead on the Winnipeg Jets' flank (namely, Brett Festerling). He made one move on Ondrej Pavelec, fired low, and the fans at the Rock erupted in cheers. An almost storybook-like ending for the New Jersey Devils' win over the Winnipeg Jets, 3-2.
However, the truth is more jarring than the narrative. The Devils really shouldn't have gone into overtime at all. They had a two goal lead heading into the third period and they squandered it. No, this was not the fault of Martin Brodeur. No, this was not the fault of a single player or line. It was the fault of the whole team. With a lead, the New Jersey attack resembled their offense first period - few and far between advances. The Jets won pucks in the neutral zone thanks in part to the Devils making errant pass after errant pass. The Jets, behind in the game, managed to pin back the Devils on several shifts. The Jets clawed their way back into the game on the strength of two extended offensive possessions.
The first goal was a Mark Flood shot that found it's way in through traffic; and the second goal came off a non-called hook that led to a takeaway that Jim Slater buried past Mark Fraser and Brodeur. But the Jets got those opportunities because they kept working at it; the Devils' true failure on both goals was being unable to get possession back and clear the puck. In the bigger picture, since the New Jersey offense was so inconsistent; the Jets kept having opportunities to attack the Devils. It was a bad period by the team on both fronts and they paid the price.
Thankfully, Adam Henrique got a one-on-one with the goaltender in overtime and made sure the Devils didn't botch the game. It'd be great for the Devils to win one in regulation against an in-conference opponent; and they could have done it tonight if it wasn't for that poor third period. Regardless, getting points is always the priority and they got both of them.
I have a few more thoughts on tonight's game after the jump. For the opposition's perspective, please check out this recap by TJCAPS at Arctic Ice Hockey.
The Stats: The NHL.com Game Summary | The NHL.com Event Summary | The NHL.com Play by Play Log | The Time on Ice Shift Charts | The Time on Ice Head to Head Ice Time Charts | The Time on Ice Corsi ChartsThe Highlights: Do you want to see an awful non-call? Do you want to see Mark Fraser act as a screen? Do you want to see a two-on-one finished with authority? Do you want to see not one, but two sweet breakaway goals? If you've said "yes" to any of these questions, then please watch this highlight video from NHL.com:
Adam Henrique Scored Two Breakaway Goals: Short analysis: You can't spell Henrique without 'EEEEEEE!'
Longer analysis: Henrique definitely has some wheels and Parise knew it tonight. The Jets defense was battered a bit, so it was a good risk to take to try and spring a guy into a space when possible. The first was a little dicey at first glance, what with some traffic in between Parise and Henrique. Thankfully, Parise avoided Dustin Byfuglien's stick-sweep and Henrique got enough on the puck to control it and blaze past Kenndal McArdle. The second breakway was the result of a much better read. Adam Larsson played a puck into Parise in the neutral zone, who saw Henrique out wide and behind Brett Festerling. Henrique received it perfectly and just charged past. Henrique really made the first one work, while the second one was higher quality play in my view. His quick decision making while going in was crucial in beating Pavelec on both.
Devils fans are likely very happy with Henrique now and with two breakaway goals, and why not? They weren't just great goals, they were important goals.
Not All That Glitters is Gold: Unfortunately, I'm struggling to find reason to think Henrique played a good game overall. He looked fine on the penalty kill, so there's that. However, he wasn't very good on offense; his two breakaways (and goals) were the only two shots he had on net. Henrique wasn't very good at the dot, as he went 5-for-15 on faceoffs this evening. Most of all, he was forced to play a lot of defense. Since he played 18:46 on a line that's intended to be offensive, that's not very good.
Let me take a step back for a moment. The Devils were at -4 in Corsi by the end of tonight's game, which makes sense since the Jets did have to come from behind and get more aggressive on offense to make it a game (which they did). Henrique stood out at -9 in Corsi. That's pretty awful, even on a team that was collectively -4 in even strength shooting attempts. Only his linemate David Clarkson was worse than Henrique at -12. That tells me that combination didn't work since Zach Parise curiously was only a -3. Making this worse is that no forward on the Jets stood out in Corsi in a similar fashion; so it's not like Henrique got picked apart on a particular match-up in lines. The defensive pairing of Mark Flood and Dustin Byfuglien did at +7 and +8, respectively. Not coincidentally, Clarkson and Henrique saw them more often than anyone else on Winnipeg tonight; which tells me that Henrique (and Clarkson) struggled with those two. I'm not sure why Peter DeBoer kept that going in retrospect.
I'm not dissing Henrique here; I'm very happy that Henrique scored on his two breakaways. I'm just saying that he didn't have a really good game as he really just had two glorious moments this evening.
The Offense Missed Ilya Kovalchuk Tonight: The Devils looked sluggish in just getting their offense going in the this game because of their puck movement into and through the neutral zone. Passes were off the mark or just strayed from their target. The Devils didn't get the benefit of some bounces; but there were stretches of time where the game was just in the Devils' half of the ice. Were Winnipeg sharper in their own attack and a little luckier, they could have made this a long night.
Basically, I felt the Devils really missed Ilya Kovalchuk's presence. Say what you want about his tendency to charge into the neutral zone only to stop above one of the circles and attempt a pass; but that would have been welcomed tonight. His speed and puck handling skills are at least respected by opponents. Tonight, the Jets had no worries about being aggressive in the neutral zone and tracking Devils; and it helped them out. While he wouldn't have necessarily changed the nature of the game, Kovalchuk could have opened up some space and helped the Devils along at least. This could have been quite useful in the third period.
David Clarkson probably would have had a better game because of it too. In Philadelphia, he was the shot machine on his line with Ryan Carter and Nick Palmieri. Tonight, he didn't mesh well with Parise or Henrique, he only managed to get two shots on net, and took a really lazy tripping penalty. I think he's better suited on a line when he can be the center of attention on offense.
The Inconsistency of Youth: Still, I would have rather had Clarkson up with Henrique and Parise instead of Mattias Tedenby. I am aware of his quickness and stickhandling skills, but the guy is just too inconsistent. Tonight was a perfect example of why. He would make a good pass and then follow it up later with a poor one, like a straight up giveaway. Tedenby forced more shots into Jets (2) than he had on net (1). I can't say much about his work in his own end because he was nondescript. He's still a young, developing player so inconsistency is the norm. But by no means does he deserve top six minutes at this juncture.
Speaking of young Swedish hockey players who play for New Jersey, defenseman Adam Larsson had a good game. He did make a few dumb errors, like attempting to clear the puck in the middle of the ice between two Jets. However, he showed a little more physicality tonight and made quite a few nice stops in his own end. The good outweighed the bad from the defender, Larsson played 24 minutes and even a little (33 seconds) PK time. I'll look forward to see if he starts to slowly get some time on the penalty kill. He only finished -1 in Corsi which is not bad considering the team was -4.
I Loved the Elias Line: Expect to see that more and more often as they keep having good games. The Devils' best line tonight was the line of Patrik Elias, Dainius Zubrus, and Petr Sykora. Elias scored the game's first goal in a play that began with one of his few faceoff wins (he went 5-for-20 tonight) and led to him finishing a two-on-one with Zubrus. It was a great goal. However, the main attacker on that line was Sykora with 6 shots on net. He kept getting into spaces to shoot, Elias and Zubrus found them, and so made Pavelec work to stop almost every one of them. On a night where the Devils only mustered 23 shots in regulation, Sykora's 6 was huge. Also: this line was the only one on the Devils where all three forwards finished positive in Corsi. That's further evidence of their effectiveness tonight.
The Non-Call: The refs' non-call of Blake Wheeler's hook on Anton Volchenkov was garbage.
That said, the Devils were pinned back in their own end on the play that led to Jim Slater's goal, which was closer to the real root cause for what happened. The Jets reacted faster to a puck that went sailing high into the air and after the hook on Volchenkov. Mark Fraser couldn't do much and it seemed that Brodeur was out to dry. Yes, the refs should have tagged Wheeler for hooking; but I didn't like how the Devils played on that shift.
The One Call: The refs were correct in tagging Evander Kane for a hook during a scramble in the Jets' slot. It was also the first full power play for the Devils this evening. The Devils' power play went right to work at the end of the game and at the beginning of overtime, and put up 4 shots on net and made a few other attempts. Throw in the abbreviated power play in the second period; and the Devils' PP put up 5 shots on net in 2:53. While they didn't score (and how sweet it would have been if they did in the third), it's superior to the Jets' power play that only put up 2 shots on net in 4:48.
A General Comment on the Defense: While I didn't like how the Devils struggled to get forward and how they had shifts where it seemed that getting a stop on defense would take forever, I can't complain about the defensive effort from the big picture. The PK was solid as ever (no goals, only 2 shots against) and the Devils did only allow 23 shots on net. That's considered to be good and I can't really complain.
A Rustless Brodeur: Martin Brodeur looked much better tonight, thanks in part to a defensive effort that didn't leave guys in white constantly open on his flank. On his own, he moved in the crease better and he wasn't really struggling to make saves. I felt he got hung out to dry on the Slater goal; and if he saw Mark Flood's shot (and I don't think so considering Mark Fraser's position on the ice), then it had to have been at the last possible moment. I wouldn't fault either goal on #30 alone. In any case, I think getting a game under his belt and some practice really helped him out and I think it showed tonight. I think he'll be fine going forward; though, I do dread the eventual "Is he done?" articles when he doesn't have a good night or isn't heroic or whatever.
So What's Johnny Oduya Doing Other Than Not Winning?: He saw the Ryan Carter, Tedenby, and Palmieri unit the most and suffered a bit. On a night where his team had to fight back, he wasn't really a part of it as he finished -5 in Corsi. That's not really good. I suppose there is a difference between playing with Paul Martin and not playing with him in Atlanta/Winnipeg.
Faceoffed: I mentioned it in two separate spots in this recap, but I might as well emphasize it here: the Devils got rocked on faceoffs. The most successful Devil on draws was Brad Mills and he only went 1-for-2. That's pretty sad. So is the fact that three Jets - Bryan Little, Alexander Burmistrov, and Jim Slater - racked up 70%+ faceoff winning percentages tonight. It didn't necessarily lead to much in terms of shots or possession; but it was amazing how the Jets kept winning all of these draws.
Big Buff Mistakes: On the one hand, Dustin Byfuglien had a good night. He was a +7 in Corsi, put up 3 shots on net, attempted 5 in all, and picked up 2 assists in 25:01 of work. That's not at all a bad line of results. On the other hand, the replay video shows Big Buff going after Parise in the neutral zone twice and failing as Parise passed it to Henrique each time to start a breakaway. Byfuglien took risks there and lost badly. Plus, he nearly scored on his own goaltender amid a scramble down low. What an odd night from Winnipeg's #33.
Cam Janssen Watch: 5:27 played, 1 shot on net, 1 missed shot on net, and no dirty stuff. I'm not sure how to feel about that.
Nords: If you've heard a whole bunch of noise four minutes into each period, then you've heard the Nordiques Nation. A few hundred Quebec Nordique fans visited the Rock this evening and that's apparently their "thing." It is to honor that it's been 16 years since their team moved to Colorado. Like at the season ending game in 2010-11, they were rather passionate and that added a bit to the atmosphere at the Rock. It was a bit odd to see and hear a group of people clad in Quebec blue chanting "Let's go Devils," but it's appreciated all the same. Anyway, they're going to some other games this season, one per month. I don't know their full schedule, but I believe they'll be hitting up Boston and Detroit among the other four teams.
Those are my thoughts on tonight's game. What are yours? Did you think the Devils missed Ilya Kovalchuk tonight? What would you have done differently in the third period to get more offense going? Do two breakaway goals make up for a whole game of being mostly passive? Are you surprised as I was that despite all of what the Devils did wrong, Winnipeg only got 23 shots on net? Please leave your answers and other thoughs on tonight's game in the comments. Thank you to everyone in the Gamethread for reading and commenting during the game, thanks to everyone who followed @InLouWeTrust during the game; and thank you for reading this recap.
48 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Whoa!
Steve Cangiolosi: HENRIQUE! SCARRRRSS!!! OOAAHHHHH!!! CAN YOU BELIEVE IT?
nice call by steve
Not sure, but I think the “CAN YOU BELIEVE IT?” was Chico. It’s really tough to tell. When these to get excited, they sound a lot alike.
Tired of Cangiolosi
A few times he confused Volchenkov and Fayne. Also, is it correct terminology to say “blocked away” when it was actually a blocker save by a goaltender? Anyway, I really miss Doc.
Another thing is that his style is too monotonous. He says “it wouldn’t go” when it’s not even a scoring chance.
and he’s still light-years ahead of the Philly play-by-play guys. I tired listening to the game on the way back from DC thursday night, and they were a good 15 seconds behind the action, called the game like I could see it on television, and just started screaming at every close shot, save, hit, pass, dump-in, etc. Aweful, I had to turn it off.
I’m not going to lie to you. It felt good and I’m going to do whatever is in my power possible to stay there as long as I can. - Petr Sykora on playing on a line with Elias and Parise.
in second period i often noticed 2 devils forechecking resulting in jets not making anything out of their possession and most of the time giving the puck right back to us. in 3rd and ESPECIALLY after the 1st jets goal devils stopped doing that. they started playing not to lose and gave up the 2nd goal because of it.
by Devils_from_Seattle on Nov 6, 2011 1:04 AM EDT reply actions
other than that …. i LOVE seeing devils win …. i was jumping around like a little girl that just got a pony after that OT goal.
by Devils_from_Seattle on Nov 6, 2011 1:16 AM EDT up reply actions
I don’t really get the negativity in this summary. Yeah, the Devils blew a 2 goal lead. They also only gave up 8 shots in the third while managing 8 of their own (yeah, 2 or 3 probably came after the tying goal, but no matter), which is pretty good. I’m almost sure C.J. is going to have good news regarding scoring chances. They’re also missing 4 key players.
So no, it wasn’t a dominant win, but expecting dominant wins with the squad NJ is icing seems a tad hopeful.
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
Isn’t it kinda of Johns style? Not getting too excited? That’s our job :)
by Devils_from_Seattle on Nov 6, 2011 1:52 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Yes, the Devils were missing important players; but so were the Jets. Their blueline has been battered and they also played without Nik Antropov. While I wasn’t expecting the Devils to do to Winnipeg what they did to Philadelphia, they were just so sloppy in their attempts to get the puck in the Jets’ end of the rink too many times. Even with key players missing, they shouldn’t be forcing passes right to Jets or throwing pucks away on dump-ins or icings because they missed their target. While I believe they really missed Kovalchuk on offense, the Devils surely can make two passes going forward without needing him active, right?
That contributed a lot as to why I did not think the Devils played a good game despite taking a 2-0 lead and winning it in OT. It also contributed quite a bit as to how the Jets got back in the game.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
Another night, another win, another blown call.
I am getting tired of the referees missing simple calls. How they allow Wheeler to blatantly hook Volchenkov is beyond me, forget that it led to a goal. That is a penalty in any location on the ice, and they allowed it to occur in the Devils’ defensive zone in front of Brodeur. The other night in Philadelphia they nabbed Larsson for barely grazing Wayne Simmons, and then Palmieri for being in the way of a Flyer he never saw coming. However, once overtime began they forgot to call clear interference calls on Philadelphia in which they impeded the progress of two Devils. All I want is consistency. Forget that the Devils have been incredibly unlucky with two recent goal reviews going against them(the skate kick off the stick, and the Briere stop/start), they need more help from the officials.
The team may have deserved the tying goal scored against them, but one player deserved a better fate. Martin Brodeur played excellent aside from the Flood goal. His movement was smooth and quick. His rebound control was vintage Brodeur. The rebounds he allowed fell at the sticks of defenders, his stick actively flicked the puck into the corner, and his pads kicked pucks out of the reach of opposing players. Martin needs to build on these victories. When his confidence is high and he is playing at the top of his game the Devils are a nightmare to play against.
It has become infuriating to see the deluge of missed calls or botched calls that NJ has had to fight through so far this season. It seems clear that the refs have no respect for NJ and so they turn a blind eye to things they should be calling.
This “the refs have it out for the Devils” stuff is getting old. I’m not singling you out, specifically, but it’s becoming a common refrain around here and it’s getting out of hand.
Yes, the refs missed an obvious restraining penalty on Volchenkov that led to the Jets second goal, but how quickly Devils fans forget that they also missed a pretty obvious slash by Parise on Henrique’s first goal that could have negated the play.
The pretty obvious slash by Parise happened after a pretty obvious slash by the Dman to stop Henrique…
And Kovalchuk speeds away, great moves, busting through, DID YOU SEE THAT?
I disagree, but regardless, how does that show a lack of respect for the Devils?
Occam’s Razor. Could it just be that referees, in general, suck and fans of teams see what they want to see?
The Devils once again sit last in penalties drawn. And yes, they missed a super obvious hook on Henrique on the first goal – I have no clue how the ref’s arm was not up there. The slash would’ve been a weak sauce call, which is why I am surprised it wasn’t made.
I don’t think there’s a conspiracy per se but the Devils have been last or near last in the league in penalties drawn for 20 years now.
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
I thought the hook on Henrique would have been pretty weak, too. If Parise’s slash had broken the guys stick, which was a distinct possibility, it would have been a no-brainer call. It didn’t, but it was still a pretty obvious slash.
One could say that there were two possible calls, one on each team, in which case the refs “let them play” which stands in stark contrast to any theory of the refs having it out for the Devils.
The funny part to me about this thought process is that it constantly mutates to suit the situation. Against the Flyers it was that the refs favored bigger market teams. Now, against the Jets, it’s just that they don’t like NJ.
Yes the team has been last or near last in penalties drawn but they’ve also been first or near first in penalties against. That it happens consistently suggests it’s more than mere chance.
no, i don’t think it’s chance at all. but i think refs like to call an even game, and so they will sometimes look the other way on other team’s penalties. i don’t think it has anything to do with markets.
that was a clear hook. you get the stick between the arm and the body and pull and that’s a penalty, has been since the lockout.
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
Maybe it is becoming common because the Refs do not call many penalties on Devils opponents night in and night out. One more game and one more game the Devils get the least amount of Power Plays.
What about the blatant stick hold on Zubrus in the offensive zone early in the game? So Your right they could have called slashing on Parise. You could point to missed calls all you want on either side. I’m sure I could find a bunch of missed
But the Jets still had more PP’s. It was only 3 to 2. But they still had more and the Devils are still last in the league.
Its the inconsistency that is the problem and Devils are always on the worst end. Your not going to see this talk go away until the trend stops.
Maybe it is becoming common because the Refs do not call many penalties on Devils opponents night in and night out.
Or, more likely, because it’s an easy scapegoat. The refs also do not call many penalties on the Devils night in and night out.
What about the blatant stick hold on Zubrus in the offensive zone early in the game?
What about the (insert missed penalty here) on (insert Jets player here) at (insert some point in the game here)?
So Your right they could have called slashing on Parise.
And yet no one is reviling the refs for missing that one.
You could point to missed calls all you want on either side. I’m sure I could find a bunch of missed…But the Jets still had more PP’s.
And this points to a conspiracy or “a lack of respect” for the Devils? It might be time to take off the tin-foil hat.
But they still had more and the Devils are still last in the league.
Indeed they are, as they usually are. And they’re also among the least penalized teams when all is said and done. Do you honestly believe they’re all, every single player on the team, so much cleaner than every other player and team in the League and that their consistently being called for less penalties is a function of that?
Its the inconsistency that is the problem and Devils are always on the worst end.
There is consistency. They consistently get less PP and less PKs. It balances out in the end.
Your not going to see this talk go away until the trend stops.
Or, hopefully, when someone shows it to be the silliness that it really is.
The refs also do not call many penalties on the Devils night in and night out.
So? If you look statistically those two stats do not significantly effect each other.
And this points to a conspiracy or "a lack of respect" for the Devils? It might be time to take off the tin-foil hat
Where did I say it was a conspiracy?
Do you honestly believe they’re all, every single player on the team, so much cleaner than every other player and team in the League and that their consistently being called for less penalties is a function of that?
No. But as a player you do have control over yourself. You don’t have control over what the other teams does. So considering the Defensive style the team and many players on the team have been use to playing. I think more times then not they are in a more favorable position to not have to resort to taking a penalty. Will see where they at the end of this year. Since they are playing a more aggressive style.
There is consistency. They consistently get less PP and less PKs. It balances out in the end.
Again these stats to not relate to one another.
So? If you look statistically those two stats do not significantly effect each other.
If it happens once, sure. If it happens twice, perhaps. If it happens every single year since the lockout (and possibly beyond), then you can’t say that.
Where did I say it was a conspiracy?
It’s implied. Why, then, did you bring up the disparity in penalties in a conversation that started with someone positing that the refs “don’t respect” the Devils except to attempt to prove the sentiment?
Again these stats to not relate to one another.
Possibly, but it’s an awfully big coincidence don’t you think?
If you look since the lockout. There is only one other teams PPOpp to TS stats that relate in such a matter. Every year. That is Boston. NJ and Boston are always ranking near the bottom of PPopp and at the top of TS. It changes every year for other teams it seems.
I do believe the refs try and even the calls out during a game. So I believe there is a percentage of those stats that will even each other out.
But why when you look at the entire season for all teams. They don’t?
I don’t know why these stats work out the why the do for the Devils. Maybe bad lighting. Maybe its some reputation thing. The Devils have a reputation of playing close games so they call them close.
If on average all the other teams in the league take more penalties. Why would our PPO to TS be so similar? It is easy to see that every other team in the league takes more penalties then the Devils. Except when they are playing the Devils. Weird.
I have never felt that the Devils have gotten jipped when it comes to calls against them. Its always been the failure of a call to the other team.
It is easy to see that every other team in the league takes more penalties then the Devils. Except when they are playing the Devils. Weird.
Averages are just that, averages. Even penalty magnets like the Penguins and Flyers go games without taking a single penalty once in a while. They make up for it in a different game by taking 12 or whatever and maintaining their higher average.
It’s not weird, nor conspiratorial. It could be that teams make a focus of not taking penalties against the Devils. It could be, like you suggest, that refs allow reputations to influence the way they call (or don’t call, as the case may be) games—it would make some sense as we know that calls go the other way often enough where guys with bad reputations sometimes unfairly earn penalties—so maybe Devils players get reputational non-calls, leading the referees to also let the other teams slide a bit to keep it “even”.
Nords fans
Nordiquenation.com will give you all you need to know about the powder blue movement. Page is in French, predictably.
by MyDogsNameIsKovy on Nov 6, 2011 7:29 AM EST reply actions
It would be good for them if they get a team back there, but I don’t want it to be at the expense of the financially strapped devils.
"Its the letter D"
by Rory B. Bellows on Nov 6, 2011 11:27 AM EST up reply actions
your right about the 1st 10 minutes Devs seemed sluggish and weren’t doing much so maybe that had something to do w/Kovy not being there. After that though I thought the home team took charge and were oh so close to grabbing a strangle hold of this game. I thought the PK was a real key to the game as Devs snuffed it out w/ Bryce and A train being real strong along with all the forwards. Great to see Henrique get his career going in a big way and now its only a matter of time before Tedenby , Palmieri and Larsson start showing up on the scoresheet and the future looks very bright especially if the Captain gets resigned. He just continues to look better and better each night out.
This is why ref’s hate us
“he team made it all the way to the conference finals, but lost to the Boston Bruins in seven games. In that series, head coach Jim Schoenfeld verbally abused referee Don Koharski after the third game, screaming obscenities. During the exchange, Koharski slipped and fell against the wall. He immediately claimed that Schoenfeld had pushed him, but Schoenfeld retorted that Koharski had fallen down. As Koharski snapped that Schoenfeld was “gone,” Schoenfeld replied, “Good, ’cause you fell, you fat pig. Have another doughnut!” League disciplinarian Brian O’Neill ordered Schoenfeld to sit out game four. The Devils demanded a hearing, but O’Neill refused. Claiming their rights as well as Schoenfeld’s had been violated, the Devils appealed to New Jersey Superior Court judge James F. Madden—an unprecedented appeal to authority outside the league. Forty minutes before game time, Madden ordered the suspension overturned pending a formal league hearing. In his order, Madden pointed out that the NHL’s investigation consisted of two phone calls—one to Koharski and one to Schoenfeld—and criticized O’Neill for not reviewing the videotape. In protest, referee Dave Newell and linesmen Gord Broseker and Ray Scapinello refused to work the game. After more than an hour’s delay, three off-ice officials—Paul McInnis, Jim Sullivan and Vin Godleski—were tracked down to work the game. McInnis served as the referee, while Sullivan and Godleski worked the lines wearing yellow scrimmage sweaters. Notably, league president John Ziegler was away on personal business and could not be contacted, leaving Chicago Blackhawks owner Bill Wirtz, as chairman of the league’s board of governors, to give the order to play the game with backup officials.[
Ziegler conducted a hearing on May 10, and suspended Schoenfeld for game five and fined him $1,000; the Devils were fined $10,000. Schoenfeld later admitted he regretted his comments. Nonetheless, Devils fans and broadcasters claimed that the officials shortchanged them for several years afterward."
link to video of it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXpcb5aTnPk
You wrote that all yourself? You didn’t copy it and without linking to the original source? Moreover, do you really believe that the NHL officials are holding a grudge from something that happened in 1988?
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Nov 6, 2011 12:20 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Reminds me of Philadelphia/Pittsburg announcers
I have to admit, the calls aren’t always right, or caught, but I remember the one thing that infuriated me for the past 10 years about Philadelphia fans/announcers (especially the announcers) is that they’d consistently say the refs were missing calls and then gloat when calls went their way.
It’s part of the game.
On a related tangent: I’ve always respected Devils announcers for admitting when their team was responsible for the call. You just don’t see that everywhere
John – I know you had the Nords right above you – but you hear any of Diablos tonight?
I thought Larsson had a solid game (minus one bad breakout pass that was intercepted). He’s getting more physical – which is good. I didn’t like the 1st period – why? Becuase the only line that was moving the puck forwards was the 4th line (and not really generating shots). I’m with you – I love the 2nd Line. And I thought thr 3rd line played well at times. I’m comfortable with these lines (Kovy in RW, Clarkson takes Palmieri’s spot, and Palms as 4th line RW (No Janssen).
As Kovyislove commented in the GameThread – these lines when Zajac returns should make us happy:
Sykora-Elias-Zubrus Parise-Henrique-Clarkson, Kovalchuk-Zajac-Palmieri Tedenby Josefson-Zharkov
Maybe Tedenby with Kovy and Zajac; Then a Palmieri-Carter-Mills/Pelley/Janssen 4th line.
In Lou We Trust: SBN Blog of the New Jersey Devils
by Matthew Ventolo on Nov 6, 2011 12:59 PM EST reply actions
I heard/noticed the Diablos on a few occasions last night and I was all the way in section 3.
You guys did a solid job, but were definitely outnumbered by the Nordiques who also happened to be directly above me. The amount of passion they bring is hard to match, and I wouldn’t be surprised if the Henrique OT goal was the only moment from last night that came close to matching the sound of their cheer they do at the 15:00 (I think?) minute mark.
Thanks. We had our biggest turnout last night. We even get people who move into our section as the games goes on..which is great and the sections around us are starting to join in which is exactly what we are going for.
It was tough to compare to the NN. Who outnumbered us. They do there thing at the 16 minute mark. We do ours at the 3:30 mark (3 cups, 30 years). The Devils finally got a display going on the jumbotron during that time. I hope the arena catches on. We also started the Hen-rique chant when he was doing his interview.
In Lou We Trust: SBN Blog of the New Jersey Devils
by Matthew Ventolo on Nov 6, 2011 1:17 PM EST up reply actions
Wow I was wondering who started the Henrique chant because it seemed like the whole building was doing it. That was a great moment. I didn’t know about the 3:30 chant but I hope it catches on too because it’s definitely something all Devils fans should be proud of.
Overall you guys did an awesome job and I really am hoping for continued success as the season goes on, I know I’ll be joining you for at least a few games at some point.
I did hear the Diablos at points, including at 3:30.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Nov 6, 2011 1:25 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Clarkson has excelled in the third line role aside Mattias Tedenby, and I do not see any reason to place him on a line with Parise and Henrique. Aside from the one breakaway goal, this line had little to no chemistry. I am willing to give them another game, but Clarkson should be moved back to the third line where he will not face top defensive pairings. He has a better chance of winning loose puck battles, extending the play, and producing higher quality shots on goal.
Obviously things will change before Zajac comes back. However, if he were coming back tomorrow I would utilize him in one of three ways:
Parise-Zajac-Kovalchuk
Kovalchuk-Zajac-Palmieri
Tedenby-Zajac-Kovalchuk(If the Clarkson-Tedenby combination begins to produce nothing)
As far as I am concerned, the team could look excellent like this when Zajac returns(assuming Josefson is still hurt):
Parise-Zajac-Kovalchuk
Sykora-Elias-Zubrus
Tedenby-Henrique-Clarkson
(Insert any of the 5 players we have that could fill this role)-Carter-Palmieri
by DiffuseTheBob on Nov 6, 2011 7:13 PM EST up reply actions
I saw enough of Parise-Zajac-Kovalchuk last season that I see no need to reprise the experiment.
Moreover, my opinion is that Parise and Kovalchuk should be on separate lines — I don’t view their styles of play as complementary, and therefore each should be placed with players who will make them look together, rather than hoping raw talent wins out. Kovalchuk needs someone who will carry the puck and dish it to him in particular spots (e.g. Patrik Elias), while Parise needs someone who will help him with the cycling game (e.g. Travis Zajac).
If Elias and Kovalchuk were going to play on the same line I believe it would have happened by now.
by DiffuseTheBob on Nov 6, 2011 10:17 PM EST up reply actions
If Sykora-Elias-Zubrus keep playing like they do – nothing is separating them.
In Lou We Trust: SBN Blog of the New Jersey Devils
by Matthew Ventolo on Nov 6, 2011 10:29 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t like the continuing trend of play Parise 25 minutes a night. He’s not a player that should play that many minutes a night. Kovalchuk already got injured, perhaps due to extensive minutes, we don’t need another injury.
I don’t know, man, Parise’s being used in all situations, so playing 21-23 minutes really shouldn’t come as a surprise. Especially with how the Devils have played more than 60 minutes several times this season.
For what it’s worth, he’s only played more than 30 shifts four times this season: the last two games, the shootout loss to San Jose, and the win over Carolina, which was the only one of those four games that didn’t go beyond regulation.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
The non-call was extremely infuriating at the time. These things tend to even out over time though and the refs might miss a big call against a Devil in the next: 3 days / 3 weeks / 3 months.
Also, I personally thought Zubrus had a really good game tonight, doing some good board work to keep the Devils in the zone on numerous occasions.
Wins: 6
Points: 13
Games Played: 12
Games Remaining: 70
% of Season Done 14.6%
Max Points: 152
At Pace To (Points): 89
Wins/Games: 0.50
At Pace to (Wins): 41
by Devils_from_Seattle on Nov 6, 2011 4:43 PM EST reply actions

by 






















