New Jersey Devils Edge Carolina Hurricanes 3-2
The last time the New Jersey Devils won a home game in regulation this season was on October 10, when the Devils beat the Carolina Hurricanes 4-2. The Devils nearly achieved the same result, but couldn't get the empty net goal to boost the score. All the same, it's a third straight win for New Jersey and they didn't hand their conference opponent any points. Well done and all that.
The score would suggest it was a close game but I don't think it really was all that close. The Devils had a solid outing on their own. In terms of shots, the Devils reigned over the Canes, putting up 36 to their 27. In terms of possession, it was all Devils with a +13 in team Corsi and +16 in team Fenwick at even strength. The Devils were the better team during the run of play tonight. Yet, the Devils needed a deflection, Cam Ward not getting his shoulder high enough on a shot, and a fortunate bounce off a wrap around attempt to get their goals. It wasn't like the Devils just torched Ward, they just had to have a good amount luck to get what they got this evening.
Aptly, the Devils were fortunate to get those pucks past Ward at all. The Devils didn't get on the scoreboard until mid-way through the second, and when they did, it was to tie the game at 1-1. The Canes, Brandon Sutter in particular, struck first on a shorthanded 2-on-1 that just about disgusted every Devils fan around the world who saw it. While the Devils pulled ahead early in the third period, the Canes equalized when Joni Pitkanen attempted a pass to the top of the crease, only for it re-direct off Adam Henrique's stick and behind Martin Brodeur. Mind you, the Canes had a few other, more glorious opportunities to score, but Martin Brodeur and some desperate defending absolutely denied them.
Henrique may have been the fall guy on the Canes' second goal, but he redeemed his bad fortunate as he drove hard to the net in the Canes' end late in the third. He saw Zubrus (it was during a line change) battle along the boards with the puck, and got possession as he came to help out. He whisked around the net and he jammed it on that near post with so much force, such that the puck had to pop up off Ward's left pad. Of course, it dropped in with authority, causing the denizens at the Rock to chant his name yet again. And why not? Henrique was once again the hero of the evening, having scored a breakaway game winner in overtime on Saturday. I wouldn't call this goal an act of redemption - he was just at the wrong place, wrong time on the Canes' second goal. I would call it an act of effort with luck in his favor, or even luck balancing out. After all, some bad luck led to Pitkanen's goal, and some good luck led to his winning the game.
I could say the same on the other two Devils' goals. Dainius Zubrus was denied by the post on a one-on-one with Ward in the first period. Yet, he did score as he got enough of the puck on Anton Volchenkov's shot to deflect it in. He also had his stick low enough as the incredibly lengthy goal review found no evidence to overturn his deflection. (Thanks, Toronto. Ditto the sarcastic thanks to the Rock for not showing a replay of that goal during the review.) Petr Sykora was absolutely unlucky as he hit the crossbar and the post on a one-timer during a power play in the second period. It was one heck of a shot that sadly wasn't counted since shots off the post aren't considered shots. He not only got a lane to shoot off an offensive zone faceoff win; but he caught Ward off enough such that his shoulder wouldn't be able to stop the shot. Their goals were good and with fortune favoring each after they were denied on earlier chances.
Luck is not a dirty word. Luck is not a cop-out. The Devils certainly did a good job against the Canes, they worked hard to get the opportunities they did get. Still, they wouldn't have scored any of their three goals without something out of their control going their way on three of those opportunities. That's how they got a victory in regulation, and so we should be fine with that. After all, we curse the team's lack of luck when they do everything right but score; we should appreciate it after this game.
I have a few more thoughts on tonight's game after the jump. For the opposition's take, please check out Bob Wage's recap of the game over at Canes Country.
The Stats: The NHL.com Game Summary | The NHL.com Event Summary | The NHL.com Play by Play Log | The NHL.com Shot Summary | The Time on Ice Shift Charts | The Time on Ice Head to Head Ice Time Charts | The Time on Ice Corsi Charts
The Highlights: Did you miss tonight's game? Perhaps you want to see the game's most pivotal moments? Then check out this highlight video from NHL.com:
;
But He's So Old How Can He Do Anything Right?: Tonight's three stars, as named by the attending media, were Adam Henrique, Patrik Elias, and Petr Sykora in that order. That's not bad. Henrique did score the game winning goal, so it's no surprise he's first. Elias had 2 assists, actually went over 50% on faceoffs (10-for-18), and had generally won his usual match up against the Eric Staal line. He did have that awful spill that led to Sutter's shorthanded goal, but the press felt he got beyond that and there's reason to agree there. Sykora scored the Devils' second goal, one of his six shots on net - seven if you want to count his double-post shot in the second period. Those are all defensible picks.
Too bad there isn't a fourth star because Martin Brodeur deserved some respect tonight. Brodeur may have only faced 27 shots on net, but he bailed out the Devils several times this evening. His stop on Eric Staal, Carolina's first shot on net of the game, was dicey, but he kept it out. From then on, Brodeur played like, well, himself. He moved well from post to post. He was strong with his stick, both behind the net and in the net - namely, when he pokechecked the puck away from a spinning Jeff Skinner. He was flashing the glove as he is wont to do. When people talk about Brodeur as "Marty," this is the kind of performance they're implying. A solid outing that makes you revere the guy just by a shortened friendly form of his first name.
In my opinion, Brodeur's biggest save was how he absolutely robbed Chad LaRose in the second period. Adam Larsson made a heinous giveaway into the neutral zone to Sutter, Sutter and LaRose went in on a two-on-one, and Brodeur just sprawled out with pace to deny LaRose what should have been Carolina's second goal. That wouldn't be the only big save he made, but anyone who believes Brodeur's washed up, losing it, or is just too old should be forced watch that save over and over and over. Brodeur, I thought, was great and important in tonight's victory.
E-Unit Concrete: That's a pretty terrible nickname for the line of Patrik Elias, Dainius Zubrus, and Petr Sykora. They deserve a better one because they continue to play well. Per the Time on Ice Head to Head Ice Time Charts, they saw Eric Staal, Chad LaRose, and Jeff Skinner the most this evening. That's Carolina's top line. While those three Canes combined for 9 shots at even strength and those three only combined for 6 at evens, the Elias line were attempting more shots. The play tended to be at the Devils' end of the rink more often than not since by Corsi, Elias was a +9, Zubrus was a +8, and Sykora was a +7. Forcing the other team's best forwards to defend more than they attack is always a good sign. It speaks to how well the line is playing and how shrewd Peter DeBoer was to set and stick with that match-up.
Oh, and the Elias line got 2 goals this evening too. It goes without saying that's huge.
Improvement at the Top: The unit of Zach Parise, Henrique, and David Clarkson had a better outing tonight than they did on Saturday. Clarkson was definitely more involved in the play this evening as he put up 6 shots on net and drew a hooking call on Tlusty. Henrique stands out for scoring another important goal, though I won't forget how he rushed through a few Canes to create a shot for himself on a few shifts, which he unfortunately put way wide. Aside from that moment, Henrique was great on faceoffs and had a better defensive night. Parise definitely made his presence felt down low and thereabouts, but mostly on the power play. At even strength, he only had 1 shot on net. In terms of Corsi, the three finished just above zero. That's another improvement from Saturday night, where Henrique and Clarkson drowned in their match-ups. They were protected a bit since they saw Patrick Dwyer, Jiri Tlusty, and Sutter the most in terms of Canes forwards. Then again, they did see plenty of their top defensive pairing in Joni Pitkanen and Tim Gleason - so Paul Maurice had some idea on what to do about the Devils' top two lines. I still think the line would be better off with Ilya Kovalchuk, but I do have to credit this group with an improved effort.
A Disappointment: If there's one player that was disappointing on the Devils, then it was Mattias Tedenby. He didn't play too much, only 11 shifts for 9:37 of ice time. Tedenby did get a good chunk of power play time and he wasn't empty on the score sheet with 2 shots on net. He even drew the hooking call on Jay Harrison. Yet, the guy wasn't in sync this evening and he struggled to make good passes. For a few shifts against the line of Alexei Ponikarovsky, Zach Boychuk, and Tuomo Ruutu, he was just lost and pinned back (Tedenby finished a -1 in Corsi). I noticed late in the game that he wasn't taking regular shifts with Ryan Carter and Nick Palmieri, who each had more energetic and somewhat productive games. (Aside: Palmieri had 3 shots on net, 3 misses - including one big one. The difference here is that he did more than just miss an opportunity. He's fitting in with Ryan Carter.) That's not a good sign for him, but I can't say he did much to convince the coaches otherwise.
I know he's got a lot of talent, but he's got to start putting it together a little more often if he wants to be playing more minutes at this level.
The Constant Disappointment that is the New Jersey Devils Power Play: The Devils had three 5-on-4 situations that lasted 7:14 and a short 5-on-3 situation for 23 seconds. They did not score on any of their opportunities, though Sykora came incredibly close by hitting both a cross-bar and a post on a shot. The Devils did get 8 shots on net, which is usually a good thing to see from the Devils' power play. It means they were able to get set-up multiple times, maintain possession, and get enough good looks on net to force Ward to make some stops. Given that 4 of those 8 came from Parise, the Devils really got in close on some of these chances.
Yet, I can't really praise the power play because of the awful, awful, awful shorthanded goal they allowed. The Devils win a faceoff and Elias, the team's top performing forward, falls down. He just fell down. Nobody was near him, nobody yelled anything at him that would throw him off, and there was no visible force that could have caused him to fall. He just had Clarkson's equilibrium for a moment. Sutter immediately torched him and went off to the races. Perhaps Brodeur should have had that shot, but had Elias been able to stay on his two skates, the whole play doesn't happen. That's how the Devils started their first power play, and it wasn't even the only shorthanded situation. They allowed two more later in the game, which Brodeur did bail them out on. When the other team gets the best scoring chance on your power play, I'm sorry, but I can't really say too many good things about the PP.
Special Teams Silver Lining (a.k.a. The PK): At least the penalty kill remained perfect and fairly solid with only 4 shots allowed over 4 minutes. Cheers for the PK units (and jeers again to the PP units that had more ice time and nearly allowed as many shots against). They really should have only had to have killed one penalty. The Devils got dumb during a line change and got caught with six skaters on the ice near the end of the second period. That kind of penalty is always a poor one to take; thankfully, the penalty killers made sure it didn't burn them this evening.
The Greene Return: Andy Greene returned to the lineup after sitting out the past couple of games. He looked fine in his return. DeBoer tried to protect him a bit by not giving him a 20+ minute workload right away. While he was paired with Adam Larsson, Greene played 16:48 with very little PK time and none on the power play. Given how Elias was a pointman to not a lot of PP success, maybe he should have been, but whatever. Greene also didn't get the toughest matchups, he usually saw the Canes' secondary scorers more often than not. He did OK as evidenced by finishing +1 in Corsi and keeping up in his own end - even when the situation got a bit dicey (see: Larsson's awful giveaway into the neutrall zone). I'm sure Greene will get more minutes after good showing this evening.
The Fayne-Tallinder Section: Greene's return did not affect the status of either Mark Fayne and Henrik Tallinder. DeBoer kept them together and gave them the tough job - regular shifts against Staal's line. They sparkled. They weren't perfect. I still recall Fayne getting beat on a Skinner spin-move that Brodeur bailed him out of, and Tallinder took a tripping call he could have avoided. They had a few errors. But they more than made up for it with their play on the point and in their own end. Fayne attempted 4 shots and got 2 on net. Tallinder attempted 6 and got 2 on net. Given how the Devils' defenders aren't exactly all that offensive, that's quite good on offense. Most importantly, they were dominant in Corsi. Fayne and Tallinder were each +18 this evening. That's superior to any of the three forwards they regularly played behind tonight, which speaks to how well they did. Since they saw the Staal line most of all, it's rather impressive.
Goal (Mostly) Achieved: I will say the Devils got off to a slow start, as the Canes put up 4 shots in quick succession and generated the first dangerous scoring chance of the night. The passing through the neutral zone reminded me of Saturday's game against Winnipeg, where that was problem all night for them. That was not good.
Fortunately, the Devils got sharper in their puck movement. I would say the Devils really got going until about 6-7 minutes into the game. Their passes hit their targets more often and not coincidentally, they started putting up more and more shots on Ward. This continued through the second and third period, which was reassuring in my eyes. It helped the Devils put enough pressure on the Canes' defense to keep getting chances to score. It definitely helped the Devils keep the Canes honest late in the game. When a team is able to get forward with just a few passes into and through the neutral zone, then they're going to have offensive success. The 36 shots the Devils put on Ward are indicative of how successful it can be.
Faceoff Winners: Whereas the Devils got creamed at the dot against Winnipeg, they were the creamers tonight. As a team, the Devils won 38 out of 56 faceoffs, which is quite good. Elias had a good night, but Zubrus was even better as he went 7-for-8. Needless to say, Big Z should be taking all of the draws when Elias is thrown out of them. But, wait, there's more. Henrique was beastly at the dot by going 7-for-9. Carter wasn't too bad in going 5-for-9. Brad Mills only played 8:09 tonight, but even he was perfect in going 5-for-5 on draws. Even Clarkson, yes David Clarkson, went 3-for-6 on draws. This was a nice little turnaround from Saturday. Not to mention that one of Elias' faceoff wins created Sykora's goal.
A Little Thing that Teams Do to Win Games: I call it a little thing, but I certainly noticed it at the end. With about 41 seconds left, the Canes iced the puck and so the Devils had an offensive zone faceoff. Ward had to go back into net in case the Devils won the draw. Henrique did so, the Devils put the puck into the end boards, and the line started forechecking when the Canes recovered. They got Pitkanen skating about with the puck behind the net and ultimately the Canes were forced to toss it away for another icing call. The Devils didn't win the puck and get a shot on net, but they forced the Canes to stick with 5 skaters, they burned 16 seconds off the clock, and got another offensive zone draw.
The Devils nearly did it again as they won the draw and put that puck into the corner. but Pitkanen escaped Zubrus and was able to get it up ice for one last chance with 10 seconds left. As indicated by the score, it didn't result in anything (shot deflected over the glass, another draw, the Devils won it and cleared it). But I was impressed by the effort that saw the Devils force the Canes to give up possession and waste time to hold onto a lead. It's the sort of thing that I believe good teams do to win games in situations like these. It speaks well of the players' awareness and the coaching staff to instill them with this kind of mentality. That's a good thing to see going forward, especially in a close game on the scoreboard (though not on ice, as indicated by shots, Corsi, etc.).
Those are my thoughts on tonight's game, now I want read yours. Who do you think had a good night for the Devils? Who do you think had a bad night for the Devils? What did you think of Greene's return? Do you think the Devils put on a solid performance over Carolina or did you think the performance of the two teams was close like the score? What would you do with the power play, given that it's hit a low of sorts? Other than the power play, what would you like to see the Devils change for Friday's game against the Caps? Please leave all of your thoughts and other comments the Devils' win in the comments. Thank you to everyone in the gamethread for reading and commenting; thanks to everyone who followed @InLouWeTrust for a part of the game (Thanks, phone battery); and thank you for reading this recap.
39 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Had a chance to go over to the supporters section tonight, and I can’t say enough how amazing these guys were. Me and a few friends hopped into some empty seats during the start of the second period and stayed almost until the third.
Everyone in this section exemplifies what I hope for in future atmospheres at Devils games. Not only do they continuously yell out cheer after cheer, they also make it a point to stand throughout the entire game. I didn’t get a chance to talk to any of them but I can’t say enough how impressed I was with their attitude and I will definitely be getting tickets in section 122 for some future games.
Over at Fire and Ice a lot of nonsense has been spread about the “Henrique” chant and Gulitti has even mentioned that a number of Devils fans have told him the reasoning behind this chant is to mock the Rangers’ “Henrik” cheer. I’d love to hear again from Matt V, but from what I’ve heard previously it was the supporters section who originated this chant last game and I’m sure they were the ones who got it started up throughout the entire arena again tonight. I’d be very, very, very surprised if it was designed to make fun of the Rangers chant, but again I have no idea and won’t know until some of the Diablos weigh in. I never once thought about it being done to mock the Rangers, but I honestly don’t care either way because any type of chant is greatly appreciated especially in the moments like we’ve had in the past few games where an unlikely hero has emerged to get this team a W.
Overall I am just extremely grateful for the actions of the supporters section and hope that more fans get a chance to go check them out up-close in the future. They get really into it, and I even saw people in costumes of sorts like a white/red puffy wig and a customized Devils leather jacket. With the awful season last year and the constant allegations of bankruptcy looming over our heads, it’s safe to say that it’s a tough time to be a Devils fan. With that being said, the supporters section could not have come at a better time to give this team a much needed energy boost throughout games. I’m proud of them and was shocked to see how passionate and dedicated they were even for a Tuesday night game. They blew me away, I couldn’t have imagined how dull the atmosphere at the Rock might have been without them, and I sincerely hope fans continue to join in with their chants and show appreciation for the amazing efforts these guys are putting in to make sure that the Devils players hear us, and also that the league knows Jersey loves this team and would be devastated if they were ever taken away.
Thanks so much for the kind words. That is exact;y what we are aiming for. Thanks for coming by too – we had a to of people join us as the game went along. The more the merrier.
I heard what Gulitti said on twitter and he’s getting a lot of heat from it. You are right that Diablos started both Hen-rique chants and let me tell you: It has NOTHING to do with mocking the Rags. It’s his name. We’ve been chanting player last names after they score goals/make a good play/make a great save/etc… and his name happens to sound like a goalie (that hasn’t won anything in NHL) of a rival team. Pronounced different, spelled different; and we don’t really care. MSG chanted “Mar-ty” during Biron’s game last Friday – does the media notice that and say it’s the same chant a rival team uses for the most legendary goalie of this time? No. And they play the same position. It’s funny really…
Again – thanks for the positive feedback on the section. It’s getting more and more noticeable and larger in numbers becuase people like you and friends want that same atmosphere and move over as the game goes on. The fans in sections 121, 123, 120 are starting to understand what we chant and it’s just a matter of time before that half of the arena gets into it.
In Lou We Trust: SBN Blog of the New Jersey Devils
by Matthew Ventolo on Nov 9, 2011 9:08 AM EST up reply actions
Thanks for clearing that up. TG posted on his blog that he based his “mocking the Rangers” statement off of what Wyshynski had earlier tweeted, along with multiple Devils fans also claiming it was the reason. I’m fine with that because TG even copy/pasted Wyshynski’s earlier tweet and he did make mention of it, but the only thing I’m curious about is why TG felt the need to phrase it that way when he didn’t know it was 100% accurate. I don’t think Wysh goes to the games, but TG had to have known it was a supporters section thing and I don’t understand why he’d take a slight at that group for something so minuscule. Wyshynski was clearly wrong for thinking it was a Rangers chant, and so too were all of the people on Twitter who probably weren’t even on the game but still messaged TG and claimed it was as well.
As journalists they should both probably now recognize that it was a mistake and correct it as they would in any other situation.
It has NOTHING to do with mocking the Rags. It’s his name.
TG thinks you’re a liar, he thinks you’re obsessed about the Rangers, you can’t do anything about it, it’s in your DNA.
"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"
by Elektrostal_Kid on Nov 9, 2011 10:03 AM EST up reply actions
Oh yah, also forgot to mention that I enjoyed the “goal” “goal” “goal” chant we had going during the zubrus goal review. It was funny because it seemed like the longest review ever and we had to keep stopping and restarting the chant until they finally confirmed it and the place just erupted from all the suspense.
by NJallDay on Nov 9, 2011 11:00 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
What did you think of the a new chant being introduced:
“Dev-ils….Score A Goal….Odie-odie-odie-odei-ooooooooooo”
In Lou We Trust: SBN Blog of the New Jersey Devils
by Matthew Ventolo on Nov 9, 2011 12:01 PM EST up reply actions
No mockery. It’s just funny they play for rival teams and they HAPPEN to have similar sounding names. Oh yeah, and Henrique had to do something good to deserve the chant, so it was done in earnest.
by rtrstevec on Nov 9, 2011 11:06 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
It may not be directly aimed at the Rangers but it sure comes off that way. The first time I ever heard the idea of the HEN-RIQUE chant it was in reference to him scoring a goal on Lundqvist. It’s not like it’s the first time the fans have chanted something stupid that’s directed at the Rangers in an unrelated game. After a goal some add “Rangers suck Flyers swallow” in the goal song! And how can anyone take the chant at face value with the whistling/Rangers suck history?
These are not your intentions but that’s what other people hear. Why not chant A-dam Hen-rique in the Zach Pa-ris-e cadence?
by crashlanding on Nov 9, 2011 12:14 PM EST up reply actions
Why not chant Mar-tin Bro-deur in the Zach Parise cadence?
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
So Devils fans have to change the way they root for players and their team becuase of something Rangers fans do?
No, I’m sorry. I’m not comfortable with that. People should chant what they want (as long as it’s positive – which is a unwritten rule in Diablos). If people/media perceive something the wrong way – it’s up to others to correct them and maybe they should do a little more research. Devils fans used to chant “Mar-tin” (Marrr-taaan) in the 90s…it changed to “Mar-ty” over the years. Then, Rag fans get to use Hen-rik. But that’s okay? No one goes nuts about that. Rag fans get to chant Mar-ty for Martin Biron – do you see Devils fans getting all crazy about it? No. And you know what – devils fans shouldn’t
Two different teams, two different fan bases, two different chants. I don’t care what Rag fans chant. It’s about supporting our team. But don’t tell me or others what we can and can not chant just becuase some one else does it (not saying you are – but some out there are). That’s how a lot of people feel. We did it to support a rookie who did something that only Patrik Elias has done – and that’s special.
Hen-rique!
In Lou We Trust: SBN Blog of the New Jersey Devils
by Matthew Ventolo on Nov 9, 2011 12:27 PM EST up reply actions
I think we should chant Ad-am Hen-rique.
After all, we can’t just chant Ad-am because we also have Adam Larsson, and you don’t want to get his first name confused with Craig Adams either, or any of the other Adam’s in the league, or my middle name.
I mean, I’d be confused as to why everyone was chanting for my middle name during a Devils game. That’s just weird, ya bunch of creepers…
by Marty 4 Prez on Nov 9, 2011 12:34 PM EST up reply actions
It’s more than that too, as I see that TG is continuing to troll on twitter – when’s the last time the Devils have had a rookie play this well in big spots? It’s not like these Henrique chants are coming when he’s scoring a goal to make it 5-2 instead 5-1.
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
Exactly. For the same reason Rangers fans can chant Mar-ty for Biron, we can chant Hen-rique. It would be extra sweet to do it after a Henrique-on-Henrik goal, though.
by rtrstevec on Nov 9, 2011 12:42 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
The “Mar-ty” chant seemed to evolve from the “Marty’s better chant” which emerged from the 2000 Devils-Stars Cup final, in which the fans were mocking Eddie Belfour. The “Eddie’s better” chant originated during the Stars-Avs series in 1999 and once again in 2000, as a way to mock Patrick Roy.
It would be nice to see the “Mar-tin” chant brought back, as it is unique, easier to hear, and more distinct than “Mar-ty”.
by DiffuseTheBob on Nov 10, 2011 12:27 AM EST up reply actions
Next time you stop by find one of us captains. it would be nice to see who is coming into the section, from where, and why. I’m probably the easiest one to spot. 6’7’’ brodeur jersey and I lead a good amount of the chants. but you can show up in the section and ask for any of the captains and people will point us out.
As Matt said the last thing on our minds when starting the chant was anything about any other team. Our only thought was that our team was now winning and it was thanks to Henrique. The claims that we rip of rangers fans will constantly happen for whatever reason, because they think they are the be all end all of the NHL. We could careless about any other team. Our goal as the official supporter section of the Devils is to support our team. We don’t try to find ways to mock the other teams or mock other fans. We just do what we feel is the right way to get energy into the prudential center and motivate the players.
I’ve been amazed by how well we have done this year. If you listen to broadcasts from a year ago to now you can actually hear that there are fans attending games. It’s already a completely different atmosphere.
It’s unfortunate that a lot of times the chants still aren’t spreading. People are so used to sitting there and just watching the game, but it’s finally starting to change.
Anyway, make sure you follow our facebook(Diablos 122(Official)) and twitter (@Diablos122) if you have them. The facebook is the best way to reach us. If anyone posts here Matt usually relays the messages if he doesn’t answer them himself.
Hope to see you in the section again soon!
Sorry, I have to nit pick, pet peeve of mine, but it’s quite appropriate because we all know what you meant, but take something out of context and you look bad.. It’s “couldn’t care less”. If you could care less, it means you care at least a little bit.
As I said in the Henrique-Henrik post, Rangers fans need to get over themselves.
Go Devils
Go Jets
Adam's World! Adam's World! Party Time! Excellent! Boodaloodooboodaloodooboodaloodoo

I think it’s about time this picture is whipped out again!
Also, this game really demonstrated just how important face-offs are. Not just the Sykora goal. The Devils won key faceoffs that forced Carolina to play in their own end, lose possession in the Devils’ zone, etc.
Faceoffs were a huge part of this game.
Nobody's gonna touch that?!? (you get a virtual box of cookies if you get the reference I just made)
Not the Wayne’s World reference. That one’s too easy. I mean the reference in the title line of this post.
But seriously, Henrique deserves a boodaloodooboodaloodooboodaloodoo from all of you.
You have angered the might Henrique. The Henrique shall smite you like…uh..ehem.
Anyway, Dungeon-us Crab. Get it? Because we’re in a dungeon? (another reference, same show. I know one person on here who will get it….)
by Dr. Witticism on Nov 9, 2011 1:24 PM EST up reply actions
Awesome
Because this place is just lousy with them.
by NewarkCupParade on Nov 9, 2011 2:36 PM EST up reply actions
That chick is like the Pele of ******
“Well, we obviously don’t want you to…” “Violate the first law of robotics?!?”
It’s like…Meowschwitz in there.
Seriously, best show on television. By far the funniest show I have ever seen in my life (and I am a hell of a tough critic when it comes to film and television).
by Dr. Witticism on Nov 9, 2011 4:50 PM EST up reply actions
I really don’t understand why luck has much to do with this game. NJ outplayed Carolina and should’ve won the game a majority of the time. It’s not like the goals went in off someone’s back or something.
Also, shorthanded chances will usually be better quality than power play chances for reasons that should be obvious. NJ’s power play generated a lot, just couldn’t get one by.
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
I agree. I would actually argue that the luck factor was in favor of Carolina. Elias fell down, gifting Carolina a 3 on 2, which led to their first goal. Henrique put a perfect deflection past Brodeur for the second Carolina goal. Sykora hit a crossbar and a post with a near perfect shot that beat Ward cleanly.
Plus, the Devils outshot the Hurricanes, out possessed them, and out played them. Carolina was lucky to lose by 1.
by DiffuseTheBob on Nov 9, 2011 4:27 AM EST up reply actions
I also don't understand all this talk of "luck"
Zubrus’ goal was a perfect tip. The shot was shot toward the net, as intended; he was in front of the net, as intended; and he tipped the puck, as intended.
Sykora’s goal resulted from him getting the puck from a perfect faceoff win. Sykora was positioned at the top of the circle instead of the side, so he was the intended recipient. He intentionally shot the puck at the top right corner, and it was a good shot which beat Ward.
Henrique’s goal was the result of a huge amount of effort and, as you noted, a very forceful push into the side of the net.
Everything was done intentionally none of the plays were the result of something unintentional occurring.
By your logic in this article, every single goal is the result of good luck. I just don’t see it that way, and I don’t understand how others do. Perhaps you could elaborate? And I don’t mean that sarcastically; I am genuinely interested in why you view these goals as the results of “luck.”
by Dr. Witticism on Nov 9, 2011 7:11 AM EST up reply actions
I mean, I agree with John that chance is a large factor in just about every goal. I just don’t think that tonight’s the night that demonstrates that clearly, nor do I think that tonight’s result is necessarily a result of good fortune. And yeah, I don’t know why a fluke play like Elias falling down is worthy of scorn, but the chance factor on the NJ goals has to be pointed out.
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
It’s a fair criticism in that I left out a crucial part of why I wrote what I wrote before the jump. This game reminded me of the Dallas game and (definitely) the first LA game. OK, the Devils were arguably better this evening; but those two were games whereupon the Devils were the better team in their performance but didn’t get on the scoreboard enough to win in regulation (LA first game, Quick was bombarded like Ward was) or at all (the Dallas game). I had that on the mind as I wrote that; though, I should’ve, you know, wrote that so you all known where I was coming from. The Devils got the breaks to score enough to win last night, something they didn’t get in past games.
As far as the Elias fall, yeah, I was a bit harsh in retrospect.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Nov 9, 2011 1:34 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I see what you’re saying now. Though I would say the fact that they clearly had bad luck in Dallas doesn’t mean they needed heaps of good luck in Carolina. The game with Dallas was just chock full of bad luck. I thought this game was largely dependent on their superior play. Still, I definitely understand your point now, and it certainly seems more logical now that you’ve explained it.
by Dr. Witticism on Nov 9, 2011 2:11 PM EST up reply actions
I would like to add: it wasn’t that the Devils “couldn’t get the empty net goal,” but rather that they never got the chance. The repeatedly pinned back Carolina in their own end with their fantastic forecheck and, by the time Carolina was able to pull Cam Ward for even a small amount of time, there were nine seconds left and the faceoff was in the Devils’ zone.
So, if you think about it, the fact that they didn’t get the empty netter was a huge positive.
They couldn’t get the EN because everytime Ward got to the bench he had to skate back since Carolina iced it.
Sir, Our math shows that the bird is equal to or GREATER THEN the word. CHECK IT AGAIN!!!!
by statusquo on Nov 9, 2011 1:26 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Right. And they iced it because the Devils’ forecheck wouldn’t let them break out, leaving only the option of trying to get a home run pass down the ice…which usually results in a missed passed and, consequently, an icing.
by Dr. Witticism on Nov 9, 2011 1:33 AM EST up reply actions
What was with the 3-stars?
The only one who came out to salute the fans was Sykora. Anyone know why that was?
Maybe it was because of the 2 games I saw live when I said it ( PHI & SJS) or just knowing the recent history of Devil retreads but I was wrong to make quick harsh judgement on Sykora. His play along Elias and Zubes has been smart and effective and throw in the bonus of him getting his scoring touch and that line has been great. Has this line even played better since ZP moved off and Zubes has been on it; I don’t know the exact transition period but if its chemistry you want then this line has it.
Kudos to PDB for getting team on 3 game win streak as just when things looked like the sky was falling team has now responded positively again for 3rd time in his short reign. I hope his eyes have been open to the fact that this team can survive.heck even thrive w/o Kovy. I’m not going to say they’re better w/o him but he needs to be part of a team and not the whole team w/ the ridiculous minutes he was racking up. Hopefully PDB sees this fact and now with 2 top lines and a very competent 3rd line, thanks to the play of Ryan Carter, he can adjust minutes accordingly.
first game i missed this season. gamecenter live blackout because it was on Versus.
lesson learned , we have any more national televised games this year? (other then the 16 games+ of the postseason) :)
Wins: 7
Points: 15
Games Played: 13
Games Remaining: 69
% of Season Done 15.9%
Max Points: 151
At Pace To (Points): 95
Wins/Games: 0.54
At Pace to (Wins): 44
by Devils_from_Seattle on Nov 9, 2011 12:06 PM EST reply actions
bad bad geek, wrong formulas in few places
Wins: 7
Points: 15
Games Played: 13
Games Remaining: 69
% of Season Done 15.9%
Max Points: 153
At Pace To (Points): 95
Wins/Games: 0.54
At Pace to (Wins): 44
by Devils_from_Seattle on Nov 9, 2011 1:05 PM EST up reply actions
I have pretty high expectations that we’ll meet this pace. The next four games will be a huge test and it’s paramount that we come out of this weekend with at least 2 out of 4 points from Washington. Anything less will kill the momentum that this winning streak has produced.
The concern is whether or not 95 points will make the playoffs. I think we’re seeing more games going to OT and resulting in 3 point decisions. If you extrapolate out the Eastern conference based on this math, you’ll see that at 95 points the Devils will just get in the 8th seed (and face-off with top-seeded Pittsburgh).
Come Say Hello! Section 231 - Row 2 - Seat 20
Great entertaining game
I got to to the opening chant of the game. It was a blast!
Henrique is looking very solid, to say the least. The forecheck was good last night.
I don't think a deflection is luck
That’s exactly what you are trying to do by deflecting the puck. That was a phenomenal play by Zubrus.
by J-Nasty on Nov 10, 2011 7:16 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Depends. What Zubrus did was, I’d say, more of a redirection than a deflection and was completely intentional, even if there might have been a little luck involved in getting the desired outcome. What Parise did against the Hurricanes the first time they met where he got around the defender and intentionally altered the path of the pass/shot was also an intentional redirection.
When guys shoot from the point into a mass of bodies near the net and someone just puts their stick into a lane and the puck takes a fortuitous bounce off of it is probably more luck than skill. And it goes the other way. The deflection off of Henrique’s stick on Carolina’s second goal was an unlucky deflection.
Splitting hairs, perhaps, but in my mind there’s a difference between a deflection and a redirection.

by 






















