Solid Effort by New Jersey Devils Earned 3-1 Win Over Buffalo Sabres
The word "solid" is a commonly used one in sports. It's basically, "good but not great." On a standard grading scale, it's a 'B' - not an amazing result, but nothing to be ashamed or unhappy about. With respect to sport, it's short for a team having made a few mistakes, but there can be no real complaints about the performance overall. In a single word, the New Jersey Devils were solid this evening. They earned their 3-1 win over the Buffalo Sabres. They didn't dominate them or crush them in any sense; they just worked hard and got a result. I repeat: they were solid.
I'm emphasizing that five-letter word because it's not really one I or anyone else could have appropriately assigned to the Devils over the last two months on most nights. The Devils have been miserable in third periods; giving up leads or getting games iced right before their eyes. Disaster strikes them during their power plays on a seemingly regular basis. Players go hot and cold to the team's detriment. The goaltender can't bail out So on and so forth.
Tonight, none of that didn't happen. The power play was actually effective and nearly converted. The Devils essentially rolled with three forward lines and they were each effective in their own way. The Sabres and/or Martin Brodeur bailed out the Devils when they had a breakdown in their own end. Most impressively, the Devils held onto a third period lead. They came close to scoring four goals, they didn't get them, and as it turned out, it didn't matter. That alone is reason enough to be pleased about this win.
Sure, there were moments where the Sabres nearly made it a game. I'm sure Sabres fans are wishing Toronto thought better of a goal taken away due to a high stick by Luke Adam. I'm sure Sabres fans wished they made the Devils pay for their penalties more than once. I'm sure Sabres fans wished they could build on that one power play goal Thomas Vanek did score. The Devils and perhaps some good bounces made it difficult as possible for Buffalo to get back into the game and their efforts were rewarded with a lead made safe. That's solid hockey and that's something to smile about if you're a Devils supporter.
As usual, I have more thoughts about tonight's game after the jump. Please check out Die by the Blade for any Buffalo coverage.
The Stats: The NHL.com Game Summary | The NHL.com Event Summary | The NHL.com Play by Play Summary | The NHL.com Shot Summary | The Time on Ice Shift Charts | The Time on Ice Head to Head Ice Time Charts | The Time on Ice Corsi Charts
The Highlights: This NHL.com highlight video showcases all four goals as well as some nice saves.
Sykora's Brace: When a player scores three goals, then he has achieved a hat trick. Petr Sykora came very close with scoring two goals as well as getting robbed or missing the net on a few other situations. Scoring 2 goals in a game is a good feat too; in soccer, they call it a brace. For lack of a better term, I'm using it here. Clearly, Sykora's goals were important and evidenced of his good night which consisted of 3 shots on net (2 in the net), and 2 misses.
The first goal he scored was an accident. Ryan Miller just completely misplayed Sykora's shot. Miller got a piece of it, not all of it, and as he scrambled back with his stick, he thought he could stop it in time. He didn't and so Sykora's first goal was really the result of a goaltender error rather than on a great shot. A goal's a goal, so I'm not complaining. Besides, Sykora's second goal was on a great shot. Dainius Zubrus worked down low to help get a puck go free for Patrik Elias to get it behind the net. Elias sees his old friend driving to the slot and hits him with a simple pass. Sykora hammered the puck past Miller's right side and it's 2-0 early in the second period. A beautiful goal, something Miller won't be wishing he had back - he had no real chance at it. That second goal held up, so it turned out to be the game winner.
While Sykora did come close a few times to get that third goal, it wasn't all glitter and gold for him tonight. The Elias line got wrecked in possession. Sykora was a -5 in Corsi, far better than Zubrus (-9) or Elias (-10). In their defense, they did see a lot of Buffalo's top line: Jason Pominville, Vanek, and Jochen Hecht. That's not just a unit that features Buffalo's top two scorers but top scorers in the entire NHL. That's not an easy match-up, and given that the Devils were winning for a majority of this game, maybe it's to be somewhat expected. I suppose you could say that Sykora being better than his linemates in Corsi is a further sign of his good night. I only bring it up to show that he wasn't necessarily dominating every time he was on the ice. Still, great goals and good effort overall.
Seven-Ten: With Sykora's two goals, the Devils now have 7 forwards in double-digits in goals. That's some depth.
Fun with Corsi: If you check out the Corsi charts, you'll see that the Devils have a wider range of values than the Sabres. Whereas the Sabres skaters ranged from -2 to 3, the Devils skaters ranged from -10 to 8. The Devils had their match-ups and stuck to them, I suppose.
Also: you'll notice that the Devils as a team finished at -1. That's really impressive given that they were winning for 50 minutes of this game. The Sabres had every reason to push hard, especially in the third period, to get back into this one. They got one past Brodeur before the halfway point through the second, they badly wanted to get a consecutive win for the first time in a long while, and their top line was finding offensive success against the Elias line. Yet, they only out-attempted the Devils by one at even strength. They only out-shot the Devils 18-17 in evens, 23-22 overall. The Devils really clamped down on them in the third period with only 6 allowed and not many more attempted. If nothing else, this speaks to how well the Devils played overall tonight.
One Assist, One Unofficial Missed Shot, 22 Saves: Martin Brodeur had a very good night. For the first time in a long, long while, Brodeur only allowed one goal. And that one goal can't really be pinned on Brodeur. It was on a very short rebound during a penalty kill that went right to Vanek at the crease. Vanek kicked it to his stick and chipped it in on his flank. Maybe Anton Volchenkov could have covered him better; but it's a PK,
The last time Brodeur accomplished that, it was on November 23 against Columbus - and that goal was literally a bad bounce against NJ. The last time the team allowed one or no goals against was on November 25, their next game, at Long Island; so it's been a long, long while for the Devils as a whole. While 22 saves isn't a lot, Buffalo tried to get Brodeur moving and surprise him with looks. It may have fooled the Devils defenders, but not Brodeur. He made a great stacked-pad save to rob Pominville in the first period; he didn't panic when white jerseys were left alone in front of him; and he handled the puck very well. After all, he did spring Sykora into the neutral zone that led to the team's first goal. He even took a chance at an empty net - missing only by a foot or two to the left. #30 looked good, felt good, and played good. Good.
Did Kovalchuk and/or Parise Make a Statement Tonight?: Sort of. Let's talk about Kovalchuk first. I know he wanted to prove a point after being unhappy with himself on Monday. Well, he didn't get a point and he even only played 20:49. That's not for a lack of trying. He got 3 shots on net, had 2 attempts blocked, and missed the net 4 times. No other Devil had as many attempts as Kovalchuk tonight. And Kovalchuk had every right to make those attempts. The Buffalo PK allowed him space on the power play which yielded 2 shots on net, a post, and some close misses. I thought he had more on net, but the scorer saw otherwise. He wasn't too shabby at evens; Kovalchuk was present on the forecheck and was a positive possession player at +5 Corsi. Given that Kovalchuk isn't always a positive player when it comes to Corsi or Fenwick, +5 from him is pretty good. As with the team, I'd say he was solid tonight.
Parise's night was more productive. Parise tipped Mark Fayne's shot at the point, which made it 3-0 New Jersey before the game's halfway mark. Parise finished the night with 4 shots on net, 1 attempt blocked, one unrecorded but incredible back-check that prevented a 2-on-0 in the slot in the second period, and a +7 in Corsi. His main mistakes were a silly minor penalty in the first period and telegraphing a pass on two odd-man rushes in the second that yielded nothing. Not too bad as far as mistakes go. That Henrique line saw Buffalo's unit of Derek Roy, Drew Stafford, and Brad Boyes the most and had the better of that matchup. Parise had a very good game; it was more of what I want to see from #9. Were Parise or Kovalchuk particularly dominant? No. Did they make a big statement? No. They played good hockey and that's good enough.
The Return of Adam Larsson: Larsson returned from Sweden after attending his grandmother's funeral. He came back and it was almost like he never left in the first place. Larsson played 20:04 overall and did OK. His one awful defensive zone giveaway only resulted in a whistle for offside in the first period. For the most part, he was calm and collected. What surprised me was that he didn't have a good Corsi value at -7, which is a bit odd given he played mostly with the Henrique line, who had a good possession night. Maybe he got beaten on by other Sabres? After all, he did see a decent amount of time against Pominville, who had 5 shots on net all by himself. Either way, I wasn't unhappy when
The Possible Last Hurrah (for now) from Matt Taormina: As Henrik Tallinder has been out, Matt Taormina has been making a statement to the Devils about his game. Peter DeBoer certainly thinks well of #32 as he was given 20:33 of ice time, including 2:53 of time on the PK. Taormina may not have been big and he may have been protected since his most common forward match-up involved Matt Ellis, Zack Kassian, and Luke Adam. Still, Taormina and the guys he was with usually won that battle as evidenced by Taormina's team-leading +8 in Corsi. Taormina also had 2 shots on net and one attempt in the slot blocked away in the second period. While Larsson got the love in the three stars of the game, I think Taormina was a better defenseman. Possibly on the whole team tonight, though I really liked how Anton Volchenkov didn't completely drown against Buffalo's top line as well as some of his five blocks. I hope that when Tallinder comes back, Taormina sticks around. If the Devils don't think he's a NHL defenseman after this run, then I'm not sure what else he needs to do to prove it.
Second Period Mayhem: One of the dumber parts of tonight's game was how the fracas not long after Parise's tip-in goal. Eric Boulton boarded Andrej Sekera in his own end. After that whistle, the next thing you know, gloves were being dropped, face washes were given, verbals were being spit at across arms and bodies holding players back. It was a bizarre scene, if only for Larsson and Patrick Kaleta tangling. The result of all of this: Boulton got two minors; Cody McCormick got a roughing minor to cancel out Boulton's; and game misconducts were handed out to Bryce Salvador, Cam Janssen, Paul Gaustad, and Kaleta. Nobody was thrown out of the game; but among that group, only Salvador kept playing regular minutes since he was, you know, a defenseman on this team.
PK Not Perfect, Still Shining: The Buffalo Sabres entered tonight's game with a hot power play; 7 goals in their last 5 games. They can now claim 8 over their last 6. I already explained the goal, but if you check out the video, you'll see it came not long after Pominville whiffed on an empty net opportunity. Their power play shortly after the second period fracas was their best. Yet, the Devils PK did their usual deal. They held Buffalo to only 5 shots on net across their 4 power plays; they got a shorthanded shot on goal; and they pressured the Sabres appropriately to win pucks. They bailed out two silly penalties, Parise's minor and a bench minor for too many men on the ice (which wiped out an amazing save by Miller on Sykora). The Devils PK remains fantastic, even if they weren't perfect this evening.
The Power Play Did Not Suck: No shorthanded shots allowed, 5 shots across 2 opportunities, and a Kovalchuk slapshot that hit the post in the second period. It may sound like I've lowered the bar for praising the power play. Well, you're right. The bar was lowered; but they were above it tonight. Yay.
Wherefore Art Thou, Tedenby?: Mattias Tedenby got his minutes cut tonight. He was playing regularly with David Clarkson and Travis Zajac for two periods; yet he only got 9 seconds in the third period. Tim Sestito - yes, the Tim Sestito - replaced him on that third line. While his most memorable moment was an amazing-looking slapshot in the slot that he missed the net on in the third period, Sestito wasn't a liability. He finished a +3 in Corsi (2 missed shots), while Tedenby amassed -1 (0 shooting attempts) in his two periods of play. Clarkson and Zajac both finished positive as well, so all of that ENERGY didn't bring either player down in the third period. What does that say about Tedenby that DeBoer is willing to give Sestito his spot in the third period of a 3-1 game?
Buffalo Tidbit: Pominville and Kassian each had 5 shots on net this evening. Those two, on separate lines, represented 43.4% of all of Buffalo's offense tonight. Pominville is Buffalo's top player, so I can't really fault the Devils for doing that - especially it means holding Vanek to only one other shot on net. Kassian, on the other hand, did he really threaten to score?
Toronto Does Not Always Hate the Devils: Before Parise tipped in a goal to make it 3-0, Buffalo thought they scored prior on a deflection of their own. Luke Adam deflected a puck past Brodeur's right. Or did he? The referee on the ice waved it off, claiming Adam's stick was too high. The officials went to Toronto for review and, believe it or not, they agreed. Remember this in case you feel the War Room in Toronto or the NHL has it out for New Jersey. That all said, I feel a little sympathy for Buffalo fans. If Adam's stick was high, it wasn't by much given the replay shown at the Rock.
It's Worth Mentioning Again: The Devils held onto a third period lead. They matched Buffalo shot-for-shot and could have more if it wasn't for some shots pulled wide. It was - what else? - a solid effort defensively and even on offense at times. I would have liked more SOGs, but I can't complain given that the Devils weren't giving Buffalo anything easy. They really defended their lead. It feels so good to write that for a change given the last few games.
That's my take on tonight's victory; now I want to know yours. Who on the Devils impressed you the most? Who disappointed you the most? What would you like to see different for Saturday's game against Pittsburgh? Isn't it great that the Devils actually took a lead into the third period and maintained it? Please leave your comments and other thoughts on tonight's win in the comments. Thanks to everyone who commented and read the gamethread, as well as those who followed @InLouWeTrust during the game. Thank you for reading.
42 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You praise Kovalchuk’s game but I was not a fan. I didn’t think he did very much – his linemates were involved with a lot of stuff, but he was not. He was good on the power play, but I didn’t like him at even strength. I think it’s about time for the Kovalchuk at RW experiment to end, the Henrique line is a disaster in their own zone with all the switching off and Kovalchuk keeps breaking out to the LW side.
Obviously Brodeur’s effort was commendable and I think he’s earned the next start.
It’s a shame that Taormina will probably be squeezed out of the lineup because there’s a lot to like there.
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
Kovy did not impress me tonight either
After a good stretch of games, the past 2 have not been good to Kovy. Tonight he looked good on the PP, but at even strength he was just lost. The puck slid off his stick numerous times and he got bottled up with his linemates a lot. During the breakouts, he naturally streaks toward the left side and then it seems like he has to pull up, drift right, and make a forced play. I agree and think he needs to play LW.
Tao I think has played well and I love his offensive nature. He jumped up on the odd man rush on the left side tonight (maybe in the 2nd or 3rd I don’t remember) and took a great shot. We need more of that from our defense and I really enjoyed watching him push the puck.
Baseball players are smarter than football players. How often do you see a baseball team penalized for too many men on the field? ~Jim Bouton
by LaserVortex888 on Dec 29, 2011 12:28 AM EST up reply actions
If I remember correctly from the game, Kovalchuk was instrumental on keeping possession on the forecheck leading up to Zach Parise’s goal. I thought he cycled the puck well and made good passes. I don’t recall a lot of the usual bottle-necking that happens between him and Zach. Maybe I’m just misremembering the game.
Check out The Crash Line Blog: www.thecrashline.com
I didn’t think he did very much – his linemates were involved with a lot of stuff, but he was not. He was good on the power play, but I didn’t like him at even strength. I think it’s about time for the Kovalchuk at RW experiment to end, the Henrique line is a disaster in their own zone with all the switching off and Kovalchuk keeps breaking out to the LW side.
He attempted more shots than any one on either side of the puck. Plus, I don’t think allowing 5 shots against is really a disaster. Maybe on other nights they got rolled, like in the Carolina game; but agree to disagree.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Dec 29, 2011 10:37 AM EST up reply actions
How many of those attempts were scoring chances? 1? 2? Corsi in a single game isn’t going to tell you all that much.
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
60 solid minutes
The Devils put pressure on the Sabres until the very end tonight and I was very impressed. When they play a full 60 minutes they look like a very complete and highly competitive team, which we all like to see.
I thought I missed a line change or something when I saw Sestito out there and not Tedenby at the beginning of the third. Then I realized throughout the period he was absent from the play. It kills me to see him sit on the bench when he has some explosive talents that this team desperately needs sometimes.
Baseball players are smarter than football players. How often do you see a baseball team penalized for too many men on the field? ~Jim Bouton
by LaserVortex888 on Dec 29, 2011 12:22 AM EST reply actions
A lot of people must have got tickets for the holidays – attendance was 17,625 (a sellout).
In Lou We Trust: SBN Blog of the New Jersey Devils
by Matthew Ventolo on Dec 29, 2011 1:31 AM EST reply actions
I was shocked. The two seats next to mine have only had bodies in them for opening night, Niedermayer night, the Rangers game and now a mid-week game against the Sabres? Wow.
Check out The Crash Line Blog: www.thecrashline.com
Those games are the 4 sellouts this season. Season average is 14,900+. Better than last year and on pace with 08-09 season
In Lou We Trust: SBN Blog of the New Jersey Devils
by Matthew Ventolo on Dec 29, 2011 4:34 PM EST up reply actions
Sykora is proving himself to be quite a steal! So much so that the Associated Press thinks he was still a Devil in 2003:
“He played well,” Brodeur said of Sykora, with whom he won the Stanley Cup in 2000 and 2003.
/facepalm At least they aren’t saying that the Ducks beat the Devils in the 2003 Finals again like they used to (repeatedly).
tao needs to stay
Devs need his speed and offense at the blue line. Vol and sal and larsson all hAve earned d spots of late. It should open competition between tallinder foster and fayne for last two spots.
by max16s on Dec 29, 2011 4:23 AM EST via mobile reply actions
That would be good. 7 defenseman would definately help
by Marty'sBetter on Dec 29, 2011 8:47 AM EST up reply actions
I would rather see Tao and Urbom both go back to Albany and get top defense pairing minutes in the AHL. Otherwise we will just be stunting Tao’s growth as a defenseman.
When Andy Greene comes back we’re going to have to make someone a healthy scratch anyways…
Check out The Crash Line Blog: www.thecrashline.com
I’m not sure why Fayne and Tallinder need to compete for anything. Fayne’s been solid and Tallinder has been solid prior to his injury. They’re definitely the lineup. Foster, on the other hand, I don’t think is so vital so DeBoer could rotate those two.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Dec 29, 2011 10:35 AM EST up reply actions
Foster’s shot is certainly a viable weapon, but I’m convinced that with a little more work Mark Fayne could take over that spot on the top unit and Larsson/Greene could work the opposite point on the second unit.
Check out The Crash Line Blog: www.thecrashline.com
Sykora seemed a bit pissed, no?
Was it me or did Sykora look a little pissed that he wasnt out there for end of the game for a possible empty netter? I could be wrong, but I didnt see him out there. I know he really wanted it and he definately had his chances to get it.
I think you’re right about this. He really wanted a shot at a hat trick. Unfortunately PDB knows he can’t afford another third period collapse like the one’s they’ve seen so frequently lately.
Check out The Crash Line Blog: www.thecrashline.com
I don’t know. Sykora probably wouldn’t have had a shot at it, though. As it turned out, the best attempt any Devil had at that ENG was Brodeur’s long shot that went wide. It’s not like any of the other Devils really got loose and made an attempt.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Dec 29, 2011 10:34 AM EST up reply actions
Regarding the first goal
The first goal he scored was an accident. Ryan Miller just completely misplayed Sykora’s shot.
Sykora’s shot deflected off of the toe of Regehr’s skate and changed angles. It was still a fluky goal, but I don’t think Miller misplayed it so much as was surprised by it.
Yeah. Its amazing miller even got a piece of that shot as it redirected pretty significantly.
Also, i’ve never seen a high-stick goal review overturn a call. Ever. (unless it was the deflection itself that was in question.)
This includes the goal when bobby ryan’s stick was above his head.
Mike Weber Pressbox Incarceration Status: Free to roam the blueline.
"Ville Leino may stink but he’s still way better than Colin Stuart."
The problem with overturning a ruling on the ice is that there are no definitive, straight-on level angles to look at so everything is guesswork based on where the stick appears to be in relation to the player, which lends itself heavily toward not being ‘irrefutable evidence’.
In real time I thought it high, but some of the replays made me wonder.
That call wasn’t overturned. The refs must’ve overturned their call even before they went to toronto, as they had it as a high stick on the ice.
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
No question Taormina needs to stay, he’s showing more and more offensive upside. He’s got the skills to be a good offensive dman.
Kovy was completely lost at evens, the RW experiment has to end. i would give a last chance to Tedenby with the Henrique line. Kovy will be fine on the Zajac line.
Good game by Marty
"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"
by Elektrostal_Kid on Dec 29, 2011 10:00 AM EST via mobile reply actions
If Taormina stays then who do you bench? I argued above that running him as a seventh defender or giving him forward minutes or just special teams minutes would stunt his growth. I’d rather see him get top pairing minutes back in Albany with Urbom.
If Taormina stays then what do you do when Andy Greene returns and now you have 8 defensemen?
Check out The Crash Line Blog: www.thecrashline.com
if Tao continues to show he’s ready for the NHL, I see Greene traded at the deadline. We lack of RW everywhere ( nhlers and prospects) and we’ve got plenty of respectable prospects defensemen too. Urbom could be ready next season, Gelinas is improving quickly. iF Tao keeps playing this way until Greene comes back.Trading Andy would make a lot of sense imo.
"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"
by Elektrostal_Kid on Dec 29, 2011 10:42 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
@elesias: I don’t think giving each d-man two less minutes a night so that Matt Taormina could play for 10 minutes would be helpful to our current corps of defenders nor would it be helpful to Taormina’s development. The best way to develop a young defender is to give them more minutes. Taormina can get 22+ minutes a game with Urbom (his partner) in Albany. To me this is the preferable scenario because next season Salvador and Foster will be UFA’s and then Taormina and Urbom could be ready to step in. Like you said, it’s not a bad problem to have, but there’s no need to rush these guys.
@Elektrostal: I don’t think Tao has shown he’s ready for the NHL. He had a great night last night but I need to see consistency in my d-men. I’m 99% sure that once Tallinder is healthy again that both Urbom and Taormina will get sent back to Albany to continue developing. I don’t see how trading Andy Greene makes any sense as he’s proven for many years now that he is a competent defenseman who can play over 20 minutes a night. Matt Taormina has done nothing of the sort and most likely won’t do so over the next 3-6 weeks it takes for Greene to return. Especially if he’s rolled as a 7th defender and only gets 10 minutes a night.
Check out The Crash Line Blog: www.thecrashline.com
Cutting each defenseman’s minutes the same amount is only one way to account for his minutes, but it probably isn’t the best method in any way except on paper as it doesn’t account for match-ups and special teams, etc.
Reducing the load on the workhorses like Larsson helps keep them from wearing down, especially on back to backs and with all the OT games the Devils have and may continue to play.
I’m not particularly in favor of playing 7 defenseman per game, though the idea is growing on me the more I think about it, but if it’s going to happen it’ll be because Taormina is ready, in which case any thoughts about his development or rushing him are moot.
If he’s indeed at a point where the coaching staff feels comfortable moving him up full time as opposed to just filling in for injury, then they likely feel he’s developed about as far as he can in Albany and any growth he still requires is going to have to come in the NHL.
remember last season Matt was already doing very well. If you don’t give players a decent shot how could you know what they’re really worth, see Henrique, sooner or later they’got to make the jump and that always be risky. i’m fairly ok with Taormina since he’s been called up, he’s ready imo, but it would be up to the management to decide what is more important. To fil the big RW hole with a good player like Greene or to keep the blue line more experienced.
"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"
by Elektrostal_Kid on Dec 29, 2011 11:16 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
A good effort from the whole team. 60 solid minutes to win; nothing more, nothing less. Let’s not break up Parisalchuk unless completely necessary because the line ain’t broke so no need to fix it.
I like Tao also but he definitely needs polish. Tallinder should rightfully reclaim his spot.
I hope I never see that janssen/boulton/sestito line again. Despite the “energy”, it is an apocalyptic liability.
by rtrstevec on Dec 29, 2011 11:33 AM EST via mobile reply actions
KOVY....
WHEN IS THE LAST TIME KOVY GOT A NICE PASS FROM HENRIQUE OR PARISE ON 5 ON 5??????
2 on 1 Zach missed is pass (or stop by defense). Then Henrique and Kovy 2-1 but Henrique never passed and took a week shot with no angle….Kovy came back to the bench and slam the door so hard that everyone look at him!!!!!!!!!!!
We could blame Kovy for turnover(S) but lets be fair: He asked to play on the left wing where he is clearly not comfortable and then hardly get setup??? WTF this is why he has more pass than goals this year. He is a sniper and he needs to be setup and shoot!!!
What’s the point to have a Ferrari if you drive it like a Toyota Corolla??
As far as I’m concerned, Tallinder can stay a scratch. I don’t like him all that much. I would much rather give Taormina the ice time so long as he’s playing as good as he’s playing right now. He seems to be getting more comfortable out there every game. I don’t know about Tallinder, he just doesn’t do it for me. I have really enjoyed watching the defence unit without Tallinder in it. Maybe they should consider trading him. Free up some cap space. (For Parise?).
Also, if Tedenby doesn’t get it going soon they should maybe think about sending him to Albany. He just doesn’t seem to have any confidence or something. I don’t know about any of you guys but it doesn’t even look like he made any atempt to put on any muscle in the offseason. He needs to work out. He is always getting pushed around too much.
agree to disagree
Baseball players are smarter than football players. How often do you see a baseball team penalized for too many men on the field? ~Jim Bouton
by LaserVortex888 on Dec 29, 2011 6:37 PM EST up reply actions
Henrik Tallinder doesn’t have a whole lot of trade value out there. He does a lot of things average or even above average, but he doesn’t do too many things so particularly well to be noteworthy. He also has a contract that isn’t the easiest to move while there’s uncertainty regarding the financial landscape of the NHL — I can’t imagine too many teams will be eager to take on multiyear deals this year without knowing what the salary cap situation is going to look like. Tallinder has two more years left on his contract after this season, and he makes a good deal of money ($3.375 million per). You won’t get a whole lot back, certainly not enough to compensate for what you’ll lose by giving him up.
If the Devils are going to trade away a veteran defenseman, the guy to look at is Bryce Salvador. Even so, I don’t believe the return would be substantial — think Martin Skoula and his “trade price”, and you’re probably in the neighborhood.
….
Matt Taormina is pretty similar to Kuris Foster, only Foster shoots right-handed and Foster is a heck of a lot bigger. In the event the Devils get completely healthy on the blue line — which is asking a lot, especially as neither Volchenkov nor Salvador have sustained injuries (and both have a long history of doing so) — Foster is probably competing with Salvador for the last spot on the blue line.
Taormina might be part of the discussion going forward, at least for next year. He can also be an important part of the depth the team would need to make a sustained playoff run, because you often need 8-10 D-men if you’re going to go three or four rounds. Let’s not get ahead of ourselves — eight games as a third-pairing defenseman isn’t a whole lot from which to extrapolate, let alone declare him one of our six best defensemen.

by 
























