David Clarkson & New Jersey Devils Snap Losing Streak; Beat Toronto Maple Leafs 3-2 in OT
Tonight would be the end of a very disappointing road trip for the New Jersey Devils. Their last home game was a loss; their first road game after a three day break was a horrible loss; and while they played well on a back-to-back set, they lost the first and second game on the set. They went into it with a loss and the following three games were also losses. Add that up and you get a four-game losing streak and a lot of frustrated Devils fans.
Tonight would turn out to be the end of that losing streak. After Dainius Zubrus stopped a botched shot by Carl Gunnarsson at the point, he attacked up ice. He drew away from the defense and looked to his left. He saw David Clarkson, who hesitated at the blueline and trailed towards the high slot, wide open. Clarkson settled it and fired a hammer low past Gunnarsson and through James Reimer's five hole. It shut up most of the Air Canada Centre, and it lifted all of the Devils around the world. Clarkson's second goal of the game managed to earn the Devils two points.
Of course, it was not one of New Jersey's better efforts. They played an amazing first period. They out-shot the Leafs 11-4 and out-did them in Corsi at +8. The Devils got two power plays and actually converted on both of them. They even drew a third call right near the end of the period, so they had every reason to keep driving over the Maple leafs in their own building. The Devils looked that great, as did the score.
Yet, Ron Wilson certainly wasn't going to let his team suffer like that. Whether or not it was his words or the scoreboard, but the Leafs fought back. The Devils power play reverted to it's usual self, with the complementary shorthanded chance allowed (thanks Adam Larsson). At even strength, the Leafs started pounding the Devils in deep. They ultimately out-shot them in the period 16-5 overall and 11-3 at evens. Yet, the only scoreboard response came when a puck from Jofferey Lupul hit Phil Kessel's skate and deflected into the net. A fluke cut the lead to one.
The first 90 seconds or so of the third period saw that the Devils weren't going to have a repeat of the second period. Yet you could argue it was more of the same with respect to past third periods in November in one area. Early on, Matt Frattin equalized when he torched Adam Larsson and put a shot off the far post and in. Yep, another lead blown. The play wasn't one-sided though; most of the third bounced back and forth. The Devils ended regulation behind in possession with a -4, but they were only out-shot by one (9-10). The Leafs had their chances, while the Devils had some pressure of their own. That alone separates it from past third periods where the action was at one end of the rink, like the second period of tonight's game. Of the Devils' chances, the most glorious in my view was one by Clarkson. He was sprung right in the slot one-on-one with Reimer. After skating to his left, Clarkson put the shot high; it's unclear whether Reimer even made a save, but it was a wasted chance. One that Clarkson would seemingly rue.
With that in mind, it's absolutely fantastic that Clarkson got another opportunity in overtime to put the Devils ahead and succeeded. It was a good read and a good rush up ice from Zubrus; and Clarkson's off-the-puck movement was rewarded. The shot was even better and so the Devils finally get their first "W" since the last full week of November. It wasn't a complete effort against Toronto; but it wasn't like the Devils only played 20 minutes and just sat back to get to overtime either. As usual, there are areas that the players and coaches need to work on for future games. However, we can properly praise the team knowing they got and earned a result they badly needed.
I will get to that praise and criticism after the jump. For the opposition's perspective, please visit your local Ottawa-haters at Pension Plan Puppets.
The Stats: The NHL.com Game Summary | The NHL.com Event Summary | The NHL.com Play by Play Log | The NHL.com Shot Summary | The Time on Ice Shift Charts | The Time on Ice Head to Head Ice Time Charts | The Time on Ice Corsi ChartsThe Highlights: Do you want to see two Devils power play goals and a sweet game winning goal in overtime? Sure, you do. Check out this video from NHL.com:
Tonight's Heroic Performance was Played by David Clarkson: Before this game, David Clarkson went seven games without a goal or a point. He has been slumping as much as anyone on the Devils. Tonight was his breakout night. He scored the Devils' second power play goal when he was found wide open by Zach Parise in front of the net. It was a great finish for a guy who has been struggling to put up points. It was even better to see him fire that puck through Reimer's legs to win the game in overtime. Usually, that alone would be enough; Clarkson did more than just score one goal tonight.
He also put up 6 shots on net to lead the Devils in that department. He was the team's top man in Corsi with a +8 and also in Fenwick at +9. Given that he saw the Tyler Bozak line more often than not at evens and the Devils finished at -4, that's just impressive. OK, the Ryan Carter line wasn't always attacking; there were some harrowing moments in their own end tonight. Clarkson still was a positive player throughout the evening. Overall, I'd say it was one of Clarkson's best games in a while.
The Non-heroics of Adam Larsson: I know he's a rookie, but Larsson was miserable tonight. He fell down backchecking a puck to prevent a shorthanded chance for Pascal Dupuis, and he managed to swipe the puck right to him in the process. Larsson got torched on the Frattin equalizer, which was just plain sad to watch. He's had his share of soft plays on the puck and poor clearances as usual. He didn't contribute much on offense with only two attempts, both blocked by Leafs. Most of all, he got beaten regularly at evens. He was a -16 in Corsi and a -13 in Fenwick; both of which are just plain awful values. What makes it worse is that, according to the head to head ice time charts, it doesn't appear Ron Wilson put a particular match-up on him - he just rolled players on him.
Larsson played the majority of his 19:03 at even strength with Bryce Salvador, who wasn't always in a spot to help out much. Anyone looking for a change in the pairings may be disappointed since the other two (Henrik Tallinder & Mark Fayne; Andy Greene & Anton Volchenkov) have done well. He's very much a rookie but he needs to get it together in his own end of the rink. I understand part of it is very much an issue of experience; but it's also in positioning and playing with the puck. Other teams will certainly target him in the future and he needs to be get better in the latter categories lest he become a liability.
Another Streak Snapped: The Devils snapped a losing streak, which is good. The Adam Henrique line had their scoring streak at evens snapped, which is not good. It wasn't a great night by the threesome of Henrique, Ilya Kovalchuk, and Zach Parise. They certainly put in a good effort on the ice; Parise and Kovalchuk forechecked noticeably well and the duo combined for 7 shots on net. However, they were dominated in Corsi: Parise was -6, Henrique was -10; and Kovalchuk was -12. Wilson used the pairing of Gunnarsson and Dion Phaneuf against them more often than not, and that may explain why they didn't generate all that much outside of the first period. That's a difficult pairing to breakdown and I'm sure the other Leafs skaters were told to watch for #17 and #9. Hence, that line didn't a lot of shots on net at evens, just 3, and so that streak was snapped.
I Loved Half of the Power Play: The Devils' first two power plays tonight were just great. They got into the zone, they had good possession, and they moved the puck around in a way that created some space. The Leafs PK didn't pick up on the mightiness of Kovalchuk's one timer, instead hoping to block the shot instead of preventing it. While Kovalchuk was blocked a few times, he did get at least one past them - and Reimer - for the game's first goal. Clarkson's goal was been prettier as the Devils' power play actually caught the Leafs' PK out of position and out of sorts. Given how bad the Devils' power play has been at times this season, that's simply fantastic. It also means the Leafs are terrible on the penalty kill.
Of course, it didn't last forever. The third and fourth opportunities weren't nearly as good as the first two. They had 4 shots on the first two opportunities, but only 2 and a non-shot on the later two. Let's talk about the non-shot. Parise did beat Reimer on shot down low not long after Dupuis' shorthanded attempt, but it struck the post. The puck bounced out almost in a perfect spot for Elias. He was ready to knock the loose puck into the net, but a Toronto defender prevented that from happening at the last moment (the first of two times that would happen to Elias tonight). That non-shot (shots that hit posts don't count as shots) would be the closest the Devils would come to scoring on the PP this evening. The fourth one was just a waste.
Martin Brodeur Was At Least Pretty Good Tonight: The narrative that Brodeur is done or just about done will just have to wait or be parroted by someone who didn't see this game. Brodeur played quite well for the Devils tonight. He impressively denied all seven of Phil Kessel's actual shots on net. The record will show eight; that's because he scored when a puck bounced off his skate, which is hardly an actual shot. Still, Kessel was fiercely effective tonight and Brodeur just shut him down save for one bad bounce. Brodeur's best save was when Kessel had just enough space to pull away from Tallinder. Tallinder swiped at Kessel's stick, which had some effect, but Brodeur had to come up big to deny the league's leading scorer. Not only did he make the first stop, he robbed him on the rebound. Brodeur was solid all night long and you can argue his only real error may have been on the Frattin goal, where he was beaten glove side. I'm iffy on that, but even if you fault him there, it's clear that Brodeur had a very fine evening in net. The critics will just have to wait for another day to declare his end.
Did the Shake Up Work: Peter DeBoer decided to shake up the lines by switching Zubrus and Mattias Tedenby. Did it work? It's hard to say. The Elias line definitely wasn't a net positive. Tedenby was a positive in possession with a +4 in Corsi; but he only had one shot on net and didn't see the ice in the final 10 minutes of the game. Petr Sykora finished positive with a +3 in Corsi and 3 shots on net; yet Elias surprisingly finished negative at -5 to go with his 3 shots on net. Given that the Zubrus-Elias-Sykora unit has been a solid positive possession unit, I can't say this is a good thing to see in the short-term.
What about the other line? Clarkson had a great night as noted earlier, so there's that. It seems Clarkson was the sole stand out on that line. Carter was just OK and had only one shot on net. At least he was positive at +6 in Corsi; Zubrus was a -5 and didn't register a shot on net. This isn't to say Zubrus was totally useless; after all, he set up the game winning goal. Yet, it doesn't speak well to how he did overall as a group.
Late in regulation, DeBoer switched Zubrus back with Elias and Sykora, so I suspect that this shake up may be short lived. We shall see in later games, though.
Some Leafs Praise: Their top five in my view was the Tyler Bozak line with Phaneuf and Gunnarsson on defense. Kessel was just all over the place with 8 shots on net, Lupul and Bozak helped make it happen for #81, and Phaneuf and Gunnarson were solid all night long. That group is a tough one to break down, and Ron Wilson played the match-up game well, mixing it up so the Devils couldn't get settled with one line for the most part. As their secondary scoring blossoms (e.g. Frattin, Grabovski), their goaltending situation gets sorted, and their PK stops being hot garbage, this Toronto team could be quite good. Say what you will about the Devils giving up a two goal lead, but the Leafs clearly showed they have the offensive talent to make that up and they're not going to break down after a bad (for them) period. It's easy to demand a 60 minute effort; but when you play quality opponents like the Leafs - especially on the road - it's incredibly difficult to be the better team for 60 minutes straight.
Teach Me How To Lupul: Here are some steps as I understand it:
Step 1: Stand close to a person.
Step 2: Do something to draw that person's attention (e.g. hit them).
Step 3: Get touched in response to a part of the body (e.g. the thigh, the shin)
Step 4: Reel back and gesture/howl about how badly hurt you are.
Follow these steps and you too can Do the Lupul.
But, seriously, Elias has to be smarter than to retaliate to some physical play. It was a very weak slash, but even late in the game, the refs aren't going to tolerate actions of revenge. As much as Lupul sold it, I can't really complain about the penalty.
Thankfully, the league's best penalty killers not only killed that late game penalty, but they held the Leafs to no shots on net. Once again, we must say thank you to the members of the PK units and Dave Barr for killing this one and one other penalty this evening.
One Shot on Goal but SO MUCH ENERGY...: Tim Sestito wasn't totally useless tonight. He was (somehow) a positive player in Corsi at +5 and actually had an offensive move. Sestito picked up a loose puck, got around a defender, and curled around the net for a wraparound attempt. Reimer actually had to make a somewhat difficult stop with his pad. It was a Good Move by Sestito. It showed some actual energy.
The rest of his night? Simply meh. That wrap around was his sole shot on net.
Yes, Coaching Adjustments Were Made: I will say that the Devils did make good adjustments in the third period. The Maple Leafs owned most of the second period, but they didn't dominate nearly as often in the third. The Leafs kept trying to open the game up so guys like Kessel, Lupul, or anyone with speed (e.g. Frattin) could catch the Devils unaware. Save for Frattin beating Larsson, the Devils defenders hung back enough to make sure the Leafs wouldn't get too many breakaways or odd-man rushes. The Devils team weren't conservative, they just didn't get careless in their positioning. It also helped the Devils get stops in their own end and turn the puck up ice for some offense. Those adjustments helped the Devils out regardless of the fact that Leafs tied the game. It ensured the Leafs wouldn't repeat their second period performance in the third, which I felt was an important reason why the game turned out the way they did.
There are still some questions to be asked, like the usage of Eric Boulton in spot duty late in the game, or the utilization of the fourth line, and so forth. Still, credit is due where it's due with respect to not hanging the goalie out to dry with breakaway after breakaway.
Now That I Think About It: Wasn't it nice to see a Devils game where they didn't have a back-breaking giveaway?
While that's how I saw tonight's game, I want to know your take. How did you react when Clarkson scored? (I let out a yelp of joy.) What about the Devils performance did you like the most? What did you like the least? What was your take on the shake up in the Devils lines? Should DeBoer keep them? What do you think the Devils need to do to avoid taking a step back after breaking their losing streak tonight? Please leave your answers and other thoughts on tonight's game in the comments. Thanks to everyone who read and commented in the Gamethread; thanks to everyone who followed @InLouWeTrust on Twitter; and thank you for reading.
43 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Awesome game!!
Very happy for Clarkson, especially after he missed that backhander in front near end of reg. Nice job from Marty too, those blocks on Kessel were supreme.
by Special_Delivery on Dec 6, 2011 11:46 PM EST via iPhone app reply actions
I said it and I’ll say it again, Larsson should be paired with Volchenkov, I feel it since Day1….
… So basically I can’t prove it
"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"
by Elektrostal_Kid on Dec 7, 2011 12:24 AM EST reply actions
I’d actually prefer Larsson with Tallinder, because I don’t want to give #5 the tougher defensive matchups that we can use Volchenkov for. That, and Tallinder seems to be a steadying and positive influence on young defensemen (Myers in Buffalo, Fayne here in NJ) and I’d like to try and take advantage of that for Larsson.
I’m ok for Tallinder with Larsson…. But only if Volchenkov ends up with Fayne.
I’m tired of Salvador and a bit of Greene too they both are disappointing. Can’t believe that would make a $ 6millions cap-hit defensive pair. ugh !!!!!
"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"
by Elektrostal_Kid on Dec 7, 2011 1:55 PM EST up reply actions
Bryce Salvador is our fourth-highest paid defenseman in terms of cap hit. If we play our “normal” lineup on the blue line, we’re guaranteed to have a “$6 million cap hit pairing” simply by the mathematics.
Do I think Salvador is worth his $2.9 million hit? Absolutely not. Do I think Greene is worth his $3 million hit? I wasn’t a big fan of his re-signing at the time, and even less of a fan of the term he got. I’m not thrilled with it, but this team has many other substantial problems that need addressing before we worry about this one.
I think, particularly under Pete Deboer’s management, the defensive line-up is a concern. Deboer’’s system is asking the D-men to be directly connected to the game. But the defense is too slow to react with bad hockey sense. I know Larsson will improve but in general we need more skilled defensemen to play his system in my opinion. Someone like Salvador is not playing that bad but it’s clear he’s not the kind of player that fits in an aggressive system. Sadly I’m sure that won’t get better, I believe he’s going to regress.
Maybe we need to address certain things before our defense. but not that many. It’s one of our biggest weakness if you ask me. We need a #1 defenseman, really.
"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"
by Elektrostal_Kid on Dec 7, 2011 5:32 PM EST up reply actions
True #1 defensemen don’t grow on trees. They don’t come available particularly often, either through trade or free agency…. and when they do, the price is usually very high. The Devils need one…. but so do a lot of other teams. Adam Larsson might be that mythical creature in a few years, but he’s long way from it right now.
If I thought there was an easy way to address the defense, I’d offer one. I don’t think Bryce Salvador goes anywhere, much as I’d like for him to be moved. Lou isn’t about to cut him or bury him in Albany unless his play devolves to the point where there isn’t a choice. There’s no trade market for an aging, injury-prone, declining defenseman at the moment — let alone one with his contract and cap hit — and there might not be one at the trade deadline either. I think we’re stuck with the defense corps we’ve got for the time being.
I don’t know that it’s necessarily a case where the defense corps is being asked to play a system it isn’t suited for. My opinion is that we simply don’t have a particularly talented defense corps in general, and that it would struggle playing just about any style. We’ve got a bunch of second-pairing defensemen (Tallinder, Greene, Volchenkov), a serviceable third-pairing veteran who will struggle when you ask him to do more (Salvador), and a pair of youngsters back there (Fayne and Larsson).
I think we’d all be happier if Lou Lamorello had gotten rid of Bryce Salvador and kept Colin White, instead of the other way around. I understand that Salvador’s concussion from last season likely prevented a buyout for legal/CBA reasons, but Colin White is simply a better player than Bryce Salvador and I think White could handle the mentorship role for Larsson (or Fayne) and provide leadership that this team could use.
I believe we can live with this defense corps for this season, and make changes after the year is done. I’m more worried about the offense, particularly the lack of depth and the lack of production across more than one line at a time. If Lou Lamoriello has any roster tweaks up his sleeve, I’d prefer he use them on the offense.
True #1 defensemen don’t grow on trees
I should’ve not talked about that stupid 1# defenseman cliché but you don’t need to be condescending acasser, I understand how it works, I just pointed out a weakness and never meant a “Salvador for Weber straight up”deal.
I can’t wait from Lou to do something about this though, the day he’ll get a good opportunity, sure.
I tend to agree with your last paragraph, besides a defenseman with a good all-around game, I wouldn’t complain about a RW. That is maybe our 1st weakness.
But honestly I don’t think we’ll see any big trade for the Devils this season, unless Zach wants out perhaps.
"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"
by Elektrostal_Kid on Dec 7, 2011 10:16 PM EST up reply actions
That wasn’t meant to be condescenion, I was aiming for that statement as a simple fact — there are very few “true #1 defenseman” in the NHL as many of us define the term. Even fewer of them appear on the trade or free agent market — the last three that come to mind are Chris Pronger, Zdeno Chara, and Dion Phaneuf. I figure that one becomes available (on average) every other season…. the Devils will seldom be significant players for one in free agency, and a trade can be problematic because some teams won’t deal with us for one reason or another.
and a trade can be problematic because some teams won’t deal with us for one reason or another.
pretty sure Lou has made a trade with every team in the NHL except the Flyers and Rangers since I’ve been a fan.
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
I know I went through the numbers some time ago in a vastly different post. Lou’s tenure dates back to April 30, 1987 (the actual date of his hiring — he assumed GM duties before the 1987-1988 season). The actual answer is that Lou doesn’t deal with a LOT of teams…. and I’ll include below the list of teams where it’s been at least 10 years since a trade was made.
Boston: last trade 10/16/1991
Buffalo: last trade 6/13/1987
Carolina: last trade 12/19/1995 (when they were still Hartford)
Chicago: last trade 11/13/1998
Colorado: last trade 11/3/1999 (Rolston-for-Lemieux)
Detroit: last trade 4/3/1995
Los Angeles: last trade 2/27/2001
Montreal: last trade 3/1/2000
NY Rangers: no trades
Ottawa: last trade 6/23/2001
Philadelphia: last trade 3/11/1986 (pre-Lou)
Tampa: last trade 11/9/2001
This isn’t to say that Lou isn’t capable of making a deal with any or all of these teams if the right offer were to arise. It’s just interesting to note that there’s a sizable list of teams he hasn’t consumated anything with in quite some time.
Dion Phaneuf was not a #1 defenseman when he was traded, not even close.
Colin White isn’t having much success out in San Jose, fwiw. They might’ve cut him at the right time.
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
I’m all or trying to change variables in an effort to spark young Larsson, but what’s the reason you specifically bring up Volchenkov?
I remain very disappointed in the lack of speed and hustle from Larsson. He’s also failed to keep in far too many picks at the point, despite one instance earlier this season when he beautifully saved one by threading it between his legs. He’s also getting picked on physically. There’s no doubt he’s shown the ability to use his body to make plays, but I feel like I’m seeing it less and less as the season continues. Seeing him continue to get outskated and punished physically is hard to watch. I think there comes a point where PDB and Lou ought to consider whether the massive amounts of playing time being given to Adam is truly going to be what’s best for him going forward. I’m not for drastically cutting his minutes or sending him to Albany at all, but I would hate to see these issues persist and ultimately end up resulting in an injury or major setback to his development.
by NJallDay on Dec 7, 2011 11:42 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Paired with Volchenkov, Larsson would probably see a thougher opposition but Android is our #1 shutdown Dman too. Maybe he could take some pressure off Adam’s shoulders in the defensive side of the game. I think their games could fit together pretty well.
"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"
by Elektrostal_Kid on Dec 7, 2011 1:49 PM EST up reply actions
I fell asleep midway thru the third period… only to wake up hours later for the MSG replay… just after Elias’ late pseudo penalty on Lupul.
PK killed it, Zuby zubed it, and Clarkie clarked it. What a HUGE streak-snapping win and a great way to head back to bed.
by Alan Wright on Dec 7, 2011 12:59 AM EST via mobile reply actions
…..continued…. Until the nightmare set in and you realized the Clarkson goal went to video review and wound up being called off for some absurd reason.
by NJallDay on Dec 7, 2011 12:10 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
No goal. Under rule 47.5.3 subsection 12, No player is permitted to score a game-winning goal in their home town unless they are playing for the hometown team. In such cases, the goal is to be immediately disallowed, the player given 2 minutes for unsportsmanlike conduct and forfeiture of game salary.
I’m not going to lie to you. It felt good and I’m going to do whatever is in my power possible to stay there as long as I can. - Petr Sykora on playing on a line with Elias and Parise.
the goal that beat brodeur glove side
i really thought he should have had. i think him 3 years ago would have had that one. maybe im wrong, but he looked old on that. then again, he looked great the rest of the game so maybe thats unfair.
עם ישראל חי
סבלנות
נח''ל
it was a good shot. Great effort by the shooter. Maybe a younger Marty would have had it, but it would have been highlight if not for the Kessel denials.
I’m not going to lie to you. It felt good and I’m going to do whatever is in my power possible to stay there as long as I can. - Petr Sykora on playing on a line with Elias and Parise.
taromina
With Kovy and Parise scoring at no where near a 40 goal season clip and with the devils struggling to get three goals a game with any consistency, its pretty obvious that more offensve from the blue line couldnt hurt. Andy Greene has been largely invisible and while Fayne, Larsson, and Tallider are each average two defenseman at this point, the devils still lack a single genuinely offensively minded and speedy defenseman. Why not give Taromina a chance? to the best of my knowledge he has put up some decent numbers at albany. Moreover, when the pairing of Volchenkov and Salvador are on the ice, the Devils really suffer in the offensive zone. Both bring kind of the same stay at home skills and neither can get the backside of a barn yard with a shot. Taromina would add some need speed and skill at the blue line and it might be worth giving him a couple weeks to see if he can find that shot he had before the unfortunate injury last year.
I like Tao, but you’re basing his abilities on 3-4 weeks from last season. He did look great. But the rest of the team looked terrible.
1. There’s no room on the blueline for another offensive defenseman. The only place he could go would be in place of Fayne, and the Devs seem hell-bent on making Fayne their 6th.
2. The Devs have lost a lot of games because of the opposition taking advantage of poorly timed defensive breakdowns and puck possession/turnover issues. Neither of these will be fixed by bringing in Tao.
3. There are plenty of offensive skills on this team. There’s just something, somewhere, perhaps cosmic, that is making opposing goalies play like Vezina candidates whenever they play the Devs. Maybe they are using the same plays too often, maybe they telegraph their passes or shots, maybe their “system” has been figured out in 29 other cities…I don’t know. Maybe they just have terrible luck (yep, I went there). But I watch every game and am boggled by the number of times I see the same series or play at both ends of the ice and the Devs get scored upon, and I yell “How the F*&% did he stop that!?” when the Devs do it.
Unless someone gets hurt, or the Devs decide to roll 7 defensemen, I wouldn’t expect to see Tao any time soon. He’s really not the solution to some obtuse problem anyway.
I’m not going to lie to you. It felt good and I’m going to do whatever is in my power possible to stay there as long as I can. - Petr Sykora on playing on a line with Elias and Parise.
I dont know what to feel about this. In my observations I’ve thought that the Devils have a major flaw in their lack of defenseman with te ability to fire a shot from the point. I’m not saying Tao is the guy because lets face it, he’s not the biggest guy in the world, but I’d still like to see him called up for a few games this year to gather a better idea of whether or not he can improve the offensive contributions of our blue line in other fashions.
by NJallDay on Dec 7, 2011 11:47 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Don’t get me wrong, I like him a lot. I think Larrson is the reason he isn’t in NJ this year. I’d like to see him in a few games as well. I just don’t agree with a guy doing respectably well in Albany being proposed as a solution at the Dev’s woes. He’s at about 0.5 points per game, has the team lead for SOG, a 4-8-12 line (good for 4th), but he’s only shooting at a little over 6%. I wouldn’t mind a couple games in place of Fayne, it’s just unreasonable to think that his presence will suddenly result in the Devs scoring 3 or 4 or 5 goals a game.
I’m not going to lie to you. It felt good and I’m going to do whatever is in my power possible to stay there as long as I can. - Petr Sykora on playing on a line with Elias and Parise.
By my eyes Fayne has been one of the most consistent defenseman on the team this year and is one of, if not the only one, with a dangerous point shot so I think I’d prefer not to sit him for Taormina.
While I wouldn’t mind seeing Taormina get a couple of games to see what he can do, it seems that the team has him deeper on the depth chart as evidenced by Urbom getting called up when Greene was iffy last week.
I think it’s just the roles they inhabit, elesias. If Larsson or Fayne were hurt, I think Taormina would be called up.
Also Fayne is 3rd in ice time and takes on some pretty difficult ice time – I don’t think he would be the one sitting.
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
hypothetically then, given that he’s played well enough to deserve a look…
Do you sit Green, or dress 7 and change it up as the situation warrants?
I’m not going to lie to you. It felt good and I’m going to do whatever is in my power possible to stay there as long as I can. - Petr Sykora on playing on a line with Elias and Parise.
I would sit Salvador but his cap-hit says no you can't
"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"
by Elektrostal_Kid on Dec 7, 2011 1:58 PM EST up reply actions
We want “a defenseman who can fire the puck on net from the point”, but we’re agitating to sit Mark Fayne? I must admit that I’m more than a little confused at that…. Fayne is the only guy on this defensive unit that has demonstrated the ability to consistently get the puck on net and through traffic.
I could get behind Murdoc’s idea of dressing seven defensemen, especially when one considers how seldom our fourth line sees the ice in the third period. I’m just not so sure I want Taormina to be the seventh guy — while Alexander Urbom didn’t particularly impress during last year’s time in Newark (short of that sweet, sweet wraparound goal against Boston), I think he’s the guy who is more “NHL ready” and who is more likely to stick with the club for the long haul.
Was it just me, or was Kessel channeling his inner Pavel Bure by seemingly always being open just outside of our blue line the instant the Leafs get the puck out of their zone?
It wasn’t just Kessel. The Leafs tried to stretch the game out with long passes, hoping to get behind the Devils’ defense. I noticed it mostly in the third period; I suspect Wilson wanted to see if the Devils could be broken down that way further after the equalizer. Therefore, Kessel, Frattin, etc. tended to dart ahead of his teammates when they recovered the puck.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Dec 7, 2011 8:43 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
I find it most concerning that teams continue to make adjustments after a dominant Devils first period, and the Devs do nothing to counter.
I’m not going to lie to you. It felt good and I’m going to do whatever is in my power possible to stay there as long as I can. - Petr Sykora on playing on a line with Elias and Parise.
Later today I will post a fanshot about how Kovalchuk is clearly to blame for the game tying goal last night.
Tedenby
I got home late from work and only saw part of the second and the third periods. My impression was that he showed he wasn’t delicate, wasn’t a defensive liability, could provide positive energy and initiate scoring chances. I’d still rather see him with Zubrus. But anyway, what did y’all think?
he played pretty well, still doesn’t have the coach’s confidence that he can play when the team is tied or within one in the third. He’ll need a few games where the Devs manage a 2+ goal lead in the third and they’ll put him out there to see if he can handle hanging onto it. Until then, he’ll be benched for at least the last half of the third.
I’m not going to lie to you. It felt good and I’m going to do whatever is in my power possible to stay there as long as I can. - Petr Sykora on playing on a line with Elias and Parise.
No, he got benched because of his play with the lead. DeBoer trusted him but Tedenby made two mistakes, so that was the end of that.
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines

by 






















