David Clarkson & Nick Palmieri Sparkle in New Jersey Devils 3-0 Win Over the Columbus Blue Jackets
This afternoon's game between the New Jersey Devils and the Columbus Blue Jackets was similar to the 3-0 loss the Devils suffered on Friday night against the Capitals. They heavily out-shot the opposition, they held the opposition to very few shots on net, and had the better of possession. The big, so-obvious-it-is-in-the-headline difference is that the Devils scored all the goals in this one. Today's game was an example of how good breaks are important and that without them, it's hard to win no matter how dominant a team plays. Each goal scored by the Devils was an example of this concept.
The first goal: David Clarkson was in the perfect position for the rebound Steve Mason gave up on Jacob Josefson's shot. It wasn't a horrible rebound. It was short and simply a reaction from Josefson's shot. But Clarkson was in the right place and was able to put it around Mason. The Devils did well on the cycle. Mattias Tedenby didn't lose possession along the boards, Josefon did very well to place the short where he did, and good on Clarkson to clean it up. But if the puck bounced out off Josefson's shot elsewhere, Tedenby couldn't keep the puck where it was, or Clarkson was off in his positioning, then there's no goal.
The second goal: Andy Greene puts up a fantastic pass up the boards right to Clarkson at the blueline. Clarkson has a two-on-one with Mattias Tedenby and elects to shoot. Mason stops it but he doesn't quite have all of it. Tedenby crashes the net, the puck gets loose, and Clarkson slides it in. The break there was three-fold: Mason not catching that, Tedenby (of all people) creating the chaos without taking a penalty, and Clarkson following up to put it in the net as opposed to, say, Rick Nash's skates on the goal line.
The third goal: Ilya Kovalchuk blazes up ice in the hopes to break away, but Kris Russell manages to get in his way enough to force him wide and knock an attempted shot away. Russell collects it and isn't looking up when Nick Palmieri charges in and takes it away. In one deft move, Palmieri puts it low past Mason, who appeared just as shocked. What if Russell and/or Mason were more aware of their surroundings? What if Kovalchuk held up entering the zone instead of skating ahead in the first place? We know what either didn't happen, but that goal probably does not happen if either did.
In all three cases, it wouldn't have taken a whole lot for there to be no goal scored. The old cliche is that luck is the result of hard work. Friday's game proved that cliche isn't necessarily true all the time. The Devils worked hard and got denied by a hot goalie en route to a 3-0 loss. Today, the Devils worked hard, got some breaks, and ended up with a decisive 3-0 win. Perhaps the cliche should be "Hard work only gets you so far without at least a little luck."
I have a few more thoughts on today's game after the jump. Please check out The Cannon for opinion on this game from a Columbus-supporting perspective.
The Stats: The NHL.com game summary, the NHL.com event summary, the Time on Ice Corsi Chart; the Time on Ice Head to Head Ice Time Chart
The Game Highlights: Check out the game's highlights from NHL.com, featuring a whole lot of Steve Mason as well as all three goals from the game.
David Clarkson Had A Great Game: David Clarkson has looked much better as of late playing with Mattias Tedenby and Jacob Josefson in recent games. As noted before the jump, he had two goals in the game. The first was very much an all-line effort; while the second was mostly Clarkson's effort with assists from Tedenby and Andy Greene.
Clarkson finished the night with 5 shots on net and 3 missed shots, leading the team in shot attempts with 8. One of those three misses came on a breakaway in the third period. I was really hoping that he would beat Mason to complete a hat trick, but Mason kept with him, Clarkson had to go to his backhand, and the shot was wide. He also finished a +9 in Corsi, the best among all skaters on the ice this evening. Clarkson had a great game and hopefully he'll build on it in coming games.
Nick Palmieri Also Had a Similarly Great Game: I want to know what Palmieri had for lunch today because this guy was flying all over the place. He went after Blue Jackets on the forecheck, coming away with a couple of steals. He got into positions to shoot throughout the game and put 5 on net, had one attempt blocked, and missed once. He stripped Kris Russel in his own end and scored the third goal of the game. He finished with a +6 in Corsi playing with Ilya Kovalchuk and Travis Zajac. Palmieri was great and I also hope he builds on it in the next few games.
So, How About that Defense: Unless I miscounted, Columbus didn't get it's tenth shot on net until just before 46 minutes into the game. The Blue Jackets finished the night with only 13 on net. The Devils, on the other hand, put up 31. The Devils out-shot them 9-2, 11-5, 11-6 across each of the three periods. At even strength shots, the Devils led 23-11. Needless to say, the Devils did quite well in both ends of the rink.
Inefficiency: However, the low shot total by Columbus does not mean they were pinned back as often like Washington was on Friday. The Devils, as a team, finished only a +6 in Corsi. A good value, but not a dominant +20-something value. What killed Columbus was inefficiency both in their shooting and in their attack. The inefficiency in shooting is quite obvious. With those 13 shots on net, the Blue Jackets also got blocked 13 times and missed the net 12 times. In contrast, the Devils put up 31 shots on net while being blocked 14 times and missing 12 shots. The Devils had way more attempts, but it's clear the Blue Jackets put in the effort. They just needed to be more accurate and/or selective on their shots.
This leads to the other area of inefficency, their attack. From the beginning of the game onward, I didn't get a sense that Columbus was fatigued. Everyone seemed to hustle from the start. Maybe later in the third period, they got gassed (they definitely were frustrated and discouraged). Columbus put up two forecheckers in some situations and switched from defense to offense rather quickly. The problem was that they did a lot of work in the neutral zone and in getting across the blueline only to come away with nothing too many times. Some of that is because of the Devils' defensive work to prevent even shooting attempts and forcing ill-advised attempts by the Blue Jackets. Some of it is also Columbus just not playing well in New Jersey's end of the rink.
A perfect example of both came in the third period with about 12 minutes left to play. Jakub Voracek takes the puck through the center of the neutral zone and manages to keep control despite pressure from two Devils. It's essentially a 3-on-2. Voracek makes a pass to Rick Nash, the guy you would want to get the puck to. The team's leading scorer and shooter. He had it with some speed and proceeded to fire a shot way wide. A whole lot of work for very little. That whole event pretty much summed up Columbus' game today.
(Incidentally, the Blue Jackets collected it in the corner, throw it to the point, where upon Kovalchuk knocks it away - springing himself for a breakaway where he hit the post on a backhand. Yep.)
Come to Think of It, Travis Zajac Had an Great Game Too: Travis Zajac didn't get any points, but he played quite well in his own way. He was fantastic on faceoffs, winning 9 out of 11 draws. (Aside: He and Zubrus going 6-for-7 carried the Devils to a 50+% winning percentage on faceoffs. The other centers were beaten badly.) Zajac finished a +8 in Corsi, meaning when he was out there, good things kept happening. He put up 2 shots on net and was blocked 3 times, so he definitely contributed to New Jersey's attempts. He was far better today than he was on Friday, like Palmieri.
Double-Shifting to Little Effect: While Palmieri and Zajac enjoyed a great Corsi, Kovalchuk only finished at +3. While this isn't bad and far better than any of the Elias line members, he suffered in this category because he was double-shifted a few times with the fourth line. Sometimes for Adam Mair, and sometimes for Vladimir Zharkov. It wasn't particularly effective with that fourth unit. He did his best work with Palmieri and Zajac, and for one breakaway, all by himself. Jacques Lemaire probably should have kept him to one line.
As an aside, I know he didn't score on a breakaway today either. If Kovalchuk is able to receive a pass for a breakaway or create one himself at least once a game, then that's fantastic on it's own. They'll eventually go in. That he didn't score on one today is nothing to be concerned about, in my opinion.
The Power Play: I would say the Devils did OK on the power play this evening. They drew four calls, which is great considering the team has struggled in that department all season long. They didn't score on any of them, which isn't great; but none of them killed the Devils' momentum. They managed to get some shots on Mason for each one. They ultimately finished with 8 shots on net at 5-on-4 and most were good shots coming off solid possession by the Devils. I still they need some schematic changes, but they weren't a waste of time either.
For what it's worth, they were way better than the Columbus' power play. The only penalty the Devils took was a too many men on the ice call (insert facepalm here) and the Blue Jackets did nothing with it until the final 20 seconds or so. Even then, the two shots they got on net were easily snagged by Martin Brodeur.
115: Today's game was Martin Brodeur's 115th career shutout. He didn't have to do a whole lot today, but he kept them all out like the legend that he is. Mason had a lot more to deal with (57 attempts) and could have used a lot more help.
Mixing Up the Matchups: I haven't mentioned who got matched with who because the even strength head to head ice time chart shows that no one saw a whole lot of each other. Take the Zajac line for example. They saw the top line of Rick Nash, Derick Brassard, and Jakub Voracek the most, but that was for less than 6 minutes at even strength. Not even a majority of his ice time. They saw other lines for 3-4 minutes, which makes up the difference. I guess that was Scott Arniel's idea of stemming any fatigue while not letting one unit get dominated.
Whether it was effective, I leave it up to you. Arguing against it working would be the nights Zajac, Palmieri, Clarkson, Tedenby, and two-third of the Devils defense. Arguing for it being somewhat successful would be the pairing of Henrik Tallinder (-7) and Mark Fayne (-6) along with the Elias line.
Bet You Didn't Notice This: Vladimir Zharkov finished with the following: 9:47 played, 3 shots on net, 0 Corsi (David Steckel was a -2, Adam Mair was a -5). Not a shabby night on the fourth line.
Bet You Also Didn't Notice This Too: Ethan Moreau returned from injury and played tonight. 10:35 of ice time with no shots on net, one miss. Really. He played tonight. (Correction: I thought he returned from injury. I was wrong, he was active as of late.)
Appreciation for Attacking: What I really loved seeing in today's game was that the Devils kept attacking. They didn't sit on the lead at 1-0, 2-0, or 3-0. They put up shots all game long, they kept attempting shots, and they even forced multiple breakaways. It was a far better than what they did in the last game that the Devils had a lead in the third period. They kept Columbus honest by forcing them to continue playing in their own end. They even drew a penalty a little past halfway to help the cause, and they just drove the knife into their hopes of making a game out of this one. In my opinion, the offense doing as they have been all game long did just as much to preserve the shutout as the defense did in their own end. That's excellent coaching by Lemaire and the staff to have the players keep their collective foot on the proverbial pedal, and excellent focus by the players to not take the game for granted. The result: a decisive 3-0 win.
What did you think of the Devils performance in Columbus? Did you come away pleased with Clarkson, Palmieri, and Zajac as I did after this game? Do you think the Devils will be able to build off this win? Please leave your answers along with other thoughts on tonight's game in the comments. Thanks to all of those who commented in the Gamethread, and thank you for reading.
47 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Im so glad that I made the decision to go.
I live just north of Dayton, Ohio and I was going to just watch the game on TV, but at the last second I decided to buy some tickets and drive out to Columbus for the game. It was an amazing decision. They played dominant hockey and it helped that the Blue Jackets looked terrible tonight also. I started this year with wanting to see Brodeur play once before he retired, which I accomplished in Detroit, but seeing him get a shutout was much much better. It was a great game. The Devils just need to keep doing this for the next 10 games now. haha
he’s still not a vampire
The question is not how far. The question is, do you possess the constitution, the depth of faith, to go as far as is needed? - Il Duce
team vlad
The question is not how far. The question is, do you possess the constitution, the depth of faith, to go as far as is needed? - Il Duce
by Murdoc on Mar 22, 2011 6:50 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Kovy is a Beast, not a vampire
The question is not how far. The question is, do you possess the constitution, the depth of faith, to go as far as is needed? - Il Duce
if each of the top Devils were demons, i’d say Kovalchuk is the Lord of the Flies.
in christian demonology, the Lord of the Flies (Beelzebub) was associated with the deadly sin of gluttony.
i don’t think Kovalchuk’s long contract is too long or too expensive, though it does represent a gluttonous gobbling-up of salary cap dollars. in pure terms, the contract is not gluttony but greed, which is associated with Mammon.
more fitting, though, is kovalchuk’s gluttony for beastly behavior on the ice. scoring goals, feeding assists, and generally dominating. as i recall, Beelzebub also sits second highest on the throne of the devils. Satan is the first of course.
by Alan Wright on Mar 22, 2011 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions
But Satan doesn’t play in the NHL anymore. I think he played for Boston last…coincidence?
The question is not how far. The question is, do you possess the constitution, the depth of faith, to go as far as is needed? - Il Duce
I’m actually surprised with the Devils.
They could have picked him up just for a gimmick after he was on the Cup-winning Penguins. Well, it’s that they should have done that. But, that would be funny for a second and it would sell some jerseys as well.
Next, they’ll have to send their scouts out to look for the next gimmick name. I doubt they’ll find a Jacques Lucifer in the QMJHL, but if they do they should pick him up!
by Alan Wright on Mar 22, 2011 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions
I thought it was inevitable as well. I don’t really see Lou as being the gimmick kinda guy, and very well may have specifically avoided the temptation for that specific reason, regardless of his potential contribution. To be fair, he cleared waivers, re-entry waivers and a free agency period before he went to the Dynamo, so he was probably long done with his productive years.
The question is not how far. The question is, do you possess the constitution, the depth of faith, to go as far as is needed? - Il Duce
I think your assessment is right about Lou and gimmicks.
But, the temptation was right there. So easy. Lou resisted the temptation. Satan could not overcome Lou’s steady hand.
by Alan Wright on Mar 22, 2011 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions
And Lucifer is aspect of Pride, the Morning Star, the first to be cast from heaven, or the “Devil.” Satan is the Accuser sent to test the moral fortitude of men.
I’m not prepared to assign our NJ Devils any particular Demon aspects, even though the (formerly) great Stan Lee decided to do so in his silly little NHL exercise. I prefer to look upon the other 29 teams as the sinners, and our beloved Devils as finally picking up the Archangel’s flaming sword for the second half of the season and delivering some wrath of God style vengeance upon the non-believers.
The question is not how far. The question is, do you possess the constitution, the depth of faith, to go as far as is needed? - Il Duce
I'm going to hold my tongue.
Because I actually have a lot of ideas on this topic, but this is not the forum to share them. That is, wrong time-wrong thread.
But, I like your feel for vengeance and divine retribution. The Book of Revelation is strong in this one!
by Alan Wright on Mar 22, 2011 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Bruins, here we come!
A good win for us. Anyone going to be in Boston on Tuesday? My wife and I are coming down from Maine to see the Devs cream the Bruins. GO DEVILS!
John, any updates on Zach?
John, any updates on Zach?
Nope.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Mar 20, 2011 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions
TG tweeted yesterday that he “thinks” Zach could be back in the lineup by next week. It was in response to someone’s question. Purely a guess.
DownGoesAvery. Check out the hockey blog that's shaking the world: Down Goes Avery and on Twitter (@DownGoesAvery ).
by DownGoesAvery on Mar 21, 2011 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions
I won’t be in Boston. But, you are lucky to be close to some good NCAA match-ups in Manchester this year.
I have no interest in the games in Bridgeport, CT, which isn’t too far from me.
by Alan Wright on Mar 20, 2011 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions
Sparkle? Really John? Sparkle???
Yes…I doubted…but then…upon further review:
To sparkle:
to issue in or as if in little sparks, as fire or light: The candlelight sparkled in the crystal..
to emit little sparks, as burning matter: The flames leaped and sparkled.
to shine or glisten with little gleams of light, as a brilliant gem; glitter; coruscate.
to effervesce, as wine.
to be brilliant, lively, or vivacious.
Sparkle they did.
My apologies Mr. Fischer.
I hope to join Claude Lemieux in Hell one day for a beer....
How great is it that the third line in coming together? Josefson and Tedenby are finding their place on the team, and Clarkson has begun the long climb towards earning his salary. I think he’s capable of very good hockey, he just needs to find his game consistently.
Congrats to Marty on 115. Wherever his victory and shutout totals end up, they will likely be the vrtually unbeatable gold standard. And each one in a Devils uni. Gotta love it.
1995 - 2000 - 2003
the columbus play-by-play man in the highlights package is just about the most unexciting hockey play-by-play i’ve ever heard. thank god for doc.
don’t forget to brush your teeth and thank god for chico and steve too.
PS i thought steve did a good job on the play-by-play for the Red Bull F.C. vs. Seattle Sounders season opener
by Alan Wright on Mar 21, 2011 12:52 AM EDT up reply actions
Steve does a good job. Doc got the Rags game yesterday. He was less than impressed when Cooke went all UFC with the flying elbow. Monday entertainment will be Wheel of Justice and seeing how close it is to what the League gives him for it.
The question is not how far. The question is, do you possess the constitution, the depth of faith, to go as far as is needed? - Il Duce
Doc and Steve, yes - Chico and Matt, no.
Doc Emrick is bar none the best voice in pro sports. Chico Resch sounds like he’s not watching the game half the time. Most times when a hit, call or goal is replayed, Chico says he needs to see it again. Steve is a capable fill-in, but for some reason his use of the term “fresh legs” annoys me.
Now that I live out of market and primarily catch games on wfan.com, I’m learning to dislike Matt Loughlin more and more. Very sing-songy delivery that I have a hard time listening to. I didn’t think I would like Sherry Ross on the radio side, but she is growing on me.
by MyDogsNameIsKovy on Mar 21, 2011 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions
Well, I think you’ve highlighted the difference between play-by-play annoucers and color commentary.
The pbp is the straight man, and the color man is the goofus. Think Laurel and Hardy, Abbot and Costello, Martin and Lewis, Desi and Lucy, Burns and Allen, etc. The list goes on-and-on… don’t even get me started on bi-racial buddy cop movies.
It all culminates with Doc and Chico!
+1
Just in watching the highlight package that John posted, I got bored. That announcer has no charisma and sounds like he’d rather be at the curling rink.
by MyDogsNameIsKovy on Mar 21, 2011 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions
Was perfect Devils hockey. Had to listen to the third on my XM on the drive back home from family stuffs. The Columbus announcers are terrbile. They talked about less than nothing. Brought up the Trap, boring Devils hockey, losing exciting games vs winning slow boring ones, etc. I swear, the other 29 teams need to invest in a new primer. But I guess its nice to know what to expect when listening to another teams feed.
I’m loving Clarkson on the kid’s line. He really does seem like a different player there. Maybe he needed the “mentor the young guys” or “vet presence on the kids line” to get his act together, but it worked, and the credit goes to Coach for that one. I certainly never expected it.
Kovy was an animal. Or Beast, perhaps. He was all over the place, but often looked like he was 2 steps ahead in his mind, and only one step ahead on the ice. He was flying too fast for the tired Jackets, and I think it hurt him a little. Just a quarter of a second slower to let things develop and he would have had a huge game.
Was really nice to see a win out of this sort of effort. Keep it going boys. 10 more to go.
The question is not how far. The question is, do you possess the constitution, the depth of faith, to go as far as is needed? - Il Duce
This might be pre-mature, but Palmieri’s goal…that whole sequence and forechecking reminded me of Pavel Datsyuk. Very impressive.
DownGoesAvery. Check out the hockey blog that's shaking the world: Down Goes Avery and on Twitter (@DownGoesAvery ).
I thought Steve Mason was terrific, his rebound control on David Clarkson notwithstanding. The Devils clearly had both quantity and quality of chances in their favor, and it showed on the scoreboard. Consider, however, that Kovalchuk had a full breakaway and two semi-breakaways, that Clarkson had a full breakaway of his own, that Rolston beat him cleanly only for the shot to hit the pipe…. he was good. IMO, Steve Mason was the reason this game was 3-0 and not something more like yesterday’s Montreal-Minnesota debacle.
Everything else I meant to say has already been said elsewhere in this thread or up above in the article.
Fayne
By no means the ‘big’ story last night, but I have to admit I am very pleased with his comfort level out there. A few times I saw Nash trying to be himself and power through the defense with the puck, only to have Fayne cooly take the body and strip him of the puck. Even against the toughest opponents he seems very relaxed. Just thought he was worth mentioning.
That aside, Clarkie and Palmieri played great and Marty continues to make himself even more untouchable.
I admit a liking for Fayne also, however he seems to be good for one or two potentially game-changing screw-ups per game.
Hopefully it’s something that can be corrected with experience and coaching and isn’t indicative of something more detrimental like an inability to stay focused.
What a shame. Even when Fayne plays well and is comfortable, we’re still watching for the screw-ups!
On the other hand, if he stays with the organization, Lou and Loumaire will iron out those wrinkles with an iron fist.
He makes mistakes but hardly consistently costs the team. I think he had a rough past few games and now everyone is ready to jump on him for every mistake.

by 






















