New Jersey Devils Fall to the Boston Bruins 4-1
On Monday, I wrote a post about how incredible the New Jersey Devils have played in this second half of the season. I still implore all the Devils fans who have read it or will read it to heed the title and appreciate what they have done so far. A 24-5-2 record alone commands such respect. In retrospect, I wish I went a little more at length on how many of those 24 wins were close games, ones where the Devils tied it up in the third period en route to a win. They weren't necessarily the better team in each of those 24 victories, just that they got results.
More recently, the Devils have been the better team in their last three games and only one of them. There's something to be said for how valuable a good bounce or a hot goaltender can be, depending on what side of the result you're on.
Tonight was a more even competition than any of those three games, though. The Devils came out and beat the Bruins all over the ice, yet the first period ended 1-1. The Bruins pounded the Devils throughout the second and went ahead by only one goal, 2-1. This was a familiar situation for New Jersey. Not winning going into the third and needing to at least equalize to keep hopes of a win alive. While the Devils seemingly put the effort in the third period to try and tie it up. To do what they have been doing so often within the last two months.
Only, tonight, it didn't happen. And with less than 4 minutes left, Milan Lucic essentially sealed the win with a one-timer in the slot. Martin Brodeur had no chance at it. Worse, it came on a rush just after a one-timer attempt by Ilya Kovalchuk was re-directed wide instead of blasted past Tim Thomas' right side. Even watching it on TV, I felt it was in slow-motion. The attempt going awry certainly wasn't Kovalchuk's fault as it was a bad bounce off a hard pass. And how Boston just slid in for one great chance is as much of the fault of the skaters on the ice as it was a great shot from Lucic. Certainly it was deflating. While Jacques Lemaire pulled Brodeur late in the hopes for a miracle (it didn't happen, Mark Recchi scored an empty net goal), it likely wasn't going to occur - and it didn't.
It sucks real bad in how it went down, but in the bigger picture, it was bound to happen. The Devils have done it so many times to other teams that the law of averages suggest a few are going to go against New Jersey. So it did in Boston.
I have a few more thoughts on tonight's game after the jump. For a Bruins' based perspective on the game, please check out Stanley Cup of Chowder.
The Stats: The NHL.com game summary, the NHL.com event summary, the Time on Ice Corsi chart; the Time on Ice Head to Head Ice Time chart.
The Game Highlights: From NHL.com, here's a video of all of the highlights from tonight's loss:
Kovalchuk Did His Job: I don't think anyone would argue otherwise, but I figure I should point out what he did. He scored the Devils' lone goal, a beautiful one-timer from Mattias Tedenby on the power play. He also put 6 shots on Thomas, leading the team in that category.
The Zajac line did well in terms of possession, as Kovalchuk (+7 Corsi), Travis Zajac (+5), and Nick Palmieri (+5) put up the best values among all New Jersey forwards. Kovalchuk was double-shifted with Jacob Josefson (-4) and Mattias Tedenby (-5) and still came out as the best Devils skater at Corsi. Plus, Kovalchuk saw the Zdeno Chara (-3 Corsi) and Johnny Boychuk (-5) pairing the most along with the David Krejci line and still came out ahead. On top of all this, he was the only Devil to take a faceoff and have a winning percentage over 50%. OK, he was 1-for-1, but every other draw-taker for New Jersey finished at 50% or worse tonight.
Simply put, I feel he had a great game. I wish he scored late in the third as well. I'm sure he wishes he scored as well. The loss is certainly not his fault. If anything, without him, this goes down as a shutout for Tim Thomas.
Brodeur Also Did His Job: Two of the three goals that beat him were on one-timers at close range, one on his flank. The other one - the first one - was a deflection by Shawn Thornton on a Dennis Seidenberg shot. I don't think the goalie can be faulted on either. It's disappointing that all three happened because Brodeur had a very busy night. Early on, he didn't, but he was shelled in the second period. 17 shots against, and at least 7 on the 4 power plays Boston had in that period alone. Brodeur had to stack the pads a few times, fight through screens to get stops, and deal with several scrums in front of him to prevent a jammed puck getting into the net. Like his counterpart at the opposite rink, Brodeur played as well as one could expect. The Bruins just had the better opportunities.
Why This Game Was Even: The Devils owned the first 14 minutes of the game, holding Boston to a mere two shots on net, shotless on a powerplay, and putting 16 of their own even with a power play goal. You couldn't ask for more. Then Thornton deflected a puck in, Boston looked more lively. Still, the first ended 16-6 in shots in favor of NJ. The Bruins really took it to the Devils in the second period; they made the most of their four power plays, took the lead, and finished the period 17-8 in shots. So how about that third period?
7-7 in shots! Ultimately, the Devils finished at +1 as a team in Corsi. Just +1. While the Devils may have seemed like they were the ones going forward more often than not (and understandably so, they were down a goal), New Jersey just didn't get enough on Thomas. The Bruins attacked a little more on the counter than I thought and ultimately made the most on one of their rushes to double their lead.
The game finished 31-30 in shots in favor of NJ. While the Devils had a 27-20 lead at even strength shots, attempts were only 35-34 in favor of the visitors. Incidentally, the Bruins actually made more attempts than New Jersey: 47-41. This game may have felt like the losses to Ottawa and Washington from last week, but in reality, the Bruins played closely with New Jersey in terms of shots and possession and came out winners. They fully deserved their win.
What Undercut the Devils: What allowed Boston to really control the second period were power plays. The Devils took four minors and all of them were avoidable calls. Mark Fayne hooked Michael Ryder across his waist to start the period. Nick Palmieri tripped up Zdeno Chara on a forecheck right in front of a ref. David Steckel hit Zach Boychuk away from the play. Dainius Zubrus smothered Andrew Ference with his right arm while chasing down a dumped-in puck. The Zubrus penalty was the dumbest of the four taken in the second by far. I wanted to throw something when he pulled that off. Surely, Big Z knows that type of a swim move isn't a hockey play (it's something defensive linemen use, IIRC). Palmieri's was the most costly as Chara dropped in on the Devils' flank to fire a one-timer past Brodeur for the 2-1 lead.
While Boston only cashed in on one of them they took the opportunity to put up 10 shots on net, take the lead, and keep New Jersey from going on offense. That they got 8 shots in the period despite playing 6:07 down a man isn't too bad. But it allowed Boston to take the lead.
Coincidentally, only Fayne among those four players can I really say had a solid game. Fayne finished at a +6 in Corsi, put 5 shots on net, had a shot deflected on net by David Clarkson that hit the pipe, and did well against Patrice Bergeron's line. While he finished a +3 in Corsi, Zubrus took two avoidable minors in the game and registered no shots on net. His only contribution? Getting hooked by Mark Recchi in the first period, which led to the Devils' lone goal tonight. Palmieri did at least put 2 shots on net and had a +5 in Corsi, but he wasn't much of a factor. He did not build on his awesome game against Columbus on Sunday. Steckel went 4-for-9 at the dot and while the fourth line was on it's way to finishing positive in Corsi after the first two periods, they still went negative. Steckel finished at -2.
Oh, David: While Clarkson did have a nice deflection on a Fayne shot that beat Thomas but not the iron, Clarkson had a poor night. The third line of him, Josefson, and Tedenby were getting pinned back from the start of the game. Lemaire identified Clarkson as someone to move to allow Kovalchuk to be double-shifted with the kids. While the rookies still didn't do much (Tedenby did a call tonight), Clarkson did even worse next to Adam Mair and Steckel. Mair and Steckel were on their way to finishing positive in Corsi, allowing us to have proof that they were OK. Clarkson dragged them down as he finished at -9 in Corsi, the worst on NJ. The only positive I can say about Clarkson's performance was that at least he didn't take a penalty.
They Got the One: We can call the power play a success of sorts because they scored a goal. Rather quickly too. On the other hand, their second power play generated only one shot on net (a really good one from Kovalchuk) and not much else. Still, 1 conversion out of 2 is progress for this team.
Yes and No: Such is the answer to the question, "Did the Elias line have a good game?" In terms of possession, they just finished above zero: Patrik Elias and Brian Rolston were each a +1 and Zubrus was a +3. They were caught with no one in the slot for Lucic for his third goal. Yet, the line did get some offense going, with Elias and Rolston putting up 3 shots apiece. Plus, based on the head to head ice time charts, Claude Julien mixed up who went out against that line. Perhaps that was in response to dealing with the Zajac line, but it's a sign that they may have given him some problems. Ultimately, they were in the middle. I leave it to you, the reader, to determine where exactly in that middle they were in. All the same, they could have done better tonight.
The Best Bruin (Skater) on the Ice: Chara's Corsi may have been negative, but he otherwise had a great night. He had the eventual game winning goal, drew the penalty that led to the aforementioned GWG, he got 4 shots on net (tied with Recchi for team lead tonight), he didn't fracture anyone's vertebra, and had the secondary assist on the Lucic goal and the game-icing Recchi goal. 24:27 of work, mostly against a rather inspired Kovalchuk this evening, and he didn't come out too badly along with the production. I felt that behind Thomas, he was the best Bruin on the ice.
In Place of Zharkov: Zharkov was scratched in favor of Rod Pelley getting into the lineup. While Pelley didn't do too badly - 1 SOG, a +2 in Corsi playing next to Mair and Steckel - he only got 6:41 of ice time, 5:45 at even strength. I can support him sitting for Kovalchuk to get double-shifted. Kovalchuk was playing well, after all. Besides, it's not going to hurt Pelley to play such limited minutes as it might for Zharkov. Though considering how poorly Clarkson was playing, I wish in retrospect that Lemaire played Pelley in place of #23 when he was dropped to the fourth line.
Regression May Come, But Not Tonight: While Boston's offense certainly ensure tonight's win, it wouldn't have been possible without Tim Thomas. Thomas made a lot of tough stops in the first period, didn't get complacent in the second period, and made a couple of important saves in the third - notably robbing Kovalchuk on a slapshot on New Jersey's second power play of the night. I'm still skeptical about the sustainability of a 94% save percentage, but after tonight, I can see why he has so far. Thomas was great when he had to keep his team in the game and when he had to preserve the lead.
One Final Point: The Devils really needed to put up more than 7 on Thomas in the third period, particularly when down by a goal. Boston did a good job digging in deep and forcing as much of the game as possible to be played along the boards. This forced the Devils to expend their energy there as opposed to controlling the puck and looking for open men for shots. The tactic worked well, but in retrospect, the Devils really needed to be more desperate with their shot selection later in the period. Even long shots would have worked, they were getting through. After all Fayne got 5 shots on goal and, somehow, Colin White got 3 shots on goal (yeah, that Colin White).
Of course, I would want the Devils to not be in the situation where they need an equalizer at all. That said, I hope they'll do better next time. It won't be easy, what with it being in Pittsburgh and all.
What do you think the Devils should do differently for their next two road games (a back-to-back set) to win them? What would you have done with Clarkson tonight? Do you think other forwards not named Kovalchuk will have a big performance in the next few games? Please leave your answers and other thoughts on tonight's game in the comments. Thanks to all of the commentators and thanks for reading. And remember: appreciate what was accomplished as it cannot be taken away - only forgotten.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Once again Jacques boggles my mind!!
With 7:30 to go when they were only down by one he put the fourth line out (clarkson, mair, and steckel). with 5 and change left he did it again, and right after the third boston goal, he put them out their once again, just like he did in the washington game, although that one was worse because they were put out there for offensive zone faceoffs. If you can double shift one guy, why not double shift a whole line? or just use three lines down the stretch? i wrote this in the washington writeup and people responded that a player cant play 60 minutes. im not saying play 60 minutes, im saying with like 10 minutes to go, why not just go with a three line rotation so you can have the most skilled players out there? your losing, and while the fourth line may be positive in corsi, in reality they dont provide as good of chance of scoring as one of the other three lines might.
also wanted to say im not surprised the devils lost more faceoffs, boston has some of the better faceoff guys in the league.
by poopydoodie11 on Mar 22, 2011 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions
tough game
Honestly, I thought this was the first game in awhile that the other team just outplayed the devils…the loses to the senators and caps were tough, but this one was, in my opinion, one of their worst games in awhile. After we scored that first goal, it just seemed like Boston became much more aggressive and physical and really took the play to our zone. The reason why we took so many penalties in the second was because we were chasing and losing battles on the boards.
I agree that Clarkson had a tough game, but I still hope to see that line have more good games than bad and it would really make things exciting for next year knowing we have a potentially strong third line possibility.
I also think that this game and a lot of the other recent games have really hammered down the fact that this team absolutely needs Parise. I am not talking about this year, but he needs to be a part of this teams long term future.
In terms of the next two games, I think the devils have to keep on pushing and playing hard. This game turned when we started taking a lot of penalties and the fact that we don’t do that often makes me think the next game will be a lot different. Stay out of the box and we will be ok.
I should clarify that I felt boston out played us starting after we dominated them for the first 10 to 15 min of the game…if we had scored another goal afer outshooting them 16-4 or whatever it was at one point, this game would have ended differently.
by TexasDevilFan on Mar 23, 2011 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions
So my question is did we beat ourselves tonight or were we beat by a better team. I think the latter happened and that’s alright. We didn’t play a bad game at all besides the second period.
So my question is did we beat ourselves tonight or were we beat by a better team?
I’d lean more towards the former and less towards the latter: I thought the Devils played the Bruins even, more or less. It was all those stupid penalties that really hurt the team — plus the inability to draw a few in return — especially since they were all obvious calls and there aren’t legitimate complaints about referee bias. John wrote an article about this not too long ago, and pretty much what he said there applied to last night. Particularly Zubrus, who took two of the calls in question (and I thought could have been called for two separate obstruction-type infractions on that second call, as he hindered both Boston defenders chasing the puck IMO)…. and that’s been an issue with him a fair amount this season.
Tim Thomas was good, too. I made mention in the preview thread that Boston’s defense had been leaky during their down stretch and I felt they were due for a bounceback. Alas, I was correct…. but too often this season the Devils have made opposing goalies look better than they otherwise are.
(Not so) Fun Fact for Today: Do you realize the Devils haven’t played a regular season game without being in contention for a playoff spot (or having already clinched said playoff spot) since the end of the 1988-1989 season? Even when they missed the playoffs in 1995-1996, they were alive until they lost on the final day of the regular season.
On the fun fact – if the Devils can restart their winning ways and Buffalo, Toronto, and Carolina can lose simply their share of games, it could still come down to the last game. Not very likely due to the current deficit, but still quite possible. As long as the Devils can get wins, their earliest possible elimination date keeps moving out. (Currently 3/29 – I track this on my death watch page now as well.)
Go Devils Playoff Death Watch
"Hope Is a Good Thing, Maybe the Best of Things, and No Good Thing Ever Dies." - Andy Dufresne – The Shawshank Redemption
Go Jets
And I think its kinda interesting too in that if the Devils are able to make up five points over there next seven games to buffalo and carolina’s eight games, then we could go into the final weekend of the season 4 points back of the last playoff spot, knowing that if whatever teams ahead of us lose on saturday night and we beat the rangers, we go into sunday with a win and clinch scenario since it looks like we would wind up winning any tiebreakers based on non-shootout wins.
by TexasDevilFan on Mar 23, 2011 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions
This 4 game road trip is a killer. I never expected them to sweep. Its asking too much.
Win the next 2, and maybe get a few breaks and then we’re back in it.
Do I expect to make the playoffs? No. Do I still think these last 9 will be interesting?
Oh HELL Yes!
Boston has our # this year. Lets hope the last time we play them actually means something for us, because I doubt it will for them.
na-na-na-na HEY! You SUCK!!
Something that bothers me
Colin White and Anton Volchenkov are still getting the short end of the stick in terms of distribution of ice time. Volchenkov played 16:03 last night (about 12-13 minutes of which was even-strength)…. or less than everyone other than the third and fourth forward lines (Clarkson-Josefson-Tedenby, Pelley-Steckel-Mair). By way of comparison, Anssi Salmela played 19:49 last night (and 19:27 of that at even strength).
I know White/Volchenkov doesn’t have a ton of offensive upside, and that Greene/Salmela draws bigger minutes for that reason. Still, on a night Boston is pushing this team back and turning Marty Brodeur into a shooting gallery, can we have a little more even distribution of ice time? Why the (self-censored) did we give Anton Volchenkov all this money if he’s going to rot on the bench?
tonight was yet another night where the faceoffs were in boston’s end. the faceoffs were 17-9 o-zone/d-zone. when that number is reversed, you will see volchenkov get 20 minutes.
Is Anssi Salmela really deserving of that much ice-time in any situation? Is there any particular reason why Lemaire couldn’t put out Greene/White or Greene/Volchenkov in some of those offensive zone draws instead of Greene/Salmela, beyond the reasoning that he “wouldn’t want to disrupt the defensive pairings”? (Nevermind the fact that Salmela doesn’t play on the PK, but Greene does…. and you’d have some changes in defensive pairings as a result)
A series of numbers to ponder:
Anssi Salmela’s NHL career: 4-15-19 in 103 games (one point roughly every 5.5 games)
Anssi Salmela’s Devils’ career: 2-9-11 in 65 games (one point roughly every 6 games)
Colin White this year: 0-6-6 in 68 games (one point roughly every 11 games)
Colin White’s NHL career: 20-105-125 in 742 games (one point roughly every 6 games)
Anton Volchenkov this year: 0-8-8 in 55 games (one point roughly every 7 games)
Anton Volchenkov’s NHL career: 16-86-102 in 483 games (one point roughly every 5 games)
Salmela is a minus-9 this year. White is a minus-2, and Volchenkov is a plus-3 this season.
I believe you’ve made the argument that Salmela gains tremendous benefit from zone starts when compared to White and/or Volchenkov. When I look at the numbers I’ve posed above, I see a guy whose offensive production isn’t significantly greater than either White or Volchenkov. When I’ve started parsing things through BehindTheNet, I see a lousy relative Corsi, too.
So what exactly is Anssi Salmela bringing to this Devils team and their defensive corps that deserves such robust minutes that could be given to other players?
Points per game for defensemen is a pretty atrocious metric to determine who’s better offensively, for the following reasons:
A: ice time. White and Volchenkov have typically been 18 minute a game guys, Salmela, not so much.
B: overall quality of team. Even strength points, especially assists, by defensemen are largely random events; by defensive defensemen, more so. They tend to rise and fall with team offense. White and Volchenkov have both played on excellent offenses that they had little hand in. Salmela has not.
C: specific quality of team. Colin White spent at least one year of his career playing with Scott Niedermayer. Anssi Salmela’s best partner in the NHL is probably Andy Greene.
D: luck. Salmela hasn’t had all that much time in the NHL.
If we really wanted to get a sense of how good Salmela was offensively in relation to White or Volchenkov, we’d have to look at Goals For On Ice/Goals For Off Ice, Shots For On Ice/Shots Against On Ice and Quality of Teammates and Quality of Competition metrics. Even that might not give us a true answer.
If you’re wondering why Lemaire doesn’t split up the White/Volchenkov pairing and the Greene/Salmela pairing, I don’t really have any idea. But surely you can see how a negative Corsi player could provide more offense than a positive Corsi one.
That's the difference
between Boston and the Devils. The shots were pretty close and the checking was very close, but they had a very difficult time finishing. And that’s the difference between the Devils and a team in the top 8. I couldn’t find the hits from that game, but Boston definetly played more physical. Another reason why the Devils lost this game.
After the first period Boston played that game as if it were a playoff game and the Devils were holding on. Especially in the second period. They outhit, won more faceoffs, drew more calls and were outshot by 1 despite leading from the second period on.
As someone stated earlier this shows the Devils NEED Parise. They just lack speed moving forward with they’re forwards and defensemen. They also lack finishers
I still believe

by 





















