Let's Discuss the Post-July 1st Salary Cap Situation for the New Jersey Devils
Yesterday opened up unrestricted free agency in the NHL, and the New Jersey Devils kept somewhat quiet with only two signings. They re-signed defenseman Andy Greene to a 4 year, $12 million contract and they re-signed goaltender Johan Hedberg to a 1 year, $1.25 million contract. Regardless what you may feel about either of those signings, they're now on New Jersey's cap for better or worse. As of right now, that may be the extent of their forays into unrestricted free agency, because of their salary cap situation and roster space.
According to Cap Geek, the Devils now have $7,872,500 of cap space. This may seem like plenty of space, except for the reality that the Devils have Zach Parise and their other restricted free agents left to re-sign. Most of this remaining space will be taken up by those players. Zach Parise won't be re-signed cheaply, and while the other restricted free agents will get cheap deals, they can add up. After the jump, I'll show how much it's could cost to re-sign the other RFAs assuming it's at the price of their qualifying offers and how the Devils' salary cap situation really looks with that in mind. I will say that it's definitely going to draw Lou's hand to making a trade or two, something he's already alluded to the press yesterday.
The Non-Zach Parise RFAs
Most Devils fans are interested to find out when Zach Parise will be re-signed and for how much. I can understand that, as he's the team's top forward and will have a significant impact on their cap. However, I'm going to work from the other way around. The Devils qualified 9 restricted free agents last Monday and generally when a team qualifies a RFA, they're going to be re-signed in some capacity. Their collective cap hit will also have to be considered on top of what Parise will get.
I've touched on this before back in May, but it's worth re-doing now due to a couple of changes. First, Zach Parise's not on this list because he has been elected to arbitration by the Devils. He did not need to be qualified, and again, I'm more interested in the other players. Second, Anssi Salmela was considered back in May but he isn't now since he wasn't qualified. Instead, he's now unrestricted free agent. The Devils don't have to sign him at all, if they don't want to. Third, while he was qualified, Alexander Vasyunov has signed a one year deal with Lokomotiv Yaroslavl of the KHL as confirmed last Monday by Tom Gulitti. Since only an offer is needed to keep his rights, I'm going to assume the Devils will not have to sign him to a contract - and so he won't. Therefore, Vasyunov isn't on the following list, knocking it down to eight players.
Assuming the following players sign a contract worth their minimum qualifying offer, this is how much the Devils will have to pay out to keep all eight remaining RFAs.
| Devils RFA | Contract at Q.O. |
| Vladimir Zharkov | $671,000 |
| Matthew Corrente | $660,000 |
| Mark Fraser | $550,000 |
| Matt Taormina | $561,000 |
| Jeff Frazee | $605,000 |
| Nathan Perkovich | $566,500 |
| Maxim Noreau | $660,000 |
| Steven Zalewski | $550,000 |
This is a total of $4,823,500 - not an insignificant amount of money. Fortunately, all of that definitely won't be on New Jersey's salary cap. Most of these contracts will have to be two-way deals and most of these players will be in the AHL with Albany in 2011-12 - where they won't affect New Jersey's cap.
Speculating on Future Cap Space Available
The following will include a lot of assumptions, so be forewarned. First: Let's assume the Devils don't sign any more unrestricted free agents. This may be true, since the Devils really don't need to do so after Greene and Hedberg. Second, let's also assume Adam Larsson and any other non-professional prospects are signed by New Jersey. Larsson could command quite a bit of coin based on what other #4 overall picks have received in the past, and that would throw a wrench into New Jersey's plans for 2011-12, anyway.
Since the Devils are set at goaltender with Martin Brodeur and the retained Hedberg, Jeff Frazee will be in Albany for another season. The Devils only have 11 forwards on the books, and if we assume Parise will be retained, then we can assume they'll have 12 forwards by the start of the season. I can see the Devils having a spare forward, and if so, they'll go with Vladimir Zharkov over Nathan Perkovich or career minor-leaguer Steven Zalewski. Lastly, with the re-signing of Andy Greene (and assuming Jay Leach is Albany bound), the Devils have 6 defensemen already. They'll have an open regular spot Bryce Salvador can not return (more on that later). For the purposes of depth (and assuming they only keep 13 forwards on the roster), New Jersey can pick two of Matt Taormina, Maxim Noreau, Mark Fraser, and Matthew Corrente, and leave it at that. Of course, I'm assuming these players alone will get roster spots - if someone else from the system comes up and gets a spot, then their cap
My point is that, at most, 3 of these 8 players will be on New Jersey's cap. If we assume those three will carry the highest qualifying offers - Zharkov, Corrente, and Noreau - then the actual cap space New Jersey needs to retain is $1,991,000 from these other RFAs. Adjust accordingly based on who stays with the big club. I don't think the Devils will go with a full 23 man roster from opening night onward; though I can see them keeping a spare forward and defenseman early on - knocking it down to a potential maximum of $1,331,000 (again, assuming it's Zharkov and one of Corrente or Noreau).
Continuing the thought experiment, going with 3 of these RFAs on the roster would leave $5,881,500 in cap space for Zach Parise. I don't know a thing about the current negotiations between New Jersey and Parise. Given that Patrik Elias has a cap hit of $6 million and Ilya Kovalchuk has a $6.67 million cap hit; I'm very doubtful the Devils can keep Parise for a lower cap hit of either player.
Reconsidering Assumptions, Or How the Devils Can Create More Space Without A Trade
The above is with several assumptions at play. The Devils do have some options to create more breathing room under the salary cap ceiling. The first is to do nothing. During the summer, teams are allowed to go over the salary cap by 10%. So the Devils effectively have another $6.43 million to play around with. I do not recommend this option at all, however, because all it does is put off an incredibly difficult decision. While any team can go over the cap now, everyone has to be below the salary cap ceiling in mid-September. Teams that go over the limit have to dump salary some way and will have no leverage in any last-minute deals to get compliant with the cap. The Devils were in this spot in 2006 and effectively dumped Vladimir Malakhov and their first round pick just to get under. I don't have to see a repeat of that, and I hope the Devils' management will try to avoid it again.
The second is to only go over the cap by $2.9 million at most. This number is not something I just threw out there. It's Bryce Salvador's cap hit. Salvador's health remains as a question mark. He didn't play at all last season, and it's questionable whether he'll play this season. If he's not medically cleared to play, the Devils can put him on long term injured reserve. That will allow the Devils to go over the cap by $2.9 million and remain compliant. This is a risky proposition, as it's reliant on Salvador's health. I don't know the man, but I don't think he won't do everything possible to try and play in 2011-12.
The third is to throw out our assumption about keeping players up for depth. Keeping only Zharkov - the most expensive qualifying offer - in New Jersey will mean there's $7,201,500. That may be enough to retain Parise, but it will likely put the Devils right up against the cap ceiling for the season. As injuries and other issues happen (e.g. Devils needing to meet another need), this becomes a problem.
Let's go to the other limit and have none of these 8 other RFAs up on the New Jersey roster. These players will only count on New Jersey's cap if they're in New Jersey and all of them have spent time in Albany. They can all just be signed, sent down to the AHL, and that would leave all of this remaining cap space ($7,872,500) for Parise. If Salvador can come back play D next season, then the Devils have a full roster. At forward, this is not a big deal. Zharkov could take Vasyunov's spot on the roster, even though I think he'd be better suited in the NHL. However, this creates a nightmare of a roster problem for Albany's blueline. Albany already has 6 defensemen on their books, adding another 4 on top of Jay Leach is way too many defenders for one team.
On top of all of that, you have to figure that some of these players may not want two-way deals. They want the security of a one-way deal; increasing the actual salary they'll receive regardless of where they will play. Throw in waiver issues, which will make recalling some of these players more difficult. The more I thin about it, this option becomes more complicated it is and less attractive. What does become more attractive is the trade router.
The Trade Option
This is the best way for New Jersey to make cap space for Parise, the other RFAs, and to do so without being right up at the salary cap ceiling for another season.
I have two perspectives on how the Devils should approach a trade. I've covered the salary perspective back in May. Basically, if the Devils can find someone to take Brian Rolston, Dainius Zubrus, or David Clarkson, then this option must be explored. Each takes up a significant portion of the cap and just moving one of them out will create enough space to accomplish the above goal. With 6 teams still under the salary cap floor by at least $3 million, I would think there would be interested parties in taking a bad contract. From a roster perspective, some defensemen need to be shipped out of New Jersey. The Devils absolutely do not need as many professional defensemen on their reserve list as they do. I think the Devils can kill two birds with one stone.
In order to make the salary dump work, usually the team doing the dumping has to include a decent asset. Since the Devils have loads of young defensemen with some potential, the Devils should consider packaging the player with a bad contract with a prospective defender. You may not want to part with Eric Gelinas or Brandon Burlon or Matthew Corrente, but if that's what makes a trade happen, then you have to pull that trigger. Among all the prospects, the only ones I wouldn't consider trading are Adam Larsson (the #4 pick in 2011 is off the table) and Alexander Urbom (I think he's got a shot make the roster this season, why move him now?).
In return, the Devils should ideally look for picks and prospects in return. These are usually assets that do not add to the team's salary cap right away, which is the whole point of making a trade at this juncture. Adding to the overall salary cap would defeat the purpose of making a deal with another team.
Conclusion
It wouldn't surprise me if there are some other outs and other means to get cap space, but it's looking like Lou didn't just reference the possibility of a trade just to create rumors. From my perspective, I would be surprised if none was made this summer. Playing around between $5.8 to $7.8 million is possible to keep the RFAs and re-sign Parise (except at the lower ends), but it doesn't leave a lot of room by the time the season begins. It's to New Jersey's advantage to make some more space.
What do you think the Devils will do in the coming weeks? Do you think they'll make a trade at all? If so, do you think they'll do it before or after Parise gets re-signed? Who do you want to see traded and to whom? Please leave your answers and other thoughts on the Devils' cap situation in this offseason in the comments. Thanks for reading.
60 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think since months Clarkson will be traded to Montreal, they’ve been brutalized by the B’s last year, & Clarkie is the type of player they need to add in their line-up. & last but not least, “Les partisans” seem to really, really like David Clarkson.
"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"
Why would Montreal be the least bit interested in David Clarkson? I can think of several reasons why they’d hang up the phone as soon as Lou Lamorello mentions his name:
- Montreal is already getting close to the upper limit. They have no need to add salary.
- Montreal has a number of similar players. By “similar”, I mean Bottom 6 forwards who can skate a little, hit a little, fight a little, and even score a little. Someone like Travis Moen comes to mind.
- Montreal just gave a lot of years and a lot of money to Eric Cole. Cole does just about everything Clarkson does, only he does it a lot better (when healthy). Cole scores more, hits more, plays more, is more of a handful for opposing defenses…. and far more capable of skating in a Top 6 role.
Your best hope of dumping David Clarkson would lie with teams below the salary cap floor who need to add payroll, and young re-building teams where Clarkson might fit in and grow into a more prominent role.
1st
MTL still has more than $8 millions in cap-space, if MONTREAL doesn’t trade/sign/deal to improve the team with at least $6 millions of their $8 millions, we’ve to be ready for Riot on St Catherine 2.0.
2nd
Erik Cole, just for last year, means 50 pts, scoring 26 goals, he was the 3rd best goalscorer on the Canes, his cap-hit is about $4.5 millions now & he’s a LW (shoots left).
Clarkie’s making 2.6 millions with 30 pts as career best (beloved by all at this time) & he’s a right-handed RW.
Your comparison makes any sense, at this price for sure Cole is a better player, but they could be paired on the same line without any problem.
3rd
Clarkson’s had a bad season, nonetheless he’s still well appreciated in the league, a bit overrated I’d say, but you’re talking about Clarkson like he was a piece of filth, it’s a bit strong if you ask me.
Almost forgot, actually it was just my opinion, Whatever Lou will do, really I won’t complain.
"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"
by Elektrostal_Kid on Jul 2, 2011 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Montreal isn’t very close to the upper limit and Clarkson definitely fills a need. I wouldn’t be surprised if he ended up there. Travis Moen is worse than Clarkson for sure.
Moen’s better defensively, Clarkson’s better offensively. And Moen can at least stay vertical on the ice.
Hell on Ice/In Lou We Trust/Twitter
Talking toilet, you may call me Jane.
by Kevin Sellathamby on Jul 3, 2011 7:56 AM EDT up reply actions
I also think Montreal is closer to the Upper Limit than the raw numbers would imply, when one considers they have a pair of RFAs to get under contract to new deals (Ryan White and Josh Gorges will probably be on the 23-man roster; their combined cap hit last season was just under $2 million). There’s no reason for Montreal to spend all the way to the Upper Limit when they could simply hold some space for in-season acquisitions.
I’ve already explained above why I don’t think Clarkson fills a need. David Clarkson may be better than Travis Moen …. he may be a lot better than Travis Moen, but Moen is cheaper and has less term on his contract. Even if Max Pacioretty isn’t healthy, I don’t see how Clarkson is much of an upgrade for them. The wings on their top two lines will probably be filled by Cole, Gionta, Cammalleri and Kostitsyn, so is Clarkson really much of a value for them as a third-liner as opposed to Pacioretty (if healthy) or Moen?
….
I imagine the Canadiens’ GM will put much of his effort into trying to move Scott Gomez and his contract at this point. Unless you’re interested in bringing Gomez back to NJ (and Scott is interested in waiving his NTC to let it happen), I don’t see why there would be any substantive trade talks.
Montreal signed Gio and traded for Gomez. They might as well just start collecting Devils and become Jersey North.
Hell on Ice/In Lou We Trust/Twitter
Talking toilet, you may call me Jane.
by Kevin Sellathamby on Jul 3, 2011 7:56 AM EDT up reply actions
I would be really pissed if we traded Clarkson.
We could bury Salvador or move Zubrus and both would open up more space than trading Clarkson and you would be losing less potential production. Am I the only one here that thinks a player that has the ability and talent to score 20 goals in a season and kick the crap out of someone is worth the money that he is getting?
There is nothing quite as satisfying as out running security after you've punched out a Flyers fan!
"I was in the moment, and the moment said smack you." - Bruce Willis
I like Clarkie, but he is replaceable. I think Zubrus brings more value to the team due to his size, skating, board work and versatility. Clarkson had an opportunity to establish himself as a top 9 forward last season and couldn’t stay off the 4th line. He looked good with JJ and Teddy for a few games but he was too inconsistent IMO.
I agree on Zubrus
To me, he’s been an essential part of the team. Clarkson is an up-and-down guy who looks like Randy McKay at times and then other times he’s completely invisible. Zubrus, even when he isn’t providing offense, seems to be going 100 percent most of the time and he’s an excellent forechecker who adds to any line he’s on.
by Tyler Bleszinski on Jul 2, 2011 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Rec'd
Well said.
What you fail to understand in your joyless myopia is that baseball is the key to life-- the Rosetta Stone, if you will. If you just understood baseball better all your other questions your, your... the, uh... the aliens, the conspiracies they would all, in their way be answered by the baseball gods.
Even if I personally think keeping a guy like Zubrus is better than Clarkson for the Devils, (I don’t wanna argue wtih you about them, I respect your opinion) Clarkie is definitely a more attractive player for the league, younger, pts scorer, dropping the glove & making less money.
"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"
by Elektrostal_Kid on Jul 2, 2011 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions
I understand your point and see it as a very reasonable conclusion. My concern, however, is who we would replace the players with. In my mind, Zubrus could be replaced by Josefson or Henrique on the 2nd/3rd lines. Clarkson’s replacement, if done in the system, would be Sestito or PL3, and I know how much everyone here loves those guys. (Personally, I like Tim Sestito and would rather have an offensively challenged player that is responsible and doesn’t make huge, horrible mistakes that lead to goals against. As far as Leblond goes, there is a soft spot in my heart for him.)
There is nothing quite as satisfying as out running security after you've punched out a Flyers fan!
"I was in the moment, and the moment said smack you." - Bruce Willis
Fair points, I really see nowt that it would be hard to replace Clarkson, indeed.
But overall, trading Clarkson would just mean the opportunity to sign Zach Parise long-term, Clarkie would be missed but you can’t make an omelette without breaking eggs, especially with our cap situation.
"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"
by Elektrostal_Kid on Jul 2, 2011 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m not sure if we would have to give up another defensive prospect unless it is actually a hockey trade as opposed to a salary dump. As much as we aren’t fans of the Clarkson and Zubrus contracts, these players can actually contribute to a NHL team and while they are both overpaid, their salaries are not the albatross that a Brian Campbell or Brian Rolston deal brings. While teams might be willing to give up more than a draft pick for one of these guys , I think they do bring enough value to not have to throw in a prospect to sweeten the deal.
Judging by CapGeek it looks like the Isles, Coyotes, Jets and maybe Avs will have to take on money just to get to the floor. The only advantage they have is that these teams will probably have several options as to which bad contact(s) they want to take on. I could see Clarkson or Zubrus being attractive to a few of these teams.
I think we’re being optimistic that anyone takes Rolston or White, even if it is to add salary. But hey, I like being optimistic. I think Zubrus and Clarkson are of better value for obvious reasons, but I’d really rather not trade Clarkson. Perhaps I’m hopelessly optimistic that he’s still yet to break out offensively, but he’s a great character guy, and at the very least, we can wait out this contract before figuring out what to do with him.
The fact that Lou suggested a transaction means there will probably be something. Addition by subtraction.
DownGoesAvery. Check out the hockey blog that's shaking the world: Down Goes Avery and on Twitter (@DownGoesAvery ). And now
Down Goes Avery on Facebook
Yeah, who would take Colin White at a 3M salary when he’s only been an excellent tough minutes defender for years now. And why is he even being brought up as someone we might trade?
Great question. That’s why I don’t want to see him traded. Why some fans have a beef with White, I won’t understand.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Jul 3, 2011 12:30 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
There’s been a strange disturbance in the force lately because Triumph, John and I have been agreeing on just about everything.
"I have an opinion and I know you have an answer, but in all honesty if you don’t know then don’t reply, because my opinion will always be better than your answer….and if you agree then highlight your response unless you don’t know."
I have to agree with not wanting to trade Clakrson. I know a lot of people complain about Zuburs being overpaid, but I think we do overlook his versatility. That versatility makes up for his lack of “statistics” at that salary. But, Clarkson has that tough guy, stand up for his teammates mentality that no one else on this team has. Not saying that other guys on the team don’t stick up for each other, but Clarkson is our tough guy who can still be a good player offensively.
To me, there is no one who could replace what Clarkson brings to this team from the enforcer/push a guy around characteristic, while a guy like Adam Henrique has at least the potential to replace Zubrus’ versatility with regard to playing the centre or wing position.
by TexasDevilFan on Jul 3, 2011 5:23 AM EDT up reply actions
Trade
Everybody is talking about who should leave the Devils in a trade, but there is no discussion about who (or what kind of player or players) comes in. Also, the assumption is that there will be only one trade. The team has a lot of young talent, especially on defense, and some vets who could be helpful to other clubs. How about the possibility that Lou makes a couple of trades that open up cap space, and brings in a skilled veteran forward and some prospects who only take up part of that money?
Additional option regarding Parise
While highly unlikely, I wouldn’t put it beyond Lou to sign Zach to a on year “conditional” contract for somewhere in the $5.5 M mark. The “conditional” clause would be dependent on Zach’s full recovery and knee condition in the coming season. Zach’s past record is incredible and justifies a contract on par with Elias, Kovy and Brodeur. His injury and recovery though still need to be proven to be complete, without detrimental affect on his ability and without reoccurence issues. This solution would enable a proper resigning to a “full size” contract next year, while still recognising Zach’s worth this year (within cap) and not committing long term till we know he’s still the same Zack Attack…
I agree and also felt this way for a while now. Plus, besides the benefits you mentioned for the Devils as a team, I also see benefits for Parise himself this way. If he sticks it out for a year at slightly less pay than he deserves (assuming he has made a full recovery), he can be resigned when he becomes UFA or sooner when more salary comes off the Devils’ books. This way, he gets the long term contract he deserves.
I personally feel that this would be the best situation for both parties, but I just don’t see it happening. I know Lou doesn’t really care about public relations, but the upheaval that would result from signing Parise to a one year deal would be massive. However, if he decides to sign him long term off the bat, considering he’s the best GM in the league (see what I did there?), I know it’ll be the proper decision.
The problem is he will become a UFA, and there will be a feeding frenzy.
Hell on Ice/In Lou We Trust/Twitter
Talking toilet, you may call me Jane.
by Kevin Sellathamby on Jul 3, 2011 7:57 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
And Parise then has a billion times more leverage.
Crazy would be NOT overanalyzing everything.
Lebda-free since July 3.
by nhlcheapshot on Jul 4, 2011 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions
bingo.
Hell on Ice/In Lou We Trust/Twitter
Talking toilet, you may call me Jane.
by Kevin Sellathamby on Jul 4, 2011 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Because of the Injury I think the exact opposite will happen. Zach is not going to sign a one year deal not knowing how his knee is. If he comes back and hurts his knee again or has a relapse? He may not ever get that big deal.
I was thinking it could be like a 3-4 year deal. at 5.5M. Which is still a raise for him.
I agree about the feeding frenzy next year if ZP hits UFA status next July 1st. LL needs to sign this guy to at least 3 – 5 yrs now to keep him off the market. The reason I’m saying only 3-5 years is because of the uncertainty with the knee. If LL signs Zp to any contingency contract I’d be shocked. Why would ZP want to do that when hes going to be awarded at least 5.5 M this year through arbitration and prove to everyone the knee is or isn’t an issue?
If it goes to arbitration you can start counting down the days for ZP as a Devil. He’ll take the hammer back with his good play and take it to the bank next year. It seems we have 6-6.5 M to give him if you take Bryce’s contract off the club through LTIR or bury it in Albany. I’d think a contract for 3 years with cap hit of 6.25 M is fair to both Devs and ZP.
He’d still only be just turning 30 by the end of contract and would certainly get his biggest contract yet if his play lived up to it and the Devs get their future captain w/o selling the farm to find out if this guy will return to form.
As far as trades, I can’t see anyone take Zubes off our hands unless there is some enticement like futures or prospects. I could definitely see interest from teams in Clarkson however. Hes younger,cheaper and there still may be untapped potential and he plays the role of agitator/ enforcer very well which is still very marketable around this league. I’m hoping both Zubes and Clarkson stay put and maybe this will hash itself out come trade deadline when we see what the team looks like.
I think I read Salmela had walked. Is this true? Is he gone?
Onions are tougher than you. Onions make me cry. You couldn't make me cry. Onions are tougher than you.
by leed's 13th child on Jul 3, 2011 11:30 AM EDT reply actions
He is an unrestricted free agent. Anyone can sign him, including the Devils, if they so choose.
"I have an opinion and I know you have an answer, but in all honesty if you don’t know then don’t reply, because my opinion will always be better than your answer….and if you agree then highlight your response unless you don’t know."
Let's make a deal
I am not a hockey guru. I just love the game. Nor do I fully understand all these scales people use to over analyze productivity or the lack of it. I do know one thing, coaches want consistency. They can come up with a game plan provided they can count on level of performance anticipated from any given individual. As others have stated above, Mr. Clarkson does not provide consistent performance period. He has his moments, they all do at this level, each NHL player has to be gifted to make it to this level, yet Mr. Clarkson despite being given the opportunity continues to fall short. Mr. Zuburs is similar in many aspects yet seems to muster a little more intensity and has a relatively big body and lets face it, big bodies have there place. Mr. Urbom, I am sorry, I have watched all season in Albany, he is not even close. You’d think he is playing in a non checking league half the time. He is good at the point on a power play at the AHL level and had a fair number of assists, yet Urbom would be lost in the bigs even as the third pairing. Yes, Sestito has made some pretty bone headed mistakes with NJ last season, but that kid can shoot. Pair him up with White and I think you’ve got something. PL3 a crowd favorite up here came off his highest goal season ever but he is not an NHL caliber player other than with the gloves off – then watch out.
I don’t know about lou sometimes. It seems like he’s too patient when he needs to do things a little quicker. I think that he should be taking care of these issues as soon as possible. Its quite obvious that the best route to take is via trade. I don’t know if he’s too loyal to his players or if nobody wants to make a trade with him or what. If he makes a deal sooner, than he has more time to consider more options because there are more players out there that are still not signed. The longer he waits, the less good players are available if he decides to add someone. Thats what yanks my chain about him sometimes.
It seems like he’s going down the same road as last year. Alot of the other teams that didn’t make the playoffs are improving they’re teams and it seems that were staying pretty much the same. I know we had a bad start last year and everything but bad teams are getting better so its going to be that much harder to find easy wins.
Yeah, but down the stretch with the absence of Captain Crankypants and Johnny Mac the Devils that showed that they were one of the elite teams in the NHL still. The length of hot streak and the stuff we saw was more than a streak. It was the team playing to its full potential and I personally think that with Zach Parise back this year and a very similar roster the Devils can once again be a dominant team with the correct choice of coach.
by Jacob Shepherd on Jul 3, 2011 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions
I think the first half of the rally was well-deserved. The team played well and deserved to win every game. The second half of the rally…I’m not so sure. There were a lot of games down the stretch where the team got outplayed but eked out a win with some luck.
I don’t think this team can be “dominant” this year. There’s still issues with a lack of mobility and goal-scoring from the defense, and a few key players on the downside of their careers. I think they should be a playoff team and perhaps even challenge for a divisional title since the Flyers are weaker in the short term and Crosby’s health is still a question mark, but the Caps and Bruins should be the class of the conference.
Oh yeah, I completely agree with you there. Boston and the Caps are still the cream of the crop in the East, but I think the Devils will likely be back to their old ways of a being a team that is certainly not a guaranteed win almost and even a team that could be dangerous when they come to town. I dont think they win the conference, but I think they will be a playoff team again hopefully. I even think that they may finally get out of the first round (Maybe, hopefully, please just this once?)
by Jacob Shepherd on Jul 3, 2011 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Or we could've brought back the BERGFORCE for half a mil
What a steal for Nashville :(
by J-Nasty on Jul 3, 2011 8:01 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Come on, guys
What does it say up at the top there? IN LOU WE TRUST. He will get something done. Rollie, Whitey, Salvador, Zubes. Any one of those guys traded solves our cap issue. I would hate to lose Zubes the most, but all four will probably be gone anyway, they’re all UFA at the end of ‘11-’12. I like JF’s idea. Package Rollie with Corrente for a team like Nashville, the Isles, or Jets, they are all well under the floor. Heck, they could extend Rollie a few years at $3mm a year and he retires, bringing them a nice dead cap hit they don’t have to pay out. There’s value there, presented the right way. Plus, Rollie is a leader in the locker room. He’s just overpaid.
Dainius Zubrus has two years left on his deal, not one. He’ll be a free agent in the summer of 2013.
Brian Rolston and Colin White both have no-trade clauses. That doesn’t mean they can’t be traded, but it does make it more difficult to deal either one because they’ll have to consent to any deal.
Bryce Salvador is coming off a serious concussion that cost him all of last year. I imagine his trade value is minimal at best, and I don’t see any reason why a team should be interested in him. If other teams need defensemen, there are cheaper options with less risk involved…. Salvador might never play again.
If a team acquired Rolston and extended his contract with the “understanding” that he’d retire and never collect it, the NHL would call that cap circumvention and sanction the offending franchise. So, that scenario isn’t going to happen.
Yes, Brian Rolston is overpaid for what he provides. What evidence is there that he is a leader, however? He may have been one of the rotating captains in Minnesota, but I haven’t seen any evidence of the leadership you tout and I question why other teams would be interested in it.
Teams like Winnipeg, Nashville, and the Islanders have their choice of which bad contracts to take from a team, if any. Why should any of them take Brian Rolston (and Matthew Corrente) when other teams will likely offer better players and/or superior “enticement”?
Exactly, and you know what? Another day goes by, and nothing. I’m not trying to be pessimistic but moves should be made soon while the iron is hot. Instead Lou will just sit and watch it all unfold and miss out on some great opportunities. Just like last summer. I have alot of respect for Lou but I just think he’s a little too patient right now.
You’d prefer Lou Lamorello make a trade for the sake of looking like he’s doing something as opposed to waiting for a good/reasonable move to make itself available? Rushing to make a move is a spectacular way to be fleeced in a trade. Making a move for the sake of making a move, or making a move because of perceived public/ownership pressure takes a lot of leverage away from a General Manager, meaning it becomes a LOT harder to negotiate a sound hockey deal.
There’s no reason to panic and force a transaction right this second. The Devils are not presently squeezed by the salary cap situation they are in (this might change when/if Zach Parise signs a new deal or gets a sizable award in arbitration). The franchises below the salary cap floor have a fair amount of time to reach that particular level. There is no trade deadline/roster freeze/artificial date to constrain things, either.
Lou Lamorello has enough to do without someone jogging his elbow. Parise’s new deal, the other RFAs, combing the bargain bin for UFAs who might help with roster depth, hiring a new coach…. it isn’t like he’s taken off for an exotic island somewhere and will be incommunicado for a month.
Patience. Take a deep breath.
We’ll see acasser, I hope your right. It just seems like he has too much loyalty to his players when you need to make a move. I repeat “it seems”. I like all the obvious movable/tradable players but thats the business of the game. Sometimes change is good. Other players step up and fill in the way you don’t expect. If you ask me, they are squeezed for salary. Sooner or later the Parise deal is going to get done and he will have to make a move and he might have to give players away then. At least now there are more decent players out there that are still available. Last year, after the Kovi stuff got settled, we all knew that he had to make a move and what did he do? Nothing. He didn’t make a move until the Langs trade. In January. Then they finally started winning. I hope that doesn’t happen again.
Yea, so why didn’t he do something after the Kovi contract got settled? There weren’t any injuries then.
Maybe because the league hosed him by dragging it out so long and thus leaving his options significantly limited. As bad as it was, if MacLean had half a clue, the lack of personnel wouldn’t have been a huge roadblock. Sometimes, as bad as it seems, doing nothing is better than doing something (stupid).
Go Devils
Go Jets
Need to lose weight?
Perhaps Lou’s lack of a move after the Kovalchuk contract’s settling was based on the lack of a reasonable move to make.
I imagine “Plan A” was to make a reasonable trade that shed salary. That being said, any team on the receiving end had their roster and payroll largely set by the time the whole Kovalchuk contract fiasco came to its conclusion, so said recipients would likely have demanded a premium for accomodating Lou. Whether that was a 1st-round pick (the previous price Lou paid to dump a bad contract on the eve of a season) or a top prospect, parting with either would not have been appetizing.
I imagine “Plan B” would have been to put a highly-paid veteran on waivers at the end of training camp — I figure the two most likely candidates would have been Bryce Salvador or Dainius Zubrus at that point. Shedding one or both for “free” would have made the Devils cap compliant, and if either went unclaimed I imagine they would have been riding the bus for Albany.
As it was, “Plan C” transpired. Bryce Salvador got hurt, enabling the Devils to squeeze under the cap by stashing him on LTIR. Once Brian Rolston got hurt in the opening week of the season, the Devils were capable of sticking him there as well and fielding a full roster instead of the bare bones 20.
….
Sometimes, the best move is no move at all. Making a move for the sake of making a move immediately is a fantastic way to make a lousy move you regret later.

by 
























