New Jersey Devils Sloppy to Start, Unable to Complete Comeback in 4-3 Loss to New York Rangers
Tonight was the return of hockey back at the Prudential Center as the New Jersey Devils hosted the New York Rangers. I had to keep telling myself that this is just a preseason game. Emotions ran high, the action got intense as time went on, the atmosphere from the crowd was noticeable, and I got caught up in it all. As great as it was to be a fan and watching the Devils play hockey, how it played out was a disappointment.
Sure, part of that is the result. Who can say they're happy with a loss to the Rangers of all teams? While I know full well this game really means nothing, I still can't say I liked it. However, the source of my feelings really has to do with how the team played. The team was not nearly as sharp as they were on Wednesday night. There were many turnovers in all three zones; the team was too passive on offense to start the game (so many passed up shooting opportunities); bad decisions in terms of positioning and passing were noticeable and seemingly common early on; and the defense had some frightening moments. I didn't expect the Devils to play as they did on Wednesday with a different roster going up against a different Rangers team. I also didn't expect the Devils to go to the other extreme and be so sloppy.
That said, there were some positives in this game. The main one is that the Devils didn't settle for defeat when they were down 3-1 in the second period and were out-shot by a 3:1 margin at one point. No, they clawed their way back into the game and ultimately tied it on the last second of a 5-on-3 power play (woo!). They kept up the attack, reduced the shots on net rift between the two teams, played much tighter on defense, and came ever so close to completing the comeback and breaking through with a win. Alas, an open long shot found it's way in late to put the Rangers up and disallowed goal aside, the Devils couldn't match that.
One can argue that that game was of two halves: a very poor first half where the Devils were rolled by the Rangers; followed by a more heartening and effort-filled second half where they made a game of it but were spoiled late. Another could argue that the while the game wasn't so one-sided later on, the Devils were still out of sync when it came to puck movement and control and it undercut their attempt at a big come-from-behind win. Both can agree, this was the best possible kind of preseason game: one where it didn't seem like just a preseason game. I certainly didn't feel that way at the Rock.
Please continue on after the jump for further thoughts on tonight's game, plus an embedded highlight video of tonight's game from NHL.com. If you want to see what the other side is saying, please check out Bryan Winter's recap at Blueshirt Banter.
The Highlights: For some reason, preseason stats aren't available at NHL.com. So you'll just have to make do with general "what I saw" thoughts on the game. However, there is this highlight video.
The Best Devil Was...: Ilya Kovalchuk was clearly the best Devil in tonight's game. He was very productive as he set up goals for Adam Henrique and Jacob Josefson; and he fired a laser past Martin Biron on the 5-on-3 power play which then tied the game at 3 in the second period. I cannot emphasize enough how powerful that shot was, nor how I love it when he gets that shot off. It wasn't just his points that made him stand out. Kovalchuk was forechecking, he was hustling through the neutral zone, and he was one of the few Devils whose passes didn't go astray or awry in every other attempt. #17 wasn't so hot on Wednesday; but tonight's performance was far, far better.
About that Larsson Kid: Adam Larsson was fantastic on Wednesday. Tonight, he wasn't so fantastic - at least in the first half of this game. He was unfortunately in the wrong place at the wrong time as Brad Richards knocked a puck off of him to beat Martin Brodeur early in the first period. Larsson wasn't in the right place at the right time on several shifts early on, as he looked out of his place. He wasn't confident, he wasn't poised, and he wasn't making much of a difference. He had to be moved into a pairing with Matt Taormina and take different match-ups away from Bryce Salvador. Larsson even took a dumb penalty on a power play - which didn't burn New Jersey as Josefson scored on the ensuring 4-on-4 situation.
Yet, Larsson did showcase his passing skills on offense very well. He was solid at the point on New Jersey's power plays, the one that carried over into the third period notwithstanding. His dishes to Kovalchuk for the team's third goal as well as the disallowed goal late in the game were just about perfect. Peter DeBoer showed a lot of faith in the youngster as he was manning the point late in an empty-net 5-on-5 situation. Larsson was in control there, ensuring the puck would stay in and make the correct reads to keep the desperate attack alive.
Basically, Larsson got better as the game went on. Which is not unlike the team as a whole. The inconsistency shouldn't be that much of a surprise since he is only 18. He's feeling the stress of playing at such a high level of competition, as Gulitti reported after the game. That said, it's also evidence that I wouldn't start counting on him to make a difference right away. I leave it to you to decide whether his pluses were bigger than his minuses, as I'm in the middle.
The Return of Bryce Salvador: DeBoer's post game comments were complimentary. I will say that I didn't notice the defensive defenseman too much; which is a compliment in of itself. It wasn't all good, though. I felt Bryce Salvador's retaliatory penalty (the interference call) was kind of dumb; and I would have liked to have seen him do more. I liked him better than Andy Greene tonight, at least.
I, A Stiff Wind, Will Knock You Down, Goaltender!: Nick Palmieri didn't do too much tonight. That's not good for him. Even worse, his most notable moment came late in the game. As the Devils were scrambling for an equalizer down 4-3 late in the game, Palmieri kept it simple and went to the net. Fine. Well, Michael Sauer draped over him and Palmieri ended up right next to goaltender Chad Johnson. Johnson apparently felt contacted and went down like he got shot. As that happened, Larsson's pass was re-directed into the far side of the net by Kovalchuk. The refs ruled it "no goal" and tagged Palmieri for interference, a mark on the game's record.
From where I sat, if there was any contact on Johnson, it was minimal. Moreover, it could have easily been the result of Sauer's momentum knocking Palmieri into his own goaltender. I think Johnson embellished (read: dove) on the play. The goal certainly should have been reviewed as well. While I think Palmieri and the Devils got a raw deal, I can't say Palmieri did much else tonight that warrants further notice or praise.
Did Anyone Play Themselves Off the Team?: I don't think so. The most invisible players were Palmieri, Greene, and Mark Fayne - all three of whom are probably on the team anyway. David Steckel had some bad times, but it didn't burn the team too badly - and again, he's likely on the team anyhow. Tim Sestito proved to me he's not a NHL player, but that's not really anything new to me.
Beef, It's What Was for the Third Period: With the game tied, both teams got chippy and the big hits went flying. The refs let much of this go, with the exception of Brad Mills. Mills took it too far and so earned himself two minor penalties in the third period. The first was dumb, a hit away from the play after an offensive zone faceoff. The second was a little less dumb, as he hit a guy without the puck in an exchange where, well, lots of hits were thrown by both sides. Mills kept his composure later, but it was a clear example that the rivalry exists in the preseason. DeBoer couldn't have been too mad at him as he got ice time very late in the game.
About the Goalies: Martin Brodeur played in his first game and it could have gone better. He did bail out the Devils early on, making a massive save four minutes into the game. He also got shelled early on, facing 18 shots in 26 minutes. Yet, he didn't look good on Derek Stepan's goal; he probably should have stopped that one. I'm not sure about the fourth goal. It was a long shot by Brendan Bell that got past his left pad and into the net; but I swore it had to be tipped by someone. In Gulitti's live blog of the game, he thought Brad Richards was the tipper. When I saw the video of it, it appeared so to me. If he didn't and there was no tip, then that was a heinous goal. Nevertheless, Brodeur could have used a better team in front of him in the first half of the game, at least. He got hung out to dry on Marian Gaborik's power play goal.
Martin Biron can't claim much superiority. He made the first move with Adam Henrique coming at him, so the young center made him pay for that. While Jacob Josefson's shot was impressive on it's own, I'm sure Biron would have loved another crack at that. At least on the Kovalchuk goal he can take solace in the fact that very few, if anybody, could have stopped that shot. He can also be glad that his team played much tighter in the slot than the Devils did in theirs. There were several instances where a Rangers defender or backchecking forward made a stickcheck or boxed out a player for a rebound to cut down on Biron's work. It worked well until the Rangers took a couple of bad penalties in a row in the second period. Chad Johnson was fine, probably should have been tested a little more in retrospect.
Both Biron and Brodeur will be fine in the future, it was their first games in preseason after all. I'm just noting that they weren't great, that's all.
Did I See That?: On Gaborik's power play goal, the Devils appeared to be set up in a diamond on the penalty kill. I hope that wasn't by design because I hate the diamond. I hate it even more when three Devils are watching Gaborik put in a rebound in the slot. I'd like to think DeBoer and the coaches made a change since the Devils went to a more traditional and less risky box formation on later kills.
Sykora Played At Wing and the Response Was "Eh:" Like Mattias Tedenby, I felt Petr Sykora had some good moments at right wing but overall, his performance wasn't all that impressive. Having an assist is nice and continuing to get power play time speaks well of how the Devils see him. Do I think he's any closer to making the team? Not really, based on tonight's performance.
Quick Tactical Note: I've noticed that defensemen were pinching in on offense and outright jumping up on the play when it seemed sensible to do so. This is not unlike how they did under Jacques Lemaire, which I think is a good thing for DeBoer to do. There's still other facets of the game that need to be worked out, but that's what preseason is for.
Anything Quick About the Opposition: I think Brad Richards and Marian Gaborik are going to be difficult to play against when they're on the same line. The Wojtek Wolski-Richards-Gaborik unit was the Rangers' best line by far tonight. I don't know if Wolski is really the right left winger for them; but he didn't hinder Richards or Gaborik. Either way, I'm not looking forward to that duo for 6 games.
Lastly, Prior to the Game: The jumbotron (or RockVision) showed a short tribute video of those NHL players who have perished in this past summer. It was well-received and not overdone. Fans throughout the Rock politely and appropriately applauded. The applause was notably louder for former Devils and Rangers; and it's peak for Alexander Vasyunov, the former Devils prospect. There was unity before the game began and fan loyalties took over - as it should in a game between two rivals.
Those are my thoughts about the game. How do you feel about the Devils performance? What do you want them to do better next time? Who do you think was particularly good or bad tonight? Who, if anyone, improved their chances of making the team after tonight? Do you agree or disagree with my assessments? Is Chad Johnson really a diver? Did you have to keep telling yourself "this is only a preseason game" as you watched this? Please leave your answers and other thoughts on tonight's game in the comments. Thanks to everyone who commented in the Gamethread and thank you for reading. Tomorrow, the Devils go to Long Island to play the Islanders.
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It was a more skilled team they played today
Wednesday night they played a bunch of kids fighting for a spot on the Rangers fourth line. Tonight they faced the Rangers big two, with Wolski, and their new captain, also they faced the Rangers second defensive pairing, who dont play flashy but make a very solid combo.
I was expecting a different looking game this time. Last time it looked like an NHL team (devils) versing an AHL team, which it kind of was since they were playing mostly against Rangers prospects. Tonight they faced more of the regular roster.
I expected Larsson to not look as solid either the speed at which Brad Richards and Gaborik come at you is a bit more then just a step above what Dale Weise brings to the table. The kid has tons of promise you are fooling yourself if anyone thinks he is going to step into his first game against real nhl first line players and come out looking like Lidstrom. It will take some time for him to get to that #1 dman that the devils need. Although I said that I feel he is ready to play in the nhl and has been great offensively. I can easily see him being very solid starting on the third pairing and the power play. Maybe later in the season he will be on the second pairing. Im gonna say in 3 years he will be known as one of the better Dmen in the league. Always must remember that defense takes longer to improve then offense.
Marty didnt look so hot at first though. I will say both Marty’s had a sucky first game in both nets. But he is looking his age, he is slow to move after he sets, not good. his lateral movement has been getting slower and slower as the years go by. He will probably turn it on as the season goes but there might be a shaky start to the season with Marty.
Devils didnt look that bad the Rangers just seriously improved their lines compared to Wednesday they brought more speed, skill, and grit to this game. This is what caused the devils to look sloppy, they had less time to move the puck and they paid for their mistakes more in this game.
Sykora looked like the second best player on the team tonight behind Kovalchuk. I dont feel like that is a good thing, the guy can not skate like a top line player anymore he has to rely on positioning and his shot. He might serve as a stop gap until Zajak but I am not to happy to see that an old guy is out shining all of the youth and most of the regular lineup.
Side note Brian Boyle is getting scary. He looks even quicker and tougher then he was last season. I think he is a UFA in 2 years someone to keep on the radar you cant teach size like that and he has added a ton of speed and power to his huge frame, looks like one of the better bottom 6 centers in the league.
I think this game is a great example of why Patrik Elias is the team MVP. A lot of fans may fear the day Brodeur leaves, but I think for the past decade, Elias has been by far the most important player and will be the most missed whether people realize it or not.
I was thinking the exact same thing during the game. Patty traditionally plays very strong (read: has good corsi/fenwick) against top competition in the NHL. Once the season gets underway it will be him (and maybe Parise) paired against a line like Richards/Gaborik/Wolski (really? Wolski?) and not rookie Adam Henrique.
Come Say Hello! Section 231 - Row 2 - Seat 20
I also thought Kovalchuk was the best player on the ice for the Devils. He was racing to every puck , had some nice crisp passing, awesome shots and for a preseason game was visibly upset when his supposed tying goal was disallowed. The emotion was good to see. I thought the defense was erratic and out of position too often and no one on the defense stood out as having a great game overall. Aside from Kovalchuk, I thought Henrique had some good shifts and shows offensive potential, Sykora shows he still has an upside offensively even if he no longer has the speed, and aside from the penalties, MIlls had another very strong game. He seems to get in good position, battles hard for every puck and won a key faceoff at the end. He is really helping his chances to be the surprise pick to make the team. This team has more depth than many of those in the last several years. Larsson has so much talent but is still a kid…..He is going to be special.
Its only preseason but its still nice to see the kids step up and play well. Larsson, Henrique, JJ all had nice moments and hopefully their confidence will continue to grow from positive play. Real good to see Bryce back. Kinda forgot the steady, physical presence he brings as the team had a lot of turnovers but it is still preseason. There is going to be some hard choices for Deboer and co. but its good to see there is some quality depth the team can call on this year if needed.
I agree re the Marty comments. After seeing the kids in net on Weds, Marty seemed a couple of steps slower. I’ll put it down to rust for now, but it’s a bit of a concern. (E.g. I thought Kinkaid looked much stronger on Weds).
I liked Adam Henrique yesterday. He has good speed and vision and I think he’s making a strong case to be in the squad.
PP … really positive signs there. The guys have got intensity right now, which if they can carry through to the regular season will hopefully sort that area out.
On the 5-on-3 I was a bit concerned at the waste of the opportunity (up to the Kovy missile). I mentioned to Tri the other night that one of the PP stats should be a ratio of PP SOG to PP passes in the offensive zone. (The other being what % of time on the PP is in the offensive zone). Looking at that 5-on-3, I think I would also want a stat on “wasted static pass-and-returns”, defined as a pass from one static player to another static player, who then returns it to the same tactical situation. (Hmm – so the stat should be the % of PP time wasted with static pass & returns). I appreciate that the goal is to draw the D out of shape, but I would like to see this done with motion at both ends, so the pass is into space for the player to skate onto, and the return goes somewhere else (even if just 6 ft across). So applying this to the 5-on-3 … I feel that 90% of it was wasted like this, which is even more a crime on a 5-on-3 situation. What do you think, John?
On the pinching up by the D … I was thinking more than once yesterday that this is going to be an exciting year! Pinching up and driving a strong forecheck is going to lead to some exciting end-to-end action. Makes me think that athleticism in our net is going to be a more important factor under this coach.
Final point … it’s only pre-season, and we were still experimenting with kids last night. When we beat the Rags, any time, any place, it’s a good night. When we don’t, well it’s just a pre-season scrimmage. So it’s all good.
I have pretty much the same view as John when I’m at the games — the seats I get to use for a handful of games this season are in Section 3 (whereas John is in Section 1). For the most part, I agree with what John said above. My thoughts as takeaway from this game:
- I spent most of the game wishing the Devils would hit something and someone. Too many times, it seemed to me as if the Devils sagged back and allowed the Rangers to attack without much pressure as if it were an All-Star Game. It also seemed to me that they allowed the Rangers to take some liberties with the physical side of the game without trying to get their own back. Now…. I know a lot of the Devils’ “beef” was not in the lineup, but there are guys fighting for jobs who could have tried to make an impression with a hit where their play wasn’t doing so.
- It’s been two games, and the Devils have scored one goal when the other team has had five skaters on the ice. I know two games is a small sample size, but I find it a little bit disturbing and will continue to do so until and unless this changes.
- Adam Henrique was very good last night, creating several opportunities on offense. I think he was the best Devils’ forward on the ice outside of Kovalchuk (and perhaps Josefson). If he can put together a few more performances like that, I think he makes the team ahead of Sykora, both because of his youth/potential and for financial reasons — he’s already being paid, whereas Sykora would have to sign a contract and commit Vanderbeek and Co. to writing extra checks.
- On the other hand, Matt Taormina didn’t seem to do anything to justify a roster spot in Newark, at least for Opening Night. I didn’t notice him much offensively, and he seemed to have several mishaps playing the puck, even when there weren’t any blue shirts around.
- Adam Larsson is being given every opportunity to make the team and then some. I couldn’t help but find myself wondering how some of the other prospects would perform when given the quality of ice time that Larsson is, especially getting to play most of the PP and with the top guns to boot.
- Can someone please tell me what Brad Mills was doing on the second PP unit and why he was on the ice late in the game when the Devils needed a goal? If the idea is to have a big body out there and someone to take a face-off, isn’t David Steckel a better idea, especially as Steckel is going to make the team (and Mills is not, barring something significant that I’m currently ignorant of)?
- It was clearly pre-season for the referees as well. They missed several obvious calls, and made a couple that had me scratching my head.
- Finally, I agree that Palmieri’s penalty was not a penalty. At the same time, the men in stripes avoided one of the things that drives me crazy: the “one from Column A” and “one from Column B” call. I hate it when there’s a penalty for a dive and a penalty for a trip/hook/interference/whatever. I hate it when a goal is waved off for goaltender interference but no one goes to the box. In my opinion, it’s either goaltender interference or it is a good goal, and there shouldn’t be a middle ground.
wait… Palmieri did go to the box after that goalie interference call.
And Kovalchuk speeds away, great moves, busting through, DID YOU SEE THAT?
Can someone please tell me what Brad Mills was doing on the second PP unit and why he was on the ice late in the game when the Devils needed a goal? If the idea is to have a big body out there and someone to take a face-off, isn’t David Steckel a better idea, especially as Steckel is going to make the team (and Mills is not, barring something significant that I’m currently ignorant of)?
Sure. Training camp isn’t just about finding the best 23 bodies for the team, it’s about figuring out your depth chart. Who do you want when there’s an injury?
Finally, I agree that Palmieri’s penalty was not a penalty. At the same time, the men in stripes avoided one of the things that drives me crazy: the "one from Column A" and "one from Column B" call. I hate it when there’s a penalty for a dive and a penalty for a trip/hook/interference/whatever. I hate it when a goal is waved off for goaltender interference but no one goes to the box. In my opinion, it’s either goaltender interference or it is a good goal, and there shouldn’t be a middle ground.
the referees aren’t making anything up – there’s a rule about incidental contact. it’s a good rule. i also think it was pretty clearly a penalty.
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
I don’t want Brad Mills anywhere near a Power Play, under any circumstances. His career record shows a general lack of offensive talent, and I’m sure there are other available bodies whose presence has the potential to be beneficial to the team. Sure, it’s only the pre-season, but I’d rather see people who might contribute out there. I don’t forsee Brad Mills being a part of this club going forward in 2011-2012 unless there are a boatload of injuries…. and if that happens, the PP will likely be the least of our concerns.
As for the goaltender interference, I will admit that I haven’t seen a good replay of the contact and I wasn’t paying full attention to the crease — I was following the puck at the time and not watching the jostling around the goaltender. Had there been something I deemed as “significant”, I’m reasonably sure I would have noticed it a little more. That aside, I despise the “incidental contact” rule. In my opinion, either it is a penalty or it is “no harm no foul”. I hate the middle ground/“one from each column” decision, and I feel that such a decision from the men in stripes is a way to try and split the baby without offending anyone.
I don’t want Brad Mills anywhere near a Power Play, under any circumstances. His career record shows a general lack of offensive talent, and I’m sure there are other available bodies whose presence has the potential to be beneficial to the team. Sure, it’s only the pre-season, but I’d rather see people who might contribute out there. I don’t forsee Brad Mills being a part of this club going forward in 2011-2012 unless there are a boatload of injuries…. and if that happens, the PP will likely be the least of our concerns.
It’s pretty clear how the power play is going to run this year, at least at the beginning – it’s going to run even more from the point, with the two men in front largely acting as screens or players for a rebound.
Mills doesn’t belong there, but that is a good way of assessing his talent level.
I don’t know if you noticed, but Tim Sestito played 37 games for this team last year, and that wasn’t because of injuries – that was because of one injury. Mills could very easily play 20 games for this team. I think he’s better than Sestito.
Also, Palmieri came right into the crease and bumped the goaltender – it’s open and shut. The incidental contact rule is a good one and I won’t debate it here, it seems like you are rather entrenched on the issue.
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
Attendance was 14,719 – not bad at all. The atmosphere was great. Supporters section was fun especially with six Rangers fans in the vicinity making playoffs jokes (really?). As George Carlin once said, “some people are really…stupid.”
I’m with the consensus. I saw a lot of puck watching and waiting rather than anticipating and going to the puck. That’s why you lose those 50/50 battles and that’s why they were out-shot by a large margin in the 1st and 2nd periods. As the intensity got up, they played better. Still a lot of kinks of figure out.
In Lou We Trust: SBN Blog of the New Jersey Devils
by Matthew Ventolo on Sep 24, 2011 3:06 PM EDT reply actions
A lot of Rangers fans are too young to remember 1994
Let them celebrate a game that does not count.
I was very pleased with our rookies/2nd year players.
Bright future in Newark.
The Devils have won more titles than all Philly pro sports teams combined in the last 25 years
by Real Big Devils Fan on Sep 24, 2011 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions
Ehm I'm not too worried.
The Rangers first goals was a lucky bounce off of Larsson. Who was where he should be. The third goal i liked what Marty did, he read the play very well. It just went right to Gaborik. Another tough break. All three of the Devils goals were not lucky bounces and I liked that. The Rangers benefited from a few good breaks.
I was impressed by Adam Henrique last night, he made his backhand look effortless.
Jacob Josefson I thought played a great game. Watching him carry the puck through the neutral zone and over the blueline was a real treat. Plus his goal was sweet.
Ilya Kovalchuk played one of the best games I’ve seen him play in a Devils uniform. He forechecked, played the body and hustled. His goal and two assists were well deserved.
Last but not least Adam Larsson, boy is he a terrific skater. I thought he his good outweighed his bad and his two assists were indicitive to that. He also got off some very nice passes.
went to the game. hesitation on power play was infuriating
Can’t stand watching the Devils pass around the puck 20 times before even attempting a shot on the power play, especially when you’re down by 1 goal and there’s a minute left in the game. Absolutely infuriating, and they did it constantly. The power play will never improve if they don’t start shooting the danm puck.

by 






















