Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Yankees Deny Rumors That Team Is For Sale

Zach Parise: Travis Zajac Says He'll Be Out for 4-6 Months

Travis Zajac: Now out for 4-6 months instead of 3? (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)

That's the biggest New Jersey Devils news relevant for this coming season.  At a NHL player promotional function at the Prudential Center, Rich Chere had the opportunity to talk extensively with Zach Parise and put this article together at NJ.com.  It's a must-read, of course.  The best news from the article, in my opinion, is that Parise says he's at 100%.  Good, he'll need to be at 100% should he want to maximize his value and for the Devils to succeed in 2011-12.  The bad news has to do with what Parise said about Travis Zajac (emphasis mine):

"Pretty similar to me, he’s in a brace for six weeks," Parise said. "He can’t put any pressure on it. Then you get into the muscle building. You have to build your muscle back before you can even start skating. It’s a long recovery. When I talked to him he said it was going to be 4-6 months."

This is shocking, to say the least.  We knew Zajac was injured earlier in August, he tore his left Achilles tendon during offseason training.  He successfully underwent surgery and at the time of this news coming out, Lou said recovery should take "around three months" according to this post by Tom Gulitti at Fire & Ice.  Weeks later and now according to Zach Parise, who's close to Zajac to discuss matters, that Zajac said he'll be out even longer than that.  That's some bad news.   Note: Post has been updated late at night with a new link and quotes from Zajac directly.

Star-divide

Certainly, we're going to have to get clarification on who's correct and what happened to the original announcement. Was it a case of crossing up talk, where the doctors say one thing and the patient says another? Is this a new development caused by a complication or just another opinion?  Surely, we'll find out in coming days through Gulitti and/or Chere.

Personally, I want to find out that Zajac won't be out later than three months.  As the team's top center and someone who plays in all situations, he's an important part of a team that will undertake a season of redemption.  A difference of even only a month would be huge.  it'll delay Zajac's return to the team during the season.  It's not enough just to recover from the injury, but time will be needed for Zajac to get back into playing shape. He'll still be rusty while most of the league has been playing regularly and often.  Under the original announcement, you could slot Zajac to a return at about mid-November.  Moving that back to mid-December to mid-February means the team's going to have to make do for a larger portion of the season without him.  If we as Devils fans learned anything at all from last season, it's that the regular season matters and three horrid months can dig too deep of a hole to climb out of. 

To be fair, I don't think they'll be doomed without Zajac; his absence will just make it harder - as it should when any top player isn't available to play.  Going back to Chere's article, I think Parise has the right idea about Zajac's importance and what the team will do.

"It’s tough because he’s a guy that plays a lot," Parise noted. "He plays in every situation. He’s your best faceoff guy, best penalty-killer. He’s on the ice when it’s 3-on-5. He’s on the ice when we’re on a 5-on-3. Those guys are tough to replace, but we’ll move guys around and have to make do until he gets back.

As bad as this new information is, it's not the end of the world for the Devils.  As I have explained in this post when Zajac's injury was originally announced, the Devils don't need to make a trade from a bad position to get a center or sign one from an incredibly weak free agent market.  They can fill in Zajac's spot from within; and I don't think the news that Zajac could be out for longer than 3 months really changes that.  The free agent market hasn't gotten any better; and a trade for a top-two-line capable center could be too costly to fill in for 3-6 months.

Patrik Elias played center last season, performed admirably, and will be called upon to do so again. Parise even noted that in the Chere article.  I still think the man behind him should be Dainius Zubrus.  He has the versatility to play center, he's done it before in New Jersey, he's been a center earlier in his career, and he's used to playing against top-6 competition. This would open a spot at wing, but I think that's preferable to the alternative.  It's going to be easier to fill in a winger position than to hope, say, Jacob Josefson is ready for a top-two-line role at age 20 and with only 28 games of NHL experience (though it wouldn't hurt). Likewise for other potential centers on the team, who are more suited for bottom-two-line roles than bigger responsibilities.  Again, Peter DeBoer will have all of training camp (starting next week) and preseason to evaluate the players and find an effective solution until Zajac comes back.  I don't think Lou needs to make a move for a center unless other options fail miserably in the beginning of the season.

In the meantime, fans should hope that the Devils will remain relatively healthy at center; and that Zajac recovers properly and as quickly as possible.    I also want to know your opinion.  What do you make of the news that Zajac could now be out for 4-6 months instead of 3? Do you also a little hope that it's really 3 and not 4-6 like I do?  Do you think that the Devils should fill in Zajac's spot from within first; or do you think the time is now for Lou to make some kind of move?  Please leave your answers and other thoughts about Zajac, his injury, and the Devils' center depth in the comments. Thanks for reading.

Late Night Update: Tom Gulitti talked to Zajac directly about his injury this evening and reported on it at Fire & Ice. Here are the important quotes:

“It depends on the athlete and the person, but from guys I’ve talked to with the injury that (three months) seems like a reasonable timeframe for some guys and some guys were a little longer,” Zajac said. “Hopefully, if things progress well (he’ll be back in three months). I was told it’s the rehab that is the key part that’s going to get you back the quickest.”

...

“It depends on how hard I push it and how my body reacts to everything,” he said. “From what I hear, that (taking four to six months) could happen, but, hopefully, I’m on the lower end of the time frame. We’ll see. I’m definitely not going to rush back and ruin the rest of the year by coming back too early.”

Well, who better than to get more details from the player in question.  Only, this doesn't actually clarify things at all.  It could be 3 months or it could be 4-6 months.  I can understand and appreciate the possibility of variation in recovery. What I don't get is that this is a point of contention now. That said, I can see how this may be moot since Zajac will be still be on the shelf for quite some time.

Comment 19 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Well that is not the best new I have heard today. Hopefully the clarification comes sooner than later.

Joshd12
Brock University
BA. Sports Management, 2014
BA. Recreation and Leisure Studies

by joshd12 on Sep 9, 2011 5:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Terrible news. I hope Zach’s wrong, or that Travis is way overestimating how long he’ll be out. If he’s gone 6 months, I don’t know how positive I could be about the season.

by njdss4 on Sep 9, 2011 5:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Paging Adam Henrique…

Hell on Ice/In Lou We Trust/Twitter
That's it. I'm sending you to El Paso to live with your real parents.

by Kevin Sellathamby on Sep 9, 2011 7:13 PM EDT reply actions  

This is my official reaction to this news.

There is nothing quite as satisfying as out running security after you've punched out a Flyers fan!
"I was in the moment, and the moment said smack you." - Bruce Willis

by slackdog_rm on Sep 9, 2011 7:19 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Yeah, this could describe mine as well.

by NJDOhio on Sep 9, 2011 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

A lot of people were saying this when Zajac got hurt initially. I think January 1 is the date to shoot for.

Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines

by Triumph44 on Sep 9, 2011 7:29 PM EDT reply actions  

Fiddlesticks.

Status quo.

by nyynygnjd on Sep 9, 2011 9:15 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Sorry for the harsh language

Status quo.

by nyynygnjd on Sep 9, 2011 9:15 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

re

I believe Elias should center parise/tedenby while Josephson centers Kovy with either Palmieri or Zubs on the right here. I know some are concerned with JJs’ age and/or lack of experience. I have 2 words- Scott Gomez. Gomez was our second line center in his rookie campaign and just 18 years old. We still won a cup. With not only rookie 2nd and 4th line centerman (Gomez, Madden), but with 2 rookies patrolling our blueline (Rafalski, White). I think Josephson should get a shot at the job we drafted him for. He has bulked up over the summer and seems ready. If it doesn’t work, then try something different.

by JerzeeD on Sep 9, 2011 9:38 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

It’s spelled Josefson.

There is nothing quite as satisfying as out running security after you've punched out a Flyers fan!
"I was in the moment, and the moment said smack you." - Bruce Willis

by slackdog_rm on Sep 9, 2011 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

While I agree Josefson should be fine. He hasn’t shown Scott Gomez talent…..yet.

by NJDOhio on Sep 9, 2011 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is shocking, to say the least.

Why is this shocking? While it’s yet to be confirmed, and we probably won’t know just how long it’s going to take until he actually gets back on the ice for the first time, GMs et al. always downplay these things. When was the last time someone was back when Lou said he would be?

It’s a pretty serious injury and the original estimate seemed awfully optimistic to me… this one seems more realistic.

by elesias on Sep 9, 2011 10:51 PM EDT reply actions  

It’s shocking because the original news came out on August 18 and now that it’s 3 weeks later, only now do we learn that the recovery time may be longer. I’m aware that setbacks and second opinions and so forth can change this; but it’s still surprising that we find this out now. Moreover, consider the source. The information that Zajac may take longer to return came from Zach Parise relaying something Zajac told him in an interview with Chere. It didn’t come Zajac’s people, the team, or any other outlet. Does this mean we never would have known if Parise didn’t mention it in conversing with Chere today? That question shocks me.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Sep 9, 2011 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I agree with what you’re saying John. Very shocking considering the source. I’m a little hesitant to put too much stock into what Parise said regardless of the fact that these type of lower body injuries typically take much longer to heal simply because it’s not an official source. But I hope it was an over exaggeration.

"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit." -Aristotle

by Tim G on Sep 10, 2011 12:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

GMs et al. always downplay these things. When was the last time someone was back when Lou said he would be?

i don’t think this is true, if anything for well-known long-term injuries i think GMs tend to overestimate.

Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines

by Triumph44 on Sep 10, 2011 12:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

He was overly-optimistic, for lack of a better word, with both Parise and Brodeur. I don’t begrudge him for it, it’s part of the business.

by elesias on Sep 10, 2011 8:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

zajacs been one of my favourites for the past few years, parise said it best we use him on the pk and pp and hes our number one center. if its actually 6 months i dont know what to think..

by Zubrus on Sep 10, 2011 1:05 AM EDT via iPhone app reply actions  

Adam Mair?

Seriously though, our boys will be fine, and I’m not throwing in the towel on a second straight first half for this team. This is going to give the rooks a chance to step up, and step up they will.

Also, if Lou says not to worry about his cap, we had better not worry about his injury timeframes either. You wouldn’t like him when he’s angry…

by SatanicStickholders on Sep 10, 2011 12:22 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the New Jersey Devils! New here? Check out the Rules and Guidelines before posting.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

The_official_web_site___new_jersey_devils_small
FOR THE LOVE OF THE DEVILS...PLEASE DON'T SELL YOUR TICKETS TO RANGERS FANS

Recent FanPosts

Tdevilsg_small
GAME SIX SIGN IN
Small
A Paean to Ilya Kovalchuk
A_s_game_small
Game 6 tickets
31519_397927484582_78722009582_3938348_414926_n_small
Goal Bar Seats
Small
Games Played in the Conference Playoffs: A History Lesson
Small
Line Changes...Again
Small
Cup or Bust?
Claude_small
Post your press conference question(s) for John Tortorella here.
Pig_face_small
Mar-ty, Hen-ke
Small
Top Secret Agent or Cranky Middle Aged Man?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

joomla visitors

Managers

Stanley_cup_and_you_-_sbn_small John Fischer

Authors

Puddy_small Tom Stivali

Marty_sbetter_small Matthew Ventolo

Zidlickymania_small Kevin Sellathamby

1729_small Matt Evans SNC