Puck Movement, Player Movement, The Canucks Powerplay and the Devils Powerplay
There is nothing I can really say about the Devils power play except that it is horrible. It's one thing that the team doesn't convert on them and it's another that they get scored on during them, when they should be scoring. While they're not last in the league in conversion percentage, they own the worst powerplay in the league on the basis of it not functioning well. The problems with the powerplay are well documented. Despite it continuing to fail, there doesn't seem to be any significant changes with the power play. I think the problems with the powerplay have less to do with the personnel, but rather the puck movement and where it occurs.
If there's one thing i've been noticing with the Devils powerplay, it's that a lot of the puck movement occurs at the back end. There are always three guys handling the puck- Ilya Kovalchuk, the Defenseman at the point (Adam Larsson, Kurtis Foster or Mark Fayne) and the man on the half boards are always holding the puck. Why? Because they want to set up Ilya Kovalchuk for a shot from the point. In theory, that's a good idea. Kovalchuk's an all world shooter. In practise, it's not so much a good idea. Why? Because of where the puck is moved- the blue line.
Moving the puck on the blueline is riskier because if the puck gets picked off, there's no one except the goalie to defend the breakaway. This isn't foosball where there's two defenders behind everyone else to defend the upcoming shot. That's why the Devils are giving up breakaways on the powerplay- because the other teams know to key in on Kovalchuk, they''ll go after him and pressure him. Moving the puck down low is better because there's a lower risk factor. If the other team does pick off the puck while it's down low, the other team won't get breakaways because the point men will be back there to defend, or the other team will have to clear because they have no avenue of attack.
Another point- point shots aren't very good quality shots. They'll either miss the net completely, or get blocked by another team's player- which is often the case. Just because Kurtis Foster can hammer the puck doesn't mean that the other team won't be willing to block his shot. They need to stop trying to get the one big, low percentage shot from Kovy and focus on getting more high percentage shots closer to the net from the other men on the power play.
Look at how the top ranked powerplay of the Vancouver Canucks succeeds- by moving the puck effectively down low. Here's two good examples of why it's so effective- in this clip of a Canucks PPG against the Oilers, the play down low effectively allows for the two point men to get a better shot, leading to Cody Hodgson tipping in a point shot, while Kevin Bieksa is left alone at the left point, assuming an Oiler would've been able to deter Dan Hamhuis from shooting.
Another reason why the Canucks power play is successful is how they move around. The Devils are very static on the powerplay. I don't see Ilya Kovalchuk pinching in as much as I want to see him. Patrik Elias is often glued to the halfboards. Zach Parise is always behind the net. There's absolutely no movement. I've watched every Canucks powerplay goal this season. Daniel and Henrik Sedin are never in the same place. Here you see Daniel down low and Henrik on the half boards. Here you see Daniel scoring from the left side while Henrik's in the middle. The only guy that doesn't move on that powerplay is Ryan Kesler, who scores pretty much every PPG he's scored in front of the other goalie banging the garbage in. The exception to this is the man in front of the goalie. David Clarkson's PPG against Pittsburgh is an example why he shouldn't- because he'll be there to bang home the garbage. From these examples, you can see why they're successful- they move around and generate quality chances 5v4. The Devils stay in the same place and the other team is fully expecting what will happen next.
This example of a PPG is more relevant to the Devils. Sami Salo, the lone point man is wide open while 4 Canucks distract the Canadiens penalty killers down low. While Salo isn't as threatening from the point as Kovalchuk (but is a significant one regardless), the Devils should consider trying to move around and get Kovalchuk space. If Kovalchuk had that kind of space, he'd probably be able to score a goal like that. But keep in mind that Edler, Salo's partner is up front with the forwards instead of being at the point with Salo. It might be harder to get Kovy the same setup, but the idea remains the same- they can still use Kovy to distract the other team down low and set up Foster or Larsson for a big drive from the point.
With that being said, do you think better movement would help the team out on powerplays? Would it help if the team was less predictable when it came to strategies? Leave your thoughts in the comments.
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Creativity over Predictability
The problem with our power play is that it’s predictable. Why is it predictable? Because it’s the same system that Adam Oates used with Tampa Bay several years ago. Opposing PK coaches have infinite amounts of video to use to break down and therefore defeat the Devils power-play.
They need to replace a broken system with the natural creative talents of their skaters. Just for one Power Play I want to see the Devils just roll their normal lines and take advantage of the fact that the opponent’s are short a skater. The system the Devils are using has worn out its welcome and opposing PK units are destroying it with ease. You can even keep Kovalchuk on the point, just don’t run an umbrella system designed to only feed the puck to him.
1: Parise-Henrique-Clarkson-Kovalchuk-Larsson
2: Sykora-Elias-Zubrus-Kovalchuk-Foster
Adam Oates system works in theory, but the problem is that it works so well in theory that other coaches have already worked out how to break it down. Just let the guys go out there and play hockey and I guarantee they’ll start putting up goals on the power play.
Check out The Crash Line Blog: www.thecrashline.com
actually, last night, im pretty sure they moved henrique up to play with kovym/zach on pp1 and elias with zubes/sykora on pp2. they should keep this moving forward.
by JTdevs on Jan 3, 2012 11:45 AM EST via Android app up reply actions
I noticed those “line changes” as well, but I don’t think it was part of the plan. It seems to me that the personnel often gets shuffled at times depending on who ends up drawing the penalty, given the “normal” personnel configurations include players from multiple lines. This is particularly true if one of the top two lines draws a penalty at the end of a lengthy shift — that precludes either of the “standard” configurations from being out there because PDB won’t want to keep players out there when they need a breather (Kovalchuk excepted).
like kevin said, its all about movement. puck movement player movement. the one thing i want to add is also the players absolutlely need to keep their feet moving , especially when they possess the puck. this is one of the biggest problems we have imo. when things start to go really wrong is when the guys stand still and become stagnant, especially with possession of the puck. The devils need quicker passes in general, more puck movmement as kevin described. but when a player does choose to possess the puck for a few extra seconds, for god sakes keep your feet moving if your going to hold in one spot!
as far as the system we employ, i was watching chicagos power play vs detroit last week and they roll exactly the same formation as the devils. main differences:
1) as kevin pointed out the puck does not go back and forth up top. it goes down low also, behind the net and back up.
2) player movement with or without the puck. players without the puck are moving around , players with the puck are constantly moving their feet, and generally not holding too long
3) shots. need more pucks on net not just from the point. eliasm/henrique need to slide in quicker ad rip more low shots frolm the half boards, these will have a high probability of a rebound kicked out in front for our garbage collector, clarkson or sykora.
im not relieving oatesof blame here, thats for sure. But i dont think its the general formation that is the problem. its the movmement of the players (or lack of) and the puck in a timely manner that is the biggest problem.
by JTdevs on Jan 3, 2012 12:02 PM EST via Android app up reply actions
Do the Devils have anyone like the Sedins? Does anyone?
I think it’s a relevant point that keeping the puck up top results in more chances against, but last year’s power play was run generally the same and opposing teams had far fewer goals and far fewer shots/60 against. DeBoer mentioned the other day that pretty much all power plays are run out of the same basic formations.
Also you can’t on the one hand say that you don’t like all the shorthanded chances against and then command Kovalchuk to pinch down more. Him pinching down is bound to result in more shorthanded chances.
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
The way that Elias and Sykora can find each other is probably the closest thing we have to the Sedins. Zubrus is our Alex Burrows.
I think the key to Kovalchuk pinching in is the rest of the skaters cycling. If Kovy pinches in the Foster needs to cycle over to cover his point and Henrique needs to drop back to Foster’s point and then Kovy is on the opposite half-boards, Clarkson is in front and Parise can either stay behind the net or switch spots with Kovalchuk like in a cycle.
The Devils offense is good. They cycle the puck well at evens and they get shots on net at evens. I think the Power Play should look more like we do at evens.
The Sedins move the puck well at evens and on the power play. I don’t think there’s much of a change in style for them.
Check out The Crash Line Blog: www.thecrashline.com
On the contrary, the Devils generate fewer shots at even strength than most teams. Their power play and 5 on 5 rank in shots for per 60 minutes is equal.
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
Do the Devils have anyone like the Sedins? Does anyone?
No, the Devils don’t have the Sedin twins, but they do have Zach Parise and Patrik Elias. And that’s not too shabby – not to mention Kovalchuk on the other side of the ice is a superior shooter to Bieksa, Edler, or Salo. Few goalies, if any, are at Patrick Roy’s level but a lot get pretty good results by emulating the butterfly style he brought to the highest level. Likewise, the Devils have something to learn from the Sedins and the Canucks’ PP.
last year’s power play was run generally the same and opposing teams had far fewer goals and far fewer shots/60 against
If you keep insisting on the same strategy without variation, teams will learn to beat it. And the PK that works is to put tons of pressure on the three points around the umbrella – and we’re seeing a combination effect of every team learning to apply that pressure combined with the Devils’ own failing confidence in their PP.
Him pinching down is bound to result in more shorthanded chances.
Kovalchuk pinching down only makes sense in a paradigm where the puck is more frequently handled down low by Parise. There’s no suggestion here that Foster and Elias play with the puck at the points while Kovalchuk heads to the front of the net. On the other hand, if Parise is handling the puck more frequently out of the corner, the penalty killers are drawn further down below the hash marks as well as facing more toward their own goal more than facing the Devils’ goal. To generate a shorthanded chance, they’d have to take the puck, pivot around and take two extra strides to get out of their own zone. Those two extra strides in the zone not only mean they have further to go to get to the Devils’ goal, but also give Elias and Kovalchuk more time to press them into a turnover and make them much more likely to ice the puck rather than try to carry it out themselves.
So, the point isn’t that Kovalchuk’s pinching is going to prevent shorthanded chances in and of itself, but that attacking from more of a down-low position will help reduce shorthanded chances against, and Kovalchuk’s pinching further forces the penalty killers to collapse down low.
by dr(d)evil on Jan 3, 2012 9:50 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Oy. Where do I begin.
First of all, can we please, and I’m begging here for the sanity of our power play, can we please somehow have Pete DeBoer read this?
Now that I’m done with my mini-rant, I’ll comment on the post itself. =D
The way our power play is being run right now isn’t working. Having Kovy on the point trying to hammer shots home doesn’t allow for as many chances to score as we should have. Plus the risk of turnovers is too risky. We need to move Kovy down from the point. Or rather, we need Movement. Just like Kevin said, we need Movement. If we had movement on the power play, I think we would be well better off. It would solve the problems that our power play currently has, and it would allow for better chances to score. Movement!
I agree with both of Alamouth’s comments and this comment by Kevin
They need to stop trying to get the one big, low percentage shot from Kovy and focus on getting more high percentage shots closer to the net from the other men on the power play.
We can break this down from watching so many games, a paid coach likely does the same thing.
A shot wide on the Power Play is nearly the same as giving the puck away. Usually Kovy’s shot is so hard, it rattles around the boards completely.
What I think the Devils need is another Rafalski type point PP man. It doesn’t have to be a defenseman or someone like Foster with a big shot. Just someone who has good eyes and shoots for a tip. This could be Kovy, but DeBoer/ Oates would have a tough time coaching out his instinct to hammer the shot.
I would throw Zubrus in front, with Parise down low. I would also put Kovy down low. Try something different. Two defenseman on the point who shoot for tips.
I think it’s a valid question to ask if the other players feel obligated to pass to Kovy when he’s out there, even at lower percentages, but then again, that might earn me a #blameKovy hashtag, which is not my intention here.
I have respect for most sports fans with 2 exceptions: NY Ranger fans who grew up in New Jersey, and Dallas Cowboy fans who can't name the capital of Texas.
I think the Devils need is another Rafalski type point PP man.
Mark Fayne already does this. Not as well as Rafalski did, but he has that softer, deflectable shot and he finds a way to get it on goal. Adam Larsson can be taught to do this sort of thing as well…. but I’d just as soon keep him off the PP and try to keep his TOI down this season.
Even if that could not work, the thing that really annoys me is to see a coaching staff that doesn’t try anything different. The shorthanded goals are already a big problem… And the PP ineffectiveness is just the icing on the cake.
this is unacceptable.
"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"
Something I'm curious to know...
What type of power play system did Kovy have when he was with ATL? I’m assuming it is the same as this, but I’m curious to know.
Also, how many PPGs has Kovy had with us?
They all just seem to get too relaxed on the power play, trying to play it at a different pace to the 5-on-5 or even 4-on-5.
- Entering the zone: Why are they dumping and chasing? Last night especially there were times the puck was just cleared again. The passes to a player straddling the blue-line work better if they are struggling to just penetrate the zone.
- More movement: sometimes the penalty killers are just allowed to stand still whilst the puck in cycled around the umbrella.
Those are the two biggest problems I see with the power play.
Devils fan from the UK
I agree 100% Kevin. The Devils need to get the puck down low and not just move it around from Kovy to Foster to Elias and back. It makes no sense that Zach Parise, arguably our best player, hardly touches the puck on the PP.
And I agree that moving the puck along the blueline too much is causing all these shorthanded goals. Not moving the puck down low with enough frequency allows the killers to be more aggressive on the pointmen, and that kind of confidence to press the pointmen results in the killers getting their momentum headed toward the Devils’ goal even before the turnover is committed.
Finally, what Oates ran in Tampa Bay is subtly but critically different from what’s run here in NJ. I have some very vivid memories of Stamkos moving from Kovalchuk’s current position but occasionally stepping into the high slot in the middle of the box to take a short pass from St Louis off the half boards (from Elias’ position) to whip a wrister in for a goal.
It makes no sense that Zach Parise, arguably our best player, hardly touches the puck on the PP.
You mean you don’t think he’s being utilized properly by sitting behind the goal line and never touching the puck, aside from the occasional attempt to move in front and stuff it through the goalie’s pads?
Zach Parise is not our best player at handling the puck on the power play. His ability is to tip pucks and create screens, he is where he should be. One problem with the current PP set up is that it’s predicated on the idea that Kovalchuk can beat people from way out high, which on occasion he can, but if he doesn’t, the puck rarely ends up somewhere where a Devils player can get to it.
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
Zach Parise is not our best player at handling the puck on the power play
We hardly get to see him handle the puck on the PP. I’m not saying he’d be better than Elias, but he’s in a more difficult position than Elias – there’s less room to maneuver down low in the corner, and the only safe passing option is to Elias, whereas Elias always has two safe options to go to – Foster or Parise. The point is that the puck gets to Parise so infrequently, with such little movement of players like Kovalchuk and Clarkson, that there’s zero attack generated from below the hash marks.
His ability is to tip pucks and create screens, he is where he should be
No, that’s Clarkson’s job currently. Once the Devils are set up, Parise is rarely positioned around the crease. If anything, his job is to clean up rebounds that pop out to his corner, but those are few and far between.
If you really want Zach Parise using his talent at deflecting pucks and banging in rebounds, the best place to put him is in harm’s way in Clarkson’s current position. There’s nothing wrong with that strategy. It also opens up the Elias hard pass/intentionally wide shot to the middle where Parise is for a redirection on net – that worked well for Elias and Gomez a few years back (doesn’t work now because Clarkson is a righty shot). I’d then put Henrique in the low corner position – a lefty that can pass and battle for corner pucks with at least a decent nose for the net and a knack for arriving at the right time.
But personally, I think the best lineup would be to send Zajac (a better puckhanlder and passer) in place of Clarkson and have the flexibility of putting Zajac in the left corner with Parise in front or Parise in the corner with Zajac in front. Then, you can overload either side of the ice and give the PP a new look. Kovalchuk could handle the puck from the left side to Foster at the top of the umbrella – if the PK is slow to rotate then he can dish it over the Elias for a one-timer, if they’re too quick to rotate he can quickly dish it right back to Kovalchuk and if they take away his passing options he has an open straight-on shot with Parise in front.
Use Tedenby for crying out loud
Anybody notice what happened against the Senators when the Devils put him on the ice, at the end of the PP extending into even strength? By himself, he put more pressure on goal than the PP did for their entire 2 minutes. You want creativity? You want somebody hanging around down low to knock in the garbage or pass to a shooter in front? Give him a shot. His size won’t matter on the PP, and if the defense swarms on him, he is exactly the guy who will find the open man.
The right thing to do with Teddy was to send him to to Albany and work on his defense. It may be too late for that to make any difference this season. So do the next best thing and use him on the PP, where he would be a weapon.
Fire Oates already
watching last night’s game made me realize how spot-on this summary was. I’m amazed that DeBoer, Oates, and the rest of the coaching staff is so obliviously stupid and stubborn and unwilling to change anything about the power play. Especially after looking at the numbers. They make me sick. 19 power play goals. 13 SHGA (counting the one last night that was a second afterwards)

by 
























