Lucky & Good New Jersey Devils Dramatically Beat Hated New York Rangers in 4-3 Shootout Win
Tonight, the New Jersey Devils came from behind to tie the New York Rangers twice late in regulation. The game itself was frenetic and fitting for two rival teams that simply dislike each other given the pace and physical actions. The Rangers did their best to go up in the game; but the Devils kept fighting back and were rewarded for their efforts. Close calls in overtime were just that and so a shootout was necessary. Thankfully, this game would have a winner. Ilya Kovalchuk and Martin Brodeur sealed it to make it a 4-3 shootout win. The Devils' three game winless (and only one goal scored) streak was snapped; and it happened against those blue fellows from across the river in an exciting, dramatic, and tense fashion.
As I left the Rock and headed towards Newark Penn Station, a Rangers fan had something to say as I walked by with the confidence that comes with seeing a hated rival lose. It was an older gentleman, clad in a Rangers-branded tracksuit. He stated: "It's better to be lucky than good sometimes, huh?" With the high of a hard-fought, dramatic victory over a rival in mind, I just snapped "That's the story of the Rangers season." Truthfully, it wasn't most witty response. It didn't necessitate a response. However, what he said did stick with me from the whole trip back home to write this very recap.
At the time, I felt it was a put down. Perhaps that was the intent. He was a fan of a rival unhappy to see their team blow a lead late in the game twice. He didn't look pleased when he said what he said. It certainly wasn't a compliment. I thought about it some more and I think he sort of hit on something.
Let's take a step back first. The New Jersey Devils went into the All Star Game break with a 2-1 shootout loss to Buffalo. That was a game where the Devils did everything right except score two goals. They came close in regulation. They came close in overtime. It didn't happen. In fact, the Sabres only scored in regulation due to a fortuitous bounce off the glass that laid a puck right out in front for Buffalo to poke in. The Devils outplayed the Sabres, but they didn't get enough breaks despite their efforts - and they lost in a shootout. The Devils were good, but not lucky and they didn't get the desired result.
Now let's jump to tonight, the Devils hosted the Rangers and had an uneven performance of sorts. The Devils did well enough on offense (+2 in team Corsi) but it took until the second period before it really germinated. And it wasn't even all that pressing in the third. The Devils defense seemingly jumped from playing solid in their own end to sheer panic at times. Frustrating to witness and it burned the Devils a couple of times. Martin Brodeur made several huge stops to bail out the skaters; but still let up a soft one late after Ilya Kovalchuk's equalizer. And the Devils did get their share of big breaks. The Devils fought back to tie the game 3-3, but it may not have happened if Greene's dump-in hit the glass itself or the boards as intended - or if David Clarkson wasn't charging through the center of the ice for the puck. The first third period equalizer may not have happened if the Rangers cleared the puck on their third PK instead of attempting to attack, which led to the odd-man rush. The shootout wouldn't have happened if Derek Stepan curled that puck into the net in OT instead of pushing it laterally across the line; or if Andy Greene didn't clear it away quickly enough. The Devils were lucky to get a point tonight with that in mind. The Rangers did enough to win and seemingly iced the game when Michael Del Zotto scored that third goal. The Devils were lucky to get the opportunities to equalize twice in the third period.
The key here is that the Devils made the most of those opportunities that they were fortunate to get. Kovalchuk made sure the odd-man rush wasn't just an opportunity; Clarkson made Biron pay for keeping his legs open after the bad bounce; Greene did clear the puck; and the Devils did make sure the Rangers didn't get anything easy on net in OT (or anything at all per the scorer).
The man almost had it right: the Devils were lucky. They were also good enough to not squander it as they got a result. And the Devils did just that. That's just how it is in hockey - like in all sports.
As usual, I have more thoughts on tonight's game after the jump as well as links to the game's stats and a highlight video from NHL.com. For the opposition's point of view, please check out Bryan Winter's recap over at Blueshirt Banter. He's not happy about the bounce that led to Clarkson's goal and I can't say I blame him. Sometimes, it's better to be lucky (and close your five hole) than good.
The Stats: The NHL.com Game Summary | The NHL.com Event Summary | The NHL.com Play by Play Log | The NHL.com Shot Summary | The Time on Ice Shift Charts | The Time on Ice Head to Head Ice Time Charts | The Time on Ice Corsi Charts
The Highlight Video: From NHL.com, here's the highlight video of tonight's game. Yes, it was that up and down at the game late. Thankfully, it ended the way it did!
Marty! (Or A Lot of Words About Goalies): It sounds strange to laud a goaltender who got beaten three times on 22 shots at even strength, but I really do think Martin Brodeur was a big reason why the Devils won this game. He bailed out the Devils three times in the first period; stoned Brad Richards on a breakaway when he split an unaware Kurtis Foster and Bryce Salvador in the second period among his other stops. Just as importantly, he denied Marian Gaborik and Richards in the shootout which gave the team the win. Brodeur was big.
Brodeur wasn't perfect, as evidenced by the 3 GA-out-of-26 SOGs stat. As for the goals that beat him, I can only really fault him on the third one. Brodeur tried to kick Gaborik's initial shot away but it went awry. Kurtis Foster was in position to either play the puck or do something about a breaking Anton Stralman and did neither. That's how the first one happened and it happened minutes after Brodeur made three huge stops as the skaters in front of him looked like AHLers for a shift. Brian Boyle got behind Foster in the third period and got Stu Bickel's pass. Boyle had Brodeur one-on-one and Boyle knew he just had to wait Brodeur out. Brodeur tried valiantly but Boyle's aim was true. The goal by Michael Del Zotto should have been stopped; it was from distance and he clearly saw it. That was bad. But if wasn't for Brodeur's huge saves earlier or in the shootout, the Devils get zero out of this one instead of one or two points.
Jumping over to the other Martin who played goaltender tonight, Martin Biron had a little more work to do in terms of total shots. He faced three more shots than Brodeur and let up as many goals. Biron had a few impressive stops; though I think he wished he would have had two of those three goals allowed back. There's no shame on the first one. Zach Parise beat Bickel to his own rebound and attempted a sharp angle shot. Biron could have covered up the post better; but Parise's shot had to be pin-point to get into the net from where he was. It was more of a case of it being a fantastic shot rather than bad goaltending. Biron got frozen twice by Kovalchuk, first on the PPG in the third period (beaten to his left) and later on in the shootout (beaten five hole). Yeah, Biron did come up big on a shorthanded breakaway by Kovalchuk early in the third period; but he could have done something of note on those two blasts from Kovalchuk's stick. Then there's the infamous Clarkson goal. Yes, it was a bad bounce, Rangers fans. I don't see how that excuses Biron leaving his five hole open. Some would say that was bad goaltending.
Snark aside, Biron did do well enough in the shootout on Zach Parise and Patrik Elias among other stops and the loss can't be fully placed on New York's Marty. Biron didn't get torched on D or take a risk during a PK that ended up coming the other way. Though, it does make one wonder whether Henrik Lundqvist would have done better if he got the start.
The Return of Andy Greene: In the preview, I felt taking out of either Matt Taormina or Kurtis Foster would have made sense for Andy Greene to return. Greene hasn't played a game since early December and in replacing Taormina, Peter DeBoer could limit his minutes and protect him somewhat. While the lineup move I expected happened, DeBoer didn't limit Greene at all. No, the two-way defenseman played 22:55 total, with 21:16 coming at even strength. In terms of competition, he saw a significant amount of Gaborik, Richards, Carl Hagelin, Brandon Dubinsky, Ryan Callahan, and Stepan. Those are top forwards on the Rangers; definitely not limited competition.
The Rangers mixed up their match-ups but Greene came out ahead for the most part. He finished a +8 in Corsi to go with an assist on Clarkson's equalizer. He got thrown into the fire and came out without being horribly burnt. That's enough to say that Greene had a successful return. I will say he started off slowly and he did take an offensive zone tripping call. I could defend that call based on the fact that if he didn't, the Rangers could have easily had an odd-man rush going the other way. Still, he was caught and that mistake was made. Then there was the memorable sequence where he got beat by Stepan in OT and then cleared his little attempt around the post off the line. A mixture of horrifying and amazing in a matter of seconds from #6. Nevertheless, it was good to see him back.
The Debut of Steve Bernier: The Devils signed Steve Bernier to a two-way deal earlier this week and he started on the third line alongside Jacob Josefson and Alexei Ponikarovsky. Did Bernier have a big game? Not really. He only had one shot on goal among his 13:30 of ice time mostly against the Rangers' third and fourth lines. Bernier did get a little power play time, too. What was impressive was that he was a +7 in Corsi by the end of the night. While he wasn't generating the offense himself, good things continued to happen and he certainly wasn't a liability on the ice. At a minimum, his night was more beneficial than what we saw from, say, Tim Sestito. It was just one game, though; but I'd keep an eye on him among the bottom six.
Defensive Mixups: Normally, holding a NHL team to 26 shots in 65 minutes is pretty good. It's not amazing; but it's nothing to complain about in the big picture. The Devils have been very good at keeping the other team's shot count low this season. Yet, it's striking how the Devils defense is perceived to be porous by some/many fans. In the big picture, there's really not much to complain about. Tonight's game provided some great examples of why this perception exists and grows. There were entire shifts where the Devils just chased the Rangers around to no avail until Brodeur made a big stop or the puck was played out or something, particularly in the first period.
Peter DeBoer did switch up the blueline to some degree. Kurtis Foster, who looked awful on the first two goals against, got paired with Bryce Salvador, who took Clarkson's fall-down powers for the evening; and they were limited in minutes together. It may have helped Foster in terms of Corsi, who ended up even, but not in defensive zone decision making. Greene held with Mark Fayne, which was mostly good. Adam Larsson got together with Anton Volchenkov and that helped out Larsson a bit. And there must have been some further switches as Larsson's 26:31 performance included significant time with Greene at evens. I suspect DeBoer should have kept him with Volchenkov as Volchenkov ended the night at +5 Corsi while Larsson got hit with -7 like Salvador.
What was interesting is that John Tortorella mixed up the usage of his forward lines. I don't know whether that was in response to anything the Devils were doing, or how they were doing against New Jersey's defense. It did keep any of the Rangers forwards from putting in 20 minutes of work; so it may have been by design that way. Maybe he should have done that for his defenders; Dan Girardi played a mind-boggling 33:46 (25:59 at evens, +5 in Corsi) and Ryan McDonagh ate up 29:11 (26:00 at evens, +8 Corsi). The pairing did do very well, so I guess I can't blame the Rangers for leaning on those two tonight. Who knows how they'll do tomorrow in Buffalo, though.
Third Period Ilya: Ilya Kovalchuk led the Devils in shots on net with 5 and in attempts with 7 (aside: believe it or not Foster had 6 attempts - at least Foster tried hard on offense). The interesting thing about it is that Kovalchuk didn't really get going until the third period. In the first period, things just didn't go right. Passes went off his stick, or his passes went off his target's stick. He lost possession in attempting to drive to the net a few times. Kovalchuk just didn't seem threatening early on.
Kovalchuk more than made up for it in the third period with 4 shots on net, including a shorthanded breakaway and a power play goal. The breakaway attempt was a good one; Biron came up big on a stop there. The good news was that it didn't deter #17 from attacking. He roared on and his shot off the rush on the power play was sublime. Kovalchuk very nearly got a second goal in OT when he was just a bit late at getting to a loose puck at the right post. In terms of possession, Kovalchuk was a -1 in Corsi over 20:41 of even strength ice time. Not great, but not terrible either. I wish Kovalchuk did more earlier in the game, but he did quite well in the third period to be notable for the evening.
Did You Know: Patrik Elias set up Kovalchuk's goal on the power play, which was an important goal at the time. That is something you probably know from tonight. Did you know that Patrik Elias also put up 4 shots on net and went 11-for-16 on faceoffs? Well, now you do. However, he was a -4 in Corsi; so it wasn't all glitter and star stickers for his performance. Strangely, Petr Sykora didn't look so good in the defensive zone and wasn't as active as Elias (no surprise there, Sykora's a winger, he doesn't have the same responsibilities); yet he was a +2 in Corsi.
Come Back Soon, Henrique: With Adam Henrique out with a groin injury, Dainius Zubrus was centering Zach Parise and Kovalchuk; and Clarkson was with Elias and Sykora. Zubrus didn't do a whole lot in terms of production with no shots on net, or in possession with a -3 in Corsi. Big Z was a disappointing 4-for-11 on faceoffs too. I'm not sure why he got 16:47 in even strength minutes tonight, but he did. Still, Zubrus nearly became the hero of the night when he nearly found an opening by the right post in OT. Ryan McDonagh's stick check prevented him from pounding it in, though. (Aside to Rangers fans: Yes, this was a close call that went your team's way just like Stepan's failed attempt did for NJ later in OT. It was good fortune for NY.)
Clarkson was a hero for firing a puck between Biron's legs late in the game. Yes, getting the puck all alone in the slot was great luck. But Clarkson finished the play with his own shot. That was great. Other than that, he was a -1 in Corsi and had only one other shot on net. He didn't look so good alongside Elias in my opinion and he was just "there" on the PP. The latter will happen as his job is just to be in the way, it seems. As for the former, well, it may be a bit early after one game. I think Henrique's absence hurts in that Zubrus is better off with Elias, Clarkson is better off on a third line, and Bernier is better off taking the place of Cam Janssen (just making sure you're still reading). Maybe Clarkson will get it together on the "power" line over the next game or two before Henrique is available.
Improvement Before Our Very Eyes: The Devils had three power plays and they got better with each one. The first one was bad as it began with the Rangers getting a shorthanded scoring opportunity and the Devils doing nothing else short of an easy shot on net. The second one wasn't good either and yielded no shots on net; but at least the Rangers weren't in New Jersey's end of the rink at any point. The third one actually saw the Devils get set up, get a shot on net fairly quickly, and converted on their chances thanks to a odd-man rush created by Ryan Callahan losing the puck at New Jersey's blueline. That's improvement. The next step will be playing a game where the other team's penalty killers does not get any sniff of offense all game.
Wham, Biff, Socko, Crunch, Etc.: The referees Francois St Laurent and Steve Kozari let the Devils and Rangers play a rather physical game. There were all kinds of big hits and questionable plays that left fans on both sides wondering where the call was. I leave it to you to decide whether it was a good or bad thing. It definitely was as no Devil or Ranger was unafraid to throw their weight around. That meant players on both sides got away with a few such as Zubrus hooking down John Mitchell during the Rangers' second power play, and Parise being knocked to the ice well away from the puck late in the third off a rush. The refs were content to only call the rather obvious fouls and so they did.
That reminds me of a question for you. How in the world did the Devils put six skaters on the ice while they were defending? Thankfully, the Devils killed that penalty along with the other two with relative ease. It was still a fantastically dumb call to take. As much as I think DeBoer did a good job with adjustments as needed, that was an oversight that could have been costly.
Because All The Points Matter: So the Devils benefited from luck along with their quality tonight and they got two points. While it didn't come in regulation, the win did push the Devils up to seventh place and created a little separation from Florida and more separation from Winnipeg. ROW only matters if there's a tie and right now, there isn't any. Expect to see this phrase a lot: all points matter. Because they do from this point in the season onward.
Lastly: It does feel good to see your favorite team beat a rival.
That's my extended take on tonight's game, now I want to know yours regardless of length or kind of detail. What did you make of the Devils' performance tonight? Would you say they were lucky and good or just lucky (or, somehow, just good)? What did you think of Andy Greene's return? Who on New Jersey impressed you the most? Who on New Jersey disappointed you the most? What would you like to see the Devils do differently against Montreal on Thursday? Please leave your answers and other thoughts on tonight's game in the comments. Apologies for the lack of tweets and comments due to a low mobile battery (my fault); but I thank everyone who followed along in the Gamethread and @InLouWeTrust anyway. Thank you for reading.
87 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great recap.
I couldn’t catch the game as I’m taking a night class now for two days of the week, but I enjoyed reading about it here.
it was one of those really stressful, edge of your seat, waiting for someone to make a mistake big enough to cost their team or reward yours. Missed chances, ugly plays, good plays, end to end play, minimal stoppages. Typical Devs-Rangers game. I think I got a few more greys and lost another week or so off my lifespan, but it was a fun ride. My liver hurts a little today, but he’ll get over it.
I’m not going to lie to you. It felt good and I’m going to do whatever is in my power possible to stay there as long as I can. - Petr Sykora on playing on a line with Elias and Parise.
It felt like playoff hockey. Tough, physical, emotional back-and-forth play with huge goals on both sides.
by Alan Wright on Feb 1, 2012 8:04 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
MSG often replays the game late in the evening, and produces “Rangers/ Devils in 60” by cutting out the chatter. Or there’s Tivo.
by Alan Wright on Feb 1, 2012 8:05 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
The Devils did get lucky.
In fact, the Sabres only scored in regulation due to a fortuitous bounce off the glass that laid a puck right out in front for Buffalo to poke in.
How was Clarkson’s goal any different? You can’t really blame Biron for the goal either. No way he expects to be having to make a save in that in position. Give Clarkson credit for goal though, but he is a professional hockey player and should put that in 10 out of 10 times.
I’m happy they won but the Devils climbing back to tie the game at 2 only to give it up only a couple minutes is still pretty upsetting to me. From that they didn’t deserve to win.
I also take exception another point of yours John.
With the high of a hard-fought, dramatic victory over a rival in mind, I just snapped "That’s the story of the Rangers season.
I know this is a Devils blog and your a Devils fan and you write about the Devils, but can you please give the slightest bit of credit to the Rangers? They’re first place in the conference and you still think they are getting lucky to be there. Advanced stats may point to a fall off happening and it hasn’t happened yet. Right now they are playing like one of the best team’s in the league and it seems like you just don’t care because your a Devils fan. I remember you said when the Devils lost to the Rangers earlier that you didn’t think the Rangers will accomplish anything this year so your just writing them off. I’m a true Devils fan but I still acknowledge the rangers are playing good and deserve to be where they are. I mean they did beat the best team in the league in Boston which is a team that absolutely obliterates us.
I’m happy the Devils won but to say that they should have won is a little ridiculous. Tomorrow at work I’m just going to grin at my Rangers friends and that’s all the trash talk i’ll have to do. I feel like these games get a little bit out of hand and at the end of the day are just another two points in the standings. Sadly you don’t get extra points for beating your biggest rival.
Also, I’m getting worried about all these shootout wins. I’d be really upset at the unlikely occurrence our non regulation wins keep us out of the playoffs.
I don’t want to speak for John, but i think most of us here realize that comments like that one are all in fun and we don’t actually think the Rangers are a horrible hockey team…
by undersuspicion426 on Feb 1, 2012 1:55 AM EST up reply actions
1) I did say the Devils were lucky. Several times in this very recap post, including the headline.
2) I’ll give credit to how I see fit. Again, if you read this very recap post, you would see that. As far as the Rangers go, they’re due for a crash to reality.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Feb 1, 2012 7:39 AM EST via Android app up reply actions
Honest question John, what is reality to you? The 104 points Rob V predicted by season end, or are you still holding to the hope they’ll finish at like 90?
I know you’ll never give them the slightest bit of credit, but c’mon now. Even the guy who hates the Rangers more than anyone I’ve ever heard or read has to see that this is a team that isn’t going away.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 1, 2012 8:46 AM EST up reply actions
Giving credit is a two way street. The Rangers are definitely a good team this year and should make some noise in the playoffs. However, reading the comments on Blueshirt Banter (including last night) would give one the impression that the Devils have only won three cups because of “the trap” and “Fatty” didn’t give up goals because he fills up the entire net.
I give you a ton of credit for coming over here and having rational discussions with us and you’re always welcome here, but you are definitely in the minority amougst Ranger fans, who give us no credit.
I don’t care about the credit, I don’t really need John’s approval (nor would I in a million years expect it). He’s very focused on the ‘luck’ aspect lately, and thus I’m curious exactly to what extent he thinks it is going to hit us.
Also, judging any site by the GDT thread comments is a good way to get yourself aggravated, in a hurry. It irks me when any site is judged by a GDT, let alone ours. It’s no different than going to an arena in a way. If you go into opposing territory, you can expect a lot of nonsense you won’t agree with and probably don’t want to put up with.
As for trapping: Lots of teams ‘trap’, Rangers included. It’s different now because the clutching/grabbing that epitomized 90’s hockey made it look much worse. If we want to harp on luck, you guys were unlucky that you were the poster child of success for that era and not a different one.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 1, 2012 9:33 AM EST up reply actions
Facebook is where I find my Rags aggravation, namely with my brother-in-law and his friends. He calls Clarkson a blind squirrel lucky to get his nut, despite the fact that he’s tied with Callahan now with 17 goals. Still a blind squirrel to him. Another guy complains about the Devils lucky bounce. When I point out that that same bounce bit us a week ago, and that it’s no different than the puck going off of a ref and it’s just crying over spilled milk, this guy retorts with "First place."
Very much to my chagrin, your beloved Rags are doing very well this season, and I can’t stand it (no offense). Nothing would make me happier than to see them plummet in the standings in a belated attempt to Fail for Nail. Sadly, I don’t see that happening. It would be nice though if sometimes you could get into a respectable conversation with a fan of Our Hated Rivals (yourself being the lone exception).
After the first half of last season, I don’t think any team (at least in our division, but maybe the entire NHL) can talk to us about bad bounces and luck. Sure, MacLean was to blame for a lot, but other forces were at work there too to create the perfect storm of hockey frustration.
To look at things from another perspective and argue with myself for a minute, skill can outduel luck in most cases, like how Boston plays their game. For instance, if the Rangers were skilled enough to go up by two goals in the third period, that “lucky bounce” means nothing. Much like if we were skilled during our games last week, those bounces wouldn’t matter either.
by SatanicStickholders on Feb 1, 2012 9:46 AM EST up reply actions
You chose them to be your facebook friends/family. I can’t help you there. lol
I dunno if they’ll plummet in the standings. I think they’re better than the Flyers, and I’m hoping they had enough of a cushion to hold off the Pens, but I’m doubting that more by the day. I still figure them for 106-108 points by year end. It’d be a pretty bad beat for that to end up as the 5 seed, but the Atlantic is brutal this year.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 1, 2012 10:12 AM EST up reply actions
They’ll finish around 4-6 in the East as the Flyers surpass them for first. Possibly the Pens too should they get healthy and/or Fleury gets hot.
Just because I’m not crowning the Rangers after blowing two third period leads doesn’t mean I think they’ll crash out the top 8. Relax.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Feb 1, 2012 9:45 AM EST via Android app up reply actions
I’m not sure that either team is better than the Rangers. The Rangers are no longer the 45% Fenwick team with a 1025 PDO.
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
But they are still the team with the goalie playing over his head. I think Henrik comes back to earth down the stretch, and John is right about the 4-6 finish (probably 4 or 5)
But being 4 or 5 could mean they’re only one point behind the division leader. They could be 2nd in the conference yet still be in 4th as far as playoffs go. Nothing to be ashamed of there.
by Alan Wright on Feb 1, 2012 10:53 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
No, there really isn’t. But I can see how it would be for thin-skinned fans or poor readers.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Feb 1, 2012 1:47 PM EST via Android app up reply actions
The Sabres goal, the Stralman goal, the Parise goal, the Boyle goal, and the Clarkson goal were all good bounces which fell on the stick of highly-trained professional. Physics put the puck there and good training or a lucky guess + hard work put the player there make the play. (In particular, Parise for fighting his way in on his rebound and Boyle for being patient).
But even great luck needs skill. This time, the Devils eeked out a win against a deceptively strong Rangers team. I’m of the view that the Rangers are over-achieving and are due to slack off a little, but they’re still very skill, aggressive, and dangerous.
by Alan Wright on Feb 1, 2012 8:16 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
You know, if the Devils win 2/3 of the rest of their games, all in the shootout, they’ll still have 101 points. It’s not the shootout wins that are a concern. It’s the non-wins in any of the others. Win enough, whether it’s in the shootout or not, and the playoffs are a given. Lose enough, and they’re not.
Go Devils
Go Jets
Dear Devils,
Look, you can win without Cam Janssen in the line-up.
If its a money thing, I’ll buy him the bus ticket to Albany.
Love,
a Fan
I’m not going to lie to you. It felt good and I’m going to do whatever is in my power possible to stay there as long as I can. - Petr Sykora on playing on a line with Elias and Parise.
You shouldn't have to pay
Those of us in Albany already pay $22 to sit center ice near the top of the lower bowl
FWIW – I had scoring chances at 16-12 NYR last night on the first pass. My kids were being a pain in the ass so I want to go through the first half of the 2nd period again just to make sure.
Very streaky game…Rangers had the first 3, then Devils 3, then Rangers 4, then Devils 3, then Rangers 4, then Devils 3 of 4, then Rangers 3, Devils 3, and the last one was Rangers. Kovalchuk had a direct hand (either the chance or the primary assist) on 8 of the 12.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
That’s good stuff George, be interested to see the final tallys. Not surprised Kovy was involved in most of them. Would be interested to see what Devils defenders were on the ice for the Rangers 16 chances.
In Lou We Trust: SBN Blog of the New Jersey Devils
I’ll script it out and post it here, but it’ll be a day or two.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 1, 2012 8:54 AM EST up reply actions
No, I thought that the Rangers are the Manhattan Island-ers. I guess that’s where Tex Rickard had his home, home on the range.
by Alan Wright on Feb 1, 2012 8:53 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Other than the 3rd Ranger goal, I thought Marty was brilliant. Kovy and Parise were flying all night….Foster is a liability and I agree he looked awful on the first two Ranger goals. He doesn’t cover his man and doesn’t move his man out of the crease. We were fortunate to win but there have been times we’ve outplayed the opposition and they got the breaks. We’ll take the two points……
DeBoer has to address playing Foster regularly. He just is not an NHL top six d-man.
Nice write-up, John. Luck played a factor for both teams tonight, so it bothers me to hear it from some of the Ranger fans locally that they think they somehow deserved the win more.
This article bothered me even more.
Does everyone really think the Rangers are so good they can only lose if the other team cheats fate? Surely they will make the playoffs, but it’s arrogant and shows lack of hockey sense to discredit a win by the Devils because it came against the Blueshirts.
I agree with HouseRich in saying it is a two-way street. This blog has given the Ranger’s plenty of credit through all of the friendly banter…I wish we could see the same not only from Ranger fans but from professionals writing the stupid articles like the one I linked to in this comment.
by SatanicStickholders on Feb 1, 2012 9:22 AM EST reply actions
Does everyone really think the Rangers are so good they can only lose if the other team cheats fate?
What is the event in the game that most effected the final result? Of course that’s going to be the focus of articles, mainstream or otherwise. This part has nothing to do with credit. A stanchion cost the Rangers a point in the standings. If you want to talk expected value, it probably actually cost them 0.5, plus or minus. In any game, that’s a pretty big swing, and should rightfully be the focus.
Yes, Clarkson has to be there to capitalize.
Yes, he has to actually do so.
Yes, they still had to win the skills competition.
Yes, he and they deserve the credit for doing so.
Side tangent, in a way, I’m kinda sick of these 1-goal NJD-NYR games. Every one seems to turn into a mini-drama.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 1, 2012 9:43 AM EST up reply actions
I agree about the 1 goal games. As I mentioned in a comment above, skill can overtake luck, and we see truly elite teams doing this all the time. Score two goals to ice the game in the last 5 minutes and no bonehead articles that make the authors look like writers for a high school yearbook are published.
The Devils could not score more than 1 goal per game the week before the break, and the bounces frustrated us and tore us up inside. The fact is, if we were skilled enough, those bounces wouldn’t matter. That’s not a knock against the Rangers as much as it sounds like it is, it’s just a general observation about hockey and sports.
I know you get it, George, and that’s why your comments are always nice to read here. I’m more upset with the way it’s handled by the experts and writers who are supposed to be unbiased. I will never march over to Blueshirt Banter and be angry that the fans are rooting for their team and being biased. That’s the way it is.
by SatanicStickholders on Feb 1, 2012 9:52 AM EST up reply actions
We've seen more than our fair share of bad bounces this year
I.e. that bounce in the Buffalo game that we completely dominated. You make your own luck, and if you dont capitalize on it, then too bad. Look at the Giants, they capitalized on two misakes, one of which was lucky but here they are.
It’s overcoming and fighting back that won the devils the game, if others want to see it a different way, so be it. They sat out Hank, we were missing Tallinder, Zajac and Henrique…excuses were available aplenty for whatever fan base lost this game.
by SantonioBurress on Feb 1, 2012 10:02 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Excuses are always aplenty for the New York godawful Rags. The fact that were seeing such a dramatic increase in noise level and banter from Ranger fans after just half of a good season should show you how miserably pathetic that franchise has been for nearly two decades. Frankly, I still can’t believe Torts hasn’t come out and blamed the loss on their preseason trip to Europe.
Deadspin
The NJ Devils -- Jersey's Team
by NJallDay on Feb 1, 2012 10:23 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Fluky bounces and goals happen in nearly every game and every team benefits and/or suffers from them so I’m not sure why that one bounce is such a point of focus… except that in the eyes of the authors who do so the game didn’t meet their expectations that the Rangers would beat the Devils and so a scapegoat was needed.
It was an important turning point of the game, no doubt, but even with the fortuitous bounce Biron didn’t appear to be caught flat-footed and had a legitimate chance to stop the shot (as an aside: is Biron normally susceptible to 5-hole shots? I’ve never noticed it as a particular weakness of his before, but between Clarkson’s goal and Kovalchuk’s SO tally he seemed especially vulnerable to them). Then, as you point out, there was OT and a SO with which to still decide the game.
It seemed like it was a pretty evenly played game with both teams having their peaks and valleys, but neither team really taking the game over, so it probably shouldn’t be surprising that a bit of luck helped shape the game’s final outcome. I think the frustration from Devils fans that people point to that single play as game-deciding is that it implies that the Rangers were dominating the game and only ended up not getting two points due to random chance.
Side tangent, in a way, I’m kinda sick of these 1-goal NJD-NYR games. Every one seems to turn into a mini-drama.
That’s rivalry hockey for you. I didn’t even get a chance to watch the game but was kept updated through text messages, and could still feel the same tension and agitation I knew every one watching was.
Fluky bounces and goals happen in nearly every game and every team benefits and/or suffers from them so I’m not sure why that one bounce is such a point of focus
Timing. Rarely do flukes like that happen with ~45 seconds left in a 1-goal game. If you had one of those win probability graphs that baseball has, the biggest change would definitely be at that moment. It’s not necessarily that the Devils were lucky to beat overall, it was that they got a huge break in a situation where their chances of getting 1 point, let alone 2, was very low.
Agree that the game was fairly even. Ultimately, it probably deserved to go to a shootout, but it took a bizarro path to get there.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 1, 2012 10:21 AM EST up reply actions
Fair point.
Still not a fan of the portrayal, however. Perhaps I’m being unfairly indignant, but harping on that one bounce paints a picture to an outside observer that the game was won on and because of that one break.
It’s a fair criticism I suppose. It opened the door for the win, it did not account for the win. That headline and ours would make alot more sense if it was a tie game at that point.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 1, 2012 10:53 AM EST up reply actions
Oh, and I haven’t noticed Biron overly exposable to the 5-hole, I think he just had a bad game. Kovalchuk is just ridiculous, I think he beats every goalie in the league w/ his shootout attempt there, including Henrik.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 1, 2012 10:23 AM EST up reply actions
That’s kind of what I thought. The Devils have seen quite a bit of Biron in the recent past when he played with both the Flyers and Islanders and have had some good success against him, but I don’t recall his ever being obviously weak against shots in one particular area.
Was just wondering if it was a newer development, a trick of perception due to a bad game or perhaps some underlying confidence issue that led him to second guess himself and hesitate.
The Parise goal is actually one that seemed more indicative of a weakness I’ve noticed in Biron. He’s had moments where he’s very lax about covering up that short side. Almost like he doesn’t expect people to take shots from that angle, or to try to beat him there.
No doubt it’s an incredible shot from Parise, but I thought Biron was extremely slow reacting to that rebound.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 1, 2012 10:56 AM EST up reply actions
Better to be lucky than good sometimes, yes. But you make your own luck. Clarkson was where he was supposed to be, as was the Sabres player. I feel like Biron had more of a chance than Marty because of the angle the puck took off the stantion, but that’s just my opinion.
by rtrstevec on Feb 1, 2012 9:58 AM EST via mobile reply actions
The Rangers are a well coached team with good talent and great goaltending. Kind of like the Devils were when they were winning the Cups. I hate them too, but that’s the way it is.
Careful
I dont see two HOF defenseman on that team.
by SantonioBurress on Feb 1, 2012 10:28 AM EST up reply actions
No, but they have one defenseman I would take in an instant.
by Marty 4 Prez on Feb 1, 2012 11:17 AM EST up reply actions
Which one?
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 1, 2012 11:21 AM EST up reply actions
Interesting. He’d be 3rd on my list, behind McDonagh and Staal. Maybe 2nd for now until I see whether Staal can fully bounce back from the concussion, he’s looked bad thus far.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 1, 2012 2:16 PM EST up reply actions
Is McDonagh really that good? Because I think Del Zotto, Stall, and Girardi are all upgrades over what we have now when healthy, if McDonah is too, you guys are really set on D
And Kovalchuk speeds away, great moves, busting through, DID YOU SEE THAT?
In a couple years, I think McDonagh will clearly be their best d-man. There’s already some evidence that he might be now.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 1, 2012 6:44 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, I’ve never been too high on Girardi – he’s very good, but he and Staal got beat last year. I still think the Rangers’ biggest problem are the toughs (as opposed to a team like NJ, who’s been bleeding horribly against bottom lines all year).
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
No argument.
That’s why I think McDonagh surpasses them. He’s not the fastest (because we have Hagelin and Gaborik), but he’s a tremendous skater and make up for a lot of mistakes with it. Once he fixes the mistakes, he’ll be fantastic.
Girardi’s the one that’s overrated though. I think Staal can handle the toughs fine. When he’s away from Girardi, he’s been better, IIRC.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 2, 2012 8:57 AM EST up reply actions
Yes, Clarkson got a lucky bounce that led to his GTG late in the third period. He hardly played like a chump, however, no matter what some may think of him on this site. While his Corsi/Fenwick was somewhat lackluster, he did draw two penalties in addition to his goal…. and I suppose that has to count for something even if the Devils’ PP can be cover-your-eyes awful.
Clarkson’s playing much better than I ever remember him being. He’s obviously shooting the lights out right now, but what changed about his game that he’s been that much better this season? Is it just that he’s 27 and having a solid year during his prime?
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 1, 2012 10:43 AM EST up reply actions
On the puck control
He’s usually looks like hes on waterski’s out there. He has had a much better posession game, which in turn enhances his cycling ability. Sprinkle in some breakaways and some nice shots, and you have a career year. I think he has earned every bit of this career year though, he’s working hard every game and falling down at a lesser clip…..
by SantonioBurress on Feb 1, 2012 10:47 AM EST up reply actions
He’s also got a couple tap-in from behind the goalie, in front of the line goals by being on the doorstep at just the right time to pad his numbers, but the Devs will take goals however they happen.
He is certainly working harder and staying upright more, which has to help. Maybe it comes from having a coach that actually believes in you and gives you the opportunity to succeed.
I’m not going to lie to you. It felt good and I’m going to do whatever is in my power possible to stay there as long as I can. - Petr Sykora on playing on a line with Elias and Parise.
Without looking I’d expect the average distance on Callahan’s goals this year to be about 2.5ft (or 22 feet if you only use the MSG scorer’s distance estimates). There’s nothing wrong with getting the dirty goals, someone has to if you’re going to find long-term success.
He just always struck me as a 3rd liner that was being overrated, as a ~12-15 goal guy that people always thought could do more. Very surprising to see him on a 30 goal pace, but he just looks more committed. Could be coaching.
I don’t have a chance to look, but is it a contract year?
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 1, 2012 10:59 AM EST up reply actions
Well then, good on him. Thanks for the info guys.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 1, 2012 11:08 AM EST up reply actions
I only mentioned coaching because PDB loved him in Juniors and was Chairman of the Clarkson Fanclub since he unpacked his bags in NJ. Clarkie is riding some serious confidence, internal and that of his coach. Couple that with some serious off-season work on being able to skate, and he goes from the overrated third liner he was, to a third line threat that can sub into the top 6. Come to think of it, maybe the coaching staffs reasons for forcing Boulton/Janssen into ice time is to get Clarkie away from a fighting responsibility. That could also have something to do with scoring more.
He’s a nice guy, gives a great interview, and really does have a good time on the ice. We beat the crap out of his last year and over the summer, some people were begging for him to be traded for magic beans and cap space. Now he goes and learns how to skate, gets a hug from the coach and starts tearing it up. Fine by me, right?
I’m not going to lie to you. It felt good and I’m going to do whatever is in my power possible to stay there as long as I can. - Petr Sykora on playing on a line with Elias and Parise.
And my wife. She’d have been absolutely heartbroken if her “boyfriend” had gotten traded.
Sometimes I think he’s the only reason I can get her to sit through games with me.
I suggest you choose your favorite Devils dancer and make that one your “girlfriend.” It doesn’t matter if they’re 10-15 years younger than you. It’s only fair that you should get to openly ogle them. Better check with the wifey first though. For some reason fairness butts heads with double-standards.
by Alan Wright on Feb 1, 2012 6:50 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
If we’re adopting Dancers, I’d like to start the line for Ashley.
I’m not going to lie to you. It felt good and I’m going to do whatever is in my power possible to stay there as long as I can. - Petr Sykora on playing on a line with Elias and Parise.
I have to agree about keeping Boulton or Janssen to get him away from the figthing role, and I do think its helped IMO.
That said, why oh why cant it just be one or the other???
by Chris Calabrese on Feb 1, 2012 6:37 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, he’s riding an above average shooting percentage, but it’s probably a combination of effects (including the S%) that’s led to his improved play.
He’s been healthy (injuries in 09-10 curtailed a promising season that seemed a natural progression from his previous year’s strong performance, and last year was… forgettable for everyone). He’s improved his shot selection (far less “Clark-arounds” and more focus on getting open in the slot). He’s leaving the fighting to others more often, allowing him to spend less time in the penalty box and more time on the ice actually being productive. He himself credits shortening his stick on the advise of someone who’s name escapes me at the moment (and that may be as much placebo effect as actually truthful). I personally suspect that he’s benefiting from being properly placed on the third line and not being bounced around the top two lines in an attempt to get him going.
it was Oates.
I’m not going to lie to you. It felt good and I’m going to do whatever is in my power possible to stay there as long as I can. - Petr Sykora on playing on a line with Elias and Parise.
Well at least he’s done something right behind the bench.
by Marty 4 Prez on Feb 1, 2012 11:21 AM EST up reply actions
I was looking at the Devils point leaders last night and was surprised to see the top two lines, then Clarkson at 24 points, then the rest of the forwards in the single digits (Palmieri and Tedenby are still 7th and 8th, amazingly enough). That admittedly superficial analysis really makes it look like Clarkson has been carrying that third line all by himself, not even getting helpers from his linemates. Granted he has 9 PP points and some time with the 2nd line, but its still surprising to see the lack of production among those bottom six when they have a 17-goal scorer among them.
highlights and hits
Why don’t the highlights show any hits? There were some MASSIVE hits last night, even Kovy got a big one. Would love to see them.
@kenken
I completly agree with you! After Clarkson got hit by Krupp the game started to get more physical and Kovy responded with some huge hits especially the one on Richards.
Too bad they don’t show them!!
NHL.com game highlights has them
by Alan Wright on Feb 1, 2012 6:55 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
If you go to the NHL highlights page for that game specifically, you can view the hits. They’re on the right with a blue dot
by Alan Wright on Feb 1, 2012 6:52 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
the 2nd devils goal is another example of the ridiculous chemistry between Kovy and Elias. There’s no dout about it when you see goals like this, they’re awesome together. Kovy was on fire from the 3rd period to the end of the game, i think he’s not far from averaging 1 goal/game vs this specific hated rival… Good to have him here
"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"
by Elektrostal_Kid on Feb 1, 2012 2:33 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Kovy was on fire from the start to the end of the game
FYP.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 1, 2012 3:09 PM EST up reply actions
He fixed the post (FTP) to note that Kovy was hot throughout.
by Alan Wright on Feb 1, 2012 6:57 PM EST via mobile up reply actions

by 

























