Streak Snapped: New Jersey Devils Hung with St. Louis Blues Lost by a Shootout, 4-3
Most good things must come to some end and tonight it was the end of a five game winning streak. The New Jersey Devils suffered their first non-win of the month in a 4-3 shootout loss to the St. Louis Blues. All things considered, I can't say I'm upset or really disappointed in how the Devils played or even the final result.
Sure, the Devils were in a position to win and didn't get it. I'm not saying fans shouldn't care about that or that I don't care about that. Rather, the Devils played a really, really, really good Blues team in a fairly even game and took them all the way to a shootout. Outside of the shootout itself, the Devils didn't fall flat on their face or lose their focus entirely when St. Louis scored or had a good shift. The Devils had several opportunities of their own to attack and succeeded with three goals and sending their starting goaltender, Jaroslav Halak, to the bench. It would have been great if they got a fourth goal on the several chances they had to get one; but Brian Elliott played excellent in relief and other chances just didn't get finished for one reason or another. It happens.
Sure, the Devils had a lead in the third period and it got lost in that final third of the game. It's not like the Devils really blew it, though. The goal itself was a floating shot from Roman Polak that Patrik Berglund deflected into the net through traffic and Johan Hedberg. As far as equalizing goals go, that's just a bad break for New Jersey. There was some concern about the height of Berglund's stick, but a video review showed that it wasn't clearly over the crossbar. The goal stood and it became 3-3 until the end of regulation and, eventually, overtime. The Devils didn't sit on the 3-2 lead, they out-shot the Blues 9-6 in the third and that's including a 5 minute penalty kill when Kurtis Foster got a major and a game misconduct for boarding. The Devils played a relatively good third period; an unfortunate deflection just beat them. It happens. All it meant that the Devils went from two points to one point.
Frankly, if the Devils had to end their winning streak, then the one opponent who's in the opposite conference and is actually one of the best teams in the league is a good place as any to see it end. Still, the Devils got a point out of the game and they're still in fifth in the Eastern Conference for now. From a results perspective, it's not bad. From a performance perspective, I don't have too many complaints about how the Devils did against the Blues. The team ended at -1 Corsi and +1 Fenwick in even strength; which reflects how the game really went. The shootout was the only real disappointment from the home team, but I suppose the Devils weren't going to stay elite as the Blues weren't going to stay terrible at it. It happens. Should the Devils pick up some more wins soon, then it's no big deal.
I have more thoughts on tonight's game after the jump. For the opposition's point of view, Brad Lee has this recap at St. Louis Game Time.
The Stats: The NHL.com Game Summary | The NHL.com Event Summary | The NHL.com Play by Play Log | The NHL.com Shot Summary | The Time on Ice Shift Charts | The Time on Ice Head to Head Ice Time Charts | The Time on Ice Corsi Charts
The Highlight Video: This game had it all when it came to goals, saves, and even a hit or two. NHL.com has this highlight video of the game that's worth checking out:
The Shootout Flop: I want to start with the one real disappointment from the team tonight: the shootout. When the shootout was the low point of the game, then it really wasn't a bad game. I felt the Devils could have done much better in this portion of the game.
The shooting left a lot to be desired. Ilya Kovalchuk had Brian Elliott moving but he got the puck poke-checked away. I think Kovalchuk made one too many moves in getting in close. Patrik Elias came in wide and actually did get a shot off at Elliott's not-open five-hole. Zach Parise just lost the puck. He came in on Elliott's left and just, well, lost it. It was pretty heinous and I don't think he would have beaten the goaltender even if he had shot it.
Johan Hedberg was better, but he didn't look good on the only goal scored in the shootout. Hedberg got a piece of the shot by T.J. Oshie. Instead of getting most or all of it, it bounced down and slid through his legs for a goal. It wasn't good positioning. Hedberg did much better on following Jamie Langenbrunner and getting a pad stop on him. Alas, the shooters couldn't help him out to keep the shoot out alive.
Perhaps I'm being too picky in the shootout. I mean, the Devils just lost one point out of it and it's to a team they aren't directly competing with in the standings. I don't know, I just thought it was the weakest part of their performance tonight.
Bombing Away: Both teams didn't exactly light up the shot count as the Devils led the Blues only 27-26 in shots on net. What was interesting was that both teams really relied on a few players to get rubber on net. The Blues were led by their top line of David Backes (6 SOG), T.J. Oshie (4 SOG), and David Perron (2 SOG). Seriously, Backes and Oshie are great players and Perron meshes well with the two of them. They got some extra support from Patrik Berglund (3 SOG) and Chris Stewart (3 SOG); but that top line really got things moving. The pairing of Anton Volchenkov and Bryce Salvador saw them quite a lot at even strength and so they were forced to defend quite a bit. That's why they were so low in Corsi: -6 for Volchenkov and -8 for Salvador.
As for the Devils, their offense was led by their top line as well. Ilya Kovalchuk was playing out of his mind with 4 shots on net out of 12 attempts. He was just getting by Blues skaters and getting into space to make tonight feel like a long night for Halak and Elliott. Moreover, the prolific Kovalchuk didn't take chances away from Zach Parise (5 SOG) or Patrik Elias (3 SOG). That line was just cooking and it forced Ken Hitchcock to mix up his match-up defensively; they saw an even mix of Alex Pietrangelo, Barrett Jackman, and Carlo Colaiacovo. Joining that line in terms of the shot parade were David Clarkson (5 SOG) and Adam Henrique (5 SOG), who each got plenty of looks on separate lines. Like the Blues, after this group of 5, the shots were just scattered among other players.
Poor Ilya: Just to reiterate, Ilya Kovalchuk was on fire tonight. He had 12 attempts on net but unfortunately, he just didn't have good luck with most of them. Two were blocked and he missed the net six times. He agonizingly missed the upper part of the net in the second period due to a bouncing puck. He strangely took a turnover from Alex Pietrangelo and attempted a slapshot that went wide. He attempted to pick corners but just pulled his shots a bit too much. I feel bad for Kovalchuk because there were shifts where he'd stay on and still make Blues look second-rate with his moves. He did everything right but the shot just wasn't there.
When I mean everything, that does include his passing. Kovalchuk created two goals tonight. He made the killer cross-ice pass on the Devils' first power play that Zach Parise buried at an angle. He hooked up with Elias on a give and go that Elias finished with aplomb, put the Devils up 3-2, and sent Halak to the bench to be replaced by Elliott. Kovalchuk played an incredible 29:07, 24:02 at even strength, and came out ahead in Corsi at +3. He was excellent - except for the goal. Poor Ilya. He'll get it (and maybe more) next time. As far as the misses, I wouldn't worry too much. A bunch of rolling pucks exacerbated that. Besides, he is fifth in the NHL in shots on net with 195, I think he'll be fine.
Keep the Fire Burning: Elias and Parise extended their point streaks to seven games with a goal from each of them tonight. They don't get anything extra for the goals being pretty sweet; but they were pretty sweet goals.
The Number 14 Looks Fairly Suave: Adam Henrique really had a strong game tonight on offense. He put up 5 shots on net and scored a very sweet goal to tie up the game not long after Perron's goal. The shot came from the right circle and either it hit something along the way or it was perfectly placed to go far post past Halak. Of his four other shots on net, I was most impressed with Henrique's one in overtime. With just under a minute left, he very nearly finished the game in overtime when he broke through a defender and forced Elliott to make a tough stop. Henrique saw the Backes line most often and he came out ahead with a +4 in Corsi; so he definitely wasn't causing any issues in his own end of the rink. Tonight, Henrique looked his best since his injury and I hope it's a sign of things to come.
Your "Huh" Stat of the Night: The Devils' leader in Corsi tonight was Matt Taormina at +8. How, you ask? Easy: he was protected very well by Peter DeBoer. When he was on the ice at even strength, he usually was behind the Elias line with Mark Fayne. Taormina started the night off with Kurtis Foster but DeBoer split that up to pair the weakest defenders with two not-so-weak defenders (Fayne-Taormina, Andy Greene-Foster). In terms of opposition, he didn't face one single line so much more often than anyone else. The most common opponent were Evgeny Grachev, who did nothing; Patrick Berglund, who was somewhat dangerous; and Jamie Langenbrunner, who did nothing tonight either. So Taormina was behind the Devils' most productive line and got some weak competition tonight. He succeeded, which means it worked.
C'mon Son - Foster Edition: Kurtis Foster would probably like a do-over for tonight's game. Foster looked silly as he (and Taormina) couldn't clear a puck in the slot and got beaten by Chris Stewart, who put it past the Moose. Foster was drowning early on due to his own errors and lack of speed. He needed to be rescued by a veteran, which DeBoer obliged by putting him with Andy Greene from the second period onward. It worked out well as Foster stopped acting as a pylon and got up to +3 in Corsi. In the third period, disaster struck. Foster hit Chris Porter from behind into the boards and not only got a major penalty but a game misconduct for the hit. I was at the other end of the rink, so I couldn't tell you whether it was a fair call and I couldn't argue against the penalty either. It definitely could have been costly. Not that Foster was playing really well, but it put the Devils down to five defenders and in a precarious situation with a long power play.
Foster could have had a better night. At least he got the secondary assist on Parise's goal. That's one positive at least.
No Positives for the Fourth: Cam Janssen played 4:08 and was a -4 in Corsi. Eric Boulton played 6:01 and was a -4 in Corsi. Jacob Josefson played 6:08 and was a -5 in Corsi. None of them had a shot on net. None of them were on the ice for a shot on net at even strength. Josefson was the only one of the three to attempt a shot and he missed the net. The fourth line continues to be a vacuum. Now that the third line has been productive and Alexei Ponikarovsky and Steve Bernier continue to do well on the boards, I hope the Devils turn their attention to this waste of a forward line. They don't have to be great, but they shouldn't be useless either.
Super Power Kill: The Blues have had an ineffective power play all season long and the Devils really made it look bad tonight. St. Louis got one power play - the major on Foster - and they only generated 3 shots on net in 3:55. The Devils penalty killers held them to the perimeter, won races for loose pucks, and got in the way of shots from distance. What's more is that the PK got three shots of their own. That's right, the Devils were killing a major penalty and they got two rushes on net and another shot from an angle. Lastly, their pressure led to a St. Louis penalty, Perron tripped Parise, which wiped out the final 1:05. It was a great performance in a tough position. Good job to David Barr and the PK units.
Loose Moose: I had a feeling this wasn't going to be Hedberg's best night when I saw him struggle a bit with his positioning. He didn't get set too often and he looked a bit too jumpy, as if he was fighting the shot somewhat. Outside of the crease, Hedberg remained as inconsistent as ever but thankfully didn't give the puck away too much. In the crease, I felt he could have done better on Stewart's shot even though Foster and/or Taormina should have cleaned up the mess in the first place. He looked pretty bad on Perron's goal in the second period. I know he got a piece of it with his blocker, but if he could have gotten some of it, then he should have gotten more. Some of his saves were just moves seemingly out of desperation when St. Louis stormed the net. I'm glad he made them; but on another night, maybe he doesn't get it or inadvertently puts the puck in a worse spot. The third goal against definitely was not his fault as it was a deflection; but I felt Hedberg was a bit too loose and could have done better.
The Deflection: Was Berglund's stick above the crossbar? I don't know for sure. I wasn't sure seeing it live, albeit from a distance. The video replay at the Rock really wasn't all that clear. I can see DeBoer's argument, as given in this post game post by Tom Gulitti, but I don't think it's anything to get too worked up over. If the video was inconclusive, then it's not possible to overturn it. The Devils could have scored a fourth goal before or after that event, so it's not like the Devils lost the game because of the call. As I said prior to the jump, it happens.
Brisk: Early on, the game seemed choppy. Not in an ugly way, but in that both teams skated hard and put in an effort with very little result. The game was fairly brisk. The Blues are a fast team and they do have some good size. It's good to see that the Devils hung with them, repelling much of what the Blues tried to set up. As it turned out, the game became a defensive affair with each team held to under 30 shots on net and defending players coming up big to prevent a juicy rebound or a killer pass from becoming a killer shot. The game's pace was brisk, the action was even (again: Devils were -1 in Corsi, +1 in Fenwick by the end of regulation), and the match-up was entertaining. The Devils hung with a top possession team and got something out of it. That's good. The power play wasn't too bad and converted, the PK came up big in a major penalty situation, and the top forwards.
On Backes: David Backes is a really good player. I cannot say enough how impressed I was with how he did. Elliott played great in relief; and Oshie was quite good too. I wasn't too impressed from their top defenseman Pietrangelo. But Backes was big, he played big, he played physical, he played fast, he was winning quite a few faceoffs (13-for-20), he owned in possession (+8 Corsi), and he created many shooting opportunities for himself and his linemates. I felt like he could do it all. I'm admittedly not familiar with the Blues to know whether this was just one great game; but I suspect he does this regularly. I, for one, was impressed all the same.
One Final Thought: While the Devils did allow an equalizer, they played a fairly good third period. They matched the Blues power play shot for shot during Foster's major; they drew two power plays and got two shots on net (should have been three, but the scorer didn't count Parise's jam attempt on the third PP); they out-shot the Blues 9-6; and they didn't end up too deep in negative Corsi. That's the sort of performance I want to see more often from the Devils when they have lead. I wanted the Devils to not sell out the offense in the third and I got that. In the future, it'll yield more positive results - especially if they make a habit of this.
That's my take on tonight's shootout loss. What was yours? How did you react with the shootout loss? Would you say the Devils deserved to get at least a point out of this game? Do you now have a better opinion of the Devils' quality given how they played against a strong St. Louis team? Who on the Devils impressed you the most? Who on the Devils disappointed you the most? What do you think the Devils need to do to bounce back against Florida on Saturday? Please leave your answers and other thoughts about tonight's shootout loss in the comments. Thanks to everyone in the Gamethread and those who followed @InLouWeTrust at points during the game; and thank you for reading.
41 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It was a pretty good game that could have went either way, I think we probably deserved a better fate, but stuff like that happens. Regarding the shootout, I think after having such good fortunes with it the rest of the year, you can’t really blame what happened. It just stinks that Parise couldn’t even get a shot off.
Oh, and you are definitely right, Kovalchuk was on absolute fire tonight, but for some reason his shot was off.
And Kovalchuk speeds away, great moves, busting through, DID YOU SEE THAT?
Kovalchuk’s shot was off line because for the first time in over a year he was sharing the same ice with Jamie Langenbrunner. Must’ve felt like old times.
Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines
Technically, we’re two weeks short of that “one year anniversary”. The Devils played in Dallas on February 22nd of last year, and Langenbrunner was part of that game.
Moose's play bothered me tonight
Like you said he was out of position often, and looked downright squirmy. He left a few rebounds in the slot that could’ve turned something out of nothing. Other than that, I thought it was a really good game against a good team. To me this was just more proof we can hang with the elites. I would feel very confident if we got Philly in the first round. Also, maybe someone caught it, but did I see Terreri with the pads on at the end of the bench? I was at work, half paying attention and I could’ve sworn I saw 31 flash quickly.
Pretty amazing that 3/4 previous teams we have played against have pulled their goaltenders.
Equally amazing is how well we are doing while still missing so many key players. The last time I felt this confident was when we beat San Jose and Boston back-to-back two seasons ago (I think it was two) when they were top teams.
by Torontonian Devil on Feb 10, 2012 1:05 AM EST reply actions
Shame to see our shootout fizzle out so tamely last night. Time for a shootout practice competition in training, I think. (-$250 a miss, $500 a score, to make it interesting!) Not worried about Kovy, because he’s almost always burying them, but Zach and Patty need to practice their moves a bit. I’d quite like to see what one of Henrique or Josefson could do on the top 3 SO guys, for example.
From St. Louis Game Time:
Did the Devils make a huge mistake building their arena in Newark? No wonder they’re going bankrupt, the attendance looks horrible. According to ESPN, the Devils are drawing an average of 15,113 at an 85 percent capacity. I’ll put money on the under if Thursday night is any indication.
I have respect for most sports fans with 2 exceptions: NY Ranger fans who grew up in New Jersey, and Dallas Cowboy fans who can't name the capital of Texas.
Huh, I guess a Western Conference team that’s been awful for years and manages some rare success this year averaging less than 2.5 goals per game isn’t a big draw on a Thursday night. Who’d have thought?
Well part of being successful is knowing how to deal with it and Blues fans just aren’t used to it. Their team made a miracle run to the playoffs a few years ago, other than that they’ve been consistently mediocre since winning the presidents trophy.
by rtrstevec on Feb 10, 2012 11:07 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Devils actually got about that many in the Rock. Crowd looked good from what I saw. For an Western Conference team with no real big name stars on a Thursday, that’s pretty good.
Also, I guess the Devils must have played well to bring up the attendance.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Feb 10, 2012 9:50 AM EST via Android app up reply actions
One thing I noticed was that a lot of the people in the suites don’t actually sit in their seats, but rather stay back in the actual suite schmoozing and networking and enjoying the really good food (seriously, their bread pudding is to die for).
It might not make a huge difference as there were many empty seats in the lower bowl, but it certainly doesn’t help appearances.
You get free food at the Fire or Ice bars, right?
by Marty 4 Prez on Feb 10, 2012 10:03 AM EST up reply actions
They bring it to the room… I don’t know where it comes from. It was all delicious, though. Fried ravioli, mozzarella sticks, pizza, chicken fingers, potato skins, bread pudding…
I’m drooling just thinking about it.
All I know is I got a ticket to section 20 for the Canucks game as part of the Devils Dream Day Camp. I’m hoping that being in that section affords me access to lots of free food. I think it does, but I’m not certain.
I typically sit up in the upper bowl, and I’ve never been on the sides in the lower bowl, so I have never been privy to either of the main concourse lounges and what they have to offer. Unfortunately they weren’t open for typical business three years ago when I saw Metallica at the Rock.
by Marty 4 Prez on Feb 10, 2012 10:24 AM EST up reply actions
My dad got club tickets from his work and he asked me if I wanted to go to the game against the Jets. For some reason being the nice older brother I let my younger bro get first dibs…. I regret that decision. I tagged along because they were already going and got a cheap ticket on a resell site
It’ll pay off one day. That younger brother will… do something worthwhile… one day… maybe.
by Alan Wright on Feb 10, 2012 12:37 PM EST up reply actions
St. Louis
It’s disturbing that they’d say anything about Newark given how different St. Louis is from Newark. But maybe that doesn’t matter to them. Both towns have lots of problems (especially in East St. Louis, Illinois).
Another difference is that St. Louis has only three major sports teams downtown: the Blues, the Rams, and the Cardinals. Yet, in the past 10 years, both the Blues and the Rams have had low attendance numbers. The Rams are performing pretty poorly lately.
As to the Blues, their attendance was in 2005-06 was as low as 74% and 2006-07, the Blues had attendance dip as low as 59%. This was 10-12 years after their new arena was built.
Here are the Blues home averages:
2004-05: lockout.
2005-06: 14,213 people. 74.2%. 5th in Central Division. No playoffs.
2006-07: 12,520 people. 59.6%. 3rd in Central. No playoffs.
2007-08: 17,610 people. 83.9%. 5th in Central. No playoffs.
2008-09: 18,554 people. 88.4%. 3rd in Central. Lost in Conference Qtrfinals to Canucks.
2009-10: 18,883 people. 98.6%. 4th in Central. No playoffs.
2010-11: 19,150 people. 100%. 4th in Central. No playoffs.
2011-12: 18,755 people. 97.9%. Currently 2nd in Central/ 4th in Conference.
Good for them that they’ve both increased attendance in absolute numbers and as a percentage of overall seating. I’d like to see how they did it. Marketing, cross-promotions, hotshot draft picks, decreased prices, etc.
In any case, St. Louis itself is a very different market than northern New Jersey. Greater St. Louis is one of the 15 largest metropolitan areas in the country and, as they’re quick to tell you, it’s a great sports town. The Blues also aren’t competing with 4 other winter sports teams – including two hockey teams, two basketball teams, two fall-winter NFL teams… on top of the baseball teams which dominate the off-season media.
by Alan Wright on Feb 10, 2012 12:05 PM EST up reply actions
Eh, in their pre-game post they didn’t do their homework and mentioned visiting East Rutherford, so it’s hard to take any insults very seriously when it’s obvious they’re just relying on stereotypes and the eternal wisdom of Barry Melrose.
Besides, people in glass houses and all…
It is nice to see they’ve increased their attendance, though. I too would be curious to know how they did it. Seems like a business model the Devils should look in to.
Yeah, probably some stereotypes there. Also, if the observation about the suites/ bar are helpful, then that explains some of the lower bowl seats.
I just read on Wikipedia that the Blues were sold by the Walton-Laurie family (of Wal-Mart fame) in March of 2006 to a private equity firm, TowerBrook Capital Partners.
I’m not ashamed to say I believe in a robust free market, but I’d be concerned if private equity started dipping its toes into “my” professional sports teams.
by Alan Wright on Feb 10, 2012 12:32 PM EST up reply actions
Interesting. Right around the time their attendance took a huge jump forward.
The likely explanation then is that the new owners took a different approach to advertising and sales, but I’m going to imagine that it was really thousands of smart people boycotting Walmart by extension.
I think you’re right that it’s a new marketing/ ad/ sales approach among the other cost-saving measures private equity typical brings to the fold. For all I know, private equity is a successful way to run a sports franchise long-term, or at least turn one around. The Green Bay Packers have chosen another route: a publicly owned not for profit corporation.
Interesting side-note that the Blues’ president is John Davidson, the homery color commentator for the Rangers in the ’90s and early naughts. It must have been a complicated and lucrative time to start there in 2005 when he did.
by Alan Wright on Feb 10, 2012 12:48 PM EST up reply actions
My Bad
in their pre-game post they didn’t do their homework and mentioned visiting East Rutherford
Old habits die hard…. That’s totally on me. I had forgotten that the new digs were also in a new town. Chalk that up to the infrequency of our two teams playing.
Junior Assistant Blogger-In-Training at www.StLouisGameTime.com
by CrossCheckRaise on Feb 11, 2012 4:07 PM EST up reply actions
I thought they should have won this game, but for the play of Hedberg. Two points would have been great, but I can’t complain too much about only getting one.
I still left impressed with the team for out shooting a good possession team in the Blues despite playing most of the game tied or ahead, and having to kill off a 5 minute major. A good sign.
What clinched it was my wife posting a picture from our great seats on facebook with a comment about winning while the Devils were up 3-2. Don’t worry, all of our Devils fan friends let her know she jinxed it.
Look at the bright side, we lose one more in a row and Max16 comes out!!!!
by Zelepukin on Feb 10, 2012 9:28 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
No, he only shows his head when Marty has a poor game.
by Marty 4 Prez on Feb 10, 2012 10:04 AM EST up reply actions
but his argument is so valid bro
by SatanicStickholders on Feb 10, 2012 10:10 AM EST up reply actions
Cute as that may be, let’s be nicer to our fellow users. They’re not Ranger fans.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Feb 10, 2012 10:19 AM EST via Android app up reply actions
You gotta admit though, it’s nice to go on a decent winning streak to help keep the naysayers and Chicken Littles at bay.
by Marty 4 Prez on Feb 10, 2012 10:28 AM EST up reply actions
Would be a tougher loss if it was to a conference opponent
Moose was inconsistent. Which is weird because you think he would have been last game after a really long lay off instead of a game after a little more then a week. But what do I know about being a goaltender. It felt on the major and the 3rd goal that the Devils were getting paid back for their breaks over the last few games (Rags game not withstanding because that was a good no goal call and have no idea why Rags fans think its like the worst call ever but that’s another discussion). Either way Florida is a game they need to show up for since its important to not lose ground to the 9th place team. (which Florida isn’t in because they played one less game but still)
The Devils have been absolutely stellar in shootouts this season
So I can’t be too mad about last nights performance. However, man did they look bad last night.
"I never knew how someone dying could say he was the luckiest man in the world. But now I understand." -Mickey Mantle's farewell address
by LaserVortex888 on Feb 10, 2012 12:52 PM EST reply actions
Haha
I thought the break was a little too short.
"I never knew how someone dying could say he was the luckiest man in the world. But now I understand." -Mickey Mantle's farewell address
by LaserVortex888 on Feb 10, 2012 5:21 PM EST up reply actions

by 


























