Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

New Jersey Devils Winless in Four, Earned a Point in 4-3 OT Loss to Boston Bruins

Pictured: The aftermath of the rare(ly successful) Clarkaround.  Mandatory Credit: Bob DeChiara-US PRESSWIRE

The New Jersey Devils lost to the Northeast Division leading Boston Bruins 4-3 in overtime. In the three previous meetings, the Devils not only lost each game to Boston in regulation but got destroyed in the third period with at least 3 goals allowed in each game: 4-3, 6-1, and 4-1. It is actually an improvement that the Devils only allowed one goal in the third period in this game and at least took it to overtime.

Of course, this is not what you or most Devils fans are thinking. No, it's the Devils' fourth straight game without a win. The Devils not only lost all four games to Boston this season, but they haven't won since last Tuesday in Toronto. They allowed an opposing player, David Krejci, to score a hat trick - the second time that has happened in the last three games. On top of that, the Devils went into the third period up 3-2 and blew the lead. Then they lost it in OT. The team's spinning out of control and who knows what this team is all about. That's all true. I understand the frustration. It's difficult to believe there are positives out of this game. But there were positives in the Devils performance.

One, the Devils weren't dominated in the third period. They out-shot the Bruins 8-4. The action went up and down through the third and the Devils more than held their own. I really can't get worked up about the game tying goal. The equalizer, David Krejci's second goal of the night, came on a weird play that saw a puck fly into the air, get gloved down by Zdeno Chara in the slot, briefly touch the puck with his stick whereupon Milan Lucic floats it to Krejci on Martin Brodeur's right flank, who then has to have the puck go off his thigh and whack at it in mid-air and just get enough of it to knock it in off a diving Brodeur. If you followed that description, then you know by the end of it that a lot had to go right for there to be a shot at all. It was a fluke play and the Devils responded fairly well to it.

Two, the Devils made a stunning comeback after a bad first period. Don't get mad about Boston getting one in the third period, get mad at how the Devils played lackadaisical defense for the first period that allowed the Bruins to go up 2-0 to make it a difficult game. Krejci was trailing on a rush, Petr Sykora was late on him, and he fired a great shot to score. Later, Tyler Seguin was trailing on a rush, Adam Henrique and Zach Parise didn't pay attention, and so Seguin had tons of space and time to fire a low shot that got in - possibly on a deflection. The Bruins could have scored many more goals if it wasn't for Martin Brodeur playing out of his mind. Brodeur kept the Devils in the game when they were getting torched by Boston rushes. The only other positive out of that first period was that the Devils killed a penalty.

Yet, the Devils responded almost perfectly in the second period. They took the first six shots on net. Ilya Kovalchuk took a Boston turnover and fed it beautifully to Zach Parise for a great goal. A great bounce off Dennis Seidenberg's skate gave Patrik Elias a much-needed goal past a surprised Tim Thomas. David Clarkson went in and scored on a wraparound. Yes, there was an actual Clarkaround goal and it was glorious. While the Devils allowed as many shots as they took by the period's end along with a shorthanded chance Brodeur made a great stop on; the defense was sharper. Incoming Bruins were picked up. Clearances were better. Brodeur didn't have to miracle a save every time a Boston player looked to shoot. It was a great period and it's further evidence that this team's more resilient than you may think.

Three, the Devils got a point. The Bruins have made the Devils eat their lunch, especially in the third period, in the other three games against them. After losing three straight games and especially after a bad first period down two scores, getting something out of the game would have been fantastic. The Devils at least did that. Sure, I would have loved it if they held onto the win in the third, got a fourth goal against Thomas, or dragged the game to a shootout and won there. A win is always best. Given the larger circumstances, I'm not really upset with the result. Yeah, I know the Devils lost a third period lead, went 0-3-1 against Boston, and are now winless in four; but that's how I see it. I'm not upset.

As usual, I have more thoughts on tonight's overtime loss after the jump. Please check out Ryan Durling's recap of the game at Stanley Cup of Chowder for a Bruins' perspective. Apparently, Boston hasn't swept the Devils in a season series in 26 years. Huh. I did not know that.

Star-divide

The Stats: The NHL.com Game Summary | The NHL.com Event Summary | The NHL.com Play by Play Log | The NHL.com Shot Summary | The Time on Ice Shift Charts | The Time on Ice Head to Head Ice Time Charts | The Time on Ice Corsi Charts

The Game Highlights: Video evidence that David Clarkson scored on a wraparound and more in these highlights from NHL.com. Late edit: Now, I see it's up. Sorry about that. Here's the video.

Just Barely: Just to reiterate, when Chara gloved down that puck in the air, he did put it down and touch it with his stick. Lucic then immediately knocked it in Krejci's direction, who then swung at the puck and knocked it in. In the run of play, I can see how some may think the play should have been blown dead for a hand pass. However, the MSG+ broadcast had a great replay of it that confirmed that Chara just touched the puck after he put it down. That makes it a legal play. It sucks, but better that than a defensive breakdown, right? (Don't ask Adam Henrique about that.)

The Strange Corsi: This was a weird game in terms of Corsi. The Devils enjoyed the better of attempts but only by +3. The third period featured plenty from Boston but a lot of them just missed the net or were blocked by the Devils. Yet, that the Devils still held positive further indicates that they didn't sit back and let the game come to them.

Anyway, there were quite a few oddities. Take the Henrique line and their defensive match-up. They saw plenty of Chara and Andrew Ference on defense. Against them, Parise was a +4, Henrique was +6, and Kovalchuk was somehow a -7. I guess Kovalchuk hung on for a bunch of shifts where the Devils got pinned back? Perhaps getting double-shifted on the fourth line hurt him some too? But here's the weird thing. Chara finished the game at +2 and Ference was a -13! I'm not even sure how that would happen. I suppose that explains why we some shifts of Chara with the likes of Adam McQuaid at times. It also explains why Claude Julien really wanted Chara matched with Kovalchuk more than anyone else.

Here's another: Petr Sykora skated mostly against Dennis Seidenberg, McQuaid, and Boston's top line of Seguin, Krejci, and Lucic. Sykora ended the night at a mind boggling +10. The Elias line had a good game in possession and it was one of the few Devils units that was uniformly positive with Dainius Zubrus and Elias putting up +6 and +5 respectively. All three of them had 5 attempts on net. It's just amazing considering they went up against the line that scored all of the goals for Boston tonight in regulation.

It wasn't all strange, though. Eric Boulton went -7 in 4:38 of ice time. News flash: Boulton's a waste of a roster spot.

Good Goaltending: In a game where 7 goals were allowed between both goaltenders, I felt Tim Thomas and Martin Brodeur did quite well. Brodeur was the key reason why Boston wasn't winning 5-0 after the first period alone and he made huge stops later in the game be it on a shorthanded breakaway or a loose puck in front. Thomas worked just as hard. He had to make some very tough stops from close range several times on the Devils. In fact, he had to make a pretty good save prior to the offensive rushes Boston scored on in the first period. The only goal either goaltender really wishes he would have had back was Thomas allowing Clarkson to beat him on the right post on the wraparound. That was a soft one. Even so, both netminders did their job to keep their team in it and usually that's all you can reasonably ask for. I thought both played good.

A Fourth Positive: Given how irate I was about the attack against the Rangers on Monday night, let me say it in bold letters: the Devils offense existed tonight - and they were pretty good. Elias had four shots on net and scored his first goal since February 9 against St. Louis. Yes, he was in the right place at the right time; but he needed that goal - just as the Devils needed at the time. Ilya Kovalchuk got more of his attempts on net; four out of his eight were on net, three were blocked. That's an improvement. Zach Parise finished off a lovely 2-on-1, one of his three shots on net out of five attempts. Battling against Chara, it wasn't easy, but Parise played a tough game out there. The D provided some help as Mark Fayne got four on net out of seven attempts. Andy Greene got three on net out of four attempts. That's a big improvement over Monday's game.

Overall, the Devils had 31 shots on Tim Thomas out of 53 attempts. After the horrid 13-shot performance against the Rangers, I was really glad to see the Devils attack as they did. They made Thomas sweat, they made the Bruins defense react, they drew two penalties on offense (and on Chara), and they scored three goals on a top goaltender in the NHL. That's a big improvement from the dreck that the Devils put out there on this past Monday.

Some PP Help Would Have Been Nice: In retrospect, the Devils really could have had more help from their power play. The Devils got three power plays and converted on none of them. They got four shots on net, but they allowed three shorthanded chances to Boston - two got on net, and one hit the post. While the Devils were able to set up on the power play a few times, I felt they just misfired on their final passes and/or settled for some poor shots that either got blocked or missed entirely. As much as I liked the Devils attacking against Boston at evens, the 5-on-4 play left a lot to be desired in my opinion. Especially on the latter two since Boston's stud defender was sitting in the box for both. That said, the PP not doing so well really shouldn't surprise Devils fans at this juncture. At least the PK was successful. (Also not a surprise to Devils fans.)

The OT Winner: David Krejci scored his third goal of the game and won it in overtime for Boston on a simple rebound. What happened prior is what killed the Devils. First, Krejci lays off the puck in the corner and gets away from Marek Zidlicky. Chara jumps up on the play and goes into the corner and Zubrus follows him. He beats Zubrus to the puck easily since Zubrus loses his stick on the play. The puck goes behind the net where Mark Fayne and Patrice Bergeron battle for it. Chara heads back to the left post and Bergeron feeds him the puck. Brodeur goes low to block Chara's attempt at a jam play. Zidlicky goes after Chara which was ineffective since Chara looks like a dinosaur next to the wee Zidlicky. Brodeur keeps it out but Chara hit the puck so hard, it bounced out a good distance. Krejci swoops in and knows he's got the high part of the net open. Kovalchuk just stretches out his stick in the hopes of stopping it but he's just too late and Krejci's shot was perfect.

Given Krejci's original position after laying it off, he was sort of in a no man's land. Kovalchuk had to hang low on the other side to prevent the right flank; Krejci certainly wasn't his responsibility. Zidlicky had to come back and help on Chara to little avail. Fayne had to challenge Bergeron lest he allow Bergeron to do as he pleased. Ultimately, I keep looking to when Zubrus lost his stick. If he had kept it, then he could have knocked the puck away or trap it along the boards. In response, Zubrus could have stuck with Chara instead of going to get his stick. It was a bang bang play and all the credit goes to Krejci for poaching a game winner. Like Elias' goal, the puck was placed into the perfect space for Krejci to come in and hammer it in. My point is that it wasn't the horrid defensive breakdown it may have looked live.

Krejci Killed: Three goals, four shots on net, and the one he got stopped on was a very surprising right pad stop - Krejci could have easily scored. As the game went on, he faded. He got beaten in possession as evidenced by his -7 Corsi. When he had the puck, though, he was dangerous and he got into spaces where the Devils weren't. He made the most of his opportunities and he fully deserves the accolades that come with a game winning hat trick.

Defensive Praise: Well, after the first period, I liked Andy Greene's game. He was a +8 in Corsi and good things tended to happen when he was on the ice. He had 3 shots on net of his own. Given that he got to see the Seguin line most of all, I find that to be somewhat impressive. While his Corsi wasn't so good at -3, I also liked the heads-up plays Bryce Salvador made in his own end. He cleaned up loose pucks, he put out some good stickchecks, he had a few important interceptions, and he was pretty good along the boards. His assignments weren't so easy either.

Defensive Criticism: The first period. That goes for all of the skaters, not just the defensemen.

On an individual level, I started to notice Adam Larsson struggling a bit tonight. He was a -2 and he played mostly against Boston's depth forwards at evens. He seemed a bit tentative. I don't know if this is just the effect of trying to come back from an injury that kept him out for most of a month, that Larsson is just having some rookie struggles, whether it's just a not-so-good game or something else. I don't think he was a pylon, but he did have shifts where he got pushed around like one.

I also was not really impressed with Marek Zidlicky. That he played 21:52 tonight tells me the coaches think more of him than Kurtis Foster, which I agree with. Yet, no attempts on net despite 3:58 of power play time? A blueline turnover that led to a shorthanded chance? Some careless plays in the Devils' end? It's only three games and I know he's getting acclimated to a new team, but this isn't very good. I just hope he settles in soon so he can contribute at both ends of the rink. Maybe we're a bit spoiled at how quickly Alexei Ponikarovsky (another nice night from him) and Steve Bernier (not terrible) settled in and did some positive things with New Jersey.

One Last Thought: If they get a win tomorrow, the Devils not only snap the streak, they would claim 3 out of 4 points in a back-to-back and things start looking better. I know it's tempting to hit the panic button with 4 winless games in a row to kick off March. It's still way too soon. Also: there's no such thing as a panic button at this point.

Now that you've read my take, I want to know yours. What did you think of the Devils overtime loss to Boston? Are you more unhappy with the winless streak, content that the Devils got something out of Boston this season, or are you feeling something else entirely? What did you think about the Devils offense getting 31 shots and three goals on Tim Thomas? What did you think of the Devils' defense, both during and after the first period? What would you like the Devils to do differently against Washington other than not give up two goals in the first ten minutes? Will the Devils build on this OT loss? Is there anything to build on? Please leave your answers and other thoughts about this game in the comments. Thank you to everyone who read and commented in the gamethread as well as those who followed along on Twitter with @InLouWeTrust. Thank you for reading.

Comment 15 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Note

I’ll add the highlight video once it’s up at NHL.com

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Mar 1, 2012 11:26 PM EST reply actions  

hindsight

i know hindsight is 20/20 but at least two of the goals against us tonight could have been avoided with smiple plays. I think it was the tying goal, where henrique could have made a simple play but instead the puck gets turned over stays in the zone and eventually results into a goal. The highlights aren’t up to verify what i’m talking about, but I don’t get what it is about the Bruins this year they just expose the crap out of our defense more than any other team.

by poros all star on Mar 2, 2012 12:07 AM EST reply actions  

Feeling something else entirely

For a team that 10 days ago was 6th in the league in Points they are so dam inconsistent. Prior to the Allstar break I was thinking PDB was not the right coach for this team.

Started to change my mind when they went on that 8-1-1 run. But now I’m back to thinking he isn’t the right guy.

Now I’m not saying he is a horrible coach. Players like him. So what do I know.
Just something to me just doesn’t seem right.

Maybe its not him. Maybe its the players. They have Average Goaltending and Average at best goal scoring. After all David Clarkson is leading the team in Goals.

Thankfully with the additions of Ponikarovsky, Bernier and the eventual return of Zajac. The teams depth going into the playoffs should be strong. But this good period bad period stuff has got to stop.

by NJDOhio on Mar 2, 2012 12:08 AM EST reply actions  

You can’t coach the puck into the net. Mostly that’s up to the players and the hockey gods.

Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines

by Triumph44 on Mar 2, 2012 12:20 AM EST up reply actions  

I feel as though you have to put things in perspective when speaking about the Devils offense this season. Although we all want to see the team score more, we have to realize that the team was dead last in scoring last year, and making a jump from dead last to middle of the pack in and of itself is a pretty big deal. Could/should they be scoring more? Yes, but first they should start putting 30+ shots on net with regularity.

by dkball7 on Mar 2, 2012 6:49 AM EST up reply actions  

That’s exactly it. The Devils have been a bottom-five team in SF/60 in 5-on-5 play and are in the bottom third in 5-on-4 play. The Devils don’t have a horribly low S% this season so if the team wants more goals, then they got to shoot more. Eventually, they’ll go in.

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Mar 2, 2012 7:33 AM EST via Android app up reply actions  

The biggest concern is losing the third period lead once again. This has plaqued them all season and they need to overcome it. Assuming they make the playoffs, this team is a one and out unless they play 3 periods and learn to protect a lead. If you set the bar low enough, finding positives is easy. The fact that they lost the lead again and lost in overtime tells me the underlying problem has not been solved and that is by far a major negative….that outweighs whatever positives we want to take from the game in my opinion.

by denmay on Mar 2, 2012 10:05 AM EST reply actions  

Need to get in playoff gear quickly!!

Terrible game last nite by Zidlicky!! IHe is not better than Foster on the Powerplay thats for sure…And allots of bad decisions and turnovers.

Josefson had a good game!

With the imminent return of Zajac in about a week or two we need to find other combinations at this point. I really really don’t know why Deboer doesn’t want to try Kovy on the left wing!!

I would try him at least one game on the left of Elias and Sykora.

I would love to see Parise on left, Zajac at center (when he’s back) and Henrique on the right.

It would be harder for the other teams if Parise and Kovy are not playing together.

by kovalchuk007 on Mar 2, 2012 11:45 AM EST reply actions  

Adds depth.

I like that plan. I would also like to see Kovy back on left side, and I like the idea of giving the Parise, Zajac, Henrique line a chance. Separating Kovy and Parise, and making Clarkson the focus of the Third line is probably the best combination and spreads out the talent. I agree that splitting them up would make it harder for other teams and coaches to deal with. Having three solid lines that can produce at the same level is better than having one line that produces everything any day. I just think it would create more depth in the team. Then again there is still locker room politics to deal with, something that I think was less of an issue with some past coaches.

Head shots are for the weak, a real man hits the body.

by Biggs Johnson on Mar 2, 2012 2:11 PM EST up reply actions  

What?

Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The New Jersey Devils SBN Blog

by John Fischer on Mar 2, 2012 4:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m baffled. Well done, sir.

by SatanicStickholders on Mar 2, 2012 5:12 PM EST up reply actions  

BRUINS GAME

Drove up to Boston for the game. Agree with you on what I saw sans TV commentary. Devs could have put B’s down real quick in the first 30 seconds with the play in the crease against Thomas. Dev’s, except Marty didn’t show up for 1st period. He needed a trapeze the way they let him play by himself. Second period they looked like they should have, and out played the Bruins in the 2nd & 3rd. ALL goals were beauties. Called the Clarkaround ! Tying goal was not a breakdown or a “softie”. Marty is showing some vintage work. Larsson doesn’t look well…effects of injury, tired, rookie errors, he’ll be fine, but needs somebody to work with him. One other note about the lack of taking care of “OPPORTUNITIES”…the Dev’s are just missing in the games since the Rangers. ….open nets, but pucks in their skates, not on the stick, two Devs bumping into each other and losing an open net opportunity, NO ONE in position to pick up a rebound like Krejci did, with the exception of Patrik’s goal. Defense needs to tighten up..Zidlicky new…YES, Larsson hurting..YES…missing Tallinder..OBVIOUSLY YES ! Last thought. I’m superstitious ! Before OT started I thought Bruins might win in OT and was praying for a SO ! Reason ? ALL 6 goals during regulation were scored in the same end ! Bad Karma ! Dev’s outplayed Bruins in OT also.

by CHIN MUSIC 2 on Mar 3, 2012 8:38 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the New Jersey Devils! New here? Check out the Rules and Guidelines before posting.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A Paean to Ilya Kovalchuk
The_official_web_site___new_jersey_devils_small
FOR THE LOVE OF THE DEVILS...PLEASE DON'T SELL YOUR TICKETS TO RANGERS FANS

Recent FanPosts

Tdevilsg_small
GAME SIX SIGN IN
A_s_game_small
Game 6 tickets
31519_397927484582_78722009582_3938348_414926_n_small
Goal Bar Seats
Small
Games Played in the Conference Playoffs: A History Lesson
Small
Line Changes...Again
Small
Cup or Bust?
Claude_small
Post your press conference question(s) for John Tortorella here.
Pig_face_small
Mar-ty, Hen-ke
Small
Top Secret Agent or Cranky Middle Aged Man?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

joomla visitors

Managers

Stanley_cup_and_you_-_sbn_small John Fischer

Authors

Puddy_small Tom Stivali

Marty_sbetter_small Matthew Ventolo

Zidlickymania_small Kevin Sellathamby

1729_small Matt Evans SNC