Forwards: Yes, Patrik Elias scored 2 goals, but the line of him, Dainius Zubrus, and Damien Brunner was ineffective as a whole. Elias went 10/15 and generated 4 shot attempts with 3 shots. A decent output. The other 2? Not so much. Zubrus (2/4, no SAG) and Brunner (5/7, no SAG) had very little impact on the game.
Travis Zajac (18/20, 6 SAG, 2 SG) and Jaromir Jagr (10/15, 3 SAG, 2 SG) continued to generate offense despite playing with a 3rd new winger in as many games. Jacob Josefson (9/11, 1 SAG, 1 SG) was better than Joe Whitney, but not great. Granted, it was his first game in over a month, I think, so hopefully he’ll get a few more games to prove himself. Honestly, I’m not sure why they didn’t leave Zubrus up top and just put JJ between Elias and Brunner on the 3rd line, but that’s just me.
The Newfies + Rico were a strange bunch. Adam Henrique had very little impact on the game (6/10, no SAG) but Michael Ryder (7/8, 4 SAG, 2 SG) and Ryane Clowe (18/27, 8 SAG, 3 SG) were quite busy. Clowe’s accuracy was pretty bad, but he generated a ton of offense.
Defensemen: Over 75% of the defensemen’s passes occurred in the defensive zone. When they did go forward, they were able to generate 7 shot attempts and 3 shots, which are about their season averages. Eric Gelinas attempted 20 passes in the defensive zone, more than any other blue liner. He completed 17 of those 20 and went 2/3 in the neutral zone.
Marek Zidlicky was the busiest of the defensemen, going 20/28, generating 2 shot attempts and 1 shot. Bryce Salvador was also quite busy (20/22), but was efficient as both of the shot attempts he generated turned into shots. Andy Greene (15/19) and Mark Fayne (12/14) had similar outings as both were largely ineffective at generating offense—1 SAG apiece.
Anton Volchenkov had little impact, recording 5/6 in the defensive zone and nothing else.
Passing Data Explained:
Pass: A reasonable and deliberate attempt to get the puck to a teammate which results in 1 of 3 outcomes: 1) Maintaining possession; 2) Allows for the recipient of the pass to make a “hockey move” (dump in, deflection, another pass etc.); 3) A shot attempt. When in doubt, common sense will prevail.
What you see above is a chart illustrating pass completions, pass attempts, and pass percentages for each player in all three zones. A pass that goes across a zone or two will be marked as occurring in the zone it originates from.
Each completed pass that results in a shot taken by a teammate counts as one “shot attempt generated” or “SAG” in the chart below. This is tracked to attempt to determine which teammates are better at generating opportunities to shoot. You’ll also see a “shot generated” or “SG” column to track the highest quality of shot attempts. The last column totals the percentage of shot attempts that result in shots on net.
Zone Exit Stats
Forwards: 46.5 PE% is a good 5% below average for the forwards. The attempts were pretty well spread out, with Clowe once again leading the team (9 total attempts 4 with possession). There were only 43 zone exits for the forwards and most had between 3 – 5 attempts. A “blah” game. 4 turnovers certainly didn’t help.
Defensemen: 45.9 PE% for the defensemen as most of the turnovers and poor play seemed to occur more in the neutral and offensive zones (from a passing/zone exit standpoint). Only 2 turnovers were committed, but that belies a subpar defensive effort; when the Rangers entered the zone they either scored or accidentally put the puck out of the zone on their own several times. Gelinas actually led the blue line with a 57.1 PE%. Fayne was lowest as only 1 of his 4 attempts maintained possession.
Zone Exits Explained: Any attempt made by a player to advance the puck from their defensive zone. These actions fall into the below categories (as illustrated on the below chart).
P) Pass: When a player passes the puck out of the zone and it successfully finds a teammate.
(C) Carry: When a player skates with the puck out of the zone, maintaining possession.
Successful Zone Exits without Possession:
(FP) Failed Pass: When a player passes the puck out of the zone, but it fails to find its target.
(FC) Failed Carry: When a player skates with the puck out of the zone, but loses possession shortly thereafter.
(CH) Chip: When the player lifts the puck out of the zone or throws it off the boards and out.
(X) Other: Any action that results in a successful zone exit not already covered.
Unsuccessful Zone Exit:
(PT) Pass Turnover: When a player fails to clear the zone with a pass and it results in a turnover to the opposition.
(CT) Carry Turnover: When a player fails to skate out of the zone with the puck and loses possession.
(I) Icing: An attempt to clear results in icing the puck.
(T) Turnover: Any action that results in a turnover not already covered.
What reaction do you have to these stats? How do they compare with your viewing of the game?